Xrandr why xorg virtual screen size limitation to 2048 x 2048 for i945

Hi i am wondering why has i945 2048x2048 Virtual screen size limitation (with active DRI) ....why i can't choose 4096 x 1024, because 4096 x 1024 = 2048 x 2048 it must consume same amount of video memory! Is there any patch, workaround or something, which will allow me to use dualhead for 1280x800 and 1920x1080 displays left/right of each other?

It's a hardware limit in the chip..
They seem to be working on a workaround but I wouldn't bet on it (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10479).

Similar Messages

Why did my screen size just default to 800 x 600?

Last evening I ran 'Check For Updates' and after a Adobe Reader update my screen reverted to 800 by 600. I don't write down what settings I use, I simply have been using whatever is comfortable. Now I cannot find it. I may have caused the default setting through an erroneous keystroke, but I'm not sure. How do I find the settings that I had say 24 or 36 hours ago and revert back to that screen size?
Thank you for any help!

Go into your system preferences and click on displays then make sure 1,920 x1,200 is selected.

Xrandr rotation: avoid panning of virtual screen

Hello everyone,
I am trying to set up my xorg.conf so that I can use xrandr rotation. I use the current binary nvidia driver.
In order to have a sufficiently large virtual screen for rotating, I added a statement defining my virtual screen size to be 1600x1600 px. Rotating the screen works fine.
The problem: I can pan / scroll around in the virtual screen with the mouse. A 1600x1200 desktop sits in an otherwise black 1600x1600 virtual screen. I'd like to disable this panning, so that I just have a "stable" 1600x1200 screen which I can rotate. How can I achieve this?
Many thanks in advance
Jürgen

It's a hardware limit in the chip..
They seem to be working on a workaround but I wouldn't bet on it (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10479).

Cannot adjust page width to fit to screen size on some PCs with IE

Hello friends, I am using APEX 4.0 and IE9 on different Windows 7 PCs . The page will go way off the screen to the right on one PC, and fits nicely inside the screen on another PC. This problem does not occur in Firefox on any PC. I have used Firebug to try to isolate the template or css settings. Using Theme_4, I have a breadcrumb region and 4 reports regions. One of the reports regions is in column 1 and 3 regions are in column 2. Display point is Page Template Body (3. Items above region content) for all the reports regions. The CSS is #themes/theme_4/css/theme_4_0.css. The template is One Level Tabs (Right Sidebar/Table Based). I tried various width="" using px and % under Edit Page Template-Definition-Body (see below). I tried style="width:800px" within the <div> tags. I have tried various other changes to theme_4_0.css and apex_4_0.css with no visible change to the page width on the obstinate PCs. I reset IE setting and deleted all personal settings on both PCs with no changes to either one, one fits on the screen and the other does not. The issue is that most of our users use IE so most of them will have to live with using the horizontal scroll bar to see the regions in column 2, unless we switch them all to Firefox (not a bad option, except that option works for our users only, we have no control over external browsers). I have tried suggestions from many discussion threads, as this problem has bothered us for quite some time. I know this is an IE problem, but any help is appreciated. Thank you.
"|" represents screen size and "-" is the regions/content for the "bad" PCs.
|----------|----------
The "good" PCs look like this:
|----------|
Peter
<div id="body">
<table class="tbl-body" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" summary="">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="tbl-main" width="100%">#REGION_POSITION_02##BOX_BODY#</td>
<td class="tbl-sidebar">#REGION_POSITION_03#</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>

BD...
I think your concerns are very reasonable. But I want to sort of refocus things a little bit for you here... it's not really a PC vs Mac issue... Rather, it's specifically an Internet Explorer issue. And you might say that this is synonymous...still 98% of the world uses IE, and you would be correct. Hopefully when the final version of IE7 comes out, it will finally embrace some of the modern day OPEN web standards without trying to make too many standards of its own (this is Microsoft, though).
Anyways, in the meantime, I guess we all try to make the best of it. It's very easy to conclude that iWeb is not a viable tool for you, as long as you have something else to "fall back" on. With my limited knowledge of all things HTML, I have no such luxury. Instead, I have put up a notice on my site for IE users only that the site might not look its best on IE....this notice also encourages IE users to use FireFox, which is very much like Safari and will in 99% of cases display your iWeb pages just like you expect. You can see how I've done this here (but you have to surf from IE)... http://blog.dirtdoog.com
I think many people in the PC world understand the limitations of IE. Certainly many don't, but you have to consider your likely audience, I guess. I believe that your website content is king. If your content is compelling enough to your intended audience, they will jump through hoops to see it in its full glory....but you have to make them aware of the problem. That's why I have chosen to take the path that I have taken.
Let me know what you think.

Question: T400 LED Screen Resolution Limited to WXGA?

Lenovo's website (US) is now only showing the following screen options for the T400:
14.1 WXGA TFT, w/ CCFL Backlight, Camera
14.1 WXGA+ TFT, w/ CCFL Backlight, Camera [add $30.00]
14.1 WXGA TFT, w/ LED Backlight, Camera [add $50.00]
14.1 WXGA TFT High Nit, w/ LED Backlight [add $120.00]
14.1 WXGA TFT High Nit, w/ LED Backlight, Camera [add $150.00]
Does anyone know why the LED screen is limited to WXGA and not WXGA+?
I'm looking to replace my T40p, and I'm not willing to go down in screen resolution.
Thanks,
RocketDude
RocketDude
T400s 2801-CTO

bananaman wrote:
There are 14.1 WXGA+ LED models available right now. Check the ThinkPad Reference (tabook) and search. That option is just apparently not available in CTO (Custom To Order) systems from the Lenovo Store at the moment.
This brings up the question: How can you order a pre-configured ThinkPad like those listed in tabook? Do you have to buy from a reseller? Why can't you order one from the online Lenovo Store? (Maybe you can, but it's not obvious to me how to do it, at least for the U.S. online store...)
Results of Your Ideal Business-Class Laptop survey, concluded 2009-07-29.
Did someone help you?
Say thanks! with a kudo.
Even better: Pay it forward, help someone else.

Set default screen size

when FFX launches it defaults to a screen size smaller then I'd like for default. Is there a way to change this?
I run it on an external 24" screen of an MBA running 10.7.5

Hello metropical,
Thank you for contacting Mozilla Support. That does sound frustrating. After doing some searching on our support site I've found that if you EXIT Firefox, the window will return to the same position it was in at the START of the last session. If you CLOSE Firefox it will save the position it was in at the END of the last session.
Please let us know if this solves your problem.
Cheers,
Patrick

PDF file size limited to graphics memory in Reader?

I've created a form (in LiveCycleDS) that allows for an unlimited number of photos to be loaded into it. I put an image into a subform that is duplicated every time a user clicks a button thus creating an unlimited number of images that can hold photos. I then extended it with Reader Extensions.
I'm running into a problem when I try to load a large number of photos into the form. It gets to about 47MB of images when it locks-up Adobe reader. I've been able to bring up other applications after the lock-up and when I switch back to Reader the artifacts of the other application are then displayed within Reader.
What is the practical limit to the size of a file created with LiveCycle? Is it tied to the amount of graphics memory a computer has? My machine has 2GB of RAM while my video card has only 384MB. I haven't been able to figure out if there is a file size limitation.

It's entirely normal for file size to increase. PDFs are much more compressed than print streams. For some printers the print size is almost constant (a huge bitmap), for others, it's a collection of graphical items and the size varies enormously. Rarely anything you can do.

Handbrake Screen Size

I made an interesting discovery on handbrake by accident last night. I put in Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom before I went to bed, adjusted all the settings but forgot to adjust the screen size. I've done this before and I usually would have just thrown it out. But this time I thought to trasfer it to my itunes and see if it would update to my ipod. Funny thing is...it did. So I'm going to try it with a couple of other movies today. The thing I'm thinking is that the 320 Screen size appears to make to differance for the ripping because the ipod will adjust it automatically. Anyone eles out there experience the same thing.

You can create videos of varying sizes, quality and bitrates, etc. and as long as the iPods specs aren't exceeded it will sync and play on the iPod (in 320x ???). If I understand this stuff correctly (and there is no guarantee that I do) when output is to a TV instead of the iPod screen the full resolution/aspect ratio, I.e. how it was recorded, is used resulting in a better picture on the TV.
If you exceed the iPods specs you can still play the video in iTunes but it will not sync to the iPod. iTunes will tell you that it didn't sync because it can not be played on the iPod.
I don't even know if all this is correct, I.e. a video done 480 wide looking better on TV than same video at 320 wide. I only mention width as usually you would leave aspect ratio "as is" so the height will vary, I.e. letterbox if the video is wide-screen.
So basically I'm just making myself a bunch of examples/samples that I will then play on various TV's. Hopefully I will then be able to decide on "my" method and settings for feeding my iPod.
I'm loosely documenting what I'm doing at
http://homepage.mac.com/heinz/2005/ in case it's of interest to others.
Feeding the iPod with video that is destined just to the iPod is relatively easy but as my primary usage will include the iPod being my mobile DVD library I want to be sure I create the feeds that will give best possible quality when displayed on a TV. I.e. I only want to build my mobile DVD library once.
It could all end up a waste of time. Maybe all my samples will look equally good but at least I'll know I tried.

Font size based on screen size

How to set different fonts for a textblock or for other controls in a page based on the screen resolution

Additionally, a MSDN documentation for you:
Supporting multiple screen sizes also
Scaling to pixel density for your reference.
--James
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Why does useful features are limited to few adapters?

Why does useful features are limited to few adapters?
For eg : File receiver CC has a option to stop Empty messages from being processed.
This is not available in SOAP receiver.
Is it possible to have a standard adapter module in SOAP receiver CC that will achieve this?
Regards,
Venkat.

>
Venkat A wrote:
> Why does useful features are limited to few adapters?
> For eg : File receiver CC has a option to stop Empty messages from being processed.
> This is not available in SOAP receiver.
Thats for SAP to answer i guess
Well initially there was no option in the File adapter to handle empty messages but as requirement grew and more and more customers/consultants were in need to handle such a functionality, SAP brought it in through a SP release
Maybe if this particular requirement of your finds popularity, then SAP might come up with a inbuilt solution
>
> Is it possible to have a standard adapter module in SOAP receiver CC that will achieve this?
>
> Regards,
> Venkat.
in you case why do you need to send the SOAP receiver a empty message??
If you need to handle it then the best is to do some workaround in the mapping and have a field in your target structure indicate that it is a empty message (something like a flag) and then do the routing logic based on this flag.

7.1: set Screen Size of PDA Emulator

We are developing a 7.1 PDA Mobile App using a client device with a bigger screen (VGA) than the emulator by default opens up with.
Is there a setting (eg. in MI\settings\core.properties) to define the screen size?
Thanks, Andre

Hi Sivakumar,
thanks for checking and letting me know.
In the meantime I installed a software to control windows: Autohotkey. The little script below resizes the window and enters my user id and password. It is one click only if you have a link in the QuickLaunch Tray.
Cheers, Andre
WinWait, SAP NetWeaver Mobile,
IfWinNotActive, SAP NetWeaver Mobile, , WinActivate, SAP NetWeaver Mobile,
WinWaitActive, SAP NetWeaver Mobile,
WinGetPos X, Y, W, H
WinMove SAP NetWeaver Mobile,,X, Y, 800, 400
MouseClick, left, 483, 78
Sleep, 100
Send, userid{TAB}password
MouseClick, left, 36, 34
Sleep, 100

[SOLVED] Virtual screen resolution in xorg.conf being ignored

I'm trying to configure a dual monitor set up but xrandr is telling me the max screen size is 1600x1600. I have already enterd a virtual resolution in xorg.conf.
Section "ServerLayout"
Identifier "aticonfig Layout"
Screen 0 "aticonfig-Screen[0]-0" 0 0
EndSection
Section "Files"
EndSection
Section "Module"
EndSection
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "aticonfig-Monitor[0]-0"
Option "VendorName" "ATI Proprietary Driver"
Option "ModelName" "Generic Autodetecting Monitor"
Option "DPMS" "true"
EndSection
Section "Device"
Identifier "aticonfig-Device[0]-0"
Driver "fglrx"
BusID "PCI:1:0:0"
EndSection
Section "Screen"
Identifier "aticonfig-Screen[0]-0"
Device "aticonfig-Device[0]-0"
Monitor "aticonfig-Monitor[0]-0"
DefaultDepth 24
SubSection "Display"
Viewport 0 0
Depth 24
Virtual 2832 1050
EndSubSection
EndSection
When I first installed Arch I was using the radeon drivers. I had no problem configuring my monitors the way I wanted. Now I'm using catalyst and getting errors.
Am I just doing something wrong?
Last edited by thetoxikavenger (2010-06-06 15:58:18)

I didn't really fix the issue with xrandr, but I did manage to get my dual monitors to work with Xinerama.

, why do I get "Color Finesse requires a minimum screen size of 1024x768 yet I've got two full HD sc

Hello,
Once I try to open 'full interface' on color finesse 3 on After Effects CS5.5, why do I get: "Color Finesse requires a minimum screen size of 1024x768" yet I've got two full HD screens?
Thanks.

In addition to Dave's suggestions, if you haven't already done so, restart your computer. All we do is ask the OS for the screen size and check against 1024x768. We've seen on Windows that the OS gets confused sometimes and reports an incorrect size. Restarting fixes that.
When checking your screen size, be sure to subtract the size of the toolbar and any similar add-ons you might be running. Those all reduce the usable screen size, and we've seen cases (mostly laptops) where that reduces the height of the screen below 768.
Bob Currier
Synthetic Aperture

Why screen size for iPhone simulator is still 480x320 pixels?

Hi,
I just upgraded my xcode to 4.2.1 so I have iOS SDK 5.0 now. However, when I create a project, the screen size in simulator for iPhone is 480x320 pixels. I was told the screen size for iPhone/iPad is now 960x640 pixels. Why in simulator it is still old size? What should I do to get the correct size or I am wrong and the actual device is still 480x320 pixels? Thanks.
Regards,
Taizhi

hi,
you change between "iPhone" and "iPhone retina" to simulate both physical resolutions.
For the project it doesn't matter because the logical resolution is still 320 x 460 "Points". The OS does most of the work for you.
I suggest reading: this: http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/2DDrawing/Conceptual/Drawi ngPrintingiOS/SupportingHiResScreens/SupportingHiResScreens.html#//apple_ref/doc /uid/TP40010156-CH15
Dirk

Why isn't there a mobile version / screen size for apple support communities ?

Why isn't there a mobile version / screen size for apple support communities ?

GOD!
I have the same problem and I've been trying to find a way around it for about...4 hours now. It's driving me nuts!
Is there anything that can be done? Can I really not use the nano b/c of my operating system? that seems nuts to me!
am totally bummed out as mine was a gift as well and now I have to return it...

Xrandr why xorg virtual screen size limitation to 2048 x 2048 for i945

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for