Adobe SEND - Contact email addresses lost during SendNow to Send conversion. In addition, SEND does not remember email addresses. Boooo!

Why would Adobe ignore such a convenient feature.
It's a hassle to keep on entering the sale email addresses over and over again.

Hi,
According to the error message, outlook.com block your IP address. This may be caused by that your Exchange server was affected by some malware and send out many junk emails. Thus, I recommend you apply more Exchange server protection method:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb691338(v=exchg.141).aspx
And you can use Sender Filter agent to block messages:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124354(v=exchg.141).aspx
Additionally, We understand the issue brings troubles and inconveniences to you. However, since your account is blocked by Outlook.com, We’d better post the issue on Outlook.com Forum for more help:
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windowslive/forum/liveid?tm=1362616605225&auth=1
Thanks for your understanding in advance.
Best regards,
Angela Shi
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

Adobe send does not remember email addresses

The new adobe send does not remember email addresses. Is there a way to make it?

Hi remembering email address,
If you're using Send via Adobe Reader, you can take advantage of your local contact list. Please see I’m trying to send a file from Adobe Reader, but I can’t access my computer’s address book to find my contacts. Why not? for more information about that feature.
Best,
Sara

Why does Adobe sendnow work and the newest and greatest Adobe Send does not work?

Why does Adobe sendnow work and the newest and greatest Adobe Send does not work? I wasted about 8 hours on trying to get Adobe Send to upload 269 files that amounted to 469MB. When it did not work I made a zip file and after a lot of wasted run time that did not work. The first situation gives little indication of when a file is loaded compared to Adobe SendNow. In both cases with Send it failed with a message like only the first 50 can be loaded. When I went and looked none of them had been loaded. With the zip file (I wanted to hide the individual files so they would not be counted) it appeared to work but very slowly and finally said it was done and I went and looked and it had done anything for oever 2 hours except a false "I'm runninng" indication.
Thus, I took a chance with Adobe SendNow and it works great. It never gave me a limit on the amount of files nor on the size of the complete job. It shows me one file at a time when it has finished with the file uploading it. SendNow has never given me any problems.
Why woiuld you want to change the program from SendNow to Send without the newest program being the best, fastest, user friendly program of the two? It just doesn't make sense to me. I suggest that Adobe keep SendNow working until Send is fixed. I would also suggest that SendNow and how it looks be kept, called Send, then modify Send one thing at a time until you get it to the point you need it to be for Acrobat. I have heard nothing good and now I have experienced it that Send is a piece of junk. I wasted most of my work day on giving Adobe the benefit of the doubt to find out I made a very bad decision to trust Adobe to make good decisions on the transfer of a function to another place .... both Adobe's responsibility.without making it painless for your customers that totally rely on you. Don't throw away customer confidence as it is very hard to get it back.

Funny how you answer to "troll". (What's your handle on AT&T forums?)
Yep! Verizon living up to it's contractual obligations by not releasing updates. Caveat emptor!
I think there are some reasonable expectations here to keep customer's happy. When one carrier offers upgrades there is an expectation the same will happen across all the carriers. We have seen that except Big Red.
Verizon could have said the update is in MS court months ago and stilled the voice of the disgruntled, or at least redirected it, but instead chose to be silent. Not for market share but for partial blame I think.
We will have to agree to disagree since you only see Terms & Conditions and I, see customer satisfaction.

Adobe send does not work

5 attempts to upload a file of less than 200MB using Firefox & IE and when the file upload reaches 100% an error message flashes the file could not be uploaded, a really poor show from a company as big as adobe I have cancelled my auto renewal & won't be purchasing any your more expensive cloud based services.

Sara,
You wrote" Please let us know if we can ever be further assistance."
How on earth did this situation ever occur? Did it occur to anyone at Adobe to actually test the product before letting it escape? This situation is not only an embarrassment, it speaks to an absolute level of incompetence that reflects poorly on a company that doesn't need any added customer frustration.
You wrote
" Adobe Engineering is actively working on improving the Adobe Send online service so that it can handle larger uploads with the same ease as Adobe SendNow" Do you understand how lame that sounds? The whole purpose of "Send" was to allow for sending larger uploads... Adobe "Engineering" might have worked on improving that feature before releasing the program .... The original comment was on July 4, today is July 30 and clearly what ever excuse you have for "engineering" doesn't have a clue.....
Regards,
Tom Lianza

SOST Repeat Send does not ask for new fax number or e-mail address.

SOST Repeat Send does not ask for new fax number or e-mail address. It does work for one user but not for any others. It is supposed to ask you if you want to change the fax number or e-mail address if you were the user that sent the document. Does anyone know if there are settings that control this somewhere? Using SAP R/3 vers. 4.7

Dear Friends,
Normally, we can change the receipient address, if we send. We can not change the receipient address of another user.
Check Note 685164 - Resending with recipient change.
As per this note Go to SM30 and add parameter "SOST_REC_CHANGE" value "X" in view "SXPARAMS".
Now, if you click "repeat send" icon, it will ask below two option in dialog box:
The message is sent again. You can change the recipient before
sending. The sent message then appears as a
as a new send request in the list
Send to same recipients again
Change recipients before sending
It is working to me ....
Thanks & Regards,
Rajagopal
Chennai - INDIA.

Have been trying all weekend to upload Jpegs- either Send does not work or shows files uploading then shows error- never had this problem with Send Now-16 images total size 92MB-largest image 13MB

Have been trying all weekend to upload Jpegs- either Send does not work or shows files uploading then shows error- never had this problem with Send Now-16 images total size 92MB-largest image 13MB

Hi Ciaran19,
Are you sending files from the Adobe Send interface, Adobe Reader, or the Outlook plug-in?
Have you checked to see whether the files that you're sending appear in the Recent Files/Sent Files list when you're logged on to https://cloud.acrobat.com? (It could be that they're uploading, but not being sent.)
It would also be worthwhile to send the files in smaller batches, to see whether a particular file or files is problematic, and causing the error.
Please let us know how it goes. If you're still having trouble, please let us know where you're sending from, and whether you're able to send the files in smaller batches. It would also be helpful to know the exact error message that you're receiving.
Best,
Sara

Received adobe photoshop elements 12/adobe premiere elements 12 when I purchased a MacBook Pro. The macBook Pro does not have a DVD player it is sold separately. To install the program can I download a free trial version and then use the serial numb

Received adobe photoshop elements 12/adobe premiere elements 12 when I purchased a MacBook Pro. The macBook Pro does not have a DVD player it is sold separately. To install the program can I download a free trial version and then use the serial numbers from the set I received?

yes, that's exactly what you should do,
Downloads available:
Suites and Programs: CC | CS6 | CS5.5 | CS5 | CS4 | CS3
Acrobat: XI, X | 9,8 | 9 standard
Premiere Elements: 12 | 11, 10 | 9, 8, 7
Photoshop Elements: 12 | 11, 10 | 9,8,7
Lightroom: 5 | 4 | 3
Captivate: 7 | 6 | 5
Contribute: CS5 | CS4, CS3
Download and installation help for Adobe links
Download and installation help for Prodesigntools links are listed on most linked pages. They are critical; especially steps 1, 2 and 3. If you click a link that does not have those steps listed, open a second window using the Lightroom 3 link to see those 'Important Instructions'.

I have Adobe photoshop cs5. need to update camera raw, cause my camera raw is 2010and does not read my camera, I went out and downloaded the new one and it does not link to adobe photoshop cs5

I have moved my Photoshop CS5 to my traveling computer,a Surface Pro 3. I have photoshop loaded but in trying to look at raw images it says my camera raw does not support the sony alpha 65 which is what I have. I went out and tried to download the newest raw version and even went out and did a zipfile download and it will not update my current version. What should I do

I have 6.0. Tried to download newest verion and it will not download. Went out and then downloaded a zipfile and it still will not download, thus cannot look at my raw pictures.
Thanks, John
m: gener7
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 6:01 PM
To: JOHN STAHLY
Subject: I have Adobe photoshop cs5. need to update camera raw, cause my camera raw is 2010and does not read my camera, I went out and downloaded the new one and it does not link to adobe photoshop cs5
I have Adobe photoshop cs5. need to update camera raw, cause my camera raw is 2010and does not read my camera, I went out and downloaded the new one and it does not link to adobe photoshop cs5
created by gener7 <https://forums.adobe.com/people/gener7> in Photoshop General Discussion - View the full discussion <https://forums.adobe.com/message/7007148#7007148>

Adobe form created in LiveCycle does not remember user input

Adobe form created in LiveCycle does not remember user input when the file has been re-opened after it has been saved.
Example:
"Check box" that has been selected and who have registered Action script (may be that it should be disabled), seems to be reset when the file is re-opened, although it apparently is checked.
Are there settings or script that can prevent this?

Hi there,
usually if the values are not kept in form after saving and re-opening the form, it would be because of your code... or because it is not Reader Extended PDF...
If your code has a function which is to return a value to your field without it to be working based on your Design, it will reset any data..(variables)
Which means...
e.g.: You have an array/var/JSONobject which you populate varying on the data entered in the design, as long as you are in the actual form, without closing and re-opening the form, it will keep all values inside that array / variables / JSONobject. But, once the form closed and re-opened, if you have a function that returns a value to your field, whatever the field, from any variable in the script it will return nothing because every variables are reset. To avoid such a thing, you must repopulate all variables that were assigned previously before closing the PDF Form. To do so, I recommend to have a page(hidden) which contains every important values according to that function and you must repopulate those variables according to the values in the keepVar page...
If you do not have any function that returns a value to a field based on your variables, this is not the solution you are looking for and I am not aware of the reason why it behaves like this... Maybe more information on the behaviour of your form would help locate the issue...
Hope this help

Everytime i try to download it says i need to contact system administrator but i am on system administrator but it still does not download

everytime i try to download it says i need to contact system administrator but i am on system administrator but it still does not download

I suspect you have a 2G iPod. Those can only go to iOS 4.2.1.
Identifying iPod models
iPod touch (3rd generation)
iPod touch (3rd generation) features a 3.5-inch (diagonal) widescreen multi-touch display and 32 GB or 64 GB flash drive. You can browse the web with Safari and watch YouTube videos with Wi-Fi. You can also search, preview, and buy songs from the iTunes Wi-Fi Music Store on iPod touch.
The iPod touch (3rd generation) can be distinguished from iPod touch (2nd generation) by looking at the back of the device. In the text below the engraving, look for the model number. iPod touch (2nd generation) is model A1288, and iPod touch (3rd generation) is model A1318.

HT1338 I am trying to download adobe flash player on to my ipad2 i keep getting this massege that safari does not support this ?

Hi
anyone there
I want to down load adobe flash player to my I pad but a massage show up saying Safari does not support this ?
Anyone there?

No Flash for iPads, iPhones, or iPods
Here's why there's is no Flash available for iDevices or other mobile devices. Adobe was unable to provide a product that was suitable to the needs of battery powered mobile devices used for Internet browsing. Existing Flash technology used too much memory, ate battery life, and was buggy. Simply put Flash did not work well on mobile devices.
Apple's Steve Jobs led the escape from Flash dependency when Apple introduced the iPhone, and later introduced the iPad. There was a hue and cry over the omission. Time proved Jobs was right on target.
So this is why there is no Flash for your iPhone or iPad or iPod nor for most SmartPhones. Flash has been abandoned by many sites in favor of supported technologies such as HTML5 or by providing their own custom app.
Here is Steve Jobs official comment on his momentous decision to omit Flash from iDevices: Steve Jobs on Flash.
Here is Adobe's later announcement to cease development of Flash for mobile devices: Adobe on Mobile Flash.
Now, you are not necessarily out on a limb. There are some apps that can display some Flash, but don't count on there ability to display anything using Flash.
Apps that can display some Flash from the Web:
Puffin
SkyFire
Photon Flash
Browse2Go
iSwifter
Also, note that many sites that use Flash provide their own app for accessing their material. So check with your favorite sites and find out if "there's an app for that."

Cannot get into iPad, it keeps wanting me to sign in using old email that does not exist, and for a password that she does not remember, so I am unable to change password. How do I get around this?

Cannot get into old iPad, it keeps wanting me to sign in using old email id that does not exist, and for a password that she does not remember, so I am unable to change password. How do I get around this?

With iOS 7 Activation lock you can't.
iCloud: Activation Lock
http://support.apple.com/kb/PH13695
 Cheers, Tom

HTMLDB_MAIL.SEND does not work with 11g

Hi Guys,
I have a simple application that uses HTMLDB_MAIL.SEND. I am running APEX 3.0 against an 11g database. When run against a 10g DB all is good. But with 11g I get
ORA-24247: network access denied by access control list (ACL)
I looked up the error which recommends altering ACL stuff, which I know nothing about. Is there a simple way to get rid of this error.
O.

Hi,
I have the same problem as you.
Colud you please explain me how did you resolve it.
Thanks
HTMLDB_MAIL.SEND does not work with 11g

Why DDL during SELECT is possible. Or why SELECT does not put a table lock?

This is a question to people who really knows Oracle internals or/and RDB theory.
(The question is relocated from another thread for not hijacking on that's original question.)
Why DDL during SELECT is possible? Or why SELECT does not put TM 2 Row Shared lock on table(s)?
This not locking causes a possibility while one session is running a long select, another can truncate and even drop table(s) that are being read by the first session.
I think, humbly assume, that Oracle does not put TM 2 lock on tables, that are being simply SELECTed, by some significant technical reason. But I do not know this reason. If somebody knows please shed a light.
Also, if you know that this behavior is totally correct from perspective of RDB theory, please explain me.
I'll try to explain my point.
It is a matter of data consistency and integrity that is supported in Oracle everywhere except this place.
a) If one session is reading data from moment T and other session changes data on its way at moment T1, the first session wont read that changed data, it will read the data that was there on moment T.
This is declared as Read Consistency principle.
b) If one session is changing data, and another session tries to truncate or drop table - the second session will fail with error ORA-00054: resource busy and acquire with NOWAIT specified.
This is declared as Data Integrity principle.
c) But why not to follow the above principles in case when one session reads data and another session tries to truncate or drop table (or do other DDL operations)?
It is counter-intuitive. Why not to put TM 2 (SS) lock during SELECT execution that would prevent DDLs on this table?
What I only can assume is that this is only because some technical difficulty or limitation.
What is this limitation or other reason in favor of which Oracle sacrificed consistency in this case?

user11181920 wrote:
Aman,
There was no need to clarify how DML lock works, I know that.
Also I know that in Oracle a Select does not lock neither table rows nor table itself.
The reason I mentioned it because you brought up the word change which is far better suited for DML's than DDL's as the former has a requirement to have its Undo preserved.
Again, my question was why Select does not protect itself by locking table(s), partitions and indexes?Protect from what? There is nothing wrong with doing a select. What would happen with a select doing a lock on the table before being executed in its entirety (forget DDL and DML altogether for a moment) ? State one good reason that there should be a lock for the select. If it has to, it would be always isn't it?
The keyword here is concurrency and that's what is the best when the number of locks obtained are lesser at non-required operations. A select doesn't change anything that's why in Oracle, there is no read-level lock.I am not saying about row locks while reading. They are not needed because Undo resolves concurrency.Only in the case of DML where the change is still active and the buffers are dirty. With a DDL, its an implicit commit.
I am asking why Select does not enqueue one, only one lock per object that participates in the Select?Again, my question back to you is, what good you would get from it? What purpose it would solve?
It is not very expensive, I suppose. But it would protect from DDLs that can destroy the Select's result set. You have seen in your system and in my demo(and that's what the the question was on the other thread also) that the result remains intact and its not a behavior from now. Its the same since the time I have started learning Oracle. Can you explain that why you think that the result of select statement would be wrong for a drop table? I believe, its been stated repeatedly that if the select has no requirement to look back the table, it would get completed. Only if the select needs to access the table again, it would fail. So even if we consider your explanation, there is no wrong result shown at all. Once the session encounters that the table is dropped for the statement, the execution stops right away. So where is the destroyed result?
Yes, it is less dangerous when Select does not lock table comparing with what would happen with DMLs in such case (that is why DMLs protect themselves by TM 3), it affects only the Select and its consumer, but still ... I don't understand this Oracle's decision. What is a reasoning behind it?.As I said, to improve concurrency.
Aman....

Adobe Send is Not Ready To Be Launched

I am a SendNow subscriber who has now been forced to use Send. Tried this morning to send four files in one upload and the recipient is receiving an error when trying to download the individual files.
I enountered errors such as this when I tried Send before, reported it, and assumed Adobe would have the bugs worked out before forcing SendNow subscribers to use this new service. Not sure for the reasons behind discontiniuing SendNow and replacing it, but would hope that Adobe would at least offer a replacement that works properly.
FIx this so that it works properly or bring back SendNow until that time you Send working correctly. Otherwise I will be forced to cancel my subscription because this is not what I contracted for.

I had the same experience initially. But I think the system has improved somewhat with repeated use. Facial recognition is actually quite simple for us humans but not trivial for computers. My system is now useable after several hours of total inputting and correction. I would characterize the feature as a net positive with much input required. I can now view some grouped faces which I would have never thought of creating a separate project, album, or folder for. It presents, for me, a different alternative view of what is in the library.

Adobe SEND - Contact email addresses lost during SendNow to Send conversion. In addition, SEND does not remember email addresses. Boooo!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for