YM problem with 9700

It starts few days ago. Till then everything was perfect. Some of my contacts in my YM list, can`t see what i`m typing. Anyone with same problem or any ideea how to solve it?
Thanks alot!

Hello,
I would recommend removing and re adding the contacts that are effected by this to test.
Thank you
-DrP
Come follow your BlackBerry Technical Team on Twitter! @BlackBerryHelp
Be sure to click Kudos! for those who have helped you.
Click Solution? for posts that have solved your issue(s)!

Similar Messages

Problems with KT4V and AtiRadeon 9700 Pro...

Hi all,
I have lots of problems with my current configuration with games (lock ups) and even in normal use. Also I'm not able to run 3DMark through to see with kind of results would I get. Car chase (high) gets very low fps and the nature test doesn't even work. I have tried different 4in1 drivers and BIOS versions. With 1.6 BIOS version I had lots of CRC errors (should be corrected in BIOS ver. 1.7 but in expense of data rate?). Does anyone have any suggestions so that I could for example go through the 3DMark even with the expense of performance?
I had those game lock up problems also earlier with KT7A-100 RAID + AtiRadeon 64 (3DMark worked) so I bought new graphic card (didn't help) and after that I bought the new mobo. I know my config is not the best in the world, but I think it should be enough to give some happy moments in ever so demanding games... for a while...
There is also one thing that is quite strange. In my display adapters there is two drivers for AtiRadeon (primary in AGP and secondary in PCI)? I'm not expert, but isn't that weird? I have tried installing different drivers again and again (also reinstalled OS) with no luck! Trying to delete the secondary one doesn't help...
Help..........!
My specs:
MSI KT4V (MS-6712) 4in1 Hyperion 4.45, BIOS ver 1.0
AMD TM 1.2 GHz CPU
ATX pro3 (300W)
WIN 98SE
512 MB DDR (333)
SAMSUNG 40 GB (5400 RPM)
SAMSUNG DVD
ATIRADEON 9700 Pro (Club 3D) Catalyst 3.0
Soundblaster Live!

the 9700 is the most powerfull vga to date and needs power evan more than a gf4 4600
i would lbe looking at some think like an antec true powe 430 watt psu not a basic 300 watter
with ati,s own cards you need revision 1.3 as well best i can recall,but yours is an oem so im not sure
a search for 9700 in this section will get you lots of threads

I have hp pavilian dv 9700 series dv9815nr model. probleme with motherboard

hp pavilion dv 9700, s/n [Personal Information Removed], p/n kn866ua, model dv9815nr.
facing problem with motherboard.
out of warranty.
i was told the hp 9700 series with amd processors is plagued with mother board problems,
what do i do now

You were told correctly. You can have it repaired by a service or replace the whole thing.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Laptop-Motherboard-Repair-HP-dv2000-dv6000-dv9000-/220775573543?pt=LH_Defaul...

Radeon 9700 pro problem with Far Cry game

When I playing far cry at High Deatils, after 5 minutes game will crashing, and i got graphic error message
I have Last update of official ati driver , and i tried OMEGA unofficial driver;
but problem still running.
Sys. Spcs.
Mobo MSI 865 Neo 2 P
CPU P4 3GHz HT
RAM 4x256 dual channel
Graphic Card Radeon 9700 pro 128MB/128Bit
PSU 480 Watt.

Game crashing could be caused by few problems, could be software or hardware. Assuming we're looking into hardware, I suggest you run MEMTEST for your RAM and see if your RAM is defected. Other than that, I can't think of any reason than power supply. But you stated you have a 480 W which should be sufficient. It could be a known problem with ATI on Far Cry? But if this's the case, ATI should be able to deal with it via Driver Update.
If it's software, this is broad. Does Far Cry have any patch?

Problems with ati radeon 9700

hi there,
since i recently upgraded my board to this helluva rocket... and reinstalled window i was unable to get my ati running stable with the board. it works perfectly with my other computers (p3 1ghz asus board, duron 900 with abit board, p4 2,4 with intel board)
and it has been working for 1 year in that intel board p4 machine.
but with the upgrade to the 875p neo i constantly get vpu recovery with standard catalyst drivers, and texture errors in games with modded omega drivers,
ive been reading about disabling agp 8x and stuff. but the bios doesnt have the option... and no other agp options.... (pretty crappy bios i think anyway...)
did anyone experience similar problems?
cheers
my config is
p4 2,53
875p neo
ati radeon 9700 tx
dual channel 1gb ddr 333

thanks for all the replys... gotta check that all out...
i have not intentionally overclocked my system... gotta take a look at that too...
as far as it goes for problems with the PSU, i got a zalman ZM400B-APS 400 Watt PSU some silent mofu (my machine never was more silent this should be enuff for a 9700 (though i have 3 120gb and one 160gb dvd burner and 9 fans installed (including cpu fan) ) maybe ill turn off some of em... (who needs less than 30degree celsius anyway in a rig...)
regarding reinstall of XP, yes i formatted HD and reinstalled XP then.....
the fresh install is right now waiting for me to return home after work.. lets see how it will work... with the tips you all gave me....
btw i read in another posting that adding your rigs specs is the way to go in here...
by searching the forums for problems with radeon cards cards it delivered all those topics where people have a radeon or 9700 in their specs...
maybe search should have a tick box to exclude or include specs in searches... would make things more convenient for searching and not bothering people with already extensivley discussed stuff...
cheers

NEW Information with 9700 issue

I have been following the issues with the 9700 pro cards for some time now. I have read all the threads on this board and seen no fixes yet that work. I HATE to say it but everyone is barking up the wrong trees for this problem. As you read this and check your own system I'm sure that you will come to the same irritating answer that I have. I purchased my first ATI Built 9700 pro at first release in the stores. After installing I experienced distorted graphics and lock-ups. I then started hunting for a fix. Tried all the bios flashes, drivers and VIA 4in1's. all came up with the same result so I called ATI they said that it might be the card so I went back to the store and got another ATI built 9700 pro card and yet had the same issues. Then I go and get Gigabytes MAYA 9700 pro card. Now there is no more distorted graphics (NOTE to ATI you may have something that you can learn from Gigabyte) but I still get lock ups. So then I hunt down drivers and bios flashes from Omega which has been modifying drivers as long as I can remember. They did not work either. I also tried different motherboards and no change. So I conclude that VIA, MSI and ATI are not at fault for this problem. Although with this info may be able to come up with a solution.
Now I start digging hard into my system and OS yet to find the real blame. I found that my agp and sound are sharing the same IRQ. Now wether you know it or not you cannot change IRQ settings with XP. So I disable my sound and retest and get outrageous results. My frame rates increased and benchmarks raised by almost half. Numbers that were not even achieved in ATI's tests. So then I install a different sound card and it put it on IRQ11 and moved AGP IRQ form 16 to IRQ11. BACK TO SAME PROBLEM. I have alot of free IRQs and also have disabled coms which open IRQ 3 and 4 also but do you think XP would change settings so they didn't share. NOOOOTTTTTTT!!!!! I did try the same system but with windows ME so I could set the IRQs myself and with having nothing sharing the same IRQ it worked GREAT!! The only option I see at this time is to re-install windows and disable the acpi which is the culpret behind all this and run standard PC HAL which means no more power control for ATX motherboards "THANKS BILL". No matter how you try XP wants to share AGP slot with a PCI slot. Now with my ATI 8500 it shares with sound but no problems but you have to remember that the 9700 is a new creature that performs like never before and I'm sure with the demand that it puts on the system anything else on the same IRQ will get lost or corrupt packets resulting in a system lock up. At the bottom I will provide a link to a bulletin by MS that discibes the way and also why XP handles the IRQs the way it does.
I would like you to try the same as I have and remove anything sharing the same IRQ as the 9700 pro and see if you get the same results as I have. I have tested 3 cards and four MBs and refuse to try any more products just to come to the same answer. I think you will all come to the same conclusion that I have. "Kill Bill".
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q252420&ID=KB;EN-US;Q252420

I was having the same problem with the 9700 pro on the KT400. was getting lockups and freezing everytime i tried to run a 3d game or benchmark. (solitaire ran sweet though). Even went as far as to buy a new mobo the a7n8x with nforce 2 chipset...low and behold the card worked fine...pity the board lasted about 2 hours then i had to send it back cos it was shafted...no post no nothing...ay well...
so i went back to my MSI kt4 ultra i tried so many combinations i was going blind but i think i finally found a combination that works....well for me anyway
im using
Catalyst 2.5
ControlPanel 6.13.10.6218
Via 4.45 hyperion
Fast write disabled in smartgart but enabled in bios dont ask me why but it works like that...i know it doest overwrite it but it works. also try this one. type smartgart into the run dialog, you get a new window not accesible through normal display properties. for some reason installing the catalyst drivers sometimes disables agp write and agp read which you can see here. click retest all then reboot smartgart will popup as soon as you reboot to let you know what the settings are now.
now its running sweet as a nut
getting 3DMark
13930 running normal
15928 overclocked FSB
not ruling out the fact that shared IRQ's maybe at fault but mine is still shared with my nic and not causing any problems.
like i said it worked for me.. just thought id let you know
KT400 MS-6590
XP 2400+
2x256 XMS 3000 DDR (333)
ATi 9700 Pro
Windows XP SP1
Catalyst 2.5, CP 6.13.10.6218
Via 4.45 hyperion
3dMark - 13930 - 15928oc

Genius needs to help! problems with my video card and system

Hey guys! I'm going to post my specs first so that you get a good idea of what I'm running on:
MSI Neo2 LS 865PE.....MAT=Slow
Pentium4 2.4C.....FSB=233=2.8C hyperthreading enabled ~>1.55V
Corsair TwinX 1gig PC3700.....memory on "AUTO" in BIOS with timings at 3,4,4,8 ~> 2.7V
Radeon 9700NP.....stock speeds ~>1.7V
AlienX case with 2 fan400 watt power supply and 6 case fans
Zalman Alum/Copper heatsink fan
1:I've had this motherboard for a few months now. I upgraded my video card from a nVidia Ti4200(128meg) to a Radeon 9800 a month ago, but I couldn't get it working at 8X AGP, no matter what voltages I threw at it. I returned it for a Radeon 9700NP hoping that it would work, but it still won't.
I'm using BIOS 1.9 and since there is no option to select your AGP speed, I could only try using ATI's drivers. Once booted into Windows, there is a slider you can move to select you AGP speed. On my machine It says that It has performed some tests and has concluded that AGP 4x is the best for my system....but my system supports AGP 8X!
I've moved the slider over to 8x (which requires a reboot) at least 5 times with each card but the slider refuses to move past 4xAGP after the reboot.
2: My second problem: I had an old stick of KingMax PC3200 and decided to buy 3 more sticks. Unfortunatly, the 3 I bought did not match the one I had, so I only put 2 of the new sticks I bought into my system. Immediatly, My system would crash, lock up, files were corrupt, and I got PLENTY of blue screens of death with a long message containing: 0x0000007 with all these other numbers and "0"s. I did a search online and found out I had a hardware incompatibility problem. I never got this with my old stick of ram.
I returned the 3 sticks of Ram and replaced them with the Corsair. Put my new Radeon 9700 in, formatted my hard drive....and within 24 hours, my system locked up 3 times, rebooted itself 5 times, and gave me the same BSOD as mentioned above with the same long message.
I didn't change anything except for the memory and the video card. I've been wanting to overclock, (thats why i bought the faster memory ) but I'm not sure what to do at this point.
I have my FSB at 233 but I'm scared to go any higher because of previous system instability at stock speeds. My RAM was running on 400 and MAT=Turbo with the most relaxed timings at 3,4,4,8.
I've given myself hours of sleepless nights formatting when my system wouldnt boot into windows; overclocking....etc. I NEED HELP. PLEASE. PLEASE. Anything could work at this point.
I'm trying to get more info on how to run my system at a 5:4 ratio, also.
If anyone has problems like me or knows what could be the problem with my system, please reply to this post, it would help me a lot. I've been trying to fix these problems for a few months now so anything is greatly appreciated.

Thanks a lot to you guys that responded. I brought my computer home this past holiday and I want to let you know where I stand as of now. I guess this thread is like my blog for my computer. I want to clear some things before my first post makes everyone confused.
1- I have only 2 sticks of memory in my system: the Corsair PC3700 TwinX 512x2
I returned the 3 KingMax I bought, and still keep my old stick just in case.
2- I am using the 400 watt power supply that came with the case. I read some reviews of the case and I know the reviewer did not have problems with the power supply. In my BIOS, there are some voltages it is weak on. Lets say: it it should be 5.00+, my power supply will be feeding it 4.96v or something like that, but I dont know, or think, that is a major problem...
3- My computer will refuse to boot if memory speeds are set at anything below 400. SO....if I want to use a 5:4 ratio and have to set my memory speeds to "333" in BIOS, my system refuses to boot.
4- This morning, I did manage to overclock my FSB to 250. Specs are as follow:
Memory Timing @3,4,4,8,4.....speed set at "AUTO".....MAT at "SLOW"
MY 2.4C's FSB was raised to 250 = 3.0gig
AGP/PCI frequency: 67.xx/3x.xx (cant go any lower)
CPU voltage: 1.5500
Memory voltage: 2.75
Video Card voltage: 1.7
Everything was fine for the whole day until I heard something click in my computer around midnight, and then seconds later, my computer froze and made a continuous beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeep. (you can imagine)
This "click" and system crash has been plaguing me for months now. I dont know whay it happens. I was just using AIM when I heard the click and my heart stopped.
My memory speeds have been set to "AUTO" even at the FSB of 250. But I don't know if this still means my system is at a 1:1 ratio. I know the BIOS then adjusts the memory to work at 500 if my FSB is 250...so I assume it is? I love 3gig, but somehow I feel that 2.8 is faster, since the FSB=233 running parallel to my memory, also at 233
A FSB of 250 is good enough for me, that's what I've been waiting 6 months for. If anyone knows how to set other ratios to achieve a FSB of 250+, please let me know, but as I said, my memory won't boot if its set at "333"

Having Problems With The Neo2 ? Read This!!!!

Hi,
i just bought a neo2 motherboard, with a p4 2,6 HT and 512 mb Kingston hyper ram ( 2 peaces of 256, else it won't use the dual bandwith :D)
In the beginning everything seemed fine, until i got some sudden reboots and other vague stuff. I read it could be the SB audigy messing things up. I removed the card and windows Xp pro runs fine now. no more sudden reboots or explorer not resonding crashes.
But, i still had problems with games crashing. I got reboots. After i set the "automatic reboot after crash" to false, i got blue screens or lock-ups in my games.
I wondered what it could be. Then i started to put my videocard ( a radeon 9700 pro 128 mb) in agp 4x mode instead of agp 8x! Now my games run without crashes, but benchmarks are not that high. 4780 marks with 3dmark 2003.
I think i will send msi and Ati a mail concerning this problem. I don't know if it is PSU related. Maybe the videocard demands a little more power in agp 8x mode.
Well, having probs with you're NEO2 ??
remove the sb Audigy and turn the agp back to 4 using smartgart ( it's located in you're display settings screen ).
First i tought it was a PSU related problem, because i swapped my 350 Watt enermax with a Q-tec 400 watt psu. The 400 watt PSU died while i was gaming. Maybe the enermax is the better PSU :D So, it could still be a PSU related problem. Maybe the agp 8x settings demands a lot more from you're psu. Anyway, i'll receive a 550 watt Antec PSU soon, so i can check this out....
Btw. I cant run the motherboard in anything better than "slow" mode. In all other modes Xp won't boot. I haven't tryed it since the AGP is at 4X, but i don't think it will matter.
Regards,
Welcome to the real world NEO :D

Ok.....
i raised the memory voltage setting in the bios from 2.65 to 2.8 and the agp voltage from 1.5 to 1.7
Everything seems fine, but games crash back to the desktop now without an error message or the either lockup.
Whatever i do, i can't make the mobo crash in anything but games!
Btw. the following message caught my attention, when i ran f1 2002 with directx 8.1. Since i have directx 9, i haven't seen it anymore. Maybe because the ati-drivers are made for directx 9....
// Watchdog Event Log File
LogType: Watchdog
Created: 2003-10-04 02:02:53
TimeZone: -60 - West-Europa (standaardtijd)
WindowsVersion: XP
EventType: 0xEA - Thread Stuck in Device Driver
// The driver for the display device got stuck in an infinite loop. This
// usually indicates a problem with the device itself or with the device
// driver programming the hardware incorrectly. Please check with your
// display device vendor for any driver updates.
ShutdownCount: 9
Shutdown: 0
EaRecovery: 1
EventCount: 2
BreakCount: 2
BugcheckTriggered: 1
DebuggerNotPresent: 1
DriverName: ati2dvag
EventFlag: 1
DeviceClass: Display
DeviceDescription: RADEON 9700 PRO
HardwareID: PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_4E44&SUBSYS_00021002&REV_00
Manufacturer: ATI Technologies Inc.
DriverFixedFileInfo: FEEF04BD 00010000 0006000E 000A18EA 0006000E 000A18EA 0000003F 00000008 00040004 00000003 00000004 00000000 00000000
DriverCompanyName: ATI Technologies Inc.
DriverFileDescription: ATI Radeon WindowsNT Display Driver
DriverFileVersion: 6.14.10.6378
DriverInternalName: ati2dvag.dll
DriverLegalCopyright: Copyright (C) 1998-2002 ATI Technologies Inc.
DriverOriginalFilename: ati2dvag.dll
DriverProductName: ATI Radeon Family
DriverProductVersion: 5.2.3790.2
I wish i had another videocard to test. My radeon 9700 pro is getting suspicious...
Regards,
The real world

Isolating problems with MPEG2 VBR "best"

There have long been discussions here around problems with the quality of MPEG2 compression with Compressor v2.x, usually difficult to quantify or "solved" with "It doesn't work, use something else" such as a different product, Compressor v1 or a Quicktime MPEG2 export component. Maybe I'm an optimist, but I have to believe that someone who owns the code behind the Compressor product really does care to improve the quality of the compression, and is just waiting for a decent test case to figure-out what everyone is complaining about.
That in mind, I would like to propose that the most visible problems I've seen can be isolated to something to do with what is done when switching from "VBR" compression to "VBR best" compression, either in 1-pass or 2-pass mode. I would be curious if others who have had similar quality complaints could also check if they are using "VBR best" compression, such as the various default presets for "DVD: MPEG2 best quality..." which use "2-pass VBR best". In short, it seems as though one can get rid of the most serious artifacting problems by taking a "best quality" preset and changing the quality from "2-pass VBR best" to simply "2-pass VBR" (and similarly for 1-pass).
My own example: I've taken a short clip (less than 30 seconds) from the start of a recent home movie and published it along with some results on my iDisk's Public folder (Finder > Go > iDisk...): member name "dickermn" [sic], with no password. There you will find the folder CompressorTest, containing...
-> 2006winter - a self-contained QT movie with the DV source material.
-> dualG4 - a folder with the results of Compressor's MPEG2 compression with various settings, as run on a dual-1GHz G4 system.
-> coreDuo - a folder with the results of the same settings as above, but with Compressor run from a coreDuo mini.
-> *.png - two pairs of window-capture shots showing the same frames as compressed with "VBR" and "VBR best" settings.
Background: after having various odd and intermittent problems with MPEG2 compression results, I've used the recent upgrades to start with a clean slate: on the G4 system I ran Software Update, then removed all the components of DVD Studio Pro 4, Compressor and Qmaster, along with all preferences, application support files, frameworks, receipts, etc, as recommended in these web pages to remove these programs, then did a full install of my unversal upgrade to Final Cut Studio, and re-ran Software Update. This got me up to the current ProApps updates and Compressor v2.3.
Using only Compressor's default presets, selecting "DVD: Best Quality 150 minutes - 4:3" (2-pass VBR best, 3.7Mbps average rate), gives results with very visible artifacting. Using this same preset but changing the quality to "2-pass VBR" appears to clear up the most visible problems. Similarly, selecting "DVD: Fastest Encode 150 minutes - 4:3" (1-pass VBR) gives good results, but changing the preset's quality to "1-pass VBR best") produces visible artifacting.
For the purposes of testing, I also installed just Compressor on my coreDuo mini - a clean install - then ran Software Update to bring this to Compressor v2.3. Running the same tests as above on the Intel-based machine produced similar artifacting problems when selecting "best quality", but in different places in the media than on the G4. Using the same quality settings as above, but moving the average bitrate down to 3.0Mbps has similar behavior, but the artifacts are just more pronounced, and using a default preset with higher bitrate (5Mbps average, not included here) the artifacts are still quite visible, but less pronounced. From the 3Mbps results on the G4, the still frames captured show good examples of the problems at hand, though the artifacts are much more visible with the video in motion. These are the examples described below.
The clip shows some still titles against a still, horizontal-blurred background. At the end of the titles, the blurred background "un-blurs" and the motion starts: a horizontal pan, a wipe transition, and a downward pan. The subject is all falling snow, trees, our back deck, my son and me. The footage was taken with a consumer-grade Sony handheld camcorder.
The problems first noticable in the video appear as a blockiness to the images, particularly notable against the floor of snow where the image shifts visibly to different intensities of gray/white as the camera moves. More severe are blocks which don't move correctly with the camera, at first visible as a jerkiness to the opening background as it un-blurs, but more pronounced in the trees and decking during the downward pan at the end.
At about 14s is a good still of the blocking artifacts, seen here in the 1-pass VBR still frame. Note the large blocks in the snow in the "best" encoding, which are small enough to be lost in the noise for the "not-best" encoding. These shimmer between the different shades of gray as the camera moves.
At the last half of the clip, as the camera pans down, parts of the trees appear to jump independently of their branches. This is very clearly visible around the straight-lines of the railing in the lower part of the frame as the clip ends. The still is from about 23s into the clip, and you can see a block of the railing in the lower right which has clearly jumped-above the rest of the railing. Interestingly enough, this is the correct placement for those pixels in the next frame (as the camera continues to pan downward). In each of these "jumpy" cases, it would appear as though blocks of pixels show-up one frame early, and their surrounding blocks catch-up in the next frame (while these hold still). Again, when using the same settings without "best" quality, the jumping does not occur.
Note that with each pair of still (png) images you can group-select the pair and double-click to open them both in Preview, which allows you to toggle back-and-forth easily between the "best" and "not-best" versions. Comparing the two, you can easily spot several blocks in the frame which shift relative to their surroundings.
While I am aware that MPEG2 at low bitrates is a complicated thing (though I will leave open for debate how low 3-4Mbps is in today's world), and consumer-grade video has lots of noise which the encoder has to dance-around, I do believe it is fair to assume that the "best" settings should give visibly better results than their faster "non-best" counterparts, all else being equal - at the very least, the results should not be visibly worse. It is worth noting that the "best" VBR settings do appear (subjectively) to give better contrast or color-depth, so clearly something right is going-on - I just have to believe that there is something going awry in the whole process which creates artifacts negating the other benefits, but which, with any luck, could easily be fixed.
Please post with your comments, experiences or similar issues... or exactly what is the proper way to get this information to someone who could fix it?
dual 1GHz G4 + coreDuo mini Mac OS X (10.4.8) Compressor v2.3 / Final Cut Studio (univseral)

Well, I've found one more piece to this puzzle: hardware graphics accelerators.
In short, I tried this same test running Compressor on my G4 PowerBook (with Radion Mobility 9700) and got better results. The terrible blockiness and pixelation problems seem - dare I say it - gone from the MPEG2 video. In this regard, the video compressed as both the default "2-pass VBR best" and the same preset adjusted to use "1-pass VBR best" both looked cleaner than any of the VBR "not best" encodings produced on this machine, or either of the others.
Unfortunately, we're not completely out of the woods: the problems evidenced later in the clip - blocks which appear displaced in space/time for one frame - are still there, though they have moved to different locations in the frame.
This gets me to thinking: my PowerBook is just barely past current muster in terms of hardware-accelerated graphics (enough to run Motion, for example), whereas my other two machines are not (NVidia GForce4Ti & mini's Intel graphics). So this starts to get to the root of "If these presets don't work, why does Apple label them best - or distribute them at all?" I'm going to hazard a guess that there are various pieces to the codecs which can take either a software-only path or a hardware-accelerated path, and the bugs seen here exist only in the software (non-accelerated) path. Anyone testing on the latest top-notch hardware with a fancy-shmancy graphics card wouldn't go down that path and see any problems. And the problems are subtle enough that they'd even slip by the occasional testing of the slower path.
So now I'm out to find a more-current-than-my-PB graphics card to run the test, to see if I can get rid of the other problem. Updating to Compressor v2.3 got rid of most of the problems, and if buying new hardware is all it takes to fix MPEG2 compression, I might just spring for it - and hey, I'd get to run Motion, too.
So anyone out there with a whiz-bang graphics card care to run these tests and compare/contrast with what I've got here? I might know someone with a new MacBookPro, which I hear has a pretty current graphics chip in it...

Problems with car charger

I dont think i have read anything like this on the forums yet. Im on my second torch and although i like it a lot being (personal opinion) best blackberry yet (functionwide) , I feel it has some issues that are making me think a lot. I had a problem with the first one, i was charging it in my car (original BB charger) and some times i would see the lighting icon with the phone charging and sometimes not. I wanted to know if it was charging or not, so i tested for minutes looking at the battery % and nothing. Then the phone started to overheat and was not charging anymore, i took it to best buy mobile where i purchased it and they gave me different car chargers to test it. I did test it but i told them that my charger was orgiunal blackberry accesory and that i charge a 9700 and a 8520 from my wife. Nothing happened, they gave me a new phone. With the new one i noticed the b atter life was superb, was way better. but after 4-5 days (yesterday) the battery went dead at 5pm with slight use on the day, i tried charging the cellphone while eating, so i left it charging in the car and when i returned the phone was hot and not charging. Im really confused
Things i know>
1. its not the car charger, its charging other BB fine and its original accesory
2. Its not the lighter in my car cause i also charge other phones
please advice

I too am on my second torch in 8 days. I am also having a problem with the car charger. The lightning bolt goes off while charging, especially when I am using AT&T Navigator. The second phone is not as bad as the first one was, but I don't know how well it will do in the weeks to come.
I had this same problem with my original AT&T Blackberry, the 8900. In that case, a battery swap solved the problem. With the Torch, I really don't know what is going on, but this is a serious problem because I use the AT&T Navigator all the time in my business and I have to keep my battery charged.
I hope Blackberry recognizes that there IS a problem and fixes it.

Sync problem with calender - outlook 2010

Hello
I've a problem with the settings of the synchronisation of my calender. I am able to sync 2-ways on contacts - in these settings I am able to choose outlook express & than 2 ways synchronisation. I cannot choose this kind of settings for my calender.
I'm using: windows 7 with outlook 2010.
I've downloaded the latest version of the Black Berry Desktop manager.
Hope anyone can help me...
Vanessa

Hello,
BradleyDIngram wrote:
outlook calender 2010 does not sync with bold 9700.
Wrong...while it may not be working for you for one reason or another, your statement as written is not accurate.
BradleyDIngram wrote:
Are they going to make a fix for this?
They already did...it's called BlackBerry Desktop Software 6.0.
BradleyDIngram wrote:
Is it possible to download BB 6.0 to bold 9700 so outlook 2010 can sync?
Nope...the device OS 6.0 has only been released so far (I think) for the Torch. And device OS 6.0 and Outlook 2010 are not linked as far as this issue is concerned.
Please feel free to post some specifics about the issues you are having and hopefully someone will be able to assist.
Cheers!
Occam's Razor nearly always applies when troubleshooting technology issues!
If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the button inside of their post. Please click here and read, along with the threads to which it links, for helpful information to guide you as you proceed. I always recommend that you treat your BlackBerry like any other computing device, including using a regular backup schedule...click here for an article with instructions.
Join our BBM Channels
BSCF General Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

Problems with original wall charger

I have problem with my wall charger. It can't charge my iphone, however it can charge without problems other iphones. My iphone can charge via notebook. Anyone have similar problem? Software is 2.0, iPhone is 2G.

My PlayBook charger works flawless with my Torches, 9700, 8520, HS 500, HS 700, VM 605.
If its wonky with two of them, might be the charger.
Click here to Backup the data on your BlackBerry Device! It's important, and FREE!
Click "Accept as Solution" if your problem is solved. To give thanks, click thumbs up
Click to search the Knowledge Base at BTSC and click to Read The Fabulous Manuals
BESAdmin's, please make a signature with your BES environment info.
SIM Free BlackBerry Unlocking FAQ
Follow me on Twitter @knottyrope
Want to thank me? Buy my KnottyRope App here
BES 12 and BES 5.0.4 with Exchange 2010 and SQL 2012 Hyper V

MS6712 Video and LAN problems with Windows 98SE

Can anyone help please with a problem that’s been baffling me for weeks.I
The computer in question is a TIME Powerstation with AMD 2600+ processor with 1024MB RAM, Nvidia Geforce FX5200 and Windows XP Home.
Have set this computer to Dual Boot to Windows 98SE (Using Acronis OS Selector software).
My problem is that after many attempts, have so far been unable to successfully load drivers for the Nvidia GeForce FX5200 graphics card or to get the LAN function to work in Windows 98.
For the graphics card have tried a number of the more recent Nvidia Detonator Win98 drivers, all have either produced an error message (‘While initialising device IFSMGR: Windows Protection Error’) or a blank screen. Necessitating reverting back to the Standard VGA Driver with its maximum of 16 colours! The LAN function does not work at all in Windows 98SE, though it does in Windows XP – again suspect a driver problem.
The motherboard of this computer is a MSI Microstar MS6712. Have tried the ‘VIA Chipset 4 in 1 Driver’ to no avail. Are any more/different drivers required for Windows 98SE?
Would appreciate any advice in what originally was envisaged as a simple task: getting Nvidia Geforce FX 5200 graphics card and the motherboard’s built in LAN to run correctly on Windows 98.

I have your board.
1. Windows 98 won't recognize more then 512MB of RAM.
2. I had problems with the FX 5200 Ultra on this board. Occasionally when I booted the system, I would get a black screen right after the post when the OS was about to load. I've been hearing a few people lately stating problems with the KT4V-L mobo and the FX 5200 Ultra. I promptly returned the card and got a Radeon 9700 Pro instead. I have never been more happy since I made that decision. I will never put another Nvidia card in this mobo again. I also had issues with the Geforce4 MX card I had. I've come to the conclusion that Nvidia sucks.
3. Make sure your BIOS is updated to 1.9, and al lyour VIA drivers are updated. That may help you too.
That's all I can offer.

Problems with the Blackberry enhanced Gmail plug-in

Hi.
I use my Curve 8900 with a BES email account and added to this today a second Gmail account with support of the Blackberry enhanced Gmail plug-in.
But this works not fine, I can not see the sent messages in the Gmail conversations, they simply disapeare after they have been sent (and they have been sent really). The same is with the sent message flag - if I filter this flag, I see no messages, but in the reality they are there. If I look in the sent message folder in my Gmail account from the computer, I see all the sent messages.
Does anybody else have the some experience with the Gmail enhanced plug-in?
Please, help me.
Thanks a lot
Robert

I have problems with the gmail plug-in as well. I have a bb 9700 bold and very often my gmail emails don't arrive in the email inbox. They do arrive in the message box (the one that has everything including phone calls, sms, etc.) but the icon that is just reserved for my gmail emails do not receive them correctly. Nobody is able to help me to figure out what is causing this; neither blackberry support or my telephone service provider. Also sometimes once I read a mail, it vanishes from the inbox as well. very strange...

Problem with BBM Contacts

I have a problem with my contacts. Every morning I have to keep re-inviting a few contacts on my BBM contact list.
They appear on my list, but when I try to talk to them, a message saying some something along the line of "This person does not have you on his/her contact list. Do you want to re-invite?"
The funny thing is that it only happens to few certain people on my list. I have to keep re-inviting these few people everyday, and it's only those exact same people. When I asked them about it, they said that I disappeared from their contact list.
Is there anyone having the same problem? Is the problem on their side or mine?
I am using BB 9700 on BBM version .57
Please advise. Thanks!
EDIT: All the contacts I have to keep re-inviting are also using BB 9700.

arcleid wrote:
When I asked them about it, they said that I disappeared from their contact list.
You're sure they're telling you the truth?
Try this, have those contacts delete you. You delete them, from your device. Both of you do a battery pull reboot.
Then, add them back, one by one.
1. If any post helps you please click the below the post(s) that helped you.
2. Please resolve your thread by marking the post "Solution?" which solved it for you!
3. Install free BlackBerry Protect today for backups of contacts and data.
4. Guide to Unlocking your BlackBerry & Unlock Codes
Join our BBM Channels (Beta)
BlackBerry Support Forums Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

YM problem with 9700

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for