Automatic Content Distribution issues

Hi I am trying to test On Demand Content distribution in my environment and its not working. Feel like I am missing something obvious. Also I read over this article:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/neilp/archive/2013/01/03/on-demand-content-distribution-fallback-distribution-points-a-2012-configuration-manager-micro-depp-dive.aspx
My 2012 test environment:
1 Primary site with co-located DP (Subnet in BoundaryGroup1)
S01 (Secondary site 1) with co-located DP (BoundaryGroup2)
S02 (Secondary site 2) with co-located DP (BoundaryGroup3)
Only one subnet and one DP is assigned/member in each Boundary Group.
All my packages are set to ‘Distribute the content for this package to preferred distribution points’ and fallback is NOT enabled on the deployments
TestPackage1 is currently deployed to Primary site and S02 DPs. I have a client being managed by S01 and want to download TestPackage1. In the cas.log and execmgr.log it states No DP found with the package and deployment fails. The deployment is set for "Available".
When I look at the distmgr.log on both Primary and S01 I dont see a DMB file created and package is never deployed to the S01 DP.
Thanks for the help.

Can you please zip mp_location.log and distmgr.log on site S01 to SkyDrive? I need to take a look at there logs.
Suspected causes:
1. The instruction file has not been dropped by MP.
2. The instruction file has replication error.
Juke Chou
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

Content distribution issue with message "Found package properties updated notification for package '00000123'"

I've got strange issue with 1 of my primary sites that started just recently. I've updated the content of 1 package and this now needs re-distribution to all DPs. I've got 3 primary sites and on 2 of those the update succeeded and my DP's got
updated correctly. One primary site it does not work and checking distrmgr.log I can see following message every xx minutes
Found package properties updated notification for package '000008B7' SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 6/21/2014 12:00:31 AM 5836 (0x16CC) ==>
Checking Pkgxfermgr.log does not show anything either, I've tried with 2nd application but again the same result it only shows the the notification message.
I saw similar issue yesterday but with restart of the sms_exec service it eventually distributed the content, obviously this is not something I like to do too often.
does anyone have idea what this could be, suggestions are welcome. Thx.

Jason, I've checked the flow from the CAS down to the primary below is quick overview. The package I'm testing is just small package that we use to check replication is working in our environment it's less then 1MB in size and we run it
1/week basically update content and then check monitoring-content distribution that it has been received on our 260 DP's around the globe
CAS (Located in the US EST Time zone)
Distrmgr.log 11:25am update package and needs to be send to 3x primary sites (A00; B00; C00)
sender.log 11:30am all 3 primary sites have received the content.
C00 (Primary site in Singapore having the issue)
distrmgr.log 11:27pm received notification of the package
despool.log 11:32pm packaged content extracted successfully
distrmg.log started to see message Found notification for package '000008B7' and followed by next message
Package '000008B7' (priority 2) is already in queue.
This goes one until 1:21am (Singapore time)
Start updating the package 000008B7... SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 6/21/2014 1:21:45 AM 8296 (0x2068)
The Package Action is 1, the Update Mask is 160 and UpdateMaskEx is 0. SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 6/21/2014 1:21:45 AM 8296 (0x2068)
Use drive G for storing the compressed package. SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 6/21/2014 1:21:45 AM 8296 (0x2068)
Successfully created/updated the package 000008B7 SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 6/21/2014 1:21:45 AM 8296 (0x2068)
STATMSG: ID=2311 SEV=I LEV=M SOURCE="SMS Server" COMP="SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER" SYS=SG-INTRA100.na.pg.com SITE=C00 PID=10132 TID=8296 GMTDATE=Fri Jun 20 17:21:45.848 2014 ISTR0="000008B7" ISTR1="" ISTR2="" ISTR3="" ISTR4="" ISTR5="" ISTR6="" ISTR7=""
ISTR8="" ISTR9="" NUMATTRS=1 AID0=400 AVAL0="000008B7"
After that nothing anymore.
When I check monitoring - content distribution I can see the package being updated/distributed to 80% of my DP's and last 20% are the dp connected below this Primary site.
To add to the confusion, there was another package distributed around the same time, and then one actually made it to the remote DP's.
This is first time I see this issue.

Automatic Mailbox Distribution problem after Creating New AD Site

We redesigned our Active Directory Sites a little while ago. We moved the subnets and servers from the old sites to the new sites. We haven't removed the old sites yet, but that will happen soon. We haven't noticed any issues with the new
sites except for one weird issue and that is that Automatic Mailbox Distribution no longer works, in fact if you don't specify a database with the enable-mailbox (or new-mailbox) commands it will fail with an error that load balancing failed to find a valid
mailbox.
The problem, from the output of an enable-mailbox, command appears to be a site problem (from the fact that the automatic mailbox distribution discards sites that are not in the same site as the user). The verbose output has the command checking the
old site even though the server is in the new site. I've already checked the databases and none of them have the IsExcludedFromProvisioning or IsSuspendedFromProvisioning properties set to TRUE
My question is how do I make the databases show up as in the new site rather than the old site?
Any and all help with this issue is appreciated.
This is the output from the command:
VERBOSE: [16:36:50.864 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Initializing Active Directory server settings for the remote Windows
PowerShell session.
VERBOSE: [16:36:50.864 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Active Directory session settings for 'Enable-Mailbox' are: View Entire
Forest: 'False', Default Scope: 'domain.local', Configuration Domain Controller: 'DC01.domain.local', Preferred Global
Catalog: 'VMDC01.domain.local', Preferred Domain Controllers: '{ VMDC01.domain.local }'
VERBOSE: [16:36:50.864 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Runspace context: Executing user: domain.local/All Users/AD/Admin1,
Executing user organization: , Current organization: , RBAC-enabled: Enabled.
VERBOSE: [16:36:50.864 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Beginning processing &
VERBOSE: [16:36:50.880 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Instantiating handler with index 0 for cmdlet extension agent "Query Base
DN Agent".
VERBOSE: [16:36:50.880 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Instantiating handler with index 1 for cmdlet extension agent "Rus Agent".
VERBOSE: [16:36:50.880 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Instantiating handler with index 2 for cmdlet extension agent "Mailbox
Resources Management Agent".
VERBOSE: [16:36:50.880 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Instantiating handler with index 3 for cmdlet extension agent "Mailbox
Creation Time Agent".
VERBOSE: [16:36:50.880 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Instantiating handler with index 4 for cmdlet extension agent
"Provisioning Policy Agent".
VERBOSE: [16:36:50.880 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Instantiating handler with index 5 for cmdlet extension agent "Admin Audit
Log Agent".
VERBOSE: [16:36:50.927 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Current ScopeSet is: { Recipient Read Scope: {{, }}, Recipient Write
Scopes: {{, }}, Configuration Read Scope: {{, }}, Configuration Write Scope(s): {{, }, }, Exclusive Recipient Scope(s):
{}, Exclusive Configuration Scope(s): {} }
VERBOSE: [16:36:50.927 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Searching objects "domain.local/All Users/SM/GP/User1" of type
"ADUser" under the root "$null".
VERBOSE: [16:36:50.942 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Previous operation run on domain controller 'VMDC01.domain.local'.
VERBOSE: [16:36:50.974 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Load Balance : Database container located at 'CN=Databases,CN=Exchange
Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT),CN=Administrative Groups,CN=DOMAIN,CN=Microsoft
Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,DC=DOMAIN,DC=local'.
VERBOSE: [16:36:50.974 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Searching objects of type "MailboxDatabase" with filter
"(&((IsExcludedFromProvisioning Equal False)(IsSuspendedFromProvisioning Equal False)(Recovery Equal False)))", scope
"OneLevel" under the root "Databases".
VERBOSE: [16:36:51.005 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Comparing local site 'OLD-SITENAME' with database site 'OLD-SITENAME'.
VERBOSE: [16:36:51.021 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Comparing local site 'OLD-SITENAME' with database site 'OLD-SITENAME'.
VERBOSE: [16:36:51.021 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Comparing local site 'OLD-SITENAME' with database site 'OLD-SITENAME'.
VERBOSE: [16:36:51.021 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Comparing local site 'OLD-SITENAME' with database site 'OLD-SITENAME'.
VERBOSE: [16:36:51.021 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Comparing local site 'OLD-SITENAME' with database site 'OLD-SITENAME'.
VERBOSE: [16:36:51.021 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Comparing local site 'OLD-SITENAME' with database site 'OLD-SITENAME'.
VERBOSE: [16:36:51.036 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Comparing local site 'OLD-SITENAME' with database site 'OLD-SITENAME'.
VERBOSE: [16:36:51.036 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Comparing local site 'OLD-SITENAME' with database site 'OLD-SITENAME'.
VERBOSE: [16:36:51.036 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Comparing local site 'OLD-SITENAME' with database site 'OLD-SITENAME'.
VERBOSE: [16:36:51.036 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Comparing local site 'OLD-SITENAME' with database site 'OLD-SITENAME'.
VERBOSE: [16:36:51.036 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Comparing local site 'OLD-SITENAME' with database site 'OLD-SITENAME'.
VERBOSE: [16:36:51.036 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Comparing local site 'OLD-SITENAME' with database site 'OLD-SITENAME'.
VERBOSE: [16:36:51.052 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Comparing local site 'OLD-SITENAME' with database site 'OLD-SITENAME'.
VERBOSE: [16:36:51.052 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Comparing local site 'OLD-SITENAME' with database site 'OLD-SITENAME'.
VERBOSE: [16:36:51.052 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Comparing local site 'OLD-SITENAME' with database site 'OLD-SITENAME'.
VERBOSE: [16:36:51.052 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Comparing local site 'OLD-SITENAME' with database site 'OLD-SITENAME'.
VERBOSE: [16:36:51.067 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Comparing local site 'OLD-SITENAME' with database site 'OLD-SITENAME'.
VERBOSE: [16:36:51.067 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Comparing local site 'OLD-SITENAME' with database site 'OLD-SITENAME'.
VERBOSE: [16:36:51.067 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Comparing local site 'OLD-SITENAME' with database site 'OLD-SITENAME'.
VERBOSE: [16:36:51.067 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Comparing local site 'OLD-SITENAME' with database site 'OLD-SITENAME'.
VERBOSE: [16:36:51.067 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Load Balance : The search for databases returned an empty result. This
could happen if all databases are excluded from the Load Balance process.
VERBOSE: [16:36:51.067 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Load Balance : There is no available database. Refer to previous verbose
messages for more information.
VERBOSE: [16:36:51.067 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Admin Audit Log: Entered Handler:OnComplete.
Load balancing failed to find a valid mailbox database.
+ CategoryInfo : NotSpecified: (0:Int32) [Enable-Mailbox], RecipientTaskException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : 4AE0EA04,Microsoft.Exchange.Management.RecipientTasks.EnableMailbox
VERBOSE: [16:36:51.083 GMT] Enable-Mailbox : Ending processing &

Hi,
From your description, I would like to clarify the following thing:
By default, all online and healthy mailbox databases on Exchange 2010 servers in the local Active Directory site can be chosen by automatic mailbox distribution to store a new or moved mailbox. Mailbox databases in other AD site can't be chosen by automatic
mailbox distribution to store a new or moved mailbox.
What's more, I recommend you use the following cmdlet to enable mailbox and check the result.
Enable-Mailbox -Identity xxx -Database xxx
Hope it helps.
Best regards,
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support

Part 2: Flat files and Business Contents: Any issues with this scenario?

I will appreciate some clarification on the some points made in response to my previous post "Flat files and Business Contents: Any issues with this scenario?"
1.
" ...youd better analyze those cubes for data redundancy and presence of data youll never use. " I will appreciate some clarification on the type of analysis you are referring to. Examples will help.
2.
"If you want to combine several found IOs in your custom dataprovider, then again you must know (or figure out) relationships between these IOs." I will appreciate some clarification on the type of relationship you are referring to. Examples will help.
3.
I am a bit confused with "..include into ODS structure ALL fields required for the cube" but you also noted noted that "...except navigational attributes and chars and KFs that are going to be determined in TRs or URs."
If you exclude ALL these, haven't you excluded all the fields you included in the ODS structure?
4.
"Consider carefully the ODS key fields selection. Their combination should not allow data aggregation that you dont need."
I may be missing the point here, I understand that you need to select the fields which will form the unique ID for the records in the ODS under the Key Field (please correct me if I am wrong with the purpose of the Key Field), but I don't understand the discussion of "aggregation" in the context.
Thanks in advance

Hallo
I try to give some exaplanation based on the previous answer.
1. Data redundancy - make sure you do not store the same information. does not make sense to have data redundanty across you Data Warehouse. this is also a cost. just sotre the same information one time if you get all what you need.
2. whatwhever you build you dp, which consist of IO, you need to know with kind of relation (1:1 or 1:n - n:n and so on) exist between them. that will help you when you model you infoprovider. For example I would never pit togheter IO (n:m) in the same dimension if you expect an high number of cardinality. Sometime an IO can be an attribute of another one (depend on relation. For example
Business Partner and his Address. Usually you have a relation 1:1, in this case address is an attribute of BParten and store it in the Masterdata instead then DP
3. Sometime when you load from ODS to CUBE, you can fill some IO (which are in the infocube and not in the ODS)through ABAP routine in TR-Start Routine of Update Rule. Does not make sense to include these IO in the ODS as they are NULL or Blank (the deault value). This can happen when for example, you first load in the ODS (Price and Quantity) and then you calculate Sell price later (Price * Quantity). of course it could be doen also in the Bex. Depends on other factors (Performance - Loaidng -Sizing)
4. Make sure that the KEY definition of ODS is accordingly to the data otherwise you will aggregate the data and later maybe if you need the detail you miss it.
for example: customer - product - Distr Chan - Sell Price
if each Customer can buy each product for any Distrution Channel, then when you build your ODS(Customer - Product and Distribution must be KEY) otherwise (if you have only Customer - Product KEY for example) you will lose the details for Distribution Channel.
I hope eveyrhting is clear
Regards
Mike

Content Distribution Fails

I have an issue where an application failed to distribute to 1 (EAPSCCM) of our 12 DPs so I removed the content from DP which it failed on as the redistribute option was failing.
However now I am not able to distribute the content back onto that DP, we are using distribution point groups to distribute the content to all the DPs. If I use the redistribute option on the DP group it doesn't add EAPSCCM back into the group.
I have also tried to just add it back onto just EAPSCCM instead of using the group the wizard completes but it never starts transfering it.
Even creating a new DP group with just EAPSCCM in doesn't add it into the targeted list when you look at content status.
What can I try to get this working? It is on a slow link as EAPSCCM is located in Australia our Primary site is in the UK.

Hi,
Could you see the application listed in the content distribution jobs when you use DP Job Manager tool?
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=36213
Best Regards,
Joyce
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

[SCCM 2012] Content distribution to DP's successfull status then in progress

Hello,
Had 70 DP on my infrastructure. A distribution group with around 200 contents is created and 70 DP are link to this DP group.
Every day I check the content distribution status, and the global pourcentage go up and down.
IE: Monday a DP is fully synched and the day after 10 contents are "in progress" and I have this thing on all DP's. Looks like that content distribution are done again an again....
Two weeks ago I had 15 DP fully distributed and now only 3... and no changes on the contents...
So I don't know what is the cause of this. Any idea?
Thanks in advance

We seem to be experiencing this issue in our environment and I just want to try and understand whether this is a bug that only reflects on status messages, or if the status messages reflect on the actual content, and thus, application and task sequence deployments?
I believe this is becoming a serious issue.
When the "Content is being distributed to the distribution point" messages first started surfacing, we noticed that certain packages (but not necessarily all), were being sent to all DP's, even when some of those packages weren't assigned to that
particular DP or the Boundary Group set up for content to that DP (we are viewing this in SCCM 2012 Monitoring | Distribution Status | Distribution Point Configuration Status, and the Details tab.) The biggest issue right now is that this recurrence of packages
redistributing, is causing task sequences to fail from distribution points that didn't actually have content redistributed to them.
And yes, validating content individually on those "in progress" packages does remediate the status message and eventually green light the DP. But validating content every time a DP is stood up, or content is distributed is becoming painstaking.
And scheduling Content Validation to occur more frequently only seems to be a band-aid that will not always help.
Is there any additional information on this malformed status message that can be provided? Is Microsoft working on a fix? We have not yet upgraded to SP1. Can anyone confirm the issue is resolved with SP1 or later, or if a hotfix exists to address the problem?

SCCM 2012 Content Distribution monitoring

Hi All
I am trying to enable alerts for content distributions on Primary Site Servers
Example: I have 1 PS server and multiple DPs and i am distributing/validating multiple packages from my PS Server to Multiple DPs on schduled basis.
The issue is for some reason if the content distributions/validations fails then i should get email alert (currently i am behind on Console or Offline Reports).
I tried creating custom Even Logs through status message filters which is not working
please help if anyone have already done alerting for failed content distributions
thanks
ananth

Yes, I know this is an old post, I'm just trying to clean them up.
Wouldn't this be better suited for OpsMgr?
http://www.enhansoft.com/

Content Distribution for updated Packages and Applications failing on DP's

Hi all,
Since installing SP1 for SCCM 2012 we have noted that our content distribution success rate has gone down considerably
We have a CAS, 5 Primaries and 78 DP's hanging off the various Primaries
The issue is with existing content by which it is failing on 90% of DP's when we update a package/application. Please note when we push out fresh, brand new content we get a 100% success rate
This is causing us a bit of a headache as we regularly update our OSD driver packages aswell as the security update packages
When we redistribute or update content we are presented with the below 'retying rename of' on random DP's with the content eventually erroring out
Each DP is the same, by which windows 2008 OS, Antivirus which is configured not to scan the D:\ volume and no mirroring enabled or alike configured
Is anyone else experiencing the same issue on content push?
Regards
Richard

Did you upgrade your DPs from 2007? If so, I'm experiencing the same issue.
I've filed a bug on Connect, please feel free to say you can reproduce it. I'm not sure how much help that would be, but it probably can't hurt:
https://connect.microsoft.com/ConfigurationManagervnext/feedback/details/787272/content-status-in-admin-console-of-migrated-packages-on-upgraded-distribution-points-is-unknown#details
Also, there's another forum post on this same subject:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/4d140368-2b60-4d23-8759-0867a181d8ee/sccm-2012-content-conversion

Create service Purchase Order automatically at goods issue in VL02N.

Hi Friends,
Please give me steps on how to write the ABAP code To Create service PO automatically at goods issue.
Technical Info
     BAPI BAPI_PO_CREATE1 is to be used for creating the service PO.
     The service PO will be only created for YLF deliveries.
     The PO will be created only if the shipping conditions field ( LIKP-VSBED ) has any value except 3rd party or Customer pick-up.
     The PO needs to be created when goods issue is performed on the delivery.
     The PO needs to be created with the following values :
1.     Purchase order type : YB
2.     Vendor : Header partner function SP, Carrier
3.     Plant : LIPS-WERKS
4.     Material : 10
5.     Account Assignment Category : K
6.     PO Quantity : 1
7.     Net price : LIKP-NETWR
8.     Cost Center : 54434
     On failing to save the PO, the error message should be generated so that the user knows the error and can fix the error and create the PO manually.
Please help for this urgent req.
thanks.
Message was edited by:
        anjan
Message was edited by:
        anjan

Sure. Here it is:
Go to SPRO.
Logistics Execution
Transportation
    Shipment cost
      Shipment cost document
         Shipment cost type and Item category.
For the shipment cost item category you are processing, lets say standard 0001 (Transportation costs). double click on it.
You will find all you need in the tab SETTLEMENT.
There, there is a field GENERATE PO.
Select one of the options:
     Do not generate purchase order
A     Generate purchase order for validity period of 1 day
B     Generate purchase order for validity period of 1 week
C     Generate purchase order for validity period of 1 month
Once the shipment cost is created and transfered to MM(settled), if there no open PO for the carrier, the system creates one.
Good luck,
Leonardo De Araujo

Need info - Automatic Kernel Distribution ? (CI - Solaris, DI - Windows)

Hi,
Our Central and DB Instance runs on Solaris / Oracle.
We are planning to install one more Application Server. ( Windows / Oracle ).
I heard that it is required to match the Kernel Patches using Automatic Kernel Distribution.
Could you please explain how should we achieve this Automatic Kernel Distribution so that the Kernel Patches of Central Instance and Dialog Instance can be matched.
Basic Information you may require:
●ERP6.0 DB Instance ( PRD)
　　　OS : solaris 10
       DB : oracle 10.2.0.2
       H/W: PRIMEPOWER650
　●ERP6.0 Application Server ( PRD )
　
　　　OS : Windows2003 sv
       H/W: RX200 S3
            x64
　　　MEM: 8GB
Thanks in anticipation
Best Regards
Paguras

Hello Paguras,
I would recommend that you take a look at the following SAP Note,
680617 INST: Appl.Server in Heterogeneous SAP System Environment
It should answer most of your questions about this type of configuration,
Regards,
David

Content Distribution Challenges

Content distribution is driving me a up a wall here. We've been pounding our heads against a desk for the last two weeks.
Long story short - one primary, seven remote DPs, varying WAN speeds. Also have one CloudDP.
Software distribution works fine.
Content distribution to the remote DPs and CloudDPs is NOT working fine.
When distributing content to the CloudDP, I get this from the pkgxfrmgr.log
ERROR: Could not get the package upload location! SMS_PACKAGE_TRANSFER_MANAGER 2/25/2013 8:07:24 AM 4324 (0x10E4)
STATMSG: ID=9303 SEV=E LEV=M SOURCE="SMS Server" COMP="SMS_CLOUD_CONTENT_MANAGER" SYS=CMblah.fqdn.com SITE=ugh PID=4716 TID=4324 GMTDATE=Mon Feb 25 15:07:24.711 2013 ISTR0="ugh00034" ISTR1="" ISTR2="" ISTR3="" ISTR4="" ISTR5="" ISTR6="" ISTR7="" ISTR8="" ISTR9="" NUMATTRS=2 AID0=400 AVAL0="ugh00034" AID1=404 AVAL1="["Display=\\(CloudDP).fqdn.com\"]MSWNET:["SMS_SITE=ugh"]\\(CloudDP).fqdn.com\" SMS_PACKAGE_TRANSFER_MANAGER 2/25/2013 8:07:24 AM 4324 (0x10E4)
WARNING: Warning - returning null/empty download address from content upload ugh00034 SMS_PACKAGE_TRANSFER_MANAGER 2/25/2013 8:07:24 AM 4324 (0x10E4)
STATMSG: ID=9310 SEV=W LEV=M SOURCE="SMS Server" COMP="SMS_CLOUD_CONTENT_MANAGER" SYS=CMblah.fqdn.com SITE=ugh PID=4716 TID=4324 GMTDATE=Mon Feb 25 15:07:24.724 2013 ISTR0="ugh00034" ISTR1="" ISTR2="" ISTR3="" ISTR4="" ISTR5="" ISTR6="" ISTR7="" ISTR8="" ISTR9="" NUMATTRS=2 AID0=400 AVAL0="00100034" AID1=404 AVAL1="["Display=\\(CloudDP).fqdn.com\"]MSWNET:["SMS_SITE=ugh"]\\(CloudDP).fqdn.com\" SMS_PACKAGE_TRANSFER_MANAGER 2/25/2013 8:07:24 AM 4324 (0x10E4)
Failed to generate contentinfo for the package. BranchCache feature might not be turned on. SMS_PACKAGE_TRANSFER_MANAGER 2/25/2013 8:07:24 AM 4324 (0x10E4)
When I remove the package and redistribute, there's a very good change it will succeed.
When I distribute to remote DPs on our WAN, I get the same "returning null/empty download address from content upload...." error.
Any ideas? I do have a ticket open with PSS, but lately it seems they are very overwhelmed.

I have seen the same a few times in different environments. I have also contacted Microsoft, hopefully I will get an answer soon. I know it might not be the answer you are looking for but now you know you are not alone.
Kent Agerlund | My blogs: blog.coretech.dk/kea and
SCUG.dk/ | Twitter:
@Agerlund | Linkedin: Kent Agerlund |
Mastering ConfigMgr 2012 The Fundamentals

Deactivate automatic content migration for Web Page Composer (WPC) 2

Hi,
on our production system we are using at the moment Web Page Composer for SAP NetWeaver 7.0. Soon we would like to upgrade the system to release 7.3
We have now already set up the content for the new Web Page Composer on a pre-production system. After the production system is upgraded to the new release, it is planned that we will transport the content for the new Web Page Composer from the pre-production to the production system.
As far as I know, the content of the old Web Page Composer gets automatically migrated during the upgrade of the production system. Due to the reason we will the use content of the pre-production system, the automatic migration step is not necessary anymore during the upgrade.
Is there any configuration option that allows us to disable the automatic migration of old Web Page Composer content?
Best regards
Mario

Regarding the feedback of the SAP support, it is not possible to deactivate the automatic content migration for the Web Page Composer.

Update on Captivate HTML 5 content playback issue in Google Chrome Browser

Good night,
I am having a problem implementing projects generated in html5 and run on Chrome. The video does not run.
I think I found the solution, a correction patch for Captivate 7. But I just link and is broken.
http://blogs.adobe.com/captivate/2014/07/update-on-captivate-html-5-content-playback-issue -in-google-chrome-browser.html
I have several e-learning generated with html5 and want to avoid make the change manually.
Does anyone have the patch and can share?
Thank U

I saw this email ID in a comment of that post. I guess you can send a mail asking for the fix.
Shriyansh Agnihotri: [email protected]
Sreekanth

IPhone Content Distribution

Hi,
We have software that has 2 parts to it. One part is the actual application and the other part is content for the application. Examples, of similar applications is mp3 players and mp3s, eBook readers and eBooks, etc. We sell our content and not our application. We are trying to figure out how to sell our content for the iPhone. We see a few possibilities
1. Bundle the content with the application and sell it on iTunes. We will certainly do this for our top content. However, this would require us to maintain over 400 applications on iTunes with 100's more on the way. This is just too costly for us to post all of our content to iTunes and maintain it. The other problem is that users will want their content to work together. So if they buy product A and product B they will want the content from both to work together. As far as I can tell right now the sandbox will prevent this, but I haven't done a lot of research on this yet.
2. Sell some content on iTunes and sell the rest of the content from our web site. We would NOT sell the actual application or any plugins to the application from our web site. We would just be selling content. The user would get the application from iTunes and then the application would download the content they have purchased from our web site.
Does anyone know if number 2 is permissible? As best we can tell from the SDK license agreement we can't sell plugins, applications, or unlock codes from our web site. We would be selling content for our application, but we are not sure if this is acceptable.
Consider a company like mobipocket (www.mobipocket.com). I doubt they are going to post their 30,000+ titles bundled with their reader to iTunes as separate applications. (I guess they would maybe do it if there was an automated way to do it). Or consider a company that wants to sell subscriptions to different newspapers. Does anyone know what kind of distribution model Apple will sanction for these situations?
Thanks,
Stephen

Scott,
Your proposal is the solution we have been thinking would be the best as well. We were looking at the SDK agreement and we were not sure about the following sections
3.3.2 An Application may not itself install or launch other executable code by any means, including without limitation through the use of a plug-in architecture, calling other frameworks, other APIs or otherwise. No interpreted code may be downloaded and used in an Application except for code that is interpreted and run by Apple's Published APIs and built-in interpreter(s).
3.3.3 Without Apple’s prior written approval, an Application may not provide, unlock or enable additional features or functionality through distribution mechanisms other than the iTunes Store.
So we were really wondering about 3.3.3 "enable additional features or functionality through distribution mechanisms other than the iTunes Store." Would content distribution over the web be considered enabling additional features or functionality? We would not be enabling different features or functionality in the software with our content. However, the application would display different data and information to the user based on the content that they purchased.
Stephen

Automatic content expiration

Hello,
In educational market we have an important feature lacking in current DPS implementation (maybe?). We need a way (API, Folio configuration, etc) to allow automatic content expiration. Consider an Editor that sells eletronic books for schools and wish to guarantees, according to his business model, an annual renovation fee to allow the school to continue using his content, of course using entitlement.
Is it possible already or should I post this on the feature request sub forum?
Best regards,
Luiz Ribeiro

This isn't something DPS supports today, and once a reader has downloaded content to their device it remains on their device until the reader chooses to remove it. There is no revocation support.
We have heard this request from other customers, and it's being considered for future releases.
Neil

Automatic Content Distribution issues

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for