XP 64bit version detection not working

None of the FAQs, tech notes or documentation explains how I can get the XP64 version of the iTunes installer - they only explain that I need it.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1426?viewlocale=en_US
This article implies that the itunes download page automatically serves the appropriate version based on your OS. It doesn't. I have tried it in IE7, Safari and Firefox 3. I have no other browsers. I am always served the 32bit version. It states in several places across the site that the 64bit version is called "iTunes864Setup.exe", but that isn't the version i'm given.
Can someone please give me a direct link to that exact file, as it seems quite clear that Apple are unwilling to do so themselves.

You need to download the Windows Vista 64-bit version of the installer and then click here for information.
(35474)

Similar Messages

TS2776 I can"t syn my ipod nano as I had a new version of itunes installed as my old version was not working at all. The message I get is that it can't sync as my old music library is not on the new version of itunes but I still have it on my ipod.

I can't sync my ipod nano with the new version of itunes that I downloaded as the old version was not working. The response I get is that" it can't sync due to my old music library which I still have on my ipod, can someone help with this, Thanks Peter

See Recover your iTunes library from your iPod or iOS device.
tt2

Debug version works well, but release version does not work with simulator

Hi,
I use iOS 7.0.3 and Xcode 5.0.2.
I developped one application and I tested with simulator-ipad retina. The debug version works well and release version did not work at all.
The basic configuraton is like this:
cocos2d: cocos2d-iphone v2.1
cocos2d: compiled with Profiling Support: NO
cocos2d: OS version: 7.0.3 (0x07000300)
cocos2d: GL_VENDOR: Apple Computer, Inc.
cocos2d: GL_RENDERER: Apple Software Renderer
cocos2d: GL_VERSION: OpenGL ES 2.0 APPLE-9.2.1
cocos2d: GL_MAX_TEXTURE_SIZE: 4096
cocos2d: GL_MAX_TEXTURE_UNITS: 8
cocos2d: GL_MAX_SAMPLES: 4
cocos2d: GL supports PVRTC: YES
cocos2d: GL supports BGRA8888 textures: YES
cocos2d: GL supports NPOT textures: YES
cocos2d: GL supports discard_framebuffer: YES
cocos2d: GL supports shareable VAO: NO
What is the reason and how to fix it?

Well, yes...you need to upgrade to OS X Server 4.0 ($19.99)...I already did it also!

I have a trial version of Photoshop and Lightroom installed with a view of taking out a subscription. Some of the features in this trial version do not work is this just because it is a trial version.

I have a trial version of Photoshop and Lightroom installed with a view of taking out a subscription. Some of the features in this trial version do not work is this just because it is a trial version.

BOILERPLATE TEXT:
Note that this is boilerplate text.
If you give complete and detailed information about your setup and the issue at hand,
such as your platform (Mac or Win),
exact versions of your OS, of Photoshop (not just "CS6", but something like CS6v.13.0.6) and of Bridge,
your settings in Photoshop > Preference > Performance
the type of file you were working on,
machine specs, such as total installed RAM, scratch file HDs, total available HD space, video card specs, including total VRAM installed,
what troubleshooting steps you have taken so far,
what error message(s) you receive,
if having issues opening raw files also the exact camera make and model that generated them,
if you're having printing issues, indicate the exact make and model of your printer, paper size, image dimensions in pixels (so many pixels wide by so many pixels high). if going through a RIP, specify that too.
etc.,
someone may be able to help you (not necessarily this poster).
a screen shot of your settings or of the image could be very helpful too.
Please read this FAQ for advice on how to ask your questions correctly for quicker and better answers:
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/419981?tstart=0
Thanks!

Slow-link detection not working.

Slow-link detection not working.
In our branch office in Ethiopia we are experiencing some issues with the access to mappings. Our main office is located in the Netherlands. The Offices are connected with a VPN site2site solution.
We map a home folder to H:\ (which is working).
We map a Document share to L:\ (which is not working).
We map a Programs share to X:\ (which is not working).
All shares are DFS namespace.
We have set the according GPO which results in the following reg keys:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\NetCache\SlowLinkParams]
"\\\\DOMAIN.XXX.NL\\dfsdata"="Latency=32000"
"\\\\DOMAIN.XXX.NL\\dfsdata\\Home1"="Latency=360"
"\\\\DOMAIN.XXX.NL\\dfsdata\\Home2"="Latency=360"
"\\\\DOMAIN.XXX.NL\\dfsdata\\ConcernData"="Latency=360"
"\\\\DOMAIN.XXX.NL\\dfsdata\\Programs"="Latency=360"
The detection says in the eventvwr (OfflineFiles) says:
Path \\ DOMAIN.XXX.NL \dfsdata\home1 transitioned to slow link with latency = 106 and bandwidth = 270472
So the Homedrive is working.
But when I try to access the DFS root I get:
Windows cannot access "\\DOMAIN.XXX.NL\dfsdata
You do not have permission to access....."
And yes, the user has permission.
So the L-drive and X-drive are not accessible.
How come?

Hi,
>>Slow-link detection not working.
Did we check group policy result to see if the policy setting was applied successfully? We can run command gpresult/v or gpresult/z to collect group policy result.
Besides, instead of just focusing on slow link, this issue may be related to DFS namespace.
Regarding this point, the following blog can be referred to for more information.
Using DFS Namespaces and Offline Files
http://blogs.technet.com/b/filecab/archive/2006/01/19/using-dfs-namespaces-and-offline-files.aspx
Regarding how to troubleshoot DFS namespace problem, the following article and blog can be referred to for more information.
How to troubleshoot Distributed File System Namespace access failures in Windows
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/975440/en-us
TechNet Subscriber Support
If you are TechNet Subscription user and have any feedback on our support quality, please send your feedback here.
Best regards,
Frank Shen

Firefox ESR 10.0.12 disables flash plugin - updates to the last version do not work?

Suddenly - without any actions by me - FF ESR 10.0.12 refuses to accept Adobe Flash? (System Win 7 64 Ultimate)
It started with a very annoying bar, which cost me 2 hours to deactivate, which told me to update an very old and unused Adobe Reader plugin. Then it insisted, that the Foxit PDF reader plugin was not up to date. Since I do not use it, I deactivated it too. Since I seldom use Flash, I just found out today, that youtube does not work anymore - FF insists, that my flash plugin is too old and it deactivated it.
This has cost me hours up to now and it is _exactly_ the reason why I use the ESR channel.
What I did:
Deinstalled Adobe Flash completely (using Windows). Used the normal Firefox update, which it recommends (your flash player was deactivated, please install...). No success, it simply goes into a loop, always telling me my flash player is too old.
I also installed it directly from Adobe (the Firefox version!!), in all cases it reports version 11.5.502.104. The last version from Adobe - but it seems to be too old???
I am spitting angry now - this kind of trouble is the reason I only use ESR versions from Mozilla. I do not want your chaos troupe to play around with _my_ installation. But obviously you found ways to do so.
If this is not solved (and no, I will _not_ reinstall Firefox, I will _not_ delete my profile) in a few days, Firefox is dead for me. I am already looking to Chrome and Opera. Many friends have these browsers - I am a bit conservative, and I want my browser stable and the look an feel should be stable also. I do _not_ want a new version every two weeks, which every time costs my effort and time to configure it how I want it.
The question here is: How did you manage to disable the last version of Flash, and why? Why must I now register here and invest valuable time to get my browser to work again?? If I had done something, installed or removed something, ok. But I did not. (And yes, up to now I did update Flash and other plugins, when I was prompted to do so)
Clearly _your_ management does _not_ work: If I use the solutions which FF itself recommends, it sends me in an endless loop: Install newest Flash, sorry, Flash is outdated, install newest Flash...
Is this the 'new security'? Bah. If you did this for the 'normal user' (which you obviously do not respect anymore), you failed. And you failed completely for me: If software insists to do things 'automatically', it should at least do them reliably, _or_ it should ask. But working in the background, changing important things, reporting nothing, and then failing is exactly the reason why I disable all 'automatic' activities and want to be _asked_ before some idiotic piece of c.... deconfigures itself - and stops working...
Hints to the Troubleshooting Info below:
At this time Flash player is installed, shows in the systems software list as 'Adobe Flash Player 11 Plugin', Version 11.5.502.146. The rest are my normal plugins. Serveral changes to about:config were done by me in an effort to make FF usable again, without nagging 'info' bars...

Additional information - according to the wiki you pointed me to, it was correct to uninstall flash using Windows control panel. I am very sure that I already had the latest version installed from the beginning, because Flash player pointed me to an update on Windows start (as usual) several days ago.
The error clearly lies with FF, since despite an up to date Flash player it decided it wants it new - something to do with the blacklist? How can it tell, that its outdated, if it does not find it and not show it in the list of plugins?
There is something fishy here...

Adobe photoshop elements 13 trial version will not work on windows XP. Does this mean that if I purchase the full version, this also will not work on XP?

I have Photoshop Elements 12 and want to try version 13 before I buy. However, when I tried to download the trial version of Adobe Photoshop Elements 13, I was informed that it isa not available on Windows XP. Does this mean that if I buy the full version, it will not work on Windows XP?

Yes, if the system requirements do not include XP then an XP machine will not be able to use it.
System Requirements
Windows
1.6GHz or faster processor with SSE2 support
Microsoft Windows 7 or Windows 8 (32-bit versions will be installed on 32-bit systems; 64-bit versions will be installed on 64-bit systems)
2GB of RAM
5GB of available hard-disk space
(additional free space required during installation)
1024x768 display resolution (at 100% scale factor)
Microsoft DirectX 9 or 10 compatible display driver
DVD-ROM drive (for installation from DVD)
QuickTime 7 software
Internet connection required for product activation and content download*

Acrobat Pro version 6 not working in vista ( Windows 7 ) ?

What is the problem with adobe Acrobat pro version 6 and vista (windows 7)?.....really annoying having to upgrade later version costing hundreds of pounds

I am not sure if VISTA has the same problem as Win7 or not. For Win7, the AcroTray application that is used for PDF creation (both when printing to the Adobe PDF printer and with PDF Maker in AA6) will likely not work correctly. This may also be the case with VISTA. To get around this problem you have to print-to-file (you can change the PDF Port to FILE in the printer properties). After the file is create, you can open it in Distiller to complete the PDF creation. It may be possible to create watched folders to automate this process, but is not as ideal. In any case, you will likely have to use a work around. Also, update your AA6 (currently at 6.0.6). I have been able to do this with AA5 on Win7 as a test and it did indeed work. There may still be other issues for AA5 on Win7, but that was the major one.
All of these changes came from the rewrite that Adobe had to do to be compatible with the new OSs, not a trivial task. Do you want to blame Adobe or MS or both? Take your pick, but the end result is that it is time to upgrade. Unfortunately, AA6 can not be upgraded to AAX. You have to buy AAX at full cost at this point. To get the upgrade you would have to have at least AA7.

Java 8u31 (last version) is not working Yosemite

I have installed java normally 8u31. But, On browsers google and safari, it is not working. I see blank page. However, when I check it on terminal, given
java version "1.8.0_31"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_31-b13)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.31-b07, mixed mode)
Java content is also enabled on system prefences security tab
after a while time verify page shows
Thank you for solution

Hi,
Check whether environment variable JAVA_HOME present or not ?
If no, then set the variable with value as path of java home directory.
Thanks
Anil

My adobe flashplayer latest version will not work since firefox 7.0 update

I know there is a problem with this because I have already seen it many times on the internet. Not happy that I can no longer watch any videos since the update. I have downloaded the latest version of adobe. I can see the"flash player" under my control panel but it is not listed in my plugins under the tools/add-ons.
I also followed the procedure shown on mozilla support to download the add on manager but it did not work either. It does also state on the mozilla website that they are quite aware that this has caused a problem for many. When is this going to be corrected?
So, I finally went back to Firefox version 3.6 just so I could still see my videos.

Hello, first update Firefox to v17.0.1 (or in the next days v18) please.
Are your drivers and DirectX up to date (very important) ?
Do you have tried to disable Flash Player Protected Mode (since v11.3) ? (that could explain why it is working with Flash Player v11.2)
Do you have tried to disable Hardware Acceleration (Flash Player or/and Firefox) ?
Do you have tried to disable all other extensions and plugins in Firefox ?
Do you have tried to use the Firefox safe mode ?
Do you have tried to disable your antivirus / firewall programm ?

Photoshop elements trial version plugin not working with lightroom

Hello,
I just downloaded adobe photoshop element trial version.
The plug-in is not working with my already installed Lightroom.
Any idea what I need to do?
Thanks!

I can't edit in Elements either. May be trial version of Elements can not be linked to Lightroom. Any thoughts?

Trial version does not work properly

I downloaded the Encore DVD 2.0 trialversion and I have the impression that it is not fully functional i.e.
- very few menus in the library, compared to what appears from the Help
directory
- the frame by frame buttons on the monitor do not work
- the button routing cannot be changed, whatever I tried
- specifying a new name in Disc > Properties has no effect: the player
window still shows: Unknown DVD
Since I already spent much time searching for functions that apparently are missing, could anyone please let me know what I am doing wrong or which functions are disabled in the trial version?
Many thanks,
Jolt Oostra

Jolt.
To make a disc show up with the correct name in Media Player, the title would need to be registered with www.windowsmedia.com
It's the same reason a home cooed CD will show up as "Unknown CD" until it gets registered with the Freedb database.
Activation.
You cannot activate the trial version - this times out after 30 days, and you will need to uninstall it & then re-install the full version - as you cannot enter a serial number to a trial copy.
Functionality is identical, but there is a much larger library with the full version.
Chapter Points.
These can only be placed on GOP headers, or approximately every 0.4 or 0.5 seconds. However, if using an AVI file, Chapter points can be placed anywhere at all as long as you leave a gap of 0.5 seconds minimum between points. When it gets transcoded to MPEG-2, the transcoder will create GOP headers at each chapter point. As such, an AVI will allow greater accuracy in placement.
Hope this helps

I upgraded Safari in my Mac (10.6.8 Leopard) but the new version does not work with my system so that I now have not a working browser. How can I solve the problem and/or install back my previous Safari version?

I have upgraded Safari in my Mac, but the new Safari does not work with my system. So I find myself without any working browser. How can I solve this problem and/or install my previous Safari version?

Reinstall Safari 5.1.10 for OS X 10.6.8: http://support.apple.com/kb/dl1569. Might do the trick.
But, frankly, I don't think that simply reinstalling the old Safari will work because of all the peripheral, under the hood changes that happen when you upgrade from one version of Safari to another. Reinstalling 5.1.10 may be insufficient to turn back the clock. (This is the moment where a Time Machine or another form of full backup would save your bacon.)
While you're getting a copy of Safari 5.1.10, get a copy of Firefox (https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/desktop/), too, so that you have an alternate browser to use as you're sorting matters.

I upgraded to lion but versions is not working

I have upgraded, and wanted to try versions but it is not working. I have made multiple changes since the lion upgrade. I got Iwork not in the mac app store because I had it before. Does that mean anything? And there is no software update. Thanks

First, do a favor and check your version of Pages from the Pages menu. If it is 4.1, that's the latest one and a different course of action/troubleshooting needs to take place to find out why Versions doesn't appear to be working.
If it's less than 4.1, we should continue investigating why you cannot update to that version.
Also, please verify that you installed iWork from the retail DVD, because if you purchased from the Mac App Store, you would have to use that to update iWork applications.
(Launch Mac App Store, check the Purchases tab on the top.)
As far as which Applications folder iWork should be located in, it should be in the one that appears when, from Finder, you choose "Applications" from the "Go" menu.
That is the only way to verify that your applications are in the correct Applications folder. (Note: clicking "Applications" on the left-hand side bar of Finder does not verify their proper location.)
So.. if you have done both of those verification steps and you still do not see Pages on version 4.1, then you would probably want to reinstall iWork.
To remove iWork completely, you need to remove it from your Applications folder, of course... and also remove:
/Macintosh HD / Library / Application Support / iWork.
Both of those folders must be removed for a reinstall to be successful.

New version will not work with yahoo tool bar. How can I fix this problem ?

I downloaded the new version of Firefox and it will not work with my yahoo toolbar anymore.It worked fine until I updated to the new version. I have went back to the old version 16.0 and now it keeps saying my version is out of date. How can I fix this problem and get the new version to work with my yahoo tool bar?

For starters make sure you have the latest Yahoo toolbar.
http://help.yahoo.com/kb/index?page=content&y=PROD_TOOL&locale=en_CA&id=SLN5044&impressions=false

XP 64bit version detection not working

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for