[ADF BC | ADF Faces] Updating a table with values updated in transaction

Summary: A table is based on a view with a bind variable. Based on some action, I update rows in the view so that they no longer satisfy the query. How do I update the table to reflect this?
I have an ADF Faces page with a multi-select table component on it, mapped to an ADF Business Components view object. The view object has a bind variable (:Status), which is used in the query to only retrieve rows with a specific status.
The user selects rows in the table that should have their status changed, and then hits a button to perform the action. In the backing bean for the page, the button click is processed and the selected rows are updated to a different status. At this point the transaction is not committed.
Changing the status of these rows now means that they no longer match the where clause of the view object, yet they still appear in the table.
My question is, how can I update the table so that rows which don't match the where clause are removed?
This is a simplified version of the problem I am working on - this needs to work when rows that aren't in the table are being updated so that they now MATCH the where clause and rows may also be added or completely removed.

Quite an interesting little problem....
I have created a simple test case to illustrate your scenario - perhaps Steve M could comment...
My scenario:
1). create an EO based on the HR.EMPLOYEES table
2). create an updatable VO based upon the aforementioned EO. Add "COMMISSION_PCT IS NULL" to the where clause.
3). Add the VO to an app module as usual.
4). Create an ADF Faces page by dropping the VO from the data control as an ADF table. Show only first name, last name, and commission pct.
5). Add a command button to the page so I can call various code from the backing bean.
Now, when I update the commision for the first record to ".1" and press the submit button (the one in the table actions facet), the update "takes" - I assume that it's just in the EO cache at this point. The record still shows on the screen, even though it no longer meets the where clause criteria.
When I add some code to the command button (#5) to perform a commit - the record STILL shows on the screen after committing to the DB. I can make the record disappear by either (in the same backing-bean method that does the commit)
a). Re-execute the iterator after the commit
b). Call "clearVOCaches" on the application module (forces the iterator to re-execute)
I even tried programmatically adding the where clause back in (via addWhereClause) and re-executing the iterator - no go. I suspect that the only way to do this would be to post the changes to the DB (without committing them) and then re-execute the query. This, however, would be a killer from a scalability perspective.
John

Similar Messages

How to update this table with values from another table ?

Hi
I have a table "regies". I want to replace the values of the column "regies.agent" by the value of the column "regies_personnes.id"
As you see the tables have a common values column. ie regies.agent = regies_personnes.nom
Table "regies" :
Insert into "regies" (AGENT) values ('Humberdot Alain');
Insert into "regies" (AGENT) values ('Danard Patrick');
Table "regies_personnes" :
Insert into REGIES_PERSONNES (NOM,ID) values ('Humberdot Alain',1);
Insert into REGIES_PERSONNES (NOM,ID) values ('Danard Patrick',2);
Before we have this
sql>select agent from regies ;
Humberdot Alain
Danard Patrick
After the update, the result should be
sql>select agent from regies ;
1
2
Thank you for your kind answer.

You will face error if you have duplicates
ORA-01427 Single row subquery returns Multiple rows.Try this way
create table regies(agent varchar2(30));
create table regies_personnes( nom varchar2(30),id number);
Insert into regies (AGENT) values ('Humberdot Alain');
Insert into regies (AGENT) values ('Danard Patrick');
Insert into REGIES_PERSONNES (NOM,ID) values ('Humberdot Alain',1);
Insert into REGIES_PERSONNES (NOM,ID) values ('Danard Patrick',2);
Insert into regies (AGENT) values ('Humberdot Alain');
Insert into regies (AGENT) values ('Danard Patrick');
Insert into REGIES_PERSONNES (NOM,ID) values ('Humberdot Alain',1);
Insert into REGIES_PERSONNES (NOM,ID) values ('Danard Patrick',2);
commit;
update regies r set agent = (select id from regies_personnes p where r.agent = p.nom
and rownum=1)
where exists (select id from regies_personnes p where r.agent = p.nom
commit

URGENT update a table with a text that has a single quote in it

Hello, I am trying to update a table with a text that has a single quote in it. I believe I need to use two singles quotes but I am not sure how.
For example:
UPDATE TEST
SET DESCRLONG='Aux fins d'exportations'
WHERE etc...
Should I put 2 singles quotes before the quote in the text?
UPDATE TEST
SET DESCRLONG='Aux fins d'''exportations'
WHERE etc...
Thank you very much :)

The best way depends on the version of Oracle.
But, the quick and universal answer is to use two single quotes
SQL> connect test/test
Connected.
SQL> create table test (descrlong varchar2(128));
Table created.
SQL> insert into test values ('This is a string with a '' single quote');
1 row created.
SQL> select * from test;
DESCRLONG
This is a string with a ' single quote
SQL> update test set descrlong='Aux fins d''exportations'
2 where descrlong like 'T%';
1 row updated.
SQL> select * from test;
DESCRLONG
Aux fins d'exportations
SQL>

Is it possible to update multiple tables with a dynamic form?

I have columns from two tables populating a dynamic form. I am trying to have the form update both tables on submit. I have tried both a linked transaction and a custom transaction but I am not making progress. Only the master table is being updated. Is it possible with ADDT to update two tables with a dynamic form?

I meant
SXMSMSTAT
SXMSSYERR
Thanks.

How can I update the table with a single query for...

I have a table with columns C1 and C2.
C1 C2
A1 null
A1 null
A1 null
A1 null
A2 null
A2 null
A2 null
A3 null
A4 null
A4 null
I want to update my table with a single query so that I would have data like
C1 C2
A1 1
A1 2
A1 3
A1 4
A2 1
A2 2
A2 3
A3 1
A4 1
A4 2
The updated column C2 has the values like serial no grouped on the column C1.

SQL> create table mytable
2 ( c1 varchar2(2)
3 , c2 number(2)
4 )
5 /
Tabel is aangemaakt.
SQL> insert into mytable (c1)
2 select 'A1' from dual union all
3 select 'A1' from dual union all
4 select 'A1' from dual union all
5 select 'A1' from dual union all
6 select 'A2' from dual union all
7 select 'A2' from dual union all
8 select 'A2' from dual union all
9 select 'A3' from dual union all
10 select 'A4' from dual union all
11 select 'A4' from dual
12 /
10 rijen zijn aangemaakt.
SQL> select * from mytable
2 /
C1                                     C2
A1
A1
A1
A1
A2
A2
A2
A3
A4
A4
10 rijen zijn geselecteerd.
SQL> merge into mytable t1
2 using (select c1
3              , row_number() over (partition by c1 order by null) rn
4              , rowid rid
5           from mytable
6        ) t2
7     on (t1.rowid = t2.rid)
8   when matched then
9        update set c2 = rn
10   when not matched then
11        insert values (null,null)
12 /
10 rijen zijn samengevoegd.
SQL> select * from mytable
2 /
C1                                     C2
A1                                      1
A1                                      2
A1                                      3
A1                                      4
A2                                      1
A2                                      2
A2                                      3
A3                                      1
A4                                      1
A4                                      2
10 rijen zijn geselecteerd.Regards,
Rob.

Updating base table with Materialized View's data

Hi,
In order to update base table with MVs data, I am trying real time data transfer between two databases. One is Oracle 8i and other is Oracle 9i. I have created an updatable MV in 9i on a base table using database link. The base table is in 8i. Materialized View log is created in 8i on base table. MV has to be associated to some replication group, but I am not able to create replication group in 9i to which MV has to be associated. The required packages are not installed.
Replication packages are to be used to create replication group are :
/*Create Materialized View replication group*/
BEGIN
DBMS_REPCAT.CREATE_MVIEW_REPGROUP (
gname => 'TEST_MV_GRP',
master => 'TEST_DATA_LINK',
propagation_mode => 'ASYNCHRONOUS');
END;
But above block is giving error.
Can anyone suggest how to resolve this, or are there any other approaches (by not using replication packages) to update base table with MVs data ?
Thanks,
Shailesh

Yes, I created link between two databases and was able to update tables on 8i from 9i database using that link.
The error I am getting while creating replication group is :
ORA-06550
PLS-00201 : identifier 'SYS.DBMS_REPCAT_UTL2@'TEST_DATA_LINK' must be declared
ORA-06550
PLS-00201 : identifier 'SYS.DBMS_REPCAT_UNTRUSTED@'TEST_DATA_LINK' must be declared
ORA-06512 : at "SYS.DBMS_REPCAT_UTL", line 2394
ORA-06512 : at "SYS.DBMS_REPCAT_SNA_UTL", line 1699
ORA-06512 : at "SYS.DBMS_REPCAT_SNA", line 64
ORA-06512 : at "SYS.DBMS_REPCAT", line 1262
Is there any other approach which can be used to update base table with MVs data instead of using replication packages ?
Thanks,
Shailesh

Best way to update a table with disinct values

Hi, i would really appreciate some advise:
I need to reguarly perform a task where i update 1 table with all the new data that has been entered from another table. I cant perform a complete insert as this will create duplicate data every time it runs so the only way i can think of is using cursors as per the script below:
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE update_new_mem IS
tmpVar NUMBER;
CURSOR c_mem IS
SELECT member_name,member_id
FROM gym.members;
crec c_mem%ROWTYPE;
BEGIN
OPEN c_mem;
LOOP
FETCH c_mem INTO crec;
EXIT WHEN c_mem%NOTFOUND;
BEGIN
UPDATE gym.lifts
SET name = crec.member_name
WHERE member_id = crec.member_id;
EXCEPTION
WHEN NO_DATA_FOUND THEN NULL;
END;
IF SQL%NOTFOUND THEN
BEGIN
INSERT INTO gym.lifts
(name,member_id)
VALUES (crec.member_name,crec.member_id);
END;
END IF;
END LOOP;
CLOSE c_mem;
END update_new_mem;
This method works but is there an easier (faster) way to update another table with new data only?
Many thanks

>
This method works but is there an easier (faster) way to update another table with new data only?
>
Almost anything would be better than that slow-by-slow loop processing.
You don't need a procedure you should just use MERGE for that. See the examples in the MERGE section of the SQL Language doc
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28286/statements_9016.htm
MERGE INTO bonuses D
   USING (SELECT employee_id, salary, department_id FROM employees
   WHERE department_id = 80) S
   ON (D.employee_id = S.employee_id)
   WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE SET D.bonus = D.bonus + S.salary*.01
     DELETE WHERE (S.salary > 8000)
   WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN INSERT (D.employee_id, D.bonus)
     VALUES (S.employee_id, S.salary*.01)
     WHERE (S.salary <= 8000);

Updating a table with billion rows

It was an interview question, what's the best way to update a table with 10 billion rows. Give me your suggestions. Thanks in advance.
svk

The best way to answer questions such as this is NOT with a absolute and specific answer. Instead, discuss your strategy for approaching the problem. The first step is to understand your exact requirement. It is surprising how often people
write update statements with an under-qualified where clause. NEVER update a row that does not need to be updated. For example, a statement like:
update mytable set cola = 'ABC' where id in (1, 45, 212);
Assuming id is unique for the table and the specified values exist in the table, we know 3 rows will be updated. Do all of those rows need to be updated? Think about it. If cola is already set to 'ABC' for any of those rows, we could ignore
those rows and make the update more efficient. To do that, you need to add "and cola <> 'ABC' " to the where clause. That is just one example of understanding exactly what you need to do - and doing only that which needs to be done.
Once you understand exactly what you need to do, you need to analyze the impact of the update and identify any potential issues. Updating a lot of rows can take a lot of time and consume large amounts of log and disk space. What else is using
the table? Can you afford to lock the table for the duration of the update? Are there concurrency issues, regardless of whether you update in batches or in one single statement? When using a batch approach, is there an issue if someone runs
a query against the table (i.e., the result is different from that of the same query run after all updates have been completed)? Are you changing something which is included in an index? Are you changing part of the clustered index?
Ultimately, every question you are asked is (or should be) designed to test your problem-solving skills and your skillset. IMO, it is relatively easy to improve your skillset of any particular tool, language, or environment. The other - not so much
and that is why they are more valuable IMO.

UPDATING A TABLE WITH SAME INFO FROM ANOTHER TABLE ON THE SAME DB

0down votefavorite
I am trying to update a table with info from another table on the same db with same table name. I just want the info to be the same , no primary key or constraint involve just a straight replacement of records and I keep getting errors WITH THE TABLE not
being recignize. below is my query:
UPDATE
VNDFIL
SET EOBTYP
= VNDFIL.EOBTYP,
EDI_X12_835_VERSION = VNDFIL.EDI_X12_835_VERSION
FROM
AGERECOVERY
WHERE
VNDFIL.EOBTYP
= VNDFIL.EOBTYP
AND
VNDFIL
.EDI_X12_835_VERSION
= VNDFIL.EDI_X12_835_VERSION

Hi rotary,
If those two same named tables are in the same database then they have to be in different schemas. If you mean they are in the same server instance, then they may be in different databases, besides the "table not being recognized" error,
anyway you should use the fully qualified table names, that is database.Schema.Table(If across instances, ServerName should be prefixed) to avoid the table unrecognized error.
Using Identifiers As Object Names
With the fully qualified names, your update statement can be like below.
UPDATE
db1.schema1.VNDFIL
SET EOBTYP = srcTbl.EOBTYP, EDI_X12_835_VERSION = srcTbl.EDI_X12_835_VERSION
FROM
db1.schema2.VNDFIL srcTbl
WHERE
db1.schema1.VNDFIL.EOBTYP = srcTbl.VNDFIL.EOBTYP AND
db1.schema1.VNDFIL.EDI_X12_835_VERSION = srcTbl.VNDFIL.EDI_X12_835_VERSION
If you have any question, feel free to let me know.
Eric Zhang
TechNet Community Support

How to update two tables with trigger

Hi:
how to update two tables with trigger ?
I have two tables :
(1)ASIA
MI number;
(2)ASIA_P
ID number;
When I insert a new value into the asia.MI ,I also can
insert the same value into the asia_p.id field.
I have write a trigger as follows but it does't work.
create or replace trigger MI_TRG
before insert on asia
for each row
declare
seq number;
begin
select MI_SEQ.Nextval into seq from dual;
:new.MI:=seq;
insert into ASIA_PRO(MI_ID)
values
(seq);
end MI_TRG;
How to realize it ?
thanks
zzm

Why do you say it does not work?

Why should avoid OLTP compression on tables with massive update/insert?

Dear expert,
We are planning oracle OLTP compression on a IS-U system, could you tell me
Why should avoid OLTP compression on tables with massive update/insert?
What kind of impact on the performance in the worst case?
Best regards,
Kate

Hi
When updating compressed data Oracle has to read it, uncompress it and update it.
The compression is then performed again later asynchronously. This does require a lot more CPU than for a simple update.
An other drawback is that compression on highly modified tables will generate a major increase in redo / undo log generation. I've experienced it on an DB where RFC tables where by mistake compressed, the redo increase was over 15%.
Check the remark at the end of Jonathan Lewis post.
Regards
http://allthingsoracle.com/compression-in-oracle-part-3-oltp-compression/
Possibly this is all part of the trade-off that helps to explain why Oracle doesn't end up compressing the last few rows that get inserted into the block.
The effect can be investigated fairly easily by inserting about 250 rows into the empty table - we see Oracle inserting 90 rows, then generating a lot of undo and redo as it compresses those 90 rows; then we insert another 40 rows, then generate a lot of undo and redo compressing the 130 rows. Ultimately, by the time the block is full we have processed the first 90 rows into the undo and redo four or five times.

Recordset - updating 2 tables with 1 recordset using application object update record

I have a recordset that uses a field from 2 different tables
with a select statement where clause that joins a userid. I can
display the field’s data just fine. Now I want to use the
Application object “update record” so I can modify
either of the fields. The problem is the Application object
“update record” only allows you to update one table.
How does Dreamweaver mx 2004 allow me to update 2 tables with one
recordset and 1 submit button? Currently using php.
Example of where:
Where member.userid = member_detail.userid
I tried creating the one form with the field from the first
table and that works just fine. I added the other field from the
other table into the form but ofcourse there isn’t any code
that will update the second table so it won’t work.
My application requires me to update alot of fields between 2
tables at the same time.
Does anyone know a way using Dreamweaver mx 2004 to do this?
I don’t have much php experience.

jon-rookie wrote:
> DreamerJim,
>
> I am sorry but I don't think you are correct. I just
can't believe that with
> all the powers to be at Macromedia and now Adobe can't
figure out how to update
> two tables at once. There are millions of db's out there
that require this. I
> spent several hours today perusing lots of posts on the
internet. It seems I
> am not the only one out there that has asked this
question. Unfortunately
> there are no good answers yet to my surprise.
>
> I did find a Dreamweaver extension that does exactly
what I myself and many
> others want. The problem is it is no longer available
unless you purchase a
> bundle of software from Adobe.
>
> I have not looked into it in detail so I am not 100%
sure that is accurate!
>
> Still, alot of php programmers do this all the time
without much trouble. I
> just want to know if Dreamweaver mx 2004 has the
capability if a person knows
> the right steps.
>
> Hopefully a Dreamweaver expert will post something to
let us know for sure.
> Until then I am stuck.
>
Not even CS3 has this built in, you will either have to code
it yourself
or buy the extension you have found. Dreamweaver gives you
basic
features to help you develop applications, but if you want to
do
anything really clever you have to do it yourself.
One thing to consider is maybe creating an SQL view that is
can be
updated. I am pretty sure it exists, then you use the view
instead of
the table in the update behaviour. I have never done it
myself, but I am
sure it can be done.
Steve

Update trigger fails with value too large for column error on timestamp

Hello there,
I've got a problem with several update triggers. I've several triggers monitoring a set of tables.
Upon each update the updated data is compared with the current values in the table columns.
If different values are detected the update timestamp is set with the current_timestamp. That
way we have a timestamp that reflects real changes in relevant data. I attached an example for
that kind of trigger below. The triggers on each monitored table only differ in the columns that
are compared.
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER T_ava01_obj_cont
BEFORE UPDATE on ava01_obj_cont
FOR EACH ROW
DECLARE
v_changed boolean := false;
BEGIN
IF NOT v_changed THEN
    v_changed := (:old.cr_adv_id IS NULL AND :new.cr_adv_id IS NOT NULL) OR
                 (:old.cr_adv_id IS NOT NULL AND :new.cr_adv_id IS NULL)OR
                 (:old.cr_adv_id IS NOT NULL AND :new.cr_adv_id IS NOT NULL AND :old.cr_adv_id != :new.cr_adv_id);
END IF;
IF NOT v_changed THEN
    v_changed := (:old.is_euzins_relevant IS NULL AND :new.is_euzins_relevant IS NOT NULL) OR
                 (:old.is_euzins_relevant IS NOT NULL AND :new.is_euzins_relevant IS NULL)OR
                 (:old.is_euzins_relevant IS NOT NULL AND :new.is_euzins_relevant IS NOT NULL AND :old.is_euzins_relevant != :new.is_euzins_relevant);
END IF;
[.. more values being compared ..]
    IF v_changed THEN
    :new.update_ts := current_timestamp;
END IF;
END T_ava01_obj_cont;Really relevant is the statement
:new.update_ts := current_timestamp;So far so good. The problem is, it works the most of time. Only sometimes it fails with the following error:
SQL state [72000]; error code [12899]; ORA-12899: value too large for column "LGT_CLASS_AVALOQ"."AVA01_OBJ_CONT"."UPDATE_TS"
(actual: 28, maximum: 11)
I can't see how the value systimestamp or current_timestamp (I tried both) should be too large for
a column defined as TIMESTAMP(6). We've got tables where more updates occur then elsewhere.
Thats where the most of the errors pop up. Other tables with fewer updates show errors only
sporadicly or even never. I can't see a kind of error pattern. It's like that every 10.000th update
or less failes.
I was desperate enough to try some language dependend transformation like
IF v_changed THEN
    l_update_date := systimestamp || '';
    select value into l_timestamp_format from nls_database_parameters where parameter = 'NLS_TIMESTAMP_TZ_FORMAT';
    :new.update_ts := to_timestamp_tz(l_update_date, l_timestamp_format);
END IF;to be sure the format is right. It didn't change a thing.
We are using Oracle Version 10.2.0.4.0 Production.
Did anyone encounter that kind of behaviour and solve it? I'm now pretty certain that it has to
be an oracle bug. What is the forum's opinion on that? Would you suggest to file a bug report?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Kind regards
Jan

Could you please edit your post and use formatting and tags. This is pretty much unreadable and the forum boogered up some of your code.
Instructions are here: http://forums.oracle.com/forums/help.jspa

Update multiple columns with single update statement..

HI all,
i am reading the columns value from different table but i want to update it with signle update statement..
such as how to update multiple columns (50 columns) of table with single update statement .. is there any sql statement available i know it how to do with pl/sql..

As I understood, may be this. Here i am updating ename,sal, comm columns all at once.
SQL> select * from emp where empno=7369;
     EMPNO ENAME      JOB              MGR HIREDATE                   SAL       COMM     DEPTNO
      7369 SMITH      CLERK           7902 17/12/1980 12:00:00        800                    20
SQL> UPDATE emp
2     SET ename = lower (ename),
3         sal = sal + 1000,
4         comm = 100
5   WHERE empno = 7369;
1 row updated.
SQL> select * from emp where empno=7369;
     EMPNO ENAME      JOB              MGR HIREDATE                   SAL       COMM     DEPTNO
      7369 smith      CLERK           7902 17/12/1980 12:00:00       1800        100         20
SQL> UPDATE emp
2     SET ename = (SELECT 'ABCD' FROM DUAL),
3         sal = (SELECT 1000 FROM DUAL),
4         comm = (SELECT 100 FROM DUAL)
5   WHERE empno = 7369;
1 row updated.

Progammatic update a table with a database view in the page

Hi All,
I am using JDev 11g. With FOD database schema, I have one database view Products which comes from two tables Products_Base and Product_Transactions. I created three EOs (ProductEO, ProductsBaseEO, ProductTransactionsEO) and three VOs (ProductVO, ProductsBaseVO, ProductTransactionsVO) based on their EOs respectively.
Here is my scenario. I have an ADF form which is based on the database view Products and is dragged and dropped from Data Controls->ProductVO. When an existing record is submitted, a backing bean method will be called to update the data against the table Products_Base (and the table Product_Transactions at the same time) programmatically. An update method updateProductPrice() is added into the Application Module and published it to UI Client. The submit button in the page is created by directly dragging and dropping Data Controls->updateProductPrice into the page. When I run it, I got the following error message,
Failed to post data to database during "Update": SQL Statement "UPDATE PRODUCTS ProductEO SET COST_PRICE=:1 WHERE PRODUCT_ID=:2".
What I don't understand here is that, in my update method updateProductPrice(), it supposes to update the table Products_Base. But from the error, it appears that it is trying to update the view Products. Can anyone give me a help on what I did wrong here? When I try to debug it, it throws an exception to this line in the method updateProductPrice(),
getDBTransaction().commit();
Here are my codes,
The method which got called in the backing bean
public String cb6_action() {
DCBindingContainer bc = (DCBindingContainer)getBindings();
FacesCtrlAttrsBinding ProductId = (FacesCtrlAttrsBinding)bc.get("ProductId");
FacesCtrlAttrsBinding CostPrice = (FacesCtrlAttrsBinding)bc.get("CostPrice");
JUCtrlActionBinding action =
(JUCtrlActionBinding)bc.findCtrlBinding("updateProductPrice");
DCDataControl dc = action.getDataControl();
ApplicationModule am = (ApplicationModule)dc.getDataProvider();
AppModule service = (AppModule)am;
service.updateProductPrice(new Long(ProductId.toString()), CostPrice.toString());
return null;
public BindingContainer getBindings() {
return BindingContext.getCurrent().getCurrentBindingsEntry();
The update method defined in the Application module (AppModuleImpl.java)
public void updateProductPrice(long productId, String costPrice) {
ProductsBaseEOImpl product = retrieveProductById(productId);
if (product != null) {
try {
product.setCostPrice(new Number(costPrice));
getDBTransaction().commit();
catch (JboException ex) {
getDBTransaction().rollback();
throw ex;
catch (SQLException ex1) {
getDBTransaction().rollback();
private ProductsBaseEOImpl retrieveProductById(long productId) {
EntityDefImpl productDef = ProductsBaseEOImpl.getDefinitionObject();
Key productKey = ProductsBaseEOImpl.createPrimaryKey(new DBSequence(productId));
return (ProductsBaseEOImpl)productDef.findByPrimaryKey(getDBTransaction(),productKey);
Edited by: john wang on Oct 27, 2009 7:14 AM

or
merge into test
using (select rowid rid
            , id
            , sub_id
            , startdate
            , lead (startdate) over (order by id, sub_id) - 1 ed
       from test) x
on (x.rid = test.rowid)
when matched then
   update set end_date = x.ed
;

[ADF BC | ADF Faces] Updating a table with values updated in transaction

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for