Aggregation of Facts based on other Facts

I have two columns of facts.
The first one is Aggregated as "max" of the values for that instance.
Column B has different values but I would want that it too display the aggregated values as the first column, i.e. column A.
Is this possible?
Thanks.

COLUMN A-----------COLUMN B
*1000*--------------------*1000*
800----------------------------500
900----------------------------400
1000---------------------------600
The first column's aggregation is set to Max(Column A).
Even though Column B has completely different values, I desire that it display the aggregated value same as column A. Basically, is there a way to set aggregation for a particular column based on another column in OBIEE? Under aggregation tab --> Based on Dimensions it allows me to select other dimensions, but not other facts into the formula.
Am I doing something wrong?
Thanks
Edited by: 975448 on Dec 21, 2012 6:13 AM
Edited by: 975448 on Dec 21, 2012 6:28 AM

Similar Messages

  • Aggregation On Value Based Hierarchy

    Hi
    I am having a problem with aggregation on value based hierarchy
    Well I have a table which will serve as my fact and dimension table
    It is as follows
    ID     Name     MID     Salary
    0     All          
    1     A     0     10000
    2     B     1     9000
    3     C     1     9000
    4     D     1     9000
    5     E     2     8000
    6     F     2     8000
    I created a value based dimension named EMPLOYEE , with child as ID and parent as MID
    I created a cube EMP_SALARY with a measure salary mapped to the Salary column in Employee
    My expectation here is to see the total salary at every level including the salary at that level
    So let us take employee B as an example. He is the manager for employees E and F
    So what I would like to see at level B is sal of B + sal of E + Sal of F = 9000 + 8000 + 8000 = 25000
    But what I get from the cube is 9000. Now is the above possible ? If so please so provide me suggestions
    I can achieve the same by using the following sql query
    select e1.id,rpad('*',2*level,'*') || e1.name,e1.sal,
    select sum(e2.sal)
    from test_emp e2
    start WITH e2.id = e1.id
    CONNECT by PRIOR e2.id = e2.mid
    ) sum_sal
    from test_emp e1
    start with e1.mid is null
    CONNECT by prior e1.id = e1.mid;

    The same basic problem, along with a solution, was discussed in the following thread.
    Re: Value Based Dimension causing Aggrega                         tion problems

  • Filter Based on other report not working

    Hi Gurus,
    I am using OBIEE 10g.
    I have a Dashboard page in that i have a prompt and 2 reports,(A, B reports). Report B is using the same columns as prompt where as report A not.
    Report A has columns which hold the same data as report B, so i thougt to pass the values based on Report B column using the filter based on other report. I am able to complete it succssfuly but Report A is not having amount of data that i was excepting. When i started investigating i found out that the column which i am using in the prompt and report B have values ( NEW, OLD, NULL) report A able to take the values NEW and OLD but the NULL values are not passing to report A. In report B it is taking null value as it has filter as prompted.
    Is it any way to have the values (NEW, OLD, NULL) in report A?
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards
    Ali

    Hi Deep,
    Thanks for taking time to answer my question.
    I have to display null. If i Mask with something then i dont get proper data in report A, couse in the table it is null.
    Thanks
    Ali

  • How can I make a new genius mix? Apple has made two automatically, but I would like one based on other genres within my iTunes library. I have tried updating my genius mixes to no avail.

    How can I make a new genius mix? I do not want to make a genius playlist. Genius has already created two mixes but I would like another based on other genres within my extensive music library. I have tried updating Genius from Store>Update Genius but to no avail. Thank you!

    Hi. The two user tips both describe a sequence of steps that should get your library from the point where it threatens to wipe data from your device to where it is syncing normally, while recovering as much information as possible. It may still be necessary to wipe and reload the device but this should only take place once all the data that can be recovered has been recovered.
    Doing step 1 of 8 and then complaining things aren't the way you want them to be yet strikes me as premature...
    Since you appear to have all your media content, and we are discussing an iPod classic, not an iOS device, the main worries are already taken care of. What's left is ratings, playcounts, playlist membership and checked status. Since your device holds only part of your library at best you could only recover the missing data for the content that is on the device using third party tools.
    Recreating the previous checked/unchecked status of every track in your library from where you are now may not be that easy. Syncing with selected playlists has many advantages, one of which would have been that you would have a named playlist that could have been retrieved by 3rd party software if you had used this method.
    You haven't explained what caused your problem in the first place, but if you have a Previous iTunes Libraries folder holding old copies of your iTunes database (generated with each iTunes update) then it would be possible to restore the most recent of these and then update the library with any changes in your media folder.
    BTW Apple doesn't offer free support for this kind of issue with iTunes.
    tt2

  • PM Notification - Hide fields based on other field's value

    Hello experts,
    I am looking for an user exit which allows me to hide some fields based on other field's value.
    For example, I have field 1 and field 2. When I open my notification, if the value of field 2 is 'aaa', field 1 has to be hidden.
    There should be an user exit but I can't find it...
    Thanks for your help!

    Hi everyone,
    Any thoughts? any help is appreciated...
    Thanks

  • How to insert into date column based on other columns?

    Hi
    I have four columns in a table called game named as
    R_Day - Type - Number
    R_Month - Type - Number
    R_Year - Type - Number
    R_Date - Type - Date
    I have around 1000 records and i want to fill R_Date column based on the data in the R_Day,R_Month,R_Year.
    How to write a query to fill the R_Date column based on other three columns.
    Thanks
    srinivas

    select
    to_date(R_Day||'-'||R_Month||'-'||R_Year,'DD-MM-YYYY')
    dt from (select 23 R_Day,07 R_Month,2007 R_Year from
    dual);
    Hi,
    Update <Table Name> set R_Date=select
    to_date(R_Day||'-'||R_Month||'-'||R_Year,'DD-MM-YYYY')
    from <Table Name>
    Regds.
    Nirmal
    SQL>  select * from test;
         R_DAY    R_MONTH     R_YEAR R_DATE
             1          1       2007
            21         11       2007
    SQL> update test
      2  set r_date = select to_date(R_Day||'-'||R_Month||'-'||R_Year,'DD-MM-YYYY')
      3  from test;
    set r_date = select to_date(R_Day||'-'||R_Month||'-'||R_Year,'DD-MM-YYYY')
    ERROR at line 2:
    ORA-00936: missing expression
    SQL> update test
      2  set r_date = to_date(r_day||'-'||r_month||'-'||r_year,'dd-mm-yyyy');
    2 rows updated.
    SQL> select * from test;
         R_DAY    R_MONTH     R_YEAR R_DATE
             1          1       2007 01-JAN-07
            21         11       2007 21-NOV-07
    NB:Please test before posting..                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

  • Automatically populate fields in jsp documents based on other fields

    hello guys. I have a jsp document
    that has the following
    <af:inputText value="#{bindings.SourceDocumentId.inputValue}"
    label="#{bindings.SourceDocumentId.label}"
    required="#{bindings.SourceDocumentId.mandatory}"
    columns="#{bindings.SourceDocumentId.displayWidth}"
    binding="#{backing_transactions_editTransactions.docId}"
    id="docId">
    <af:validator binding="#{bindings.SourceDocumentId.validator}"/>
    <f:convertNumber groupingUsed="false"
    pattern="#{bindings.SourceDocumentId.format}"/>
    </af:inputText>
    <af:inputText value="#{bindings.DocumentName.inputValue}"
    label="#{bindings.DocumentName.label}"
    required="#{bindings.DocumentName.mandatory}"
    columns="#{bindings.DocumentName.displayWidth}"
    binding="#{backing_transactions_editTransactions.docName}"
    id="docName">
    <af:validator binding="#{bindings.DocumentName.validator}"/>
    </af:inputText>
    And I have created the generated the backing beans automatically.
    public class EditTransactions {
    private CoreInputText docId;
    private CoreInputText docName;
    public CoreInputText getDocId() {
    return docId;
    public void setDocName(CoreInputText inputText7) {
    this.docName = inputText7;
    public CoreInputText getDocName() {
    return docName;
    I have a method in appmodule that has this
    public String getDocName(Number docId)
    {String docName;
    return docName
    on the document Id field I have to input a certain docId after I input the docId I have to populate automatically the docName based on the doc Id being given.
    question
    1. how can I set the document name automatically w/out submitting the page ?
    2. how can I use my backing bean to set the docName using the method in my AppModule.?
    Can anyone help me regarding this one.
    Thank in advance
    alvin.

A: automatically populate fields in jsp documents based on other fields

here is what you need to do:
1. Change the definitions for your fields as following
<af:inputText value="#{bindings.SourceDocumentId.inputValue}"
                        label="#{bindings.SourceDocumentId.label}"
                        required="#{bindings.SourceDocumentId.mandatory}"
                        columns="#{bindings.SourceDocumentId.displayWidth}"
                        binding="#{backing_transactions_editTransactions.docId}"
                        id="docId" valueChangeListener="#{backing_transactions_editTransactions.docIdChange}"
autoSubmit="true">
            <af:validator binding="#{bindings.SourceDocumentId.validator}"/>
            <f:convertNumber groupingUsed="false"
                             pattern="#{bindings.SourceDocumentId.format}"/>
          </af:inputText>
          <af:inputText value="#{bindings.DocumentName.inputValue}"
                        label="#{bindings.DocumentName.label}"
                        required="#{bindings.DocumentName.mandatory}"
                        columns="#{bindings.DocumentName.displayWidth}"
                        binding="#{backing_transactions_editTransactions.docName}"
                        id="docName"
partialTriggers="docId">
            <af:validator binding="#{bindings.DocumentName.validator}"/>
          </af:inputText>2. add the followig method to your backing bean:
  public void docIdChange(ValueChangeEvent valueChangeEvent) {
    getDocName().setValue((String)getDocId().getValue() + "suffix");
  }Run your form and enter the value into docId field, then press tab to go to the next field - docName will be populated

here is what you need to do:
1. Change the definitions for your fields as following
<af:inputText value="#{bindings.SourceDocumentId.inputValue}"
                        label="#{bindings.SourceDocumentId.label}"
                        required="#{bindings.SourceDocumentId.mandatory}"
                        columns="#{bindings.SourceDocumentId.displayWidth}"
                        binding="#{backing_transactions_editTransactions.docId}"
                        id="docId" valueChangeListener="#{backing_transactions_editTransactions.docIdChange}"
autoSubmit="true">
            <af:validator binding="#{bindings.SourceDocumentId.validator}"/>
            <f:convertNumber groupingUsed="false"
                             pattern="#{bindings.SourceDocumentId.format}"/>
          </af:inputText>
          <af:inputText value="#{bindings.DocumentName.inputValue}"
                        label="#{bindings.DocumentName.label}"
                        required="#{bindings.DocumentName.mandatory}"
                        columns="#{bindings.DocumentName.displayWidth}"
                        binding="#{backing_transactions_editTransactions.docName}"
                        id="docName"
partialTriggers="docId">
            <af:validator binding="#{bindings.DocumentName.validator}"/>
          </af:inputText>2. add the followig method to your backing bean:
  public void docIdChange(ValueChangeEvent valueChangeEvent) {
    getDocName().setValue((String)getDocId().getValue() + "suffix");
  }Run your form and enter the value into docId field, then press tab to go to the next field - docName will be populated

  • Pricing Condition type triggering based on other condition type

    Hello sir,
    There are some pricing condition types in our system.
    Based on condition records you can trigger one condition type based on other    condition type.
    For eg: PR00 condition type is there and amount is  suppose 1000rs and other condition type is JBED and we made a condition record and put it some percentage so as soon as we some value in PR00 ,JBED condition type is automatically manipulating the value on the base condition record.
    Now i want other than condition record can we trigger one condition type based on other condition type through defining user routine under requirement.
    Suppose we have condition type ABC and some amount i have given and other condition type DEF , i want that amount of DEF condition type should automatically come from the Condition type and it should manipulate according to my routine .
    eg  Condition type    Amount
           ABC                  1000
           DEF                    40
      The value 40 should come as 4% of 1000.
    I am not maintaing any condition record and i want that this should trigger through some requirement created by me.
    i created my routine no 905 and i putted the code inside it.
      if komtl-kschl = 'DEF'.
      komv-kbetr  =   ( komv-kbetr * 4) / 100.
    endif.
    Now problem is that this code is getting trigger when i m giving value in DEF condition type then it is showing 4 % of it.
    But i want as soon as i give value for the condition type ABC and some value 1000
    then after pressing enter , one condition type DEF should automatically come with value 40 that too in display mode ,not in change mode.
    Please suggestions and solutions regarding this matter , I will be grateful to you.
    Manish

    hi
    In V/06 in the calculation type you can see the entries for "D-gross weight" & "E-net weight"
    For the required condition type select the calculation type as gross weight or net weight. Save it.
    In MM01 - create material master, here in BASIC DATA 1 SCREEN you have fields for gross weight & net weight.
    Maintain the condition record in VK11 for the required condition type.
    You can also maintain the scales as required like u said
    1 to 10 kgs -  100 rupees,
    11 to 25 kgs - 1000 rupees.
    Another way could be
    The BEST practice to do it is, use of VOFM routine for price calculation (VOFM-->Formulae).
    Take help from ABAPer and write a routine such that
    if weight = 1 - 10
    price = 100.
    else if weight > 8.
    price = 1000.
    else
    price = 100.
    end if
    but the maintainnance of routine is big problem as u might be having many records
    Hope this will help you
    Vishal

  • Can you dynamically change an LOV on the parameter form based on other params?

    Can you dynamically change an LOV on the parameter form based on other parameters? For example, based on a entered purchase order number, create an LOV of the purchase order lines that belong to the entered PO #.

    Hi
    Accouding to my knoledge you can't do it.
    If you want to build lov for that particular
    value, you can do it in Forms.
    Vijay

  • Set Measure column "Aggregation Rule" to "sum" or other,return error

    when set a Measure column "Aggregation Rule" to "sum" or other,return error,as following:
    View Display Error
    Odbc driver returned an error (SQLExecDirectW).
    Error Details
    Error Codes: OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P
    State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 46008] Internal error: File server\Query\Optimizer\Request\Src\SQORRqList.cpp, line 285. (HY000)
    SQL Issued: SELECT s_0, s_1, s_2, s_3, s_4, s_5, s_6, s_7, s_8, s_9, s_10, s_11, s_12, s_13 FROM ( SELECT 0 s_0, "SPW_PRO"."Product"."FamilyGroupName" s_1, "SPW_PRO"."Product"."Gen4,Product" s_2, "SPW_PRO"."Product"."MajorGroupName" s_3, "SPW_PRO"."Product"."ProductName" s_4, SORTKEY("SPW_PRO"."Product"."Gen4,Product") s_5, "SPW_PRO"."SPWPRODB"."Sales" s_6, "SPW_PRO"."SPWPRODB"."Sales%" s_7, "SPW_PRO"."SPWPRODB"."产品运营天数" s_8, "SPW_PRO"."SPWPRODB"."售卖数量" s_9, REPORT_AGGREGATE("SPW_PRO"."SPWPRODB"."Sales" BY "SPW_PRO"."Product"."FamilyGroupName","SPW_PRO"."Product"."MajorGroupName") s_10, REPORT_AGGREGATE("SPW_PRO"."SPWPRODB"."Sales%" BY "SPW_PRO"."Product"."FamilyGroupName","SPW_PRO"."Product"."MajorGroupName") s_11, REPORT_AGGREGATE("SPW_PRO"."SPWPRODB"."产品运营天数" BY "SPW_PRO"."Product"."FamilyGroupName","SPW_PRO"."Product"."MajorGroupName") s_12, REPORT_MAX("SPW_PRO"."SPWPRODB"."售卖数量" BY "SPW_PRO"."Product"."FamilyGroupName","SPW_PRO"."Product"."MajorGroupName") s_13 FROM "SPW_PRO" WHERE (("Period"."Gen5,Period" IN (SELECT saw_1 FROM (SELECT "Period"."OperatingDaily" saw_0, "Period"."Gen5,Period" saw_1, "Year"."Gen2,Year" saw_2 FROM "SPW_PRO") nqw_1 )) AND ("Year"."Gen2,Year" IN (SELECT saw_2 FROM (SELECT "Period"."OperatingDaily" saw_0, "Period"."Gen5,Period" saw_1, "Year"."Gen2,Year" saw_2 FROM "SPW_PRO") nqw_1 ))) ) djm
    please help me . Thanks a lot.

    Thanks dnikiforov
    still get the
    select a.rmdept||a.rmstyl||a.rmcolr||a.rmsize||','||a.rmvatc||','||a.rmshgp||','||rmdesc||','||rmac
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-00904: invalid column name
    I think its a problem with trying to select on the unique, anyway I accidentally posted a couple of threads for this and it has now been resolved by
    select a.rmdept||a.rmstyl||a.rmcolr||a.rmsize||','||a.rmvatc||','||a.rmshgp||','||
    a.rmdesc||',||a.rmacod||','||a.rmcdes||','||a.rmzdes||','||a.rmsupp||','||a.rmsspr||','||a.rmlcos||','||
    c.rsbarc||','||a.rmpord||','||a.rmmrch||','||a.rmcomq||','||sum(b.rdcstk)
    from stkmas a, stkwar b, stkbar c
    where a.rmdept = c.rsdept(+)
    and a.rmstyl = c.rsstyl(+)
    and a.rmcolr = c.rscolr(+)
    and a.rmsize = c.rssize(+)
    and a.rmdept = b.rddept(+)
    and a.rmstyl = b.rdstyl(+)
    and a.rmcolr = b.rdcolr(+)
    and a.rmsize = b.rdsize(+)
    group by a.rmdept,a.rmstyl,a.rmcolr,a.rmsize,a.rmvatc,a.rmshgp,
    a.rmdesc,a.rmacod,a.rmcdes,a.rmzdes,a.rmsupp,a.rmsspr, a.rmlcos,
    c.rsbarc,a.rmpord,a.rmmrch,a.rmcomq
    as I dont need to use the unique because the sum does it for me
    Thanks again for speedy help

  • Filter looking for values based on other values

    Hi, is it possible to create a filter that returns items from the cache based on some criteria of other items in the cache.
    E.g. suppose I have a cache containing cars. I would like to create a filter that filters out all blue cars, but only if the cache also contains a red car.
    Best regards
    Jan

    Hi Jan,
    it is doable in a single pass in an aggregation, but it will not be too efficient for cases where no red cars exist.
    The problem is that in case of a partitioned cache, it is possible that there is a single red car in the cache on a separate node from the blue cars. In this case the blue cars should be returned. However it is also possible that there is no red car in the cache.
    In this example the nodes with the blue cars from the previous example won't be able to distinguish the two cases from one another based on only their own data. Therefore they have to return the blue cars, and let the client throw away all data based on whether the existence of a red car was indicated.
    If red cars are an unlikely event, it is better to first query (or aggregate for minimum traffic) for the existence of the red car, and only if it exists, then query for blue cars.
    If red cars are a probable event and having as few roundtrips to the cache as possible is more important then efficiency, then it is probably better to just (in parallel) aggregate the blue cars and indicate whether a red car exists on that node or not.
    For aggregations and particularly for parallel-aware aggregations, you can look at the following page:
    http://wiki.tangosol.com/display/COH34UG/Provide+a+Data+Grid#ProvideaDataGrid-DataGridAggregation
    Best regards,
    Robert

  • How do you display an item value based on other items?

    Item C's value depends on item A and B. If both A&B are null then C should display null , if A is null but B is not null then display 'Ok', everthing else display ' problem';
    3 items on page 5
    item A: name p5_A, display as text (saves state). source type is a dabase column
    item B: name P5_B, display as text (saves state). source type is a databbase column
    item C: name P5_C, display as text (based on PLsql doest not save state), source type pl/sql anonymous block ? like the following
    if :P5_A is null and :P5_B is null then :P5_C is null; else if :P5_A is null and :P5_B is not null then :P5_C := 'OK'; else :P5_C := 'Problem'; end if;
    Can someone tell me what did I do wrong on these stements unde apex? Thanks a bunch.
    Tai

    Alternatively, you could do a add a computation for that item - same source as mentioned in the previous reply, but each will work.
    Also, in your anonymous block, you have:
    if :P5_A is null and :P5_B is null then :P5_C is null; else if :P5_A is null and :P5_B is not null then :P5_C := 'OK'; else :P5_C := 'Problem'; end if;should probably be
    if :P5_A is null and :P5_B is null then :P5_C := null; elsif :P5_A is null and :P5_B is not null then :P5_C := 'OK'; else :P5_C := 'Problem'; end if;so instead of :P5_C is null , assign it a null - :P5_C := null. Also, else if in pl/sql is written as: elsif
    Edited by: tr3nton on Jan 19, 2010 3:03 PM

  • Trying to show/hide a region based on other DB content

    I am trying to get a date to show or hide based on the content of another date within the same record, but I don't know how to write the code for the bold compare bit of the show if, the bit after the !==
    Here's the code I have:
            <?php if ($row_rs_events['fld_eventsEND']!=="$row_rs_events['fld_eventsSTART']"){ ?>
    It's two dates for an events calendar list that I am building, and basically it works like this... IF I have a start date and an end date which are different (a multiple day event), then I want both dates to display, but if the start and end date are the same (a single day event), then I only want to show the start date.
    Multiple days event:
    From December 10, 2012 to December 15, 2012.
    Single day event:
    On December 10, 2012
    Can you please advise?
    Thanks.

    looks correct to me, except for the extra double-quotes:
    <?php if ($row_rs_events['fld_eventsEND']!==$row_rs_events['fld_eventsSTART']){ ?>

  • How to Create a Cube Based on other Cubes?

    I want to create a cube that is sourced from other cubes. My situation is I have a number of cubes based on individual products and I want to create a cross-product cube that combines the individual product cubes at a common dimensional grain.
    e.g :
    CUBE_1 (DIM_1, DIM_2, DIM_3)
    CUBE_2 (DIM_1, DIM_2, DIM_3, DIM_4)
    CUBE_3 (DIM_1, DIM_2, DIM_3, DIM_4, DIM_5)
    CROSS_CUBE (DIM_1, DIM_2, DIM_3)
    I see if your cubes are in the same AW then you can access measures from other cubes with a calculated measure. But I'm struggling to understand two things:
    1. If I want to build a cube that is only sourced from other cubes and not any database tables then what do I put in the cube mapping?
    2. If I create a calculated measure that accesses another cube's measure does Oracle OLAP automatically match up the dimensionality? e.g. If I create a calculated measure in CROSS_CUBE that adds together a measure from CUBE_1 and a measure from CUBE_2 then will the new measure return the correct results across  DIM_1, DIM_2 and DIM_3?
    To do this in a relational star schema you have to do a Drill-Across: http://www.kimballgroup.com/2005/06/design-tip-68-simple-drill-across-in-sql/
    Is what I'm trying to do possible or will I need to combine the cube views into another view and use this as my cross cube source?
    Thanks in advance.
    OLAP Analytic Workspace 11.2.0.4.0
    Oracle OLAP API 11.2.0.4.0
    OLAP Catalog 11.2.0.4.0

    You can create a cube in AWM which consists only of calculated measures.  These calculated measures can reference other cubes provided that
    1) the cubes are in the same Analytic workspace as the calculated measure cube and
    2) the calculated measure cube is dimensioned by the same dimensions as all the cube measures it references in its calculated measures.
    For instance, if your calculated cube is dimensioned by dim1, dim2, dim3 and dim4, it can have calculated measures which refer to measures in cubes that are dimensioned by any subset of the dimensions (i.e. dim1 and dim3, or dim1, dim2, dim3 and dim4, etc).
    The calculated measure cube does not need to be mapped because it only contains calculated measures that reference measures in other cubes which I am assuming are mapped and built. 
    --Ken

  • How to display F4 values in one field based on other field selection

    Hi All,
    How to hide a UI element (i.e Link to action) highlited for Normal User and display the same to super user.
    Component Name : /SAPSRM/WDC_DODC_SC_GAF_C
    2.Can i know how to display  the entries in supplier field based on Product category selection.
    Right now all the entries are getting displayed in the supplier field.
    I want to display only entries based on Product category.
    Search Help Name : BBP_BUPA_CLL_PARTNER
    Component Name : /SAPSRM/WDC_DODC_SC_I_LIM
    How to enhance the web dynpro component with the filtered values.
    Regards,
    Krish.

    Hi Ashvin,
                 Thanks for the document. In the search help there is a standard FM which is getting executed.
    Can i enhance that FM or should i copy and edit.
    BBP_F4IF_SHLP_EXIT_CLL_PARTNER
    If i creata a Z FM and make changes how to pass that values to my standard Component View UI Element.
    If not then suggest me some alternative.
    Regards,
    Krish

    • Maybe you are looking for