Accouting Key and Accurals

Dear All,
Can any one explain me the Difference between Accouting Key and Accurals
Thanks
Tiru

The Accruals will be posted to the G/L account which is maintianed against the account key ERU and the rebate (deduction) will be posted against the G/L account maintianed for accounting key ERB.
Manual Accruals:
Posting accruals manually can be useful in different situations such as: Lump sum payments , Accruals correction.
You can control at which time and for which amount the accruals should be posted.
To post accruals manually:
Select Logistics --> S&D --> Master data -->Agreements --> Rebate agreement -->Change. Enter the number of the rebate agreement or determine the number by selecting a matchcode.
Press ENTER. Goto -->Manual accruals (overview screen)
Enter the accruals to be posted in the field beside each rebate condition record as follows: negative amount: to build accruals, positive amount: to reverse accruals
It is not possible to reverse more accruals than actually exist for a condition record.
Rebate Correction:
Instead of trying to figure out the manual accrual difference, you can also use the correction document. IMG -->SD -->Billing>Rebate processing>Compare Rebate Basis And Correct Accruals. Enter the agreement number, and execute. Instead of doing a manual accrual, just click on the button, which will automatically create a B2 correction document.
PS: Award pts if helps

Similar Messages

Accounting Key and Accurals

Dear All,
can any one explain the difference between Accounting Key and Accurals in Pricing Procedure
Thanks,
Tiru

Hi:
You define your account keys in this menu option and allocate them to the condition types in the pricing procedures.
With the account keys, you group together similar accounts in financial accounting. Using the account key, the SAP System finds the desired G/L accounts.
The accrual keys form part of account determination. These keys are used here to define the posting of the revenue generated to respective account heads& to subsequent assignment to GL accounts and payment to respective parties.
Please let me know if you need more information.
Assign points if useful.
Regards
Sridhar M

Account key and Accurals in Domestic Pricing Procedure

Dear all,
Can any one Guide me on Domestic Pricing Procedure.
Please suggest ur valuable inputs on This.
1)What is da use of account Key in Domestic Pricing Procedure ? which account keys need to be maintained for which are all condition types ?
2) When it is required to maintain account keys ( What is da Purpose )?
3)What is da use of accurals in Domestic Pricing Procedure ? which accurals keys need to be maintained for which are all condition types ?
4) When it is required to maintain accural keys ( What is da Purpose )?
Best Regards
Javeed ahamed

As Suggested by you similar to Frieght can we meet the Following below requirements
a) Does can we have an account key and accrual key for Discounts Which can be capture on MIRO? Does it add on material Cost ?
b) Does can we have an account key and accrual key for Packing and Farwarding which can be capture in MIRO ? Does it add on material Cost ?
c) Does can we have an account key and accrual key for Octroi ? Which can be capture on MIRO? Does it add on material Cost ?
Waiting for your Valuavle Suggestion.
Yes u can have the accounting key and accurak key for all those conditions in which u have marked the accurak key in condition ( M/06).
ALL the costs will be inventoried during whether u use accuarl and accounting or not. they are just use to flow the cost to different gls.
The acconting entries will be
during gr
Inventory account +ve 100 rs
GR/IR account          -ve    80 rs
purchase account   +ve    80 rs ( in obyc key EIN)
Frieght account       +ve    20 rs ( in gl defined in accounting key)
fright clearing account -ve 20 rs ( in gl defined in accural key)
Purchasing offset account -ve 100 rs( in obyc defined in purchaisng offset account).

ACCOUN KEYS AND ACCURALS CONFIGURATION

Hi Experts,
Regarding MM pricing procedure, Account key and accruals ,wher we will confispro setting and also G/L accounts maintaince.please explain
Regards
V.Ramakrishna

Hi,
Go to SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Conditions > Define Price Determination Process > Define Transaction/Event Keys.
Then assign these Transaction/Event Keys (Account Keys & Accrual) to the Condition Types in Calculation Schema in transaction M/08.
Then do Account Determination for the same in OBYC.

Maintain the acct key and acurals/provisions in calculation schema-MIRO

Hi,
In PO we have maintained different delivery condition.
When we are doing MIRO we are getting error "maintain the acct key and acurals/provisions in calculation schema" for condition type YLBB and YLBE.
However we have checked condition type and calulation schema and found that acct key and accurals maintained.
YLB9     BivacInspec.fee/Quan
YLBB     LPRC charges/Quant.
YLBC     Port charges/Quant.
YLBE     Clearing Charges/Qt.
Please suggest somesolution.
Thanks
Ashok

Hi Ashok,
In M/08 check whether   acct key and acurals/provisions in calculation schema" for condition type YLBB and YLBE are maintained or not.
Also if they are maintained there then check in M/06 for condition type YLBB and YLBE , whether accurals check box are checked or not...If not check and then try.
Cheers!!!
Utsav

Account key and Accrual key Urgent

Hi Friends
Where I can define account keys and accrual key for external service pricing procedure. Need your help ASAP.
Regards
Vivek

hi,
Account key:
1. spro --> sales and distribution --> basic functions --> account assignment and costing --> revenue account determination --> define and assign account keys.
2. In the pricing procedure , for that condition type, you will mention that ( if you want to post it into separate G/L account then) you will assign account key and accurals.
hope this may help you,
regards,
Srinivas

Search for [Remote Key] and [Remote System] in Data Manager

Hello all
I would like to be able to search on the remote key and the remote system in the MDM Data Manager is that not possible? I thought I remembered seeing that possibility under the Free-Form Search but now I can't find it.
I have, however, found this in the Data Manager reference guide:
REMOTE SYSTEM AND REMOTE KEY FIELDS
MDM uses the remote systems defined in the Remote Systems table
within the MDM Console to store and maintain key mapping information
for each record or text attribute. It does this using a virtual key
mapping field that you never see in the MDM Client.
This virtual key mapping field is very much like a qualified lookup field
into a virtual key mapping qualified lookup table.
Key Mapping information stored in virtual lookup field
The Remote System and Remote Key fields are normally not visible;
however, they do appear in several places in the MDM Client.
Specifically, both fields: (1) appear in the File > Export dialogs in Record
mode for exporting value pairs; (2) are recognized by the File > Import
dialog in Record mode for importing value pairs; and (3) appear in the
Edit Key Mappings dialogs in both Record mode and Taxonomy mode,
for viewing and editing value pairs.
Is there any way to search on the value in the remote key from the Data Manager?

Not sure search i think not possible.
But you can see keys as mentioned:
Enable Key mapping in Console.
MDM Client maens MDM Data Manager.
They do appear in several places in the MDM Client or Data Manager. Three different methods to see in DM are given already below:
Specifically, both fields: (1) appear in the File > Export dialogs in Record mode for exporting value pairs; (2) are recognized by the File > Import dialog in Record mode for importing value pairs; and (3) appear in the Edit Key Mappings dialogs in both Record mode and Taxonomy mode, for viewing and editing value pairs.
BR,
Alok

Diff b/w primary key and unique key?

what is the diff b/w primary key and unique key?

Hi,
With respect to functionality both are same.
But in ABAP we only have Primary key for the Database tables declared in the Data Dictionary.
Unique is generally is the term used with declaring key's for internal tables.
Both primary and Unique keys can identify one record of a table.
Regards,
Sesh

Access path difference between Primary Key and Unique Index

Hi All,
Is there any specific way the oracle optimizer treats Primary key and Unique index differently?
Oracle Version
SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
CORE    11.2.0.3.0      Production
TNS for IBM/AIX RISC System/6000: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
SQL> Sample test data for Normal Index
SQL> create table t_test_tab(col1 number, col2 number, col3 varchar2(12));
Table created.
SQL> create sequence seq_t_test_tab start with 1 increment by 1 ;
Sequence created.
SQL> insert into t_test_tab select seq_t_test_tab.nextval, round(dbms_random.value(1,999)) , 'B'||round(dbms_random.value(1,50))||'A' from dual connect by level < 100000;
99999 rows created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(USER_OWNER','T_TEST_TAB',cascade => true);
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> select col1 from t_test_tab;
99999 rows selected.
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 1565504962
| Id | Operation         | Name       | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |            | 99999 |   488K|    74   (3)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| T_TEST_TAB | 99999 |   488K|    74   (3)| 00:00:01 |
Statistics
          1 recursive calls
          0 db block gets
       6915 consistent gets
        259 physical reads
          0 redo size
    1829388 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
      73850 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
       6668 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
      99999 rows processed
SQL> create index idx_t_test_tab on t_test_tab(col1);
Index created.
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('USER_OWNER','T_TEST_TAB',cascade => true);
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> select col1 from t_test_tab;
99999 rows selected.
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 1565504962
| Id | Operation         | Name       | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |            | 99999 |   488K|    74   (3)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| T_TEST_TAB | 99999 |   488K|    74   (3)| 00:00:01 |
Statistics
          1 recursive calls
          0 db block gets
       6915 consistent gets
          0 physical reads
          0 redo size
    1829388 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
      73850 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
       6668 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
      99999 rows processed
SQL> Sample test data when using Primary Key
SQL> create table t_test_tab1(col1 number, col2 number, col3 varchar2(12));
Table created.
SQL> create sequence seq_t_test_tab1 start with 1 increment by 1 ;
Sequence created.
SQL> insert into t_test_tab1 select seq_t_test_tab1.nextval, round(dbms_random.value(1,999)) , 'B'||round(dbms_random.value(1,50))||'A' from dual connect by level < 100000;
99999 rows created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('USER_OWNER','T_TEST_TAB1',cascade => true);
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> select col1 from t_test_tab1;
99999 rows selected.
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 1727568366
| Id | Operation         | Name        | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |             | 99999 |   488K|    74   (3)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| T_TEST_TAB1 | 99999 |   488K|    74   (3)| 00:00:01 |
Statistics
          1 recursive calls
          0 db block gets
       6915 consistent gets
          0 physical reads
          0 redo size
    1829388 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
      73850 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
       6668 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
      99999 rows processed
SQL> alter table t_test_tab1 add constraint pk_t_test_tab1 primary key (col1);
Table altered.
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('USER_OWNER','T_TEST_TAB1',cascade => true);
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> select col1 from t_test_tab1;
99999 rows selected.
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 2995826579
| Id | Operation            | Name           | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT     |                | 99999 |   488K|    59   (2)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| PK_T_TEST_TAB1 | 99999 |   488K|    59   (2)| 00:00:01 |
Statistics
          1 recursive calls
          0 db block gets
       6867 consistent gets
          0 physical reads
          0 redo size
    1829388 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
      73850 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
       6668 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
      99999 rows processed
SQL> If you see here the even though statistics were gathered,
     * In the 1st table T_TEST_TAB, the table is still using FULL table access after creation of index.
     * And in the 2nd table T_TEST_TAB1, table is using PRIMARY KEY as expected.
Any comments ??
Regards,
BPat

Thanks.
Yes, ignored the NOT NULL part.Did a test and now it is working as expected
SQL> create table t_test_tab(col1 number not null, col2 number, col3 varchar2(12));
Table created.
SQL>
create sequence seq_t_test_tab start with 1 increment by 1 ;SQL>
Sequence created.
SQL> insert into t_test_tab select seq_t_test_tab.nextval, round(dbms_random.value(1,999)) , 'B'||round(dbms_random.value(1,50))||'A' from dual connect by level < 100000;
99999 rows created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('GREP_OWNER','T_TEST_TAB',cascade => true);
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> set autotrace traceonly
SQL> select col1 from t_test_tab;
99999 rows selected.
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 1565504962
| Id | Operation         | Name       | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |            | 99999 |   488K|    74   (3)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| T_TEST_TAB | 99999 |   488K|    74   (3)| 00:00:01 |
Statistics
          1 recursive calls
          0 db block gets
       6912 consistent gets
          0 physical reads
          0 redo size
    1829388 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
      73850 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
       6668 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
      99999 rows processed
SQL> create index idx_t_test_tab on t_test_tab(col1);
Index created.
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('GREP_OWNER','T_TEST_TAB',cascade => true);
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> select col1 from t_test_tab;
99999 rows selected.
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 4115006285
| Id | Operation            | Name           | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT     |                | 99999 |   488K|    63   (2)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| IDX_T_TEST_TAB | 99999 |   488K|    63   (2)| 00:00:01 |
Statistics
          1 recursive calls
          0 db block gets
       6881 consistent gets
          0 physical reads
          0 redo size
    1829388 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
      73850 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
       6668 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
      99999 rows processed
SQL>

Difference between Unique key and Unique index

Hi All,
I've got confused in the difference between unique index & unique key in a table.
While we create a unique index on a table, its created as a unique index.
On the other hand, if we create a unique key/constraint on the table, Oracle also creates an index entry for that. So I can find the same name object in all_constraints as well as in all_indexes.
My question here is that if during creation of unique key/constraint, an index is automatically created than why is the need to create unique key and then two objects , while we can create only one object i.e. unique index.
Thanks
Deepak

This is only my understanding and is not according to any documentation, that is as follows.
The unique key (constraint) needs an unique index for achieving constraint of itself.
Developers and users can make any constraint (unique-key, primary-key, foreign-key, not-null ...) to enable,disable and be deferable. Unique key is able to be enabled, disabled, deferable.
On the other hand, the index is used for performance-up originally, unique index itself doesn't have the concept like constraints. The index (including non-unique, unique) can be rebuilded,enabled,disabled etc. But I think that index cannot be set "deferable-builded" automatic.

Difference between primary key and primary index

Dear All,
Hi... .Could you pls tell me the difference between primary key and primary index.
Thanks...

Hi,
Primary Key : It is one which makes an entry of the field unique.No two distinct rows in a table can have the same value (or combination of values) in those columns.
Eg: first entry is 111, if you again enter value 111 , it doesnot allow 111 again. similarly for the strings or characters or numc etc. Remember that for char or numc or string 'NAME' is not equal to 'name'.
Primary Index: this is related to the performance .A database index is a data structure that improves the speed of operations in a table. Indices can be created using one or more columns, providing the basis for both rapid random lookups and efficient ordering of access to records. The disk space required to store the index is typically less than the storage of the table (since indices usually contain only the key-fields according to which the table is to be arranged, and excludes all the other details in the table), yielding the possibility to store indices into memory from tables that would not fit into it. In a relational database an index is a copy of part of a table. Some databases extend the power of indexing by allowing indices to be created on functions or expressions. For example, an index could be created on upper(last_name), which would only store the uppercase versions of the last_name field in the index.
In a database , we may have a large number of records. At the time of retrieving data from the database based on a condition , it is a burden to the db server. so whenever we create a primary key , a primary index is automatically created by the system.
If you want to maintain indices on other fields which are frequently used in where condition then you can create secondary indices.
Reward points if helpful.
Thanks,
Sirisha..

Is their a difference between primary key and unique key with not null valu

What is the difference in having a column as primary key and having unique key with not null for the column.
vinodh

SBH wrote:
For quick review, below is the link
http://www.dba-oracle.com/data_warehouse/clustered_index.htm
You appear to have stumbled on a site that is a mine of disinformation about Oracle.
>
It would be helpful, if you explain it too..thnx !!
The site is wrong and makes up its own terminology as it goes along.
If the value for clustering factor approaches the number of blocks in the base table, then the index is said to be clustered. http://www.oracle.com/pls/db112/search?remark=quick_search&word=clustered+index
There is no create clustered index in Oracle.
- Clustering factor affects the efficiency of an index.
- There can be clustered tables that you can create indexes on.
- An Index Organized table is a similar concept to the Microsoft SQL Server clustered index, but it isn't the same thing at all.

Difference between PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE KEY with NOT NULL

What is the difference between PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE KEY with NOT NULL constraint?
Message was edited by:
Nilesh Hole

Answer for the master!!!
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:8743855576462
Thanks,
Karthick

Easy Keys and Fn+F8 (WLAN on/off) don't work

Hello guys,
I have bought a new Toshiba Satellite A100-490 last week. I have tested all hot keys and function keys with the pre-installed Windows XP MCE. Everything worked.
But I needed a new customized installation of Windows XP Professional and Windows Server 2003 on the notebook. So I installed the XP Pro from a original CD-ROM and all Toshiba drivers, except of some special Managers (Assist, Config Free, SD Memory Format, Wireless LAN Client Manager, ...).
From the Easy Keys (Browser, Media Player, Play/Pause, Stop, Backward, Forward) only the Browser and Media Player Easy Key work. Which driver is responsible for the other Easy Keys (Play/Pause, Stop, Backward, Forward)?
The next problem is, that the Fn+F8 (WLAN switch) hot key doesn't work. But when I disable the WLAN over the hardware switch, there comes a MessageBox that I have to enable the WLAN over the hardware switch first. Normally there has to come a On-Screen-Display. What is wrong?
Please help me. Thanks!
Kaan

Hello Silas,
I have all the drivers you mentioned already installed, but nothing changed.
So I am going to install all the software and drivers again.
Please tell me, which drivers are at least required, so that every hot and easy key works.
I've put a "x" before all utilities and drivers which I have installed the last time. Did I forget to install something?
o Microsoft Updates
o Sun Java Runtime Environment
x Chipset Driver
x Display Driver
x Flash Media Driver
x Touch pad Driver
x Sound Driver
x Modem Driver
x Network Driver
x Wireless Network Driver
o Intel Client Utility
o Atheros Client Utility
o Bluetooth Stack
o Bluetooth Monitor
x Common Modules
x Hotkey Utility
x cPad/Touch pad On-Off Utility
x Utilities
x Power Management
o SD Memory Card Format
x SD Secure Module
o Assist
o ConfigFree
x Virtual Sound
o Zooming Utility
x Button Controls
o PC Diagnostic Tool
x CD/DVD Drive Acoustic Silencer
o DVD-RAM Driver Software
x WinDVD Creator
o RecordNow
o DLA
x DVD Player
o User`s Manual
Thank you for your help.
Kaan

Private key and digital certificate

I have a keystore . in ordeer to know what it contains ,i opened this keystore with this command ...keytool -list -keystore DemoIdentity.jks
and i got,
Keystore type: jks
Keystore provider: SUN
Your keystore contains 1 entry
demoidentity, Jan 4, 2007, keyEntry, // is it called private key ?
Certificate fingerprint (MD5): 60:42:75:33:31:AA:9A:C6:9D:1A:CD:9F:22:8D:4A:6A // is it called certificate ?
Question :
I still dont understand what a keystore contains. does it contains "private key" + "digital certificate" ?
If so , what are private keys and digital certificate in the above contents ?
Message was edited by:
Unknown_Citizen
Message was edited by:
Unknown_Citizen

The content of a 'keystore' is what you, or the person who provided it, put in it. In this case it looks like all it contains it a public key certificate with an alias of 'demoidentity' .

Accouting Key and Accurals

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for