AUTOINVOICE GROUPING RULE

제품: Applications
작성날짜 : 2006-05-30
AUTOINVOICE GROUPING RULE
=========================
PURPOSE
Autoinvoice를 할때는 반드시 사용하는 필수 grouping조건이 있습니다.
아래의 Grouping조건에 만족하면 동일 거래로 만들어 지게 됩니다.
Explanation
Ordering and Grouping Rule list
Mandatory Grouping Characteristics
Agreement
Batch Name
Bill To Address
Bill To Contact
Bill To Customer
Comments
Commitment Document's Id
Contract ID
Conversion Date
Conversion Rate
Conversion Rate Type
Credit Method for Accounting Rule
Credit Method for Installments
Credited Document's Id
Currency
Customer Bank Account
Document Number
Document Number Sequence Id
GL Date
Imported Billing Number
Internal Notes
Invoice Date
Invoice Level Descriptive Attribute 1
Invoice Level Descriptive Attribute 10
Invoice Level Descriptive Attribute 11
Invoice Level Descriptive Attribute 12
Invoice Level Descriptive Attribute 13
Invoice Level Descriptive Attribute 14
Invoice Level Descriptive Attribute 15
Invoice Level Descriptive Attribute 2
Invoice Level Descriptive Attribute 3
Invoice Level Descriptive Attribute 4
Invoice Level Descriptive Attribute 5
Invoice Level Descriptive Attribute 6
Invoice Level Descriptive Attribute 7
Invoice Level Descriptive Attribute 8
Invoice Level Descriptive Attribute 9
Invoice Level Descriptive Category
Invoice Level Global Attribute 1
Invoice Level Global Attribute 10
Invoice Level Global Attribute 11
Invoice Level Global Attribute 12
Invoice Level Global Attribute 13
Invoice Level Global Attribute 14
Invoice Level Global Attribute 15
Invoice Level Global Attribute 16
Invoice Level Global Attribute 17
Invoice Level Global Attribute 18
Invoice Level Global Attribute 19
Invoice Level Global Attribute 2
Invoice Level Global Attribute 20
Invoice Level Global Attribute 21
Invoice Level Global Attribute 22
Invoice Level Global Attribute 23
Invoice Level Global Attribute 24
Invoice Level Global Attribute 25
Invoice Level Global Attribute 26
Invoice Level Global Attribute 27
Invoice Level Global Attribute 28
Invoice Level Global Attribute 29
Invoice Level Global Attribute 3
Invoice Level Global Attribute 30
Invoice Level Global Attribute 4
Invoice Level Global Attribute 5
Invoice Level Global Attribute 6
Invoice Level Global Attribute 7
Invoice Level Global Attribute 8
Invoice Level Global Attribute 9
Invoice Level Global Attribute Category
Invoicing Rule
Memo Reason
Payment Set Id
Payment Terms
Primary Salesperson
Printing Option
Purchase Order
Purchase Order Date
Purchase Order Revision
Receipt Method
Related Document
Sales Territory
Set of Books Id
Ship To Address
Ship To Contact
Ship To Customer
Sold To Customer
Transaction Number
Transaction Type
Example
Reference Documents
5459900.992

Similar Messages

Autoinvoice Group Rules - Grouping of multiple Sales Orders

I have this requirement to group invoices by subinventory, ship-to address and PO number, all these coming from the Order Entry form. What it means is that multiple Sales Orders having the same subinventory, ship-to address and PO number and also with Receivable Interface, Interfaced, should be grouped into a single invoice. Could you please advise what are the steps needed to do this. From the list of values for the Optional Grouping Characteristics in the Autoinvoice Group Rules form, I do not see the values like subinventory, ship-to address or PO number. Do I have to associate them (subinventory, ship-to address and PO number) with some of those in the list of values (eg, Line Level Descriptive Attribute1, Line Level Global Attribute1 or Transaction Flexfield Attribute1). Is there any order or procedure to associate them and where and how do I associate them? Your detailed advice to this is much appreciated. Thank you very much. God bless you

Bill
Yes you do have to associate functional entities like suninventory with the appropriate columns in the interface table.
For a comprehensive list of columns and the data they contain, refer the Open Interfaces manual for OE - you can find a section where it describes column by column what info gets transferred to AR. I am sorry I don't remember the exact section names..i don't have access to a manual right now..later maybe!!

R11i - AR Autoinvoice - Mandatory grouping rules (N deliveries = 1 invoice)

Hi.
We have one big client who has a lot of shipment addresses (for deliveries) and when all orders are invoiced we want to get only one invoice for all different deliveries (we cant just merge all orders in to one ship_to_address site).
The usual way for changing the way of grouping with autoinvoice is using different grouping rules (but only adding not removing):
Can the Mandatory grouping rules attributes be changed? (we would like to remove the ship_to_address attribute). Any other way to create only one invoice?
Oracle® Receivables - User Guide:
Grouping rules include mandatory attributes which are always included in all grouping
rules, and optional attributes which may be included in a grouping rule. Optional
attributes may be added to the mandatory attributes to create new grouping rules
Thanks for any help.
Kind regards,
Kristjan
Edited by: user10676522 on 28.4.2010 23:44

Hi Kristjan,
No, you cannot change the mandatory grouping rules. As you know the ship_to_customer is one of the mandatory grouping columns, so if you want shipments to multiple ship_to locations to be all in one invoice, there is no other way but to remove the ship_to references from the ra_interface_lines_all table before you run autoinvoice. This obviously means that you lose the ship_to references on your invoice. To take care of that, you can pass on the ship_to information on the transaction line flexfield.
Hope this hepls.
Thanks,
Anil

Automatic clearing - Grouping rules

Hi All,
I try to configure the automatic clearing process but unfortunatelly the grouping variants don't work:
First rule: group by DFKKOP-XBLNR and DFKKOP-ZZ_RST3
Second rule: group by DFKKOP-XBLNR
Posting 1: xblnr = A / zz_rst3 = B / 10 EUR
Posting 2: xblnr = A / zz_rst3 = B /-10 EUR
Posting 3: xblnr = A / zz_rst3 = C / 30 EUR
Posting 4: xblnr = A / zz_rst3 = D /-30 EUR
I would like to clear:
1.- Posting 1 and 2 together
2.- Posting 3 and 4 together
Is it possible to do it without programming? I have changed in customizing grouping rules (blanc, 1, 2, 3), but it doesn't work. My results changing the grouping rules are: I clear all the postings together or I only clear the posting 1 and 2.
Your response is greatly appreciated.
Cheers,
maresp

Hi,
thank you for your answer!
Grouping rule 5? I have in customizing only 4 options for the automatic clearing (blanc, 1, 2, 3, 4)
Cheers
maresp
Edited by: maresp on Oct 5, 2010 10:22 AM

PO Splitting Rules/ Requisition line grouping Rules for Autocreate

Hello,
I need to know what are the rules that cause requisition to split into multiple PO's when auto generated?
I know two profile values 'PO: Use Need-by Date for Default Autocreate grouping' or 'PO: Use Ship-to Organization and Location for Default Autocreate grouping' that we can setup. Are there any such profile options available? Or can we change to add or remove the requisition line grouping rules? If yes, how to achieve that?
Our business is inquiring if it is possible to suppress grouping based on Buyer? We have case where single requisition had multiple lines. This requisition generated 3 unique PO's based on buyer.
Any impits will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Anish

Hello Sandeep,
Thank you for your response.
Our buyer do not go to autocreate screen. When purchasing requisition is approved, it automatically generates PO.
Our business wants to remove requistion grouping based on BUyer. Eg: Currently if requisition has 3 lines with 3 different category items and each category has different Buyer assigned to it, then autocreate process will generate 3 unique PO's for this one requisition.
Thanks,
Anish

Field status group rules in FI

Hi experts,
I have some FI data in a Excel sheet.
In that Excel sheet i have header data.Some hearder data is in one color and some header data is in another color.
So while posting this data into SAP i have to apply field status group rules( for required and suppress fields)..Can any body have any example code for this ?
Regards

Hi,
use fm FI_FIELD_SELECTION_DETERMINE
Re: Access to GL Field Status Group Settings
A.

Difference between Source & DESTINATION GROUP RULE in Cisco CSS

Hello All,
I am newbie for CSS. I know how flow works for normal CSS request without group rule. But whenever it comes to group rule I am pretty much
confuse about following:
- When we use source group rule & when we use destination group rule ?
- What is difference between them ?
- How the flow of data works in both of them?
Any help or explanation would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Me too

the group rule determines in which direction you will do nat . consider
group USHA
vip address 10.86.178.244
add service Ushatest
active
add service says that if the server we defined with service Ushatest initiates a connection outbound through the CSS we will source nat the server address to 10.86.178.244
now consider
group DOT005
add destination service dot008
add destination service dot014
vip address 10.86.178.5
we are saying that when a client hits a content rule to get loadbalanced to one of the services we will nat the client address to 10.86.178.5
in both cases nat is overloaded (pat) so many connections can be natted to the same address.
In the case where you have a content rule that loadbalances to a server and that server does not use the CSS as its default gateway w would use add destination service to get the return traffic back to the CSS.
In the case where a server is initiating the connection and we want to hide the server address we would use add service.

What infotypes are proccessed if grouping rule XALL is used?

Hello experts,
We are implementing cuncurrent employment at one of our clients, We want to use Personnel assignment grouping rule XALL which defines that all personnel assignments of a concurrently employed person are always processed together.
However we donot want all the infotypes to be proccessed together and are not sure which are the infotypes get processed together if we use XALL.
Please let me know the list of infotypes that get processed together if we use XALL.
Appreciate your help,
Revanth.

Hello experts,
We are implementing cuncurrent employment at one of our clients, We want to use Personnel assignment grouping rule XALL which defines that all personnel assignments of a concurrently employed person are always processed together.
However we donot want all the infotypes to be proccessed together and are not sure which are the infotypes get processed together if we use XALL.
Please let me know the list of infotypes that get processed together if we use XALL.
Appreciate your help,
Revanth.

Prime Infrastructure 2.0 Importing user-defined group rules

Dears,
I'm looking for a way to import rules to put devices in a user defined group.
I can see how I can create groups and rules manually, but not how I could export or import those rules.
Is this possible, or on the roadmap?
Cheers,
Michel

In the Cisco Prime Infrastructure 2.0 Deployment Guide under LMS 4.2 Data Migration there is a way to import settings from a "special" backup made from LMS.
This should allow for importing userdefined groups.
Does anyone have tried this yet?
Cheers,
Michel

Grouping Rules in PL/SQL Help needed

Hi I have a requirement where I wan to group based on the below scenario
I have a Table_A
Table_A strcuture:
create table table_a
code number,
name varchar2 (100),
city varchar2 (100),
dept varchar2 (100));;
insert into table_a
values
1,'ABC','EA','A');
insert into table_a
values
1,'ABC','EA1','A');
insert into table_a
values
2,'BCD','EA2','A');
insert into table_a
values
2,'ABC','EA3','A'');
insert into table_a
values
3,'KBC','EA,'A');
insert into table_a
values
3,'ABC','EA,'A');
wan to group the above table data based on name,city,dept
I wan the data as
1           ABC             EA1    A
             BCD            EA2     A
2           BCD            EA2     A
             ABC            EA3     A
3           KBC            EA      A
             BCD            EA      A
Kindly any help will be needful for me

This is more of a presentation layer problem I would not handle it in SQL. For example if the presentation layer is SQL Plus you can use BREAK command, like this.
SQL> select * from table_a;
      CODE NAME       CITY       DEPT
         1 ABC        EA         A
         1 ABC        EA1        A
         2 BCD        EA2        A
         2 ABC        EA3        A
         3 KBC        EA         A
         3 ABC        EA         A
6 rows selected.
SQL> break on code
SQL>
SQL> select * from table_a order by code;
      CODE NAME       CITY       DEPT
         1 ABC        EA         A
           ABC        EA1        A
         2 BCD        EA2        A
           ABC        EA3        A
         3 KBC        EA         A
           ABC        EA         A
6 rows selected.
But if you still wish to do it in SQL the right way is to use ROW_NUMBER like this.
SQL> clear breaks
breaks cleared
SQL>
SQL> select * from table_a;
      CODE NAME       CITY       DEPT
         1 ABC        EA         A
         1 ABC        EA1        A
         2 BCD        EA2        A
         2 ABC        EA3        A
         3 KBC        EA         A
         3 ABC        EA         A
6 rows selected.
SQL> select decode(rno, 1, code) code
2       , name
3       , city
4       , dept
5    from (
6           select row_number() over(partition by code order by name) rno
7                , t.*
8             from table_a t
9         )
10 /
      CODE NAME       CITY       DEPT
         1 ABC        EA         A
           ABC        EA1        A
         2 ABC        EA3        A
           BCD        EA2        A
         3 ABC        EA         A
           KBC        EA         A
6 rows selected.

IDOC: INVOIC - for more than one purchase order

Hello Experts,
I have an IDOC INVOIC for incomming invoices.
The problem is, that in case of more purchase orders (GR was posted with the same delivery number!) the IDOC can not be posted, because it just finds the first PO (invoiced quantity higher than GR quantiy).
How can i reach, that the IDOC finds all PO with the same delivery number (from GR) und splits up the the relevant purchase orders!
In Segment E1EDP02
i have qualifier 016
and BELNR = is the delivery numner by GR (the delivery numner is the same for all POs).
Many thanks in davance,
Hannes

Hi Prashant
1-I accessed form Setup > Transactions > AutoInvoice > Grouping Rule and removed (Group by) Data at the table
2-at system opiton i made this rule used
3-i Created 2 sales orders and shipped it
4-Post to the Receivables
it generates 2 invoices for every sales order not one invoice for the two sales order
what's my error
Regards
Amr Hussien

Error while creating a Rule Group

Hi All,
We are upgrading from 11.5.8 to 11.5.10.
We had some customizations in 11.5.8 which we have to do in 11.5.10 as well.
In 11.5.8, we had a custom form, which was used to add lines to already existing contracts.
We were using Okc_Rule_Pub.create_rule_group to create rule group..
We are facing a problem in 11.5.10 when using the same code to add lines in contracts of category "Service Agreement".
The api Okc_Rule_Pub.create_rule_group is erroring out with message
"Rule Groups/Rules are not allowed for this contract category."
Any help in this regard is highly appreciated.
Regards,
Anas.

Hi Anas,
I have a similar problem with a package in which we create new contracts. It's working fine in 11.5.9, but after upgrading to 11.5.10 it does not;
My error is : Rule &VALUE is not allowed for this contract category.
Could be the same problem as yours..
How did you solve it ??
Thanks in advance for your answer.
Regards, Bert

Error while creating rule policies in rule builder

hi all ,
We are using CRM 7.0 , we are configuring territory management using building block ( C06 ).
In territory management while configuring territory atributes through WEB UI , I am facing a problem in step no. 4.5.3 of building block (C 06) which states:-
4.5.3     Define Rule Policy and Rule Set
Use
Rule Sets logically group rules and define their parameters.
Procedure
1.     Access the activity using the following navigation options:
CRM Web UI          Logon using the role Sales Manager
Navigation          Sales Operations- Search - Rule Policies for Rule Builder
2.     Click New and select TM- Territory Management as Rule Policy Type. Enter the description BP Territory Management for your Rule Policy
+After this step I am not able to edit or create a node for it...which is said to be done in next step..+
3.     Select the newly create policy and click on new Node to enter a new rule set. In the pop-up window, select the option Rule Set to create a new rule set from scratch. You can also select the option Rule Set with Template if you would like to create a new rule set based on a previously created set. Enter a description.
Field name     User action and values
Description     Postal Code Assignment
4.     Choose Save.
thanks
SHIKHAR ARORA

Hi,
we are facing the same error. (CRM 7.0 SP05)
Did anybody fix this problem right now.
Thanks
Christian

Clearing Variant Grouping by 30 days

Hi All,
could any one help me out in clearing variant configuration, I want to select open items which are greater than 30 days old with Main Transaction and Sub Transaction.
can we use special characters in grouping rule like > 30?
Thanks in Advance
...KK

Kk:
You will need to create a custom grouping criteria and use logic found in sample FM ISU_SAMPLE_TFK116.
regards,
bill.

Pick Slip Grouping

Oracle Gurus,
I have defined pick grouping rule by itemwise, as per this parameter when I release sales orders.. should be picked up by itemwise.
Example:
Order Number     Item     Qty
100001     A     200
100001     B     111
100002     A     300
100002     B     222
100003     A     400
100003     B     333
I want to release all above order at same time, as per pickslip grouping rule only by Item.... System should pick as Item A as : Qty 900 and Item B as Qty 666.
System is creating pick slip as by orderwise and itemwise, totally 6 lines created...
My client dont want to go each and every time pick the same item, its waste of time.
If they get pickslip as Group as Qty 900 - Item A and Qty 666 - Item B - Picker goto respective subinventory pick the items.
How to do this setup to achieve my requirement.
Quick responses highly appreciated.

Hi, I am trying to sort Pick slip grouping by Items however it is grayed out. Any idea, How can I make it enable?

AUTOINVOICE GROUPING RULE

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for