Add Image Sequence default frame rate

Compresssor 3.5 appears to default to 24 fps when adding image sequences to the batch.
Is it possible to change this default to 23.98 fps in a plist somewhere? I deal almost exclusively in 23.98 material so having to change this for EVERY image sequence I process is a pain.
-Matt

I'll try to re-formulate (I'm sorry, english is not my native language).
What I do in Compressor:
1) I import my image sequence
2) set it at 25fps in the image sequence settings
3) choose prores 25fps export (I created a prores preset at 25fps, as you suggested)
And the resulting clip is okay.
BUT
I have many image sequences and it's too slow to manually interpret every one of them at 25fps. The problem is in point 2). Because there's no way to interpret all the image sequences at 25fps with just one click for all.
I think it's the same with quicktime: you have to import every single image sequence, select the frame rate, export... one at a time.
I will have a look at mpeg streamclip.
thanks for answers

Similar Messages

  • After Effects CC import "Sequence Footage" frame rate settings in "Import" preferences

    Just started using the new AE CC (v12 as Adobe will not refer to it as) I noticed one thing that seems to work differently from CS6 and that is in the preferences for import Sequence footage settings.  It doesn't seem to work normally, at least for me.  I don't know if this is an issue related to how AE CC works with the cloud but the dfault frame rate for sequence footage importing is 30fps.  I am trying to import footage that is natively 23.97 at 24 fps.  So like in CS6 I go to Preferences - Import - Sequence Footage - frame per second and change it from 30 to 24 frames per second.  Closed the software, opened it back up, checked the settings and saw that they took, it still says 24 frames per second like I told it.  But when I import a piece of 23.976 footage, it comes in at 23.976 as opposed to the 24 fps I set it as.  Same goes for 30 fps footage, it comes in at 30 fps and not 24.  User error is always my first assumption, I'm not proud i just want it to work, am I doing something wrong or just confused?  Thanks for any help.  p.s.  help is not someone responding with, "I don't know" or "I don't have AECC yet".  I know somebody is going to!

    Hi Tim,
    WOW!  Thanks for the super-fast reply!  As soon as I posted this I realised I should have mentioned that I am importing DPX files.  I do import quicktimes as well but know that the footage import does not apply to a single file, only a sequence of files.  But I still wonder if I may be either doing something wrong or am just a little confused.  I have been using After Effects since CS3 doing compositing for film and I always use DPX sequences.  I did a bunch of comparing and back and forth with AE CS6 and AECC while trying to figure this out.  I always set my preferences up when I upgrade before I start working and I always set them up the same.  I have been using CS6 since last July and it still works the same.  What I did is imported five or six different DPX sequences, some were rendered out as 24 fps, some at 30 and some at 23.976.  Assuming AE looks at the metadata to decide how to auto interpret, AE CC opened them all at their native frame rates of the just mentioned 24, 30 and 23.976 respectively, even though I told it to import at 24fps in the preferences.  I also imported the same files in AE CS6 and they all opened at 24 fps like always.  I know I can change the frame rate in the "Interpret footage" option, that is what I have been doing today so that I can work with footage in 24fps but since I have it set in the preferences to import image sequences at 24fps, I am perplexed as to why it does not do so, so I do not have to interpret the footage to my preferred frame rate, as is the case in AE CS6 as well as it was in CS 5.5 and CS 3.  Since I was lucky enough to have an Adobe employee chime in Tim, I would be curious to see what you may find if you recreated this scenario.  Would it be possible for you or someone at Adobe to set the sequence footage import frame rate to 24 fps in the preferences then try to open a piece of footage that is natively 23.976 fps in both AE CS6 and AE CC?  Like I said, I certainly beleive I may be doing something wrong but I would be very curious to see what you find on your side.  I would not be suprised if it imported at 24 fps in AE CS6 and 23.976 fps in AE CC.

  • Add image sequence in Compressor 3.0.5?

    I am trying to import still images and convert to a quicktime file to process my time-lapse photography. Can compressor 3.0.5 do this function?

    Nick is right. QT7 is a better choice.
    Make sure your images are numbered sequentially.
    Open up QT7.
    Select: File>Open Image Sequence
    Import the files,
    Select the Frame Rate
    Select Export
    Select Quicktime Movie then Options
    Set the video codec and audio settings, etc.
    Export.
    Be happy.
    x

  • Acquire and save images at high frame rates

    I am attempting to acquire and save images at a rate of 3000 fps for approximately 100 ms using a JAI 6740GE GigE camera, LabView 2011, and IMAQdx.  I can acquire the images at the necessary rates, but am dropping images when I try to save them.  The current test program I am working with contains a producer loop for acquiring the images, converting them into an array, and putting them into a queue, and a consumer loop to write the arrays to a TDMS file.  Currently I can acquire and save the images at a rate of approximately 1200 fps before I begin losing a few frames.  The code is attached below.  I would appreciate any ideas to be able to save the images without dropping frames.
    Attachments:
    Trigger Image to AVI faster.vi ‏38 KB

    Hi Rox,
    How are you verifying that you are loosing the frames during the saving and not during the acquisition? Are you able to determine where you are dropping frames? Is it at the beginning, the end or randomly? Thank you!
    Regards,
    Kira T

  • Size of Add Image Sequence in Compressor is too small?

    Hello all,
    i tried to import an image sequence into Compressor (20 Tiff files sequentially numbered with 1920x1080 aspect ratio) so i can export it to Apple ProRes. I want to do this through compressor so as to be able to use the batch option in the future...
    Problem is, after i import the image sequence, in the inspector window under the A/V attributes tab i see encoded bounds: 68x40 and display bounds: 68x40 and the image appears to be 68x40 in pixel size. I tried to export the sequence to Apple Pro Res 1920x1080 to see if it was just the compressor preview that looked bad. Now i have an ugly 1920x1080 image that originates from a 68x40 image, You can imagine the pixel size!!!!!!
    Am i doing something wrong here? Is there a limit to what size of images can compressor handle?
    Thanks
    Tolis

    Well, i am replying to myself...
    my original tiff files were slightly longer than 1080 pixels wide (1128 pixels) and that is why Compressor could not work with them!!!!! Once i used a tiff file that was 1920x1080 all worked fine...
    Thread solved....
    T

  • Resize and display large images at high frame rate.

    Hi,
    I am looking for some suggestions on how to implement fast image display.
    I have a device which creates 3000x3000 data arrays which I then convert into images. The device can output this data at anywhere from 5-50fps.
    For display these are then resized to about 500x500 pixels.
    The problem I have is that the resizing part of the process is quite slow and takes around 3/4 second .
    So does anyone have an suggestions on I can get the images to the screen at a reasonably quick rate ?
    I guess I need some sort of queue but has someone an example of how to do this ?
    Thanks,
    Paul

    Hi Rox,
    How are you verifying that you are loosing the frames during the saving and not during the acquisition? Are you able to determine where you are dropping frames? Is it at the beginning, the end or randomly? Thank you!
    Regards,
    Kira T

  • How to improve Ni-IMAQ LVDS Sequence Capture Frame Rate?

    Im trying to collect 300 consecutive  frames off a 60hz, 320x240 16 bit camera on Win2000 (1.5Ghz, 512MB).
    Using the HLSequence vc++ sample project as the baseline, Im just
    changing  the NUM_SEQUENCE_BUFFERS to 300, and use GetTickCount
    (10ms granularity) to time it:
    unsigned long   skippedBuffers[NUM_SEQUENCE_BUFFERS] = {0};
    errChk(imgSequenceSetup (Sid, NUM_SEQUENCE_BUFFERS, (void
    **)ImaqBuffers, skippedBuffers, TRUE, TRUE));
    before  = GetTickCount();
    while ( status )
            errChk(imgSessionStatus (Sid, &status, &currBufNum));
    after = GetTickCount();
    After several iterations, it seems the difference in ticks between
    the  before and after is around 1372... which at 10ms between each
    tick,  indicates over 13 seconds to complete!  At 60hz, Im
    thinking 300 frames  SHOULD be about 5 seconds.
    Are the buffers that IMAQ "Sequence" uses for the capture,
    internally  dma'd to the *PC's RAM* memory or is it actually using
    the *disk* to  store it?
    What can I do to get it near 60 frames a second?
    Also, I dont know of any way to timestamp each frame, but is there any
    way to see how contiguous the frames are that are captured?

    Hello snoop911,
    I posted an answer to a very similar post yesterday.  See Here.
    Please let me know if you have any other questions about this issue that I can help with.
    Regards,
    Angela
    Applications Engineer

  • Help with TIFF image sequence frame rate?

    I'm working on an animation sequence, its a 24p project.  Whenever I import an image sequence, Premiere automatically interprets this at 29.97 (though, per the help files, it should automatically interpret at the project frame rate, but it's not).  In the project panel, I use interpret footage so that it interprets at 24p.  However, when I bring this image sequence into the timeline it shows at the right duration, but the end of the sequence is cut off (essentially, premiere is still reading in at 30p, but gives it the duration of 24p).
    CS4 is the first version I've had this problem with.. usually, I just bring in the image sequence and it's fine.
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks.

    Hi, I have the same problem as my workflow is to import R3D into AE CC and render it into Tiff sequence. At first I had changed every setting to 24, and it rendered out choppy and clipped off a few frames in the end.
    Now I have tried this
    Once you import Tiff, right click> Interpret Footage > Main
    Then you will see black box. In this column box, there is Frame Rate column, then tick Assume this frame rate: 24 frames per second.
    You have to type in 24 yourself, then it works out fine.
    My guess is that Tiff is sequence image, and it DOES NOT have frame rate. So you have to tell AE to assume the imported image sequence's frame rate. Otherwise it always assumes 30 by default.
    Hope it works.
    DDH111

  • QT Pro batch import of image sequences aand export of MOVs

    I have multiple folders with sequentially numbered jpegs and I am trying to find some way to batch process (with QT Pro or Automator or some combination of any program, without paying a fortune) each folder to a MOV. For example, parent folder with 3 subfolders - is there a way to point QT Pro at the parent folder and have it create MOVs with specific export settings for each respective folder? I do know how to Open Image Sequence, choose frame rate, choose settings, export to MOV but I'd like to find a way to do it without having to choose the first image of each folder. Any ideas?
    Thanks.

    Check the frame rate in the Interpret Footage dialog box.

  • Most efficient way of changing still image frame rates?

    I'm using Premiere CS5.5 and have been having issues with the audio/video going out of sync when I upload my video to Vimeo (it's not out of sync prior to uploading it...it only happens after they transcode it). The Vimeo support staff says the problem is that I'm using a variable frame rate, but since there isn't any option (to my knowledge) to choose a constant or variable framerate in Premiere/Adobe Media Encoder, I think I have identified the problem. The primary footage that I shot with is 23.976 fps and that is what my sequence settings and output settings have been, but I also have a lot of still images that I'm using for b-roll, which I finally noticed are 29.97 fps. I changed the Intermediate Media Timebase setting to 23.976 fps in the preferences, but my question now is if there is an efficient way to change the frame rate of all those still images without having to re-import them and re-apply all the various motion effects/key framing that I've already spent a lot of time on?
    Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks.

    Yeah, I downloaded MediaInfo to explore some of the various versions that I've rendered in my effort to get something that works correctly on Vimeo, and depending on the encoder I saw some of what Ann posted, but I also looked at one on MediaInfo that I had rendered through Adobe Media Encoder and it had a Constant frame rate mode of 23.976, yet I remember watching that one on Vimeo at the time and it was still out of sync--Mediainfo says that version has a variable audio bit rate though, but to my knowledge there isn't an option in AME to choose a constant audio bit rate.
    I agree that it's an issue on Vimeo's side, but the chances of them getting their **** together in a timely fashion seem low. The frustrating thing is that I can watch documentary style videos on Vimeo that I know were edited and compressed through Premiere/AME, yet they don't have any audio sync issues. The difference that I noticed between one of those videos and mine is the use of still images in my video. As you can see from an image I uploaded earlier, the default frame rate for still images when I imported them was 29.97 until I changed it yesterday, but it didn't update the images I had already imported. So I'm wondering if there is a way to change the frame rate of those still images without having to re-import the images and make all my edits/key framing all over again.

  • CS4; detecting correct FPS when importing an image sequence

    Here's the problem: I'm rendering a sequence in a serie of targa images at 24 fps in 3dsmax. When importing into premiere pro it always sets it to 29.97 fps. I can use the interpret footage to change it back to 24 fps, but when you have multiple videos everyday it quickly becomes a time waster.
    Is there a way to do it automatically?
    Thanks,

    Because Premiere changed from having Project Settings in CS3 to Sequence Settings in CS4 and because there is no setting to set the default frame rate for image sequences, there is simply no way to do what you want.
    Project Settings used to govern the default frame rate for Sequences and for image sequences.   In CS4, that's not the case.
    It seems Adobe forgot about users who use image sequences on a regular basis.

  • How do I output the smoothest video when changing or mixing frame rates from the original footage?

    I have been experimenting with various Media Encoder settings, and wondered if there was anything else I can try to get the smoothest video output possible, especially when changing frame rate and possibly resolution.  For clarification, let me start from the beginning and explain what I'm doing and what I've tried so far.  I'll try to be as brief as possible, but if I do go into too much detail, I apologize. 
    My original footage is AVCHD 1080p - 60fps.  (my camera only does 60fps...specifically 59.94fps)  We're not talking interlaced video here, I'm staying away from that.  This is definitely full frame, progressive video at 60 frames (not fields) per second.  My output will ultimately be for the web.  I have been keeping my output codec (H.264) and bit-rate (VBR 2-pass, relatively high-bitrate) consistent, and have been trying numerous output options and even sequence settings to see what would yield the best results.  I am using Premiere Pro CS5.5 along with Media Encoder.  Here's what I've done and the results I've observed:
    1.  I created a sequence with 1080p - 59.94fps settings to match my original footage.  I then output both 1080p and 720p versions at 59.94fps, and at 29.97fps.  The 59.94fps output files looked absolutely great, as would be expected.  Extremely smooth.  The 29.97fps output files were generally smooth, but not near as smooth as the 59.94fps.  This is expected since it's half the frame rate as my original footage.  However, my question is this:  What exactly is Media Encoder doing when "down converting" from 60p to 30p?  From a technical stand point, is it dropping every other frame?  I'm just curious to understand exactly what it does.  I tried the Frame Blending option as well, and that only yielded a bit more blur to the images which wasn't desirable for any of the output files. 
    2.  Just to see what would happen, I created a sequence with 1080p - 29.97 settings.  I then output both 1080p and 720p versions at 29.97fps.  The video was much more choppy in these cases, even with Frame Blending on.  Now, I know not matching my sequence settings with my original media isn't ideal, but I again just want to understand why this yields less smooth video than the 29.97fps options above.  Why does cutting the sequence settings frame rate in half from the original, then outputting the same frame rate as the sequence yield video that is not as smooth?
    3.  Next, I wanted to try mixing frame rates to see how Premiere and Media Encoder handled the footage and output files.  Premiere handled it great, no issues there.  However, I had some interesting things happen when I output the files.  Here's what I did:  I created a sequence with 1080p - 59.94fps to match my original footage.  Then I took the same exact footage that was in my sequence, copied it in my project panel and interpreted it at both 23.976 and 29.97 fps, yielding slow motion video.  The slow motion video looked great in Premiere, so I went ahead and just added it to my sequences, along with the original 59.94 footage.  I also created separate sequences for the 29.97 and 23.976 footage respectively, each with matching sequence settings, then added a nested sequence to another original footage sequence (with 59.94fps sequence settings) to see which yielded the best results.  Basically, I'm trying to output 59.94fps that match my original footage, but also throw in some slow motion footage at different framerates.  I'll explain my results in a moment as they are a bit convoluted, however, here is my question:  When mixing frame rates and trying to output the smoothest video, am I going about this the right way?  I would assume you would use your sequence settings that match the original footage (which is what the majority of the footage will be), then bring in a nested sequence for the slow motion (as oppose to just dropping the slow motion video directly into my main sequence), and then output to the same frame rate of the majority of the footage, in this case 59.94fps. Is there a better workflow for this?
    The results to #3 above were as follows.  Initially, it looked like it didn't matter if I nested the slow motion sequence into my main sequence, or simply dropped the actual slow motion video into my original 59.94fps sequence.  It seemed to produce smooth results either way.  Frame Blending blurred the video a bit, but didn't seem to make much difference, and quite honestly I like the footage without Frame Blending in general.  However, when I closed down Premiere, and opened the output files later (opening in Quicktime), the footage looked choppy.  In fact, it would go from choppy to smooth and back, almost like it had an irregular cadence (don't know if I'm using "cadence" in the right context here).  I would then open up Premiere again, import the output footage into my project panel, and play the footage in Premiere, and it would play back smooth again. Is this a Quicktime issue?  I was playing 1080p 59.94fps files when this happened, so maybe it's just because it's a large file.  Doesn't seem to have issues with the 720p files I created.  But it sure threw me off with my testing because I then started second guessing the settings I was using.  My iMac is the latest 2011 model with plenty of RAM, so I wouldn't think it's the computer.  Thoughts?
    4.  Next, I noticed on ALL my output files (again, using the H.264 codec from Media Encoder) that the color of my video seemed to flatten quite a bit.  It seems that the original footage has more contrast and saturation than the output files.  I figured maybe this was just how it was, but when I re-imported the output files back into Premiere, they looked IDENTICAL to the original footage.  And in Media Encoder's Source/Output windows, I don't see any difference there either. Is Quicktime again the culprit here, doing some odd things to the color of my videos?
    5.  Regarding Frame Blending, when is the best situation to enable this option in Media Encoder?  I've read it is when mixing frame rates, but I honestly didn't see too much of a change except for a bit more blur, which I didn't care for.
    6.  Lastly, my conclusion is that 60fps yields the smoothest video, which is an obvious conclusion.  However, I know that 60fps isn't the best or easiet frame rate for web delivery.  It seems 30p is more the standard.  Are there any integrated web players that would play 60fps?  Can you get 60fps video on YouTube/Vimeo?  If yes to any of these questions, can they do 720p and 1080p at 60fps? 
    Those are all my questions.  I hope I am clear enough without being overly wordy and hopefully I didn't put too many questions into one post.  Thanks in advance for any insight, I really appreciate it.

    Did you ever figure out which output worked the best? I have the same original footage; trying to determine the best output settings to make a dvd for tv.
    thanks!

  • Import of "image sequence" grays out when you select multiple jpg in Premier CC

    It worked jus fine untill a few days ago after the CC update. I even reset the number sequencing on my camera to try a test set of picture.  no matter what I do the "image sequence" check box grays out as soon as i click on multiple jpgs.
    any one ever have this occur?

    As joe bloe says, select only a single image file to enable the Image Sequence checkbox. Once you select multiple files, then the importer is set to import as multiple single still images. FYI, you can also select any file (other than the frst), if you wish to import a shorter range of files (eg: select 0040 to import an image sequence of frame 40 and on)

  • Exporting Large videos as image sequences using Quick Time Convert

    I am trying to export some fairly long videos as image sequences >10000 frames with Final Cut Pro using the quick time conversion tool.
    I am working with SD and HD videos.
    While some sequences export without error (both SD & HD) occasionally an "error" occurs which results in the 10000th frame (and in one case the 1000th frame) not being written. The File is opened as "MyVideoName#FFFFFFF.png" but no data is written to it. (Obviously it should be MyVideoName10000.png)
    There is 500Gb of free space on the disk I am writing to.
    At the moment I can't even work out why it fails in some instances - apart from the fact it seems to be related to the file name.
    I would appreciate any help any one can offer!
    Thanks,
    John
    G5   Mac OS X (10.3.8)   FCP HD 4.5; QT 6.5

    Thanks for your reply!
    So far I've not managed to come up with a workable solution.
    Exporting as an image sequence is infact a work around... I originally was planning to export the videos as uncompressed .avi files but (as documented elsewhere) this does not work for videos >10Gb.
    Some videos have exported fine both those longer and shorter than 10000 frames. However, for some videos only the first 9999 frames are exported. As a workaround I was planning to export the remainder of the videos seperately (as a subclip) but this only managed to export the first 999 frames (the 1000th file opened is called MyVideoName#FFFFFFFF, but no data is written to it).
    At the moment I can't find any explanation for the cause of this problem. Are there any logs or any way to get more detailed error information?
    Thanks again for your help,
    John

  • Adjust Frame Rate

    iMovie default frame rates are 25fps for Pal or 29.97 for NTSC.
    With iMovie 09 there are a few software workarounds to get iMovie to maintain the frame rate as your original or to render an AIC file at full 50/60fps.
    I want to maintain the 50 fps as my original HD footage, but with iMovie 06 (my favoured editing package) - Can this be done ??

    Many thanks - A straight forward answer. Still wish Apple would release iMovie 6 for developers to run with and make a few tweaks as I still love it as a program over and above other editors for simple throwing together of clips!!

Maybe you are looking for

  • How Can I do that the leds of my UIR is blinkin all the time

    Hello I have  a question of CVI, I am modify a UIR and I am add a LEDs in my UIR, I nedded do that these Leds is blinking all the time, but I am having problem for do this. I know that exist 2 functions in CVI SetCtrlVal and GetCtrlVal for Set and Ge

  • How do I re-install CS4 on my computer ?

    I have a Mac. I want to delete everything, and perform a 'clean install' of Lion. So my copy of CS4 will have been deleted. I think it was bought as an upgrade to CS3 or equivalent. I have the CS4 disks - but I worry that they won't work if I don't h

  • Bridge CS6 WIll Not Open

    HI, Windows 7 Home Premium 32bit 4 GByte memory. Downloaded and installes CS6 trial and Bridge will not open; there is hard disk activity at the beginning and then nothing. Any thoughts, thanks? Pete

  • Songs changing of gender after play

    Since itunes 11 some of my songs get their gender changed after playing and I have to correct them constantly. Can somebody help me understand what is going on an how can I solve it?

  • UDF mapping to split string

    Hi, I'm starting with UDF functions. How can i split source string at '-' and take first part into target. ex : 123-456 -> 123 Easy points for those who know... Thanks in advance, Laurent.