XYZ Domain rejected your message

Hello All,
I am running MS Exchange 2010 with DAG environment, since couple of weeks my Users are receiving below errors while sending emails to few different domains
xyz.com gave this error:
Please turn on SMTP Authentication in your mail client. :34464 is not permitted to relay through this server without authentication.
OR
xyz.com gave this error:
Please turn on SMTP Authentication in your mail client, or login to the IMAP/POP3 server before sending your message. :8852 is not permitted to relay through this server without authentication.
OR
xyz.com gave this error:
Relaying not allowed - REASON -
A problem occurred during the delivery of this message to this e-mail address. Try sending this message again. If the problem continues, please contact your helpdesk.
But after few retries message successfully send to destination.
There is also no changing activity performed in my Exchange Environment.

Hi,
According to your description, I understand that failed send message to few different domain with error “Please turn on SMTP Authentication in your mail client, …. is not permitted to relay through this server without authentication”.
If I misunderstand your concern, please do not hesitate to let me know.
I want to double confirm whether all user or special account experience this question. Which mail client are they used, OWA, Outlook? And also check the Outlook account type?
Basic on the error message, it’s caused by they do not enabled SMTP Authentication in your email client.
If they use Outlook client with POP3\IMAP account, please make sure they have enable “My Outgoing server (SMTP) requires authentication”, also check the Outing mail Incoming port setting.
Additional, run below command to double check the configuration of IMAP and POP3:
Get-ImapSettings -server <CAS server name>
Get-PopSettings -server <CAS server name>
Thanks
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
Allen Wang
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

Email failure - The following organization rejected your message

Hi,
We are getting failures in receiving emails from two client specifically (email from other clients are received successfully).
I can confirm that our SMTP server is configured NOT to check for reverse DNS.
I am attaching below the notification message from one of the failed emails.
Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:
[email protected]
A problem occurred during the delivery of this message to this e-mail address. Try sending this message again. If the problem continues, please contact your helpdesk.
The following organization rejected your message: xxxxxxxxx.com.
Diagnostic information for administrators:
Generating server: server519.appriver.com
[email protected]
xxxxxxxxx.com #<xxxxxxxxx.com #4.0.0 smtp;connection with xxxxxxxxx.com is broken> #SMTP#
Original message headers:
Received: by server519.appriver.com (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 5.4.8)
with PIPE id 517414458; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 06:10:06 -0500
Received: from [4.28.183.90] (HELO hullmail.hullco.com)
by server519.appriver.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.8)
with ESMTPS id 517414455 for [email protected]; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 06:10:01 -0500
Received: from ATL-EXMB03.HULL.COM ([2002:c0bd:6d9a::c0bd:6d9a]) by
atl-exht04.HULL.COM ([2002:c0bd:6d8c::c0bd:6d8c]) with mapi id
14.02.0298.004; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 07:10:00 -0400
From: Joe Failla <[email protected]>
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Subject: Test Submission
Thread-Topic: Test Submission
Thread-Index: Ac8945alas54Yp+WQ4eldDiAOdcpKA==
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 11:10:00 +0000
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.189.109.5]
Content-Type: text/plain
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Note-AR-ScanTimeLocal: 3/12/2014 6:10:01 AM
X-Policy: hullco.com - hullco.com
X-Primary: [email protected]
X-Note: This Email was scanned by AppRiver SecureTide
X-Note: VCH-CT/SI:0-2630/SG:1 3/12/2014 6:09:20 AM
X-Virus-Scan: V-X0
X-Note: Spam Tests Failed:
X-Country-Path: ->UNITED STATES->UNITED STATES
X-Note-Sending-IP: 4.28.183.90
X-Note-Reverse-DNS:
X-Note-Return-Path: [email protected]
X-Note: User Rule Hits:
X-Note: Global Rule Hits: G327 G328 G329 G330 G334 G335 G445
X-Note: Encrypt Rule Hits:
X-Note: Mail Class: VALID
Any assistance will be gratefully received.
Regards,
Vishakha

Hi Vishakha,
From the NDR information, the email was scanned by AppRiver SecureTide and then Spam Tests Failed. I think the issue is related to AppRiver SecureTide. If possible, I recommend you disable the AppRiver SecureTide temporarily and check the result.
Hope it helps.
Best regards,
Amy
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support

The following organization rejected your message: ESMTP.

Using SBS 2008 with Exchange 2007. I am getting this message from 2 different organizations, but only 2. All other emails go out fine. The bounce back occurs immediately, almost as if it does not even go out. This is a new problem that just surfaced. Any help would be appreciated.
Here is the detail of the error:
Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:
William O'Dell
An error occurred while trying to deliver this message to the recipient's e-mail address. Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver this message for you. Please try resending this message, or provide the following diagnostic text to your system administrator.
The following organization rejected your message: ESMTP.
Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007
Diagnostic information for administrators:
Generating server: PASVR.SynACT2.local
[email protected]
ESMTP #554 Transaction Failed Spam Message not queued. ##
Original message headers:
Received: from PASVR.SynACT2.local ([fe80::d93:c007:477c:9952]) by
PASVR.SynACT2.local ([fe80::d93:c007:477c:9952%10]) with mapi; Tue, 5 May
2009 11:34:43 -0400
From: Ken Compter <[email protected]>
To: William O'Dell <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 11:34:41 -0400
Subject: Sales Process Modeling Update
Thread-Topic: Sales Process Modeling Update
Thread-Index: AcnNlwIyBChaPXVdTSmQFWv+VlXTxw==
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/related;
            boundary="_007_F3D2E271BE29C3488DA401393DC0099B23F8498B52PASVRSynACT2l_";
            type="multipart/alternative"
MIME-Version: 1.0

Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:
[email protected]
An error occurred while trying to deliver this message to the recipient's e-mail address. Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver this message for you. Please try resending this message, or provide the following diagnostic text to your system administrator.
Diagnostic information for administrators:
Generating server: spamkiller.xxxxxx.com
[email protected]
#< #5.0.0 X-Spam-&-Virus-Firewall; host scoular.com.inbound15.mxlogic.net[208.65.144.12] said: 553 mailbox
[email protected] is restricted (Mode: normal) (in reply to RCPT TO command)> #SMTP#
Original message headers:
X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1335282850-024e85090bb090b0001-eby5OG
Received: from xxxxx.xxx.xx ([192.192.xxx.xxx.xxx]) by xxxxx
with ESMTP id M0Eaq5damCASV5SJ for <[email protected]>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012
10:54:10 -0500 (CDT)
X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: [email protected]
Received: from xxxxx.xxx.xx ([192.192.xxx.xxx.xxx]) by xxxxx
([192.168.10.5]) with mapi; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:54:10 -0500
From: "Patel, Arpit" <[email protected]>
X-Barracuda-BBL-IP: 192.xxx.xxx.xxx
X-Barracuda-RBL-IP: 192.xxx.xxx.xxx
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:54:09 -0500
Subject: test
Thread-Topic: test
X-ASG-Orig-Subj: test
Thread-Index: Ac0iMnxtNM4J+DwnSx66abOpTtjmuA==
Message-ID:
FBD890831CAF5048B00FFDDD02D55A640C04310C34@xxxxx
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_FBD890831CAF5048B00FFDDD02D55A640C04310C34xxxx_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Barracuda-Connect: UNKNOWN[192.xx.xx.xxx
X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1335282850
X-Barracuda-URL: http://192.xx.xx.xx:000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi
X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at rlcx.com
X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00
X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=9.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE
X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.95041
Rule breakdown below
pts rule name              description
0.00 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
Can someone help me? I am having a same issue and not sure what to look for.
Can someone explain how to check this stuff and where?
> Find out which DNSBL lists your IP address.
>
>sir now my Q. is that, where I can found my DNSBL oprator.
That information should be in the text of the 5xx or 4xx status code
returned from the server that rejected your e-mail.
Thanks again for looking.
Arpit Patel

Your message wasn't delivered due to a permission or security issue. It may have been rejected by a moderator

hi Guys
please help me out for below issue
Some time we are getting error while sending mail to particular recipient and getting below error
"Your message wasn't delivered due to a permission or security issue. It may have been rejected by a moderator, the address may only accept e-mail from certain senders, or another restriction may be preventing delivery.
The following organization rejected your message:"
but some mails are going without any issue

Hi,
First, please check if there is a transport rule blocking you from send email to the particular recipient. Besides, please check for any third party transport agents, I recommend you disable third party transport agents temporarily. If there is any AV/AS
scanning on your Exchange server, please disable it temporarily and test again.
If the issue persists, in order to troubleshoot the problem more efficiently, I need to clarify some information.
1. Did you send emails externally or internally?
2. How many recipients were affected?
3. From "Some time we are getting error while sending mail to particular recipient", do you mean all users couldn't send emails to the particular recipient or just some users of all couldn't send emails to the particular recipient?
Sometimes message tracking log is useful for us, to narrow down the issue, I recommend you check message tracking log for related error message.
Best regards,
Belinda
Belinda Ma
TechNet Community Support

Your message wasn't delivered because of security policies message after adding new company to our network

After adding a new acquistion company to our network the company is now receiving a undeliverable error message when trying to email Parent Company. The acquistion company is still hosting there own email. Emails do come
through sometime though. Odd thing is the part where it says "The following organization rejected your msessage because of relay. The server that is asking for relay has nothing to do with Exchange and is a webserver.
Your message wasn't delivered because of security
policies. Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver this message for you.
Please provide the following diagnostic text to your system administrator.
The following organization rejected your message: XXXXX08WEB02.
Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007
Diagnostic information for administrators:
Generating server: exch-srv.xxx.local
xxxx08WEB02 #550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for
Original message headers:
Received: from exch-srv.bb.local ([10.36.x.x]) by exch-srv.xx.local
([10.36.10.9]) with mapi; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 06:24:26 -0600
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 06:24:24 -0600
Subject: Fwd: BLASER
Thread-Topic: BLASER
Thread-Index: Ac9FAH8o48EjJULkQCyOFAKdwwLLcQ==
Message-ID: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
References: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_2E7BF3C7D4A34BBE8DA45714401F4470xxxxxxcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0

Hi,
Let’s try the following resolution:
Exchange 2007 server>EMC>server configuration>Hub Transport>Receive connector>properties>Network> add your new company server IP address in the tab “receive mail from remote servers that have these IP addresses”.
For more information, you can refer to the following article:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2006/12/28/3397620.aspx
If you have any question, please feel free to let me know.
Thanks,
Angela Shi
TechNet Community Support

Your message wasn't delivered due to a permission or security issue. It may have been rejected by a moderator, the address may only accept e-mail from certain senders, or another restriction may be preventing delivery

HI,
We are getting following error message for all users while sending mail to external but we able to receive mail from internet.
Your message wasn't delivered due to a permission or security issue. It may have been rejected by a moderator, the address may only accept e-mail from certain senders, or another restriction may
be preventing delivery.

Hi,
Please follow Luke and Shelly’s suggestion to check your SPF record and Send Connector configuration. Also you can post the complete NDR message(with NDR status code) here for further analysis.
If there is any updates, please feel free to let us know.
Thanks,
Winnie Liang
TechNet Community Support

Server rejecting outgoing message

All,
I have no idea why my mail server has started reacting the way that it has, but this is the situation. I am running a 3.6 Messaging server on Solaris 2.6. After a reboot recently, the server started rejecting certain outgoing emails that it claims to have bad return addresses. I am not sure what this error means and I cannot see a return address in the mail header. The error returned to the user is below:
This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason:
Your message was not delivered because the return address was refused.
The return address was '<[email protected]>'
Please reply to [email protected]
if you feel this message to be in error.
If anyone has any input, advice, or suggestions, I would greatly appreciate your help. The rejected emails seem to be going to the same 'set' of domains, but I cant find any details in the logs or error messages to point me in the right direction. Thanks,
Pete

If you go to Mail Preferences/Accounts and select the offending account, is it's own outgoing mail server selected? If not, select it and put a check in use only this server. I would also confirm all settings against:
http://www.apple.com/support/macosx/mailassistant/

Post CUPS 8.5(3) upgrade getting CUPC "did not receive your message because it could not be delivered".

I upgraded CUPS from 7.0(2) to 8.5(3) and now CUPC 7.1(1a) clients can’t chat each other, they now get the following message.
Rose, Bob did not receive your message because it could not be delivered. (3:14 PM)
Wireshark shows response back from CUPS server ip as 408 Request Timeout.
Only the server was upgraded, not the clients.

After several hours with Cisco TAC we found CSCsl63971 (case-sensitivity on proxy domain causes CUPC problems) and were able to resolve the issue so users can continue to use CUPC 7.1(1)

When PO rejected no message in inbox

Hi,
We are using workflow ws14000145. When PO is rejected no messages is visible in the approval ( buyer inbox) section. Any clues what will be the issue. Points will be rewarded for the suitable answers.
Ingen

Hello Autobots,
Check in SO16 transaction that notification are sent to home user mail (tab "sys. group").
It should solve your problem.
Regards.
Laurent.

Your message exceeds the maximum allowed by the server

After many years my Mail refuses to work properly:
This message could not be delivered and will remain in your Outbox until it can be delivered.
Your message has size 1,6 MB, which exceeds 1,0 MB, the maximum allowed by the server.
I created another account but problem remains.
I talked with my internet provider and the problem is only with Mail.
Thanks.

Is this for a .Mac account?
If so, check this link which the following was copied from.
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=25301
There is also a 10 MB maximum size for messages sent or received using the .Mac mail system.
There is nothing wrong with Mail and you would experience the same with any email client such as Mail on a Mac or a Windows PC.
Most ISPs and email account providers have the identical 10 MB overall message size limit for received and sent messages. In fact, I know several people who have a smaller overall message size limit such as 5 MB so this is not unusual.
Even if your ISP or email account provider for your email account has a larger overall message size limit, the overall message size limit must be under the recipient's overall message size limit imposed by their ISP or email account provider for their email account or your sent message will be rejected by the recipient's incoming mail server.
All message attachments must be encoded before being sent and decoded when received. Mail uses MIME 1.0 for attachment encoding/decoding which is the internet standard but a problem with MIME is it isn't very efficient.
The attachment encoding process increase the size of the pre-encoded file by roughly 50% or so. A 5 MB file (pre-encoded) will be roughly 7.5 MB in size after the attachment encoding process.

Rejected mail messages

Hallo
Recently I installed Sun Communication Suite with Messaging server included. I migrated to some test users to new installation and they report, that there are mail messages frequently rejected with explanation:
Thu, 20 May 2010 19:50:21 +0200 (CEST)
Temporary error from SMTP partner: smtp;451 See [http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html]
Error occured to webmail users and users with other mail clients. I searched for answer, but I still don't have I clue, how to change my mailer to avoid this.
Regards
Matej

Output from imsimta version is:
Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 64bit (built Apr 16 2009)
libimta.so 7u2-7.02 64bit (built 03:03:02, Apr 16 2009)
Using /opt/sun/comms/messaging64/config/imta.cnf (compiled)
SunOS mailstore 5.10 Generic_138888-01 sun4v sparc SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise-T5120
You are right. Delivery notice come later. Here is example of whole message.
Message-id: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 18:50:18 0200+
From: =?iso-8859-15?Q?=22Petja_Plau=A8tajner=22?=
+<[email protected]>+
To: Ana Filipov <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: dunaj
Your message has been enqueued and undeliverable for 2 days to the following recipients:
Recipient address: [email protected]
Reason: unable to deliver this message after 2 days
Delivery attempt history for your mail:
Thu, 20 May 2010 19:50:21 0200 (CEST)+
Temporary error from SMTP partner: smtp;451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.
Thu, 20 May 2010 11:50:20 0200 (CEST)+
Temporary error from SMTP partner: smtp;451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.
Thu, 20 May 2010 03:50:20 0200 (CEST)+
Temporary error from SMTP partner: smtp;451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.
Wed, 19 May 2010 19:50:20 0200 (CEST)+
Temporary error from SMTP partner: smtp;451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.
Wed, 19 May 2010 11:50:19 0200 (CEST)+
Temporary error from SMTP partner: smtp;451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.
Wed, 19 May 2010 07:50:19 0200 (CEST)+
Temporary error from SMTP partner: smtp;451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.
Wed, 19 May 2010 03:50:19 0200 (CEST)+
Temporary error from SMTP partner: smtp;451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.
Tue, 18 May 2010 23:50:19 0200 (CEST)+
Temporary error from SMTP partner: smtp;451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.
Tue, 18 May 2010 21:50:19 0200 (CEST)+
Temporary error from SMTP partner: smtp;451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.
Tue, 18 May 2010 19:50:19 0200 (CEST)+
Temporary error from SMTP partner: smtp;451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.
Tue, 18 May 2010 18:50:19 0200 (CEST)+
Temporary error from SMTP partner: smtp;451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.
The mail system will continue to try to deliver your message for an additional 5 days.
I don't see any additional information in whole message.
Regards
Matej

DPS Single Edition - what if Apple rejects your app?

If you pay for a single edition license and Apple rejects your application after viewing, where do you stand with Adobe?
Are you able to make the changes needed to the app, then rebuild and re-submit?
Is it like a professional, or enterprise edition where you can amend and fine tune your app (through builds and rebuilds) until it is perfect within Viewer Builder - but you're just limited to the one viewer app?
Thanks

Thanks Bob.
I haven't got any problems, this is just hypothetical at the moment.
Is there a limit to the amount of changes I want to make? Say I have built my folio, zipped it and placed it in the app in viewer builder. I see a couple of minor errors, so need to re-zip the folio and rebuild the viewer. Then I want to add another section (which requires another rebuild). Is that all doable? I'm just talking from real-life experience of digital publication development - I don't think our first viewer build has ever been the one we've pushed to Apple.

Auth.log - Rejected send message, 2 matched rules; type="method_call"

Hi,
i'm checking the /var/log/auth.log and I found out that there is this error message
Jun 9 20:19:56 localhost polkitd(authority=local): Registered Authentication Agent for unix-session:/org/freedesktop/ConsoleKit/Session2 (system bus name :1.23 [/usr/bin/gnome-shell], object path /org/freedesktop/PolicyKit1/AuthenticationAgent, locale en_US.UTF-8)
Jun 9 20:19:57 localhost dbus[513]: [system] Rejected send message, 2 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.23" (uid=1000 pid=861 comm="/usr/bin/gnome-shell ") interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" member="GetAll" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination=":1.1" (uid=0 pid=654 comm="/usr/sbin/console-kit-daemon --no-daemon ")
Jun 9 20:19:57 localhost dbus[513]: [system] Rejected send message, 2 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.23" (uid=1000 pid=861 comm="/usr/bin/gnome-shell ") interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" member="GetAll" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination=":1.1" (uid=0 pid=654 comm="/usr/sbin/console-kit-daemon --no-daemon ")
Jun 9 20:19:57 localhost dbus[513]: [system] Rejected send message, 2 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.23" (uid=1000 pid=861 comm="/usr/bin/gnome-shell ") interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" member="GetAll" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination=":1.1" (uid=0 pid=654 comm="/usr/sbin/console-kit-daemon --no-daemon ")
if think the problem is in /etc/dbus-1/system.conf
<deny send_type="method_call"/>
I'm tempted to change this to allow, but I won't as long as I don't understand why this deny-rule is implemented.
Last edited by miky76 (2012-06-09 20:41:06)

That deny rule is the default. Things in /etc/dbus-1/system.d override it. There's a ConsoleKit.conf file in there that describes what interaction ConsoleKit actually allows.
That said, ConsoleKit.conf also denies this access:
<deny send_destination="org.freedesktop.ConsoleKit"
send_interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" />
I don't know why this is denied - most likely it's to prevent private data from being stolen from console-kit-daemon in this way. I don't see any such private data stored in properties on ConsoleKit, though:
$ dbus-send --print-reply --system --dest=org.freedesktop.ConsoleKit /org/freedesktop/ConsoleKit/Session1 org.freedesktop.DBus.Introspectable.Introspect
method return sender=:1.5 -> dest=:1.14 reply_serial=2
string "<!DOCTYPE node PUBLIC "-//freedesktop//DTD D-BUS Object Introspection 1.0//EN"
"http://www.freedesktop.org/standards/dbus/1.0/introspect.dtd">
<node>
<interface name="org.freedesktop.DBus.Introspectable">
<method name="Introspect">
<arg name="data" direction="out" type="s"/>
</method>
</interface>
<interface name="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties">
<method name="Get">
<arg name="interface" direction="in" type="s"/>
<arg name="propname" direction="in" type="s"/>
<arg name="value" direction="out" type="v"/>
</method>
<method name="Set">
<arg name="interface" direction="in" type="s"/>
<arg name="propname" direction="in" type="s"/>
<arg name="value" direction="in" type="v"/>
</method>
<method name="GetAll">
<arg name="interface" direction="in" type="s"/>
<arg name="props" direction="out" type="a{sv}"/>
</method>
</interface>
<interface name="org.freedesktop.ConsoleKit.Session">
<method name="SetIdleHint">
<arg name="idle_hint" type="b" direction="in"/>
</method>
<method name="GetIdleSinceHint">
<arg name="iso8601_datetime" type="s" direction="out"/>
</method>
<method name="GetIdleHint">
<arg name="idle_hint" type="b" direction="out"/>
</method>
<method name="Unlock">
</method>
<method name="Lock">
</method>
<method name="Activate">
</method>
<method name="GetCreationTime">
<arg name="iso8601_datetime" type="s" direction="out"/>
</method>
<method name="IsLocal">
<arg name="local" type="b" direction="out"/>
</method>
<method name="IsActive">
<arg name="active" type="b" direction="out"/>
</method>
<method name="GetLoginSessionId">
<arg name="login_session_id" type="s" direction="out"/>
</method>
<method name="GetRemoteHostName">
<arg name="remote_host_name" type="s" direction="out"/>
</method>
<method name="GetDisplayDevice">
<arg name="display_device" type="s" direction="out"/>
</method>
<method name="GetX11DisplayDevice">
<arg name="x11_display_device" type="s" direction="out"/>
</method>
<method name="GetX11Display">
<arg name="display" type="s" direction="out"/>
</method>
<method name="GetUnixUser">
<arg name="uid" type="u" direction="out"/>
</method>
<method name="GetUser">
<arg name="uid" type="u" direction="out"/>
</method>
<method name="GetSessionType">
<arg name="type" type="s" direction="out"/>
</method>
<method name="GetSeatId">
<arg name="sid" type="o" direction="out"/>
</method>
<method name="GetId">
<arg name="ssid" type="o" direction="out"/>
</method>
<signal name="Unlock">
</signal>
<signal name="Lock">
</signal>
<signal name="IdleHintChanged">
<arg type="b"/>
</signal>
<signal name="ActiveChanged">
<arg type="b"/>
</signal>
<property name="idle-hint" type="b" access="readwrite"/>
<property name="is-local" type="b" access="readwrite"/>
<property name="active" type="b" access="readwrite"/>
<property name="x11-display-device" type="s" access="readwrite"/>
<property name="x11-display" type="s" access="readwrite"/>
<property name="display-device" type="s" access="readwrite"/>
<property name="remote-host-name" type="s" access="readwrite"/>
<property name="session-type" type="s" access="readwrite"/>
<property name="user" type="u" access="readwrite"/>
<property name="unix-user" type="u" access="readwrite"/>
</interface>
</node>
Note those properties at the end of that list, which are the same things you can learn by running ck-list-session.
If you want to change the deny to allow, you may as well do it in the ConsoleKit.conf line, so it's specific to this usage, rather than allowing any method call in the world called through dbus.
FWIW, I can reproduce this same error, trying to do it "by hand", though I don't use GNOME, as you do:
$ dbus-send --print-reply --system --type=method_call --dest=org.freedesktop.ConsoleKit /org/freedesktop/ConsoleKit/Session1 org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties.GetAll string:org.freedesktop.ConsoleKit.Session
Error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied: Rejected send message, 2 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.17" (uid=1000 pid=13892 comm="dbus-send --print-reply --system --type=method_cal") interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" member="GetAll" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination="org.freedesktop.ConsoleKit" (uid=0 pid=751 comm="/usr/sbin/console-kit-daemon --no-daemon ")

Cisco 5.0 "Your messages are not available now" after exchange 2010 and DC migration to a new host

Guys,
First of all, thanks for looking at this post. Hopefully you guys can help me out. My unity users, when dialing into voicemail are getting the message "Your messages are not available now".
Services in error state under the event viewer:
Event Type:   Error
Event Source:   CSAgent
Event Category:   Kernel Rule
Event ID:   256
Date:       7/29/2014
Time:       11:42:41 AM
User:       N/A
Computer:   UNITY
Description:
A packet with a bad transport layer header was detected. Reason: Illegal TCP reserved flags set using interface Wired\HP NC324i PCIe Dual Port Gigabit Server Adapter. TCP: 00.000.00.000/443->00.00.0.00/1241, flags 0x10. The operation was denied.
Event Type:   Error
Event Source:   CiscoUnity_MALEx
Event Category:   Error
Event ID:   30012
Date:       7/29/2014
Time:       11:44:27 AM
User:       N/A
Computer:   UNITY
Description:
An occurred which prevents successful Exchange access by CsBMsgConnector via MAPI.
This is typically an indication of configuration issues with Unity, Exchange, or the MAPI subsystem.
Verify that the Unity services accounts are granted the correct permissions and that there are no issues with installation. The SysCheck utility may assist in diagnosing the problem.
Event Type:   Error
Event Source:   CiscoUnity_Doh
Event Category:   Error
Event ID:   32013
Date:       7/29/2014
Time:       11:44:27 AM
User:       N/A
Computer:   UNITY
Description:
Doh logon failed due to messaging component logon error: 8004052eH
I found and followed to the letter:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice-unified-communications/unity/107323-unity-error.html
I also went ahead and ran GUSI with some mixed results under environment information:
SQL Version = Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2282: unknown SP
SQL Edition = Desktop Engine
Windows version = 5.2 Build 3790: Service Pack 2
Outlook is not installed on the local server
MAPI Provider : CDO Version - 6.5.8211.0
MAPI Shared Memory: (HKLM:SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows Messaging Subsystem\Applications\<process>\SharedMemMaxSize)
AvCsMgr : is set to recommended value
AvMsgStoreMonitorSvr : RegKey not found. Recommend add the key AvMsgStoreMonitorSvr and set DWORD SharedMemMaxSize with a value of 4194304 (decimal)
AvNotifierMgr : RegKey not found. Recommend add the key AvNotifierMgr and set DWORD SharedMemMaxSize with a value of 4194304 (decimal)
AvUMRSyncSvr : is set to recommended value
CsBMsgConnector : RegKey not found. Recommend add the key CsBMsgConnector and set DWORD SharedMemMaxSize with a value of 4194304 (decimal)
CsBridgeConnector : RegKey not found. Recommend add the key CsBridgeConnector and set DWORD SharedMemMaxSize with a value of 4194304 (decimal)
CsVpimConnector : RegKey not found. Recommend add the key CsVpimConnector and set DWORD SharedMemMaxSize with a value of 4194304 (decimal)
TCPChimney : Disabled
RSS : Disabled
*Pulled from UnityDB Configuration Table*
ExcludeAllReceipts : 0
ExcludeReturnReceipts : 0
DisableSearchFolderUse : 0
MinSearchFolderLifeHours : 1
OptimizeSearchFolderUse : 0
I tried following and deleting the Unity System Profile:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11249996/unity-501-exchange-2010-unable-logon-mapi-mailbox
But I am still scratching my head. Any direction will be appreciated.

Turns out that unity came back after all this. Maybe it just needed time. I think I answered my own question. Anyways, this post could serve for future reference.

How do you keep your message from appearring on a locked screen

how do you keep your message from appearring on a locked screen

Go to SETTINGS --> NOTIFICATIONS --> MESSAGES
Change "View in lock screen" to OFF
That should sort it for you.

XYZ Domain rejected your message

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for