Z10 on EAS Remote Search not performing.

Hello there!
I have a Z10 that is connecting to our Exchange Server via EAS.
Because of the 30 day limitation on emails we are wanting to use the Remote Search function in order to retrieve older emails from the server. However, it only seems to retrieve result that are ~45 days old.
There don't appear to be any configuration issues with the phone and there are no configuration issues with the server as our iPhone and Android clients can retrieve emails of any age via an EAS connection.
My clients require the ability to search for older emails on the server; up to 3 years worth.
According to Blackberries official statement on searching for emails older than 30 days: http://www.blackberry.com/btsc/KB33742
Workaround
Attempt a remote search to retrieve older emails. "
Well Blackberry, we have, and it doesn't.
Is this problem being worked on?
Cheers
Gord

it is being looked into from what I have heard and it does not work on BES 10 either for me
Click here to Backup the data on your BlackBerry Device! It's important, and FREE!
Click "Accept as Solution" if your problem is solved. To give thanks, click thumbs up
Click to search the Knowledge Base at BTSC and click to Read The Fabulous Manuals
BESAdmin's, please make a signature with your BES environment info.
SIM Free BlackBerry Unlocking FAQ
Follow me on Twitter @knottyrope
Want to thank me? Buy my KnottyRope App here
BES 12 and BES 5.0.4 with Exchange 2010 and SQL 2012 Hyper V

Similar Messages

  • Remote Search on IMAP email

    The option 'Remote Search' does not appear at the bottom of the search results of either of my IMAP emails set up on my Z10.  Remote Search used to work perfectly with my old iPhone 3G and the same email providers.  Is Remote Search supported on IMAP email in which case how do I turn it on?

    It also depends on the email service provider and the device. For example, Google removed Active Sync for all but paid Google Apps subscribers and grandfathered devices (those already setup using EAS.) I have a Z10 that I can access EAS and remote search with GMail and another, that I acquired later after Google dropped EAS, that has to connect via IMAP and I get no remote search.
    1. Please thank those who help you by clicking the "Like" button at the bottom of the post that helped you.
    2. If your issue has been solved, please resolve it by marking the post "Solution?" which solved it for you!

  • Palm says Domino servers not supported (??????) - webOS 2.1.0 IMAP or EAS Sync do not work

    So I've been struggling to get my work email up and running on a new Pre2. All my accounts except my work account sync without any issue. At work we use a Domino 8.5.2 server with Domino Traveler. Users not using the corporate BB's have the option to sync their mail using IMAP or EAS (on Traveler) on the server. Both of these work flawlessly on my Pre (minus) 1.4.5 (which I am still using) and neither works on the Pre2 2.1.0.
    I have been all over the internet, logged a complaint with Palm. Had the problem escalated to Level 3.  HP-Palm has no tech support for WebOs devices in Asia (where I am presently based) and they told me US based level 3 tech support cannot make overseas calls. Tried calling the US tech support myself but it took 30min to get the guy to understand the problem as I had to start from scratch even after giving my complaint ref number. After that no news from them. No call back no email - nothing. Finally wrote an email on their website complaining to HP's CEO. The very next day some guy from tech support in Asia called me and giving reference of my email to Mr.Apotheker told me that he would co-ordinate with the engineers in USa and call me each day to update me on the status of my complaint.
    After 3 calls from the guy during with some more questions answered he finally called me this morning to convey the following to me.
    "The complaint lodged by you has been checked, duplicated at our end and confirmed. However, IMAP email on a Domino server or Domino Traveler EAS synchronization is not supported by webOS 2 so we cannot help me any further. Have a nice day!"
    Wow, I could not believe that this guy was actually serious about this statement. HP-Palm are actually publicly stating that a webOS 2 device syncing with a Domino server is not officially supported. That in my opinion is unbelievable. They cannot possibly have any hopes of being a serious player in the enterprise environment with this level (or lack thereof) of email sync support on the device.
    To anyone who can still help me trouble shoot I have already tried the following:
    - deleted & setup problem account again
    - partial erase
    - full erase
    - full secure erase with a completely new palm profile
    - on server side completely new mail db setup on server
    - trying to click forward and back between email messages
    - setting up a test account for the palm guys to try to log into and confirm duplication of this issue at their end
    Nothing works. The final result is:
    IMAP: it is absolutely impossible to get the IMAP Sync to show folders from our sever. The account gets set up and validates without any problem. But no folders show up on the device. If you click on drafting a new email message and send out a message it may or may not go (random behavior). It shows up in the Outbox on the device and in case it is successfully transmitted it just disappears from device (no sent folder). On the desktop client the sent email appears in the sent folder.
    Conclusion: SMTP relay works at times. IMAP sync for incoming connects but no folders show up on device.
    EAS Sync with Domino Traveler: After trying dozens of different configurations the email starts to sync and all the folders show up. all email headers show up just fine. But whenever I try to open an email it needs anywhere from a couple of seconds to 30-40 seconds while I watch the "retrieving email text" then if I am lucky the email opens with full text but there are a number of email messages which never open and eventually give me an "error - unable to download".
    Conclusion: The email sync with Traveler is completely random. I can read some messages but most show me an error. The contacts search from Global address book on the server works albeit with a 5-10 second delay.
    HP-Palm have given me a reference bug number CSO-7675 and as I understood officially told me that they cannot offer any further help. I don't know if this issue will be addressed in subsequent updates or I'm on my own. If anyone can offer any further help on this issue it would be much appreciated.
    Post relates to: Pre 2 p102ueu (SFR)

    I have tried much of what you have and have the same basic problem. Email sync to Traveler 8.5.2FP2 is erratic at best. Another symptom I see is if sometimes when I open an email from the Inbox, I get the body of a different email! So something is definitely broken. Question is, is it Traveler or WebOS? It seems that WebOS 2.x uses a later version of Active Sync as I can see messages on the Domino console referring to XML tags that are not understood and other error messages. I'm pretty sure Traveler only supports what is needed for the iPhone to sync. It is very annoying and pretty much makes email / celndaring unusable. The calendar on my Pre seems to take a long time to respond after opening and I'm pretty sure it's due to the above issues. I have tried the commonTime mNotes product and that works fine but I would prefer to use Traveler as it is a more elegant solution.

  • Mail+Spotlight Search Not Working in Lion

    I've been dealing with this problem for over a month and have not been able to fix it.  Search works fine in Lion on several computers, but on my laptop it still won't do a complete search.  It will only pull up emails from people in my contacts list..... no subject key word searches or people outside my contacts searches..... very frustrating! The searches also don't work in Spotlight, so I can't use spotlight as a backup.
    I've tried rebuilding my mailbox.... deleting and recreating the account.... tossing out the Envelope Index folders in the Mail library... Deleting and re installing my search window, etc...... I see lot's of other people with the same issue. It's frustrating when your running your business on your computer and have to deal with a flaw in a new OS..... it was working fine in Leopard..... whats up APPLE?  Please help! 
    Other Info:
    Macbook Pro 2008 Version with 2.5 Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo
    Running 10.7.4

    Glenn,
    Regarding adding and deleting the System Drive from the Spotlight Privacy Tab...... I'm following your sequence, but when I come back to Spotlight Search in the menu bar it just works the same.... no mention of indexing. What's interesting is that "Mail" dosn't appear anywhere in search results when a keyword search is performed via spotlight.
    Regarding the "enevelope Index Files" ..... I followed the instructions and quit and re-opened mail as instructed.  When I re-opened Mail I selected "continue" and the program began to index the contents of mail for about 30 minutes.  I thought that would would fix the issue, but it's still not working. 
    I've tried to compare the account setup from my IMAC which works fine to see if I have something setup wrong in the account, but everything looks the same. 
    I guess I can try to re-index again?  Don't know what else to do? 
    Thanks,
    Bill

  • Robohelp8 Help Output Search not working

    Using WebHelp and WebHelp Pro as single source layouts.
    I open  the Help Guide. I enter a term in the upper right corner search box.  This causes the Search "Bar" to open along the left side. The search  term is filled in, but the search does not happen. I have to hit enter  again for the search to be performed.
    This only happens on the  initial opening of the Help Guide. When I toggle to Contents or Index  and search from the upper right corner again, the Search bar opens and  the search is performed with no issue.
    Issue happens in FF, IE,  Safari and Chrome on Mac and Win
    Any idea what may be causing  this?

    SOLVED

  • About Running Remote Search Helps in SRM via Webdynpro ABAP

    Hi there,
    I am having troubles trying to implement an input help for a custom field in the standard Shopping Cart Portal page for item level.
    I would like to implement the same input help used in field Network of Activities, but as I can see in WDA component '/SAPSRM/WDC_UI_DO_ACC', it seems to use another component in order to run a remote Search Help (I assume it is an original search help from PS system).
    Does anybody know how to use this backend search help WDA Component? (/SAPSRM/WDC_UI_BACKEND_SH)
    I haven´t found any information regarding that :S.
    Another option would be to create a new RFC FM in PS returning the expected values, and use these entries to build a list value selector associated to the corresponding context attribute (This is not what I would like...)
    Thanks in advance!

    Vicente Ángel Lopez Romero wrote:
    > Hi there,
    >
    > I am having troubles trying to implement an input help for a custom field in the standard Shopping Cart Portal page for item level.
    >
    > I would like to implement the same input help used in field Network of Activities, but as I can see in WDA component '/SAPSRM/WDC_UI_DO_ACC', it seems to use another component in order to run a remote Search Help (I assume it is an original search help from PS system).
    >
    > Does anybody know how to use this backend search help WDA Component? (/SAPSRM/WDC_UI_BACKEND_SH)
    >
    > I haven´t found any information regarding that :S.
    >
    >
    > Another option would be to create a new RFC FM in PS returning the expected values, and use these entries to build a list value selector associated to the corresponding context attribute (This is not what I would like...)
    >
    > Thanks in advance!
    Figured it out.
    /SAPSRM/WDC_UI_BACKEND_SH is a 'freely programmed' search help used in SRM.
    1. Add this helpview (HV) component usage to your component controller, and view controller.
    2. Map HV SELECTION context to your view
    3. Modify the context attribute you want backend searchhelp to 'freely programmed', and select the component usage created in step above (note this is done dynamically in SAP code, b/c attribute is defined as dictionary search help in SAP components) -- this took a bit to figure out.
    4. IMPORTANT: Give your context attributes the SAME NAME (COST_CTR in my case) as those in structure /SAPSRM/S_CH_WD_MAP_ACC (how obvious was that)
    5. IMPORTANT: Set your LOGSYS in /SAPSRM/CL_PDO_VALHELP_FACTORY class - love those those factories (tic)
    DATA: lo_helper TYPE REF TO /SAPSRM/IF_PDO_ACCT_ASSGT_HLPR,
    CALL METHOD /SAPSRM/CL_PDO_VALHELP_FACTORY=>GET_ACCT_ASSGT_HELPER
    RECEIVING
    RO_ACC_ASSGT_HELPER = lo_helper.
    CALL METHOD lo_helper->set_searchhelp_control
    EXPORTING
    iv_logsys = ls_logsys-logsys.
    6. Now handle event DATA_SELECTED to get data from SELECTION, and move to your Context field.
    How simple was that? Yikes. I should have just built a custom dictionary search help to RFC over and call the BAPI for Cost Center List.
    - Tim

  • Time Machine Error: The backup was not performed because an error occurred

    G'day (from Queensland, Australia)
    Not for the first time Time Machine has broken down - originally in September 08 (I just can't recall how I fixed it!!).
    Now it has failed after 14 months of faultless performance.
    There seems to be little help available, but searching for solutions finds plenty of problems.
    I get the message "The backup was not performed because an error occurred while copying to the backup disk.
    The problem may be temporary. Try again later to back up. If the problem persists, use Disk Utility to repair you backup disk."
    (I have a Time Capsule as my backup disk)
    Disk Utility runs and finds-
    Verifying volume “Backup of xxxxxx’s iMac”
    2010-01-25 12:16:09 +1000: Starting verification tool:
    2010-01-25 12:49:21 +1000: The volume Backup of xxxxxx’s iMac appears to be OK.
    2010-01-25 12:49:21 +1000: Repair tool completed:
    So I search and find "Fix for broken Time Machine backups under Snow Leopard"
    (http://www.andrewgrant.org/2009/09/22/fix-for-broken-time-machine-backups-under- snow-leopard.html) - downgrading to 7.4.1 of the Airport Extreme / Time Capsule firmware.
    But still have the same Time Machine error!
    On to http://forums.macosxhints.com/showthread.php?t=103919&highlight=TimeMachineError
    and try-
    "... suggesting would be something like renaming the existing TimeMachine file on your backup disk - e.g. add a date to the end of it.
    And then go onto Time Machine preferences and set it up as if it were the first time you used it. (Renaming the file on the backup disk should make Time Machine think that you are starting fresh.)"
    So, using Finder, I opened my Time Capsule and renamed "xxxxxx’s iMac_00224135e6fb.sparsebundle" as "091222xxxxxx’s iMac_00224135e6fb.sparsebundle091222"
    And finally, this worked - I have my backups to 22 December and a complete backup as at today and hopefully for at least another 14 months!

    pjh42 wrote:
    G'day (from Queensland, Australia)
    Not for the first time Time Machine has broken down - originally in September 08 (I just can't recall how I fixed it!!).
    Now it has failed after 14 months of faultless performance.
    There seems to be little help available, but searching for solutions finds plenty of problems.
    On the contrary. At the top of this forum are four *User Contributed Tips,* including one on Troubleshooting that would have saved you a great deal of time.

  • Has anyone seen this before,? some import operations were not performed , could not copy the file to requested location

    some import operations were not performed , could not copy the file to requested location , has anyone seen this or have a fix?

    cormacc57361247 wrote:
    has anyone seen this or have a fix?
    Oh, I bet that if you'd done a site search, you'd have got answers to both of those questions...

  • Order types entered in a Ztable, system will not perform material listing.

    Hi Guys,
    I have a requirement where user will enter the list of order types to be excluded from material listing  through a custom table.
    For all those order types entered in the custom table the  system will not perform any material listing check, regardless if the material is existing in the material listing.
    Can you please tell me how to do this through coding???Any particular exit or where can i code this.???
    Many Thanks in Advance,
    Rajendra
    Moderator message : Requirements dumping not allowed, show the work you have already done.  Thread locked.
    Edited by: Vinod Kumar on Jan 13, 2012 4:08 PM

    Swagat,
          Thank you for your response, what I am still not getting is - even in manual transfers via LT10 shouldn't the system restrict the movements to certain storage types? If you think from the shopfloor perspective the WM material movements are done at WM level only - meaning moving materials from one storage type to another and LT10 is widely used as it is one step tcode.
    I know we can restrict movements when storage class is assigned in search strategy, but this applies only to hazardous materials. The material in question is not hazardous so I am still thinking if there is any way to restrict material movements.
    Do you have any documentation link which mentions search strategies are not taken into consideration during manual transfer? If yes please send that would be helpful.
    Once again thanks for your time.

  • Widows Search not working with Data Deduplication?

    Hi,
    I noticed that many files were missing when searching for them on my Server 2012 Fileserver.
    After some troubleshooting I noticed that the ones missing, had a Size on Disk of 4KB and the "SparseFile" and "ReparsePoint" (PL) Flags set.
    So it looks like they were processed by the enabled Data Deduplication.
    Am I missing something here or is it really the case that deduplicated files cannot be indexed by windows search?

    BTW! "... and mounted those file hierarcies below. 5 reparse points" so I my case I had consolidated the users Space into 5 overall concepts on 1 volume each. In that way I had already reduced my use of volumes.
    So for now I can add a drive letter to each for trying to make Windows Search work.
    But guess I am going to stumble into the same issue then with Windows Search not supporting resparse points again ....because some of the volumes are deduped.
    Great experience as ever working with file virtualization in the Windows client, i.e. Liberaries. Just wonder why the heck MS did not improove that experience ...
    Right now, with Server 2012, find myself "hacking" again this year 2013 ... to try and make Windows work on some basic issues. All the Flex is starting to go away now ... here comes reality ... NOT WORKING.
    NTFS resparse points, long file names, etc. Great Flex! However in theory only. For real when everything is pulled together and the system receives its more or less complete configuration ... unsupported in Windows. Go hack it.
    Please stop doing just components test ... and do complete flight tests also. More hollistic tests please across constraints! With a focus in each test ... from 0 to a fully configured system.
    How can no support in Windows Search for resparse points in NTFS be a miss during introduction of libraries (Windows 7/2008 R2) and now during introduction of data deduplication (Windows 8/2012) ... during just internal tests at MS? And we all have to use
    libraries (thus a remote Windows Search index on remote shares in a domain setup) ... and now Windows 8 WinRT is even more dependent on libraries? How can that be overlooked - or such a basic thing receive no priority - and just get skipped? How can that happen?

  • Google searches not showing in history

    This was a problem long ago that seemed to go away, but it's happening again.  Not every time, but often when I perform a Google search from the URL "smart" field, that search doesn't show up in my browsing history.  No idea when or why this happens.
    Any ideas?

    Initiate a search from "Google search", not from Safari smart search field.
    Click "Settings" at the bottom right corner of the page.
    Select "Search settings" from the window that pops up.
    Search Settings  > Google instant predictions
    Select " Never show instant results".
    Now Google search from smartsearch field will be shown in the history.
    Keep a record of this, incase if you want to change it back.

  • Twistedcaldav remote-server-not-found error

    [notifications] 2012-01-01 18:53:11+0100 [XmlStream,client] [twistedcaldav.notify.XMPPNotifier#error] PubSub node creation error: <error code='404' type='cancel'><remote-server-not-found xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-stanzas'/></error>
    Whenever I startup iCal on my OSX Server I see the following error.
    Can anyone explain what this is caused by?
    -Paul-

    ''AG [[#answer-698983|said]]''
    <blockquote>
    disabling the .http2 configs did not work
    is there a work around for the DNS "ANY" issue for me to try? I'll search.
    A
    </blockquote>
    The easiest method is just to wait a few days for the Fx36.0.1 update. If you use
    Firefox Menu Button -> Help -> AboutFirefox
    each day that will check to see if the upgrade is available.
    The bug fix is I think merely changing prefs and so you could do that yourself. It may be safer to use a spare additional profile, or backup the file ''prefs.js'' when trying that initially, because making mistakes in about:config may break Firefox.
    * http://kb.mozillazine.org/Prefs.js_file
    * http://kb.mozillazine.org/About:config
    * [[Use the Profile Manager to create and remove Firefox profiles]]
    Just toggling the pref '''''network.dns.get-ttl''''' to '''''false''''' should fix the issue, that basically is what is done in
    Bug 1093983 - DNS resolver should not use 'ANY' to get cached records for TTL
    One of the bug fixes about to be applied in the imminent Fx36.0.1 point Release

  • Windows Resource Protection could not perform the requested operation.

    A close friend's machine was blue screening on boot so he had me take a look at it.  The error in the BSOD indicated Windows was having trouble reading from the drive.  Although the drive wasn't clicking, based on what I was seeing, it seemed pretty
    clear the drive was on its way out.  I ran chkdsk, several times, and it found plenty of bad sectors but wasn't able to really fix anything.  Fortunately I was able to
    clone the drive using gparted
    run chkdsk
    fix the master boot record, boot sector and boot configuration data store
    run chkdsk again
    Now all is well
    Upon booting I noticed the system was dreadfully out of date: Firefox, Java, Reader, Flash - the works - so I updated all that.  I also noticed it was missing something like 50-70  Windows updates so I had to straight that right away.  It
    managed to install 15-20 before failing with 80070057.  This to me isn't too uncommon so I rebooted thinking it wouldn't choke next time. Much to my chagrin, any subsequent attempts fail with error 80070057.  I even tried installing just a few updates
    at a time, even just 1, and the error persists.  My assumption is that one or more files are maybe damaged and need to be fixed.
    I ran sfc /scannow and it gets to about 27%, then fails with "Windows Resource Protection could not perform the requested operation."  I did the following:
    backed up the existing CBS log
    ran sfc /scannow again
    watched the log in powershell via Get-Content C:\Windows\Logs\CBS\CBS.log -Wait
    It started out strong
    PS C:\Windows\Logs\CBS> Get-Content C:\Windows\Logs\CBS\CBS.log -Wait
    2014-03-06 18:48:33, Info CBS Loaded Servicing Stack v6.0.6002.18005 with Core: C:\Windows\winsxs\amd64_microsoft-windows-servicingstack_31bf3856ad364e35_6.0.6
    002.18005_none_676975d87cc9b6e6\cbscore.dll
    2014-03-06 18:48:33, Info CSI 00000001@2014/3/6:23:48:33.027 WcpInitialize (wcp.dll version 0.0.0.5) called (stack @0x7fef0cf8c85 @0x7feff3f53ae @0x7feff3c3ed1
    @0xffa949a8 @0xffa930c9 @0xffa93578)
    2014-03-06 18:48:33, Info CSI 00000002@2014/3/6:23:48:33.045 WcpInitialize (wcp.dll version 0.0.0.5) called (stack @0x7fef0cf8c85 @0x7feff4386cf @0x7feff4125d9
    @0x7feff3c3feb @0xffa949a8 @0xffa930c9)
    2014-03-06 18:48:33, Info CSI 00000003@2014/3/6:23:48:33.048 WcpInitialize (wcp.dll version 0.0.0.5) called (stack @0x7fef0cf8c85 @0x7feff21838d @0x7feff2184ba
    @0xffa94207 @0xffa93125 @0xffa93578)
    2014-03-06 18:48:33, Info CBS NonStart: Checking to ensure startup processing was not required.
    2014-03-06 18:48:33, Info CSI 00000004 IAdvancedInstallerAwareStore_ResolvePendingTransactions (call 1) (flags = 00000004, progress = NULL, phase = 0, pdwDispo
    sition = @0xb8fad0
    2014-03-06 18:48:33, Info CBS NonStart: Success, startup processing not required as expected.
    2014-03-06 18:48:33, Info CSI 00000005 CSI Store 4751600 (0x00000000004880f0) initialized
    2014-03-06 18:48:38, Info CSI 00000006 [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:48:38, Info CSI 00000007 [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:48:39, Info CSI 00000008 Repair results created:
    POQ 0 starts:
    POQ 0 ends.
    2014-03-06 18:48:39, Info CSI 00000009 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:48:39, Info CSI 0000000a [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:48:39, Info CSI 0000000b [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:48:40, Info CSI 0000000c Repair results created:
    POQ 1 starts:
    POQ 1 ends.
    2014-03-06 18:48:40, Info CSI 0000000d [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:48:40, Info CSI 0000000e [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:48:40, Info CSI 0000000f [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:48:41, Info CSI 00000010 Repair results created:
    POQ 2 starts:
    POQ 2 ends.
    2014-03-06 18:48:41, Info CSI 00000011 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:48:41, Info CSI 00000012 [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:48:41, Info CSI 00000013 [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:48:41, Info CSI 00000014 Repair results created:
    POQ 3 starts:..... and so on
    Until it hit a problem
    POQ 34 ends.
    2014-03-06 18:49:08, Info CSI 00000091 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:49:08, Info CSI 00000092 [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:49:08, Info CSI 00000093 [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:49:09, Info CSI 00000094 Repair results created:
    POQ 35 starts:
    POQ 35 ends.
    2014-03-06 18:49:09, Info CSI 00000095 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:49:09, Info CSI 00000096 [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:49:09, Info CSI 00000097 [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:49:10, Info CSI 00000098 Repair results created:
    POQ 36 starts:
    POQ 36 ends.
    2014-03-06 18:49:10, Info CSI 00000099 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:49:11, Info CSI 0000009a [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:49:11, Info CSI 0000009b [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:49:12, Error CSI 0000009c@2014/3/6:23:49:12.802 (F) d:\longhorn\base\wcp\primitiveinstallers\filehierarchy.cpp(1939): Error STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER originated in fun
    ction FileInstaller::CFileInstallerHierarchy::PortFileInformationBetweenCdfs expression: TmpBlob.Length == sizeof(LUACDF_FILE_ENTRY)
    [gle=0x80004005]
    2014-03-06 18:49:16, Error CSI 0000009d (F) STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER #2119209# from CFileInstaller::CommitChanges(...)[gle=0xd000000d]
    2014-03-06 18:49:16, Error CSI 0000009e (F) STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER #2119208# from PrimitiveInstaller::CCoordinator::FinalizeChanges(...)[gle=0xd000000d]
    2014-03-06 18:58:33, Info CBS Scavenge: Package store indicates there is no component to scavenge, skipping.
    I searched for "[SR]" but I didn't see anything of great interest
    C:\Windows\system32>findstr /c:"[SR]" %windir%\logs\cbs\cbs.log
    2014-03-06 18:48:38, Info CSI 00000006 [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:48:38, Info CSI 00000007 [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:48:39, Info CSI 00000009 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:48:39, Info CSI 0000000a [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:48:39, Info CSI 0000000b [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:48:40, Info CSI 0000000d [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:48:40, Info CSI 0000000e [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:48:40, Info CSI 0000000f [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:48:41, Info CSI 00000011 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:48:41, Info CSI 00000012 [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:48:41, Info CSI 00000013 [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:48:41, Info CSI 00000015 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:48:42, Info CSI 00000016 [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:48:42, Info CSI 00000017 [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:48:42, Info CSI 00000019 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:48:42, Info CSI 0000001a [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:48:42, Info CSI 0000001b [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:48:44, Info CSI 0000001d [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:48:44, Info CSI 0000001e [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:48:44, Info CSI 0000001f [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:48:45, Info CSI 00000021 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:48:45, Info CSI 00000022 [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:48:45, Info CSI 00000023 [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:48:45, Info CSI 00000025 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:48:46, Info CSI 00000026 [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:48:46, Info CSI 00000027 [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:48:46, Info CSI 00000029 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:48:47, Info CSI 0000002a [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:48:47, Info CSI 0000002b [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:48:47, Info CSI 0000002d [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:48:48, Info CSI 0000002e [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:48:48, Info CSI 0000002f [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:48:48, Info CSI 00000031 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:48:48, Info CSI 00000032 [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:48:48, Info CSI 00000033 [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:48:49, Info CSI 00000035 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:48:49, Info CSI 00000036 [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:48:49, Info CSI 00000037 [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:48:50, Info CSI 00000039 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:48:50, Info CSI 0000003a [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:48:50, Info CSI 0000003b [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:48:50, Info CSI 0000003d [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:48:51, Info CSI 0000003e [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:48:51, Info CSI 0000003f [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:48:51, Info CSI 00000041 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:48:51, Info CSI 00000042 [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:48:51, Info CSI 00000043 [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:48:52, Info CSI 00000045 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:48:52, Info CSI 00000046 [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:48:52, Info CSI 00000047 [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:48:52, Info CSI 00000049 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:48:53, Info CSI 0000004a [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:48:53, Info CSI 0000004b [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:48:53, Info CSI 0000004d [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:48:54, Info CSI 0000004e [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:48:54, Info CSI 0000004f [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:48:54, Info CSI 00000051 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:48:54, Info CSI 00000052 [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:48:54, Info CSI 00000053 [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:48:55, Info CSI 00000055 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:48:55, Info CSI 00000056 [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:48:55, Info CSI 00000057 [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:48:55, Info CSI 00000059 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:48:56, Info CSI 0000005a [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:48:56, Info CSI 0000005b [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:48:56, Info CSI 0000005d [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:48:56, Info CSI 0000005e [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:48:56, Info CSI 0000005f [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:48:57, Info CSI 00000061 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:48:57, Info CSI 00000062 [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:48:57, Info CSI 00000063 [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:48:58, Info CSI 00000065 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:48:58, Info CSI 00000066 [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:48:58, Info CSI 00000067 [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:49:00, Info CSI 00000069 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:49:00, Info CSI 0000006a [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:49:00, Info CSI 0000006b [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:49:00, Info CSI 0000006d [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:49:01, Info CSI 0000006e [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:49:01, Info CSI 0000006f [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:49:01, Info CSI 00000071 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:49:02, Info CSI 00000072 [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:49:02, Info CSI 00000073 [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:49:02, Info CSI 00000075 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:49:02, Info CSI 00000076 [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:49:02, Info CSI 00000077 [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:49:03, Info CSI 00000079 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:49:03, Info CSI 0000007a [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:49:03, Info CSI 0000007b [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:49:04, Info CSI 0000007d [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:49:04, Info CSI 0000007e [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:49:04, Info CSI 0000007f [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:49:05, Info CSI 00000081 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:49:05, Info CSI 00000082 [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:49:05, Info CSI 00000083 [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:49:06, Info CSI 00000085 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:49:06, Info CSI 00000086 [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:49:06, Info CSI 00000087 [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:49:06, Info CSI 00000089 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:49:07, Info CSI 0000008a [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:49:07, Info CSI 0000008b [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:49:07, Info CSI 0000008d [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:49:08, Info CSI 0000008e [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:49:08, Info CSI 0000008f [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:49:08, Info CSI 00000091 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:49:08, Info CSI 00000092 [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:49:08, Info CSI 00000093 [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:49:09, Info CSI 00000095 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:49:09, Info CSI 00000096 [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:49:09, Info CSI 00000097 [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    2014-03-06 18:49:10, Info CSI 00000099 [SR] Verify complete
    2014-03-06 18:49:11, Info CSI 0000009a [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components
    2014-03-06 18:49:11, Info CSI 0000009b [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction
    C:\Windows\system32>
    I've run into sfc issues in the past, and in one instance, booting the OS install DVD, and running sfc /scannow /offbootdir=c:\ /offwindir=c:\windows did fix the issue.  But I have to ask
    Is there no way to do that while in Windows?  Can't I mount some WIM and do it that way instead of booting the DVD?
    Is that the right course of action, or is/are there some other options I should explore?
    Thanks for your time & guidance.

    Hi,
    In my opinion, if you want  SFC to use a sourcepath to repair your system, you can just use in-place upgrade to do this:
    How to Perform an In-Place Upgrade on Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows Server 2008 & Windows Server 2008 R2
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2255099
    If you have any feedback on our support, please click
    here
    Alex Zhao
    TechNet Community Support
    Thanks for taking the time to reply and for this suggestion.
    The in-place upgrade is a wonderful potential solution, but the process requires the source media.  Most systems these days don't include the OS or recovery CD's because the manufacturers want you to pay for them.  And most consumers aren't spending
    the $50-$70 dollars to get the media, which complicates things in situations like this.  So while they've purchased a machine and have a valid Microsoft COA sticker on the box, they can't do anything.
    Also, to make matters worse, I posted this in the wrong forum as this is a Vista Home Premium PC.  [My sincere apologies for that. Mods please feel free to move/reclassify]  I do have a Vista Home Premium DVD, but its the 32-bit version, not 64-bit,
    which is what this system is.  So unless I can locate a Visa Home Premium 64-bit DVD, or they upgrade to Windows 7 or 8 (which they probably should do anyway), we're sunk.

  • Remote Desktop - not running/no listener on port 3389

    Hello,
    I have a problem with RDS (Remote Desktop) on a Windows 7 machine. It worked fine for the past 2 years.
    Error: The computer can’t connect to the remote computer.
    First I checked some settings:
    RDP enabled (also tried to disable, reboot en then enable)
    Registry: fEnableWinStation (1)
    Firewall is disabled
    RDP / RDS services are running
    Problem:
    RDP/RDS is not listening
    “qwinsta” command: rdp-tcp is not listed
    “netstat –an” command: no listener on port 3389
    (rdp is configured to use the default port, 3389)
    I also checked the “RDP Winstation driver” and the “Remote Desktop Services Security Filter Driver”.
    Statup type: Demand
    Problem: Both are NOT started.
    When I start them manually, or set the startup type to “boot” and then reboot
    the drivers will start, but it makes no difference. Still not listening on 3389.
    Does someone know a solution besides reinstall the OS.
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    Firstly, I would like to check when did this issue happen? Whether you have tried installed some software or updates?
    Meanwhile, please try to perform a
    system restore to check the result.
    Also check the server settings, here is a similar thread:
    Terminal Services/ Remote Desktop not working 
    Hope this helps.
    Vincent Wang
    TechNet Community Support
    Have you tried this?
    Regards
    Vincent Wang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Role Upload - Could not perform action

    Gurus,
    I am attempting to upload a sampling of R/3 ECC 6.0 roles into the portal (EP6). I have the system connection defined and testing successfully. I unfortunately can not execute the upload function. After defining the selections that I wish to upload, in this case a role, I receive the red exclamation mark followed by "Could not perform action. Check the role migration log for additional information"
    I also have not been able to locate this migration log. I have searched here and sap's help portal for the location of this log but to no avail. Any assistance will be greatly appreciated.

    Hi Mike,
    usually you are able do drill down this information further more.
    If you do not know which file to check look in the defaultTrace.<no>.log for more information. There will be a hint to dive in much deeper.
    On the page where you get this message there is a tab "Log Viewer" please have a look at this to get more information.
    Best regards,
    Michael

Maybe you are looking for