Zpool creation in SC 3.2

This question is typical FAQ but I could not find an answer in the documentation.
Q.How do I create zpool in SC3.2 environment?
My intuition says I should use the DID device names like in SVM case, but I get:
# zpool create tank /dev/did/rdsk/d8
cannot use '/dev/did/rdsk/d8': must be a block device or regular fileTIA and Happy Holidays,
-- leon

Anyway it's not working:
# zpool create tank /dev/did/dsk/d8
cannot open '/dev/rdsk/d8s2': No such file or directory
# zpool create tank /dev/did/dsk/d8s2
cannot open '/dev/did/dsk/d8s2': I/O errorI'll RTFM...
Danke,
-- leon

Similar Messages

[SOLVED] Zpool creation fails with error

New to Arch (not to linux) and I've done this in my test environment without problem. I'm trying to create a zpool, and I get the following:
[root@nas ~]# zpool create -f -o ashift=12 tank raidz2 ata-WL4000GSA6472E_WOL240277978 ata-WL4000GSA6472E_WOL240277990 ata-WL4000GSA6472E_WOL240278668 ata-WL4000GSA6472E_WOL240278708 ata-WL4000GSA6472E_WOL240291009 ata-WL4000GSA6472E_WOL240291031 ata-WL4000GSA6472E_WOL240291056
the kernel failed to rescan the partition table: 16
cannot label 'sdd': try using parted(8) and then provide a specific slice: -1
Version and package particulars:
[root@nas ~]# uname -a
Linux nas.priv 3.15.5-2-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Jul 11 07:56:02 CEST 2014 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[root@nas ~]# pacman -Q zfs-git
zfs-git 0.6.3_r0_g07dabd2_3.15.5_2-2
The controller I'm using is a cross-flashed IBM 1015.
I used sgdisk -Z /dev/sd<x> to clear any partitions, after I started seeing this. I cleared all eight drives.
I've tried using the wwn names for the disks as well as the sd<x> nomenclature and I get the same or similar errors (the device changes based on the first one in the list).
Last edited by Hrast (2014-07-28 01:54:18)

Have you tried running the command multiple times back to back? It might just work. In this ticket someone also shoved `udevadm trigger` in between each try. I cannot vouch for this approach, but I cannot see any harm either.
Have the drives been used previously by ZFS? If so, maybe the labels are not in the expected locations. You might consider using dd to zero out the MBT/GPT manually. I know sgdisk -Z did not work for me in a particular instance that I had to replace a drive. Keep in mind that unlike a MBT, GPT is both at the start and end of a drive. The seek option of dd (as opposed to skip) is what you'd want.
Still, I know I've personally run into this issue before. It certainly can be frustrating. And it can feel like you're beating around a bush just to get it to work. Here is a fairly recent ticket with essentially your same issue.
Last edited by NVS (2014-07-28 01:16:15)

Zpool Create

Hello,
I have recently made an error in zpool creation. I have expanded the drive used in my VMware machine and attempted to fdisk a partition and create a zpool using it. Unfortunately, I have created (and now destroyed) a zpool pool using the primary partition which is the location of the root pool. The system seems to be running fine with a database and no errors have occurred as of yet. I recreated the scenario on another vm using solaris 10 and found that something in the boot loader became corrupted (system reboot lead to a grub hang i.e. frozen system). The solution was to reinstall grub on s0 using a live recovery disk (where the root partition was located) and everything booted back normally. I investigated further and recreated another zpool on the primary partition and destroyed it. I then installed grub prior to reboot and the system booted normally. I have tested this thoroughly in that if I create/destroy a pool on the primary partition and do not install grub prior to reboot the system will display GRUB _ but be frozen and I will need to use a live cd to boot into single user mode, mount the os and install grub again. I can't find any documentation on what zpool create does with regard to the disk entries. Could someone please point me towards some documentation, or explain what zpool create is doing to the disk to cause grub to become "corrupted?".
Thanks.

Alright, again thanks for the help. I think we are missing eachother on the Solaris partition vs an FDISK partition. You basically have it correct in the post above. The best solution is to create another harddrive altogether and use that one. I am going to go through my understanding to ensure we are on the same page as I am pretty knew to this.
When Solaris is installed, an fdisk partition is created and solaris is installed inside that partition. The default is to consume the whole FDisk partition (c0t0d0p1). And inside of the FDisk partition it creates slices (Solaris partitioning). By default Solaris will install the root pool on s0 and consume all cylinders (example 1-16000) with cylinder 0 being the boot information (viewable by going to Format->partition->print). Now to Solaris' knowledge, the disk has a total of 16000 cylinders. However, a vm harddrive can be expanded to make a larger harddrive. So what happens is FDisk can see this larger hard drive (for example the number of cylinders goes from a total of 16000 cylinders to 32000 cylinders). Unfortunately, Solaris doesn't recognize the larger disk size and still displays the total cylinders of the disk as 16000. Note, you can turn auto expand on and detect the larger hard drive using ZFS, but that is not the route we are going to take.
I will simplify this in steps because it can be confusing.
Solaris installation:
FDisk partition is created and labeled using the whole drive (all 16000 cylinders). This is known as c0t0d0p1.
Solaris then installs the root pool inside this partition on s0 (by default consuming all of the cylinders). Now s0 is solaris's version of partitioning.
You now have your basic solaris installation inside c0t0d0p1.
s0 rootpool (cylinders 1-16000)
s1 blank
s2 blank
s3 backup etc.
For examples sake. This can be viewed by going into format->partition->print.
Now Solaris has created its own partition table of the drive with s0-s9 (s15 on x86). With a record of 16000 cylinders total. Forgive me if the numbers are not entirely accurate.
Now we increase the size of this harddrive on the vm from 16000 cylinders to 32000 cylinders ( say 100GB to 200GB to keep the numbers simple).
Now Solaris has no knowledge of this increase (and reports in format->partition->print that the drive size is still only 16000 cylinders).
However, if you go into FDisk, you will notice that partition 1 is 16000 cylinders, but you will see that the total number of cylinders has increased to 32000.
Now you create a second partition using cylinders 16001 to 32000. This is known as c0t0d0p2.
Now, you can create a storage pool using the command:
#zpool create rpool2 c0t0d0p2
#zpool status
and you will see a second pool of equal size to the first pool. However, this second pool is using cylinders 16001 to 32000 of the harddrive (i.e. c0t0d0p2).
You can continue to increase the size of the underlying hard drive and create a total of 4 partitions (maximum number of allowed partitions using fdisk).
Now you said I should have received a warning if I created a pool using c0t0d0s0. Which is absolutely correct if I was attempting to overwrite the location of the root pool (which is s0 according to solaris). However, if we step one above this, FDisk has no knowledge what is inside this partition other than it is of type solaris.
I hope this all makes sense, I am still very new to this so its hard for me to articulate it well.
Now my question. When using zpool create on a partition, rather than a solaris slice, what does this do to the disk itself. It writes directly to the drive but I want to know exactly what and where it writes this data to. Documentation or a point in the right direction would be very helpful. Again, this is a unique situation that I can't find anywhere on the internet.
Thanks

Fields in Creation of free goods VBN1

hi everybody,
Can somebody expalin in detail the fields in creation of free goods(T-vbn1) like free goods quantity,additional quantity,documnet quantity and calculation rule....
<b>Please dont copy paste anything form SAP help....I read that one......</b>
I would appreciate if u explain with your sentence..
Will reward point if it helps.
Ghassan

Hi Gafoor,
Material
Material, for which free goods is to be
granted
Minimum quantity
Minimum quantity for which free
goods can be granted
From
Quantity of sales material
FGQ--- Quantity unit of free goods material
Free goods -- Quantity of free goods with reference to the quantity and quantity unit of the sales material.
AQU - Quantity unit of the free goods additional quantity
Rule - Calculation rule
Prorata
whole units
unit related
D -- Delivery controlling - it tells how you can manage the delivery of free goods with respect to the main item ordered.
Additional material - Additional material (only available for entry in exclusive free goods)
Hope it helps. Please reward if helpful.
Thanks & Regards
Sadhu Kishore

Account determination error - in creation of invoice

Hello experts,
i have an error in creation of invoice, after( pgi post goods issue)
will you please help me out to solve this error.
thanks & Regards,
yogesh raina

hello sir,
After going throuth this path it shows no gl account in account determination chart
as below
Condition type     Message     Description
ZPR0                                  123     Access KOFI not carried out (initialized field)
Access     Message     Description
10     123     Access KOFI not carried out (initialized field)
20     121     No G/L account found in Account determination type KOFI
30     123     Access KOFI not carried out (initialized field)
40     121     No G/L account found in Account determination type KOFI
50     121     No G/L account found in Account determination type KOFI
60     123     Access KOFI not carried out (initialized field)

Automatic PO creation of free text PR

Hi!
We have all our PRs in free text since we are not yet using material master. One of our purchase organization will only order from one vendor and they will enter that vendor and price in the PR. Is it possible to create a PO automatically from that PR without a material or source list?
Sincerely
Anders

Hi
Thank you very much. Is it possible to restrict the automatic creation to a certain purchase organization?
If I understand you right:
1) Create PR with item category D Service
2) Activate automatic PO creation in ML91
That will create POs for all PRs created as a service?
Sincerely
Anders

Issue in creation of plant related data at receiving server using BD10

Hi all,
This is regarding Material master creation using B10.I am using MATMAS05 message type for sending data from one system to another.Data is sent and received successfully.When i go in mm03 i can see all the views created successfully accept views related to PLANT.Please guide to resolve the issue.
When i entered into Log-
1)"The field MBEW-BKLAS is defined as a required field; it does not contain an entry".
2)"No material master data exists for material AB_08.04.09(30) in plant 4001".
My segemnt is as follows-
ZMATMAS05                      matmas05
       E1MARAM                        Master material general data (MARA)
           Z1KLART                        KLART----
My extention
           E1MARA1                        Additional Fields for E1MARAM
           E1MAKTM                        Master material short texts (MAKT)
           E1MARCM                        Master material C segment (MARC)
               Z1AUSPM                        E1AUSPMDistribution of Classification:----
My extention
               E1MARC1                        Additional Fields for E1MARCM
               E1MARDM                        Master material warehouse/batch segment (MARD)
               E1MFHMM                        Master material production resource/tool (MFHM)
               E1MPGDM                        Master material product group
               E1MPOPM                        Master material forecast parameter
               E1MPRWM                        Master material forecast value
               E1MVEGM                        Master material total consumption
               E1MVEUM                        Master material unplanned consumption
               E1MKALM                        Master material production version
           E1MARMM                        Master material units of measure (MARM)
           E1MBEWM                        Master material material valuation (MBEW)
           E1MLGNM                        Master material material data per warehouse number (MLGN)
           E1MVKEM                        Master material sales data (MVKE)
           E1MLANM                        Master material tax classification (MLAN)
           E1MTXHM                        Master material long text header
           E1CUCFG                        CU: Configuration data
       E1UPSLINK                      Reference from Object to Superior UPS
Thanks.
Edited by: sanu debu on Apr 27, 2009 7:10 PM

CREATE CONTROLFILE SET DATABASE "NEWDB" NORESETLOGS ARCHIVELOGAlso when you are setting a new database, the option should be RESETLOGS and not NORESETLOGS.
'D:\APP\ADMINISTRATOR\ORADATA\NEWDB\ONLINELOG\O1_MF_2_7FK0XKB8_.LOG
D:\APP\ADMINISTRATOR\ORADATA\NEWDB\DATAFILE\O1_MF_SYSTEM_7FK0SKN0_.DBFWhy underscore(_) at the end of the datafile name. Any specific reason ?

Issue in Creation of new Value Field in CO-PA

Hi,
I have a query in CO-PA Value Field Linking.
In my Development Client,
1. Created a New Value Field (No Transport Request Generated)
2. Linked to the above to new Conditon type created in SD. (Tranport request was generated) i.e. in Flow of Actual Values->Transfer of Billing Documents->Assign Value Fields
However then i try creating a new Value Field in my Production Client it throws a message 'You have no authorization to change Fields".
Is this an issue with authorization or i need to transport the Value field too from Development to Production client.
Please Advise.
Thanks in Advance,
Safi

Thanks Phaneendra for the response.
The creation of Value field did not create any tranportation request. Will this too be transported if i transport the Operating Concern.
Please Advise.
Thanks,
Safi

Issue in creation of control cycle

Dear Gurus,
During creation of control cycle (LPK1), the fields for source information is not appearing in my system.
I compared control cycle in a different ECC system where source information is appearing.
How can make the screen appear in my ECC system.
Please find the screenshots.
Any pointers will be highly appreciated.
This thread is further to the threads in Production Planning and LE/WM Forum. I could not resolve the issue with the threads.
Hope that I will get any pointer in EWM forum.
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3609441
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3610822
With Regards,
Malay

Hello Malay,
Can first contact your ABAPer and ensure the bottom screen is not an Screen Enhancement?
If it is a some custom development, your ABAPer can help you on the logic behind it.
Else, Let us know.
Regards,
Sathish

Issue in Creation of XML file from ABAP data

Hi,
I need to create a XML file, but am not facing some issues in creation of XML file, the in the required format.
The required format is
-<Header1 1st field= u201CValueu201D 2nd field= u201CValueu201D>
   - <Header2 1st field= u201CValueu201D 2nd field= u201CValueu201Du2026u2026. Upto 10 fields>
          <Header3 1st field= u201CValueu201D 2nd field= u201CValueu201Du2026u2026. Upto 6 fields/>
          <Header4 1st field= u201CValueu201D 2nd field= u201CValueu201Du2026u2026. Upto 4 fields/.>
           <Header5 1st field= u201CValueu201D 2nd field= u201CValueu201Du2026u2026. Upto 6 fields/>
      </Header2>
   </Header1>
Iu2019m using the call transformation to convert ABAP data to XML file.
So please anybody can help how to define XML structure in transaction XSLT_TOOL.
And one more thing, here I need to put the condition to display the Header 3, Header 4, Header 5 values. If there is no record for a particular line item in header 3, 4 & 5, I donu2019t want to display full line items; this is only for Header 3, 4 & 5.
Please help me in this to get it resolved.

Hello,
you can use CALL TRANSFORMATION id, which will create a exact "print" of the ABAP data into the XML.
If you need to change the structure of XML, you can alter your ABAP structure to match the requirements.
Of course you can create your own XSLT but that is not that easy to describe and nobody will do that for you around here. If you would like to start with XSLT, you´d better start the search.
Regards Otto

What are the mandatory fields while creation of material master in differen

what are the mandatory fields while creation of material master in different views?

Hi Gopi,
This is purely depends on the function configuration, which would be done MM consultants. Kindly check with them.
thanks & regards
Kishore Kumar Maram

BADI for changing fields during Creation of BP in CRM

Hello to everyone,
I need to find a BADI (or other way) to default several fields during BP creation in CRM (4.0 SR1 SP9). The fields I will like to set are TAX TYPE, TAX NUMBER, TAX CATEGORY, etc.. I have found the BADI BUPA_TAX_UPDATE but i dont see any suitable parameters (structures) to changes these fields. Please advice and thanks in advance.

Hi
If you use function BUPA_NUMBERS_GET then your BP number will already be buffered and you can avoid a DB read. It may also be that the BP is not in the DB yet anyway.
You can only pass one GUID in at a time - loop through IT_CHANGED_INSTANCES into a variable of type BU_PARTNER_GUID and pass that into the function as input parameter IV_PARTNER_GUID.
Cheers
Dom

Error in creation of purchase materials/Goods receipt against PO(FI-MM)

Hi All,
While processing FI - MM integration iam facing below errors,request to guide me with same
1) While creation of purchase materials
Valuation class 7920 not allowed for material type Raw material Message no. M3180
Diagnosis
The combination of values you have entered is not defined in the system.
Procedure
Check your entries, and choose a valid value or combination of values with F4.
I have crossed checked in t code OMSK valuation class 7920 exists.
2) Goods receipt against PO:
Number range for trans./event type WE in year 2014 does not exist Message no. M7562
Diagnosis
The number range for document number assignment has not been maintained in the year 2014 for the transaction/event type WE.
Procedure
Contact your system administrator.
in second case i have maintained number ranges in OBA7,OMBT,still iam facing with the same issue
Regards
Santosh

Hi Dev,
Thanks for your reply...yea i have done the ground work before posting this query
but bitt confused with the post i have come across..
Problem was occurring due to the wrong updating of raw material instead of finished goods in MM01 (CREATION OF PURCHASE MM)
however i have over come my 2nd issue,hopefull will over come my 1st issue also
Thanks a lot
Santosh

Reg View creation in Generic

Hi SDN,
Im trying to create Generic Data source of View Method. I wanted to create View on BSID ( Closed Customer Invoices) and BSAD ( Open Customer invoices) Tables, But while creating its giving error as "THERE IS NO RELATION BETWEEN THE TABLES" I want to know how to create Relation Between the tables. Both BSID & BSAD are standard tables, so we cant make any changes.
Please let me know the procedure to bulid Rlation between the tables.
Regards
Sujan

Hi Siva,
You have to give relation between these two tables in tab "Table/Join Conditions".
Creating Views:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_webas620/helpdata/en/cf/21ecf9446011d189700000e8322d00/frameset.htm
View creation fr generic extraction
Hope it Helps

Automatic TO creation and confirmation for a Material document

Hi Dear All,
i am new to MM andWM.
I have to customization for auto transfer orders and confirmations for material documents what ever created with 101 movement type in Inventory Management. I have down configuration like below.
SPRO->Logistics Execution->Warehouse Management->Activities->Transfers-> Set Up Autom. TO Creation for TRs / Posting Change Notices
Double click on control data tab
Hear for my warehouse I given input like   Auto TO = 1,
                                                                         AddId = select check box.
And in Assign control tab for 101 movement type I have given input like below.
Automatic TO = 1.
TO item can be confirmed immed. = tick checkbox
Propose Confirmation = tick checkbox.
Foreground/Backgrnd = D.
After creating of Material document I am executing report RLAUTA10 in SE38.When I execute this report system showing message like TO processing finished: TR total:   17, TO created:    0, Errors:   17.
If I check header details of transfer requirements in LB03, i am not seeing Tick Mark in Auto TO Creation field.
Can any one tell me what the mistake i have down or if i need to do any further configuration. Please help me regarding this concern?
Thanks in Advance..

Dear Steve,
Thanks a lot for giving reply with what I need to do, but I am unable to see result.
I have down configuration like below even though system not processing Auto TO creation. Can you explain me if I have down any mistake below.
Click on Assign button,
Press on New entries
WhN = 900
Reference Movement Type = 101
Movement indicator = B
Movement type for Whse Mgmt = 101
TR create Transfer Requirement = X
Immed.TO Creation
Mail confirmation for background processing = 01.
GR date = 2

Zpool creation in SC 3.2

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for