10% of Basic amount

Hi
This is regarding provision amount calucation :
when we run the payroll every month , it should generate the provision amount for indeminty as 10% of basic in custom wage type - so please let me know how to write the PCR.
regards
Nalini

Hi,
As per our knowledge ur senario is like this.
suppose your basic wage is 1BAS
on this 10% you need to another ustomer wage 2CUS.
1BAS
amt%10
addwte2cus
for example basic 1BAS=1000
then 2CUS comes in rt 100.
If you have any query's on this pls let me know.
Thanks and Regards,
Revathi.

Similar Messages

Can we create routine for PO excise duty should calculate at basic amount

Dear All,
can we create routine for Purchase order excise duty should calculate at basic amount not after discounted value.
actually at per current scenario system is calculating excise duty after discount base amount, but
we want to write a routine/scenario excise duty should calculate at basic value not after discount value.
Regards
chandrashekar

Hi,
In my opinion you have two alternatives to resolve your problem:
1. To customize some special solution for this; this can be made by adding a new pricing condition similar with the VAT pricing condition (let's call it ZMWS); this pricing condition should be as absolute value and accepted as manual in the document / pricing procedure
2. Something similar to your solution (I have used this for some customer) to have in the credit memo two lines, one with VAT and one without VAT; the one without VAT should have a negative price = price from the line with VAT.
For this second solution I would recommend you to have two different special materials "DUMMY" materials, lets say "DUMMY without VAT" and "DUMMY with VAT"
BR,
Valentin

Query to get the Excise amount and basic amount based on the cst or vat tax

Dear all,
                   I need a right query to get the basic amount ,excise amount and the tax amount based on the CST or VAT tax rate.The output should be like this,
VAT
goods excisabe at 1% - taxable amt(basic+excise for vat 1%)            tax amt
goods excisable at 4%-   txable amt                                                       tax amt
CST
goods excisabe at 1% - taxable amt(basic+excise for CST 1%)            tax amt
My problem will also be solved..if i am able to get the basic value from base table OPCH itself............Since am using the PCH1 table to get the total basic amt...the values are duplicating.
Regards,
Shyam

Hi Sowjanya,
If you're simply trying to place a grand total, use the 'Insert Summary' option.
Choose the measure field as the 'Field to Summarize' > Choose 'Sum' as the summary operation > Under 'Summary Location' choose 'Grand Total Report Footer'.
-Abhilash

How to determine Tax and Basic amount from BSEG entry

Hi Guru's,
How can I determine from the BSEG table the following lines for one BELNR?
I need to know the TAX amount and the basic amount (without TAX). When I search the bseg table I see tree lines and the field DMBTR contains all values but I need to determine which line is the line with tax amount and the line with the basic amount.
Hope someone can help me out.
Best regards.
Edited by: Julius Bussche on Jan 9, 2009 1:58 PM
Please use meaningfull subject titles.

Hello,
How can I determine from the BSEG table the following lines for one BELNR?
I need to know the TAX amount and the basic amount (without TAX). When I search the bseg table I see tree lines and the field DMBTR contains all values but I need to determine which line is the line with tax amount and the line with the basic amount.
In our system we have BSEG-BUZID: 'T' (for Tax items)
For the Tax line:
BSEG-HWBAS: Tax Base Amount in Local Currency
BSEG-DMBTR: Tax Amount in Local Currency
Hope this helps.
BR,
Suhas
Edited by: Suhas Saha on Jan 9, 2009 1:39 PM

Calculation of tax on Basic amount is wrong in PO

hi frends, we have made a SERVICE PO with following details :
basic price : 332000/-
in invoice tab service tax : 10.3 %
according to this the tax on PO should be 34196
but in condition tab for this item it is showing tax = 38965.81
where could be the problem we have checked out everything

alos frends the "landed price " for the item in condition tab is not same as that of net price.
landed price displayed: 417,275.00
net price : 378,308.81

Overtime Amount not to be added as Basic

Hi All,
Here, at our client, an Infotype is created for Overtime and the amount is paid through IT 0015.
While calculating the 'Tax Exemption on HRA' the basic amount is taken as Basic + OT ( /114 + Approved OT Amount). But as per the scenario, only 'Basic' is to be counted for HRA Tax Calculation.
Can any one suggest if any changes to schema has to be done? if so where we need to change?
Regards,
Sailaja

Check the PCL for that wage type in V_512w_D mainly check the CC
not sure which one will upadate u
Check CC14
and check with hemanths response
Edited by: Sikindar on Feb 24, 2009 4:50 PM

Calculate Excise amount as per duty rates check box in J1IEX

Hi,
              In J1IEX Duty rates tab, there is one check box as Calculate excise duty base on duty rates , but thta check box is Disable i How to make it as enable so that we can click to to recalculate the excise rate,
also my problem is that in case of import PO, the basic price in our PO is diffrent compare to basic price of custom . because custom is addding the basic frieght and insurance charges in Basic price, so while Doing J1IEX ref. to MIRO number it is taking properly amount of all excise duties but excise base amount is diffrent and when we correct the excise base amount as per custom Bill of entry all excise amount are change and it is not coming as per duty rates which are present i Duty rates tab so I want to recalculate it.
regards,
zafar

Hi ,
             As per detail which I have mention in my question, the process which we are following is after recieving import Material   first we are doing   MIRO for custom delivery cost   and there we are entering tax amount as per custom bill of entry,   and we are getting the MIRO Documnet number    after that we are Doing    Capture Excise invoice thorugh J1IEX and ref. document we are selecting as PO, after pressing enter we get a small pop up window as customs invocie number and year there we are entering the MIRO document number and Year   then ref. to that miro number All duty and duty rates are coming as per MIRO   but Excise base amount is different because it is coming from PO basic amount and there is diffrence between Custom excise base amount and PO bae amount becasue in custom bae amount they are adding frieght basic amount into excise base amount , and then we have to correct amnually exsice base amount in J1IEX   for all materials, is this proceess is same in all or we need to do some modification in pricing procedure or at any other place .
          At bottom in excsie duty tab in J1IEX there is one check box as Calculates excise amount base on excise duty but that check box is also disable   How to make that enable.
I also have found one FM : J_1IEX_DEFAULT_EXCISE_DUTY,   by doing some changes in this FM we can get what we requied , is there any other solution to get our requirement.
regards,
   zafar
Edited by: zafar_karnalkar on May 15, 2010 1:47 PM

Purchase Register Custom Report -

Hi Expert,
Hope you all are fine!
I am new to CIN.
I have to develop a custom report for LIV details which will contain the follwing column:
could you please help me to know from where i can take these field i.e reference table and links.
Tax Invoice (ref no.)
Invoice Date
Vendor Code
Vendor Name
Vendor complete Address
State
Line item Description in invoice
Vendor TIN
Vendor CST
Value of Goods
Freight & octroi
Packing & Forwarding
Excise Duty
Education cess
Sec.Education
CST value
VAT Value
Tax Code
Tax Code Description.

As per ur reference: -
In PO, Condition are like--- PO Qty is 10
Basic Amount..........1000
taxes.........................100
Freight.........................50
Other...........................20
and we have receive only 5 qty out of them, means all the condition amount will be 50%. like...
Basic Amount..........500
taxes.........................50
Freight.......................25
Other.........................10
all condition will be calculate according to qty 5 not for 10 as showing in PO..
I want to pick these condition. (according to 5 qty.)..
Now suggest...

Error in MIRO for input tax calculation

HI Gurus,
We are facing problem at the time of logistic invoice verification in case of purchase orders with account assignments. Following is the set-up for executing MIRO:
1.     Purchase Order with (PO no. 4700000010)
1.1.     Account assignment category.
1.2.     Tax code.
2.     Goods Receipt MIGO
3.     Vendor Invoice booking MIRO
After doing about mentioned steps, document created at the MIGO step shows correct liability and Asset / Expense a/c.
At the time of vendor invoice verification (MIRO), system picks up only CST condition for vendor liability and non deductible excise conditions are reversed against the asset/expenses. For E.G.
1. PO created
Basic amount                   100.00
+ Basic Excise (16%)        16.00 (non-deductible)
+ Ecess             (02%)       00.32 (non-deductible)
+ Hcess             (01%)       00.16 (non-deductible)
+ CST                (03%)       03.49 (non-deductible)
                   119.97
2. MIGO Transaction
Asset / Expenses A/c -
Dr        119.97
To Prov. For Liability                          119.97
3. MIRO Transaction
Provision for Liability A/c -
Dr   119.97
To Vendor a/c.                                       103.97
To Asset / Expenses a/c                           16.00
(16.00 Basic excise duty)
At the time of MIRO, it should had posted
Provision for Liability A/c -
Dr   119.97
To Vendor a/c.                                       119.97
In case Pos without account assignment all accounting entry are posting correctly.
Kindly provide suitable solution ASAP.
Thanks in advance

Hi All,
Thank you for support. But my problem is not getting solved. Situation is as below
Entry is generated
GR/IR Dr. 100
Tax     Dr.    25.50
Vendor          Cr. 101.25 (90% split on total amount)
Vendor          Cr.   11.25 (10% split on total amount)
Items are split based on installment payment term correctly. however since tax need to be paid immediately it should split like this:
GR/IR Dr. 100
Tax     Dr.    25.50
Vendor          Cr. 115.50 (90% split of 100 GR/IR value + 25.5 of tax )
Vendor          Cr.   10 (10% split)
Then in OBY6 I enabled amount split. When I try to post invoice in MIRO with amount split I am getting error: Account assignment not completed for all required fields (PayT) Message no. F5A034. And in payment tab payment terms fields are missing. I have ticked 'Enable amount split' in OBY6. and have updated amount split tab.
How to do this in system?
Thanks,
Pushkar
Edited by: Pushkar Marathe on Sep 3, 2011 7:23 AM

Annual Provident Fund not coming as per projection.

Hi,
Annual provident fund is not calculated as per projection basis (Nominal Basis) whenever employee getting LWP.
present calculation in the month of April : Actual Basic = 9000
Basic(after 1 day LWP) 12% : 870012%= 1044-00
Projection : current month PF + current month11 months= 1044+104411 =12528
But it should be the current month PF + 12% on actual basic * remaining months: 1044+1080*11= 13012
Please suggest me to resolve this issue.
Thanks & regards,
vv.

hi,
thanks for your reply. /3f6 is coming as explained above. But in another client (sand box) it is coming fine as per projection basis.
it should be the 12% of annual Basic amount. But annual basic is coming ok.
Thanks & regards,
VV

How to Read Infotype 0587 (PF IT)

Dear Experts,
I am stuck in the mid month joining situation. My query is when an employee joins in the mid of the month, and due to LOP, his / her basic becomes Rs. 10,000, in that case, the PF is getting deducted on Rs. 6500 on a pro-rata basis. At my client side rule is as follows:
1. If Eligible Pay radio button is selected, then PF should deduct on basic, eg., in this case 12% of 10000 = Rs. 1200
2. If PF basis is selected, the on Basis Amount, i.e., if basic is more than Rs. 6500, then Rs. 780 (12% of Rs. 6500), and if less than Rs. 6500, then whatever is the basic amount, it should deduct 12% on the same.
So in this case, the PF should deduct as Rs. 780, but it is deducting on pro-rated amount of Rs. 6500, which is wrong as per rule.
Kindly help me to create a pcr, so as to solve the issue. I have created a PCR, but what happens is if PF basis radio button is selected, it works fine in that case, but if Eligible Pay Radio button is selected, the calculcation is Rs. 780 only. I want to call those two radio button in PCR, and reach to the feasible solution.
Thanks and Regards,
Bhagyashree

there are 4 pcr's in schema ZNN1, attached as follows:
In table V_T511K, created a constant as ZPFBAS, maintained value as 6500.
In schema ZNN1, values entered are:
PCR's are:
ZPF1
ZPF2
ZPF3
ZPF4
1. ZPF1
2. ZPF2
3. ZPF3
4. ZPF4
Thanks and Regards,
Bhagyashree

PF Basis Issue

Dear Experts,
I was having an issue for PF Mid Month joinees. Where, supposing if an employee's Basic is Rs. 20000, and joins on 15th of the month, then basic becomes Rs. 10000. But SAP was calculating it on the basis of Rs. 6500 for 15 days. I had written a PCR for the same, and works fine. But due to this PCR, another situation has come across. If for any employee, we do not want to deduct PF, still it is getting deducted. When I comment this rule in my schema, it works fine, but due to commenting this rule, mid month joinees Pf gets affected. Please guide me how to solve this issue using single schema.
Thanks and Regards,
Bhagyashree

Hi Bhagyashree,
During Hiring in IT587 you have 2 option to decide on how pf gets deducted...
Basis for Contribution
Eligibility pay or PF basis which ever is less (i.e by default for any basic above Rs 6500/-- system will take Rs 6500/- as basic amount)
PF Basis :- PF will be deducted as per basic....
"But SAP was calculating it on the basis of Rs. 6500 for 15 days"
In this case first option might has been clicked...... Uncheck it & opt option 2.....
Regards,
Veeram

Employer pension contribution issue

Hi experts,
please suggest me this issue as per SAP employer pension contribution have to deduct 541 rupees based of 6500 basic amount with 8.33%. More than 6500 basic amount have to add in 3.67% employer PF contribution.So one employee basic is 50000 rupees per month but employee has joined on 09.04.2008 so his basic is 36667 rupees.employer PF is 4400 rupees. Now employer pension contribution have to deduct only on 6500 of 8.33% that amount is 541 remaining amount have to add in 3.67% of employer pf contribution. So employer pension contribution is 541 amd employer PF contribution is 3859 but system is calculating 541/30days*22 days so system showing 397 rupees. But my client asking system have to show 541 rupees. Please suggest me you can get reward points
Thanks and regards
Raghuram

hi,
the total EPS contribution should not exceed 541 per month or
541 * 12 for a year , if it is less then actually there is no issue.
There is a valid reason in ur case , the employee is not present for all working days in this month.
Regards
sameer

Purchase Register Report issue

Hi,
I am working Purchase Register report.
In this, we have a PO with 10 Quantity. But at the time of MIGO we receive 5 qty out of 10.
Now how can we pick the amount according to 5 qty received from MIGO because we want show MIGO condition in our report not from PO.
What should be the table link for this...
Plz guide..

As per ur reference: -
In PO, Condition are like--- PO Qty is 10
Basic Amount..........1000
taxes.........................100
Freight.........................50
Other...........................20
and we have receive only 5 qty out of them, means all the condition amount will be 50%. like...
Basic Amount..........500
taxes.........................50
Freight.......................25
Other.........................10
all condition will be calculate according to qty 5 not for 10 as showing in PO..
I want to pick these condition. (according to 5 qty.)..
Now suggest...

Issue regarding partial payment & cleared items.

hi Techies,
I want to develop report which should show all cleared item. (accounting document no, corresponiding basic amount). End user is using residual clearence procedure for partial payment. i.e.,
consider if vendor has to pay rs 10000 as service tax to company , its stored in open items against one Accountin Document no.
Belnr            Amt
000101 -
> 10,000
supppoes he pays 3000
system is creating one clearing document against this 3000 payment.
NOW REST OF 7000 EARLIER CLERING DOCUMENT IS BECOME ACCOUNTING DOCUENT . THIS CYCLE IS CONTINE UNTIL CLEARS ALL THE AMOUNT.
INTIAL STATE.
000101 -
> 10,000 -
> CL1. (PAID 3000)
SECOND STATE
CL1        -
>   7,000----
> CL2 (PAID 3000)
THIRD STATE
CL2        -
>   4,000----
> CL3 (PAID 3000)
FOURTH STATE
CL3        -
>   1,000----
> CL4 (PAID 1000)
FIFTH STATE
CL4        -
>   1,000----
> CL5 CLEARS ALL AMT
HE WANT TO DISPALAY ACCOUNTING DOCUMETN NO WHICH ARE CLOSED (I.E. CLEARED )
AT THE END OF FIFTH STATE ONLY THIS ACCOUNTING DOCUMENT NO SHOULD DISPLAY IN REPORT OTHEWISE NOT.( IE IF USER RUN THE REPORT AT SECOND OR THIRD STATE, THE ACCUNTING DOCUMENT NO SHOULD NOT DISPLAY )
THERE IS NO LIMIT OF PARTIAL PAYMETNS I.E VENDOR CAN PAY HIS AMOUNT AS MANY TIEMS HE WISHES.
IS THERE ANY SOLUTION TO THIS REPORT...
REGARDS
RAJU

Hi,
Yes it is possible.
Check the docuement types of the documents, you should get the answer in that.
Regards,
Prakash Pandey

10% of Basic amount

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for