Strange situation...for user sessions

Hi All,
I have a situation where when the user executes a report in RRMX and when he is done that he closes the Session by disconnecting the server connection in the BEx toolbar.
Even the user closes the session and he is out of the system but he still appears in SM04.
I don't undersatnd why this is happening?
This is happening only for a particular user.
Can I click on the session in SM04 and end it?
Is that ok?
Thanks,
Ram

may be GUI haveing problem ,better install GUI
even user close the session its showing then
you can close the session useing the SM04

Similar Messages

Daily report for user sessions in oracle10g database

I would like to genarate the daily report for user sessions in oracle10g database
daily report of how many of sessions present in oracle database for each user

Thanks for link ( I know you always post the oracle document link here)
But I am expecting scripts( someting like logon trigger and logg off trigger) to genarate the user session report.

Timeout for user session/connection

Hi All,
We have 81741 database acessed by windowNT/2000 users connecting via formswebserver(6.0.8.21.1) using JInitiator 1.1.8.19, we use Apache server and/or webDb listener on webserver. Users are assigned different roles like engineer, technician, manager etc. As per management request, we need to timeout and close ENGINEERs connection which is idle for more than 60 min. Now, we need to kill the database session, kill the process on webserver and kill the application screen user has on his PC. I am sure, this has been implemented by some of our OTN members.
Any suggestions would be appreciated in this regard.
Thanks & Regards.

You could try polling with in.available() for 5 seconds. As long as it returns 0, there is nothing to read.
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
while (in.available() == 0 && System.currentTimeMillis()-start < 5000) {
Thread.yield();
// now the 5000 milliseconds has expired OR there is input available:
String s;
if (in.available()) {
s = in.readLine();
System.out.println(s);
// there might be more to read, so you can check with in.available() again until you have read everything..
} else {
System.out.println("timeout");
}

Strange Situation for PO modification

Hi,
I have come across a very interesting case.
A PR is processed and PO is created against that PR. But in Quantities tab, Ordered QTY is 0. Open Qty is same as PR qty.
Also, in Status tab, it shows PO & RFQs for that PR.
On analysing I found that in PO while creaing, user mentioned wrong PR No. (other than PR series I mean ABCD, 2134, like that)
in delivery schedule tab in PO. Due to this, it did not update PR Ordered Qty in PR. Also status was not updated and it did not show PO in status.
But after few days, user corrected PR No. in ME22N for that PO No. by putting correct PR No. Now after this PO gets displayed in PR Status tab. But Ordered Qty still remains 0. So, PR remains OPEN.
Why is this happening ? Is there any solution ?
Reply soon.
Thanks.
Regards,
Vishram

Dear Chandrashekhar,
Thanks for your reply. It seems it will work.
But by this time user had updated "PR Closed" indicator for the PR. So now it does not show as open.
Anyways, in future this will be very helpful.
Thanks.
Regards,
Vishram

Re: User Session using ServletSession and Stateful EJB in Cluster

          Sorry , I didn't use WLS 6.0, we use wls 5.1 in production.
          But in Wls 6.0, in some situations , the state of the stateful session bean can be lost. So it's not so reliable. You have to deal with it in the client code. Instead, servlet is a reliable solution.
          In order to test under wls6.0, you can store the handle of the EJBObject in the HttpSession, not in jndi, cos if the instance fails, all its objects will be removed by remaining instances from jndi. In another instance, you get the handle, and try to get the EJBObject.
          In wls5.1, some information like the server url must be embeded inside the handle. But in wls6.0, I don't know how they deal with it.
          I am looking forward to your results
          "Anuj Soni" <[email protected]> wrote:
          >
          >What kind of clustering problems you had with WL6.0 for Stateful session beans ? It will be helpful for me to know before hand.
          >
          >BTW, how were you able to test stateful session beans in a cluster under WL6.0 i.e. were you storing the Handle or EJBObject in HttpSession or did you store it in JNDI ?
          >
          >Thanks,
          >
          >Anuj
          >"Tao Zhang" <[email protected]> wrote:
          >>Although it's very advanced to take advantage of both http session and
          >>stateful session bean replication, but if you rely on the stateful session
          >>bean's state, you will be in trouble. Because the support of stateful
          >>session bean's replication is not perfect in wls6.0. We already chaned
          >>almost all stateful session beans into servlets or entity beans.
          >>
          >>I am not sure about the handle of the EJBObject. I think it should be able
          >>to reconstruct for us otherwise we can't use the handle any more.
          >>
          >>You can do a test. BTW, could you tell me the result?
          >>
          >>Thanks.
          >>
          >>Anuj Soni <[email protected]> wrote in message
          >>news:[email protected]...
          >>>
          >>> Hi,
          >>>
          >>> I am designing the workflow for my web application using a Stateful
          >>session bean. As Weblogic 6.0 supports clustering of stateful session bean
          >>and HttpSession(in-memory replication), I want to use the combination of
          >>both techniques to provide load-balancing and fail-over safety for user
          >>sessions and their corresponding workflows.
          >>>
          >>> The question I have is that, Is Handle obtained using
          >>EJBObject.getHandle(), fail-over safe (for a clusterable stateful bean), so
          >>that I can reconstruct the reference to EJBObject on the secondary server
          >>incase of primary server crash.
          >>>
          >>> My understanding is that I should store Handle in the HttpSession as it is
          >>Serializable not the EJBObject. The weblogic 6.0 document only talks about
          >>the replica-awareness of EJBObject.
          >>>
          >>> If my above assumption is incorrect, Can you tell me how else I can
          >>achieve my goal ?
          >>>
          >>> Thanks in advance.
          >>>
          >>> Anuj Soni
          >>
          >>
          >


Any one tested this scenario yet? i.e: storing the handle to an EJB object and then trying to re-use after the HttpSession is restored?
          Thanks.

Logical Locking for User and Session ID possible?

Hi colleagues!
We are developing on NetWeaver CE 7.10 SP6
Currently it is possible for a user to access the same business object (like a specific order number for example) in two separate browser tabs in parallel. This leads to many strange and unwanted side-effects.
One option would be to use a non cumulative exclusive locking. However we would like to avoid that as we use the lock life time "user session". And in this case we would need to set the lock only at one place and could not assure the setting of the lock again at different places (lock() may only be called once in this case).
It would be nice if the com.sap.engine.services.applocking.LogicalLocking class would support support a session based exclusive locking where the same lock can be applied multiple times but only for the same session. But this does not seem to be possible.
Does anybody know a nice solution for this issue? How to avoid that the same user opens the same business object in multiple sessions? Ideally this should be callable from a CAF application service.
Thanks and kind regards,
Gunnar
Edited by: Gunnar Goerke on Jul 6, 2009 4:07 PM
Edited by: Gunnar Goerke on Jul 6, 2009 4:09 PM

For analyze, we have synchronized 15 LDAP Users to Notes
FirstName, Lastname and login attributes are from 1 to 15 characters lenght as following :
givenname, lastname, UID
1,1,1
F2,L2,ID
F33,L33,ID3
F444,L444,ID44
F5555,L5555,ID555
F66666,L66666,ID6666
F777777,L777777,ID77777
F8888888,L8888888,ID888888
F99999999,L99999999,ID9999999
Faaaaaaaaa,Laaaaaaaaa,IDaaaaaaaa
Fbbbbbbbbbb,Lbbbbbbbbbb,IDbbbbbbbbb
Fccccccccccc,Lccccccccccc,IDcccccccccc
Fdddddddddddd,Ldddddddddddd,IDddddddddddd
Feeeeeeeeeeeee,Leeeeeeeeeeeee,IDeeeeeeeeeeee
Fffffffffffffff,Lffffffffffffff,IDfffffffffffff
Between 6 and 8 characters, le logical Name of the user is correct
He is constructed as %fistname% %lastname%/DOMAIN
Less than 6 or more than 8 characters, the logical name is not correct
We can show the partial path of the lotus's data directory.
I can send screenshot to an email Adress if you want
Why this ? It's not usable
PS : All certificates can be viewed without provide password !
Why the LDAP password of the user's entry is not used to open the ID ?
Thanks for your help.
BRs
Vincent

How do I allow my users to set the option to save a new timezone for future sessions?

The option to save a newly selected timezone for future sessions has been greyed-out
in the Calendar Client. How can I allow my users to choose this option?
<P>
This is controlled by the settimezone setting on the Calendar Server. By
default, it is set to FALSE. You can change the value to TRUE in the
unison.ini settings. The
Calendar Server must be restarted for the change to take effect.

Hi,
Based my research, OOB SharePoint don’t allow anonymous users to contribute contents(Edit, Upload and Add) into list and library.
This is by design behavior, and it’s a consideration about security in order to help protect your site from potential script injection attacks.
For anonymous users, only the View Item permission is available for libraries.
If you want to know more about this, please refer to
http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-sharepoint-services-help/enable-anonymous-access-HA010113018.aspx
Hope this helps
Thanks!
Stanfford

COREid Federation Error: A local user session could not be created for the

Hi,
I installed two instances of COREid Federation in my machine. Also installed SiteMinder and LDAP. Source Domain of COREid (8101) uses LDAP as IdMBridge and Destination Domain (9101) uses SiteMinder as IdMBridge. I am trying to access the resource protected by the SiteMinder from the source domain using the URL which is constructed using the pattern given in the PDF:
http://mymachine.domain.com:8101/shareid/saml/ObSAMLTransferService?DOMAIN=DestinationDomain&method=POST&TARGET=http://mymachine.domain.com:8887/Source/Source.html
Assertions are generated and I can see the assertion in the Source domain and transferred to the Destination Domain.
I get the following error in the Destination Domain Shareid Log file:
ERROR - [http10113-Processor3] - RECEIVER: ERROR: A local user session could not be created for the assertion
Please help me to solve this issue?
Note: The Web agent runs on the web server instance 8887.
SiteMinder is able to protect the resource when accessed.

Typically that error occurs when the destinations access management system can't find the user based on the SAML attribute. Check to make sure that the attribute that you are matching on matches exactly.

SHAREid - A local user session could not be created for the assertion

Problem: We have a client trying to federate to our environment using POST profile but we are getting the following error, "RECEIVER: ERROR: A local user session could not be created for the assertion".
I verified that the user exist in the directory and I am able to execute a test successfully as that user.
Thanks.

There is a requirement that the client needs to send an attribute called "traveler" in the assertion. We found out that the problem occurs only when client sends a attribute in the assertion. When the assertion does not include the attribute, there is no issue. Not sure why that is the case as we have other clients sending the same attribute in the assertion.
Here is the AttributeStatement.
<saml:AttributeStatement xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><saml:Subject><saml:NameIdentifier Format="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.1:nameid-format:unspecified">XXXXXX</saml:NameIdentifier></saml:Subject><saml:Attribute AttributeName="XXXID" AttributeNamespace="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/claims"><saml:AttributeValue>XXXXX</saml:AttributeValue></saml:Attribute></saml:AttributeStatement>
It does not have <saml:SubjectConfirmation> and <ConfirmationMethod> element. Can that be a problem?
Thanks,
Vinay
Edited by: user504421 on Jul 9, 2009 2:17 PM

What would cause adobe connect to freeze in a session for users, while the moderator session did not

what would cause adobe connect to freeze in a session for users, while the moderator session did not

HI rogerstam1
Is screen being shared at that time when addin freezes?
if yes if this coems again could you just stop screen share and try it again.
hope this helps.

Implementing max user sessions settings for TACACS with ACS 5.3

I'm a little confused about the configuration of max user sessions for device administration with TACACS.
When I've changed the configutration of unlimited sessions for a value in Access Policies > Max User Session Policy > Max Session User Settings
I think this value could limit the maximum number of sessions for each user, but instead this value limit in a global meaning all of my sessions.
For example: I need to limit the session for my users in 2.
user1 = Max 2 sessions
user2 = Max 2 sessions
user3 = Max 2 sessions
Whe i Put the value of 2 in Max Session User Settings
user1 + user2 + user3 = Max 2 sessions
This is a limitation of ACS 5.3 or my configuration needs something aditional.

Luis,
Are you saying that when you authenticate with user1 and user 2 that user3 isnt able to get access?
Do you have tacacs accounting enabled on the network access device?
Also what do you have configured for the group settings? If there is a maximum group setting and all the users are a member of the same group then the lesser of the two will be enforced. So if the group max sessions is set to 1 then the all users in that group will have a max session of 1.
Here is some reference material.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/net_mgmt/cisco_secure_access_control_system/5.3/user/guide/access_policies.html#wp1162177
Thanks,
Tarik Admani

Re: (forte-users) Session management for page builder(fwd)

Jaco,
Hope this helps,
John
John Soper, Information Systems Development, ITS, The University of Melbourne
email: j.soperits.unimelb.edu.au >>>> Tel: 9344 5612---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 16:34:31 +1100
From: Lyle Winton <L.Wintonits.unimelb.edu.au>
To: John Soper <j.soperits.unimelb.edu.au>
Subject: Re: (forte-users) Session management for page builder (fwd)
Why not construct an intermediate page after the
login page that has SESSION_UNSPECIFIED and
a refresh META tag. The page can then refresh
to either the login failed or login succeeded pages
depending on how the login went! Looks like...
1) Login page (SESSION_UNSPECIFIED)
2A) Refresh page (SESSION_UNSPECIFIED)
< HTML >
< HEAD >
< META http-equiv="refresh"
content="0;URL=<a href=
"http://www.blah.com/forte.cgi?PageName=3">http://www.blah.com/forte.cgi?PageName=3</a>" >
< /HEAD >
< BODY >
Login succeeded. Please wait...
< /BODY >
< /HTML >
2B) Refresh page (SESSION_UNSPECIFIED)
< HTML >
< BODY >
Login failed.
< /BODY >
< /HTML >
3) We're finally in. (SESSION_REQUIRED)
I'm not sure if this works on internet exploder.
Lyle.
John Soper wrote:
Lyle,
(Post from forte mailing group)
Does this make sense to you?
John
John Soper, Information Systems Development, ITS, The University of Melbourne
email: j.soperits.unimelb.edu.au >>>> Tel: 9344 5612---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 07:54:24 +0200
From: "Jaco Erasmus (home)" <jacoerasmweb.co.za>
To: kamranaminyahoo.com
Subject: (forte-users) Session management for page builder
Hi everybody,
We have a lot of legacy code making use of the page builder service to
produce web pages. These pages were originally written without session
management. I'm now busy adding session management to them, but there is
one problem with this approach and I will appreciate if someone can shed
some light on it. Here it is:
Page one is submitted.
Some validation (authentication) takes place and depending on the outcome,
either page 2A (SESSION_REQUIRED) or 2B (error page with
SESSION_UNSPECIFIED) must be displayed. In order to implement this, I
needed a place to make a decision. The way I've done it, is to pass a
'virtual page' (SESSION_UNSPECIFIED) to the page builder service. The
validation is done here and request.PageName is then replaced with the
PageName of pages 2A or 2B. The HandleRequest() method is then called
again. The problem is that the ValidateSession() method does not get
invoked again, thus allowing 2A through without a session. How do I make
sure that the ValidateSession() method get invoked again?
The approach making use of templates look to me as if it has all the means
to do this (redirect tag), but I don't want to rewrite everything if I
don't have to. Is there a way that a pagebuilder page can be specified by
the redirect tag? This will definitely help, but so far I've only managed
to call templates from the redirect tag.
Is the template approach better suited for session management? It is
definetely better documented...
Regards.
Jaco
For the archives, go to: http://lists.sageit.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.sageit.com

Hi,
i hope this helps
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/7e/aa610cc1dd8f4388b1df02fc362f0f/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/69/c250754ba111d189750000e8322d00/frameset.htm
regards,
Anil.

Locks list for a user session

Hello,
Is there a function module or class/method which will give me the list of all locks of a user in the current session and not across all sessions (like transaction SM12). Function modules like ENQUE_READ and ENQUE_READ2 provides the lock list for a user across all sessions but not in the seesion in which the FM is being executed.
Please let me know if you have any information in this regard.
Thanks & Regards,
Saurabh

Hi saurabh,
Dont post duplicate thread . Its against the rule of engagement.
Locks list for a user session
If you have got the answer in the previous thraed then close this thread.
Regards,
Sujit

DRM-61026: Unable to create user session for the following reason: Login failed. Invalid user name or password.

All Im very new to Oracle DRM and Im trying to get the app setup on Windows server running SQL Server 2008. When I try to login to the Web Client I keep getting this error.
DRM-61026: Unable to create user session for the following reason: Login failed. Invalid user name or password.
Can you please help

This might be due to The 'Oracle Instance' path may not have been set to a path relative to the 'CSS Bridge Host' (i.e. the Foundation Services machine) on the Configuration > Host Machines > CSS > General tab of the DRM Configuration Utility.
if this is the case then
1. Open the DRM Configuration Console.
2. Go to the Configuration > Host Machines > CSS > General tab of the DRM Configuration Utility.
3. Ensure that the path in 'Oracle Instance' has been set relative to the 'CSS Bridge Host' (i.e. the Foundation Services machine defined in 'CSS Bridge Host').
4. If corrections are made to 'Oracle Instance' then restart the DRM services to pick up the change.
Thanks,
~KKT~

IdM Anonymous user sessions for password resets

I am currently working on an update to a self service password reset customization through the IdM anonymous user interface. I am having issues with SIM not closing the anonymous sessions, once a user attempts an anonymous reset. Anytime one of the idm/user/anon****.jsp pages are accessed SIM logs in as the "Reset" user, so then any user that tries to go back to update their challenge questions, gets "...view acess denied to subject Reset...", as if SIM doesn't relize they are back in their user session. Question:
1. If I use any anon***.jsp pages for any process/workflow launches, for self service, must I handle the logoff of that anonymous session? Currently it looks like a custom logoff and redirect is working, but I was wondering if this is the preferred way to approach this?

Yes, solved a long time ago but yes, I did find a fix for this. Turns out we had multiple issues but did work through them.
First, make sure the LDAP user is NOT Directory Manager or Admin or ANY other ID used for multiple purposes such as a privileged user that also makes changes via other tools. I created a new user in LDAP only for IDM purposes and give it the permissions needed: uid=idmsync,..... The permissions we gave were in essence the same as Directory manager as IDM is used in our case to manage LDAP as well.
Then add in the listening resource to exclude any changes from the uid=idmsync user.
In the changelog stream then all changes by IDM come down as idmsync. But other changes will come through as directory manager or someone else. But by filtering idmsync changes you prevent an infinite loop. eg. IDM sets LDAP generates change to IDM sets LDAP generates change to IDM... However other user changes will be processed without the infinite looping.
From an efficiency perspective, we also spent time refining the active sync forms. But all worked well by production turnover, which was well over a year ago.

Strange situation...for user sessions

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for