2K8 - Best practice for setting the DNS server list on a DC/DNS server for an interface

We have been referencing the article 
"DNS: DNS servers on <adapter name> should include their own IP addresses on their interface lists of DNS servers"
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd378900%28WS.10%29.aspx but there are some parts that are a bit confusing.  In particular is this statement
"The inclusion of its own IP address in the list of DNS servers improves performance and increases availability of DNS servers. However, if the DNS server is also a domain
controller and it points only to itself for name resolution, it can become an island and fail to replicate with other domain controllers. For this reason, use caution when configuring the loopback address on an adapter if the server is also a domain controller.
The loopback address should be configured only as a secondary or tertiary DNS server on a domain controller.”
The paragraph switches from using the term "its own IP address" to "loopback" address.  This is confusing becasuse technically they are not the same.  Loppback addresses are 127.0.0.1 through 127.255.255.255. The resolution section then
goes on and adds the "loopback address" 127.0.0.1 to the list of DNS servers for each interface.
In the past we always setup DCs to use their own IP address as the primary DNS server, not 127.0.0.1.  Based on my experience and reading the article I am under the impression we could use the following setup.
Primary DNS:  Locally assigned IP of the DC (i.e. 192.168.1.5)
Secondary DNS: The assigned IP of another DC (i.e. 192.168.1.6)
Tertiary DNS:  127.0.0.1
I guess the secondary and tertiary addresses could be swapped based on the article.  Is there a document that provides clearer guidance on how to setup the DNS server list properly on Windows 2008 R2 DC/DNS servers?  I have seen some other discussions
that talk about the pros and cons of using another DC/DNS as the Primary.  MS should have clear guidance on this somewhere.

Actually, my suggestion, which seems to be the mostly agreed method, is:
Primary DNS:  Locally assigned IP of the DC (i.e. 192.168.1.5)
Secondary DNS: The assigned IP of another DC (i.e. 192.168.1.6)
Tertiary DNS:  empty
The tertiary more than likely won't be hit, (besides it being superfluous and the list will reset back to the first one) due to the client side resolver algorithm time out process, as I mentioned earlier. Here's a full explanation on how
it works and why:
This article discusses:
WINS NetBIOS, Browser Service, Disabling NetBIOS, & Direct Hosted SMB (DirectSMB).
The DNS Client Side Resolver algorithm.
If one DC or DNS goes down, does a client logon to another DC?
DNS Forwarders Algorithm and multiple DNS addresses (if you've configured more than one forwarders)
Client side resolution process chart
http://msmvps.com/blogs/acefekay/archive/2009/11/29/dns-wins-netbios-amp-the-client-side-resolver-browser-service-disabling-netbios-direct-hosted-smb-directsmb-if-one-dc-is-down-does-a-client-
logon-to-another-dc-and-dns-forwarders-algorithm.aspx
DNS
Client side resolver service
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc779517.aspx 
The DNS Client Service Does Not Revert to Using the First Server in the List in Windows XP
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/320760
Ace Fekay
MVP, MCT, MCITP EA, MCTS Windows 2008 & Exchange 2007 & Exchange 2010, Exchange 2010 Enterprise Administrator, MCSE & MCSA 2003/2000, MCSA Messaging 2003
Microsoft Certified Trainer
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
Complete List of Technical Blogs: http://www.delawarecountycomputerconsulting.com/technicalblogs.php
This posting is provided AS-IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.
I agree with this proposed solution as well:
Primary DNS:  Locally assigned IP of the DC (i.e. 192.168.1.5)
Secondary DNS: The assigned IP of another DC (i.e. 192.168.1.6)
Tertiary DNS:  empty
One thing to note, in this configuration the Best Practice Analyzer will throw the error:
The network adapter Local Area Connection 2 does not list the loopback IP address as a DNS server, or it is configured as the first entry.
Even if you add the loopback address as a Tertiary DNS address the error will still appear. The only way I've seen this error eliminated is to add the loopback address as the second entry in DNS, so:
Primary DNS:  The assigned IP of another DC (i.e. 192.168.1.6)
Secondary DNS: 127.0.0.1
Tertiary DNS:  empty
I'm not comfortable not having the local DC/DNS address listed so I'm going with the solution Ace offers.
Opinion?

Similar Messages

  • Any best practices for secondary interface/IP

    Hello,
    I am working for translate firewall from to ASA now.  As I know ASA did not support secondary interface IP. 
    However, my existing firewall setup is using this method to bind different subnet into single Interface. 
    Did any best practices to migrate into ASA environment?
    Thanks!

    Hi,
    This depends on your current environment which we dont know about.
    As ASA firewalls can not have secondary IP addresses on a single interface then the typical options would be to either
    Move the gateway of these internal subnets (which need to be under the same interface) to an internal L3 switch or Router. Then configure a link network between that device and the ASA interface and route the subnets through that link subnet.
    Configure the subnets to different ASA interface (actual physical interfaces or subinterface if using Trunking) and separate those subnets to different Vlans on your switch network (or if not using Vlans then simply to different switches)
    I guess it would also be possible to have 2 separate physical ASA interfaces connected to the same network switch network (Vlan) where the 2 subnet are used and just configure the other gateway on the other interface and the other subnet on the other physical interface. I would assume it could work but I am really hesitant to even write this as this would certainly be something that I would not even consider unless in some really urgent situation where there was no other options (for some reason).
    - Jouni

  • (Request for:) Best practices for setting up a new Windows Server 2012 r2 Hyper-V Virtualized AD DC

    Could you please share your best practices for setting up a new Windows Server 2012 r2 Hyper-V Virtualized AD DC, that will be running on a new WinSrv 2012 r2 host server.   (This
    will be for a brand new network setup, new forest, domain, etc.)
    Specifically, your best practices regarding:
    the sizing of non virtual and virtual volumes/partitions/drives,  
    the use of sysvol, logs, & data volumes/drives on hosts & guests,
    RAID levels for the host and the guest(s),  
    IDE vs SCSI and drivers both non virtual and virtual and the booting there of,  
    disk caching settings on both host and guests.  
    Thanks so much for any information you can share.

    A bit of non essential additional info:
    We are small to midrange school district who, after close to 20 years on Novell networks, have decided to design and create a new Microsoft network and migrate all of our data and services
    over to the new infrastructure .   We are planning on rolling out 2012 r2 servers with as much Hyper-v virtualization as possible.
    During the last few weeks we have been able to find most of the information we need to undergo this project, and most of the information was pretty solid with little ambiguity, except for
    information regarding virtualizing the DCs, which as been a bit inconsistent.
    Yes, we have read all the documents that most of these posts tend point to, but found some, if not most are still are referring to performing this under Srvr 2008 r2, and haven’t really
    seen all that much on Srvr2012 r2.
    We have read these and others:
    Introduction to Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) Virtualization (Level 100), 
    Virtualized Domain Controller Technical Reference (Level 300),
    Virtualized Domain Controller Cloning Test Guidance for Application Vendors,
    Support for using Hyper-V Replica for virtualized domain controllers.
    Again, thanks for any information, best practices, cookie cutter or otherwise that you can share.
    Chas.

  • What is the best practice for setting up warehouse inventory for oil & gas tank farm

    Hi, i want to know the best practice for setting up warehouse inventory for oil & gas tank farm. SAP has these levels for inventory management in warehouse environment: warehouse-aisle-shelf-bin. To me the bin seems to be the central location for inventory. So do i set up each oil tank as a bin location?

    Hi,
    Please refer below link:
    https://help.sap.com/saphelp_sbo900/helpdata/EN/ad/4f233a7b864c7cbe2b57ad09246adb/content.htm
    SAP Business One 9.0 Training - Feb 6, 2013 - Warehouse Bins - YouTube
    Thanks & Regards,
    Nagarajan

  • Best practice for the Update of SAP GRC CC Rule Set

    Hi GRC experts,
    We have in a CC production system a SoD matrix that we would like to modified extensively. Basically by activating many permissions.
    Which is a best practice for accomplish our goal?
    Many thanks in advance. Best regards,
      Imanol

    Hi Simon and Amir
    My name is Connie and I work at Accenture GRC practice (and a colleague of Imanolu2019s). I have been reading this thread and I would like to ask you a question that is related to this topic. We have a case where a Global Rule Set u201CLogic Systemu201D and we may also require to create a Specific Rule Set. Is there a document (from SAP or from best practices) that indicate the potential impact (regarding risk analysis, system performance, process execution time, etc) caused by implementing both type of rule sets in a production environment? Are there any special considerations to be aware? Have you ever implemented this type of scenario?
    I would really appreciate your help and if you could point me to specific documentation could be of great assistance. Thanks in advance and best regards,
    Connie

  • What is the Best Practice for Server Pool...

    hi,
    wht is the Best Practice for having server pool i.e
    1) having a single large serverpool consisting of "n" number of guest vm
    2) having a multiple small serverpool consisting of less of number of guest vm
    please suggest.....

    Raja Kondar wrote:
    wht is the Best Practice for having server pool i.e
    1) having a single large serverpool consisting of "n" number of guest vm
    2) having a multiple small serverpool consisting of less of number of guest vm I prefer option 1, as this gives me the greatest amount of resources available. I don't have to worry about resources in smaller pools. It also means there are more resources across the pool for HA purposes. Not sure if this is Official Best Practice, but it is a simpler configuration.
    Keep in mind that a server pool should probably have up to 20 servers in it: OCFS2 starts to strain after that.

  • Best practice for server configuration for iTunes U

    Hello all, I'm completely new to iTunes U, never heard of this until now and we have zero documentation on how to set it up. I was given the task to look at best practice for setting up the server for iTunes U, and I need your help.
    *My first question*: Can anyone explains to me how iTunes U works in general? My brief understanding is that you design/setup a welcome page for your school with sub categories like programs/courses, and within that you have things like lecture audio/video files and students can download/view them on iTunes. So where are these files hosted? Is it on your own server or is it on Apple's server? Where & how do you manage the content?
    *2nd question:* We have two Xserve(s) sitting in our server room ready to roll, my question is what is the best method to configure them so it meets our need of "high availability in active/active mode, load balancing, and server scaling". Originally I was thinking about using a 3rd party load balancing device to meet these needs, but I was told there is no budget for it so this is not going to happen. I know there is IP Failover but one server has to sit in standby mode which is a waste. So the most likely scenario is to setup DNS round robin and put both xserves in active/active. My question now is (this maybe related to question 1), say that all the content data like audio/video files are stored by us, (We are going to link a portion of our SAN space to Xserve for storage), if we are going with DNS round robin and put the 2 servers in Active/Active mode, can both servers access a common shared network space? or is this not possible and each server must have its own storage space? And therefore I must use something like RSYNC to make sure contents on both servers are identical? Should I use XSAN or is RSYNC good enough?
    Since I have no experience with iTunes U whatsoever, I hope you understand my questions, any advice and suggestion are most welcome, thanks!

    Raja Kondar wrote:
    wht is the Best Practice for having server pool i.e
    1) having a single large serverpool consisting of "n" number of guest vm
    2) having a multiple small serverpool consisting of less of number of guest vm I prefer option 1, as this gives me the greatest amount of resources available. I don't have to worry about resources in smaller pools. It also means there are more resources across the pool for HA purposes. Not sure if this is Official Best Practice, but it is a simpler configuration.
    Keep in mind that a server pool should probably have up to 20 servers in it: OCFS2 starts to strain after that.

  • Best practice for licence server for RDS Farm & Certificate errors

    Hello,
    I am in the process of creating an RDS farm using Server 2008 R2.  I have three Session Hosts and a Connection Broker.
    I have a set of 10 user CALs available and also another 20 on our current RDS server which will need migrating once we go live with the farm.
    I understand the User CALs need to be installed on another Server 2008 R2 and I am wondering what is best practice.  We are running on an entirely virtual environment and it would be simple enough to create another server and install the CALs on there. 
    The only issue with that is that I would need to create a replica of this new machine for DR purposes, but this would take up valuable space which may not be necessary.
    We are planning on creating replicas of one of the Session hosts and the broker for DR, so I am guessing I would need to install some CALs on the Session Host which is going to be replicated.
    There are a few options and I am just wondering what is the best way to go about things.
    Also, as an aside, I am getting an annoying certificate error each time I log a test user onto the RDS farm - I think this is because I am using the DNS alias of the RDS Farm to log on. Is there an easy way to get around this, other than the 'Do not show
    this message again'. I have been doing some research and the world of Certificates is very confusing!!
    Thanks,
    Caroline
    C.Rafferty

    Hi Caroline,
    Firstly for your License related issue, you can perform the step on any VM or can create the new VM as replica for RDSH server also. But please be sure that you have installed RD License server on it, activate it and then install RDS CAL on it. But be safe
    if possible don’t install RD License server with RDCB, please make that out of it as little away. As you can also install RD License server with AD or make replica of that and install RDL on that.
    Best practices for setting up Remote Desktop Licensing (Terminal Server Licensing) across Active Directory Domains/Forests or Workgroup
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2473823
    What’s the specified certificate error which you are receiving?
    If you're going to allow users to connect externally and they will not be part of your domain, you would need to deploy certificates from a public CA. In meantime you can refer blog for getting insight for certificate case.
    Certificate Requirements for Windows 2008 R2 and Windows 2012 Remote Desktop Services
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/askperf/archive/2014/01/24/certificate-requirements-for-windows-2008-r2-and-windows-2012-remote-desktop-services.aspx
    Hope it helps!
    Thanks.
    Dharmesh Solanki
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

  • DNS best practices for hub and spoke AD Architecture?

    I have an Active Directory Forest with a forest root such as joe.co and the root domain of the same name, and root DNS servers (Domain Controllers) dns1.joe.co and dns2.joe.co
    I have child domains with names in the form region1.joe.com, region2.joe.co and so on, with dns servers dns1.region1.joe.co and so on.
    Each region has distribute offices that may have a DC in them, servers named in the form dns1branch1.region1.joe.co
    Over all my DNS tests out okay, but I want to get the general guidelines for setting up new DCs correct.
    Configuration:
    Root DC/DNS server dns1.joe.co adapter settings points DNS to itself, then two other root domain DNS/DCs dns2.joe.co and dns3.joe.co.
    The other root domain DNS/DCs adapter settings point to root server dns1.joe.co and then to itself dns2.joe.co, and then 127.0.0.1
    The regional domains have a root dns server dns1.region1.joe.co with adapter that that points to root server dns1.joe.co then to itself.
    The additional region domain DNS/DCs adapter settings point to dns1.region1.joe.co then to itself then to dn1.joe.co
    What would you do to correct this topology (and settings) or improve it?
    Thanks in advance
    just david

    Hi,
    According to your description, my understanding is that you need suggestion about your DNS topology.
    In theory, there is no obvious problem. Except for the namespace and server plaining for DNS, zone is also needed to consideration. If you place DNS server on each domain and subdomain, confirm that if the traffic browsed by DNS will affect the network performance.
    Besides, fault tolerance and security are also necessary.
    We usually recommend that:
    DC with DNS should point to another DNS server as primary and itself as secondary or tertiary. It should not point to self as primary due to various DNS islanding and performance issues that can occur. And when referencing a DNS server on itself, a DNS client
    should always use a loopback address and not a real IP address. detailed information you may reference:
    What is Microsoft's best practice for where and how many DNS servers exist? What about for configuring DNS client settings on DC’s and members?
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2010/07/17/friday-mail-sack-saturday-edition.aspx#dnsbest
    How To Split and Migrate Child Domain DNS Records To a Dedicated DNS Zone
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/askpfeplat/archive/2013/12/02/how-to-split-and-migrate-child-domain-dns-records-to-a-dedicated-dns-zone.aspx
    Best Regards,
    Eve Wang
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

  • Best practices for 2 x DNS servers with 2 x sites

    I am curious if someone can help me with best practices for my DNS servers.  Let me give my network layout first.
    I have 1 site with 2 x Windows 2012 Servers (1 GUI - 10.0.0.7, the other CORE - 10.0.0.8) the 2nd site connected via VPN has 2 x Windows 2012R2 Servers (1 GUI - 10.2.0.7, the other CORE - 10.2.0.8)  All 4 servers are promoted to DC's and have DNS services
    running.
    Here goes my questions:
    Site #1
    DC-01 - NIC IP address for DNS server #1 set to 10.0.0.8, DNS server #2 set to 127.0.0.1 (should I add my 2nd sites DNS servers under Advanced as well? 10.2.0.7 & 10.2.0.8)
    DC-02 - NIC IP address for DNS server #1 set to 10.0.0.7, DNS server #2 set to 127.0.0.1 (should I add my 2nd sites DNS servers under Advanced as well? 10.2.0.7 & 10.2.0.8)
    Site #2
    DC-01 - NIC IP address for DNS server #1 set to 10.2.0.8, DNS server #2 set to 127.0.0.1 (should I add my 2nd sites DNS servers under Advanced as well? 10.0.0.7 & 10.0.0.8)
    DC-02 - NIC IP address for DNS server #1 set to 10.2.0.7, DNS server #2 set to 127.0.0.1 (should I add my 2nd sites DNS servers under Advanced as well? 10.0.0.7 & 10.0.0.8)
    Under the DNS management > Forward Lookup Zones > _msdcs.mydomain.local
    > properties > Name Servers should I have all of my other DNS servers, or should I have my WAN DNS servers? In a single server scenario I always put my WAN DNS server but a bit unsure in this scenario. 
    Under the DNS management > Forward Lookup Zones > _msdcs.mydomain.local > properties > General > Type should all servers be set to
    Active Directory - Integrated > Primary Zone? Should any of these be set to
    Secondary Zone?
    Under the DNS management > Forward Lookup Zones > _msdcs.mydomain.local > properties > Zone Transfers should I allow zone transfers?
    Would the following questions be identical to the Forward Lookup Zone mydomain.local as well?

    I am curious if someone can help me with best practices for my DNS servers.  Let me give my network layout first.
    I have 1 site with 2 x Windows 2012 Servers (1 GUI - 10.0.0.7, the other CORE - 10.0.0.8) the 2nd site connected via VPN has 2 x Windows 2012R2 Servers (1 GUI - 10.2.0.7, the other CORE - 10.2.0.8)  All 4 servers are promoted to DC's and have DNS services
    running.
    Here goes my questions:
    Site #1
    DC-01 - NIC IP address for DNS server #1 set to 10.0.0.8, DNS server #2 set to 127.0.0.1 (should I add my 2nd sites DNS servers under Advanced as well? 10.2.0.7 & 10.2.0.8)
    DC-02 - NIC IP address for DNS server #1 set to 10.0.0.7, DNS server #2 set to 127.0.0.1 (should I add my 2nd sites DNS servers under Advanced as well? 10.2.0.7 & 10.2.0.8)
    Site #2
    DC-01 - NIC IP address for DNS server #1 set to 10.2.0.8, DNS server #2 set to 127.0.0.1 (should I add my 2nd sites DNS servers under Advanced as well? 10.0.0.7 & 10.0.0.8)
    DC-02 - NIC IP address for DNS server #1 set to 10.2.0.7, DNS server #2 set to 127.0.0.1 (should I add my 2nd sites DNS servers under Advanced as well? 10.0.0.7 & 10.0.0.8)
    Under the DNS management > Forward Lookup Zones > _msdcs.mydomain.local
    > properties > Name Servers should I have all of my other DNS servers, or should I have my WAN DNS servers? In a single server scenario I always put my WAN DNS server but a bit unsure in this scenario. 
    Under the DNS management > Forward Lookup Zones > _msdcs.mydomain.local > properties > General > Type should all servers be set to
    Active Directory - Integrated > Primary Zone? Should any of these be set to
    Secondary Zone?
    Under the DNS management > Forward Lookup Zones > _msdcs.mydomain.local > properties > Zone Transfers should I allow zone transfers?
    Would the following questions be identical to the Forward Lookup Zone mydomain.local as well?
    Site1
    DC1: Primary 10.0.0.7. Secondary 10.0.0.8. Tertiary 127.0.0.1
    DC2: Primary 10.0.0.8.  Secondary 10.0.0.7. Tertiary 127.0.0.1
    Site2
    DC1: Primary 10.2.0.7.  Secondary 10.2.0.8. Tertiary 127.0.0.1
    DC2: Primary 10.2.0.8.  Secondary 10.2.0.7. Tertiary 127.0.0.1
    The DC's should automatically register in msdcs.  Do not register external DNS servers in msdcs or it will lead to issues. Yes, I recommend all zones to be set to AD-integrated. No need to allow zone transfers as AD replication will take care
    of this for you.  Same for mydomain.local.
    Hope this helps.  

  • Best Practices for Setting up a Windows 2012 R2 STD Domain Controller in a Remote Site

    So I'm looking for an article or writeup similar to the "Adding Domain Controllers in Remote Sites" TechNet article but for Windows Server 2012 STD R2.  Here is my scenario:
    1.  I want to setup the domain controller at Site A where the primary domain controller is located.  The primary domain controller is Windows Server 2008 R2. 
    2.  Once the DC is setup I plan on leaving it on our network for a few days before shipping it to remote Site B for installation
    Other key items:
    1.  The remote Site B will have a different IP range than Site A but will be connected to Site A via a single VPN tunnel.  All the DCs that replicate with each other are on the same domain. 
    2.  The 2012 DC that I setup for Site B (same domain in same forest) will be a DHCP, DNS, and WSUS server all replicating to the primary DC at Site A
    Questions:
    1.  What items can I setup while it's at Site A without effecting or conflicting with the existing network and domain controller?  Can I setup a scope once the DHCP role is added? 
    2.  All of our DCs replicate through Sites and Services, do I have to manually add this to our primary DC for the new DC going to remote Site B?  Or when does this happen automatically when I promote the DC? 
    All and all I'm just looking for a list of Best Practices for 2012 or a Step by Step Guide.  Any help would be appreciated. 

    Hi,
    Thanks for your posting.
    When you install AD DS in the hub or staging site, disconnect the installed domain controller, and then ship the computer to the remote site, you are disconnecting a viable domain controller from the replication topology.
    For more and detail information, please refer to:
    Best Practices for Adding Domain Controllers in Remote Sites
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc794962(v=ws.10).aspx
    Regards.
    Vivian Wang

  • Best practiceS for setting up Macs on Network

    Greetings.
    We have six Macs on our Windows Server network; three iMacs and three laptops. We have set up all the machines and they are joined to the Active Directory. In the past, we have always created local users on the machines and then "browsed" to the server shares and mounted the them. We've learned things have improved/changed over the years and we're just now realizing we can probably have the machines set up to work better. So, I have a couple of questions for "best practices" when setting up each of the machines.
    1. Since we’re in a network environment, should we not set up “local logins/users” and instead have users login using their AD login? It seems having a local account creates some conflicts with the server since upgrading to lion.
    2. Should we set the computer to not ask for a “list of users” and instead ask for a username and password for logins?
    3. For the user that uses the machine most often, they can still customize their desktop when they use an AD login, correct?
    4. Should we set up Mobile User Accounts? What exactly does this do?
    Any other advice on how we should best be setting up the clients for our environment to make sure we are following best practices would be great!
    Thanks for any help!
    Jay

    Greetings.
    We have six Macs on our Windows Server network; three iMacs and three laptops. We have set up all the machines and they are joined to the Active Directory. In the past, we have always created local users on the machines and then "browsed" to the server shares and mounted the them. We've learned things have improved/changed over the years and we're just now realizing we can probably have the machines set up to work better. So, I have a couple of questions for "best practices" when setting up each of the machines.
    1. Since we’re in a network environment, should we not set up “local logins/users” and instead have users login using their AD login? It seems having a local account creates some conflicts with the server since upgrading to lion.
    2. Should we set the computer to not ask for a “list of users” and instead ask for a username and password for logins?
    3. For the user that uses the machine most often, they can still customize their desktop when they use an AD login, correct?
    4. Should we set up Mobile User Accounts? What exactly does this do?
    Any other advice on how we should best be setting up the clients for our environment to make sure we are following best practices would be great!
    Thanks for any help!
    Jay

  • Best practices for Edit Proxies in Final Cut Server?

    We just bought Final Cut Server, and for the most part are pretty happy with the product. We are a small production facility, and primarily work with DVCPro HD footage at 720P. One feature we'd like to use would be the edit proxies feature in FCS, but they don't seem to be working for us.
    _Hosting Computer_
    We're using a mac mini server with snow leopard server and final cut server 1.5.
    Problem
    Whenever we specify in the Administrator Pane of FCS, Under Preferences and Analyze, we'd like to use a custom transcode setting for the edit proxies, keeping Frame Size, TC, and Frame rate the same, but changing the codec to h264 least quality, the effects are a different compression than expected. We tested out the compression settings using Compressor on the server, and we get the desired results:
    Input: DVCPro HD 720P Quicktime 960X720 (1248 x 702) 23.98 fps
    Output: H264 Quicktime 960X720 (1248 x 702) 23.98 fps
    Also did the same outputs using Apple Prorez, Photo Jpeg and got the following outputs:
    Output: Apple Prorez Quicktime 960X720 (1248 x 702) 23.98 fps
    Output: Photo Jpeg Quicktime 960X720 (1248 x 702) 23.98 fps
    (We also made new transcode settings for these compressor settings and we not able to control the compressions through FCS with these settings as well. Our target codec is H264.)
    After connecting the new compression settings on the Mac Mini Server to a new transcode setting in the FCS Admin Pane, we restarted the Java Client, logged in to FCS as an FCSadmin, opened the Admin Pane, and under preferences/analyze change the edit proxy setting to the New H264 setting that worked perfectly when using Compressor. After uploading a final cut project, with one associated media file (DVCPro HD 720P Quicktime 960X720 (1248 x 702) 23.98 fps), the resulting edit proxy did not match the specification: 384 x 216, 23.98fps, TC matches source.
    Also did not dynamically connect when checking out the project from FCS and selecting edit proxies and keep media with project and saving to the desktop.
    Question 1:
    Does anyone have any best practice transcode setting(s) to create for DVCPro HD 720P using edit proxies that dynamically connect and are smaller size than the original? H264? Photo Jpeg?
    Question 2:
    Why is Final Cut Server's Compressor giving a different output, when the same settings work well with just Compressor?
    Question 3:
    Does H264 work in creating dynamically linking edit proxies (ie, no need to reconnect)?
    I can imagine this information to be very useful to the community, so any input or solutions will be greatly appreciated.
    Thank you.

    H.264 is a puzzling choice of codec for edit proxies. H.264 is not an edit-friendly codec since it is a complex long-GOP structure and will require a ton of rendering just to play back the timeline. ProRES 422 Proxy would be a much better choice for editing. I'm afraid I can't account for the differences between Compressor and FCServer in this case, but my gut tells me the non-I-frame codec you are trying to use for edit proxies might have something to do with it. Maybe for an edit-proxy workflow to operate properly on the server-side the codec must be I-frame? Is there any reason you do not want to use ProRES 422 Proxy? They are about 1/3 the footprint of 720p24 DVCPRO-HD, which is already very efficient. For that frame rate and frame size they would be roughly half the heft of good ol' DV25.
    So my answer to all three questions would be to try ProRES 422 Proxy for your edit proxies and see if everything lines up.

  • What is "best practice" to set up and configure a Mac Mini server with dual 1 TB drives, using RAID 1?

    I have been handed a new, out of the box, Mac Mini server.  Has two 1 TB drives in it.  Contractor suggested RAID 1 for the set up.  I have done some research
    and found out that in creating the software RAID, this takes away the recovery partition, so I have been reading up on how to create a recovery "disk" using a thumb drive.  this part of the operation I am comfortable with, but there are other issues/concerns that I have.
    Basically, what is the "best practice" to setup the Mini, configure the RAID and then start the server.  I am assuming the steps would be something like this:
    1) start up the Mini and run through the normal Maverick setup/config - keep it plain and vanilla
    2) grab a copy of the Server app and store it offline in a safe place
    3) perform the RAID configuration / reinstall of OS X Maverick using the recovery tools
    4) copy down and start the server app
    This might be considered a very simplified version of this article (http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4886 - Mac mini server (Late 2012 and Mid 2011): How to install OS X Server on a software RAID volume), with the biggest difference being I grab a copy of the Server App off of the mini before I reinstall, since I did not purchase it from the App store, but rather it came with the mini.
    Is there a best practice /  how-to tutorial somewhere that I can follow/learn from? Am I on the right track or headed for a train wreck?
    thanks in advance

    I think this article will answer your question. Hope this helps: http://wisebyte.blogspot.com/2014/01/best-configuration-for-mac-mini-server.html

  • IronPort ESA best practice for DNS servers?

    Hello!
    Is there a best practice for what servers should be used for the Cisco IronPort DNS servers?
    Currently when I check our configuration, we have set it to "Use these DNS servers" and the first two are our domain controllers and last two are Google DNS.
    Is there a best practice way of doing this? I'm thinking of selecting the "Use the Internet's Root DNS Servers" option as I can't really see an advantage of using internal DC's.
    Thoughts?

    Best practice is to use Internet Root DNS Servers and define specific dns servers for any domain that you need to give different answers for. Since internal mail delivery is controlled by smtproutes using internal dns servers is normally not required.
    If you must use internal dns servers I recommend servers dedicated to your Ironports and not just using servers that handle enterprise lookups as well. Ironports can place a very high load on dns servers because every outside connection results in multiple dns lookups. (forward, reverse, sbrs)
    If you don't have enough dns horsepower you are susceptible to a DOS attack either through accident or design. If the Ironports overload your internal dns servers it can impact your entire enterprise.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Multiple text fields on the same line

    Hi Is it possible to have multiple text boxes on the same form line?  I'm trying to replicate a form I've created usng Acrobat X Pro but can't seem to figure how to do it with FormsCentral? Apologise if I'm missing something obvious!

  • Can I get a virus on my iPod touch?

    my family has a Mac and my sister has an apple laptop and we just found out that we have a virus some how coming through to our wifi box. no one knows that I am using the wifi on my iPod touch but I wanted to know if I can get a virus on my iPod/ if

  • Partitioning Disk and Backing up!

    Hello I have had my PB for over a couple of months and I couldn't be happier, except for not being able to run some applications that are windows only. I have a PC at home (That i will change as soon as I have money to) and I have a partitioned disk

  • Setting Dotmac as the Screen Saver

    I been trying to set my screen saver to use dotmac as the screen saver, but I cannot get it to work. I get the following message when I test the screen saver. "Your selected subscriptions have no pictures. You can change your subscriptions by clinkin

  • Scanning for a newly plugged in MIDI device

    Hi all, I'm currently using javax.sound.midi in my project and I have to implement a feature where the program detects if the user plugs in a new midi device during runtime. This is a bit of a problem as mentioned here: http://stackoverflow.com/quest