XMII version 12 and NW SPS compatibility

Hi.
I have been trying to find anything regarding xMII version 12 and compatibility with Netweaver SPS's. In the xMII installation guide it says SPS10 or later. Is this for real and can I upgrade Netweaver to the latest SPS ??
I have from Jeremy that I should use SPS10 to SPS14.
And finally, where to find the information, so I does not have to disturb all of you another time
PS. I have been via the PAM page, but it does not say anything. Installation guide (as I remember) says SPS10 or later.
BR
Poul.

Poul,
Per the installation guide:  http://service.sap.com/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01100035870000683969&_SCENARIO=01100035870000000202&_OBJECT=011000358700000202932007E
"SAP xMII 12.0 runs on the SAP NetWeaver Application Server (SAP NetWeaver AS)
component of SAP NetWeaver 7.0 (2004s) SPS 14 or higher."
A nice thing about the PAM ( https://service.sap.com/~form/handler?_APP=00200682500000002212&_EVENT=DISPLAY ) is that it has some convenient links for s/w download and the guides too.
Regards,
Jeremy

Similar Messages

  • I have a web site built by Yahoo Web Site Builder which does not have a Mac version, is there any compatability between Iweb and the old Yahoo program?

    I have a web site built by Yahoo Web Site Builder which does not have a Mac version, is there any compatability between Iweb and the old Yahoo program? If not how do I clear off the old site so as to re publish with Iweb.

    iWeb cannot import published files so you would need rebuild the site.
    Yahoo hosting is notoriously poor and their tech support is awful. I would suggest you look for new hosting and start afresh. Some pointers for choosing hosting...
    http://www.iwebformusicians.com/iWeb/Website-Hosting.html
    If you do choose to go this route, transfer your domain name registration away from Yahoo to your new host.

  • I just did edited a feature using Final Cut Pro Version 7 i want to upgrade to X will the clips i saved on version 7 still be compatibly and usable on X

    I just did edited a feature using Final Cut Pro Version 7 i want to upgrade to X will the clips i saved on version 7 still be compatibly and usable on X

    thanks I was afraid of upgrading to Pro X and having to redigitise all that footage again thx Tom

  • PAGES COMPATIBILITY PROBLEM BETWEEN THE 2009 IPAD VERSION AND 2008 MAC VERSION ON MY LAPTOP.  HOW DO WE FIX THIS?

    PAGES COMPATIBILITY PROBLEM BETWEEN THE 2009 IPAD VERSION AND 2008 MAC VERSION ON MY LAPTOP.  HOW DO WE FIX THIS?

    cherifrombartlett wrote:
    PAGES COMPATIBILITY PROBLEM BETWEEN THE 2009 IPAD VERSION
    What are you talking about? If I'm not not mistaken the iPad was released in April 2010 so there is no 2009 iPad version.
    Typing in all capital letters in a forum like this is considered to be rude and all capital letters indicate that you are shouting.

  • Firefox 3.6.6 is not working in Facebook games links. I've checked adobe version and updates, and disabled hang protection, also installed windows flashplayer 10 plugin content debugger.

    I am having trouble with firefox in facebook games links. Games do not load. Adobe flashplayer is the right version and is the latest for firefox. I have firefox 3.6.6. I have also installed windows flashplayer 10 plugin content debugger. I also changed the hangtime changing the sec to -1 from 45, previously. I have windows xp service pack 3 home edition. 2100 Mhz AMD processor, 512 MB memory, 2 GB virtual memory. adobe version is 10,0,42,34 I have adobe flashplayer 10 active x, adobe flashplayer 10 plugin, adobe reader 9.3, shockwave flash 10.1.53.64 with shockwave director 6.0.0.55 macromedia shockwave for director netscape plugin version 6.0, and shockwave director 11.0.3.470 adobe shockwave for director netscape plug-in, version 11.0. I have had problems with Adobe DLM version 1.6.2.63 as it is not compatable with firefox 3.6.6.
    == URL of affected sites ==
    http://

    Replying to my own question...
    Turns out that although libjavaplugin_oji.so is still shipped with Java, it's only there to support older browsers.
    With Firefox 3.6 and later, the link in plugins should instead point to jre/lib/i386/libnpjp2.so
    See:
    https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=542235

  • ILife 08 and iMovie 06 compatibility issues?

    Sorry if any of this has already been covered in other threads...
    Has anyone had a chance to thoroughly test the 6.04 version of iMovie (download version if you install iLife 08) and know what compatibility issues there are?
    I.E. How well does iPhoto 08 play with iMovie 06, or iMovie 06 with iDVD 08. Are the third party plugins problematic with v6.04?
    From what I saw at the Apple store, iPhoto08 and iDVD08 would be the only apps that I would really want since iMovie08 seems to be a step backwards and iWeb is still lacking in everything that I wanted improved. But I don't want to waste the money to discover all sorts of "gotchas" with trying to get iMovie06 to play nice with the rest of iLife08...
    Also, has anyone done an install excluding iMovie08 entirely? Do you still need to download 6.04 if installed this way? Are there any pitfalls?
    This is like Deja vu or something...When iLife06 first came out, I installed everything but iMovie and stuck with iMovie05 for a long time cause of all the bugs and how long it took to get the third party plugins working...

    Of all the things for people to moan about with iMovie '08, the real unfortunate thing is it's inability to import effects, etc. (essentially your completed movie) from iMovie HD. One could somewhat forgive Apple for this debacle, if only it played nice with iMovie HD. Then it could be everything it's supporters say it is, i.e. "a different app," "a simple app for simpletons in a hurry" (although I find it's lack of tools and compatibility issues more difficult to manage).
    ...and a lot of us feel like this is the thing we're going to be stuck with going forward.
    I keep thinking that something else is going to happen, because this can't be right. I think this diver/video engineer who came up with this concept is suffering from the bends.
    Apple doesn't need the money, (as in making us buy Final Cut Pro for decent video editing), trust me, so I don't understand why it would take the PR hit.
    iMovie '08 spoofs are already on YouTube, etc.
    Message was edited by: rmig68

  • Create a new user in xMII version 11.5

    I want to create a new user in xMII version 11.5 that has rights to view everything and create queries.  So far the user is part of the EVERYONE role and can view most of the items that the Admin can see.  My question what do I have to do in order to allow this user to create queries?  When I log in as this user and I click the query tab, it said that I do not have sufficient rights.

    I figured it was that simple.
    I haven't seen you on here in awhile.

  • Player 10.1 and Air using Compatibility Mode

    This is related to post at http://forums.adobe.com/message/2933137#2933137, but, thought I should start another since that one is marked answered.
    I'm having a similar issue with an Air app, but, I am using 4.1 SDK (and LCCS 10.1 swc), but still getting the same error regarding GroupSpecifier (pasted below).
    I have an Air app project and related web app project, which both use a library project (ARSystemLib in the trace below).  The library project is using 4.1 SDK, and has the Flex 3 compatibility mode turned on, along with 10.1.0 set as "use a specific version" under "Flash Player Options".  The Air project is also using 4.1 SDK and Flex 3 compatibility, along with the compiler option "-target-player=10.1.0".
    For the web app, I had to remove the "Use a specific version" of 10.1.0 for it to compile ( was getting many "Classes must not be nested", which seems to be a difficult issue to fix after much research on others getting this message).
    I'm okay with the web version not using 10.1 for p2p, but, critically need this for the Air version.  I'm hoping it's not the "Compatibility" mode setting, as reworking the app without is a huge undertaking.
    Thanks,
    David
    VerifyError: Error #1014: Class flash.net::GroupSpecifier could not be found.
    at com.adobe.rtc.session::ConnectSessionContainer()[/Users/arun/Work/aponnusa_theoden.corp.a dobe.com_1666/depot/branches/connect/1010/cocomoPlayer10.1/src/com/adobe/rtc/session/Conne ctSessionContainer.as:112]
    at com.ssc.compo

    Hi David,
    Apologies for the delayed response. I am guessing you will have to update the namespace in your <PROJECTNAME>-app.xml file under src of your project.
    Your name space should be 2.0 or greater.
    Its possible that your app has namespace like -
    <application xmlns="http://ns.adobe.com/air/application/1.5"> ,
    but it should be
    <application xmlns="http://ns.adobe.com/air/application/2.0">
    Also other options is to add -target-player=10.1.0 to your flex compiler options [additional compiler arguments]
    Thanks
    Arun

  • XMII version dependency

    Hi Gurus,
                       I have some confusion regarding xMII - SAP connectivity.
    If xMII is version dependent? e.g if xMII v12. can be accessible through a particular version of SAP(say 6.4).
    Do we need any special connectivity(connectors, BADI etc.) between xMII server and SAP or just installing the GUI for both will be enough?
    Thanks in Advance
    Message was edited by:
            Musarrat Husain

    I think the question should be more like - what version of SAP R/3 is accessible via xMII and not the other way round.
    In my personal experience I have connected xMII (ver 11.5) to SAP R/3 4.6 b/ 4.6c and more recently ECC 6.0.
    No special connectors are required as xMII uses JCO for connecting to R/3 systems and these classes are installed alongwith so many others when you install xMII, although from 12.0 there is JRA as well. Check up the xMII 12.0 help documentation for more information on that.
    Does this lessen your confusion to some extent?

  • DMM-DMS on 5.0 and 4310G DMP Compatibility

    I just bought 2 new 4310G DMP's and when they come up, they show as up for a short period of time and then show down.  I ensured that the passwords are the same on the DMP's and the DMM.  Is there an compatibility issue with the firmware, by chance?  I haven't been able to find anything, but that is my last guess.

    Hi there,
    Are you actually running 5.0 with a new DMP (which should ship with 5.4x) ?
    I have not tried this myself but the app releases match the corresponding DMP firmware versions and each update calls for updating the firmware on the endpoints.
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/video/digital_media_systems/5_x/5_4/dms/upgrade/guide/541upgrade.html
    Any information provided as a member of public community support forums is provided as-is and is not warrantied by Cisco or endorsed by TAC.

  • Jdeveloper version and ADF runtime on weblogic

    Hi
    I would need to understand the link between the jdeveloper version and the Weblogic version.
    Based on this article http://tompeez.wordpress.com/2011/09/14/jdeveloper-versions-vs-weblogic-server-versions/
    it sounds like the server version to use is directly linked to the version of ADF used for the development. It is true?
    Specially is it true that there is not backward compatibility. A new weblogic server would not support a application that would have been developed with a older version of jdeveloper?
    At the end I would like to get all my weblogic servers on the same version and as much possible on the newest version but if I need to rework the applications that were developed on a previous version of ADF , that can be really time consuming.
    I would need best practice ideas .
    When I have various projects oven a two -three years period how should we deal with keeping up with the new versions of weblogic and jdeveloper?
    An another question I have is regarding the ADF run time. What is so special about it comparing to a regular set of libraries?. Why can I not deploy it as part of my application? Or is it possible and it is a better path then?
    FInal point, I have a application that was developed with jdeveloper 11.1.1.0 and run on weblogic 10.3.0.0 . I would like to migrate to jdeveloper 11.1.1.4. I already converted the project with jdeveloper 11.1.1.4. What should I do next? What testing should I do to verfy the conversion worked? Should I update the weblogic server to 10.3.4 or can I go with a newer version like 10.3.5?
    Thanks

    Ok but then if you don't migrate and you are in a environment with also new development you are going to need many different servers no?
    One welogic server for jdevleoper 11.1.0.0
    One weblogic server for jdeveloper 11.1.2.0
    One weblogic server for jdeveloper 11.1.3.0
    One weblogic server for jdeveloper 11.1.4.0
    How often should you migrate then because if you don't update you could be very behind after a couple of years and may be the migration could be almost impossible at that point.
    We still have applications that where developed for oc4j 10 g and migration is almost rewrite at this point. (only after 3 years).
    At the end, you get servers dedicated to some applications instead of having a stack of multi purpose servers.
    Also let say you are starting with a project that is going to take two years, you start the developement with jdeveloper 11.1.5.0 and in two years it will jdeveloper 13.1.1.0. How do you manage this? You stay with 11.1.5.0?
    We noticed that getting support for 10 g is really difficult at this point. Many people don't know anymore about 10 g and you don't get bug fix. If you don't get bug fix, how can you survive with your old version?
    I know that ADF is not only about the face part, I 've been using the business services too but under ADF it is J2EE and then why ADF does not come as a set of libraries that you can link to in your J2EE project instead of becoming a server centric runtime?
    People went to J2EE to get plateform independent, with ADF you are becoming server dependant. ADF is supposed to do better than .net but if you look at .net the IDE actually support old and new frameworks. If you get to develop on a older framework you can still use the new IDE. Also you can install several versions of the framework on the same server with .net.
    From what I can read ADF is not even supported on JBOSS anymore so give me argument to choose ADF as a enterprise solution? Is it really the future?

  • Final Cut Pro 4.5 and Quicktime 7 compatibility issues. Error 39!

    I see some people saying Quicktime 7 is not compatible with Final Cut 4.5 and some saying it is.
    I upgraded to 10.3.9 and then Quicktime 7 and I started getting error 39 at this one spot in my timeline and then crashing if I tried to play just a few seconds ahead of that spot. I tried trashing the prefs but that didn't do any good. The individual files play fine outside the timeline so it isn't corrupt media. I tried rerendering the effects that are at that point but that didn't help. I tried copying the entire timeline to a new sequence and that didn't help.
    The strange thing was that when I took the part of the movie that was having trouble and deleted it from the timeline it still got error 39 when just playing over the empty timeline where the media used to be! This led me to realize that the problem lay in some Quicktime audio effects I had about a second in front ot the error 39 spot. I took off the effects from that audio but it didn't help. Then I deleted that audio from the timeline and just pasted it back in from the original clip and then it finally got to working.
    Now I know nothing about the software, but I thought there might be some connection between the fact that I had effects that FCP labels as "quicktime effects" on there from my days in Quicktime 6.5, then upgraded to Q7, and perhaps those old effects don't work in Q7? I don't know.
    So, my immediate problem is solved but I thought this experience may be of use to someone else. And perhaps some compatibility issues can be brought to light.

    I would assume the Software Update program has sufficient logic within it to detect that my friend is running Final Cut Pro 4.0 and it would therefore be disastrous to install QuickTime 7.3, thus removing QuickTime 7.3 from her list of suggested updates. Would someone at Apple please fix this?
    Sorry, but Quicktime is a component for SO MANY things, not just FCP. Sorry, but the OS doesn't detect that older versions of software are on there and won't be compatible...this is where you need to have a little knowledge. And sorry, but you need to have a little knowledge. If things are working, DO NOT UPGRADE unless it has been tested and cleared. In the case of FCP 4...it has not.
    Rule of thumb...if you use older software, you have to stick to older versions of the OS and components that that software relies on.
    How many things were broken with Vista? So many that the HUGE community let out a cry and now XP is available again configured on machines or as a stand alone buy. And no, Vista didn't warn that certain applications wouldn't work either.
    You gotta research and find out. This place here...this forum...is a FANTASTIC place to find stuff like this out.
    BTW...Apple doesn't read these forums, only us users. Gotta submit feedback here:
    http://www.apple.com/feedback/finalcutpro.html
    Shane

  • Which version of Coherence is compatable with Weblogic Server 10.0 MP2

    Want to know :
    Which version of Coherence is compatable with Weblogic 10 MP2.
    Is it that Coherence is supported only on WebLogic Server 10.3 and above?

    Hi Anup,
    Maybe you should be a bit more specific about what you want to do. Coherence is just Java and has been supported WebLogic for years in the same way most other third-party Java libraries and APIs are. I first started using Coherence about four or five years ago with WebLogic 8.
    JK

  • Hi. I am working on a Mac OSX 10.10.2 Yosemite. I'm working remotely with a woman who is using indesign CS8.2 I'm still on CS6.8 and can't open her files. I would like to upgrade to the latest version and I'd also like to know why these upgrades are not a

    Hi. I am working on a Mac OSX 10.10.2 Yosemite. I'm working remotely with a woman who is using indesign CS8.2 I'm still on CS6.8 and can't open her files. I would like to upgrade to the latest version and I'd also like to know why these upgrades are not automatic as i pay a monthly subscription to the cloud. Thanks.

    A Cloud subscription SHOULD always show you the most recent updates, so you may then choose to do the install
    CC desktop lists applications as "Up to Date" when they are not
    -http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/kb/aam-lists-removed-apps-date.html
    -and added step https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1529654
    Yosemite sometimes has problems, often related to "default" permissions needing to be changed
    -one person's solution https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1689788
    -and a Java update https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1507936
    -update breaks things https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1772260
    -http://blogs.adobe.com/creativecloud/creative-cloud-and-yosemite/
    -https://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/mac-os-yosemite-compatability.html

  • When will Windows 7 and IE 8 compatability roll out?

    If you look at this thread 'Xcelsius 2008 Fix Pack 3.1 (FP3.1) is now available'  there is a "upcoming major Xcelsius release" mentioned but no dates or timelines.  When is this going to happen and will Windows 7 compatability be part of that release?  I have customers right now that want to know, if they integrate some Xelcius dashboards into our web application, will this work in Windows 7 and IE 8.
    I also noticed the expiration notice on 2008 Engage Server going away.  I have Xcelsius 2008 Engage (not the server version).  What is the estimated life cycle on it in light of the Server version going away next year.
    P.S. I am aware of the XP compatability mode in Windows 7 but I have a hard time believing SAP would consider that a permanent solution.

    Hi Matt,
         I understand you can't give any detailed timelines yet, as I can only assume you guys are still early in the development cycle for some of the fixes and updates required for Windows 7 and IE 8 compatibility.  My problem is I have customers that want a reporting solution integrated into the web application my company provides as a product.  We want to sell them on the idea of buying Xcelsius licenses and developing their own metrics reports that would seamlessly integrate with our application and we provide an API for them to do that right now.  It becomes a pretty tough sell when they ask about Windows 7 and IE 8 compatibility and I can't really tell them anything definitive other then  "I think SAP is working on that?".  Its not like were talking about an obscure OS and browser, this is Microsoft after all and its my understanding they have a bit of a following    .  I would, at the very least, like to be able to confidently tell my customers that SAP is commited to making sure Xcelsius 2008 Engage (or what ever the next version name is ) will be fully compatible with Windows 7 and IE 8 and that the long term plan is the end of this year? middle of next year? some other non-ridiculous time frame so I can assure them its not a waste of time waiting for this product to be updated?
         You mentioned any SWF files we create (at least it was implied) should run as long as Flash Player 9 or later is installed? Is that truly the case? The reason I ask is the Adobe web site says the Flash Player 10 is compatible with both Windows 7 and IE8.  Is the only issue driving this compatability problem the version of the Flash Player installed, or are there still some pieces of Xcelsius that need to be rewritten to accomodate Windows 7 and IE8 regardless of what version of Flash Player is resident?  Bottom line is what can I tell my customers to reassure them this is the correct path forward for their reporting needs?
    Thanks,
    Matt
    Edited by: mathiasX on May 5, 2010 1:29 AM

Maybe you are looking for