Automatic events for COST/EVENT distribution rule

Hi,
We are using 11.5.10 in our organization and we are using the following distribution rules
a) WORK/WORK
b) WORK/EVENT
c) EVENT/EVENT
d) COST/EVENT
The COST/EVENT projects generates automatic event and that too these events are passed in functional currency.
a) Is there a way we can stop these automatic generation of events?
b) If not, is there a way we can make the system to generate events in Project Currency?
Thanks
ARS

Hi
By standard functionality system will not allow you to update the distribution rule of an active project. Here are three ideas to overcome the issue. Note those are not solutions that Oracle will give you, so be sure to test them carefully before implementing on real system.
Please note the COST formula is calculating: ITD actual costs/total Approved Cost Budget X Total approved Revenue Budget. The billing extension called COST has as setup the name of the budget types for revenue and costs. It is possible to update the names of the budget types on the billing extension setup form. You might try setting a special budget types names which you designated only for that calculation. Enter budget cost and revenue values that will force the system to always get a zero result, so it will not create any new automatic event from that billing extension.
Another option is to go on and modify the SQL code of the billing extension COST (some times named COST_TO_COST). By modifying the code you prevent it from generating new events.
Another option is to update the distribution rule (Revenue Method) of the individual projects from COST to EVENT or WORK. Such update cannot be done from the front end, but you could easily do it by direct update on the database table.
Dina

Similar Messages

  • Cost Centers and distribution rules

    I need to allocate costs to profit centers and would like to have the costs be allocated first to the department cost center then distributed to product profit center by %.
    Example:  An invoice is first allocated to the sales department, then the distribution rule will allocate the cost between 4 product lines (33 % chemical A, 33 % chemical b, 17 % chemical c and 17 % chemical d).
    How would I setup the profit centers, cost centers and distribution rule to accomplish the above task.
    Thank you,
    Wayne

    Hi Fred,
    I assume you using 8.81?
    1. Administration - General Settings - Cost Accounting : Tick "Use Multidimensions" option
    2. Financial - Cost Accounting - Dimensions : Tick "Dimension 1" and "Dimension 2".
    Give proper description to each dimension, in your case maybe "Department" to Dimension 1 and "Product" to Dimension 2
    3. Financial - Cost Accounting - Cost Centers : Create your intended cost centre, "Sales" cost centre with dimension "Department", "Chemical A" to "Chemical D" with dimension "Product"
    4. Financial - Cost Accounting - Distribution Rules :
    As for your intention to allocate the invoice to Sales Department, since you want to allocate it 100% to Sales Department, you don't need to create a distribution rules, since B1 will automatically create a distribution rule with 100% allocation for each cost centre you created.
    As for your production cost allocation, create a distribution rule with your code "DR-P01" as an example, choose dimension "Product", set the Total with "100". In the detail section, choose each cost centre (Chemical A to D), enter respective value and click "Add" button.

  • Distribution Rules in Journal Entries

    Currently, cost centres and distributions rules only apply to sales and expenditure type GL accounts.  Our client would like this to be extended to all types of GL accounts so as to include balance sheet accounts. 
    The reason for this is the client uses a job costing add on with SAP Business One.  The job costing module works with cost centres which translate into cost centres distribution rules in SAP.  The client wants to track these cost centres throughout the entire system, and especially the work in progress account which is a balance sheet account.
    Is there any plans for extending the cost centre distribution rules functionality to include balance sheet postings as well as profit and loss postings to allow for full reporting?
    Thanks,

    Hi,
    You may check and post it here: https://cw.sdn.sap.com/cw/community/ideas/sme/b1
    Thanks,
    Gordon

  • Functional Area derivation as obligatory checkbox in Cost Center distribution cycle?

    Dear All,
    We are using Cost of Sales accounting with FI-CO online integration. Derivation of Functional Area for Cost Center assessment cycles is an obligatory indicator. Nevertheless I may create Cos Center distribution cycles without this option (what affects FI-CO online integration). Can anybody explain a system logic behind it?
    Can I set Functional Area derivation as an obligatory checkbox for Cost Center distribution cycles too?
    Bartlomiej Seidel

    Hi,
    I have searched for any useful note, but without result so far. The point is that any new distribution or assessment cycle (cost centers) in our company must work with Functional Area derivation (than FI-CO online integration works correctly). With our current SAP setup I must select this indicator for every assessment cycle - it is obligatory. But is not obligatory for distribution cycles - and I don't know why?
    I would like to protect everybody from crating distribution cycles without FA derivation indicator (like it works now for assessment cycles).  How may I do it?
    Bart

  • Unable to get automatic event handling for OK button.

    Hello,
    I have created a form using creatobject. This form contains an edit control and Search, Cancel buttons. I have set the Search buttons UID to "1" so it can handle the Enter key hit event. Instead its caption changes to Update when i start typing in the edit control and it does not respond to the Enter key hit. Cancel happens when Esc is hit.
    My code looks like this -
    Dim oCreationParams As SAPbouiCOM.FormCreationParams
            oCreationParams = SBO_Application.CreateObject(SAPbouiCOM.BoCreatableObjectType.cot_FormCreationParams)
            oCreationParams.UniqueID = "MySearchForm"
            oCreationParams.BorderStyle = SAPbouiCOM.BoFormBorderStyle.fbs_Sizable
                    Dim oForm As SAPbouiCOM.Form = SBO_Application.Forms.AddEx(oCreationParams)
    oForm.Visible = True
    '// set the form properties
            oForm.Title = "Search Form"
            oForm.Left = 300
            oForm.ClientWidth = 500
            oForm.Top = 100
            oForm.ClientHeight = 240
            '// Adding Items to the form
            '// and setting their properties
            '// Adding an Ok button
            '// We get automatic event handling for
            '// the Ok and Cancel Buttons by setting
            '// their UIDs to 1 and 2 respectively
            oItem = oForm.Items.Add("1", SAPbouiCOM.BoFormItemTypes.it_BUTTON)
            oItem.Left = 5
            oItem.Width = 65
            oItem.Top = oForm.ClientHeight - 30
            oItem.Height = 19
            oButton = oItem.Specific
            oButton.Caption = "Search"
            '// Adding a Cancel button
            oItem = oForm.Items.Add("2", SAPbouiCOM.BoFormItemTypes.it_BUTTON)
            oItem.Left = 75
            oItem.Width = 65
            oItem.Top = oForm.ClientHeight - 30
            oItem.Height = 19
            oButton = oItem.Specific
            oButton.Caption = "Cancel"
    oItem = oForm.Items.Add("NUM", SAPbouiCOM.BoFormItemTypes.it_EDIT)
            oItem.Left = 105
            oItem.Width = 140
            oItem.Top = 20
            oItem.Height = 16
            Dim oEditText As SAPbouiCOM.EditText = oItem.Specific
    What changes do i have to make to get the enter key to work?
    Thanks for your help.
    Regards,
    Sheetal

    Hello Felipe,
    Thanks for pointing me to the correct direction.
    So on refering to the documentation i tried out a few things. But I am still missing something here.
    I made the following changes to my code -
    oForm.AutoManaged = True
    oForm.SupportedModes = 1 ' afm_Ok
    oItem = oForm.Items.Add("1", SAPbouiCOM.BoFormItemTypes.it_BUTTON)
            oItem.Left = 5
            oItem.Width = 65
            oItem.Top = oForm.ClientHeight - 30
            oItem.Height = 19
    oItem.SetAutoManagedAttribute(SAPbouiCOM.BoAutoManagedAttr.ama_Visible, 1, SAPbouiCOM.BoModeVisualBehavior.mvb_Default)
            oButton = oItem.Specific
            oButton.Caption = "OK"
    AND
    oForm.Mode = SAPbouiCOM.BoFormMode.fm_OK_MODE
    oItem = oForm.Items.Add("1", SAPbouiCOM.BoFormItemTypes.it_BUTTON)
            oItem.Left = 5
            oItem.Width = 65
            oItem.Top = oForm.ClientHeight - 30
            oItem.Height = 19
    oItem.AffectsFormMode = False
    I get the same behaviour OK button changes to update and enter key does not work.
    Could you please tell me find what is it that i am doing wrong?
    Regards,
    Sheetal

  • Itu00B4s possible to change the Distribution rules for a order type RM01 ??

    Hi Experts:
    I need to change the settlement rule which is automatic created at the moment  that you create a Cost colector (class order RM01) transaction KKF6N..
    but when I go into KKF6N transaction and I select the "change" option and after that I go into settlement rule screen, I can´t change the distribution rule.
    I would need to change the settlement type from "PER" value to "TOT" value.. It´is possible in this kind of Cost colectors??
    Thanks and regards!
    Manuel

    Hi,
       Please note that you will not be able to change manually the settlement rule for a cost collector. 
    When you save, the system creates a settlement rule for the product cost collector.
    The settlement rule for the product cost collector always specifies the distribution rule "100% to material" and the settlement type  is always PER (periodic).
    Also refer the note 388457 in which one of the paragraph it says "As of Release 4.5, a special settlement rule is generated when you create a product cost collector (with procedure 5: delivery value for product cost collector). You cannot subsequently change this settlement rule".
    regards
    Waman

  • Distribution rules and projects - automatic checks

    Hello,
    I haveve three issues/questions regarding distribution rules and projects:
    - Are we able to implement an automatic control which does not allow bookings without distribution rules? The
    control already exists for booking which we'll be entered manually. But for automatically generated postings
    is not always in place. For example by closing a production order when the appropriate distribution rule is
    missing in the BOM.
    - Additional for projects: Either the distribution rule which is defined in the project master data should be
    proposed automatically and/or only the defined distribution rule is allowed for any bookings. This is mainly
    necessary for invoices which are registered only in SAP and not in PM (for example sales commission invoices,
    transport costs etc.). There people often use distribution rules which are not suitable.
    Our understanding is that once a project is set-up with a distribution rule and an entry is posted against
    that item, the distribution rule can not be changed. Is this correct?
    With kind regards,
    Amine Z.

    Closed so I can open a new thread

  • Error _ Receiver missing for distribution rule 000

    Hello,
    When I do the settlement, I got the error message, " Receiver missing for distribution rule 000 ",
    How can I solve that ? Where I can check distributin rule ?
    thanks and regards
    Shubin

    Hi,
      Goto Settlement Profile check you have maintained the valid receiver "settlement optional" for the receiver you mentioned in the settlement rule.
    If that settings are in place. then goto IMG>PS>Costs>Automatic and periodic allocations>Settlement>Define settlement rule for network>Assign strategies and default rule for network types.
    in that check out whether you can mentioned default rule as '00' for the network types you are using, if yes change the same to 'PS1'.
    Rgds
    Sudhir Reddy

  • Changing the automatic Distribution Rule from Per to Full

    Hello SAPians,
    I have a scenario where the Customer is maintaining the Moving Average Price (I know this is not SAP suggested, I am in the process of convincing to move from moving avg to Std) for the Semi-finished goods and finished goods.
    It is Product Cost by Order scenario where Process Orders are using and the settlement rule to the Material and distribution rule is "Per" (Periodic). The main reason Customer had this Per was they would not be able to settle the Order once they settle it in full.
    But due to increased issues in month end atctivities due to thie 'Per' settlement (settlement of Process Orders not settling properly in the last month due to the failure of Batch jobs and other reasons). I want to suggest them to use Distribution Rule 'Full' instead of 'Per' because of the following advantages considering the above scenario.
    1. The 'Full' settlement can be settled if the Order is not in Teco or closed status any number of times as long as there is the Variance sitting on the Order.
    2. The 'Full' Distribution rule will not create issue if the variance is sitting on the Order in the closed period because when you do the settlement in the next period, system will allocate the variances from the last period to the Material Receiver in the current Period(I have not yet tested this scenario) and has not been. (Yeah I know there will be issue if the Material has been moved out of inventory before the settlement happens, they have another set up to update the Material prices manually by keeping the track of cost of Material).
    3. So the config change will be the Product cost by Order -> Manufacturing Order-> Define Cost-Accounting-Relevant Default Values for Order Typ --> change the Default rule from PP1 to PP2 'Process orders (periodic settlement)'
    Please let me know if what I am thinking is wrong based on this sceanrio and also please give me some more insight if I am missing any points.
    Thank you very much for your time!
    -Harter.

    Hi Balaji/Ajay,
    Could you please help me in understanding the effect of Variances if I change the Order type to FULL in this scenario (Moving Average price for Finished good Material)?
    I checked the configuration and the Variance is only Total Variance that is settling to FI and COPA.
    Also client is more concentrated on Variance accumulated per year and not per month.
    Let's say I have Order in Period 9 where the actual debits on the Order are $1000 and actual credits are $1200 where balance (variance) is $200 and suppose I missed the Period 9 settlement and I want to settle this Order in Period 10 where I had $100 variance in that Period 10
    Period         Variance on Order                Status
    9              $200                   missed
    10              $100                   not yet
    So now when I settle the Order in period 10 (with FULL as settlement type), it settles $300 instead of $100 variance. So if this is the case, if I look at the Variance data, yes the variance data is wrong but if I look at yearly perspective, it looks right but I think I am missing something here, right?
    Also what happens if the Order is open more than one year and the same scenario happens, the Variance will be posted to new year which is again issue, right?
    Am I in the right direction?
    Please advice.
    Thank you,
    -Harter.

  • Distribution cycle for cost centers

    Hi,
       I have created a distribution cycle for cost centers using SKF. I have even created document using KB31N. based on this document the sender  should have some amount after executing the distribution cycle, but here the sender value is completely distributed to recievers leading to incorrect results.
    Can any one help me solve this?
    Thanks,
    Sravanthi

    Hello
    Pls check the rule once again.
    You use allocation rules to determine how amounts and quantities are allocated between sender objects (sender values) and receiver objects (receiver tracing factor). The rules for the allocation types are made up of sender and receiver rules.
    Sender rules
    Determination of the sender values for the distribution/assessment can occur according to the following rules:
    Posted amounts
    Fixed amounts
    Fixed rates
    Receiver rules
    Determination of the sender values for the distribution/assessment can occur according to the following rules:
    Variable portions
    Fixed amounts
    Fixed percentages
    Fixed portions
    Reg
    assign points if useful

  • Distribution rules for Settlement Profile

    Hi
    I have setup a PM Orders which collect all the maintenance and running cost of vehicles (equipments).  I have assigned settlement Profile "Internal Order" with settlement rule "Mandatory for release".
    Now when I click settlement rule button in work order, there are two distribution rules PER and FUL both 100% and to same cost centre (which belongs to equipment).
    Is this normal to have two distribution rules? will it cause any issues? where can I go to setup distribution rule to just one e.g FUL 100 (just one line), if I have to.
    Thanks in Advance.

    hi..
    1. This is SAto creat two dis rule by default.
    2. This will not creat any problem in settlement.
    Basic concept is :
         A)  Maintenance Order settlement rule having 2 lines that is Per & Ful. Peroidic Settlement- in this settlement rule system settle whatever cost occurs upto today & suppose in future if you want to charge some more cost on the same Maint. Order then system will accept it. And when ful or Final settlement runs the rest of the cost will settle to the cost receiver.
         B) You need not to delete any line whether this is PER or FUL.Its depends upon the settlement job which is done manually or schedule batch job. Suppose you has created schedule batch job for PER and FUL both. And the schedule frequency of PER is weekly and schedule frequency of FUL is monthly.
    I think this will give you some light on this issue.
    kkumar

  • Automatic Event Fire on every entry in Input Field

    Dear All,
    Here i have a scenerio, I am using barcode reader application. After reading the barcode from barcode machine, , numeric value eg  '1234567890' is automatically displaying in my input field. After that I have to call my RFC according to every entry in that field.
    Mean to say as the value comes to the input field , automatically my next view should be called where i am displaying the detail of particular employee having I card of that barcode.
    So is there any possibility in Webdynpro Java to fire an event automatically on every entry?
    Kindly help me out.
    Thanks & Regards
    Nivedita

    Dear Monalisa,
    Thanks for your quick response (SDN was down so i could not reply back). But as i explained earlier, my application is not for mobile barcode reader. Its for normal Id card Barcodes. Mobile Barcode Reader requires 2 types of barcode reader equipments and link given by you is explaining that proccess only.
    Here I am able to read the data from barcode Reader. But after reading data i need to generate any automatic event. I dont want to use any submit button or Enter key action. I want that as the value comes to my input field ,automatically it should go to database. webynpro does not support Javascript as per my knowledge.
    Kindly suggest something.
    Thanks & Regards
    Nivedita

  • How to prevent iPhoto to make an automatic event when importing from Photo stream

    Hi everyone,
    My question is related to the Photo stream functionality in iPhoto.
    Is possible to prevent iPhoto from making an automatic event when I import a photo from Photo stream. It is really annoying because of the fact that I use "events" for keeping my important photo's together (as many of you do I asume). Ofcourse after importing I can just delete it from my event section but is there a way to prevent it?
    Thanks.

    No. Photostream creates an Event for each month.
    iPhoto has many other tools for managing and categorising your Photos.
    I use Events simply as big buckets of Photos: Spring 08, July - Nov 06 are typical Events in my Library. I use keywords and Smart Albums extensively. I title the pics broadly.
    I keyword on a
    Who
    What
    Where basis (The When is in the photos's Exif metadata). I also rate the pics on a 1 - 5 star basis.
    Using this system I can find pretty much find any pic in my 40k library in a couple of seconds.
    So, for example, I have a batch of pics titled 'Seattle 08' and a  typical keywording might include: John, Anne, Landscape, mountain, trees, snow. With a rating included it's so very easy to find the best pics we took at Mount Rainier.
    File -> New Smart Album
    set it to 'All"
    title contains Seattle
    keyword is mountain
    keyword is snow
    rating is 5 stars
    Or, want a chronological album of John from birth to today?
    New Smart Album
    Keyword is John
    Set the View options to Sort By Date Ascending
    Want only the best pics?
    add Rating is greater than 4 stars
    The best thing about this system is that it's dynamic. If I add 50 more pics of John  to the Library tomorrow, as I keyword and rate them they are added to the Smart Album.
    In the end, organisation is about finding the pics. The point is to make locating that pic or batch of pics findable fast. This system works for me.
    Regards
    TD

  • Got error "Enter distribution rule for Asset without a validity limit"

    Hi
    I need to make AUC settlement to GL account using t.code AIAB. I have maintained the settlement rule but when I click on check button I got message " Enter distribution rule for Asset without a validity limit". The error msg no. KD059.
    Thanks in advance.

    Please do the
    following. , instead of assigning cost center, assign fixed asset(any asset)
    Then go back and click on detach then create your normal rule again at the same
    line
    The rule is that AUC should have at least one settlements rule for fixed asset
    even if it not used

  • Custom Event Collection Rule Reports

    I have three event collection rules created to target specific event id's. Now I need to report on those events, but I am currently struggling on the best way to achieve the best result. The Event Analysis Report rolls up the count for hosts were the same
    event id is logged, which is unacceptable, I need to display all entries for each device I am currently targeting. Can anyone provide any insight into the best way to achieve this?

    Hi,
    You may check the article below regarding to Using SCOM To Count Logs and Produce Reports:
    http://blog.tyang.org/2012/04/27/using-scom-to-count-logs-and-produce-reports/
    Regards,
    Yan Li
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

Maybe you are looking for