ZMRBR - invoices released but not in FBL1N

Hello everybody,
I have a problem with a few invoices which were released in ZMRBR (through management approval) but the invoices were not automatically released in FBL1N. But because the invoices had to be paid quickly, I had to manually release them through FB02.
Does anybody know why the released invoices in ZMRBR were not also automatically released in FBL1N?
Thanks for your help.

Hi,
What do you mean by not released? Parked, Blocked for payment, etc?
ZMRBR is custom transaction. If you're not using a standard program we'll not be able to help much since we don't know which
program was used and what it does. You'd have to check it with your ABAP team.
Is it reproducible or was it an one time error?
Regards,
REnan Correa

Similar Messages

Can TMS warn of objects on released-but-not-imported requests?

I'm sure this is a common problem: Developer A makes a change to an ABAP program, releases his transport, and imports it to the QA system. Developer B makes a subsequent change to the same program (unaware of Developer A's changes), realeases his transport and imports it to QA. Developer B's QA testing completes first, and his transport is imported to the Production system. Some time later, Developer A's QA testing is completed, and his transport moves to Prod, wiping out Developer B's changes!
How do we avoid this situation? Is there a way to configure TMS so that it warns Developer B of Developer A's released-but-not-yet-imported-to-Prod transport?
I am open to all suggestions, including activating user exits in TMS, and coding the warning myself. If that's the only solution, some guidance on TMS user exits and TMS tables I would need to query would be helpful.
Thanks in advance.

Well, this thread may be 4 years old, but I have answered my own question (some time ago), and would like to share the answer with the SDN community.
I ended up activating the BADI CTS_REQUEST_CHECK. In the CHECK_BEFORE_RELEASE method I added my own code to check for "incomplete" transports for any of the objects on the transport being released. The code is pretty involved, but the basic trick is to SELECT all transports for each of the objects in the request from database tables E070, E071, and E07T, then use function TR_READ_GLOBAL_INFO_OF_REQUEST to get the details of each request to determine if it has been imported into the production system.
Once I have a list of "potentially conflicting" transports, I display it for the user in an ALV grid. I then allow the user to decide whether to go on with the release of the transport, or to cancel the release.
Cheers,
Terry

Invoice Recd but not goods

In my Company, I have recived the Invoice. But the goods are not recieved.
So i will be unable to pass MIGO entry as no goods are recieved. So what should i do to show Goods in transit entry. Also i want to know what needs to be done with Invoice recd.
Should i pass manual entry as Goods in TRansit A/c Dr
To Provision for goods

You can book a manual invoice through any FI transaction like F-43,FB60 but it will not be linked to the purchase order or goods receipt.So you can book invoice through MIRO and then subsequently after goods receipt if there is any difference then pass credit memo through MIRO. The balance in GR/IR clearing account would basically represent Invoice recd but not goods.
Thanks and regards
Kedar

Invoice cancelled but not closed

Hi there,
I canceled an invoice using vf11. The S1 canceling document was created but not released to finance. The next day when I tried to release into FI using vf02 I encountered the below message: "Post.Date is infer.to the date of the last posted doc. with same n° range". Can you please advice what should I do to create the accounting document and match it with the invoice?
Thank you,
Silvia

This is not the standard error but due to customized process. Check with your technical team as to why and what validation is there preventing the process.
G. Lakshmipathi

Released but not imported tp orders

Hi Experts!
Is there a away to list released (approved in D/Q environment) but not imported transport orders ?
I read all posts regarding FM's around tms, but couldnt find a away to get that orders !
Thanks in advance,
Pedro

Hi,
If you want Transport Requests, then,
Check tables, E070, E07T, E070A.
Use func modile: 'STRF_READ_COFILE' to get the log for the transports.
If you are talking abt transport orders, then you need to still explore.
Regards,
Subramanian

Excise Invoices Captured but not posted.

Hi,
How can I see the list of all excise invoices that are captured but not posted. Also list of excise invoices that are cancelled.
Regards
Ayyallas

Hi Ayyallas,
Have you tried transaction J2IUN and using the button "Display pending invoice".
You might also be able to see this in table J_1IEXCHDR with field STATUS.
Hope this helps,
Adam.

LabWindows DLL crash in Release, but not Debug

My LabWindows 2012 CVI application crashes when executing DLL function in Release 64 mode, but not Debug 64 mode. The 64-bit DLL was created in Matlab, and executes Matlab functionality.
The Just In Time debugger comes up right when the DLL function has finished executing. If I link the process to LabWindows I get the following error:
A non-debuggable thread caused a 'General Protection' fault at address
Any ideas?

Hi softengr,
I would recommend determining whether this problem occurs because of the difference in speed between the debug and release modes of LabWindows/CVI. To do this, reduce the number of debug options by navigating to Options » Build Options..., and select No run-time checking for the Debugging level. You can also disable some features from the Environment options dialog by unchecking features in the Debug section (Options » Environment...).
You can also try to change the parameters of the Release build by changing parameters in the Build options.
Are you doing any dynamic memory management inside your DLL? Are you able to troubleshoot your DLL to find a specific line which causes this crash?
Any additional information about how you are calling your DLL, whether your DLL calls functions asynchronously, etc. would be very helpful and appreciated.
Warm Regards,
Daniel D.
National Instruments
Automated Test Software R&D

Impact of just parking invoice doc, but not posting???

I would like to know the risk/constrain involved with the below process, which may not be a standard practice.
1. Service Provider maintains Classic SRM/ECC. Customer maintains own ECC.
2. Shopping cart created in SRM and PO generated in ECC of Service provider.
3. PO transferred to Customer ECC. Invoice posting, Payment and FI activities are carried out in customer ECC.
4. Basic Invoice Information is transferred back to Service provider ECC, so this invoice will be shown as follow on document in the shopping cart. It will show only the invoice number and it is only for the informational purpose. There is neither finance activity nor any reporting are made out that system.
Service provider just want to Park the document and not to post it, so it won't hit the GL account. This eliminates considerable work FI configuration settings.
Question is whether this unorthodox method of just parking, but not posting will cause any impact/risk, even though no FI activities is carried on that system.

It is not a normal practice and does not fulfill the intent of the park process but as long as you have controls around preventing those parked documents from being posted this should probably work.
Consider them to be a little akin to delivery accruals that are never matched to an invoice, my thoughts are you might want to HOLD rather than PARK these documents.
You will also need to consider what your long term housekeeping and archiving strategy will be for these essentially orphaned documents.

Receivable Invoice Posted but Not Accounted

I created a Manual receivable Invoice as normaly but when I run the create accounting process it doesn't work well, invoice was completed and posted but the create accounting in GL doesn't create the batch journal and we can't see it in the GL Lines. Can anybody tell me if this trouble is on the GL_INTERFACE and if you have any script to find the wrong validation?

This is not the standard error but due to customized process. Check with your technical team as to why and what validation is there preventing the process.
G. Lakshmipathi

PO is deleted after GR and Invoice done, but not reverting GR IR values

Hi,
Whenever PO line item is deleted with deletion indicator value L, I can see 2 extra entries for Process key 001, with negative Qty and amount values. But for process key 002 (GR) and 003 (IR) values are not getting reverted. So in BW I am getting 0 PO qty and value (based on process key 001 and addition of negative values). But non zero GR values (process key 002) and IR values (Process key 003).
Data source I am using is 2LIS_02_SCL and 2LIs_02_ITM.
Regards,
ST

Hi,
I am not pretty sure but may be answer to your question lies in the question of below thread.
2LIS_02_ITM vs 2LIS_02_SCL
It appears that for process keys 2 and 3, the datasource 2LIS_02_ITM doesn't bring values. These would be comiing in your cube/ DSO from 2lis_02_SCL

DC created and activities released but not sync

Hi everyone, I´m working with a B2B custom app, I have created a DC, link the used public DC´s etc etc . . .and then make a custom project from this, I already make deploys and everything is working, the DC are shown in Inactive DC.....
well, the problem is that I want to work with another NWDS from a remote location, but when I download again the configuration from this other NWDS i didn´t found the custom DC I previously created, I look for the activities created in the dc creation but no activities are shown. How can I sync this DC - Custom project in order to download the latest version from other NWDS ???

Dear Isaac,
It seems like your DC are not "checked-in" to DTR.
After successful tests of the changes in the local J2EE server, the developers "check-in" the changed resources into the development workspace (DEV workspace) of the DTR. The sources then become visible to all other developers.
You can also check the development workspace (DEV Inactive workspace) of the DTR of your track.
Open DTR Web UI, and navigate till <TrackName_Dev> / Inactive / DCs /
Under the above mentioned path, check whether the desired DCs are present or not?
Let me know about your findings.
Regards,
Shreyas Pandya

Change request released & but not visible

Hi kaushal & all,
Customizing change request is released from development system & data file & co-files are not generated which inturn i can't manage to
see the request in queue.Also log is not visible for the released request.

Hi,
Customizing change request is released from development system & data file & co-files are not generated
For the above reason only two possibilities if STMS configuration is proper.
- Request is local request
- No target system is define in released request.
in your development system run se01 -> in display tab enter request -> press enter.
double click on request -> select properties tab -> make sure target system indicate your QAS system.
regards,
kaushal

New Marvell (beta) Controller Driver is Released - but not for MSI?

I've been following the Marvell controller situation pretty closely the past week or so because of the BSOD it's been causing on my board.
ASUS has just posted a new Marvell driver for the 91XX, which is on the XPower (88SE9128) and I assume many other X-58 boards.
My question is, does Marvell release one driver that's compatible with all the X-58 boards? Or do they make one for each manufacturer?
I'm very anxious to try it, see if it helps with the BSOD. Should I wait until MSI posts it on their download page, or am I waiting in vain because maybe they never post Beta releases?
Thank you guys!

Thanks Clay - I never did install the MSU software. I was using the most current driver on MSI's site - the 1.0.0.1047 WHQL.
I've asked around about station-drivers and some say they're fine, others say basically what you did, "be careful."
They've had the 1.2.00.1002 on their site for awhile, and now I see ASUS has it on their site for their X-58 boards. It's listed as a "Beta."
Not sure if I'll even bother with it. I rolled back to the msahci and I'm getting the performance I was was getting originally. I think it was only the last official driver - the 1047 - that caused all (or most) of the problems for me.

Goods Issues but not invoiced

Hello forum, a question on any Sales/Billing reports people know of for goods that have been goods issued but are awaiting invoicing. We use POD processing and can get some reports but none with a financial value at an item level. We also use tcode VF04 to view pending deliveries to be invoiced but again doesnt show any epxected revenue and so was wondering if there are any other standard reports to give me this information?
Much appreciated
Dan

Through standard TCodes VF04 and VF06, you can generate deliveries that are PGId but not invoiced but value will not flow there. For this, you need to develop a zee tcode considering the tables VBAP (for unit price) and LIPS (for material code and quantity PGId).
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Goods Shipped -BUT- Not Invoiced

Hi Gurus,
we would like to see a report (NOT VF04), where I can see all the Goods Shipped But not invoiced with AMOUNT so that we can Tie this amount to respective Goods in Transit GL account balance for Auditing Purpose, so that we can tell them this is the actual amount in Transit needs to be invoiced by showing report and GL account,
Please Help me , your help appreciated,
Sandhya

Sri Nath,
I think you missed the whole point here, I am not talking about exchange rates ro amount going from Sales order to GL , it will go anyways as I am talking about the Inventory Transfer account Amount and the Goods Shipped But Not Invoiced report amount ,
Let me explain again, you will see some Del Doc ," Y " (Sales Order "X" ) in VL06 and you will come to know this is Open Invoice and Goods Shipped already,,,,,,,, at the same time for this Delivery Doc , Y , for the amount in sales order, X , will be reflecting in that GL account ,
So Now the Point is VL06 or or anyother report with the options you said, will give you Del Doc Y , as Output but NO DOLLAR AMOUNT, so How can I tie this Del Doc amount(s) If I don't see a consolidated total that I need to Tie with FS10N report,?
Shiva making new Report is last Option I believe.
Sandhya

ZMRBR - invoices released but not in FBL1N

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for