The Question about stock transfer between HU-Management and WM-Management

Hi,
There is a scenario about stock transfer between HU-Management and WM-Management storage location. I use transaction MB1B , movement type 313 , 315. After Good issue from WM-management storage location, outbound delivery will genarated, then Pack, Create/Confirm TO, at last post goods issue for the outboud delivery. But when i do movement type 315, there is a warning message "Data of preceding document was not transmitted", and from the F1 help i find this system reponse "You can maintain an indicator that makes information about preceding documents in this delivery available under delivery type in Customizing. For some characteristics of this indicator, the type of preceding document and the related document and item numbers must be transmitted to delivery creation. At least one of these parameters is missing.".
So, My questions are:
1. Generallily, Outbound delivery is created by SO, inbound delivery is created referenc PO, but how the stock transfer for 2 steps generate the outbould delivery and inbound delivery? Could you pls tell me the where i can config this in the IMG?
2. What's "Data of preceding document was not transmitted" mean ? how to fix this issue ?
Best Regards
Boxer Du
I am the SAP fans, focus on MM and WM. I am interesting TRM Yard Management and Cross Docking now.Very Gladly to talk you about these areas. I want to exchange the knowledge with you, and want to be a good friend of you. Pls contact me. You can find My MSN in the profile. Thanks.

Hi,
Sure, The inbound delivery type is set up in the IMG->Logistics General -> HU management -> Basics ->Delivery type -> Delivery type determination.
For Inbound delivery type 'HID' is maintained in this view.
Best Regards.
Some One want to discuss the details , can contact me. Thanks.

Similar Messages

Stock transfer between Excise Plant and Non Excise Plant

Scenario : Stock is imported from say Singapore. One of the import duties can be claimed back as CVD and pass the benefit to customer.
Requirement : Stock transfer between Excise Plant and Non Excise Plant
Question : i) If I do stock transfer from Excise plant to non-excise plant, can I transfer the CVD amount which I captured in RG23A - Part1/Part 2?
ii) If I do stock transfer from Non- Excise plant to Excise plant, can I get the benefit of CVD and pass on that benefit to customer?
Pls let me know the possiblity of above two in SAP and Legally?
thanks in advance
Sridevi

Ok! Thanks for the replies. Pls let me allow to elaborate the earlier requirement.
Trading Goods say A gets imported to India. Issue was :
1) We need to issue Excise invoice only to few customers. So, we thought of treating one batch as excise batch and remaining as non excise batch per day.
2) Stock price varies every day being batch wise produced in say Singapore.
Means Mateiral is A but price varies evey day and because of the duty payment also gets varied. For a single material master we do have different prices for each batch and also excise/non excise scenario. So, how can I get material value for each of this combinations in the system and how to identify the same.
Because of the above reasons, we thought of having two plants. I can not configure depot here because cleint requires single plant for each state as of now.
Am I clear? If not, pls let me know,
regards
Sridevi

Question About Sharing Apps Between My iPhone and My Wife's iPhone

Hi, I have a question about downloading apps to my iPhone.
I ordered two iPhone 3g's - one for my wife and one for me, and I've discovered that when I download an app (even free ones) on my iPhone and then later sync it to iTunes, my wife cannot put it on her phone. However if I download it on iTunes on my computer and later sync it to my phone, then my wife is able to sync it to her phone as well. It's no big deal when they are free because she can just go get it if she wants it. I haven't purchased any apps yet, but is there a way to be able to give my wife apps that I purchase on my iPhone? Or do I need to purchase all of my [pay] apps and songs on iTunes on my computer to ensure we both have access? Or do I have it all wrong completely LOL?? This rights management stuff is confusing.
Thanks in advance for your help,
Jimmy

I had my iTunes account and phone before I got my wife's hers. When I first started, I synced hers from her account on my computer brought in my libraries and authorized her phone as one of the 5 allowed. She had all purchased apps and music. Over time we each bought music or apps on our seperate accouts. Of course, we told each other about cool apps or music we bought and wanted on our phone. When I went to sync iTunes was going to delete all music and apps and sync with the library I was logged into. Didn't want that, only work around I have found is to copy new music or new apps from one library to the other. Updating on the phone is also difficult because you can't switch between accounts so updates have to be done at the computer for apps bought under different accounts. I am sure there is a better way to do this and ask for an insight anyone would have. I hope it works out.
Message was edited by: AfoUare for typos

Stock transfer between storage locations and lead time

Hello,
We use stock transfer orders between different storage locations. Is it possible to maintain the transport lead time between storage locations somewhere or do in need to use routes and scheduling?
rgsd
GAR

Hi,
Try using movement type 313 and 315
313 -- Transfer posting SL to SL --- Remove from issuing SL
315 -- Transfer posting SL to SL -- Placing in Receiving SL
Regards

Question about main difference between Java bean and Java class in JSP

Hi All,
I am new to Java Bean and wonder what is the main difference to use a Bean or an Object in the jsp. I have search on the forum and find some post also asking the question but still answer my doubt. Indeed, what is the real advantage of using bean in jsp.
Let me give an example to illustrate my question:
<code>
<%@ page errorPage="errorpage.jsp" %>
<%@ page import="ShoppingCart" %>

<jsp:useBean id="cart" scope="session" class="ShoppingCart" />
<html>
<head><title>Shopping Cart</title></head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Your cart's ID is: <%=cart.getId()%>.
</body>
<html>
</code>
In the above code, I can also create a object of ShoppingCart by new operator then get the id at the following way.
<code>
<%
ShoppingCart cart = new ShoppingCart();
out.println(cart.getId());
%>
</code>
Now my question is what is the difference between the two method? As in my mind, a normal class can also have it setter and getter methods for its properties. But someone may say that, there is a scope="session", which can be declared in an normal object. It may be a point but it can be easily solved but putting the object in session by "session.setAttribute("cart", cart)".
I have been searching on this issue on the internet for a long time and most of them just say someting like "persistance of state", "bean follow some conventions of naming", "bean must implement ser" and so on. All of above can be solved by other means, for example, a normal class can also follow the convention. I am really get confused with it, and really want to know what is the main point(s) of using the java bean.
Any help will be highly apprecaited. Thanks!!!
Best Regards,
Alex

Hi All,
I am new to Java Bean and wonder what is the main
difference to use a Bean or an Object in the jsp. The first thing to realize is that JavaBeans are just Plain Old Java Objects (POJOs) that follow a specific set of semantics (get/set methods, etc...). So what is the difference between a Bean and an Object? Nothing.
<jsp:useBean id="cart" scope="session" class="ShoppingCart" />
In the above code, I can also create a object of
ShoppingCart by new operator then get the id at the
following way.
ShoppingCart cart = new ShoppingCart();
out.println(cart.getId());
...Sure you could. And if the Cart was in a package (it has to be) you also need to put an import statement in. Oh, and to make sure the object is accessable in the same scope, you have to put it into the PageContext scope. And to totally equal, you first check to see if that object already exists in scope. So to get the equivalant of this:
<jsp:useBean id="cart" class="my.pack.ShoppingCart"/>Then your scriptlet looks like this:
<%@ page import="my.pack.ShoppingCart %>
<%
ShoppingCart cart = pageContext.getAttribute("cart");
if (cart == null) {
    cart = new ShoppingCart();
    pageContext.setAttribute("cart", cart);
%>So it is a lot more work.
As in my mind, a normal class can also
have it setter and getter methods for its properties.True ... See below.
But someone may say that, there is a scope="session",
which can be declared in an normal object.As long as the object is serializeable, yes.
It may be
a point but it can be easily solved but putting the
object in session by "session.setAttribute("cart",
cart)".Possible, but if the object isn't serializable it can be unsafe. As the point I mentioned above, the useBean tag allows you to check if the bean exists already, and use that, or make a new one if it does not yet exist in one line. A lot easier than the code you need to use otherwise.
I have been searching on this issue on the internet
for a long time and most of them just say someting
like "persistance of state", "bean follow some
conventions of naming", "bean must implement ser" and
so on. Right, that would go along the lines of the definition of what a JavaBean is.
All of above can be solved by other means, for
example, a normal class can also follow the
convention. And if it does - then it is a JavaBean! A JavaBean is any Object whose class definition would include all of the following:
1) A public, no-argument constructor
2) Implements Serializeable
3) Properties are revealed through public mutator methods (void return type, start with 'set' have a single Object parameter list) and public accessor methods (Object return type, void parameter list, begin with 'get').
4) Contain any necessary event handling methods. Depending on the purpose of the bean, you may include event handlers for when the properties change.
I am really get confused with it, and
really want to know what is the main point(s) of
using the java bean.JavaBeans are normal objects that follow these conventions. Because they do, then you can access them through simplified means. For example, One way of having an object in session that contains data I want to print our might be:
<%@ page import="my.pack.ShoppingCart %>
<%
ShoppingCart cart = session.getAttribute("cart");
if (cart == null) {
    cart = new ShoppingCart();
    session.setAttribute("cart", cart);
%>Then later where I want to print a total:
<% out.print(cart.getTotal() %>Or, if the cart is a JavaBean I could do this:
<jsp:useBean id="cart" class="my.pack.ShoppingCart" scope="session"/>
Then later on:
<jsp:getProperty name="cart" property="total"/>
Or perhaps I want to set some properties on the object that I get off of the URL's parameter group. I could do this:
<%
ShoppingCart cart = session.getAttribute("cart");
if (cart == null) {
    cart = new ShoppingCart();
    cart.setCreditCard(request.getParameter("creditCard"));
    cart.setFirstName(request.getParameter("firstName"));
    cart.setLastName(request.getParameter("lastName"));
    cart.setBillingAddress1(request.getParameter("billingAddress1"));
    cart.setBillingAddress2(request.getParameter("billingAddress2"));
    cart.setZipCode(request.getParameter("zipCode"));
    cart.setRegion(request.getParameter("region"));
    cart.setCountry(request.getParameter("country"));
    pageContext.setAttribute("cart", cart);
    session.setAttribute("cart", cart);
}Or you could use:
<jsp:useBean id="cart" class="my.pack.ShoppingCart" scope="session">
<jsp:setProperty name="cart" property="*"/>
</jsp:useBean>The second seems easier to me.
It also allows you to use your objects in more varied cases - for example, JSTL (the standard tag libraries) and EL (expression language) only work with JavaBeans (objects that follow the JavaBeans conventions) because they expect objects to have the no-arg constuctor, and properties accessed/changed via getXXX and setXXX methods.
>
Any help will be highly apprecaited. Thanks!!!
Best Regards,
Alex

Question about Hz difference between MacBook Pro and iMac?

Some will think I'm crazy for saying this, but my new MacBook is driving me nuts.
In a nutshell, I have tinnitus as a result of an accident some years ago. I can hear an intermittent high pitch sound coming from the back left of the machine. I used to hear a similar sound from old TVs back when I first got tinnitus. After some deduction I realised that it was to do (I think) with the fequency. I sold my old TV and brought a new one that was a 100Hz. My theory was somewhat confirmed when they delivered it and it was the 50Hz version and yes, the high pitch sound was very evident! Upon receipt of the 100Hz model and I immediately noticed the difference.
I'm guessing then that the MacBook has something inside emitting 50-60Hz - someone on this forum mentioned that too.
Although I want the portability, I can't stand that sound all day long, so I'm thinking of taking it back and swapping it for an iMac.
The question is, will I find the same problem? I'm not sure of the technical specifications in terms of Hz's between the two machines.
It's too noisy in the shop to tell.
Any advice appreciated.
PS - did not have this issue with my 2008 MacBook pro.
PPS - makes no difference if it's plugged in or not.

Isolating the source of the high frequency would take a technician with the instruments to deteermine what components emit sound...actually very easy to do with the proper test instruments, but essential to tell you what is causing the offending sound. Unless you know that it will be very hard to determine if the iMac will not do the same thing.
Only qualitative way to find out is go to an Apple store or reseller with a good selection of hardware, work with the different hardware and see if it bothers you. Preferably with few people around and low background noise level so the sound isn't masked.

Question about transfering files between windows OS and mac OS when using bootcamp

I'm thinking about buying the latest macbook pro, however, many of the statistical programs I use are only compatible with windows OS. I am aware of fusion and parallels, but I was advised to use bootcamp to maximize the performance of both the statistical programs AND the macbook itself. When using bootcamp, if I were to create a word document for my statistical output in the windows 7 partition, would I be able to access it directly from the hard drive in the mac OS partition using windows for mac? Any suggestions would be appreciated!

I run both Windows and OS X on my Mac. I would never ever want the Windows partition to have write access to my OS X partition. Be cautious when considering this ability. I would much prefer sharing files by a third drive, be it a flash drive, and external HDD, NAS, or an SD card.

Stock transfer between Plant/Storage location to Plant/Storage location

Dear Experts,
This is a MM component of SAP Retail.
We have 4 brands ( Plants of type B, Plants of type C etc) that needs inventory from the same Distribution center (Plant A) for some common products. Here the direction is to prioritize the inventory per brand. The requirement is one brand should not take the inventory of the other brand.
To overcome this problem , the solution proposed is to have different storage location for different brands in the same DC.
When we run replenishment planning for the brands and do a ATP check, the availability check should consider only the one issuing storage location in the DC which we allocated for the brand.
I do see the following set up in SPRO and I have done the following.
Step1: Activate Stock Transfer between Storage Locations SPRO->Material Management->Purchasing->Purchase Order->set up stock transport order->set up stock transport order between storage locations-> u2018Activate Stock transfer between storage locationsu2019
Step2: Assign Delivery Type and checking rule according to storage
SPRO->Material Management->Purchasing->Purchase Order->set up stock transport order->set up stock transport order between storage locations->Assign Delivery Type and Checking Rule According to Storage
Step3: Define Shipping Data for Stock Transfer between Storage Locations
SPRO ->Material Management ->Purchasing ->Purchase Order ->set up stock transport order ->set up stock transport order between storage locations -> Define Shipping Data for Stock Transfers between Storage Locations 
Step4: Define Rule for Determination off Shipping Point SPRO->Material Management->Purchasing->Purchase Order->set up stock transport order->set up stock transport order between storage locations -> Set-up Storage-Location u2013dependent shipping point determination->Define rule for determination of shipping point
Step5: Shipping Point Assignment According to Storage Location
SPRO->Material Management->Purchasing->Purchase Order->set up stock transport order->set up stock transport order between storage locations-> Set-up Storage-Location u2013dependent shipping point determination-> Assign Shipping Points According to Storage Location
Question.No:1- After completing the above set up in me21n, the issuing storage location field is greyed out. I am not able to enter any value here. Can you please help.
Question.No:2
I do see the following setting.
Under IMG ---> Material Management ---> Purchasing --> Purchase Order --> Set up Stock Transport Order -->Business Add-In for Determination of Issuing Storage Location
Display the IMPLEMENTATION
Double click on the method GET_SUPPLYING_SL
Click the Execute button
Click the detail button on IF_EX_MD_EXT_SUP
Execute GET_SUPPLYING_SL
There is a prerequisite for this BADI .I have done those things.What i dont understand is where to force the combination of supplying site/issuing stor.loc/receiving site/receiving stor.loc
Kindly provide your inputs.
Thanks,
Vasanthan

Dear,
Have You configure MRP in second plant (where you want to transport the Material).
Please try with this and do again Po for stock transport.
Regards
Piyush Patel

Billing in Stock Transfer between two plants of two different company codes

Hi Friends,
I am doing the scenario of stock transfer between two plants of different company codes.
I have some issues in Billing for this..
What are the settings do i need to to for Pricing in SD point of view.
Ex:
Supplying         /         Receiving
Com.Code:2000     /        CompanyCode:1000
Plant:2100              /         Plant:1100
SA:2000/10/00      /          SA:1000/10/00
I created Customer 5555 w.r.t sales area of supplying company code (2000/10/00)
I created Vendor 7777 and assigned Supplying Plant 2100 in add purchasing data.
In IMG Settings:
Define Shipping Data for Plants: In Receving Plant i assigned customer 5555 and sales area blank
                                                    In Supplying Plant i assigned customer blank and sales area as 2000/10/00
Create Checking Rule: Standard(B SD Delivery)
Define Checking Rule: Standard(Avallability-01assigned to checking rule B)
Assign Delivery Type and Checking rule: Document type(NB)-Supplying Plant(2100)-Delivery Type(NLCC)-Checking Rule-(B)
Assign Doc Type:Supplying Plant(2100)-Receving Plant(1100)-Doc type(NB)
What are Pricing settings in SD i have to do?????????
Process:
ME21N->VL10B->VL02N(PGI)->VF01(IV)->MIGO->MIRO
I have gone through many threads in Forum but confusion in Pricing Part..
Some are mixing with the inter company sales proces..
Pls guide me..
With Regards

Do the following steps for STO Customizing:-
1. Create a customer master record for the issuing plant.
2. Create a vendor master record for the issuing plant, and enter customer account number in the Customer field on the Control screen.
3. Repeat steps 1 and 2 for the receiving plant.
4. Assign the plants to the customer master record in Customizing for Materials Management (MM), by choosing Purchasing <Purchase Order < Set Up Stock Transport Order< Plants.
The Process Flow would be as follows :-
Create a stock transport order, following the standard procedure, and send the order to the issuing plant.
Issuing plant has processes your order, and when it is ready to ship,the storeperson at the issuing plant issues the goods using a transfer posting. The excise clerk there creates an excise invoice.The excise supervisor verifies and posts the excise invoice.It then sends the goods to you, together with the excise invoice.
Once the goods arrive, you follow the standard procedure for incoming excise invoices:
The excise clerk captures the excise invoice, using the stock transport order as the reference document. The storeperson enters the goods receipt, again using the stock transport order as the reference document.Alternatively, you can first enter the goods receipt and then capture the excise invoice.
The excise supervisor then posts the excise invoice.
Best Regards,
Ankur

Stock transfer between the two manufacturing plants

Dear Experts,
I am doing the stock transfer between the 2 excisable plants
1.First we will transfer the Semi finished material from one manufacturing plant to another manufacturing plants.
2.After receiving the material in the receiving plant, they will convert SFG to FG.
3.FG material will transfer to another non excisable plant.
Is we need to pay the excise 2 times (1st time as a SFG material, 2nd time as a FG material)
What is the exact procedure for this scenario.
Regards,
Narendra

Respected Lakshmipathiji,
i was little confused here...
"""Coming to your query, you need to levy tax on the selling price / assessabale value when sending the FG to non-excisable plant""""
Tax means are you talking about sales tax?
when we transfer the Finished goods from manufacturing plant to Non-manufacturing plant---Will it attracts Sales tax?
Please throw some light here sir..
Note to Narendra: this will be completely depends on your client--currently at my client they will transfer semi finished/Finished goods from one plant to another as sales cycle(attracts only excise values)--once after receival of stock--the receiving plant will raise PO to supply plant followed by MIGO and MIRO--there by the same excise values will be settled in MIRO settings(user will enter excise values manually in MIGO/MIRO to match the origin of stock transfer sales invoice)( i was not completely aware why they do so--may be need to get more clarity from my MM counterpart)
Phanikumar

Stock transfer between storage location in IS -Retail

Hi,
I want to have a Stock transfer order between two storage locations in the plant.
I have activated the "Activate Stock Transfer Between Storage Locations", now i can create a STO and have the "Issuing SLoc" tab.
Having that i get an error message "Not possible to determine shipping data for material XXX" Message no. 06280.
I am trying to have the shipping data in customizing for set stock transfer - "Define Shipping Data for Plants", but my site is not listed due to the use of IS Retail. Is there a way to configure it?
Tnx
Lior

Hello Lior,
in Retail your distribution center is a vendor and a customer, and your store is a customer. Therefore when you create master data for your distribution centre and store, you also create the vendor and customer masters that are required.
By this link of the DC / Store to the customer master the shipping data is derived. I hope this answers your question.
If you have further queries related to this, please do post them.
Regards,
Smitha

Stock transfer between company codes

Dear Experts,
I am doing stock transfer between two different company codes. Purchasing order type wil be NB & SD delivery type will be : NLCC
i have done all w.r.t configuration requirement for between company code, when i go for ME21N, unable to get purchasing order type NB but its showing only UB & item category U. systme giving message like : item category U & pur order type is UB would like to proceed. But it would be for between plants within same company code.
Please assist me where i am doing wrong...
Best Regards
Badari
Edited by: badaripro on Feb 23, 2010 7:15 PM
Edited by: badaripro on Feb 23, 2010 7:15 PM

Dear Badari,
I don't understand. Do you say that you just start ME21N and can only choose order type UB there? In this case it has nothing to do with the question if the STO is cross-company or not, since the system doesn't know the plants yet.
I would assume somebody just deleted the document type NB in your customising or you are not authorised to use it - please start ME21N again, observe the error (can't choose NB), leave the trs and run trs SU53 to check your authorisations.
BR
Raf

What is Cycle or steps to create Stock transfer between plants.

What is Cycle or steps to create Stock transfer between plants.
Reply with T Codes & Justify

Hello RM
We can transfer stocks within a company code between 2 plants using 3 methods:
1) Using single step simple stock transfer (Mvt Type 301).
2) Using two step stock transfer (Mvt Types 303 and then 305).
3) Using a stock transport order(STO) again it is based on 2 things:
a) r u using STO with delivery or
b) without delivery.
Though the first two steps are very simple to process but using STO has its own advantages: 1) Quantity in transit can be monitored 2) delivery costs can be entered in the STO.
First 2 steps (single step and 2 step plant to plant transfer) can be done using MIGO tcode , selecting stock transfer and entering the relevant mvt types.
would like to tell you about STO as it is an important process.
STO without delivery, the following functions are provided to support the Internal Stock Transfer without Delivery :
#Create Stock Transport Order
#Post goods issue for stock transport order
#Post goods receipt for stock transport order
Config Step required before processing above steps:
Setting Up Stock Transport Order: Purchasing Document Type, the purpose of this activity is to specify which document type is to be used for a certain combination of supplying (issuing) plant and receiving plant.
Path go to SPRO--MM-Purchasing---PO-Set up STO-----assign doc type, one step procedure, underdelivery tolerances.
There you have to enter your supplying and receving plant with the Purchasing doc type( UB).
Now the process:
1) Receiving plant will create a STO towards issuing plant.
2) Issuing plant will transfer material from their unrestricted use stock to stokc in transit using mvt type 351.
3) Receiving plant receives the goods using MIGO mvt type 101.
Regards
Yogesh

Stock Transfer between 2 different instances of SAP

Hi for all,
I want to know if anyone has any documentation about how to do a Stock transfer between 2 different instances of SAP, the worst part that I think is how to see a plant from one SAP to another, any collaboration will be appreciate.
Edited by: Ruy Osório de Freitas Neto on Mar 5, 2008 6:24 PM

I still don't see the difference between what you are telling me and the material i handled to you....
This material exactly describes the case where you have to wharehouse working in whatever ERP systems at the same time.
The ALE configurations are only one step between them.
The idoc types for purchasing are ORDERS, ORDRCHG,ORDRRSP, Quotes
For LE are Desadv,Shpmnt
Processo
Entrar um movimento de mercadorias no sistema ERP.
O sistema cria automaticamente um recebimento ou uma entrega com base nesse movimento de mercadorias.
O sistema transfere o recebimento por meio da BAPI InboundDelivery.SaveReplica (a entrega, por meio da BAPI OutboundDelivery.SaveReplica) do sistema ERP para o SAD, onde representa uma solicitação ao depósito para armazenar ou retirar mercadorias.
No sistema descentralizado, uma ordem de transferência no depósito é criada para a entrega ou para o recebimento, respectivamente.
Executar a entrega/recebimento físico(a) das mercadorias.
Confirmar a ordem de transferência no depósito.
Após a confirmação da ordem de transferência no depósito, é lançada a entrada de mercadorias para o recebimento (ou saída de mercadorias para a entrega). Isso libera a posição intermediária.
Essa atividade inicia a confirmação para o sistema ERP por meio da BAPI InboundDelivery.ConfirmDecentral para o recebimento e por meio da BAPI OutboundDelivery.ConfirmDecentral para a entrega.
O lançamento da entrada ou saída de mercadorias no sistema ERP ocorre automaticamente quando a confirmação é registrada no sistema.
Quando a entrada ou saída de mercadorias é lançada no sistema ERP, a transferência de estoque é lançada simultaneamente na Administração de Estoques.

Stock Transfer between plants two steps.

DearAll,
We are using the scenario stock transfer between plants two steps.in the source plant we are issueing the goods with on 303 movement in MIGO with Remove from storage option. in the receiving plant we are receiving the goods with refernce to 303 material document in MIGO with place in storage option.
we are using the version SAP 4.7.
my problem is at the time of goods receipt SAP is allowing to the posting date less than the source plant 303 document date. it should allow the posting date as Greater than equal to source plant document date at the time of GR.
Any standard pracktise is there.
for example source plant 303 document date is 08.06.2009 wrongly i have entered the receiving plant 305 document posting date as 06.06.2009 it is allowing to post it is not throw any information. it should not allow to know.
i want to control this. any standard controls is there. kindly help.
Regards
P.Anandhakumar
Edited by: Anandhakumar Palanisamy on Jun 9, 2009 10:46 AM

Except user exit , Is it possible any standard functionality.?
why SAP not controlled this?.
this is SAP bug or not?. kindly clarify..
Regards
P.Anandhakumar....

The Question about stock transfer between HU-Management and WM-Management

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for