Automatic DOP take more time to execute query
We upgraded database to oracle 11gR2. While testing Automatic DOP feature with our existing query it takes more time than with parallel.
Note: No constrains or Index created on table to gain performance while loading data (5000records / sec)
Os : Sun Solaris 64bit
CPU = 8
RAM = 7456M
Default parameter settings:
parallel_degree_policy string MANUAL
parallel_degree_limit string CPU
parallel_threads_per_cpu integer 2
arallel_degree_limit string CPU
cpu_count integer 8
parallel_threads_per_cpu integer 2
resource_manager_cpu_allocation integer 8
Query:
SELECT COUNT(*)
from (
SELECT
/*+ FIRST_ROWS(50), PARALLEL */
Query gets executed in 22minutes : execution plan
COUNT(*)
9600
Elapsed: 00:22:10.71
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 3765539975
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 21 | 2164K (1)| 07:12:52 | | |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 21 | | | | |
| 2 | PARTITION RANGE OR| | 89030 | 1825K| 2164K (1)| 07:12:52 |KEY(OR)|KEY(OR)|
|* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| SUBSCRIBER_EVENT | 89030 | 1825K| 2164K (1)| 07:12:52 |KEY(OR)|KEY(OR)|Automatic DOP Query: parameters set
alter session set PARALLEL_DEGREE_POLICY = limited;
alter session force parallel query ;Query:
SELECT COUNT(*)
from (
SELECT /*+ FIRST_ROWS(50), PARALLEL*/
This query takes more than 2hrs to execute
COUNT(*)
9600
Elapsed: 02:07:48.81
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 127536830
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart|Pstop | TQ |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 21 | 150K (1)| 00:30:01 | | | | | |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 21 | | | | | | | |
| 2 | PX COORDINATOR | | | | | | | | | | |
| 3 | PX SEND QC (RANDOM) | :TQ10000 | 1 | 21 | | | | | Q1,00 | P->S | QC (RAND) |
| 4 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 21 | | | | | Q1,00 | PCWP | |
| 5 | PX BLOCK ITERATOR | | 89030 | 1825K| 150K (1)| 00:30:01 |KEY(OR)|KEY(OR)| Q1,00 | PCWC | |
|* 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| SUBSCRIBER_EVENT | 89030 | 1825K| 150K (1)| 00:30:01 |KEY(OR)|KEY(OR)| Q1,00 | PCWP | |
Note
- automatic DOP: Computed Degree of Parallelism is 16 because of degree limitcan some one help us to find out where we did wrong or any pointer will really helpful to resolve an issue.
Edited by: Sachin B on May 11, 2010 4:05 AM
Generated AWR report for ADOP
Foreground Wait Events DB/Inst: HDB/hdb Snaps: 158-161
-> s - second, ms - millisecond - 1000th of a second
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
Avg
%Time Total Wait wait Waits % DB
Event Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) /txn time
direct path read 522,173 0 125,051 239 628.4 99.3
db file sequential read 663 0 156 235 0.8 .1
log file sync 165 0 117 712 0.2 .1
Disk file operations I/O 267 0 63 236 0.3 .1
db file scattered read 251 0 36 145 0.3 .0
control file sequential re 217 0 32 149 0.3 .0
library cache load lock 2 0 10 4797 0.0 .0
cursor: pin S wait on X 3 0 9 3149 0.0 .0
read by other session 5 0 2 429 0.0 .0
kfk: async disk IO 613,170 0 2 0 737.9 .0
sort segment request 1 100 1 1007 0.0 .0
os thread startup 16 0 1 43 0.0 .0
direct path write temp 1 0 1 527 0.0 .0
latch free 51 0 0 2 0.1 .0
kksfbc child completion 1 100 0 59 0.0 .0
latch: cache buffers chain 19 0 0 2 0.0 .0
latch: shared pool 36 0 0 1 0.0 .0
PX Deq: Slave Session Stat 21 0 0 1 0.0 .0
library cache: mutex X 45 0 0 1 0.1 .0
CSS initialization 2 0 0 6 0.0 .0
enq: KO - fast object chec 1 0 0 11 0.0 .0
buffer busy waits 3 0 0 1 0.0 .0
cursor: pin S 9 0 0 0 0.0 .0
CSS operation: action 2 0 0 1 0.0 .0
direct path write 1 0 0 2 0.0 .0
jobq slave wait 17,554 100 8,942 509 21.1
PX Deq: Execute Reply 4,060 95 7,870 1938 4.9
SQL*Net message from clien 96 0 5,756 59962 0.1
PX Deq: Execution Msg 618 56 712 1152 0.7
KSV master wait 11 0 0 2 0.0
PX Deq: Join ACK 16 0 0 1 0.0
PX Deq: Parse Reply 14 0 0 1 0.0
Background Wait Events DB/Inst: HDB/hdb Snaps: 158-161
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
Avg
%Time Total Wait wait Waits % bg
Event Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) /txn time
control file sequential re 6,249 0 2,375 380 7.5 55.6
control file parallel writ 2,003 0 744 371 2.4 17.4
db file parallel write 1,604 0 503 313 1.9 11.8
log file parallel write 861 0 320 371 1.0 7.5
db file sequential read 363 0 151 415 0.4 3.5
db file scattered read 152 0 64 421 0.2 1.5
Disk file operations I/O 276 0 21 77 0.3 .5
os thread startup 316 0 15 48 0.4 .4
ADR block file read 24 0 11 450 0.0 .3
rdbms ipc reply 17 12 7 403 0.0 .2
Data file init write 6 0 6 1016 0.0 .1
direct path write 21 0 6 287 0.0 .1
log file sync 7 0 6 796 0.0 .1
ADR block file write 10 0 4 414 0.0 .1
enq: JS - queue lock 1 0 3 2535 0.0 .1
ASM file metadata operatio 1,801 0 2 1 2.2 .0
db file parallel read 30 0 1 40 0.0 .0
kfk: async disk IO 955 0 1 1 1.1 .0
db file single write 1 0 0 415 0.0 .0
reliable message 10 0 0 23 0.0 .0
latch: shared pool 75 0 0 2 0.1 .0
latch: call allocation 26 0 0 2 0.0 .0
CSS initialization 7 0 0 6 0.0 .0
asynch descriptor resize 352 100 0 0 0.4 .0
undo segment extension 2 100 0 5 0.0 .0
CSS operation: action 9 0 0 1 0.0 .0
CSS operation: query 42 0 0 0 0.1 .0
latch: parallel query allo 4 0 0 0 0.0 .0
rdbms ipc message 37,948 97 104,599 2756 45.7
DIAG idle wait 16,762 100 16,927 1010 20.2
ASM background timer 1,724 0 8,467 4912 2.1
shared server idle wait 282 100 8,465 30019 0.3
pmon timer 3,123 90 8,465 2711 3.8
wait for unread message on 8,381 100 8,465 1010 10.1
dispatcher timer 141 100 8,463 60019 0.2
Streams AQ: qmn coordinato 604 50 8,462 14010 0.7
Streams AQ: qmn slave idle 304 0 8,462 27836 0.4
smon timer 35 71 8,382 239496 0.0
Space Manager: slave idle 1,621 99 8,083 4986 2.0
PX Idle Wait 2,392 99 4,739 1981 2.9
class slave wait 46 0 623 13546 0.1
KSV master wait 2 0 0 27 0.0
SQL*Net message from clien 7 0 0 1 0.0
Wait Event Histogram DB/Inst: HDB/hdb Snaps: 158-161
-> Units for Total Waits column: K is 1000, M is 1000000, G is 1000000000
-> % of Waits: value of .0 indicates value was <.05%; value of null is truly 0
-> % of Waits: column heading of <=1s is truly <1024ms, >1s is truly >=1024ms
-> Ordered by Event (idle events last)
% of Waits
Total
Event Waits <1ms <2ms <4ms <8ms <16ms <32ms <=1s >1s
ADR block file read 24 100.0
ADR block file write 10 100.0
ADR file lock 12 100.0
ASM file metadata operatio 1812 99.0 .3 .4 .2 .1
CSS initialization 9 100.0
CSS operation: action 11 90.9 9.1
CSS operation: query 54 100.0
Data file init write 6 16.7 16.7 16.7 50.0
Disk file operations I/O 533 88.7 2.6 .6 1.5 .2 6.4
PX Deq: Signal ACK EXT 4 100.0
PX Deq: Signal ACK RSG 2 100.0
PX Deq: Slave Session Stat 21 42.9 28.6 28.6
SQL*Net break/reset to cli 6 100.0
SQL*Net message to client 102 100.0
SQL*Net more data to clien 4 100.0
asynch descriptor resize 527 100.0
buffer busy waits 4 75.0 25.0
control file parallel writ 2003 9.3 .5 .0 .1 90.0
control file sequential re 6466 10.6 .0 .0 .0 .1 .2 89.0
cursor: pin S 9 100.0
cursor: pin S wait on X 3 33.3 33.3 33.3
db file parallel read 30 6.7 30.0 63.3
db file parallel write 1604 7.4 .1 .6 16.5 75.5
db file scattered read 403 3.7 .2 2.5 13.6 14.9 3.5 61.5
db file sequential read 1017 12.3 .8 2.3 7.3 6.6 2.0 68.8
db file single write 1 100.0
direct path read 522.2 2.2 2.1 .1 .0 1.8 17.9 75.9
direct path write 22 4.5 4.5 90.9
direct path write temp 1 100.0
enq: JS - queue lock 1 100.0
enq: KO - fast object chec 1 100.0
enq: PS - contention 1 100.0
kfk: async disk IO 614.1 100.0 .0
kksfbc child completion 1 100.0
latch free 58 46.6 27.6 15.5 10.3
latch: cache buffers chain 19 36.8 10.5 52.6
latch: call allocation 26 76.9 11.5 7.7 3.8
latch: parallel query allo 4 100.0
latch: shared pool 111 44.1 28.8 27.0
library cache load lock 2 100.0
library cache: mutex X 45 84.4 8.9 4.4 2.2
log file parallel write 861 10.0 .1 .1 89.5 .2
log file sync 172 6.4 90.1 3.5
os thread startup 332 100.0
rdbms ipc reply 18 72.2 11.1 16.7
read by other session 5 100.0
reliable message 11 81.8 9.1 9.1
sort segment request 1 100.0
undo segment extension 2 50.0 50.0
ASM background timer 1724 .8 .6 .1 .6 97.9
DIAG idle wait 16.8K 100.0
KSV master wait 13 7.7 23.1 61.5 7.7
PX Deq: Execute Reply 4060 .4 .0 .0 .1 3.4 96.0
PX Deq: Execution Msg 617 34.7 1.5 2.4 1.5 1.5 .2 .8 57.5
PX Deq: Join ACK 16 93.8 6.3
PX Deq: Parse Reply 14 71.4 7.1 14.3 7.1
PX Idle Wait 2384 .0 .6 99.3
SQL*Net message from clien 103 82.5 1.0 1.9 1.0 13.6
Space Manager: slave idle 1621 .2 99.8
Streams AQ: qmn coordinato 604 50.0 50.0
Wait Event Histogram DB/Inst: HDB/hdb Snaps: 158-161
-> Units for Total Waits column: K is 1000, M is 1000000, G is 1000000000
-> % of Waits: value of .0 indicates value was <.05%; value of null is truly 0
-> % of Waits: column heading of <=1s is truly <1024ms, >1s is truly >=1024ms
-> Ordered by Event (idle events last)Edited by: Sachin B on May 11, 2010 4:52 AM
Similar Messages
-
Count (*) for select stmt take more time than execute a that sql stmt
HI
count (*) for select stmt take more time than execute a that sql stmt
executing particular select stmt take 2.47 mins but select stmt is using the /*+parallel*/ (sql optimer) in that sql command for faster execute .
but if i tried to find out total number of rows in that query it takes more time ..
almost 2.30 hrs still running to find count(col)
please help me to get count of row faster.
thanks in advance...797525 wrote:
HI
count (*) for select stmt take more time than execute a that sql stmt
executing particular select stmt take 2.47 mins but select stmt is using the /*+parallel*/ (sql optimer) in that sql command for faster execute .
but if i tried to find out total number of rows in that query it takes more time ..
almost 2.30 hrs still running to find count(col)
please help me to get count of row faster.
thanks in advance...That may be because your client is displaying only the first few records when you are running the "SELECT *". But when you run "COUNT(*)", the whole records has to be counted.
As already mentined please read teh FAQ to post tuning questions. -
What is the reason for query take more time to execute
Hi,
What is the reason for the query take more time inside procedure.
but if i execute that query alone then it excute within a minutes.
query includes update and insert.I have a insert and update query when I execute
without Procedure then that query execute faster but
If I execute inside procedure then It takes 2 hours
to execute.Put you watch 2 hours back and the problem will disappear.
do you understand what I want to say?I understood what you wanted to say and I understood you didn't understood what I said.
What does the procedure, what does the query, how can you say the query does the same as the procedure that takes longer. You didn't say anything useful to have an idea of what you're talking about.
Everyone knows what means that something is slower than something else, but it means nothing if you don't say what you're talking about.
To begin with something take a look at this
When your query takes too long ...
especially the part regarding the trace.
Bye Alessandro -
Query take more time to execute
Hi
I am using in sql select statement two non exist statements it is taken more time to execute the query ,non exist is any impact query performance
thank's[email protected] wrote:
I am using in sql select statement two non exist statements it is taken more time to execute the query ,non exist is any impact query performanceI have a query that is using even more time to execute. Do I win? -
SYS_REFCURSOR takes more time than direct query execution
I have a stored proc which has 4 inputs and 10 output and all outputs are sys_refcursor type.
Among 10 ouputs, 1 cursor returns 4k+ records and all other cursors has 3 or 4 records and average 5 columns in each cursors. For this, it takes 8 sec to complete the execution. If we directly query, it gives output in .025 sec.
I verified code located the issue with cursor which returns 4k+ only.
The cursor opening from a temporary table (which has 4k+ records ) without any filter. The query which inserted into temporary is direct inserts only and i found nothing to modify there.
Can anyone suggest, how we can bring the results in less than 3 sec? This is really a challenge since the code needs to go live next week.
Any help appreciated.
Thanks
RenjishI've just repeated the test in SQL*Plus on my test database.
Both the ref cursor and direct SQL took 4.75 seconds.
However, that time is not the time to execute the SQL statement, but the time it took SQL*Plus in my command window to print out the 3999 rows of results.
SQL> create or replace PROCEDURE TEST_PROC (O_OUTPUT OUT SYS_REFCURSOR) is
2 BEGIN
3 OPEN O_OUTPUT FOR
4 select 11 plan_num, 22 loc_num, 'aaa' loc_nm from dual connect by level < 4000;
5 end;
6 /
Procedure created.
SQL> set timing on
SQL> set linesize 1000
SQL> set serverout on
SQL> var o_output refcursor;
SQL> exec test_proc(:o_output);
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.04
SQL> print o_output;
PLAN_NUM LOC_NUM LOC
11 22 aaa
11 22 aaa
11 22 aaa
11 22 aaa
11 22 aaa
3999 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:04.75
SQL> select 11 plan_num, 22 loc_num, 'aaa' loc_nm from dual connect by level < 4000;
PLAN_NUM LOC_NUM LOC
11 22 aaa
11 22 aaa
11 22 aaa
11 22 aaa
11 22 aaa
11 22 aaa
3999 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:04.75
That's the result I expect to see, both taking the same amount of time to do the same thing.
Please demonstrate how you are running it and getting different results. -
"3.x Analyzer Server" EVENT taking more Time when Executing Query
Hi All,
When I am Executing the Query Through RSRT taking more time. When I have checked the statistics
and observed that "3.x Analyzer Server" EVENT taking more Time .
What I have to do , How I will reduce this 3.x Analyzer Server EVENT time.
Please Suggest me.
Thanks,
Kiran ManyamHello,
Chk this on query performance:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/ce7fb368-0601-0010-64ba-fadc985a1f94
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/4c0ab590-0201-0010-bd9a-8332d8b4f09c
Query Performance
Reg,
Dhanya -
Dum or take more time to execute this query
SELECT AFPOAMEIN AFPOAUFNR AFPOMATNR AFPOPSMNG AFPO~PWERK
AFPOWEMNG AUFMAUFNR AUFMBUDAT AUFMBWART AUFM~CHARG
AUFMDMBTR AUFMERFME AUFMERFMG AUFMMATNR AUFM~MEINS
AUFMMENGE AUFMSHKZG AUFMWAERS AUFMWERKS MARA~MATKL
MARAMATNR MARAMTART MARCDISPO MARCMATNR MARC~PRCTR
MARCWERKS AFPODWERK
INTO (AFPO-AMEIN , AFPO-AUFNR , AFPO-MATNR , AFPO-PSMNG , AFPO-PWERK
, AFPO-WEMNG , AUFM-AUFNR , AUFM-BUDAT , AUFM-BWART , AUFM-CHARG
, AUFM-DMBTR , AUFM-ERFME , AUFM-ERFMG , AUFM-MATNR , AUFM-MEINS
, AUFM-MENGE , AUFM-SHKZG , AUFM-WAERS , AUFM-WERKS , MARA-MATKL
, MARA-MATNR , MARA-MTART , MARC-DISPO , MARC-MATNR , MARC-PRCTR
, MARC-WERKS , AFPO-DWERK )
FROM ( AFPO
INNER JOIN AUFM
ON AUFMAUFNR = AFPOAUFNR
INNER JOIN MARA
ON MARAMATNR = AUFMMATNR
INNER JOIN MARC
ON MARCMATNR = AFPOMATNR
AND MARCWERKS = AFPODWERK )
WHERE AFPO~AUFNR IN SP$00001
AND AUFM~BUDAT IN SP$00002
AND AUFM~BWART IN SP$00003
AND AUFM~CHARG IN SP$00006
AND AUFM~MATNR IN SP$00004
AND AUFM~WERKS IN SP$00005
AND MARA~MATKL IN SP$00008
AND MARA~MTART IN SP$00007
AND MARC~DISPO IN SP$00009
AND MARC~PRCTR IN SP$00010.
***for work center and work center text
SELECT S022objnr s022arbpl crhdobjid crtxktext
INTO (S022-objnr,s022-arbpl ,crhd-objid ,crtx-ktext)
from ( s022
inner join crhd
on crhdarbpl = s022arbpl
inner join crtx
on crtxobjid = crhdobjid
and crtx~objty = 'A'
and crtx~spras = 'EN'
where
S022~aufnr = AFPO-AUFNR
and s022~werks = afpo-dwerk
and crhd~werks = AFPO-DWERK
and s022~objnr like '%1'.
endselect.
%DBACC = %DBACC - 1.
IF %DBACC = 0.
STOP.
ENDIF.
if aufm-bwart = '262'.
aufm-menge = 0 - aufm-menge.
endif.
if aufm-bwart = '102'.
aufm-menge = 0 - aufm-menge.
endif.
if aufm-shkzg = 'S'.
aufm-dmbtr = 0 - aufm-dmbtr.
endif.
CHECK SP$00001.
CHECK SP$00002.
CHECK SP$00003.
CHECK SP$00006.
CHECK SP$00004.
CHECK SP$00005.
CHECK SP$00008.
CHECK SP$00007.
CHECK SP$00009.
CHECK SP$00010.
ADD 1 TO %COUNT-AFPO.
%LINR-AFPO = '01'.
EXTRACT %FG01.
%EXT-AUFM01 = 'X'.
EXTRACT %FGWRAUFM01.
%EXT-AFPO01 = 'X'.
EXTRACT %FGWRAFPO01.
ENDSELECT.
when i run this its dumpHi
u have used
1.select...
2.select
2.endselect
1.endselect.
instead of 1.select,
select entries
into itab1.
instead of 2.select,
select entries into itab2
for all entries in itab1
and give the fields u want from itab1 in the where condition.
this will avoid loops and reduce exec time.
also avoid inner join.
reg
Ramya -
Threaded program takes more time than executing serially!
Hello All
Ive converted my program into a threaded application so as to improve speed. However i found that after converting the execution time is more than it was when the program was non threaded. Im not having any synchronised methods. Any idea what could be the reason ?
Thanx in advance.Putting aside fstreams amusing comment, I suspect your
theads are never yielding (they are sitting in a tight
loop, thus taking all available procesor power). Try
adding Thread.sleep(0) at som point in the loop.No. If you just want to encourage one thread to give another thread a turn, use yield, not sleep.
Note, though, that this may not help your situation. As was pointed out, on a single CPU machine, the only way a multithreaded program will run faster (by which I mean total wall-clock time start to finish) than its single-threaded equivalent is if the 1-thread version spends a lot of time waiting for IO when it could be doing something else. (If it's waiting for IO, but that IO is needed for the big number crunching, then putting the crunching in another thread won't make things any faster.)
On the other hand, if by "faster" you're referring to a more responsive GUI, then, yes, in general you might expect better GUI response be putting non-GUI stuff in a different thread, but there's no guarantee. Depending on what the other thread does, how much work your GUI has to do, how your VM's scheduler works, how you've split up the work, etc., it may not be any better.
I know that's not very specific, but neither was your question. -
Hi
The following delete takes more time to execute.
DELETE FROM credential_on
WHERE credential_on_id IN (SELECT credential_on_id
FROM credential_on_appl
WHERE appn_num <= ANY (SELECT appn_num
FROM masterdriver));
Is there a way to tune this statement.
Regards,
XJDExplain plan for the delete query
OPERATION OPTIONS OBJECT_NAME OPTIMIZER
DELETE STATEMENT CREDENTIAL_ON CHOOSE
DELETE
MERGE JOIN
SORT JOIN
TABLE ACCESS CREDENTIAL_ON
SORT JOIN
VIEW VW_NSO_1
SORT UNIQUE
FILTER
NESTED LOOPS
TABLE ACCESS FULL CREDENTIAL_ON_APPL
TABLE ACCESS FULL MASTERDRIVER -
Calc takes more time than previous
Hi All,
I have a problem with the calc as this calc take more time to execute please help!!!
I have included calc cache high in the .cfg file.
FIX (&As, &Af, &C,&RM, @RELATIVE("Pr",0), @RELATIVE("MS",0), @RELATIVE("Pt",0), @RELATIVE("Rn",0),@RELATIVE("Ll",0))
CLEARDATA "RI";
/* 22 Comment */
FIX("100")
"RI" = @ROUND ((("RDL")/("SBE"->"RDL"->"TMS"->"TP"->"TR"->"AF"->"Boom")),8);
ENDFIX
FIX("200")
"RI" = @ROUND ((("RDL")/("ODE"->"RDL"->"TMS"->"T_P"->"TR"->"AF"->"Boom")),8);
ENDFIX
Appriciate your help.
Regards,
Mink.Mink,
If the calculation script ,which you are using is the same which performed better before and data being processes is same ( i mean data might not have exceptionally grown more).Then, there must be other reasons like server side OS , processor or memory issues.Consult sys admin .Atleast you ll be sure that there is nothing wrong with systems.
To fine tune the calc , i think , you can minimise fix statements . But,thats not the current issue though
Sandeep Reddy Enti
HCC
http://analytiks.blogspot.com -
Query Takes more Time when i execute from the Instant client.
Hi,
Currently in our Env we have some Queries takes more time when we run from the Instant Client.
System Details
OS=Solaris 10 x86 64bit
Oracle 10.2.0.4
Client Side
$ sqlplus trd_trd_ro/trd_trd_ro@prdba001/TRADE1
SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.2.0 - Production on Mon Aug 9 16:26:25 2010
Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
Connected to:
Oracle Database 10g Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
SQL> set timing on
SQL> select mod(lastinstmessagesequence, 1000000000) LastInstIDSeqNo from tibex_msgseqbyuseralias where useralias='2221';
no rows selected
Elapsed: 00:01:54.19
SQL> Disconnected from Oracle Database 10g Release 10.2.0.4.0 - ProductionSame Query running on Server Side
^C130-oracle@prdba001 txt: sql
Database: trd_trd_owner/trd_trd_owner@prdba001/TRADE1
SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production on Mon Aug 9 17:15:18 2010
Copyright (c) 1982, 2007, Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
Connected to:
Oracle Database 10g Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
trd_trd_owner@TRADE1> set timing on
trd_trd_owner@TRADE1> select mod(lastinstmessagesequence, 1000000000) LastInstIDSeqNo from tibex_msgseqbyuseralias where useralias='2221';
no rows selected
Elapsed: 00:00:00.12
trd_trd_owner@TRADE1> exitKindly help me what could be the Issues.Hi Charles,
Thanks for your Quick response.I pulled the info.
sys@TRADE1> SELECT * FROM TABLE(DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY_CURSOR('bpxr7axhxaqvy',NULL,'ALLSTATS LAST'));
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
SQL_ID bpxr7axhxaqvy, child number 0
select /*+ GATHER_PLAN_STATISTICS */ mod(lastinstmessagesequence, :"SYS_B_0") LastInstIDSeqNo from
tibex_msgseqbyuseralias where useralias=:"SYS_B_1"
Plan hash value: 1955857846
| Id | Operation | Name | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows | A-Time | Buffers |
| 1 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 21 | 0 |00:00:00.06 | 6121 |
| 2 | VIEW | | 1 | 21 | 0 |00:00:00.06 | 6121 |
| 3 | UNION-ALL | | 1 | | 0 |00:00:00.06 | 6121 |
| 4 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.05 | 3073 |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_QUOTE | 1 | 30080 | 0 |00:00:00.05 | 3073 |
| 6 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
| 7 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TIBEX_ORDER | 1 | 971 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 8 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | TIBEX_ORDER_IDX_OLT | 1 | 971 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
| 9 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 10 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_TSTRADE | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
| 11 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_IOIREQUEST | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
| 13 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 126 |
|* 14 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_BESTEXREL | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 126 |
| 15 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 2862 |
|* 16 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN | SYS_C0058325 | 1 | 339 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 2862 |
| 17 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 31 |
|* 18 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_EDPPULLORDERS | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 31 |
| 19 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 20 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058803 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 21 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 22 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0057785 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 23 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 24 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0057827 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 25 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 26 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_DELETEADMIN | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
| 27 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 28 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058148 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 29 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 30 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058264 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 31 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 32 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058516 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 33 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 34 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058561 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 35 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 36 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058783 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 37 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 38 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058977 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 39 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 40 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058859 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 41 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 42 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0059197 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 43 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 44 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_CANCELTRDADMIN | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
| 45 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 46 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_BULKCANCELADMIN | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
5 - filter("LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
8 - access("LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
10 - filter(("LASTINSTUSERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
12 - filter(("LASTINSTUSERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
14 - filter(("LASTINSTUSERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
16 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
18 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
20 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
22 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
24 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
26 - filter(("USERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
28 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
30 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
32 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
34 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
36 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
38 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
40 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
42 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
44 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
46 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
SQL_ID bpxr7axhxaqvy, child number 1
select /*+ GATHER_PLAN_STATISTICS */ mod(lastinstmessagesequence, :"SYS_B_0") LastInstIDSeqNo from
tibex_msgseqbyuseralias where useralias=:"SYS_B_1"
Plan hash value: 1955857846
Plan hash value: 1955857846
| Id | Operation | Name | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows | A-Time | Buffers |
| 1 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 21 | 0 |00:00:00.12 | 8545 |
| 2 | VIEW | | 1 | 21 | 0 |00:00:00.12 | 8545 |
| 3 | UNION-ALL | | 1 | | 0 |00:00:00.12 | 8545 |
| 4 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.10 | 5496 |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_QUOTE | 1 | 21056 | 0 |00:00:00.10 | 5496 |
| 6 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 4 |
| 7 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TIBEX_ORDER | 1 | 660 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 4 |
|* 8 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | TIBEX_ORDER_IDX_OLT | 1 | 660 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 4 |
| 9 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 10 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_TSTRADE | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
| 11 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_IOIREQUEST | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
| 13 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 126 |
|* 14 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_BESTEXREL | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 126 |
| 15 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.02 | 2862 |
|* 16 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN | SYS_C0058325 | 1 | 339 | 0 |00:00:00.02 | 2862 |
| 17 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 31 |
|* 18 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_EDPPULLORDERS | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 31 |
| 19 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 20 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058803 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 21 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 22 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0057785 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 23 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 24 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0057827 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 25 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 26 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_DELETEADMIN | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
| 27 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 28 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058148 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 29 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
|* 30 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058264 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 31 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 32 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058516 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 33 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 34 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058561 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 35 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 36 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058783 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 37 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 38 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058977 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 39 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 40 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058859 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 41 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 42 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0059197 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 43 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 44 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_CANCELTRDADMIN | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
| 45 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 46 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_BULKCANCELADMIN | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
5 - filter("LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
8 - access("LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
10 - filter(("LASTINSTUSERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
12 - filter(("LASTINSTUSERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
14 - filter(("LASTINSTUSERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
16 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
18 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
20 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
22 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
24 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
26 - filter(("USERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
28 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
30 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
32 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
34 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
36 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
38 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
40 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
42 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
44 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
46 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
SQL_ID bpxr7axhxaqvy, child number 2
select /*+ GATHER_PLAN_STATISTICS */ mod(lastinstmessagesequence, :"SYS_B_0") LastInstIDSeqNo from
tibex_msgseqbyuseralias where useralias=:"SYS_B_1"
Plan hash value: 1955857846
| Id | Operation | Name | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows | A-Time | Buffers | Reads |
| 1 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 21 | 1 |00:00:00.13 | 8476 | 3 |
| 2 | VIEW | | 1 | 21 | 1 |00:00:00.13 | 8476 | 3 |
| 3 | UNION-ALL | | 1 | | 1 |00:00:00.13 | 8476 | 3 |
| 4 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.10 | 5283 | 0 |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_QUOTE | 1 | 21056 | 0 |00:00:00.10 | 5283 | 0 |
| 6 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 1 |00:00:00.01 | 148 | 3 |
| 7 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TIBEX_ORDER | 1 | 660 | 150 |00:00:00.01 | 148 | 3 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
|* 8 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | TIBEX_ORDER_IDX_OLT | 1 | 660 | 150 |00:00:00.01 | 5 | 0 |
| 9 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
|* 10 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_TSTRADE | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
| 11 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
|* 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_IOIREQUEST | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
| 13 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 126 | 0 |
|* 14 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_BESTEXREL | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 126 | 0 |
| 15 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.02 | 2862 | 0 |
|* 16 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN | SYS_C0058325 | 1 | 339 | 0 |00:00:00.02 | 2862 | 0 |
| 17 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 31 | 0 |
|* 18 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_EDPPULLORDERS | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 31 | 0 |
| 19 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 20 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058803 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 21 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 22 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0057785 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 23 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 24 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0057827 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 25 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
|* 26 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_DELETEADMIN | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
| 27 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 28 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058148 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 29 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 30 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058264 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 31 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 32 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058516 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 33 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 34 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058561 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 35 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 36 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058783 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 37 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 38 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058977 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 39 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 40 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058859 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 41 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 42 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0059197 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 43 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
|* 44 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_CANCELTRDADMIN | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
| 45 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
|* 46 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_BULKCANCELADMIN | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
5 - filter("LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
8 - access("LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
10 - filter(("LASTINSTUSERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
12 - filter(("LASTINSTUSERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
14 - filter(("LASTINSTUSERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
16 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
18 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
20 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
22 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
24 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
26 - filter(("USERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
28 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
30 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
32 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
34 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
36 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
38 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
40 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
42 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
44 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
46 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
249 rows selected. -
Stopping a Query taking more time to execute in runtime in Oracle Forms.
Hi,
In the present application one of the oracle form screen is taking long time to execute a query, user wanted an option to stop the query in between and browse the result (whatever has been fetched before stopping the query).
We have tried three approach.
1. set max fetch record in form and block level.
2. set max fetch time in form and block level.
in above two method does not provide the appropiate solution for us.
3. the third approach we applied is setting the interaction mode to "NON BLOCKING" at the form level.
It seems to be worked, while the query took long time to execute, oracle app server prompts an message to press Esc to cancel the query and it a displaying the results fetched upto that point.
But the drawback is one pressing esc, its killing the session itself. which is causing the entire application to collapse.
Please suggest if there is any alternative approach for this or how to overcome this perticular scenario.
This kind of facility is alreday present in TOAD and PL/SQL developer where we can stop an executing query and browse the results fetched upto that point, is the similar facility is avialable in oracle forms ,please suggest.
Thanks and Regards,
Suraj
Edited by: user10673131 on Jun 25, 2009 4:55 AMHello Friend,
You query will definitely take more time or even fail in PROD,becuase the way it is written. Here are my few observations, may be it can help :-
1. XLA_AR_INV_AEL_SL_V XLA_AEL_SL_V : Never use a view inside such a long query , becuase View is just a window to the records.
and when used to join other table records, then all those tables which are used to create a view also becomes part of joining conition.
First of all please check if you really need this view. I guess you are using to check if the records have been created as Journal entries or not ?
Please check the possbility of finding it through other AR tables.
2. Remove _ALL tables instead use the corresponding org specific views (if you are in 11i ) or the sysnonymns ( in R12 )
For example : For ra_cust_trx_types_all use ra_cust_trx_types.
This will ensure that the query will execute only for those ORG_IDs which are assigned to that responsibility.
3. Check with the DBA whether the GATHER SCHEMA STATS have been run atleast for ONT and RA tables.
You can also check the same using
SELECT LAST_ANALYZED FROM ALL_TABLES WHERE TABLE_NAME = 'ra_customer_trx_all'.
If the tables are not analyzed , the CBO will not be able to tune your query.
4. Try to remove the DISTINCT keyword. This is the MAJOR reason for this problem.
5. If its a report , try to separate the logic in separate queries ( using a procedure ) and then populate the whole data in custom table, and use this custom table for generating the
report.
Thanks,
Neeraj Shrivastava
[email protected]
Edited by: user9352949 on Oct 1, 2010 8:02 PM
Edited by: user9352949 on Oct 1, 2010 8:03 PM -
Query is taking more time to execute in PROD
Hi All,
Can anyone tell me why this query is taking more time when I am using for single trx_number record it is working fine but when I am trying to use all the records it is not fatching any records and it is keep on running.
SELECT DISTINCT OOH.HEADER_ID
,OOH.ORG_ID
,ct.CUSTOMER_TRX_ID
,ool.ship_from_org_id
,ct.trx_number IDP_SHIPMENT_ID
,ctt.type STATUS_CODE
,SYSDATE STATUS_DATE
,ooh.attribute16 IDP_ORDER_NBR --Change based on testing on 21-JUL-2010 in UAT
,lpad(rac_bill.account_number,6,0) IDP_BILL_TO_CUSTOMER_NBR
,rac_bill.orig_system_reference
,rac_ship_party.party_name SHIP_TO_NAME
,raa_ship_loc.address1 SHIP_TO_ADDR1
,raa_ship_loc.address2 SHIP_TO_ADDR2
,raa_ship_loc.address3 SHIP_TO_ADDR3
,raa_ship_loc.address4 SHIP_TO_ADDR4
,raa_ship_loc.city SHIP_TO_CITY
,NVL(raa_ship_loc.state,raa_ship_loc.province) SHIP_TO_STATE
,raa_ship_loc.country SHIP_TO_COUNTRY_NAME
,raa_ship_loc.postal_code SHIP_TO_ZIP
,ooh.CUST_PO_NUMBER CUSTOMER_ORDER_NBR
,ooh.creation_date CUSTOMER_ORDER_DATE
,ool.actual_shipment_date DATE_SHIPPED
,DECODE(mp.organization_code,'CHP', 'CHESAPEAKE'
,'CSB', 'CHESAPEAKE'
,'DEP', 'CHESAPEAKE'
,'CHESAPEAKE') SHIPPED_FROM_LOCATION --'MEMPHIS' --'HOUSTON'
,ooh.freight_carrier_code FREIGHT_CARRIER
,NVL(XX_FSG_NA_FASTRAQ_IFACE.get_invoice_amount ('FREIGHT',ct.customer_trx_id,ct.org_id),0)
+ NVL(XX_FSG_NA_FASTRAQ_IFACE.get_line_fr_amt ('FREIGHT',ct.customer_trx_id,ct.org_id),0)FREIGHT_CHARGE
,ooh.freight_terms_code FREIGHT_TERMS
,'' IDP_BILL_OF_LADING
,(SELECT WAYBILL
FROM WSH_DELIVERY_DETAILS_OE_V
WHERE -1=-1
AND SOURCE_HEADER_ID = ooh.header_id
AND SOURCE_LINE_ID = ool.line_id
AND ROWNUM =1) WAYBILL_CARRIER
,'' CONTAINERS
,ct.trx_number INVOICE_NBR
,ct.trx_date INVOICE_DATE
,NVL(XX_FSG_NA_FASTRAQ_IFACE.get_invoice_amount ('LINE',ct.customer_trx_id,ct.org_id),0) +
NVL(XX_FSG_NA_FASTRAQ_IFACE.get_invoice_amount ('TAX',ct.customer_trx_id,ct.org_id),0) +
NVL(XX_FSG_NA_FASTRAQ_IFACE.get_invoice_amount ('FREIGHT',ct.customer_trx_id,ct.org_id),0)INVOICE_AMOUNT
,NULL IDP_TAX_IDENTIFICATION_NBR
,NVL(XX_FSG_NA_FASTRAQ_IFACE.get_invoice_amount ('TAX',ct.customer_trx_id,ct.org_id),0) TAX_AMOUNT_1
,NULL TAX_DESC_1
,NULL TAX_AMOUNT_2
,NULL TAX_DESC_2
,rt.name PAYMENT_TERMS
,NULL RELATED_INVOICE_NBR
,'Y' INVOICE_PRINT_FLAG
FROM ra_customer_trx_all ct
,ra_cust_trx_types_all ctt
,hz_cust_accounts rac_ship
,hz_cust_accounts rac_bill
,hz_parties rac_ship_party
,hz_locations raa_ship_loc
,hz_party_sites raa_ship_ps
,hz_cust_acct_sites_all raa_ship
,hz_cust_site_uses_all su_ship
,ra_customer_trx_lines_all rctl
,oe_order_lines_all ool
,oe_order_headers_all ooh
,mtl_parameters mp
,ra_terms rt
,OE_ORDER_SOURCES oos
,XLA_AR_INV_AEL_SL_V XLA_AEL_SL_V
WHERE ct.cust_trx_type_id = ctt.cust_trx_type_id
AND ctt.TYPE <> 'BR'
AND ct.org_id = ctt.org_id
AND ct.ship_to_customer_id = rac_ship.cust_account_id
AND ct.bill_to_customer_id = rac_bill.cust_account_id
AND rac_ship.party_id = rac_ship_party.party_id
AND su_ship.cust_acct_site_id = raa_ship.cust_acct_site_id
AND raa_ship.party_site_id = raa_ship_ps.party_site_id
AND raa_ship_loc.location_id = raa_ship_ps.location_id
AND ct.ship_to_site_use_id = su_ship.site_use_id
AND su_ship.org_id = ct.org_id
AND raa_ship.org_id = ct.org_id
AND ct.customer_trx_id = rctl.customer_trx_id
AND ct.org_id = rctl.org_id
AND rctl.interface_line_attribute6 = to_char(ool.line_id)
AND rctl.org_id = ool.org_id
AND ool.header_id = ooh.header_id
AND ool.org_id = ooh.org_id
AND mp.organization_id = ool.ship_from_org_id
AND ooh.payment_term_id = rt.term_id
AND xla_ael_sl_v.last_update_date >= NVL(p_last_update_date,xla_ael_sl_v.last_update_date)
AND ooh.order_source_id = oos.order_source_id --Change based on testing on 19-May-2010
AND oos.name = 'FASTRAQ' --Change based on testing on 19-May-2010
AND ooh.org_id = g_org_id --Change based on testing on 19-May-2010
AND ool.flow_status_code = 'CLOSED'
AND xla_ael_sl_v.trx_hdr_id = ct.customer_trx_id
AND trx_hdr_table = 'CT'
AND xla_ael_sl_v.gl_transfer_status = 'Y'
AND xla_ael_sl_v.accounted_dr IS NOT NULL
AND xla_ael_sl_v.org_id = ct.org_id;
-- AND ct.trx_number = '2000080';
}Hello Friend,
You query will definitely take more time or even fail in PROD,becuase the way it is written. Here are my few observations, may be it can help :-
1. XLA_AR_INV_AEL_SL_V XLA_AEL_SL_V : Never use a view inside such a long query , becuase View is just a window to the records.
and when used to join other table records, then all those tables which are used to create a view also becomes part of joining conition.
First of all please check if you really need this view. I guess you are using to check if the records have been created as Journal entries or not ?
Please check the possbility of finding it through other AR tables.
2. Remove _ALL tables instead use the corresponding org specific views (if you are in 11i ) or the sysnonymns ( in R12 )
For example : For ra_cust_trx_types_all use ra_cust_trx_types.
This will ensure that the query will execute only for those ORG_IDs which are assigned to that responsibility.
3. Check with the DBA whether the GATHER SCHEMA STATS have been run atleast for ONT and RA tables.
You can also check the same using
SELECT LAST_ANALYZED FROM ALL_TABLES WHERE TABLE_NAME = 'ra_customer_trx_all'.
If the tables are not analyzed , the CBO will not be able to tune your query.
4. Try to remove the DISTINCT keyword. This is the MAJOR reason for this problem.
5. If its a report , try to separate the logic in separate queries ( using a procedure ) and then populate the whole data in custom table, and use this custom table for generating the
report.
Thanks,
Neeraj Shrivastava
[email protected]
Edited by: user9352949 on Oct 1, 2010 8:02 PM
Edited by: user9352949 on Oct 1, 2010 8:03 PM -
Hi All,
I have cloned KSB1 tcode to custom one as required by business.
Below query takes more time than excepted.
Here V_DB_TABLE = COVP.
Values in Where clause are as follows
OBNJR in ( KSBB010000001224 BT KSBB012157221571)
GJAHR in blank
VERSN in '000'
WRTTP in '04' and '11'
all others are blank
VT_VAR_COND = ( CPUDT BETWEEN '20091201' and '20091208' )
SELECT (VT_FIELDS) INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF GS_COVP_EXT
FROM (V_DB_TABLE)
WHERE LEDNR = '00'
AND OBJNR IN LR_OBJNR
AND GJAHR IN GR_GJAHR
AND VERSN IN GR_VERSN
AND WRTTP IN GR_WRTTP
AND KSTAR IN LR_KSTAR
AND PERIO IN GR_PERIO
AND BUDAT IN GR_BUDAT
AND PAROB IN GR_PAROB
AND (VT_VAR_COND).
Checked in table for this condition it has only 92 entries.
But when i execute program takes long time as 3 Hrs.
Could any one help me on this>1.Dont use SELECT/ENDSELECT instead use INTO TABLE addition .
> 2.Avoid using corresponding addition.create a type and reference it.
> If the select is going for dump beacause of storage limitations ,then use Cursors.
you got three large NOs .... all three recommendations are wrong!
The SE16 test is going in the right direction ... but what was filled. Nobody knows!!!!
Select options:
Did you ever try to trace the SE16? The generic statement has for every field an in-condition!
Without the information what was actually filled, nobody can say something there
are at least 2**n combinations possible!
Use ST05 for SE16 and check actual statement plus explain! -
Optimizing the query - which takes more time
Hi,
Am having a query which was returning the results pretty fast one week back but now the same query takes more time to respond, nothing much changed in the table data, what could be the problem. Am using IN in the where clause, whether that could be an issue? if so what is the best method of rewriting the query.
SELECT RI.RESOURCE_NAME,TR.MSISDN,MAX(TR.ADDRESS1_GOOGLE) KEEP(DENSE_RANK LAST ORDER BY TR.MSG_DATE_INFO) ADDRESS1_GOOGLE,
MAX(TR.TIME_STAMP) MSG_DATE_INFO FROM TRACKING_REPORT TR, RESOURCE_INFO RI
WHERE TR.MSISDN IN ( SELECT MSISDN FROM RESOURCE_INFO WHERE GROUP_ID ='4'
AND COM_ID='12') AND RI.MSISDN = TR.MSISDN
GROUP BY RI.RESOURCE_NAME,TR.MSISDN ORDER BY MSG_DATE_INFO DESCHi
i have followed this link http://www.lorentzcenter.nl/awcourse/oracle/server.920/a96533/sqltrace.htm in enabling the trace and found out the following trace output, can you explain the problem here and its remedial action pls.
SELECT RI.RESOURCE_NAME,TR.MSISDN,MAX(TR.ADDRESS1_GOOGLE) KEEP(DENSE_RANK
LAST ORDER BY TR.MSG_DATE_INFO) ADDRESS1_GOOGLE, MAX(TR.TIME_STAMP)
MSG_DATE_INFO
FROM
TRACKING_REPORT TR, RESOURCE_INFO RI WHERE RI.GROUP_ID ='426' AND
RI.COM_ID='122' AND RI.MSISDN = TR.MSISDN GROUP BY RI.RESOURCE_NAME,
TR.MSISDN
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.01 0.02 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 6 13.69 389.03 81747 280722 0 72
total 8 13.70 389.05 81747 280722 0 72
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer goal: CHOOSE
Parsing user id: 281
Rows Row Source Operation
72 SORT GROUP BY
276558 NESTED LOOPS
79 TABLE ACCESS FULL RESOURCE_INFO
276558 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TRACKING_REPORT
276558 INDEX RANGE SCAN TR_INDX_ON_MSISDN_TIME (object id 60507)
********************************************************************************and the plan_table output is
STATEMENT_ID TIMESTAMP REMARKS OPERATION OPTIONS OBJECT_NODE OBJECT_OWNER OBJECT_NAME OBJECT_INSTANCE OBJECT_TYPE OPTIMIZER SEARCH_COLUMNS ID PARENT_ID POSITION COST CARDINALITY BYTES OTHER_TAG PARTITION_START PARTITION_STOP PARTITION_ID OTHER DISTRIBUTION CPU_COST IO_COST TEMP_SPACE ACCESS_PREDICATES FILTER_PREDICATES
23-Mar-11 23:36:45 SELECT STATEMENT CHOOSE 0 115 115 1058 111090 115
23-Mar-11 23:36:45 SORT GROUP BY 1 0 1 115 1058 111090 115
23-Mar-11 23:36:45 NESTED LOOPS 2 1 1 9 4603 483315 9
23-Mar-11 23:36:45 TABLE ACCESS FULL BSNL_RTMS RESOURCE_INFO 2 ANALYZED 3 2 1 8 1 30 8 "RI"."GROUP_ID"=426 AND "RI"."COM_ID"='122'
23-Mar-11 23:36:45 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID BSNL_RTMS TRACKING_REPORT 1 ANALYZED 4 2 2 1 3293 246975 1
23-Mar-11 23:36:45 INDEX RANGE SCAN BSNL_RTMS TR_INDX_ON_MSISDN_TIME NON-UNIQUE 1 5 4 1 1 3293 1 "RI"."MSISDN"="TR"."MSISDN"
Maybe you are looking for
-
HT1277 can I delete emails from my IPhone and the server as well?
Can I delete emails from both my IPhone 5 and the server as well?
-
No Sound from Mac Pro, however, volume icon moves up and down
Hello, I was using my 12 month old Mac Pro last night and it worked fine with sound as normal. When I powered it up today there is no sound coming from my monitor, but the volume icon moves up and down when I press the keys? I've checked in the Prefe
-
Problem in alv fieldcat function
data: begin of it_mara occurs 100, matnr LIKE mara-matnr, ernam LIKE mara-ernam, ersda LIKE mara-ersda, mtart LIKE mara-mtart, end of it_mara. i am using the above mentioned int tab. the following function i
-
PI 7.0 to Pi 7.1 version conflict
Hi all.. I got the TPZ file. The TPZ file is from version PI 7.0 which i want to import in PI 7.1. Can anybody pls tell me will this create a proble after importing from 7.0 to 7.1? if yes , what are the technical changes i have to do in PI 7.1
-
My keyboard isn't working. Tried a PRAM restart but it did not restart. My computer makes noises when keys are pressed but they do not work.