Aggregate Functions in SELECT

Hi Friends,
Is it possible to have an aggregate function while using Inner join and GROUP BY? Its not working for me.
Prompt replies would be rewarded.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Tamilarasan.
Message was edited by: Tamilarasan Lakshmanan

I'm not sure what you mean by 'not working', but you can try something like:
* select data: parked documents in value type 54 (invoice) --------
select fmifiit~knbelnr bkpf~bstat
      count( distinct fmifiit~fmbelnr )
   into (wa_error-belnr, wa_error-bstat, wa_error-count)
   from fmifiit inner join bkpf
      on ( fmifiit~bukrs = bkpf~bukrs and
           fmifiit~kngjahr = bkpf~gjahr and
           fmifiit~knbelnr = bkpf~belnr )
      where fmifiit~knbelnr in s_belnr
        and fmifiit~bukrs = p_bukrs
        and fmifiit~kngjahr = p_gjahr
        and ( fmifiit~wrttp = '54' or
              fmifiit~wrttp = '57' or
              fmifiit~wrttp = '66' )
        and bkpf~bukrs = p_bukrs
        and bkpf~gjahr = p_gjahr
        and bkpf~belnr in s_belnr
        and bkpf~budat in s_budat
        and ( bkpf~bstat = 'V' or bkpf~bstat = 'W' or bkpf~bstat = 'Z' )
      group by fmifiit~knbelnr
               bkpf~bstat
      order by fmifiit~knbelnr.
Rob

Similar Messages

Problem with my aggregate function

Hello there,
I tried to build my own string aggregate function but I've a troubles when I'm using it into my query. When I'm using it, it writes ORA904, whereas this idenfifier exists. Do you know what's wrong ?
here my aggregate function :
create or replace FUNCTION aggme (query_in in VARCHAR2) RETURN VARCHAR2 IS
    incoming    varchar2(4000);
    hold_result varchar2(4000);
    c sys_refcursor;
Begin
    open c for query_in;
    loop
        fetch c into incoming;
        exit when c%notfound;
        hold_result := hold_result||','||incoming;
    end loop;
    return ltrim(hold_result,',');
END;and here my query by using my aggregate function aggme:
select
RES.LASTNAME as "LASTNAME",
RES.FIRSTNAME as "FIRSTNAME",
aggme('select NAME from PATHOLOGY where ID= RES.PATHOLOGY_ID') as "PATHOLOGY"
from
TBK_RESOURCE RES

Mustafa KALAYCI wrote:
I think you wanted to do this:
select
RES.LASTNAME as "LASTNAME",
RES.FIRSTNAME as "FIRSTNAME",
aggme('select NAME from PATHOLOGY where ID=' || RES.PATHOLOGY_ID) as "PATHOLOGY"
from
TBK_RESOURCE RESby the way this is a very very bad idea doing like that. you should look for WM_CONCAT (for db version 11.1 or lower)No. Nobody should use WM_CONCAT. It's an undocumented function that is not supported by Oracle and may be changed in future versions without notice.
All Oracle experts say not to use it, including Tom Kyte... Re: DISTINCT not working with wmsys.wm_concat
Below 11gR2, you should use SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH, or a user defined function, including user defined aggregate functions such as the following example, which aggregates strings into a clob as a result...
create or replace type clobagg_type as object
text clob,
static function ODCIAggregateInitialize(sctx in out clobagg_type) return number,
member function ODCIAggregateIterate(self in out clobagg_type, value in clob) return number,
member function ODCIAggregateTerminate(self in clobagg_type, returnvalue out clob, flags in number) return number,
member function ODCIAggregateMerge(self in out clobagg_type, ctx2 in clobagg_type) return number
create or replace type body clobagg_type is
static function ODCIAggregateInitialize(sctx in out clobagg_type) return number is
begin
    sctx := clobagg_type(null) ;
    return ODCIConst.Success ;
end;
member function ODCIAggregateIterate(self in out clobagg_type, value in clob) return number is
begin
    self.text := self.text || value ;
    return ODCIConst.Success;
end;
member function ODCIAggregateTerminate(self in clobagg_type, returnvalue out clob, flags in number) return number is
begin
    returnValue := self.text;
    return ODCIConst.Success;
end;
member function ODCIAggregateMerge(self in out clobagg_type, ctx2 in clobagg_type) return number is
begin
    self.text := self.text || ctx2.text;
    return ODCIConst.Success;
end;
end;
create or replace function clobagg(input clob) return clob
deterministic
parallel_enable
aggregate using clobagg_type;
SQL> select trim(',' from clobagg(ename||',')) as enames from emp;
ENAMES
SMITH,ALLEN,WARD,JONES,MARTIN,BLAKE,CLARK,SCOTT,KING,TURNER,ADAMS,JAMES,FORD,MILLER
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 with t as
2    (select 'PFL' c1, 0 c2,110 c3 from dual union all
3     select 'LHL', 0 ,111 from dual union all
4     select 'PHL', 1, 111 from dual union all
5     select 'CHL', 2, 111 from dual union all
6     select 'DHL', 0, 112 from dual union all
7     select 'VHL', 1, 112 from dual union all
8     select 'CPHL', 0, 114 from dual union all
9     select 'WDCL', 1, 114 from dual union all
10     select 'AHL' ,2 ,114 from dual union all
11     select 'NFDL', 3, 114 from dual)
12 --
13 -- end of test data
14 --
15 select trim(clobagg(c1||' ')) as c1, c3
16 from (select * from t order by c3, c2)
17 group by c3
18* order by c3
SQL> /
C1                                     C3
PFL                                   110
LHL CHL PHL                           111
DHL VHL                               112
CPHL AHL NFDL WDCL                    114

Using an Aggregate Function in a Sub-SELECT

Ok. I have this Sub-SELECT and I'd like to base my outside query based on the resyult set of my inner Sub-SELECT which contains an Aggregate function.
Is that possible???
Here's the Query...
SELECT *
FROM CUSTPRO.CPM_PND_TRAN_HDR CPMPNDTH
INNER JOIN (SELECT CPMPNDT2.ky_pnd_seq_trans,
CPMPNDT2.id_ba_esco,
CPMPNDT2.ky_ba,
CPMPNDT2.ky_enroll,
MAX(CPMPNDT2.dt_billed_by_css)
FROM CUSTPRO.CPM_PND_TRAN_HDR CPMPNDT2
WHERE CPMPNDT2.ky_pnd_seq_trans IN (6544937)
GROUP BY CPMPNDT2.ky_pnd_seq_trans,
CPMPNDT2.id_ba_esco,
CPMPNDT2.ky_ba,
CPMPNDT2.ky_enroll) DERIVE1
ON CPMPNDTH.id_ba_esco = DERIVE1.id_ba_esco
AND CPMPNDTH.ky_ba = DERIVE1.ky_ba
AND CPMPNDTH.ky_enroll = DERIVE1.ky_enroll
AND CPMPNDTH.dt_billed_by_css = ????DERIVE1.MAX(CPMPNDT2.dt_billed_by_css)???
How can I designate that last qualifier ????....
PSULionRP

You should give your aggregate function a column-alias as in:
SELECT *
FROM   custpro.cpm_pnd_tran_hdr cpmpndth
       INNER JOIN (SELECT   cpmpndt2.ky_pnd_seq_trans,
                            cpmpndt2.id_ba_esco,
                            cpmpndt2.ky_ba,
                            cpmpndt2.ky_enroll,
                            Max(cpmpndt2.dt_billed_by_css) as XXX    -- ADDED THIS.
                   FROM     custpro.cpm_pnd_tran_hdr cpmpndt2
                   WHERE    cpmpndt2.ky_pnd_seq_trans IN (6544937)
                   GROUP BY cpmpndt2.ky_pnd_seq_trans,
                            cpmpndt2.id_ba_esco,
                            cpmpndt2.ky_ba,
                            cpmpndt2.ky_enroll) derive1
         ON cpmpndth.id_ba_esco = derive1.id_ba_esco
            AND cpmpndth.ky_ba = derive1.ky_ba
            AND cpmpndth.ky_enroll = derive1.ky_enroll
            AND cpmpndth.dt_billed_by_css = derive1.XXX
/

Aggregate functions and normal function in SELECT statement

hi
i am using MS Access DataBase ...
i have lot of integer coloumns in my Database
i want to retrieve the coloumn values as well as the min , max and avg of that coloumn
i dont know whether its possible to do in a single statement or not
generally if we retrieve the values of a particular coloum
we say " SELECT length FROM TABLENAME WHERE somecondition"
and then get the values as int len = rs.getInt("length")..... over a loop
but how to retieve the value of an aggregate function?
like if i say "SELECT avg(colname),max(colname),min(colname) FROM TABLENAME WHERE somecondition"
how do i retrieve this value ???
i dont know if its possible or not ....pls help.........

Give names too each column
SELECT avg(colname) average,max(colname) max,....
and then rs.getInt("average")
This works in Oracle and Sybase, not sure on MS access tough

Group By Select Statement aggregate function error.

I am using Dreamweaver MX4 and have an ASP web page. I can easily do this in Access 2007 a simple "group by" sum totals statement.
Why can I not get this to work on a web page? Are the "#" signs messing this up in the Code2 Select Statement?
How can I get Code2 to work correctly? Code1 works fine. A user enters the customer and a date range on a form and submits request. I get error message in Dreamweaver. You tried to execute a query where the specified expression field3 is not part of an aggregate function
Code1. This works fine SELECT Field3, Field10, SUM(Field16) as SumofField16 FROM CustomerHistory_CP WHERE Field3 LIKE '%Search_Criteria%' AND Field6 >= #1/2/09# AND Field6 <= #1/30/09# GROUP BY Field3, Field10
Code2. I get error message SELECT Field3, Field10, SUM(Field16) as SumofField16 FROM CustomerHistory_CP WHERE Field3 LIKE '%Search_Criteria%' AND Field6 >= #Date1# AND Field6 <= #Date2# GROUP BY Field3, Field10

I am using Dreamweaver MX4 and have an ASP web page. I can easily do this in Access 2007 a simple "group by" sum totals statement.
Why can I not get this to work on a web page? Are the "#" signs messing this up in the Code2 Select Statement?
How can I get Code2 to work correctly? Code1 works fine. A user enters the customer and a date range on a form and submits request. I get error message in Dreamweaver. You tried to execute a query where the specified expression field3 is not part of an aggregate function
Code1. This works fine SELECT Field3, Field10, SUM(Field16) as SumofField16 FROM CustomerHistory_CP WHERE Field3 LIKE '%Search_Criteria%' AND Field6 >= #1/2/09# AND Field6 <= #1/30/09# GROUP BY Field3, Field10
Code2. I get error message SELECT Field3, Field10, SUM(Field16) as SumofField16 FROM CustomerHistory_CP WHERE Field3 LIKE '%Search_Criteria%' AND Field6 >= #Date1# AND Field6 <= #Date2# GROUP BY Field3, Field10

Select into aggregate function

Hi,
I have the following PL/SQL block that I am testing. The block reads a list of values from a local file and inserts the values into a select statement that uses an aggregate function. Here is my code:
DECLARE
f utl_file.file_type;
n COLa%TYPE; --holds values from the file
v COLb%TYPE; --holds value returned by select statement
BEGIN
f := utl_file.fopen(dir,file.txt,'R');
loop -- loop through file
     utl_file.get_line(f,n);
     if length(n) <> 0 then
          SELECT max(A0.COLa) into v
          FROM (SELECT AOB.COLa, A0.COLb
          FROM TAB1 A0,TAB2 A0B
          WHERE (A0.PK=A0B.PK) and A0B.COLa = n) A0;
          IF SQL%rowcount = 0 THEN
               dbms_output.put_line('no rows);
          else
               dbms_output.put_line(v);
          end if;
     end if;
end loop;
     utl_file.fclose(f);
end;
Here is the error I get:
declare
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01403: no data found
ORA-06512: at "SYS.UTL_FILE", line 98
ORA-06512: at "SYS.UTL_FILE", line 656
ORA-06512: at line 12
I checked the database for the first couple of values in the list and got rows. I also ran a simple PL/sql code to print values in the file successfully. So I dont know why it is returning no data found. From what I understand select into statement using aggregate functions will never raise this exception, so why I am getting this error?
Thanks.

Hi,
Actually, the SELECT ... INTO isn't the problem here.
Look at the error message:
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01403: no data found
ORA-06512: at "SYS.UTL_FILE", line 98
ORA-06512: at "SYS.UTL_FILE", line 656
ORA-06512: at line 12The error is ocurring inside utl_file, which is being called at line 12 of your code. (That must be
utl_file.get_line(f,n);)
Utl_file.get_line raises NO_DATA_FOUND when it reaches the end of the file. (If it didn't you'd have an infinite loop, since your code doesn't have any exit strategy.)
You can put the call to get_line in its won BEGIN-EXCEPTION-END block, and trap the NO_DATA_FOUND error.
For example:
end_of_file := 0;
WHILE end_of_file = 0;
loop -- loop through file
    BEGIN
        utl_file.get_line(f,n);
        if length(n) != 0 then          -- Use !=, because you can't post <> on this site
            SELECT max(A0B.COLa)     -- No sub-query needed
            into    v
            FROM    TAB1 A0
            ,         TAB2 A0B
            WHERE   (A0.PK   = A0B.PK)
            and         A0B.COLa = n;
            IF SQL%rowcount = 0 THEN     -- Not needed: SELECT MAX ... without GROUP BY always returns 1 row
                dbms_output.put_line('no rows);
            else
                dbms_output.put_line(v);
            end if;
        end if;
    EXCEPTION
        WHEN NO_DATA_FOUND
        THEN
            end_of_file = 1;
    END;
end loop;Edited by: Frank Kulash on Jul 17, 2009 2:51 PM

Suggest me less expensive SELECT for aggregate function.

Hi,
I hv a SELECT statement with AGGREGATE function, but, as aggregates are expensive, so, want to replace it with less expensive SELECT statement, so, pls. let me know it, Wht can i use instaed, code is as below,
CLEAR my_amount.
SELECT SUM( wrbtr ) into my_amount from BSID
                          WHERE bukrs = p_bukrs
                          and   kunnr = p_konto
                          and   budat <= sy-datum.
so, pls. let me know alternative(replace) SELECT which is less expensive performence wise
thank you

>
M_S_Raju_0613 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hv a SELECT statement with AGGREGATE function, but, as aggregates are expensive, so, want to replace it with less expensive SELECT statement, so, pls. let me know it, Wht can i use instaed, code is as below,
>
>
CLEAR my_amount.
>   SELECT SUM( wrbtr ) into my_amount from BSID
>                           WHERE bukrs = p_bukrs
>                           and   kunnr = p_konto
>                           and   budat <= sy-datum.
>
> so, pls. let me know alternative(replace) SELECT which is less expensive performence wise
>
> thank you
I don't think using SUM is a bad thing to do if you're using an index. The only replacement would be to select all the data into an itab and add it up yourself and I don't think that doing this would be any quicker - it might even be slower because you would be bringing back more records rather than restricting the number of records brought back at database level which is what the SUM would do. The thing I'd be concerned about here is that you're not taking acount of the SHKZG debit / credit flag. But if all the lines you're dealing are credits or all are debits that won't matter to you.

Selecting both a aggregate function and another field

I am trying to do something very simple but I am not sure of the syntax.
I would like to select all of the petid's and find the count of the pets in a given city, both from the same table, Pets.
Can somebody please help me with this?
Thanks

Hi,
An aggregate function will give you one row of output per group.
For example, if you use the aggregate COUNT function to get the total number of rows in a whole table, then you can only have one row of output, representing the whole table, so, if I understand the problem, you can't (easily) use an aggregate function.
Almost all of the aggregate functions have analytic counterparts, that can produce the same results without collapsing the result set into one row per group.
I think this is what you requested:
SELECT petid
,       COUNT (*) OVER (PARTITION BY 1) AS total_cnt
FROM    pets
WHERE   city    = 'Paris' -- or whatever
;Sorry, I'm not at a database now, so I can't check, but I think you don't need the PARTITION BY clause, so you can also say:
,       COUNT (*) OVER () AS total_cntThe keyword OVER marks this as an analytic, rather than an aggregate, function.

Trying to create a Histogram type/object for aggregate functions

Hi,
I am trying to create an aggregate function that will return a histogram
type.
It doesn't have to be an object that is returned, I don't mind returning
a string but I would like to keep the associative array (or something
else indexed by varchar2) as a static variable between iterations.
I started out with the SecondMax example in
http://www.csis.gvsu.edu/GeneralInfo/Oracle/appdev.920/a96595/dci11agg.htm#1004821
But even seems that even a simpler aggregate function like one strCat
below (which works) has problems because I get multiple permutations for
every combination. The natural way to solve this would be to create an
associative array as a static variable as part of the Histogram (see
code below). However, apparently Oracle refuses to accept associate
arrays in this context (PLS-00355 use of pl/sql table not allowed in
this context).
If there is no easy way to do the histogram quickly can we at least get
something like strCat to work in a specific order with a "partition by
... order by clause"? It seems that even with "PARALLEL_ENABLE"
commented out strCat still calls merge for function calls like:
select hr,qtr, count(tzrwy) rwys,
noam.strCat(cnt) rwycnt,
noam.strCat(tzrwy) config,
sum(cnt) cnt, min(minscore) minscore, max(maxscore) maxscore from
ordrwys group by hr,qtr
Not only does this create duplicate entries in the query result like
"A,B,C" and "A,C,B" it seems that the order in rwycnt and config are not
always the same so a user can not match the results based on their
order.
The difference between my functions and functions like sum and the
secondMax demonstrated in the documentation is that secondMax does not
care about the order in which it gets its arguments and does not need to
maintain an ordered set in order to return the correct results. A good
example of a built in oracle function that does care about all its
arguments and probably has to maintain a similar data structure to the
one I want is the PERCTILE_DISC function. If you can find the code for
that function (or something like it) and forward a reference to me that
in itself would be very helpful.
Thanks,
K.Dingle
CREATE OR REPLACE type Histogram as object
-- TYPE Hist10 IS TABLE OF pls_integer INDEX BY varchar2(10),
-- retval hist10;
-- retval number,
retval noam.const.hist10,
static function ODCIAggregateInitialize (sctx IN OUT Histogram)
return number,
member function ODCIAggregateIterate (self IN OUT Histogram,
value IN varchar2) return number,
member function ODCIAggregateTerminate (self IN Histogram,
returnValue OUT varchar2,
flags IN number) return number,
member function ODCIAggregateMerge (self IN OUT Histogram,
ctx2 IN Histogram) return number
CREATE OR REPLACE type body Histogram is
static function ODCIAggregateInitialize(sctx IN OUT Histogram) return
number is
begin
sctx := const.Hist10();
return ODCIConst.Success;
end;
member function ODCIAggregateIterate(self IN OUT Histogram, value IN
varchar2)
return number is
begin
if self.retval.exist(value)
then self.retval(value):=self.retval(value)+1;
else self.retval(value):=1;
end if;
return ODCIConst.Success;
end;
member function ODCIAggregateTerminate(self IN Histogram,
returnValue OUT varchar2,
flags IN number)
return number is
begin
returnValue := self.retval;
return ODCIConst.Success;
end;
member function ODCIAggregateMerge(self IN OUT Histogram,
ctx2 IN Histogram) return number is
begin
i := ctx2.FIRST; -- get subscript of first element
WHILE i IS NOT NULL LOOP
if self.retval.exist(ctx2(i))
then self.retval(i):=self.retval(i)+ctx2.retval(i);
else self.retval(value):=ctx2.retval(i);
end if;
i := ctx2.NEXT(i); -- get subscript of next element
END LOOP;
return ODCIConst.Success;
end;
end;
CREATE OR REPLACE type stringCat as object
retval varchar2(16383), -- concat of all value to now varchar2, --
highest value seen so far
static function ODCIAggregateInitialize (sctx IN OUT stringCat)
return number,
member function ODCIAggregateIterate (self IN OUT stringCat,
value IN varchar2) return number,
member function ODCIAggregateTerminate (self IN stringCat,
returnValue OUT varchar2,
flags IN number) return number,
member function ODCIAggregateMerge (self IN OUT stringCat,
ctx2 IN stringCat) return number
CREATE OR REPLACE type body stringCat is
static function ODCIAggregateInitialize(sctx IN OUT stringCat) return
number is
begin
sctx := stringCat('');
return ODCIConst.Success;
end;
member function ODCIAggregateIterate(self IN OUT stringCat, value IN
varchar2)
return number is
begin
if self.retval is null
then self.retval:=value;
else self.retval:=self.retval || ',' || value;
end if;
return ODCIConst.Success;
end;
member function ODCIAggregateTerminate(self IN stringCat,
returnValue OUT varchar2,
flags IN number)
return number is
begin
returnValue := self.retval;
return ODCIConst.Success;
end;
member function ODCIAggregateMerge(self IN OUT stringCat,
ctx2 IN stringCat) return number is
begin
self.retval := self.retval || ctx2.retval;
return ODCIConst.Success;
end;
end;
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION StrCat (input varchar2) RETURN varchar2
-- PARALLEL_ENABLE
AGGREGATE USING StringCat;

GraphicsConfiguration is an abstract class. You would need to subclass it. From the line of code you posted, it seems like you are going about things the wrong way. What are you trying to accomplish? Shouldn't this question be posted in the Swing or AWT forum?

Error in using aggregate function in Outer Query in Siebel Analytics

Hi,
When I am using aggregate function in outer query in Siebel Analytics I am facing error.
Error Codes: OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P:OI2DL65P
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 59111] The SQL statement must include a GROUP BY clause. (HY000)
Bellow is the code.
SELECT test1.username saw_0, test1.desg saw_1,COUNT (test2.querydate) saw_2
FROM (SELECT POSITION.CBL username,
POSITION.CBP desg
FROM "CM"
WHERE (POSITION.BPTCD = 'Marketing')
AND (POSITION.EDate =TIMESTAMP '1899-01-01 00:00:00'
) test1,
(SELECT users.UN username,
measures."Query Count" querycount,
measures."Max Total Time" secs,
topic.db dashboardname,
"Query Time".DATE querydate
FROM "Plan"
WHERE (topic."Dashboard Name" IN ('DS'))) test2
WHERE test2.username = LOWER (test1.username)
AND test2.dashboardname = 'DS'
GROUP BY test1.username, test1.desg

Should your query be a valid SQL query?
I can't think that the query you have would be valid in a SQL plus window.
Chris

EJB 3.0: EJBQL aggregate functions not working properly

Hi!
We are experiencing problems when using aggregate functions within EJBQL queries. In my case, we have to use max() function to retrieve the max start_date from a specific table. In order to do this, we wrote the following code:
String strQuery = "select max(o.dt_fim) from Questionario o";
Query queryTeste = em.createQuery(strQuery);
List x = queryTeste.getResultList();
OBS: dt_fim is an Oracle 10g datetime column, with its corresponding entity attribute in Questionario entity class.
AFAIK, the query above should return only one record (object instance) containing the date value, right? However, it brougth a list of the entity objects, corresponding to all records in the table, as we had just run "select o from Questionario o".
Examining the server log we can see this behavior:
[TopLink Fine]:2006.09.12 01:47:55.526--
ServerSession(7119662)--Connection(7048401)--Thread(Thread[ApplicationServerThread-0,5,RequestThreadGroup])
--SELECT ID_QUEST, DT_INICIO, DT_FIM, DS_QUEST, DT_CRIACAO, TP_QUEST, NM_QUEST, COD_SEGMENTO, ID_GRUPO FROM TBBOP_QUEST
Are anyone experiencing this issue?
Is there any workaround?
Any help would be much appreciated, since we need to deploy the application for user testing asap.
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Gustavo
PS: We are using JDeveloper 10.1.3.0.4(SU4)
Message was edited by:
Gustavo Lopes Sobral

The 10.1.3.0 versions of JDeveloper contain our early preview of EJB 3.0 JPA functionality. One limitation is that the query language is not complete (released before the spec was finalized).
You can use TopLink Essentials (JPA Reference implementation) whihc contains a complete compliant implementation of the final specification.
http://otn.oracle.com/jpa
The 10.1.3.1 JDeveloper preview ships with TopLink Essentials.
Doug

Pivot table in BI Publisher: Different aggregate functions in data columns

Hi, everyone!
I`ve got some troubles with pivot table in my rtf-template.
Here is my xml:
<ROWSET>
     <ROW>
          <_BI_SUBRF_MO_._MUN_NAME_>МО Петроградский р-н</_BI_SUBRF_MO_._MUN_NAME_>
          <_BI_PERS_ACCOUNT_CARD_._BI_PAC_NMB_>714000003</_BI_PERS_ACCOUNT_CARD_._BI_PAC_NMB_>
          <_BI_MONTH_DEBET_._BI_DEBET_SUM_>0.0</_BI_MONTH_DEBET_._BI_DEBET_SUM_>
          <_BI_CALENDAR_._YEAR__>2009</_BI_CALENDAR_._YEAR__>
          <_BI_CALENDAR_._MONTH__>8</_BI_CALENDAR_._MONTH__>
     </ROW>
     <ROW>
          <_BI_SUBRF_MO_._MUN_NAME_>МО Петроградский р-н</_BI_SUBRF_MO_._MUN_NAME_>
          <_BI_PERS_ACCOUNT_CARD_._BI_PAC_NMB_>714000004</_BI_PERS_ACCOUNT_CARD_._BI_PAC_NMB_>
          <_BI_MONTH_DEBET_._BI_DEBET_SUM_>165.58</_BI_MONTH_DEBET_._BI_DEBET_SUM_>
          <_BI_CALENDAR_._YEAR__>2009</_BI_CALENDAR_._YEAR__>
          <_BI_CALENDAR_._MONTH__>7</_BI_CALENDAR_._MONTH__>
     </ROW>
     <ROW>
          <_BI_SUBRF_MO_._MUN_NAME_>МО Петроградский р-н</_BI_SUBRF_MO_._MUN_NAME_>
          <_BI_PERS_ACCOUNT_CARD_._BI_PAC_NMB_>714000004</_BI_PERS_ACCOUNT_CARD_._BI_PAC_NMB_>
          <_BI_MONTH_DEBET_._BI_DEBET_SUM_>165.58</_BI_MONTH_DEBET_._BI_DEBET_SUM_>
          <_BI_CALENDAR_._YEAR__>2009</_BI_CALENDAR_._YEAR__>
          <_BI_CALENDAR_._MONTH__>7</_BI_CALENDAR_._MONTH__>
     </ROW>
...... and so on..
</ROWSET>
In the pivot table i`d like to see one row for every BISUBRF_MO_._MUN_NAME_ using BICALENDAR_._YEAR__ and BICALENDAR_._MONTH__ as measures and sum of BIMONTH_DEBET_._BI_DEBET_SUM_ and count of unique (or at least just count of) BIPERS_ACCOUNT_CARD_._BI_PAC_NMB_ in cells.
I create a pivot table using wizard, everything ok except one thing: as i understand, in pivot table for data in rows we can use only one kind of aggregate function e.g. only sum or only count.
Is there any way to use different aggregate functions in data cells?
Thank you

As you can see, when we use crosstab tag we can specify only one aggregate function for data cells.
Is there any way to get in XSL-FO (where we can what really happens) instead of:
<T1>
<xsl:value-of select="sum(current-group()/_BI_PERS_ACCOUNT_CARD_._BI_PAC_UNID_)"/>
</T1>
<T2>
<xsl:value-of select="sum(current-group()/_BI_MONTH_DEBET_._BI_DEBET_SUM_)"/>
</T2>
this
<T1>
<xsl:value-of select="sum(current-group()/_BI_PERS_ACCOUNT_CARD_._BI_PAC_UNID_)"/>
</T1>
<T2>
<xsl:value-of select="count(current-group()/_BI_MONTH_DEBET_._BI_DEBET_SUM_)"/>
</T2>
Edited by: user12115038 on 26.10.2009 8:08

Issue in pivot while using aggregate functions

when I use this below query in oracle sql developer
------------->select sum(round(8.08/0.54,2)*30) from dual.
i am getting result as 448.8.it is a correct value
but i use this below queries in pivot as same like above query i am getting result of doubled value 914.4.
PIVOT
SUM(round(ROUND(sellout,2)/6,2)) AS LAST_6_MON_SELL_OUT,
SUM(ROUND(inventory,2)) AS INVENTORY_INTINS_1,
Sum(round(ROUND(inventory,2)/round(ROUND(sellout,2)/6,2),2)*30) As Stockperday
FOR PRODUCT IN (56,78)
actually i am getting value for SUM(round(ROUND(sellout,2)/6,2)) is 0.54,*SUM(ROUND(inventory,2))* is 8.08 i the above query ,but i am getting wrong value for this aggregate function Sum(round(ROUND(inventory,2)/round(ROUND(sellout,2)/6,2),2)30)* as 914.4.but actual value is 448.8
why this problem.can anybody explain me.why this problem

Try ur luck in 'sql plsql thread'
PL/SQL

Why doesn't PIVOT clause work with COLLECT aggregate function in 11g ?

Hello all !
I am really puzzled as to what is considered an aggregate function in the context of the PIVOT clause in 11g.
I have been toying with quite a few things related to collections lately and this arose as an aside :
CREATE TABLE TEST_COLL
   NODE_ID    VARCHAR2(15 CHAR) NOT NULL,
   NODE_VALUE VARCHAR2(45 CHAR) NOT NULL,
   NODE_LEVEL NUMBER(1)         NOT NULL
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE TREE_NODE AS OBJECT
   NODE_KEY VARCHAR2( 15 CHAR),
   NODE_NAME VARCHAR2(127 CHAR)
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE TREE_NODES AS TABLE OF TREE_NODE NOT NULL;At this stage I am sure we all agree that the query
SELECT NODE_LEVEL,
       CAST(COLLECT(TREE_NODE(NODE_ID, NODE_VALUE)) AS TREE_NODES) AS NODES
FROM TEST_COLL
GROUP BY NODE_LEVEL;is perfectly valid as the COLLECT function is an aggregate function according to the [Official Documentation|http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e10592/functions031.htm#i1271564]
But then, one of the following two queries should work
SELECT CAST(REGION_NODES     AS TREE_NODES) AS REGIONS,
       CAST(DEPARTMENT_NODES AS TREE_NODES) AS DEPARTMENTS,
       CAST(AREA_NODES       AS TREE_NODES) AS AREAS,
       CAST(CENTRE_NODES     AS TREE_NODES) AS CENTRES
FROM (SELECT NODE_LEVEL, TREE_NODE(NODE_ID, NODE_VALUE) AS NODE
          FROM TREE_COLL
PIVOT (COLLECT(NODE) FOR NODE_LEVEL IN (1 AS REGION_NODES,
                                         2 AS DEPARTMENT_NODES,
                                         3 AS AREA_NODES,
                                         4 AS CENTRE_NODES
or (better)
SELECT REGION_NODES     AS REGIONS,
       DEPARTMENT_NODES AS DEPARTMENTS,
       AREA_NODES       AS AREAS,
       CENTRE_NODES     AS CENTRES
FROM (SELECT NODE_LEVEL, TREE_NODE(NODE_ID, NODE_VALUE) AS NODE
          FROM TREE_COLL
PIVOT (CAST(COLLECT(NODE) AS TREE_NODES) FOR NODE_LEVEL IN (1 AS REGION_NODES,
                                                             2 AS DEPARTMENT_NODES,
                                                             3 AS AREA_NODES,
                                                             4 AS CENTRE_NODES
       );yet, both fail with
ORA-56902: expect aggregate function inside pivot operationInvestigating further, I found the same behaviour when using XMLAGG as the aggregate function in the PIVOT clause.
Is this normal ? And if it is, is there any other way to achieve the result I was anticipating ?
My version is
SQL> SELECT BANNER FROM V$VERSION;
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
CORE    11.2.0.3.0      Production
TNS for 64-bit Windows: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.3.0 - ProductionThanks in advance
Best Regards
Philip

Most likely a bug. But you can bypass it by using any other aggregate making sure group consists of a single row and apply collect to a pivoted value. Yes, the cost is double aggregation. And also there is another cost - you would need to create MAP member function otherwise aggreations like MAX/MIN, etc. will not work:
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE TREE_NODE AS OBJECT
   NODE_KEY VARCHAR2( 15 CHAR),
   NODE_NAME VARCHAR2(127 CHAR),
   map member function f return varchar2
Type created.
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE BODY TREE_NODE AS
map member function f return varchar2 is
begin
     return NODE_NAME;
end f;
end;
Type body created.
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE TREE_NODES AS TABLE OF TREE_NODE NOT NULL
Type created.
SQL> select *
2    from test_coll
3 /
NODE_ID NODE_VALUE NODE_LEVEL
1       A                   1
2       B                   2
3       C                   3
4       D                   4
5       E                   1
6       F                   2
7       G                   3
8       H                   4
8 rows selected.
SQL> Now:
SELECT CAST(COLLECT(REGION_NODES)     AS TREE_NODES) AS REGIONS,
       CAST(COLLECT(DEPARTMENT_NODES) AS TREE_NODES) AS DEPARTMENTS,
       CAST(COLLECT(AREA_NODES)       AS TREE_NODES) AS AREAS,
       CAST(COLLECT(CENTRE_NODES)     AS TREE_NODES) AS CENTRES
FROM (
        SELECT ROWID RID,
                NODE_LEVEL,
                TREE_NODE(NODE_ID, NODE_VALUE) AS NODE
          FROM TEST_COLL
PIVOT (MAX(NODE) FOR NODE_LEVEL IN (
                                     1 AS REGION_NODES,
                                     2 AS DEPARTMENT_NODES,
                                     3 AS AREA_NODES,
                                     4 AS CENTRE_NODES
REGIONS(NODE_KEY, NODE_NAME)                         DEPARTMENTS(NODE_KEY, NODE_NAME)                     AREAS(NODE_KEY, NODE_NAME)                           CENTRES(NODE_KEY, NODE_NAME)
TREE_NODES(TREE_NODE('1', 'A'), TREE_NODE('5', 'E')) TREE_NODES(TREE_NODE('6', 'F'), TREE_NODE('2', 'B')) TREE_NODES(TREE_NODE('7', 'G'), TREE_NODE('3', 'C')) TREE_NODES(TREE_NODE('8', 'H'), TREE_NODE('4', 'D'))
SQL> SY.

Any difference between distinct and aggregate function in sql query cost???

Hi,
I have executed many sql stmts patterns- such as:
a) using a single table
b) using two tables, using simple joins or outer joins
but i have not noticed any difference in sql stmts in cost and in execution plan....
Anyway, my colleague insists on that using aggregate function is less costly compared to
distinct....(something i have not confirmed, that's why i beleive that they are exactly the same...)
For the above reffered 1st sql pattern.. we could for example use
select distinct deptno
from emp
select count(*), deptno
from emp
group by deptno select distinct owner, object_type from all_objects
select count(*), owner, object_type from all_objects
group by owner, object_typeHave you found any difference between the two ever...????
Note: I use Ora DB 10g v2.
Thank you,
Sim

distinct and aggregate function are for different uses and may give same result but if u r using aggregate function to get distinct records, it will be expensive...
ex
select distinct deptno from scott.dept;
Statistics
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
2 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
584 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
488 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
4 rows processed
select deptno from scott.emp group by deptno;
Statistics
307 recursive calls
0 db block gets
60 consistent gets
6 physical reads
0 redo size
576 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
488 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
6 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
3 rows processed
Nimish Garg
Software Developer
*(Oracle & ASP.NET)*
Indiamart Intermesh Limited, Noida
To Get Free Oracle & ASP.NET Code Snippets
Follow: http://nimishgarg.blogspot.com

Aggregate Functions in SELECT

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for