Xpath - Conditional receiver

Hi
While selecting the receiver in receiver determination i am getting the below message.
Message interface does not exist in any software components installed on this business system" it says that schema is not correct?
becuase of this in my Xpath i m not able to see the whole structure.
Am I missing somthing?
chirag

It is just a warning that says your software component is not installed on source business system in SLD. And that is why source structure is not displayed in condition editor.
You can manually write the XPath,  like /p1:MT_Src/Node1 and it should work

Similar Messages

  • ** XPath condition not work well in Receiver Determination.

    Hi,
    My scenario is having 3 receivers. I have 'Student' is the data type. I use the same data type for Source & Target Message Types. Requirement is I have to send
    1) only records which are having SCOURSE = 'BE' to receiver 1
    2) only records which are having SCOURSE = 'MCA' to receiver 2
    3) only records which are having SCOURSE = 'MBA' to receiver 3
    My Input.xml file contains the following records.
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <ns0:THIRD_MT_OB xmlns:ns0="http://ganesh_third">
       <STUDENT_INFO>
          <ST_ID>10020</ST_ID>
          <SNAME>Raja</SNAME>
          <SCOURSE>BE</SCOURSE>
          <SFEES>3000</SFEES>
          <SMARKS>1200</SMARKS>
       </STUDENT_INFO>
       <STUDENT_INFO>
          <ST_ID>10021</ST_ID>
          <SNAME>Ram</SNAME>
          <SCOURSE>MCA</SCOURSE>
          <SFEES>3000</SFEES>
          <SMARKS>1200</SMARKS>
       </STUDENT_INFO>
       <STUDENT_INFO>
          <ST_ID>10022</ST_ID>
          <SNAME>Ram</SNAME>
          <SCOURSE>MBA</SCOURSE>
          <SFEES>3000</SFEES>
          <SMARKS>1200</SMARKS>
       </STUDENT_INFO>
    </ns0:THIRD_MT_OB>
    I set the Xpath condition in the Receiver Determination Step and add the 3 receivers for against the conditions.
    Our problem is, If we send the single record in the input file, the corresponding receiver is selected correctly and we get the output file for that receiver. But, if we send the all combination of records (MCA,BE,MBA) 3 receivers are selected and the 3 output files we get. But, the three files are having the all records (MCA,BE,MBA). Instead, we want the first file should only have MCA record,  the 2nd file should only have BE record and finally the 3rd file should only have MBA record. That means each receiver should receive only one record for the above input.
    Friends, I though it will work for the 'XPath Expression' against receivers in the Receiver Determination Step. But, it didn't work. (Records are not split up)
    How do achieve this, friends?
    Could you kindly help me to solve this problem.
    Kind Regards,
    Jeg P.

    If you are trying to split you input msg and send it  to 3 different receivers using conditional receiver determination then it will not work. Once a condition is meet in the receiver determination then the entire msg is forwarded to the corresponding receiver, that is why when you have a single row in your input file which results in a single msg in XI the conditional receiver works. Now when you have multiple rows in your input file still only one msg is being created in XI for all the rows currently so all the conditions are being meet and the msg is forwarded to all the receivers.
    If you are using FCC in the sender side then use the "recordset per msg" parameter to consider each row of your input file as a separate msg in XI and the rest will automatically fall in place.
    Cheer's

  • Conditions using xpath in Receiver determination

    How to write conditions using xpath in receiver determaination. Please provide few examples.
    Regards,
    Suresh.

    hi
    Defining Conditions
    You also have the option of specifying the conditions to be applied when forwarding a message to the receiver(s) in a receiver determination.
    Generally, a condition relates to the contents of a message; if a specified condition is fulfilled for a particular payload element (the corresponding element has a certain value, for example), then the message is forwarded to the specified receiver(s).
    &#9679;     If you want to specify a new condition for forwarding the message to a receiver, in the table in the Display/Edit Receiver Determination editor in the Configured Receivers frame, choose Insert New Condition () and call the condition editor by using the input help ().
    &#9679;     If you want to specify a new condition for forwarding the message to multiple receivers, in the table in the Display/Edit Receiver Determination editor in the Configured Receivers frame, choose Insert Line After Selection ( ) and call the condition editor  by using the input help (). 
    In the condition editor, you can select an element from the message payload and specify a value with which the value of this element is to be compared at runtime.
    check the link below
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/67/49767669963545a071a190b77a9a23/content.htm
    note:reward points if solution found helpfull.....
    regards
    chandrakanth.k

  • IDoc to IDoc - conditional receiver determination issue

    Hello All,
    We are using XI 3.0 and this is my scenario:
    Sender: IDOC from SAP system
    Receivers: There are 2 receivers (one SAP and one non sap system).
    I want conditional receiver determination based on the idoc field RCVPRN.
    Integration Repository: I imported standard SAP IDOC FIDCC2 into IR and it is in "urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages" namespace of my SWCV. I am not creating data types, message types or message interfaces as I want to use the IDOC type directly as the interface name in Integration directory.
    Integration directory: When I am creating receiver determination, I am getting a warning 'Message interface does not exist in any software components installed on this business system'. When I got to condition editor and want to choose the idoc field RCVPRN using XPATH, it is not showing the idoc structure.
    In SLD, the correct product is installed on my sender ABAP technical system, and correct SWCV (into which i imported the IDOC) is installed on my business system. I refreshed cache and cleared SLD cache in ID. Still i get the same warning 'Message interface does not exist in any software components installed on this business system'.
    How can i solve this issue? Any help is highly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Chandra

    Hi Chandra,
    Can you check whether you have assigned or linked the SWCV with the Business system in SLD.
    Just go to SLD and open the SWCV and check if it is linked with the BS od the sender system.
    Since the sender is ABAP, you must have created the TS and BS using rz70, then see that that the SWCV is attached to the BS correctly. Under TS add the Product and then the corresponding SWCV.
    Also check one thing: are u selecting the correct Communication component, under which the Interface is present.
    Lastly if these doesnot work: In Integration Directory, Go to Environment-> Clear SLD Data Cache. Then try once again.
    Cheers,
    Souvik
    Edited by: Souvik Chatterjee on May 16, 2011 3:39 PM

  • Condition receiver determination: Condition Editor

    Hi,
    I have to ruote the message to multiple receivers based on source filed value. 
    1) If FIELD-A = 1 or 2 or 3, we have to send it to RECEIVER-1
    root/FIELD-A = 1 or root/FIELD-A = 2 or root/FIELD-A = 3 = RECEIVER-1
    2) If FILED-A # 1 or 2 or 3 (anything other than 1,2 and 3), we have to send it to RECEIVER-2
    3) No matter what the FIELD-A value (1,2,3,4, anything), we have to send it to RECEIVER-3
    I have configured it in condition receiver determination:
    Conditions 1 and 3 are workign fine, but how do I make condition-2 work?
    I have tried to give root/FIELD-A # 1 or root/FIELD-A # 2 or root/FIELD-A # 3 = RECEIVER-2, It didn't work, even if the value is 2, message is being send to RECEIVER-2.
    How define 2nd condition in condition editor?
    Thanks in advance,
    Riya Patil

    Hi Riya,
    Please give following condition and check.
    (/BOL[(Revision != '1'and Revision != '2' and Revision != '3')]) EX
    Also if you are not able to see Message type in XPATH, please check if that software component is present in corresponding technical system of source busniess system in SLD.
    Once you see messagetype in XPATH, just select corresponding Revision Field in XPATH Editor and give above condition. Operator should be exists.
    Let me know if you face any issue.
    -Gouri

  • Reg:Xpath in receiver determination

    Hello,
    My message strcture looks like below.
    Record
    Level1
    item
    field1
    Level2
    item
    field2
    Level3
    item
    field3
    There can be multiple items for each level.
    Here goes my condition.
    I have to send the message to the receiver system "A" only when filed2 value is same across all items under level2 i.e. if there are three items under level2, then field2 should have the same value  across the items.
    Can you please let me know how do we impliment this in the reciver determination step using xpath?
    Regards,
    Rahul

    Rahul,
    Your scenario can be achieved using Enhanced Receiver Determination. Using Xpath in Receiver Determination might become complex for your condition.
    Refer below links for Enhanced Receiver Determination.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/a5f2066340332de10000000a11466f/frameset.htm
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/3343
    Regards,
    Geetha

  • Use of range in case of XPATH for receiver determination.

    Hi Experts,
    I need to achieve the following using standard receiver determination.
    The material number in the source message structure has to lie within a perticular range and that should decide the receiver of the message.
    For example:
    MT_SRC
    |---- Ele1
    |----
    MaterialNo.
    If MaterialNo is between 100000100 and 100001000 then it should be sent to BS_TGT1 else it should be sent to BS_TGT2.
    Is it possible to achieve this using the standard conditional receiver determination using XPATH and if yes, how exactly?
    Regards,
    Amol

    Hi Amol,
    I think its possible. Never tried though for a range.
    Go through this link and check out what is described under the section "Notes Regarding the Use of XPath Expressions"
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/a513f2632c332ce10000000a11466f/frameset.htm
    I am not sure whether it will work for two conditions though, i.e. for a range( Greater than 100000100, less than 100001000).
    Just try and let us know.
    Regards,
    Sanjeev.

  • Conditional Receiver Determination Through Integration Scenario

    Hi
    My question is "Is  it possible to generate conditional receiver detrmination through integration scenario?"
    If yes then how?
    Thanks and Regards
    Sami

    Hi Biplab,
    Yes , there is lots of modification in PI 7.1. and we start using it, you will come to know. In this TechEd at banglore , i did hands on the Mapping and it was really good experience, When i started configuring ID, i came to know some powerful ways, and yes i am really looking forward to working on it. Actually, as you know when we configure everything in ID, it becomes complicated, that is rectified thr and also some additional features. Pretty faster than PI 7 we using. also configuration in some extend is automated, we doen't need to bother to configure some of the steps :).
    Also you must know that, it added a concept of ESR for IB. Just have a look on some of the PPT for PI 7.1 and you feel it :).
    Aashish

  • Xpath condition in interface determination

    Hi all,
    I have a scenario where i have two Interface mappings between same source and target. I need to define a condition based on if a field exists, then first one should be executed and if the field doesn't exists, then second.
    How should i define a condition that if field doesn't exists,  the second mapping should be executed.
    Can any body please suggest.
    Thanks,
    Kalyani.

    Thanks for your replies . But this condition is not working for our requirement .
    Below is our exact requirement.
    Source structure  is the xsd which we have imported into ExternalDefinition.This External Definition has 2 other external references(namespaces are also different).
    The field which we need to check is in the external reference. This field is not visible in interface determination condition editor.
    We have manually added the xpath condition in the interface determination.
    1)The Xpath for EXIST condition looks like
    (/p1:ABC_Responses/p1:ABC_Response/p1:ABCResponses/p1:ABCResponse/p6:Fault/p6:ID EX).
    This is working fine.
    2) The XPath for Not Exists condition looks like
    (/p1:ABC_Responses/p1:ABC_Response/p1:ABCResponses/p1:ABCResponse/p6:Fault[not(p6:ID] EX).
    This is not working.
    Hope iam clear with the requirement now.
    Edited by: kalyani uppari on Feb 11, 2010 10:30 AM

  • XPATH condition in Receiver Determination in PI 7.1

    Hi all,
    I'm doing a Inbound 850 Scenario (no BPM involved)...based on the condition for (/LIST/S_ISA/S_GS/S_ST/S_BEG/D_353 = 00) its should either create ORDERS.ORDERS05 or create ORDCHG.ORDERS05 if (/LIST/S_ISA/S_GS/S_ST/S_BEG/D_353 = 04)...I'm giving the condition in interface determination and multiline selected in the Xpath editor
    I'm using PI 7.1 and irrespective of the condition it always creats Orders.Orders05, I have 2 receiver agreements also for both receiving interfaces...
    Any solution on how to debug?
    Thanks,
    Srini
    Edited by: Srinivas Davuluri on May 12, 2009 10:56 AM

    I forgot to give the prefix...mistake from my side

  • Xpath condition in Receiver Determination

    Hi  Gurus -
    I want to implement a condition, For QUALF=01 AND ORGID=ORG1, then only it should go to some receiver and otherwise some other Receiver.However when i implement this using context object/Xpath, The condition happens to be true which should not be true for following structure as No segment contain "QUALF=01 AND ORGID=ORG1".
    It happens to be true probably because one of the QUALF=01 and one of the ORGID=ORG1, however i doesnt want like that
    - <E1EDK14 SEGMENT="1">
      <QUALF>01</QUALF>
      <ORGID>ORG2</ORGID>
      </E1EDK14>
    - <E1EDK14 SEGMENT="1">
      <QUALF>02</QUALF>
      <ORGID>ORG1</ORGID>
      </E1EDK14>
    - <E1EDK14 SEGMENT="1">
      <QUALF>01</QUALF>
      <ORGID>ORG2</ORGID>
    Expert opinions are invited.
    Regards.
    Jeet,

    Hi Jeet,
    Your Condition should be as
    <b>/p1:ORDERS05/E1EDK14/QUALF=01 AND /p1:ORDERS05/E1EDK14/ORGID=ORG1</b>
    and not as <b>(/p1:ORDERS05/E1EDK14[QUALF="01" and ORGID="ORG1"] EX )</b>
    To acheive this,
    1. Go to condition editor in the RD
    2. Insert a new expression clicking on the + button at the top left.Now u will find the operation AND between the two condition
    3. In both the condition line select the respective XPath of the node and specify the matching condition.
    It should look like..
    Left Operand                                     OP    Right Operand
    /p1:ORDERS05/E1EDK14/QUALF       =           01                   AND
    /p1:ORDERS05/E1EDK14/ORGID        =          ORG1                 
    Regards
    San

  • XPATH condition in receiver determination.. Sum one of the filed

    Hi,
    This is my input payload.
    segment "Record" will be coming multiple times.
    <ns:MT_Account xmlns:ns="urn:com.statement">
    -<BalanceRecs>
      - --<Record>
    <field1>CUA</field1>
    <field2>0.00</field2>
    <field3>324612.28</field3>
    <field4> LTD</field4>
        -----<numRecs>0</numRecs>
    </Record>
      --- <Record>
    <field1>CUb</field1>
    <field2>0.00</field2>
    <field3>324612.28</field3>
      <field4> LTD</field4>
      <numRecs>2</numRecs>
    </Record>
      --- <Record>
    <field1>CUc</field1>
      <field2>0.00</field2>
    <field3>324612.28</field3>
       <field4> LTD</field4>
    <numRecs>0</numRecs>
      </Record>
    </BalanceRecs>
    Requirement:
    I need to calculate the sum of field "numrecs".
    If the sum is 0, then pass to BPM(IP_BPM)
    If the sum is > 0 then pass to System B.
    I tried using the below blog from shabarish..
    /people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/06/07/customise-your-xpath-expressions-in-receiver-determination
    /p1:MT_ActBalance/BalanceRecs/BalanceRecord[sum(numRecs) = 0] EX        --> BPM
    /p1:MT_ActBalance/BalanceRecs/BalanceRecord[sum(numRecs) > 0] EX        --> SystemB
    Is there anything im missing .. kindly suggest.
    Thanks
    Deepthi.

    Hi Mark,
    It is working only for one receiver.
    i mean
    <numRecs>0</numRecs>
    <numRecs>0</numRecs>
    <numRecs>0</numRecs>
    The message is going correctly when the sum value is 0. ie to BPM.
    <numRecs>0</numRecs>
    <numRecs>2</numRecs>
    <numRecs>0</numRecs>
    OR
    <numRecs>2</numRecs>
    <numRecs>0</numRecs>
    <numRecs>0</numRecs>
    When I pass the above payloads, it is going to both the receivers.
    Since the total is 2, it should go only to systemB
    Any idea?
    This is working perfectly for enhanced receiver determination. I dont want to use enhance version for this simple case.

  • Using Xpath in Receiver Determination for greater than 500

    Hi,
    I am trying to use Xpath in the receiver Determination step and I want to check a field which is at item level and comes multiple times(0-unbounded) greater than 500.I tried with different options per SDN blogs,Xpath functions,but still I couldn't able to get what i am trying.I want to process the message when "quantity" is greater than 500,else I want to ignore the message with no errors.
    I gave like this    /p1: /LIST/item[quantity>499]     EX
    item loop is 0-unbounded and I need to check for every quantity.I selected the check box multi line as well.
    I played around different options,but still did not get what I am looking for.
    please suggest in this regard ,how I need to give the expression.
    Thank you,
    Sri

    Hi,
    For validating that the item field is occuring more than 500 times you need to choose the
    2.The exact XPath would be in your case *(/p1: /LIST/itemquantity[499]EX)*
    This means if the 500 th occurance of the item exists then the condition satisfies that is always true for 500 and above occurance of the item.
    Please revert if the suggestion proves to be helpful.
    cheers,
    Abhishek.
    Edited by: Abhishek  Paul on May 6, 2010 10:55 PM
    Edited by: Abhishek  Paul on May 6, 2010 11:02 PM
    Edited by: Abhishek  Paul on May 6, 2010 11:08 PM

  • Idoc structure not displying in XPATH at Receiver Determination..!!! Urgent

    Hi All,
    Doing Idoc to File Scenerio,
    In the receiver determination, I need to select the XPATH from the Idoc structure and by based on the GLN number which is coming in one of the segment, I need to pass to different receivers.
    Problem here is Iam not able to see the Idoc structure in the  XPATH to provide the condition.
    But when doing File to Idoc scenarios, Iam able to see the File structure.
    Any idea why IDoc structure is not displaying over here??
    Its a bit urgent for me..
    Waiting for your replys.
    Thanks&Regards
    Seema.

    Hi,
    This will help you now
    Hi,
    If you get the following msg while selecting the BS in Receiver Determination and if you are unable to view the Structure of the Source
    "Message interface does not exist in any software components installed on this business system"
    1) Open ID-----Double click on Business system that which u are using in the scenario
    2) Check whether you are able to see the SWC in the Othere attributes TAB
    3) If it is not there means goto SLD----Open the Technical System of R/3 by choosing Web as ABAp type
    4) Click on Installed Products TAB
    5) Click on Add New product and add your Product of the SWC whcih you are using for developement and Save it
    6) Then goto Business systems TAB in the same Technical systems window and click on the Business System appears in the window.
    7) Click on Installed products and Check the check box of your Product and then finally save that.
    Now you should be able to see the SWC in the Othere attributes TAB in ID
    Regards
    Seshagiri

  • Customizing XPATH in Receiver Determination

    Hello,
    I am using this blog to write conditions /people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/06/07/customise-your-xpath-expressions-in-receiver-determination and accordingly call the receiver (either Receiver_1 or Receiver_2), never to call both the receivers simultaneously
    I have a sample source message like:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <ConsumerDetails>
       <UserId>91200024:123456</UserId> To check if UserId starts with 91200024: or not
       <Date>20111301161459</Date> To check if length of Date is 14 or not
       <Billing>RC</Billing> To check if Billing has value RC/ SB or not
       <Type>SE</Type> To check if Type has value SE/ CWE or not
    </ConsumerDetails>
    Accordingly wrote the below conditions:
    Receiver_1 (Conditions working fine):
    UserId (MiddleOperator --> ContainsPattern) --> 91200024:*
    /ConsumerDetails[(string-length(Date)) = "14"] --> EX
    /ConsumerDetails[(Billing = "RC") or (Billing = "SB")] --> EX
    /ConsumerDetails[(Type = "SE") or (Type = "CWE")] --> EX
    Receiver_2 (Conditions not working; except 1st condition):
    /ConsumerDetails[not(starts-with(UserId,'91200024:'))] --> EX
    /ConsumerDetails[(string-length(Date)) != "14"] --> EX
    /ConsumerDetails[(Billing != "RC") or (Billing != "SB")] --> EX
    /ConsumerDetails[(Type != "SE") or (Type != "CWE")] --> EX
    Only Conditions for Receiver_1 are working fine; those for Receiver_2 are not. Can anybody please provide correct conditions to be written in the Condition Editor?
    ~Thanks.

    Hello,
    Have you tried using the condition as mentioned below:
    /ConsumerDetails[not((string-length(Date)) = "14")] --> EX
    /ConsumerDetails[not((Billing = "RC")) or not( (Billing = "SB"))] --> EX
    /ConsumerDetails[not((Type = "SE")) or not((Type = "CWE"))] --> EX
    i.e. use not() instead of '!' ??
    -Rahul

Maybe you are looking for

  • Asset purchase issue

    Dear Sapguys, while creating of asset purchase i am getting below error message You cannot post to asset in company code 1010 fiscal year 2010 Message no. AA347 Diagnosis A fiscal year change has not yet been performed in Asset Accounting for company

  • Hotter running windows xp?

    Has anyone noticed a difference? Got the 2.4GHz just last week and running boot camp. When I'm doing ordinary MS Office stuff in XP it's so hot it's uncomfortable to have my hands resting on it while I type and I don't ever hear fans running. When I

  • How to edit move rename files in iTunes

    how to edit move rename files in itunes

  • How to store photos in folders on iPad 2

    looking for the best way to sync photos to the iPad 2 without loosing the folder structure.

  • No Cursor for Pages

    Cannot type on new pages doc because there is nor cursor visible. Other programs fine. Any ideas? Thanks.