Xi Transport : one system for all xi environments

Hi all
We have 4 Xi environments (DEV, TEST, PRE, PROD) in a single SLD. Each environment has it's own integration server.
We also have a third party system, but i's just a single system which has to be used by the 4 environments.
This is giving us problems when transporting the integration directory. It always complains that there is no corresponding business system in the TESTING group.
Originally the system was in the DEVELOPMENT group and assigned to the related integration server of development. No transports were defined.
We also tried,
group : (no group assigned)
related integration server : (none)
This resulted in the same error.
A workaround would be to export, assign system to TESTING environment, import and then restore the sytem back to DEVELOPMENT. However I was hoping for a more elegant solution, because this way requires a change in the SLD everytime you want to transport the integration directory.

Hi,
We faced a similar issue and this is how to resolved it,
Say you are moving the objects to the QA Integration Server.
Now, the Business Systems which are common across all environments, make the Related Integration Server as pointing to the QA Integration Server. Now, it will be allocated to the QA Transport Group.
Now transport and import and it will work fine!
The only thing that matters is that the Common Business Systems should point to the correct Integration Serrver ( Quality in our case! )
let me know if you didn't follow this,
Regards
Bhavesh

Similar Messages

  • Have iPad, iPod Touch and iPhone 4s. Can I use one charger for all

    I have and iPad, iPhone 4S and iPod 4. Can I use one charger for all 3 and if so, which one. TZ all

    You can use the iPad charger for all.

  • Generate one instance for all users in a Group

    Hi All,
    We have BO 3.1 with  FP 2.6.
    There is a report that needs to be schedule in such a way that it will generate only one instance for all the users belonging to u201CGlobalu201D community while for rest of the users wonu2019t see any instance of it. They will simply run the report on demand providing the prompt values.
    I am able to run the report for whole u201CGlobalu201D group (using u2018schedule foru2019) option but the problem is it creates as many instances as the number of users I have in this group. As users of this group have same data level access, so primarily theyu2019ll get same report output. That is why it is not desirable to run this report for all of them instead there should be a way it creates one instance after each schedule for the whole community.
    Please suggest.
    Thanks,
    Chandra

    Hi Chandra,
    I think there are still ways to use publications to achieve what you want.
    For instance, I created the below scenario:
    - Created 3 users (pub1, pub2, pub3) and put them in group (publication users)
    - I created a publication and specified the "publication users" group as the enterprise recipients
    - Set the destination to be Default & BusinessObjects Inbox.  Set the "Send As" option to Shortcut instead of copy.
    - Under Advanced, I set it to one db fetch for all recipients.
    - Scheduled this and it ran the report once, and created a shortcut to that object in each users inbox (user in the group specified)
    This meets most of your criteria.  The rest of it should be handled by security on the objects/folders.
    Another option may be Object Packages with the proper security setup.
    Thanks
    JB

  • What is the best practice for localization?One .rpt for all/each language?

    Hi All,
    I have a question :
    What is the best practice for localization?One .rpt for all language or one for each language? I
    Thanks for your response,
    jz

    Well, speaking of best practices, see the [Rules of Engagement|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/home/rulesofEngagement]
    Step 2 Asking Your Question; Provide Enough Information
    Next, make sure you search these forums before posting. Your question may just be already answered, thus giving you quicker resolution. For example, these threads come up just searching for "localization":
    Multiple language support
    Crystal Reports localization issue
    English resource files
    Next, (assuming you are working with CR 2008), see the developer help files:
    http://help.sap.com/businessobject/product_guides/boexir31/en/crsdk_net_dg_12_en.chm
    http://help.sap.com/businessobject/product_guides/boexir31/en/crsdk_net_apiRef_12_en.chm
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/boc/sdklibrary
    In the Crystal Reports 2008 .NET SDK developer Help file, search for "Localization".
    Ludek

  • What is the best practice for localization? One .rpt for all language

    Hi all,
    I have a question: what is the best practice for localization? One .rpt for all language or one .rpt for each language?
    Thanks for any response,
    Jz

    What would be best would depend on workflow.
    Sincerely,
    Ted Ueda

  • Where does one search for ALL the APPS that are available?

    Where does one search for All the apps that are available ?

    If you don't see any messages, not have anti-malware running or the Firewall on, try installing the Mac OS X 10.6.8 Update Combo
    It's ok to do this even though you are already running v10.6.8 (according to your profile).
    Restart your Mac after the combo in installed, try the App Store.
    Also... if you have an app called Little Snitch installed, that can prevent a connection to the App Store.

  • One Library for all users on the system - Sharing?

    Hello.
    I'm using iTunes 9.0.3 on OS X 10.6.2. On this system, there are TWO users, one for my wife, one for me. I'd like to "merge" the seperate iTunes libraries, so that there's only one shared library for all users.
    How could this be achieved?
    Searching the web, I found a writeup on [dougscripts.com by Paul Whitey|http://dougscripts.com/itunes/itinfo/sharedlib.php], which basically explains to move ~/Music/iTunes to /Users/Shared/iTunes and making sure that there's an alias in ~/Music pointing to /Users/Shared/iTunes. It also explains, that the ownership of the files & folders is to be changed so, that all users have read & write access. This then looks like this on my system:
    !http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/6223/fileinfowithbothusersha.png!
    -> http://yfrog.com/5yfileinfowithbothusershap
    It works good - both "alex" and "sandra" can work with these files (ie. move them, rename them, change ID3 tags).
    But see those:
    !http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/2183/fileinfowithonlyalexhav.png! !http://img686.imageshack.us/img686/7807/fileinfowithonlysandra4.png!
    --> http://yfrog.com/jufileinfowithonlyalexhavp & http://yfrog.com/j2fileinfowithonlysandra4p
    That's from files which sandra or alex have added later on. Only the one who added these files can modify them (which is of course correct, if you have a look at the file permissions).
    How would you go about having only ONE iTunes database on the system? Simply putting the iTunes Db on a shared folder doesn't work well, as can be seen above. Always having to fiddle around with the file permissions isn't exactly comfortable…
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks,
    Alex

    Hm. PowerTunes crashs, when I make it Share my library. I pasted the crash report at http://pbox.ca/13gwy
    Since I cannot know how/if would work (because of the crash…), please correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't it also just move the files to /Users/Shared and set permissions correctly? Wouldn't I need to keep on running PowerTunes from time to time, or is it "run once and forget" application (if it works)?

  • Changing Original System and Transport Target System for Objects

    Hi Gurus,
             I need to do mass transport of all the Infoobjects to newly defined system. Since these objects have different Original system. Its giving me error. Again, for other objects, Transport Target system is QAS, But we want to change it to NBW (A new system to which we want to send transport) . I am able to change package of Infoobjects. Is there mechanism to change Original System and Transport Target for System? Please let me know ASAP.
    Regards,
    Harpal
    Message was edited by:
            Harpalsinh Gohil

    If you simply edit your original post, it will go to the top of the list. There's no need to post duplicates.
    Subjects with a subject of "Urgent" will be filtered out by a lot of responders.
    Why not close this thread and bump the other one?
    Rob

  • Pls how do I maintain one account for all my windows?

    All I want is to manage one I'd for all eg iTunes,iPad store, etc

    eh?
    Do you mean just have one apple ID for everything? DO you already have one or do you have multiple ones?
    I'm afraid you need to be a bit more explicit with your question.

  • Only one signature for all mail accounts very limiting

    while the iphone is a very cool tool, i'm using the iphone for personal and work email,
    and i find it very limiting that there is only one signature possible for all mail accounts.
    standard, we all found out is written "written on my iphone" or something like that.
    i always thought it was very dorky when i read that from blueberry users last year, (as if i'm interested that someone reads and writes his work e-mails from a mobile)
    so, lets stop pretending it is cool to mail from the iphone, but just do it with all functionality it should have.
    like having multiple signatures for example with work signature when i'm working, and personal signatures when not
    meanwhile, can you (apple support) please help me loose less time when i want to erase my work signature every time i want to e-mail personally by adding functionality like "selecting bulk" and "cutting" (and then allowing to copy and paste while you're at it) to your sdk, Pronto please!
    thanks!
    anyone agrees? please follow up. maybe it helps speed up the improvement..

    Once you sync your mail accounts with iTunes the first time, you can turn that off in iTunes. You don't need to do that anymore, unless you make a change to the account. It only syncs the settings. You can reset the sync history after deleting the accounts from your phone and then do another sync. That should correct the problem. I'm not as familiar with Mac computers, but maybe someone with a Mac can help a little.
    Hope this answers your questions.

  • Using MVC - One model for each set of data, or one model for all?

    Hi there,
    I'm using MVC for my app, which pulls data from other sites, (news, blogs, video, twitter). Would I have a model for each set of data, or one for all that fires differint events depending on the data?
    Thanks in advance!

    Attached please find the screenshots and help me out. You can maximize to view em.
    Thanks,
    Attachments:
    Air water2000.vi ‏490 KB

  • Can we Open Period at one time for all entity

    Hi
    Environment: 11.5.10
    Is it possible to open period for all the legal entities at single click like R12.
    Any alternative?

    Quick way: Press Ctrl+N (Cmd-N mac) to open a new Bridge window. Open the second folder there.
    Not so quick way: Select menu File => New Window. Open the second folder there.
    If you MUST view all of the files in one window, all of your files MUST be in folders nested within the same parent folder. In that case:
    1) View the parent folder in bridge.
    2) Open the Filter palette.
    3) Click the microscopic button in the top left corner of the Filter palette, which looks like a folder with a "No" symbol on it. The tooltip label for that button is, "Click to view all items...".

  • Report header disappered for one user for all the reports

    Hello All,
    For one of my user the report header is disappered - for all reports he will execute.
    for all other users - they can see the header.
    How to solve this issue ?
    Thanks and Regards
    JJ

    it was related to SAP GUI - solution was to reinstall SAP GUI

  • One PR for all raw materials

    Hi,
    Is it possible that after MRP run we get only one Purchse requisition for all the raw materials.
    I will try to explain
    Suppose we have a finished product F1 and R1 , R2 and R3 are three raw materials required to produce F1.
    Now in a normal case when we take MRP run for F1 we get three PRs for R1, R2 and R3.
    But is it possible to get only one PR which will contain R1, R2 and R3 as line items (As we have in Purchase Orders) in it.
    Regards
    Abhi

    Abhi,
    At PR level it is not possible, but the workaround is that you can use the automatic PO using PR transaction (ME59N) to consolidate multiple PR into a single PO. There are certain prerequisites to be met for this,
    1. Vendor should be defined for Automatic PO, Materail Master Purchase view Auto PO to be activated.
    2. Inforecord for the material.
    3. Source list with fixed vendor and MRP relevant indicator needs to be maintained.
    with the above set of defination after MRP run Vendor gets assigned automatically to PR and you can use transaction "ME59N" to consolidate multiple PR's to a single PO.
    You can also run program "RM06BB30" to create PO's in background based on the selection critera given in the intial screen....
    I hope this would satisfy your need....Reward your points and close the thread,
    Regards,
    Prasobh

  • One Database for All Peoplesoft Applications

    Hi,
    Does anyone know whether its possible/recommended to use the same database for the different peoplesoft pillars. For example if there are the following apps being deployed:
    1. Campus
    2. Portal
    3. HCM/Payroll
    4. FSCM
    As I understand it each pillar has its own database - it is possible to share the same database for all pillars - resulting in just one database?
    Or is there a combination of pillars that could possibly be used to share the same database?
    Thanks

    Thanks Nicolas - I was looking at this from the point of view of Oracle E Business Suite which uses just the one database for the entire suite of applications. The question raised here was more from an administrative perspective i.e managing multiple databases - dedicating hardware for each install of the application, or using virtualization to isolate each application. Since I don't have a background in peoplesoft, the way you've explained it appears to at least help in understanding why this is not a good idea on the peoplesoft front - which is what I was looking for.

Maybe you are looking for