10G EE with Partitioning

Is there anyone out there that can specify what is included with the purchase of the above software licensing? When installing the software, Oracle Enterprise Manager Database Control automatically installs. According to some of the documentation on the web, there are Management Packs that can be accessed through OEM that require more licensing; what Packs come preloaded that should not be used?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.

I believe this is true just by looking at the price list which you can find here:
http://www.oracle.com/corporate/pricing/technology-price-list.pdf
Regards
Tim

Similar Messages

Table creation with partition

following is the table creation script with partition
CREATE TABLE customer_entity_temp (
BRANCH_ID NUMBER (4),
ACTIVE_FROM_YEAR VARCHAR2 (4),
ACTIVE_FROM_MONTH VARCHAR2 (3),
partition by range (ACTIVE_FROM_YEAR,ACTIVE_FROM_MONTH)
(partition yr7_1999 values less than ('1999',TO_DATE('Jul','Mon')),
partition yr12_1999 values less than ('1999',TO_DATE('Dec','Mon')),
it gives an error
ORA-14036: partition bound value too large for column
but if I increase the size of the ACTIVE_FROM_MONTH column to 9 , the script works and creates the table. Why is it so ?
Also, by creating a table in this way and populating the table data in their respective partitions, all rows with month less than "JULY" will go in yr7_1999 partition and all rows with month value between "JUL" and "DEC" will go in the second partition yr12_1999 , where will the data with month value equal to "DEC" go?
Plz help me in solving this problem
thanks n regards
Moloy

Hi,
You declared ACTIVE_FROM_MONTH VARCHAR2 (3) and you try to check it against a date in your partitionning clause:TO_DATE('Jul','Mon')so you should first check your data model and what you are trying to achieve exactly.
With such a partition decl, you will not be able to insert dates from december 1998 included and onward. The values are stricly less than (<) not less or equal(<=) hence such lines can't be inserted. I'd advise you to check the MAXVALUE value jocker and the ENABLE ROW MOVEMENT partitionning clause.
Regards,
Yoann.

How to get the MAC address of the additional 10G NIC with ILO command line

how to get the MAC address of the additional 10G NIC with ILO command line?
thanks.
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Hi Bruce,
Out from what I can find on this network card is it not possible to get the mac address without a OS. I would recommend you to get/burn a Linux/Ubuntu live CD/DVD and run a Ifconfig in there.
Hope it helps you.
Best regards
Zincas
I work on behalf of HP

CONNECTING ORACLE 9I OR 10G DATABASE WITH ORACLE 10G FORMS AND REPORTS

pls tell how to connect oracle 9i or 10g database with oracle developer suite 10g . though the forms are getting connected but not running with error as
FRM-10142 the HTTP listner is not running on pls start the listner or check your runtime preferences.
now pls tell how to start listner and how to chage runtime preferences.
though i have worked with oracle 9i and forms 6i where we used to copy the tnsnames.ora from network/admin of oracle to forms 6i tnsnames.ora.
thank you, you may be thinking such a long question.....

sir
By server i mean the computer where oc4j and backend database are running is one one of the client pc not a dedicated server..., these database and 10g dev suite are installed in one of the client machine,
all the clients are using same internet explorer as browser.
no message is being displyed on some of the client machine where these forms are not being uploaded on browser instead it displays as done in status bar without actually showing anything at all...
sir so far as jinitiator or JRE is concered i have seen on the client machine (where my forms are running on internet explorer) a pop up is displyed telling one activex control is required to run this program and click to install it..
after clicking it download jinitiator from server and after installing jinitiator my forms are loaded and start functioning...
what i feel is as i said this machine where oc4j and database is running is one of the client machine so some other clients do not have acess to this machine, so this might be the reason why those clints are not able to run the said forms on the internet explorer.... can it be so... kindly tell..
thank you for your patience for reading the question

Compliance of Oracle 10g R2 with Windows XP SP2

Hello everybody
I am representing my company for making a decision of deploying appropriate versions for Oracle and Windows.
The vendor suggested Oracle 9 on Windows Server 2003, whereas we opted for deploying Oracle 10g R2 with Windows XP SP2.
According to the vendor
XP is not a true 'server' product and therefore does not provide many server functions and may have restrictions on numbers of users that can connect.
If the vendor's notion is correct, would anyone explain the limitations/restrictions of our solution.

One of the first problems that you will encounter, inbound connections limit in Windows XP:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314882
Memory allocations are handled differently between Windows 2003 and XP (paged pool, non-paged pool, file system caching, etc.):
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa366778.aspx
In some cases the memory allocation differences can cause XP to display errors indicating "unable to allocate memory from the paged pool" or the non-paged pool, when Windows 2003 would otherwise continue functioning without problem. Windows 2003 offers a registry change to work around this problem:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/312362
Microsoft will stop making Windows XP available for resale in June 2008, except on extremely light-weight computers, and update support will end before update support ends for Windows 2003.
There are typically differences in the hardware that ships with a computer loaded with Windows XP and one that ships with Windows 2003. You will have a hard time finding a computer with Windows XP that ships with redundant power supplies, dual backplanes, SCSI RAID 10 support, dual network interfaces, built-in system/diagnostics, etc.
While Windows 2003 is the server equivalent of Windows XP, there are many features in Windows 2003 that are not available in Windows XP. XP is designed to be rebooted frequently (shut down every night, or reboot once a week or once a month) and is geared toward foreground application performance. Windows Server 2003 is designed to be rebooted infrequently (apply security updates, recover from rare system fatal bugs) and is geared toward providing good background application performance (the Oracle database instance would be a background application).
If you are unfamilar with Windows Server 2003, take a look at the books "Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Administrator's Companion" by Microsoft Press and "Mastering Windows Server 2003" by Sybex. Compare what you find in those books with what you might find in Microsoft's Windows XP Resource Kit book.
Charles Hooper
IT Manager/Oracle DBA
K&M Machine-Fabricating, Inc.

OWB 10G R2 with 9.2 DB....

At my company the standard for databases is still 9.2. Since this is a large organization, we are a little slow to adopt the latest versions (we are still running OWB 9.2.0.8).
According to the FAQ, Design repositories for OWB 10g R2 can be setup on a 9.2 DB.
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/warehouse/htdocs/owb_10gr2_faq.html#37
In the FAQ, it also says to look at the Certify page in Metalink to see what databases are supported by OWB 10g R2:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/warehouse/htdocs/owb_10gr2_faq.html#35
In the Certify page, only 10g R2 DB appears to be certified for OWB 10g R2.
Is anyone running OWB 10g R2 with 9.2 DB (for both Design and Runtime environments)? Any problems with this setup?
Since OWB 10g R2 is a new release, could it be certified for 9.2 DB later?
Since it is not certified for 9.2 DB, will Oracle give support if we run into problems?
I thought one of the major advantages of OWB was suppose to be compatibility between database versions. I was surprised not to see that 9.2 was not certified.

Hi,
You can have OWB 10G R2 on Oracle 9.2.
We are using OWB 10G R2 on Oracle 9.2.
I have done instalation on both Windows and Unix environment.
What you need is patch 9.2.0.6.0
Regards
Amit
9820579749

ORA-00604 ORA-00904 When query partitioned table with partitioned indexes

Got ORA-00604 ORA-00904 When query partitioned table with partitioned indexes in the data warehouse environment.
Query runs fine when query the partitioned table without partitioned indexes.
Here is the query.
SELECT al2.vdc_name, al7.model_series_name, COUNT (DISTINCT (al1.vin)),
al27.accessory_code
FROM vlc.veh_vdc_accessorization_fact al1,
vlc.vdc_dim al2,
vlc.model_attribute_dim al7,
vlc.ppo_list_dim al18,
vlc.ppo_list_indiv_type_dim al23,
vlc.accy_type_dim al27
WHERE ( al2.vdc_id = al1.vdc_location_id
AND al7.model_attribute_id = al1.model_attribute_id
AND al18.mydppolist_id = al1.ppo_list_id
AND al23.mydppolist_id = al18.mydppolist_id
AND al23.mydaccytyp_id = al27.mydaccytyp_id
AND ( al7.model_series_name IN ('SCION TC', 'SCION XA', 'SCION XB')
AND al2.vdc_name IN
('PORT OF BALTIMORE',
'PORT OF JACKSONVILLE - LEXUS',
'PORT OF LONG BEACH',
'PORT OF NEWARK',
'PORT OF PORTLAND'
AND al27.accessory_code IN ('42', '43', '44', '45')
GROUP BY al2.vdc_name, al7.model_series_name, al27.accessory_code

I would recommend that you post this at the following OTN forum:
Database - General
General Database Discussions
and perhaps at:
Oracle Warehouse Builder
Warehouse Builder
The Oracle OLAP forum typically does not cover general data warehousing topics.

Using AGO function with partitions

I have a situation where we have logical sources with the same repository folder that are partitioned. We would like to use the AGO function but are getting the following error:
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 22042] AGO function may not be used on '# Applied Invoices' because its source is horizontally partitioned. (HY000)
Has anyone had success using the AGO function with partitions? If not, do you have an alternate solution to the problem?

AGO doesn't work with partitions - it's documented on metalink....there's an enhancement request , but that's it - no work-around provided....I'd suggest creating a common view for that particular report

DATACOPY with partitioned data source

Hello,
I am actually working on the Hyperion Essbase EPM 11.1.2
I am trying to perform a Datacopy command in a HBR.
Data source are partitioned with a transparent partition.
This datacopy do not work. The HBR is really fast but when I retrieve data no data are copied.
I am wondering if this is possible to perform a datacopy command, in a HBR with partitioned data source.
I have managed to perform this datacopy throw a HBR using the command:
SET CREATEBLOCKONEQ
Target = Source;
But this method is really long.
Thanks for your answer,
Arthur.

Hi
Make sure that you have relevant Role & Authorization at Quality/PRS.
You have to Transport the Source Cube first and then Create a Generate Export Data Source in QAS. Then, replicate data sources for BW QAS Soruce System. Make sure this replicated Data Source in QAS. Only then can transport new update rules for second cube.
Hope it helps and clear

Troubles editing tables with partitions

I'm running SQL Developer 1.5.3 against Oracle 10/11 databases and SQL Developer has trouble with my partitioned tables. Both the schema owner and sys users experience the same problems.
The first time I try to edit a table, I get an "Error Loading Objects" dialog with a NullPointException message. If I immediately turn around and try to edit the table again, I get the Edit Table dialog. That's annoying but there's at least a work-around.
Next, if I select the Indexes pane, I can view the first index but selecting another one results in an "Index Error on <table>" error dialog. The message is "There are no table partitions on which to define local index partitions". At this point, selecting any of the other panes (Columns, Primary Key, etc.) results in the same dialog. While the main Partitions tab shows my partitions, I cannot see them in the Edit Table dialog. In fact, the Partition Definitions and Subpartition Templates panes are blank.
Does anyone else see this behavior? Version 1.5.1 behaved the same way so it's not new.
Of course I've figured out how to do everything I need through SQL but it would be handy if I could just use the tool.
Thank you.

Most of my tables are generated from a script so this morning I decided to just create a very basic partitioned table. It contained a NUMBER primary key and a TIMESTAMP(6) column to use with partitioning. That table worked just fine in SQL Developer.
At that point I tried to figure out what is different about my tables and I finally found the difference... Oracle Spatial. If I add an MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY column to my partitioned table, SQL Developer starts having issues.
I also have the GeoRaptor plugin installed so I had to wonder if it was interfering with SQL Developer. I couldn't find an option to uninstall an extension so I went into the sqldeveloper/extensions directory and removed GeoRaptorLibs and org.GeoRaptor.jar. GeoRaptor doesn't appear to be installed in SQL Developer anymore but I still see the same behavior.
It appears that there is an issue in SQL Developer with Oracle Spatial and partitioning. Can someone confirm this?

Is Forms 10g compatible with Oracle database 8.1.7.4.0 ?

Hello Folks,
Is Forms 10g compatible with Oracle database 8.1.7.4.0 ?
Thank You
Anna

There shouldn't be problems. [url https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/f?p=130:14:3453894956402291720::::p14_database_id,p14_docid,p14_show_header,p14_show_help,p14_black_frame,p14_font:NOT,207303.1,1,1,1,helvetica]Metalink Note:207303.1

Insert performance issue with Partitioned Table.....

Hi All,
I have a performance issue during with a table which is partitioned. without table being partitioned
it ran in less time but after partition it took more than double.
1) The table was created initially without any partition and the below insert took only 27 minuts.
Total Rec Inserted :- 2424233
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Elapsed: 00:27:35.20
2) Now I re-created the table with partition(range yearly - below) and the same insert took 59 minuts.
Is there anyway i can achive the better performance during insert on this partitioned table?
[ similerly, I have another table with 50 Million records and the insert took 10 hrs without partition.
with partitioning the table, it took 18 hours... ]
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 4195045590
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 643K| 34M| | 12917 (3)| 00:02:36 |
|* 1 | HASH JOIN | | 643K| 34M| 2112K| 12917 (3)| 00:02:36 |
| 2 | VIEW | index$_join$_001 | 69534 | 1290K| | 529 (3)| 00:00:07 |
|* 3 | HASH JOIN | | | | | | |
| 4 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| PK_ACCOUNT_MASTER_BASE | 69534 | 1290K| | 181 (3)| 00:00
| 5 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| ACCOUNT_MASTER_BASE_IDX2 | 69534 | 1290K| | 474 (2)| 00:00
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TB_SISADMIN_BALANCE | 2424K| 87M| | 6413 (4)| 00:01:17 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
1 - access("A"."VENDOR_ACCT_NBR"=SUBSTR("B"."ACCOUNT_NO",1,8) AND
"A"."VENDOR_CD"="B"."COMPANY_NO")
3 - access(ROWID=ROWID)
Open C1;
Loop
Fetch C1 Bulk Collect Into C_Rectype Limit 10000;
Forall I In 1..C_Rectype.Count
Insert test
     col1,col2,col3)
Values
     val1, val2,val3);
V_Rec := V_Rec + Nvl(C_Rectype.Count,0);
Commit;
Exit When C_Rectype.Count = 0;
C_Rectype.delete;
End Loop;
End;
Total Rec Inserted :- 2424233
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Elapsed: 00:51:01.22
Edited by: user520824 on Jul 16, 2010 9:16 AM

I'm concerned about the view in step 2 and the index join in step 3. A composite index with both columns might eliminate the index join and result in fewer read operations.
If you know which partition the data is going into beforehand you can save a little bit of processing by specifying the partition (which may not be a scalable long-term solution) in the insert - I'm not 100% sure you can do this on inserts but I know you can on selects.
The APPEND hint won't help the way you are using it - the VALUES clause in an insert makes it be ignored. Where it is effective and should help you is if you can do the insert in one query - insert into/select from. If you are using the loop to avoid filling up undo/rollback you can use a bulk collect to batch the selects and commit accordingly - but don't commit more often than you have to because more frequent commits slow transactions down.
I don't think there is a nologging hint :)
So, try something like
insert /*+ hints */ into ...
Select
     A.Ing_Acct_Nbr, currency_Symbol,
     Balance_Date,     Company_No,
     Substr(Account_No,1,8) Account_No,
     Substr(Account_No,9,1) Typ_Cd ,
     Substr(Account_No,10,1) Chk_Cd,
     Td_Balance,     Sd_Balance,
     Sysdate,     'Sisadmin'
From Ideaal_Cons.Tb_Account_Master_Base A,
     Ideaal_Staging.Tb_Sisadmin_Balance B
Where A.Vendor_Acct_Nbr = Substr(B.Account_No,1,8)
   And A.Vendor_Cd = b.company_no
      ;Edited by: riedelme on Jul 16, 2010 7:42 AM

Problems with partition tables

Hi all,
I've got some problems with partition tables. The script at the bottom run but when I wanna insert some values it returns me an error
(ORA-06550: line 1, column 30: PL/SQL: ORA-06552: PL/SQL: Compilation unit analysis terminated
ORA-06553: PLS-320: the declaration of the type of this expression is incomplete or malformed
ORA-06550: line 1, column 7: PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored)
and I can't understand why!
There's something incorrect in the script or not?
Please help me
Thanks in advance
Steve
CREATE TABLE TW_E_CUSTOMER_UNIFIED
ID_CUSTOMER_UNIFIED VARCHAR2 (27) NOT NULL ,
START_VALIDITY_DATE DATE NOT NULL ,
END_VALIDITY_DATE DATE ,
CUSTOMER_STATUS VARCHAR2 (255)
PARTITION BY RANGE (START_VALIDITY_DATE)
SUBPARTITION BY LIST (END_VALIDITY_DATE)
PARTITION M200909 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20091001','YYYYMMDD'))
(SUBPARTITION M200909_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M200909_NN VALUES (DEFAULT)),
PARTITION M200910 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20091101','YYYYMMDD'))
(SUBPARTITION M200910_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M200910_NN VALUES (DEFAULT)),
PARTITION M200911 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20091201','YYYYMMDD'))
(SUBPARTITION M200911_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M200911_NN VALUES (DEFAULT)),
PARTITION M200912 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20100101','YYYYMMDD'))
(SUBPARTITION M200912_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M200912_NN VALUES (DEFAULT)),
PARTITION M201001 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20100201','YYYYMMDD'))
(SUBPARTITION M201001_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M201001_NN VALUES (DEFAULT)),
PARTITION M201002 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20100301','YYYYMMDD'))
(SUBPARTITION M201002_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M201002_NN VALUES (DEFAULT)),
PARTITION M210001 VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE))
(SUBPARTITION M210001_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M210001_NN VALUES (DEFAULT))
;

Hi Hoek,
the DB version is 10.2 (italian version, then SET is correct).
...there's something strange: now I can INSERT rows but I can't update them!
I'm using this command string:
UPDATE TW_E_CUSTOMER_UNIFIED SET END_VALIDITY_DATE = TO_DATE('09-SET-09', 'DD-MON-RR') WHERE
id_customer_unified = '123' and start_validity_date = TO_DATE('09-SET-09', 'DD-MON-RR');
And this is the error:
Error SQL: ORA-14402: updating partition key column would cause a partition change
14402. 00000 - "updating partition key column would cause a partition change"
*Cause: An UPDATE statement attempted to change the value of a partition
key column causing migration of the row to another partition
*Action: Do not attempt to update a partition key column or make sure that
the new partition key is within the range containing the old
partition key.
I think that is impossible to use a PARTITION/SUBPARTITION like that: in fact the update of "END_VALIDITY_DATE" cause a partition change.
Do u agree or it's possible an update on a field that implies a partition change?
Regards Steve

Problems Faced with Partitions in Oracle 9i.

I have a doubt regarding the partitions in Oracle 9i can you please help me regarding this?
Create table t1
( x number,
y number,
z number);
insert into t1 values (1,1,1);
insert into t1 values (2,2,2);
insert into t1 values (3,3,3);
Create table t2
x number,
y number,
z number
partition by range(x)
partition p1 values less than(2),
partition p2 values less than(3),
partition p3 values less than(4),
partition p4 values less than(maxvalue)
alter table t2 exchange partition p1 with table t1;
SQL> alter table t2 exchange partition p1 with table t1;
alter table t2 exchange partition p1 with table t1
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-14099: all rows in table do not qualify for specified partition
WHAT DOES THIS ERROR MESSAGE MEAN? I AM NOT ABLE TO UNDERSTAND THIS? WHAT NEED's TO BE DONE TO RESOLVE THIS?
alter table t2 exchange partition p1 with table t1 WITHOUT VALIDATION;
SQL> SELECT * FROM T2;
X Y Z
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
SQL> SELECT * FROM T2 PARTITION(P1);
X Y Z
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
SQL> SELECT * FROM T2 PARTITION(P2);
no rows selected
SQL> SELECT * FROM T2 PARTITION(P3);
no rows selected
(i) Why i am facing this error ORA-14099: while partitioning? Can you please brief me about this ?
(ii) why there is not data's in the PARTITIONS p2 &p3 after the partitions is exchanged WITHOUT VALIDATION options?
what is going with this method?
(iii) Also can you please explain me with an example how to partitions a table having milliion of records with EXCHANGE PARTITION Options with MULITPLE partition segment's (say partition based on status id column with 6 differnt values i am thinking to use list partitions using status_id as partition key) ?
Also i have tried the below approch is this a right approch? please correct me if i am wrong.
Create table t1
( x number,
y number,
z number);
insert into t1 values (1,1,1);
insert into t1 values (2,2,2);
insert into t1 values (3,3,3);
commit;
Create table t2
x number,
y number,
z number
partition by range(x)
partition p1 values less than(2),
partition p2 values less than(3),
partition p3 values less than(4),
partition p4 values less than(maxvalue)
SQL> insert into t2 select * from t1;
3 rows created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> SELECT * FROM T2 PARTITION(P1);
X Y Z
1 1 1
SQL> SELECT * FROM T2 PARTITION(P2);
X Y Z
2 2 2
SQL> SELECT * FROM T2 PARTITION(P3);
X Y Z
3 3 3
SQL> SELECT * FROM T2 PARTITION(P4);
no rows selected
EXPLAIN PLAN
FOR SELECT * FROM T2 WHERE X = 1
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost | Pstart| Pstop |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 9 | 2 | | |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | T2 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Now my question is what is problem instead of using EXCHANGE PARTITION why caun't we follow this above approch?
to partition a non-partitioned table?
Thanks,
Rajesh.

The value of 3 should obviously should go into the partition P3.Then why are you putting it into p1?
Your command,
<tt> alter table t2 exchange partition <b>p1</b> with table t1;</tt>
will swap partition p1 with the contents of table t1, leaving you with partition p1 containing the three values that were in t1. At first it told you there were rows in t1 that did not belong in that partition, but you used FORCE so it put them in anyway.
btw there are notes in the FAQ about how to use ** tags to format your posts.
~Edited by: William Robertson on Oct 15, 2008 6:49 AM~

Using ASSM in 10g RAC with SAP

Hi,
It is recommended to use ASSM (Automatic Segment Space Management) with using 10g RAC with SAP. Our deployment is currently a single instance database that is not using ASSM. We plan to convert this single instance database to a 10g RAC database. I wanted to know what the supported method is to convert to ASSM, during this process.
Will it require an export and import of the database?
Thanks

Hi Badar,
of course you can move tables (w/o longs) via ALTER TABLE MOVE... but why do you may want to do that?
ALTER TABLE MOVE is an OFFLINE action - nobody can access the table during the move.
DBMS_REDEFINITION (used by the BRTOOLS) is ONLINE. Normal work can proceed while the data is copied.
With ALTER TABLE MOVE you've to touch every single table (ca 50.000-80.000 in a SAP installation) by hand. PLUS you've to rebuild each index on each table by hand.
The BRTOOLS do all that for you. In parallel if you want to.
Moreover the BRTOOLS provide extensive logging in case any error should occur. ALTER TABLE MOVE does not.
So better forget about ALTER TABLE MOVE... use the BRTOOLS - they are not that bad
best regards,
Lars

10G EE with Partitioning

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for