Defining Time in select query.

hi ,
In BSAK table i dont have time field defined but in my RFC i need to fetch the data based on time and date.
can any one let me know how can i define time field in the existing query ..
i am using the below query.
SELECT lifnr
         xblnr
         bldat
    FROM bsak
    INTO TABLE i_reversal2
     FOR ALL ENTRIES IN i_an_ven
   WHERE lifnr = i_an_ven-lifnr
     AND BUDAT >= date_in
     AND cputm >= time_in
     AND augbl <> ' '.
thanks,

sorry correction below.
SELECT lifnr
         xblnr
         bldat
    FROM bsak
    INTO TABLE i_reversal2
     FOR ALL ENTRIES IN i_an_ven
   WHERE lifnr = i_an_ven-lifnr
     AND BUDAT >= date_in
     AND augbl <> ' '.
thanks,

Similar Messages

BSAD table is taking more time in select query.

Hi ,
The below SELECT query is taking more time , there is no any secondary index is there .
Can anybody suggest how to improve it .
SELECT bukrs
         kunnr
         augdt
         augbl
         gjahr
         belnr
         budat
         bldat
         waers
         xblnr
         BLART
         monat
         shkzg
         gsber
         DMBTR
         WRBTR
         prctr
         FROM BSAD INTO TABLE gt_bsad
         WHERE bukrs = p_bukrs
         AND    kunnr IN so_kunnr
         AND    budat IN so_budat
         AND    xblnr IN so_xblnr
         AND ( blart EQ 'DA' OR
                blart EQ 'DZ' OR
                blart EQ 'ZP' OR               "D03K904574
                blart EQ 'KZ' OR               "D03K904574
                blart EQ 'DP' )
         AND   PRCTR IN R_PC.
Thanks in advance
Regards
chetan

Hi Chetan ,
I will suggest you two things :
1. Try to add Secondary ( Non-unique) index on table BSAD with fields : mandt,bukrs,kunnr,budat,xblnr,blart,prctr.
    but before adding this index test the selectivity of this index by going to Tcode DB05
2. In the select query you have used OR condition for blart. Instead of this try to create a ranges table for blart and append the values 'DA','DZ','ZP','KZ','DP' and use this in the select query. This will improve the performance for sure.
Hope this will help to ypu.
Regards,
Nikhil

Reducing the time for select query

Hi
Please advise why the query is taking too much time to execute when the cost involved in the joins is less.
Here is the explain plan for the same
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 4989 | 984K| | 295K (1)| 00:59:09 |
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 4989 | 984K| 2120K| 295K (1)| 00:59:09 |
|* 2 | FILTER | | | | | | |
|* 3 | HASH JOIN | | 4989 | 984K| | 12975 (1)| 00:02:36 |
|* 4 | HASH JOIN | | 4989 | 862K| | 11943 (1)| 00:02:24 |
| 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | tedy_hf | 993 | 22839 | | 17 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 6 | HASH JOIN | | 4989 | 750K| | 11925 (1)| 00:02:24 |
|* 7 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | tedy_hf453 | 145 | 2465 | | 7 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 8 | HASH JOIN | | 4989 | 667K| | 11917 (1)| 00:02:24 |
|* 9 | INDEX SKIP SCAN | tedy_ehf33 | 4987 | 116K| | 4992 (1)| 00:01:00 |
|* 10 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| tedy_7nl | 43367 | 4785K| | 6925 (1)| 00:01:24 |
| 11 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | tedy_hfeei | 89616 | 2187K| | 1032 (1)| 00:00:13 |
|* 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | tedy_hf455 | 2 | 32 | | 113 (0)| 00:00:02 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Because the cost is internally calculated by the Cost Based Optimizer using the data available when parsing the query (tables, columns, constraints, cardinalities, etc...). If you feed it bad information (stale statistics, not using NOT NULL constraints, check constraints, foreign key constraints, etc..) it chooses inappropriate access methods.
Based on what you've posted, not much help is possible.
When your query takes too long ...
and
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
Will get you started on providing meaningful information with which we can help you.

How to use user defined function in select query using Toplink

Hi Friends
I am little bit of new in Toplink stuff... so please help me...
I have to database functions 1. encrypt and 2. decrypt.
I want to exceute the following sql query using toplink
select port, database, user_name, decrypt(encrypt('String which is to be encrypt ','password'),'password') from CONFIGURATION
can anyone tell me , how to write code in toplink which will give the about sql output.
thanks .....

The "Specifying a Custom SQL String in a DatabaseQuery" section in the TopLink Developer's Guide may help... http://download-uk.oracle.com/docs/cd/B32110_01/web.1013/b28218/qrybas.htm#BCFHDHBG

Select Query in Want unique time.

Please go through below detail
I have one table.
File Id, Date, Time
00001 10/12/2010 10:10
00001 10/12/2010 10:10
00001 10/12/2010 10:10
00001 10/12/2010 10:11
00002 10/12/2010 10:10
00002 10/12/2010 10:10
I want unique fileid,date and time in select query only.
If apply group by File Id, Date, Time then I want increment time +1.
New column
00001 10/12/2010 10:10 10:10
00001 10/12/2010 10:10 10:12 <-- We can not set 10:11 due to it's already exist in table.
00001 10/12/2010 10:10 10:13
00001 10/12/2010 10:11 10:11
In short i would like select fileid,date,time,(Id duplicate entry then time +1 to generate uniquness).
I have do this for myself but i face this problem.
Query to fatch below all duplicate row
time+1
00001 10/12/2010 10:10 10:10
00001 10/12/2010 10:10 10:11 <-- But this enty again become duplicate due to it's already exist in table.
00001 10/12/2010 10:10 10:12
Thanks in advance.

I want time as it is means 23:11 it should not convert to 11:11:00 PMThat has nothing to do with the query.
Just adjust your NLS_DATE_FORMAT:
SQL> alter session set nls_date_format='dd/mm/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM';
Session altered.
SQL> with t as(
2 select '00001' id,to_date('20101012 23:10','yyyymmdd hh24:mi') val from dual union all
3 select '00001', to_date('20101012 23:10','yyyymmdd hh24:mi') from dual union all
4 select '00001', to_date('20101012 23:59','yyyymmdd hh24:mi') from dual union all
5 select '00001', to_date('20101012 23:59','yyyymmdd hh24:mi') from dual union all
6 select '00002', to_date('20101012 10:10','yyyymmdd hh24:mi') from dual union all
7 select '00002', to_date('20101012 10:10','yyyymmdd hh24:mi') from dual)
8 select ID,Val
9 from t
10 model
11 partition by(ID)
12 dimension by(row_number() over(partition by id order by Val) as rn)
13 measures(Val)
14 rules(Val[rn > 1] order by rn
15 = greatest(Val[cv()-1]+interVal '1' minute,
16 Val[cv()]));
ID VAL
00001 12/10/2010 11:10:00 PM
00001 12/10/2010 11:11:00 PM
00001 12/10/2010 11:59:00 PM
00001 13/10/2010 12:00:00 AM
00002 12/10/2010 10:10:00 AM
00002 12/10/2010 10:11:00 AM
6 rows selected.
SQL> alter session set nls_date_format='dd/mm/yyyy hh24:mi';
Session altered.
SQL> with t as(
2 select '00001' id,to_date('20101012 23:10','yyyymmdd hh24:mi') val from dual union all
3 select '00001', to_date('20101012 23:10','yyyymmdd hh24:mi') from dual union all
4 select '00001', to_date('20101012 23:59','yyyymmdd hh24:mi') from dual union all
5 select '00001', to_date('20101012 23:59','yyyymmdd hh24:mi') from dual union all
6 select '00002', to_date('20101012 10:10','yyyymmdd hh24:mi') from dual union all
7 select '00002', to_date('20101012 10:10','yyyymmdd hh24:mi') from dual)
8 select ID,Val
9 from t
10 model
11 partition by(ID)
12 dimension by(row_number() over(partition by id order by Val) as rn)
13 measures(Val)
14 rules(Val[rn > 1] order by rn
15 = greatest(Val[cv()-1]+interVal '1' minute,
16 Val[cv()]));
ID VAL
00001 12/10/2010 23:10
00001 12/10/2010 23:11
00001 12/10/2010 23:59
00001 13/10/2010 00:00
00002 12/10/2010 10:10
00002 12/10/2010 10:11
6 rows selected.

How to improve the performance of one program in one select query

Hi,
I am facing performance issue in one program. I have given some part of the code of the program.
it is taking much time below select query. How to improve the performance.
Quick response is highly appreciated.
Program code
DATA: BEGIN OF t_dels_tvpod OCCURS 100,
vbeln LIKE tvpod-vbeln,
posnr LIKE tvpod-posnr,
lfimg_diff LIKE tvpod-lfimg_diff,
calcu LIKE tvpod-calcu,
podmg LIKE tvpod-podmg,
uecha LIKE lips-uecha,
pstyv LIKE lips-pstyv,
xchar LIKE lips-xchar,
grund LIKE tvpod-grund,
END OF t_dels_tvpod,
DATA: l_tabix LIKE sy-tabix,
lt_dels_tvpod LIKE t_dels_tvpod OCCURS 10 WITH HEADER LINE,
ls_dels_tvpod LIKE t_dels_tvpod.
SELECT vbeln INTO TABLE lt_dels_tvpod FROM likp
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_dels_tvpod
WHERE vbeln = t_dels_tvpod-vbeln
AND erdat IN s_erdat
AND bldat IN s_bldat
AND podat IN s_podat
AND ernam IN s_ernam
AND kunnr IN s_kunnr
AND vkorg IN s_vkorg
AND vstel IN s_vstel
AND lfart NOT IN r_del_types_exclude.
Waiting for quick response.
Best regards,
BDP

Bansidhar,
1) You need to add a check to make sure that internal table t_dels_tvpod (used in the FOR ALL ENTRIES clause) is not blank. If it is blank skip the SELECt statement.
2) Check the performance with and without clause 'AND lfart NOT IN r_del_types_exclude'. Sometimes NOT causes the select statement to not use the index. Instead of 'lfart NOT IN r_del_types_exclude' use 'lfart IN r_del_types_exclude' and build r_del_types_exclude by using r_del_types_exclude-sign = 'E' instead of 'I'.
3) Make sure that the table used in the FOR ALL ENTRIES clause has unique delivery numbers.
Try doing something like this.
TYPES: BEGIN OF ty_del_types_exclude,
         sign(1)   TYPE c,
         option(2) TYPE c,
         low       TYPE likp-lfart,
         high      TYPE likp-lfart,
       END OF ty_del_types_exclude.
DATA: w_del_types_exclude TYPE          ty_del_types_exclude,
      t_del_types_exclude TYPE TABLE OF ty_del_types_exclude,
      t_dels_tvpod_tmp    LIKE TABLE OF t_dels_tvpod        .
IF NOT t_dels_tvpod[] IS INITIAL.
* Assuming that I would like to exclude delivery types 'LP' and 'LPP'
CLEAR w_del_types_exclude.
REFRESH t_del_types_exclude.
w_del_types_exclude-sign = 'E'.
w_del_types_exclude-option = 'EQ'.
w_del_types_exclude-low = 'LP'.
APPEND w_del_types_exclude TO t_del_types_exclude.
w_del_types_exclude-low = 'LPP'.
APPEND w_del_types_exclude TO t_del_types_exclude.
t_dels_tvpod_tmp[] = t_dels_tvpod[].
SORT t_dels_tvpod_tmp BY vbeln.
DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM t_dels_tvpod_tmp
    COMPARING
      vbeln.
SELECT vbeln
    FROM likp
    INTO TABLE lt_dels_tvpod
    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_dels_tvpod_tmp
    WHERE vbeln EQ t_dels_tvpod_tmp-vbeln
    AND erdat IN s_erdat
    AND bldat IN s_bldat
    AND podat IN s_podat
    AND ernam IN s_ernam
    AND kunnr IN s_kunnr
    AND vkorg IN s_vkorg
    AND vstel IN s_vstel
    AND lfart IN t_del_types_exclude.
ENDIF.

Error in select query with package size

Hi Experts,
I have an issue.
SELECT * FROM (w_tab-tablename) I
NTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE <lt_data> PACKAGE SIZE 10000.
Am splitting the table for every 10000 records,for first time the select query is successful.
But when it comes for the second 10000 records,its throwing the following dump.
"DBIF_RSQL_INVALID_CURSOR"
Help Appreciated

Hi,
   There are a few instances where you get this error.
    1) If you are debugging inside select ... endselect.
    2) You have written any of the below statements inside select ... endselect.
Please look at the dump .. you'll find the below ..
MESSAGE (apart from MESSAGE S...)
COMMIT WORK
ROLLBACK WORK
BREAK-POINT
WAIT
CALL FUNCTION ... DESTINATION (synchronous RFC)
CALL FUNCTION ... STARTING NEW TASK
RECEIVE RESULTS
CALL DIALOG
CALL SELECTION-SCREEN
CALL TRANSACTION
CALL SCREEN, or any other statement that results in the display of a
new screen
Regards,
Srini.

Oracle SQL Select query takes long time than expected.

Hi,
I am facing a problem in SQL select query statement. There is a long time taken in select query from the Database.
The query is as follows.
select /*+rule */ f1.id,f1.fdn,p1.attr_name,p1.attr_value from fdnmappingtable f1,parametertable p1 where p1.id = f1.id and ((f1.object_type ='ne_sub_type.780' )) and ( (f1.id in(select id from fdnmappingtable where fdn like '0=#1#/14=#S0058-3#/17=#S0058-3#/18=#1#/780=#5#%')))order by f1.id asc
This query is taking more than 4 seconds to get the results in a system where the DB is running for more than 1 month.
The same query is taking very few milliseconds (50-100ms) in a system where the DB is freshly installed and the data in the tables are same in both the systems.
Kindly advice what is going wrong??
Regards,
Purushotham

SQL> @/alcatel/omc1/data/query.sql
2 ;
9 rows selected.
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 3745571015
| Id | Operation | Name |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | |
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS | |
| 3 | NESTED LOOPS | |
| 4 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | PARAMETERTABLE |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| FDNMAPPINGTABLE |
|* 6 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PRIMARY_KY_FDNMAPPINGTABLE |
|* 7 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | FDNMAPPINGTABLE |
|* 8 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PRIMARY_KY_FDNMAPPINGTABLE |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
5 - filter("F1"."OBJECT_TYPE"='ne_sub_type.780')
6 - access("P1"."ID"="F1"."ID")
7 - filter("FDN" LIKE '0=#1#/14=#S0058-3#/17=#S0058-3#/18=#1#/780=#5#
8 - access("F1"."ID"="ID")
Note
- rule based optimizer used (consider using cbo)
Statistics
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
0 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
0 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
0 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
0 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
9 rows processed
SQL>

Select query taking too much time to fetch data from pool table a005

Dear all,
I am using 2 pool table a005 and a006 in my program. I am using select query to fetch data from these table. i.e. example is mentioned below.
select * from a005 into table t_a005 for all entries in it_itab
                   where vkorg in s_vkorg
                   and     matnr in s_matnr
                   and     aplp   in s_aplp
                   and     kmunh = it_itab-kmunh.
here i can't create index also as tables are pool table...If there is any solutions , than please help me for same..
Thanks ,

it would be helpful to know what other fields are in the internal table you are using for the FOR ALL ENTRIES.
In general, you should code the order of your fields in the select in the same order as they appear in the database. If you do not have the top key field, then the entire database is read. If it's large then it's going to take a lot of time. The more key fields from the beginning of the structure that you can supply at faster the retrieval.
Regards,
Brent

Time Taking while firing a select Query

i am unable to access the table "X" in ABC schema
its taking toooooooooo much time while firing just a select query
how to resolve it
"SELECT digital_signing_cert
FROM X"

could be due to huge table size,crosscheck this from user_segments view.
select bytes/1024/1024 "MB" from user_segments where segment_name='X';
also check database alert log for any error.

TIME-OUT error in BSAK select query(Progress Indicator is also used)

Hi,
    In my report program one select query is there on BSAK table, which is as follows --
       SELECT BUKRS
                     BELNR
                    GJAHR
                    SHKZG
                    BSCHL
                    UMSKZ
                    LIFNR
                    EBELN
                    EBELP
                    WRBTR
                    DMBTR
                    XZAHL
                    REBZG
                   AUGBL
                   BLART
                   AUFNR
                   AUGDT
                   BUZEI FROM BSAK
                              INTO TABLE IT_BSAK
                              FOR ALL ENTRIES IN IT_BKPF1
                               WHERE BUKRS = IT_BKPF1-BUKRS
                                            AND AUGDT = IT_BKPF1-BUDAT
                                            AND AUGBL = IT_BKPF1-BELNR
                                            AND BSCHL IN ('31' , '29', '26', '39', '25').
I used Progress Indicator befor running this query and after this query also. But still It's giving me TIME-OUT error in this select query only.
I run the same query for 10 records in IT_BKPF1 table, it runs perfectly. But when I run it for 1000 records it giving dump.
And in actual bussiness my records are always more than 100 only.
I also check the indexing. It having secondary indexing on this BUKRS, AUGDT, AUGBL fields. Then also it's giving error.
so, How can I solve this dump..?? What could be the reason..??
Thanks in advance...!!
Regards,
Poonam.

Hi Poonam Patil,
Try to provide BELNR and GJAHR in where condition...
BKPF-DBBLG ==> BSAK-BELNR
Also check
BKPF-BLDAT ==> BSAK-AUGDT
Check out above relation...
If data is there in these fields of the table and both are matching then you can pass it and as they are in primary key of BSAK it will improve the performance...
Hope it will solve your problem..
Thanks & Regards
ilesh 24x7
ilesh Nandaniya

Select query taking more time..

Hi friends..
The below inner join statement is taking more time , can any body sugget me to improve the performance . I tried FOR ALL ENTRIES also but that also taking more time than inner join statement .
SELECT a~vbeln from vbap as a inner join vakpa as b
      on avbeln = bvbeln
      into corresponding fields of table IT_VAKPA
      where a~WERKS IN S_IWERKS
      and a~pstyv NE 'ZRS'
      and b~vkorg = IVKORG
      and b~audat IN IAUDAT
      and b~vtweg IN IVTWEG.
Regards
Chetan

Hi Chetan ,
VAKPA is an index table. From the select query , it has been observed that you are not fetching any data from VAKPA. Only you have added some selection paramenters in where clause of select query.
My suggestion will be instead of using VAKPA in inner join you use VBAK along with VBAP. All the fields that you are using as selection condition from VAKPA are there in VBAK.
I am sure performance of query will be improved.
If still duo to business logic you need to use VAKPA, try to create secondary non unique index on fields VKORD,AUDATand VTWEG on table VAKPA.
However I will recommend you to go for first option only. If this does not work then go for second option.
Hopfully this will help you.
Regards,
Nikhil

Select Query taking long time to run second time

Hi All,
I have Oracle 11gR1 in windows server 2008 R2 .
I have some tables with 10 million records . When i run the select query for those tables first time it gives me result in 15 seconds but if i am running the same script second time from the same session I am getting the result in 15 minutes to complete ..
Why it is happening? What may be the solution for this ?
Thanks & Regards,
Vikash jain(Junior DBA)

Hi Mohamed,
I just saw that both the times for the same query execution plan is different ..
here are the details :
First time Second Time
g84m3qqjv2p3q g84m3qqjv2p3q
2733045235 1310485984
So plz tell me how should i force database to use the first execution plan ?
I got this script for forcing the Db to use the same execution plan
accept sql_id -
prompt 'Enter value for sql_id: ' -
default 'X0X0X0X0'
accept plan_hash_value -
prompt 'Enter value for plan_hash_value: ' -
default 'X0X0X0X0'
accept fixed -
prompt 'Enter value for fixed (NO): ' -
default 'NO'
accept enabled -
prompt 'Enter value for enabled (YES): ' -
default 'YES'
accept plan_name -
prompt 'Enter value for plan_name (ID_sqlid_planhashvalue): ' -
default 'X0X0X0X0'
set feedback off
set sqlblanklines on
set serveroutput on
declare
l_plan_name varchar2(40);
l_old_plan_name varchar2(40);
l_sql_handle varchar2(40);
ret binary_integer;
l_sql_id varchar2(13);
l_plan_hash_value number;
l_fixed varchar2(3);
l_enabled varchar2(3);
major_release varchar2(3);
minor_release varchar2(3);
begin
select regexp_replace(version,'\..*'), regexp_substr(version,'[0-9]+',1,2) into major_release, minor_release from v$instance;
minor_release := 2;
l_sql_id := '&&sql_id';
l_plan_hash_value := to_number('&&plan_hash_value');
l_fixed := '&&fixed';
l_enabled := '&&enabled';
ret := dbms_spm.load_plans_from_cursor_cache(
sql_id=>l_sql_id,
plan_hash_value=>l_plan_hash_value,
fixed=>l_fixed,
enabled=>l_enabled);
if minor_release = '1' then
-- 11gR1 has a bug that prevents renaming Baselines
dbms_output.put_line(' ');
dbms_output.put_line('Baseline created.');
dbms_output.put_line(' ');
else
-- This statements looks for Baselines create in the last 4 seconds
select sql_handle, plan_name,
decode('&&plan_name','X0X0X0X0','SQLID_'||'&&sql_id'||'_'||'&&plan_hash_value','&&plan_name')
into l_sql_handle, l_old_plan_name, l_plan_name
from dba_sql_plan_baselines spb
where created > sysdate-(1/24/60/15);
ret := dbms_spm.alter_sql_plan_baseline(
sql_handle=>l_sql_handle,
plan_name=>l_old_plan_name,
attribute_name=>'PLAN_NAME',
attribute_value=>l_plan_name);
dbms_output.put_line(' ');
dbms_output.put_line('Baseline '||upper(l_plan_name)||' created.');
dbms_output.put_line(' ');
end if;
end;
undef sql_id
undef plan_hash_value
undef plan_name
undef fixed
set feedback on
Output:
Enter value for sql_id: g84m3qqjv2p3q
Enter value for plan_hash_value: 2733045235
Enter value for fixed (NO):
Enter value for enabled (YES):
Enter value for plan_name (ID_sqlid_planhashvalue): g84m3qqjv2p3q
old 16: l_sql_id := '&&sql_id';
new 16: l_sql_id := 'g84m3qqjv2p3q';
old 17: l_plan_hash_value := to_number('&&plan_hash_value');
new 17: l_plan_hash_value := to_number('2733045235');
old 18: l_fixed := '&&fixed';
new 18: l_fixed := 'NO';
old 19: l_enabled := '&&enabled';
new 19: l_enabled := 'YES';
old 40: decode('&&plan_name','X0X0X0X0','SQLID_'||'&&sql_id'||'_'||'&&plan_hash_value','&&plan_name')
new 40: decode('g84m3qqjv2p3q','X0X0X0X0','SQLID_'||'g84m3qqjv2p3q'||'_'||'2733045235','g84m3qqjv2p3q')
declare
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01403: no data found
ORA-06512: at line 39
Kindly help me to resolve the issue ..
Thanks & Regards,
Vikash Jain(Junior DBA)

Select query take long time

Hi All.
When i execute select query from View it takes about 00:00:45:12 sec to pull the data , but when i execute same query in some other system(different database with same table structure) it takes about 00:00:02:05 sec.
1)I have tried by dropped and recreated the index then i tried by exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats procedure still no luck.
Please help me to understand the reason difference in response time
Thanks
sankar

did you run the EXPLAIN PLAN?

Select query takes long time....

Hi Experts,
I am using a select query in which inspection lot is in another table and order no. is in another table. this select query taking very long time, what is the problem in this query ? Pl. guide us.
select bPRUEFLOS bMBLNR bCPUDT aAUFNR amatnr aLGORT a~bwart
amenge aummat asgtxt axauto
into corresponding fields of table itab
*into table itab
from mseg as a inner join qamb as b
on amblnr = bmblnr
and azeile = bzeile
where b~PRUEFLOS in insp
and b~cpudt in date1
and b~typ = '3'
and a~bwart = '321'
and a~aufnr in aufnr1.
Yusuf

hi
instead of using 'move to corresponding of itab' fields use 'into table itab'.....
coz......if u use move to corresponding it will search for all the appropriate fields then it will place u r data........instead of that declare apprpiate internal table and use 'into table itab'.
and one more thing dont use joins ......coz joins will decrease u r performance .....so instead of that use 'for all entries' ....and mention all the key fields in where condition ........
ok
reward points for helpful answers

Defining Time in select query.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for