Zfs volumes broken post os patching - spec_getpage called for character...

Hello all,
I have a T2000 (sol10 8/07), OBP 4.27.7, SUNWldm 1.0.1, zfs version 4 that post os patching (using the Sept 08 Recommended patch cluster) now cannot use zfs volumes as virtual disks. Files on zfs filesystems used for boot devices however work fine (ie the ZFS for boot disk setup as described in the admin guide). Whenever I try and "bind-domain" on a guest domain using a zfs volume I see the following in /var/adm/messages on the primary domain...
Sep 3 15:16:56 isdsyddev13 specfs: [ID 853503 kern.notice] NOTICE: spec_getpage called for character device. Check any non-ON consolidation drivers
Sep 3 15:16:59 isdsyddev13 last message repeated 25903 times
syslog tail spins and chews up close to 100% of the cpu. The only way to recover the primary domain is to reboot it (and in some cases power cycle). On the system console I also see the following..
message overflow on /dev/log minor #6 -- is syslogd(1M) running?
NOTICE: spc_getpage called for character device. Check any non-ON onsolidation drivers
A guest ldom config that contains use a zfs volume which kills things when you run bind-domain below..
root@isdsyddev13# ldm ls -l itgsyddev11
NAME STATE FLAGS CONS VCPU MEMORY UTIL UPTIME
itgsyddev11 inactive ----- 4 4G
VARIABLES
auto-boot?=false
boot-device=vdisk
NETWORK
NAME SERVICE DEVICE MAC
vnet0 primary-vsw0 network@0 00:14:4f:f8:85:1c
DISK
NAME VOLUME TOUT DEVICE SERVER
vdisk0 vol9@primary-vds0 disk@0
vdisk1 vol2@primary-vds0 disk@1
There is only one service domain (primary) and it runs the only virtual disk service. Entries for the above vdisks on the primary-vds0 are...
vol2 /dev/zvol/rdsk/isdsyddev13zp_loc/itgsyddev11-optbmc2
vol9 /isdsyddev13zp_loc/itgsyddev11/bootdisk-fullos
subset of zfs output below. The os boot files are clones of a snapshot.
root@isdsyddev13# zfs list
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
isdsyddev13zp_loc 142G 53.5G 79.5K /isdsyddev13zp_loc
isdsyddev13zp_loc/boot-images 20.0G 53.5G 20.0G /isdsyddev13zp_loc/boot-images
isdsyddev13zp_loc/boot-images@initial 22.5K - 20.0G -
isdsyddev13zp_loc/itgsyddev11 645M 53.5G 20.0G /isdsyddev13zp_loc/itgsyddev11
isdsyddev13zp_loc/itgsyddev11-optbmc2 25.4G 58.0G 21.2G -
isdsyddev13zp_loc/itgsyddev11-optbmc2@20080424 4.21G - 18.6G -
Note that if I remove vdisk1 from the guest domain, bind-domain works fine, no issues. So this is an issue just with the zfs volumes used as virtual disks. I also created a new zfs volume, added it to the primary-vds0 and the guest domain. However on bind-domain, same error/issue.
Patches applied from the patch run below...
119812-06
120272-21
127959-02
137017-03
125166-11
119783-06
125184-07
119254-57
120222-28
120222-29
128306-05
122911-13
120292-02
123590-09
119313-21
119059-44
124630-17
120410-29
120094-21
118712-22
127737-02
136892-01
125539-04
137019-02
119042-11
127922-04
138159-01
121004-04
119090-26
127853-02
120830-06
137032-01
137093-01
123611-04
137871-01
136998-04
127755-01
125891-01
127127-11
138068-01
137289-02
137111-03
138291-01
126133-04
138075-02
125551-02
128342-01
128000-01
128294-02
127884-01
128328-01
126206-04
124393-06
119757-12
137321-01
121095-02
119810-05
120543-11
125378-05
128300-03
120201-05
125719-12
137080-01
136882-01
125731-02
121308-12
Any help appreciated.

I am not using ldom version 1.0.3, I'm using version 1.0.1 as per the original post
root@isdsyddev13# pkginfo -l SUNWldm
PKGINST: SUNWldm
NAME: Logical Domains Manager
CATEGORY: application
ARCH: sparc.sun4v
VERSION: 1.0.1,REV=2007.08.23.10.20
BASEDIR: /
VENDOR: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
PSTAMP: dt90-19120070823102022
INSTDATE: Dec 10 2007 14:07
STATUS: completely installed
FILES: 38 installed pathnames
6 shared pathnames
12 directories
23 executables
20860 blocks used (approx)

Similar Messages

Using a ZFS volume with encryption on as the Virtual disk in a Sparc VM

Hi guys,
Working my way through understanding how virtualization works in VM for Sparc. One question I thought of deals with having encryption turned on in a ZFS volume. If I create a volume with encryption ON, and then attach that volume as the sole virtual disk in a guest domain, will the virtualization still work? Has anyone else dealt with a scenario like this? I'm about to try it now, I'll report back with my findings.

From my understanding, if you create a ZFS disk with encryption ON, mount it on Solaris, and after that present that to the VM, you should not have problems. The encryption will work between the volume and Solaris. To the guest vm, it should be transparent.

Add zfs volume to Solaris 8 branded zone

Hi,
I need to add a zfs volume to a Solaris 8 branded zone.
Basically ive created the zvol and added the following to the zone configuration.
# zonecfg -z test
zonecfg:test> add device
zonecfg:test:device> set match=/dev/zvol/dsk/sol8/vol
zonecfg:test:device> end
When I boot the zone it comes up ok but I am unable to see the device, nothing in format, /dev/dsk etc etc
Ive also tried to setmatch to the raw device as well to no avail.
Basically I have numerous zvols to add and dont really want a load of mount points from the global zone then lofs back to the local zone
Any ideas please??
Thanks...

Thanks but that's why I created zfs volumes and newfs'ed them to create UFS and presented those to the zone.
In the end I just create a script in /etc/rc2.d and mounted the filesystems in there.

HTTP-Post/Get method of calling the query service allows us to build URL

Hi,
I am new to webservices.i have requirement that, using a HTTP-Post/Get method of calling the query service that allows us to build an URL and if we call that url it wil populate XML object.i need query LDAP server for getting users manager details ,in request query we wil pass user details.thanks in advance..

check same issue in java forum and this link:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/httpclient/methods/post.html

Backup Fail with Volume Shadow Copy Service error: Error calling a routine on the Shadow Copy Provider, Event ID 12293, error returned while creating the volume shadow copy 0x8004230f,

We are using TINA backup solution and windows 2003 backup is failling with VSS error.
For testing purpose we initiate a system state backup (or any file backup) with the help of windows 2003 ntbackup.exe and found it is failing with below error.
Backup error report.
Backup Status
Operation: Backup
Active backup destination: File
Media name: "Backup.bkf created 28/05/2014 at 06:34"
Volume shadow copy creation: Attempt 1.
Error returned while creating the volume shadow copy:0x8004230f.
Error returned while creating the volume shadow copy:8004230f
Aborting Backup.
The operation did not successfully complete.
We check event viewer and found below error event.
Event Type:
Error
Event Source:
VSS
Event Category:
None
Event ID:
12293
Date:
28/05/2014
Time:
05:48:10
User:
N/A
Computer:
CQ329TOS
Description:
Volume Shadow Copy Service error: Error calling a routine on the Shadow Copy Provider {b5946137-7b9f-4925-af80-51abd60b20d5}. Routine details Cannot ask provider {b5946137-7b9f-4925-af80-51abd60b20d5} if
volume is supported. [0x8000ffff] [hr = 0x8000ffff].

Resolution:
After getting this error we check Shadow Copy provider and writer health and fond it is fine.
To get shadow copy providers details use below command.
Command: vssadmin list providers
Command output
C:\>vssadmin list providers
vssadmin 1.1 - Volume Shadow Copy Service administrative command-line tool
(C) Copyright 2001 Microsoft Corp.
Provider name: 'Microsoft Software Shadow Copy provider 1.0'
   Provider type: System
   Provider Id: {b5946137-7b9f-4925-af80-51abd60b20d5}
   Version: 1.0.0.7
To get shadow copy writers health
Command: vssadmin list writers
Command Output.
C:\>vssadmin list writers
vssadmin 1.1 - Volume Shadow Copy Service administrative command-line tool
(C) Copyright 2001 Microsoft Corp.
Writer name: 'System Writer'
   Writer Id: {e8132975-6f93-4464-a53e-1050253ae220}
   Writer Instance Id: {333e02cd-d9ec-43c8-9b45-39691ad1b351}
   State: [1] Stable
   Last error: No error
Writer name: 'Registry Writer'
   Writer Id: {afbab4a2-367d-4d15-a586-71dbb18f8485}
   Writer Instance Id: {800877a5-e13d-47a3-8f99-ebd4d3b3fd12}
   State: [1] Stable
   Last error: No error
Writer name: 'MSDEWriter'
   Writer Id: {f8544ac1-0611-4fa5-b04b-f7ee00b03277}
   Writer Instance Id: {63400aa0-a17f-4121-9483-1cd226f03238}
   State: [1] Stable
   Last error: No error
Writer name: 'COM+ REGDB Writer'
   Writer Id: {542da469-d3e1-473c-9f4f-7847f01fc64f}
   Writer Instance Id: {e13cb72b-84fa-4c86-86d8-48f523aafc9a}
   State: [1] Stable
   Last error: No error
Writer name: 'Event Log Writer'
   Writer Id: {eee8c692-67ed-4250-8d86-390603070d00}
   Writer Instance Id: {ce63b3a0-e038-4e56-9d07-929f256639de}
   State: [1] Stable
   Last error: No error
Writer name: 'WMI Writer'
   Writer Id: {a6ad56c2-b509-4e6c-bb19-49d8f43532f0}
   Writer Instance Id: {008e8714-ed6d-4288-81ce-4b0b1ec41294}
   State: [1] Stable
   Last error: No error
Writer name: 'BITS Writer'
   Writer Id: {4969d978-be47-48b0-b100-f328f07ac1e0}
   Writer Instance Id: {e22a8953-a52c-4a76-bec0-8773122cbff8}
   State: [1] Stable
   Last error: No error
Next I check Shadow Copies details from volume properties (right click on C or other drive then select properties then click on Shadow Copies Tab) and found it is showing the same error code..
From this error it is clear that the issue is inside the registry hive and due to junk hive shadow copies services not able to working properly.
For me the server have two disk we check disk signature at MBR and found the disk signature was.
Signature disk 0 : 9351912b
Signature disk 0 : FDFBE035
But at registry we found lot of nonexistance signature. Which indicate lot of junk valu inside registry.
Now how can we resolve this issue?
It is very simple just delete the registry key “volume” (registry key “HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Enum\STORAGE\Volume”) and reboot the server it will “Volume” registry hive automatically.
Note:
When you remove registry key it is showing error unable to delete, then please right click on it select permission then take ownership and assign full permission to your login account.
Please be careful when you delete registry key because system can fully crashed if you delete or modify wrong registry key.
Your can take a backup of the registry key by exporting.

How to snapshot zfs volume

Hi All,
did anyone have expereience with ZFS volume snapshot and clone? what I am doing here is: create a zfs volume and present it as root disk to LDOM guest domain. I like to have the flexibility to snapshot and clone the volume before any maintenance. We have tested using image files already. We are comparing performance and maintenance complexity of using both image file and zfs volume.
Any suggestion is welcome.
Thanks,

Thanks! could you please provide more details? zfs snapshot of file system is straightforward. But to snapshot volumes (which underline are 0 & 1s), it does not seem to be that easy. FYI, the zfs volume is only partitioned inside guest domain. From ldom controller domain, prtvtoc shows only one slice. That means inside LDOM controller domain, this volume just looks like raw device.

Oracle ASM on top of ZFS volumes

What kind of overhead is involved if we configure Oracle ASM on top of ZFS volumes? Has anyone performed benchmarks using this scheme?

I've not done it personally with DNFS but I have created a multitude of clusters with NetApp on their NFS file system without ever having an issue other than saving a lot of money.

Can any body tell me how to get a call for adobe interview for a flex developer post for 2.6 years??

can any body tell me how to get a call for adobe interview for a flex developer post for 2.6 years??

hi,
there's some microsoft support to this issue. check here http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2008385
regards.
From out of Nowhere

LDOM 1.1 migration with boot disk on zfs volume

I have a big disk and set up a few zfs volumes for guest domains.
Have anybody successfully configure LDOM 1.1 to migrate guest domains
between two hosts when guest domais are on zfs volumes.
The two hosts shares the FC LUN through SAN.
Any suggestions?
cm

Can you provide a working example of this? I fail to see any benefit of using files as bootdisks via NFS. It seems you will need a new bootdisk file (approx. 12g for our env.) for every ldom guest. First, how do you save storage space? Then, how do you manage additional storage devices for applications which require a small amount of additional disk space (say 50g)? If you use file allocation (mkfile on NFS allocated to an ldom) then you've gotten yourself into potentially disastrous performance issues (virtual guest storage -> virtual I/O management -> file -> NFS -> ZFS -> SAN Luns). The only solution to the problem as I see it is to use a clustered file system, which is not currently a viable option for the following reasons:
1. Veritas CVM does not support Branded Zones in an ldom = we can't use it
2. ZFS is not a cluster file system
So, this begs the question, what is the "Best Practice" for setting up ldom environments (with migration ability) from a storage perspective? What is the Sun recommendation on this?

System volume (and therefore ringing volume) reduces when recieving an incomming call

I set all volumes to full in Lync ,as well as the system master volume. Soon as a phone call comes in I can see the volume slider move to from 100% to around 50%. This is
very werid and is happening on multiple PC's. It started when I upgraded from the Communicator client to the Lync client.
Any ideas on this weirdness??
Thanks,
Andrew

Hi Andrew,
If you wanna get 100% volume, do as follows.
1.
Open "Volume Mixer – Speakers" and move the slider bar to 100.
2.
Make a call. And in the conversation window, click "Adjust volume or mute speakers" icon, and move the slider to 100.
Next time,
when you make a call, the volume will be 100%. Please have a try.
In addition, provide this
article for reference. Hope useful.

Difference between Zfs volume and filesystem ?

Hi,
Does any one know the difference between Zfs volume and Zfs filesystem?
On one of the existing nodes i saw the following enries for two times....
root@node11> zfs get all rpool/dump
NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE
rpool/dump type volume -
rpool/dump creation Thu Feb 18 13:55 2010 -
rpool/dump used 1.00G -
rpool/dump available 261G -
rpool/dump referenced 1.00G -
rpool/dump compressratio 1.00x -
rpool/dump reservation none default
rpool/dump volsize 1G -
rpool/dump volblocksize 128K -
root@node11> zfs get all rpool/ROOT/firstbe/opt/SMAW
NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE
rpool/ROOT/firstbe/opt/SMAW type filesystem -
rpool/ROOT/firstbe/opt/SMAW creation Thu Feb 18 14:03 2010 -
rpool/ROOT/firstbe/opt/SMAW used 609M -
rpool/ROOT/firstbe/opt/SMAW available 264G -
rpool/ROOT/firstbe/opt/SMAW referenced 609M -
rpool/ROOT/firstbe/opt/SMAW compressratio 1.00x -
rpool/ROOT/firstbe/opt/SMAW mounted yes -
rpool/ROOT/firstbe/opt/SMAW quota none default
rpool/ROOT/firstbe/opt/SMAW reservation 4G local
rpool/ROOT/firstbe/opt/SMAW recordsize 128K default
rpool/ROOT/firstbe/opt/SMAW mountpoint /opt/SMAW inherited from rpool/ROOT/firstbe
root@node11> zfs list
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
rpool/dump 1.00G 261G 1.00G -
rpool/ROOT/firstbe/opt/SMAW 609M 264G 609M /opt/SMAW
Regards,
Nitin K

nitin.k wrote:
Hi,
Does any one know the difference between Zfs volume and Zfs filesystem?A volume is a block device. A filesystem is a mounted point for file access.
For most users, a volume isn't normally necessary except for 'dump'.
Darren

[Patch 정보] TRACKING BUG FOR CUMULATIVE MLR#6 ON TOP OF BPEL PM 10.1.3.3.1

최근에 출시된 BPEL PM 10.1.3.3.1의 통합패치입니다.
아래는 readme.txt에 포함된 patch list입니다.
# WARNING: Failure to carefully read and understand these requirements may
# result in your applying a patch that can cause your Oracle Server to
# malfunction, including interruption of service and/or loss of data.
# If you do not meet all of the following requirements, please log an
# iTAR, so that an Oracle Support Analyst may review your situation. The
# Oracle analyst will help you determine if this patch is suitable for you
# to apply to your system. We recommend that you avoid applying any
# temporary patch unless directed by an Oracle Support Analyst who has
# reviewed your system and determined that it is applicable.
# Requirements:
# - You must have located this patch via a Bug Database entry
# and have the exact symptoms described in the bug entry.
# - Your system configuration (Oracle Server version and patch
# level, OS Version) must exactly match those in the bug
# database entry - You must have NO OTHER PATCHES installed on
# your Oracle Server since the latest patch set (or base release
# x.y.z if you have no patch sets installed).
# - [Oracle 9.0.4.1 & above] You must have Perl 5.00503 (or later)
# installed under the ORACLE_HOME, or elsewhere within the host
# environment.
# Refer to the following link for details on Perl and OPatch:
# http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=189489.1
# If you do NOT meet these requirements, or are not certain that you meet
# these requirements, please log an iTAR requesting assistance with this
# patch and Support will make a determination about whether you should
# apply this patch.
# 10.1.3.3.1 Bundle Patch 6823628
# DATE: March 14, 2008
# Platform Patch for : Generic
# Product Version # : 10.1.3.3.1
# Product Patched : Oracle(R) SOA
# Bugs Fixed by 10.1.3.3.1 Initial patch 6492514 :
# Bug 5473225 - PATCH01GENESIS HOT UNABLE TO CATCH AN EXCEPTION DURING A
# TRANSFORM
# Bug 5699423 - PARTNERLINK PROPERTY THAT SET BPELXPROPERTY FUNCTION DOESN'T
# WORK
# Bug 5848272 - STATEFUL WEBSERVICES DEMO ON OTN DOES NOT WORK 10.1.3.1
# Bug 5872799 - ANT DEPLOY BPEL TEST FAILS/RUNS ON DEFAULT DOMAIN NOT
# SPECIFIED TARGET DOMAIN
# Bug 5883401 - ALLOW A WAY TO CREATE EMPTY NODES - AND USE FOR REQUIRED
# NODES
# Bug 5919412 - SAMPLE DEMO BPEL PROCESSES MIMESERVICE MIMEREQUESTER AXIS
# JAVA EXAMPLE ERROR
# Bug 5924483 - ESB SHOULD SUPPORT SOAP EDNPOINT LOCATION DYNAMIC UDDI LOOKUP
# Bug 5926809 - ORAPARSEESCAPEDXML XPATH EXPRESSION FAILED TO EXECUTE
# FOTY0001 TYPE ERROR
# Bug 5937320 - STRANGE BEHAVIOUR CALLING FROM BPEL TO BPEL GETTING
# NULLPOINTEREXCEPTION.
# Bug 5944641 - BPA BLUEPRINT NOT AVAIALBLE IN JDEVELOPER
# Bug 5945059 - JAVA.LANG.NULLPOINTEREXCEPTION SENDING EMAILS WITH PAYLOADS
# LARGER THAT 1MB
# Bug 5962677 - WS RESPONSE IS EMPTY SOAP BODY IN ONE-WAY CALL
# Bug 5963425 - WHEN THE OUTCOMES FOR A HT CHANGED & IMPORTED - UPDATE
# CONNECTION ROLES IN BPEL
# Bug 5964097 - AQ ADAPTER DEPLOYMENT CAUSES OPMN TO PERFORM A FORCEFUL
# SHUTDOWN IN SOA
# Bug 5971534 - CANNOT GRANT USER TASK VIEWS TO GROUPS, ONLY TO USERS.
# Bug 5989367 - REFER TO SR 6252219.993 BPEL 10.1.3 ONLY COPIES IN ASSIGN,
# IN 10.1.2 IT CREATES
# Bug 5989527 - ENHANCEMENT WARNING SHOULD BE GIVEN UPON UPLOAD IF BPEL
# PROCESS IS OPEN IN ARIS
# Bug 5997936 - ESB FAULT DOES NOT GET PROPAGATED TO BPEL
# Bug 6000575 - PERF NEED ESB PURGE SCRIPT TO PURGE BY DATE AND PROCESS
# Bug 6001796 - POSTING OF DATE RECEIVED FROM XML GATEWAY TO BPEL FAILED IN
# ESB
# Bug 6005407 - BPEL PROCESS DOESN'T PROPOGATE FAULT THROWN BY BPEL
# SUB-PROCESS
# Bug 6017846 - MIMETYPE OF EMAIL NOTIFICATION IS NOT SET THROUGH HUMAN TASK
# Bug 6027734 - DECISION SERVICE IMPORT - LOCATING DECISION SERVICE IN .DECS
# FILE IMPROPER
# Bug 6028985 - EXCEEDED MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SUBSCRIBERS FOR QUEUE
# ORAESB.ESB_CONTROL
# Bug 6041508 - CREATING/UPDATING DVM CAUSE EXCEPTION
# Bug 6053708 - FTP ADAPTER DOES NOT SUPPORT ENCRYPTED PASSWORD IN
# OC4J-RA.XML
# Bug 6054034 - INDEX4,INDEX5 AND INDEX6 CANNOT BE USED IN BPEL CONSOLE
# Bug 6068801 - BACKPORT OF BPEL ON WEBLOGIC - VERSION 10.1.3.3
# Bug 6070991 - HT EXPORT DOES NOT EXPORT PARAMETERS, ALLOW PARTICIPANTS TO
# INVITE OTHERS
# Bug 6071001 - WSIF HTTP BINDING NOT WORKING FROM ESB
# Bug 6073311 - STRESS SCOPE NOT FOUND ON CALLBACK - WRONG (DUPE)
# SUBSCRIPTION IN TABLE
# Bug 6081070 - JMS ADAPTER REJECTION HANDLER CREATE 0 BYTE FILES
# Bug 6083419 - DECISION SERVICE SCOPE NEED TO HAVE A SPECIAL INDICATOR
# Bug 6085799 - HUMAN TASK ADDED IN SCOPE IN JDEV IS NOT UPDATED TO BPA
# SERVER
# Bug 6085933 - EXPORT AND EXPLORE SHOULD USE USER LANGUAGE AND NOT ENGLISH
# ALWAYS
# Bug 6086281 - STRING INDEX OUT OF RANGE ERROR FOR COBOL COPYBOOK WITH PIC
# CLAUSE HAVING S
# Bug 6086453 - DOMAINS CREATED IN A CLUSTER GETS NOT PROPAGATED TO NEW OR
# EXISTING NODES
# Bug 6087484 - MULTIPLE HEADER SETTING CAUSES ESB EXCEPTION
# Bug 6087645 - ESB SHOULD ALLOW USER PICK RUNTIME PROTOCOL (HTTP/HTTPS)
# Bug 6110231 - TRANSLATION NOT BASED ON MQ CCSID CHARSET
# Bug 6120226 - BPEL IS NOT SETTING THE APPS CONTEXT CORRECTLY
# Bug 6120323 - COMPLETIONPERSISTPOLICY ON DOMAIN LEVEL HAS DISAPPEARED
# Bug 6125184 - ESB JMS SESSION ROLLBACK ORACLE.JMS.AQJMSEXCEPTION
# Bug 6127824 - [AIA2.0] CURRENT XREF IMPLEMENTATION IS MISSING REQUIRED
# INDEXES ON XREF SCHEMA
# Bug 6128247 - HTTPCONNECTOR POST() METHOD SHOULD RAISE EXCEPTION FOR ALL
# STATUS CODES EXCEPT 2
# Bug 6131159 - ENABLE USERS TO CHOOSE XSD WHEN CREATING A BPEL PROCESS FROM
# BLUE PRINT
# Bug 6132141 - PROCESS_DEFAULT TABLE STILL CONTAINS INFORMATION FROM
# UNDEPLOYED PROCESSES
# Bug 6133190 - ENABLING ESB CONSOLE HTTP/S IS MAKING THE CONSOLE TO COME UP
# BLANK.
# Bug 6139681 - BPEL WSDL LINK IN CLUSTERED RUNTIME POINTS TO A SINGLE NODE
# Bug 6141259 - BASICHEADERS NOT PUTTING WWW-AUTHENTICATE HEADERS FOR HTTP
# BINDING IN BPEL
# Bug 6148021 - BPEL NATIVE SCHEMA FOR COBOL COPYBOOK WITH IMPLIED DECIMAL
# LOSES DIGIT IN OUTPUT
# Bug 6149672 - XOR DATA - CONDITION EXPRESSION SPECIFICATION IS NOT
# INTUITIVE IN BPMN MODELS
# Bug 6152830 - LOSING CONDITIONAL EXPRESSIONS CREATED IN JDEV UPON MERGE
# Bug 6158128 - BASICHEADERS NOT PUTTING WWW-AUTHENTICATE HEADERS FOR HTTP
# BINDING
# Bug 6166991 - WHEN STARTING SOA SUITE,, PROCESSES FAIL DUE TO UNDEFINED
# WSDL
# Bug 6168226 - LOCATION-RESOLVER EXCEPTION THROWN IN OPMN LOGS
# Bug 6187883 - CHANGES FOR BPEL RELEASE ON JBOSS- VERSION 10.1.3.3
# Bug 6206148 - [AIA2.0] NEW FUNCTION REQUEST, XREFLOOKUPPOPULATEDCOLUMNS()
# Bug 6210481 - BPEL PROCESS WORKS INCORRECTLY WHEN AN ACTIVITY HAS MULTIPLE
# TRANSITIONCONDITION
# Bug 6240028 - WEBSERVICE THAT DOES NOT CHALLENGE FOR BASIC CREDENTIALS
# CANNOT BE INVOKED
# Bug 6257116 - MULTIPLE HEADER SETTING CAUSES ESB EXCEPTION
# Bug 6258925 - MESSAGE RECEIVED BY THE TARGET ENDPOINT VIA HTTP POST IS
# MISSING THE XML HEADER
# Bug 6259686 - TOO MANY UNNECESSARY WORKFLOW E-MAIL NOTIFICATIONS GENERATED
# Bug 6267726 - 10.1.3.3 ORACLE APPLICATIONS ADAPTER - NOT ABLE TO CAPTURE
# BUSINESS EVENT
# Bug 6272427 - WEBSPHERE BPEL FAILS FOR DATA RETRIEVAL OF SIZE 500+ KB
# Bug 6276995 - MERGE SCOPE NAME IS NOT UPDATED WHEN CHANGED IN THE SERVER
# Bug 6280570 - XPATH EXPRESSION ERROR IN MEDIATOR FOR ASSIGNING USER-DEFINED
# CONTEXT VALUES
# Bug 6282339 - RETRYCOUNT DOES NOT WORK PROPERLY
# Bug 6311039 - ONE RECORD IS INSERTED TO SYNC_STORE IF
# COMPLETIONPERSISTPOLICY SET TO FAULTED
# Bug 6311809 - [AIA2.0] NON-RETRYABLE ERRORS ARE NOT POSTED ON ESB_ERROR
# TOPIC
# Bug 6314784 - THE PRIORITY DEFINED IN THE BPA SUITE IS NOT TRANSFERRED TO
# THE JDEV CORRECTLY
# Bug 6314982 - THREADPOOL RACE CONDITION IN ADAPTER INITIALIZATION MESSAGES
# NOT PROCESSED
# Bug 6315104 - (SET)CLASSNAME MISSING IN TSENSOR JAXB OBJECTS
# Bug 6316554 - CONSUME FUNCTIONALITY OF JMS ADAPTER FOR BEA WEBLOGIC DOES
# NOT WORK
# Bug 6316950 - FILEADAPTER HARPER ENHANCEMENTS SYNC WRITE AND CHUNKED
# INTERACTION SPEC
# Bug 6317398 - THE ICON FOR COMPUTING DIFFERENCE IS MISSING IN JDEV REFRESH
# FROM SERVER DIALOG
# Bug 6320506 - IMPORT FAILS WHEN THERE IS AN UNNAMED CASE
# Bug 6321011 - CANNOT PROCESS 0 BYTE FILE USING FTP ADAPTER
# Bug 6325749 - TRACKING BUG FOR TRACKING ADDITIONAL CHANGES TO BUG #6032044
# Bug 6328584 - NEED A NEW XPATH EXPRESSION TO GET ATTACHMENT CONTENT VIA
# SOAP INVOKATION
# Bug 6333788 - COLLAPSING OF CONSECUTIVE ASSIGN TASKS BREAKS BAM SENSOR
# Bug 6335773 - BUILD.XML CONTAINS DO NOT EDIT .. - WHILE <CUSTOMIZE> TASK
# MUST BE IN <BPELC>
# Bug 6335805 - AQ ADAPTER OUTBOUND DOESN'T RECONNECT AFTER FAILURE
# Bug 6335822 - [AIA2.0] PSRPERFESB - RUNTIME DVM PERFORMANCE OVERHEAD IN ABS
# USE CASE
# Bug 6339126 - CHECKPOINT BPEL JAVA METHOD DOESN'T WORK IN BPEL 10.1.3.3
# Bug 6342899 - OUTLINECHANGE.XML NOT UPDATE WITH ACTIVITY FROM NEW BRANCH
# Bug 6343299 - ESB CONCRETE WSDL NAMESPACE SHOULD BE DIFFERENT FROM IMPORTED
# WSDL NAMESPACE
# Bug 6372741 - DEHYDRATION DATABASE KEEPS GROWING IN 10.1.3.3
# Bug 6401295 - NXSD SHOULD SUPPORT ESCAPING THE TERMINATED/QUOTED/SURROUNDED
# DELIMITERS
# Bug 6458691 - DIST DIRECTORY FOR 10.1.3.3.1 NEEDS UPDATE
# Bug 6461516 - BPEL CONSOLE CHANGES FOR DISPLAYING RELEASE 10.1.3.3.1
# Bug 6470742 - CHANGE THE VERSION NUMBER AND BUILD INFO IN ABOUT DIALOG IN
# ESB
# BUG ADDED IN MLR#1, 6671813 :
# Bug 6494921 - ORABPEL-02154 IF LONG DOMAIN AND SUITECASE NAMES IN USE
# BUGS ADDED IN MLR#2, 6671831 :
# Bug 6456519 - ERROR IN BPEL CONSOLE THREADS TAB:SERVLETEXCEPTION CANNOT GET
# DISPATCHER TRACE
# Bug 6354719 - WHICH JGROUP CONFIGURATION PARAMETER IMPACTS BPEL CLUSTER
# ACTIVITY
# Bug 6216169 - SCOPE NOT FOUND ERROR WHILE DELIVERING EXPIRATION MESSAGE OF
# ONALARM
# Bug 6395060 - ORA-01704 ON INSERTING A FAULTED INVOKE ACTIVITY_SENSOR
# Bug 6501312 - DEHYDRATION DATABASE KEEPS GROWING IN 10.1.3.3 #2
# Bug 6601020 - SEARCHBASE WHICH INCLUDES PARENTHESIS IN THE NAMES DOES NOT
# WORK
# Bug 6182023 - WAIT ACTIVITY FAILS TO CONTINUE IN CLUSTER WHEN PROCESSING
# NODE GOES DOWN
# BUGS ADDED IN MLR#3, 6723162 :
# Bug 6725374 - INSTANCE NOT FOUND IN DATASOURCE
# Bug 4964824 - TIMED OUT IF SET CORRELATIONSET INITIATE YES IN REPLY
# ACTIVITY
# Bug 6443218 - [AIA2.0]BPEL PROCESS THAT REPLIES A CAUGHT FAULT AND THEN
# RETHROWS IT IS STUCK
# Bug 6235180 - BPPEL XPATH FUNCTION XP20 CURRENT-DATETIME() IS RETURNING AN
# INCORRET TIME
# Bug 6011665 - BPEL RESTART CAUSES ORABPEL-08003 FAILED TO READ WSDL
# Bug 6731179 - INCREASED REQUESTS CAUSE OUTOFMEMORY ERRORS IN OC4J_SOA WHICH
# REQUIRES A RESTART
# Bug 6745591 - SYNC PROCESS <REPLY> FOLLOWED BY <THROW> CASE CAUSING
# OUTOFMEMORY ERRORS
# Bug 6396308 - UNABLE TO SEARCH FOR HUMAN TASK THAT INCLUDES TASK HISTORY
# FROM PREVIOUS TASK
# Bug 6455812 - DIRECT INVOCATION FROM ESB ROUTING SERVICE FAILS WHEN CALLED
# BPEL PROCESS
# Bug 6273370 - ESBLISTENERIMPL.ONFATALERROR GENERATING NPE ON CUSTOM ADAPTER
# Bug 6030243 - WORKFLOW NOTIFICATIONS FAILING WITHOUT BPELADMIN USER
# Bug 6473280 - INVOKING A .NET 3.0 SOAP SERVICE EXPOSED BY A ESB ENDPOINT
# GIVES A NPE
# BUGS ADDED IN MLR#4, 6748706 :
# Bug 6336442 - RESETTING ESB REPOSITORY DOES NOT CLEAR DB SLIDE REPOSITORY
# Bug 6316613 - MIDPROCESS ACTIVATION AGENT DOES NOT ACTIVATED FOR RETIRED
# BPEL PROCESS
# Bug 6368420 - SYSTEM IS NOT ASSIGNING TASK FOR REAPPROVAL AFTER REQUEST
# MORE INFO SUBMITTED
# Bug 6133670 - JDEV: UNABLE TO CREATE AN INTEGRATION SERVER CONNETION WHEN
# ESB IS ON HTTPS
# Bug 6681055 - TEXT ATTACHMENT CONTENT IS CORRUPTED
# Bug 6638648 - REQUEST HEADERS ARE NOT PASSED THROUGH TO THE OUTBOUND HEADER
# Bug 5521385 - [HA]PATCH01:ESB WILL LOSE TRACKING DATA WHEN JMS PROVIDER IS
# DOWN
# Bug 6759068 - WORKLIST APPLICATION PERFORMANCE DEGRADATION W/ SSL ENABLED
# FOR BPEL TO OVD
# BUGS ADDED IN MLR#5, 6782254 :
# Bug 6502310 - AUTOMATED RETRY ON FAILED INVOKE WITH CORRELATIONSET INIT
# FAILS
# Bug 6454795 - FAULT POLICY CHANGE NEEDS RESTART OF BPEL SERVER
# Bug 6732064 - FAILED TO READ WSDL ERROR ON THE CALLBACK ON RESTARTING BPEL
# OC4J CONTAINER
# Bug 6694313 - ZERO BYTE FILE WHEN REJECTEDMESSAGEHANDLERS FAILS
# Bug 6686528 - LINK IN APPLICATION.XML FILES CHANGED TO HARD LINKS WHEN MORE
# THAN 1 HT PRESENT
# Bug 6083024 - TEXT AND HTML DOC THAT RECEIVED AS ATTACHMENTS WERE EITHER
# BLANK OR GARBLED
# Bug 6638648 - REQUEST HEADERS ARE NOT PASSED THROUGH TO THE OUTBOUND HEADER
# Bug 6267726 - 10.1.3.3 ORACLE APPLICATIONS ADAPTER - NOT ABLE TO CAPTURE
# BUSINESS EVENT
# Bug 6774981 - NON-RETRYABLE ERRORS ARE NOT POSTED ON ESB_ERROR TOPIC
# Bug 6789177 - SFTP ADAPTER DOES NOT SUPPORT RENAMING FILES
# Bug 6809593 - BPEL UPGRADE TO 10.1.3.3.1 WITH ESB CALLS FAILS DUE TO
# CACHING OF PLNK - SERVICE
# BUGS ADDED IN MLR#6, 6823628 :
# Bug 6412909 - <BPELX:RENAME> DOES NOT ADD XMLNS DECLARATION AUTOMATICALLY
# Bug 6753116 - OUTPUT FROM HUMAN TASK IS NOT IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH
# SCHEMA
# ORDERING
# Bug 6832205 - BAD VERIFICATIONSERVICE PERFORMANCE IF LDAP SERVICE HAS HUGE
# DATA
# Bug 6189268 - CALLING BPEL PROCESS VIA SOAP FROM ESB FAILS WITH
# NAMENOTFOUNDEXCEPTION
# Bug 6834402 - JMS ADAPTER IMPROPERLY CASTS XAQUEUESESSION TO QUEUESESSION
# Bug 6073117 - TASK SERVICE DOESN'T RENDER THE TASK ACTIONS
# Bug 6054263 - REUSING SOAP WSDL IN RS CAUSES SOAP ACTION'S NS TO BE
# STRIPPED
# AWAY
# Bug 6489703 - ESB: NUMBER OF LISTENERS > 1 GIVES JMS EXCEPTION UNDER STRESS
# Bug 5679542 - FTP ADAPTER: COULD NOT PARSE TIME:
# JAVA.LANG.STRINGINDEXOUTOFBOUNDSEXCEPTION
# Bug 6770198 - AQ ACTIVATIONINSTANCES >1 DOESN'T WORK IN ESB
# Bug 6798779 - ESB ROUTING RULES CORRUPTED ON RE-REGISTERING WITH ROUTING
# ORDER
# IN WSDL CHANGED
# Bug 6617974 - BACKPORT REQUEST FOR MOVING FILES FUNCTION OF FTP ADAPTER
# Bug 6705707 - VALIDATION ON ESB CAN'T HANDLE NESTED SCHEMAS
# Bug 6414848 - FTP ADAPTER ARCHIVE FILENAME FOR BPEL IS BEING SCRAMBLED
# AFTER
# THE 10.1.3.3 UPGR
# Bug 5990764 - INFORMATION ARE LOST WHEN BPEL PROCESS IS POLLING FOR MAILS
# WITH
# ATTACHEMENTS
# Bug 6802070 - ORA-12899 SUBSCRIBER_ID/RES_SUBSCRIBER COLUMN SMALL FOR LONG
# DOMAIN AND PROCESS
# Bug 6753524 - WRONG SERVICE ENDPOINT OPEN WHEN TEST WEB SERVICE OF ESB
# Bug 6086434 - PROBLEM IN BPEL FILE ADAPTER WHILE READING A FIXED LENGTH
# FILE
# Bug 6823374 - BPEL 10.1.3.3.1 BAM SENSOR ACTION FAILS WITH BAM 11
# Bug 6819677 - HTTS STATUS 202 RETURNED INSTEAD OF SOAP FAULT
# Bug 6853301 - MQ ADAPTER REJECTED MESSAGES IS NOT REMOVED FROM THE RECOVERY
# QUEUE
# Bug 6847200 - 10.1.3.3.1 PATCH (#6748706) HAS STOPPED FTP ADAPTER POLLING
# IN
# SFTP MODE
# Bug 6895795 - AQ OUTBOUND DOESN'T WORK WITH MLR#6
업무에 참고하시기 바랍니다.

David,
You are right, theer are some changes incorporated in the latest MLR # 16 on the configurations files and on the dehydration store metrics(such as performance, fields,..).
However, I would not suggest to continue working on olite, even for Development/Test purposes as you might get stuck with strange errors...and the only solution would be to re-install SOA Suite if your olite gets corrupted. There might be ways to gets your olite back to position, but trust me..its not so simple.
Also, when you develop and stress test all your testcase scenarios in an TEST Adv installation, its simple to mimic the same in actual production box, as you exactly know its behavior.
So, go for a brand new SOA 10.1.3.4 MLR # 5 (or) 10.1.3.3.1 MLR # 16 SOA Suite Advanced installation with Oracle DB 10.2.0.3 as its dehydration store.
Hope this helps!
Cheers
Anirudh Pucha

WIDE-SCALE CALL FOR INPUT: The NSS 8TB Size Limit

NOTE: This thread is purposefully double-posted in the OES:Linux and OES:NetWare storage forums.
Like most of you -- I'm just a Novell customer. While I do not represent Novell in any official capacity, this call for information has been encouraged by Novell's OES team.
During this week's OES2SP3 Beta conference call, a topic was brought up again regarding the aging size limit of the NSS file-system.
Quite simply the current NSS file system size limit of 8TB is too small for modern and emerging needs. The reality is that customer data is trending larger all the time. A failure to act quickly will eventually mean the obsolecense of this file-system and apathy in the customer base.
Novell will be monitoring this thread. If sufficent interest can be documented then Novell could more easily marshall the needed internal resources to make this happen sooner rather than later.
WHAT THIS THREAD IS -NOT- INTENDED TO BECOME
- A discussion of how one could use DFS or other techniques to mitigate NSS' size constraint.
- A string of suggestions for alternative file-systems such as NTFS or Posix-based one like XFS, BTRFS, EXT4
- A debate on why people should not want a larger-than-8TB file-system. That debate is effectively over -- almost every major player in the file-system space is doing anything from 64TB into the Exabyte range (XFS, NTFS, others).
WHAT THIS THREAD IS INTENDED FOR
- A tally of other Novell customers who DO see the need and would prefer to keep this data on NSS if it could accomodate it. Your post can be as simple as: "This is important to us, too!" Also helpful, though not required, would be a brief statement or case-study of what your needs would look like (types of data, overall size and quantity of files).
On the beta calls, several of us have been vocal supporters for this change. We now hope that by casting a wider net that we can find others who perhaps have been suffering in silence.

Originally Posted by Elfstone
NOTE: This thread is purposefully double-posted in the OES:Linux and OES:NetWare storage forums.
Quite simply the current NSS file system size limit of 8TB is too small for modern and emerging needs. The reality is that customer data is trending larger all the time. A failure to act quickly will eventually mean the obsolecense of this file-system and apathy in the customer base.
I have a couple instances where the 8TB limit is "inconvenient," but all are for comparatively small numbers of large files. As a practical matter the bottlenecks in the metadata are reached far in advance of the storage limits. For example, how would a NSS volume perform with 100,000,000 files on it? This is the biggest issue.
So sure, there are things which could be done to expand NSS. As a practical matter the easiest would be to support larger block sizes. So 8TB becomes 16, becomes 32, ... all the way to 128TB. I assume 128TB would handle your needs. Of course how you back up and restore 128 TB in less than the age of the Universe, that's up to you.
-- Bob

IPTComm 2010 Call for Papers: Deadline Extended

CALL FOR PAPERS: DEADLINE EXTENDED
4th ACM Conference on Principles, Systems and Applications of IP Telecommunications
IPTComm 2010
http://www.iptcomm.org
August 2-3, 2010
Leibniz Supercomputing Center
Munich, Germany
IMPORTANT DATES
================
Paper registration: Midnight, March 5, 2010.
Paper submission: Midnight March 19th, 2010 (Firm deadline).
Notification of acceptance: May 21st, 2010.
Final camera-ready submission: June 30th, 2010.
Conference dates: August 2-3, 2010.
The paper submission deadline has been extended to March 19, 2010.
However, authors are required to register with EDAS and submit
their paper abstract by the original deadline of Midnight March 5,
2010.
The IP communications domain has matured beyond providing VoIP only
services. Universities, enterprises, businesses and individual
consumers routinely use VoIP. The focus of IP communications is now on
the operations, management, administration and provisioning aspects of
large-scale, reliable and secure communication systems. To this extent,
the research and standardization work now includes log file analysis,
session tracing across proxy meshes and overload control. As IP
communications grapples with these issues, newer technologies in the
form of cloud-based IP communication systems; peer-to-peer VoIP
networks; use of IP communications in virtual worlds; social
networks and IP communications are starting to assert a strong
presence in the IP communications domain.
The aim of the IPTComm conference is to serve as a platform for
researchers from academia, research labs, industry and government to
share their ideas, views, results and experiences in the field of
IP-based telecommunication. IPTComm will include presentations of
theoretical and experimental achievements, innovative systems,
prototyping efforts, case studies, and advancements in technology.
We invite authors to submit papers in the following and related areas:
New services and service models
* Over-the-top services.
* Social networking and IP communications.
* IP telecommunications in virtual worlds.
* Compositional services and model checking.
* Cloud-based IP communications infrastructure.
* Rapid application development frameworks.
* APIs and enablers for IP communication services.
* Browser-based IP communication services.
* Context-aware communication services.
* IMS and NGN services.
Management and Resilience
* Advantages and disadvantages of IP communications as a P2P
application.
* Advances in P2P overlays for IP communications systems.
* Management of IP communications systems and networks.
* Overload management schemes for IP communications.
* Log files and log file analysis for IP communication systems.
* Scalability of large-scale IP communication systems.
* Traffic and QoS measurement of VoIP traffic.
* Self-tuning and self-monitoring IP communications systems.
* Service discovery.
* Energy consumption and energy management in IP communication
systems.
* Incentives in P2P IP communication systems.
* Resilience in P2P IP communication system.
Security
* Identity management for IP communications systems.
* Anonymity and privacy in IP communications.
* Forensics and diagnostics in IP communication systems.
* Techniques to detect, mitigate and prevent SPIT, phreaking
and vishing.
* Denial of service detection and prevention.
Mobile IP Communications
* Mobile IP communication services.
* Mobility in cloud-based IP communications infrastructure.
* Mobile P2P IP communication systems.
Miscellaneous
* The role of IP communications in the power grid.
* Open source development in IP communications.
* Research issues in vertical IP communication markets (e.g.,
privacy in the medical field, location in logistical
field, etc.)
* Regulatory issues in IP communications.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
==================
Papers submission is handled by EDAS (http://edas.info/N8459).
IPTComm solicits full papers up to 12 pages in length, in two-column
ACM conference format
(see http://www.acm.org/sigs/publications/proceedings-templates). All
submissions must describe original research, not published nor
currently under review for another conference or journal. The program
committee will referee all papers, and accepted papers will be
published in the conference proceedings. Papers will also be published in
the ACM Digital Library.
In 2010, IPTComm will be accepting short papers of at least 5 pages and
no more than 6 pages. The aim of the short paper category is to help
maintain a published record of work carried out as well as facilitate
future affiliations and foster collaborative work. Short papers are
subject to the same rigorous review process as full papers and follow
the same submission process, schedule and expectation of presentation as
the full papers.
IMPORTANT DATES
================
Paper registration: Midnight, March 5, 2010.
Paper submission: Midnight March 19th, 2010 (Firm deadline).
Notification of acceptance: May 21st, 2010.
Final camera-ready submission: June 30th, 2010.
Conference dates: August 2-3, 2010.
Conference Location: Leibniz Supercomputing Center, Munich, Germany.
CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS
====================
Georg Carle (Technical University of Munich)
Helmut Reiser (Leibniz Supercomputing Center)
TPC CO-CHAIRS
=============
Gonzalo Camarillo (Ericsson Research)
Vijay K. Gurbani (Bell Laboratories/Alcatel-Lucent)
DEMONSTRATION AND INDUSTRY TALKS CO-CHAIRS
==========================================
Carol Davids (Illinois Institute of Technology)
Saverio Niccolini (NEC Laboratories Europe)
PUBLICITY CHAIR
===============
Gregory Bond (AT&T Research)
Steering Committee
==================
Gregory Bond (AT&T Research)
Saverio Niccolini (NEC Laboratories Europe)
Henning Schulzrinne (Columbia University)
Dorgham Sisalem (Tekelec)
Radu State (University of Luxembourg)
TPC MEMBERS
===========
John Buford Avaya Labs Research
Eric Chen NTT Corporation
Eric Cheung AT&T Labs - Research
Tasos Dagiuklas Technological Educational Institute of Mesolonghi
Carol Davids Illinois Institute of Technology
Ali Fessi Technical University of Munich
Rosario Garroppo University of Pisa
Aniruddha Gokhale Vanderbilt University
Swapna Gokhale University of Connecticut
Carmen Guerrero University Carlos III of Madrid
Christian Hoene University of Tubingen
Alan Jeffrey Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
Cullen Jennings Cisco
Salvatore Loreto Ericsson
Jouni Maenpaa Ericsson
Enrico Marocco Telecom Italia
Joerg Ott Helsinki University of Technology
Victor Pascual Avila Acme Packets
Joachim Posegga University of Passau
Anand Prasad NEC Corporation
Yacine Rebahi Fraunhofer Institut Fokus, Berlin
Ivica Rimac Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
Ronaldo Salles Military Institute of Engineering (Brazil)
Stefano Salsano University of Rome "Tor Vergata"
Jan Seedorf NEC Europe Ltd.
Jose Solar Technical University of Denmark
Ivan Vidal University Carlos III of Madrid
Xiaotao Wu Avaya Labs Research
Pamela Zave AT&T Laboratories

Reminder: Our call for papers is closing on Monday 27th July. Be sure to send your abstracts to [[email protected]]
We also have a Twitter account and will be posting updates via that. Se sure to follow: aus_ora_spatial
Ross.

IPTComm 2010: Call for Papers

****** NOTE: Submissions due on Mar 5, 2010 *******
IPTCOMM 2010
============
The Fourth Conference on Principles, Systems and Applications of
IP Telecommunications
August 2 and 3, 2010
Leibniz Supercomputing Center
Munich, Germany
http://iptcomm.org
The IP communications domain has matured beyond providing VoIP only
services. Universities, enterprises, businesses and individual
consumers routinely use VoIP. The focus of IP communications is now on
the operations, management, administration and provisioning aspects of
large-scale, reliable and secure communication systems. To this extent,
the research and standardization work now includes log file analysis,
session tracing across proxy meshes and overload control. As IP
communications grapples with these issues, newer technologies in the
form of cloud-based IP communication systems; peer-to-peer VoIP
networks; use of IP communications in virtual worlds; social
networks and IP communications are starting to assert a strong
presence in the IP communications domain.
The aim of the IPTComm conference is to serve as a platform for
researchers from academia, research labs, industry and government to
share their ideas, views, results and experiences in the field of
IP-based telecommunication. IPTComm will include presentations of
theoretical and experimental achievements, innovative systems,
prototyping efforts, case studies, and advancements in technology.
We invite authors to submit papers in the following and related areas:
New services and service models
* Over-the-top services.
* Social networking and IP communications.
* IP telecommunications in virtual worlds.
* Compositional services and model checking.
* Cloud-based IP communications infrastructure.
* Rapid application development frameworks.
* APIs and enablers for IP communication services.
* Browser-based IP communication services.
* Context-aware communication services.
* IMS and NGN services.
Management and Resilience
* Advantages and disadvantages of IP communications as a P2P
application.
* Advances in P2P overlays for IP communications systems.
* Management of IP communications systems and networks.
* Overload management schemes for IP communications.
* Log files and log file analysis for IP communication systems.
* Scalability of large-scale IP communication systems.
* Traffic and QoS measurement of VoIP traffic.
* Self-tuning and self-monitoring IP communications systems.
* Service discovery.
* Energy consumption and energy management in IP communication
systems.
* Incentives in P2P IP communication systems.
* Resilience in P2P IP communication system.
Security
* Identity management for IP communications systems.
* Anonymity and privacy in IP communications.
* Forensics and diagnostics in IP communication systems.
* Techniques to detect, mitigate and prevent SPIT, phreaking
and vishing.
* Denial of service detection and prevention.
Mobile IP Communications
* Mobile IP communication services.
* Mobility in cloud-based IP communications infrastructure.
* Mobile P2P IP communication systems.
Miscellaneous
* The role of IP communications in the power grid.
* Open source development in IP communications.
* Research issues in vertical IP communication markets (e.g.,
privacy in the medical field, location in logistical
field, etc.)
* Regulatory issues in IP communications.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
==================
Papers submission is handled by EDAS (http://edas.info/N8459).
IPTComm solicits full papers up to 12 pages in length, in two-column
ACM conference format
(see http://www.acm.org/sigs/publications/proceedings-templates). All
submissions must describe original research, not published nor
currently under review for another conference or journal. The program
committee will referee all papers, and accepted papers will be
published in the conference proceedings. Pending cooperation agreements,
papers will also be published in the ACM Digital Library.
In 2010, IPTComm will be accepting short papers of at least 5 pages and
no more than 6 pages. The aim of the short paper category is to help
maintain a published record of work carried out as well as facilitate
future affiliations and foster collaborative work. Short papers are
subject to the same rigorous review process as full papers and follow
the same submission process, schedule and expectation of presentation as
the full papers.
IMPORTANT DATES
================
Paper submission: Midnight March 5th, 2010.
Notification of acceptance: May 21st, 2010.
Final camera-ready submission: June 30th, 2010.
Conference dates: August 2-3, 2010.
Conference Location: Leibniz Supercomputing Center, Munich, Germany.
CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS
====================
Georg Carle (Technical University of Munich)
Helmut Reiser (Leibniz Supercomputing Center)
TPC CO-CHAIRS
=============
Gonzalo Camarillo (Ericsson Research)
Vijay K. Gurbani (Bell Laboratories/Alcatel-Lucent)
DEMONSTRATION AND INDUSTRY TALKS CO-CHAIRS
==========================================
Carol Davids (Illinois Institute of Technology)
Saverio Niccolini (NEC Laboratories Europe)
PUBLICITY CHAIR
===============
Gregory Bond (AT&T Research)
Steering Committee
==================
Gregory Bond (AT&T Research)
Saverio Niccolini (NEC Laboratories Europe)
Henning Schulzrinne (Columbia University)
Dorgham Sisalem (Tekelec)
Radu State (University of Luxembourg)
TPC MEMBERS
===========
John Buford Avaya Labs Research
Eric Chen NTT Corporation
Eric Cheung AT&T Labs - Research
Tasos Dagiuklas Technological Educational Institute of Mesolonghi
Carol Davids Illinois Institute of Technology
Ali Fessi Technical University of Munich
Rosario Garroppo University of Pisa
Aniruddha Gokhale Vanderbilt University
Swapna Gokhale University of Connecticut
Carmen Guerrero University Carlos III of Madrid
Christian Hoene University of Tubingen
Alan Jeffrey Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
Cullen Jennings Cisco
Salvatore Loreto Ericsson
Jouni Maenpaa Ericsson
Enrico Marocco Telecom Italia
Joerg Ott Helsinki University of Technology
Victor Pascual Avila Acme Packets
Joachim Posegga University of Passau
Anand Prasad NEC Corporation
Yacine Rebahi Fraunhofer Institut Fokus, Berlin
Ivica Rimac Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
Ronaldo Salles Military Institute of Engineering (Brazil)
Stefano Salsano University of Rome "Tor Vergata"
Jan Seedorf NEC Europe Ltd.
Jose Solar Technical University of Denmark
Ivan Vidal University Carlos III of Madrid
Xiaotao Wu Avaya Labs Research
Pamela Zave AT&T Laboratories

Reminder: Our call for papers is closing on Monday 27th July. Be sure to send your abstracts to [[email protected]]
We also have a Twitter account and will be posting updates via that. Se sure to follow: aus_ora_spatial
Ross.

Zfs volumes broken post os patching - spec_getpage called for character...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for