AWR in-memory

Hi,
I am upgrading my certification from Oracle9i to Oracle10g. I am currently studying AWR and its structure.  A book that I am reading is saying, "The total size of the AWR memory area cannot exceed more than 5 percent of the share pool size"
I know that there is a parameter which use to set share pool size but I don't know how to set AWR memory area in the share pool or SGA. Is there any parameter for setting AWR memory area?
It would be great if anyone answer me, please.
Thanks.
Asif

Hi Asif,
Are you talking about size ASH buffers?
The minimum size for ASH in-memory buffer is 1 MB.
SQL> select nam.ksppinm NAME,val.KSPPSTVL VALUE from x$ksppi nam, x$ksppsv val where nam.indx = val.indx and nam.ksppinm like '%_ash_size%' order by 1;
NAME         VALUE
_ash_size    1048618
It is calculated as Max( Min ( No. of CPU * 2 M, 5% of SHARED_POOL_SIZE, 2% of  SGA_TARGET) ,1M) gives the value for ASH size. You can increase it to the desired size as well.
SQL> alter system set "_ash_size" = 10000000;
System altered.
SQL> select * from v$sgastat where name = 'ASH buffers';
POOL         NAME                            BYTES
shared pool  ASH buffers                  10000000
You also have a dynamic performance view v$ASH_INFO, which would provide more details.
Regards,
Suntrupth

Similar Messages

  • AWR Memory Advisors

    I have the following memory advisors from the AWR; I would like to know how to interpret these results?
    PGA Memory Advisory:
    "PGA Target Est (MB)","Size Factr","W/A MB Processed","Estd Extra    W/A MB Read/   Written to Disk ","Estd PGA Cache Hit %","Estd PGA Overalloc Count","Estd Time"
    "138","0.99","90,700.12","11,521.57","84.00","214","788.090,200"
    "326","0.15","90,700.12","18,015.29","86.00","94","937,669,120"

    Hi,
    These table function in a 'what-if' manner.
    If you would increase the shared_pool size with a factor 2 then what would happen to the e.g. the number of physical reads.
    Your output looks a bit strange to me however. It's either a very perfectly tuned system, or one that has no resources left.
    In our 11g db the SGA_TARGET_ADVICE looks e.g. like below. It has more deviation between the several size factor values:
    ESTD_DB_TIME ESTD_DB_TIME_FACTOR ESTD_PHYSICAL_READS   SGA_SIZE SGA_SIZE_FACTOR
         8988151                   1           789178493      13312               1
        11408661              1.2693          1282888558       4992            .375
        10053248              1.1185          1006360414       6656              .5
         9700014              1.0792           936518118       8320            .625
         9304536              1.0352           855311651       9984             .75
         9099608              1.0124           812301423      11648            .875
         8937822               .9944           781286708      14976           1.125
         8886590               .9887           769527949      16640            1.25
         8834460               .9829           758163778      18304           1.375
         8762557               .9749           745536922      19968             1.5
         8583693                .955           702132127      21632           1.625
         8568413               .9533           702132127      23296            1.75
         8567514               .9532           676483826      24960           1.875
         8567514               .9532           676483826      26624               2HTH
    FJFranken

  • ORA 04030 Out of process memory error

    Dear experts,
    I know there are multiple discussions around this error and I have been reading through most of them in the past one week or so, but looks like we are running out of options or are missing the color altogether. Ok, we are getting ORA-04030 - out of process memory while allocating....while one of our batch process runs in the night. It simply tries to insert/update to a table. Our installation is 11.2.0.1.0 with no RAC configuration and on 64-bit AIX having 6 cores, 12 CPUs and 16 GB memory.
    We have checked the Workarea_Size_Policy is set to be as Auto so Oracle decides how much memory to allocate to PGA automatically on run-time based on the demand. And based on the AWR report it doesnt look like we are anywhere near the country having a PGA-deficit!! I am attaching the AWR report in a word document here for your reference.
    Also attached below are the configurations and the ulimit values.
    IKBTRN1> show parameter workarea;
    NAME                                 TYPE                             VALUE
    workarea_size_policy                 string                           AUTO
    oraipeikbtrn1:/home/oracle-> ulimit -a
    time(seconds)        unlimited
    file(blocks)         unlimited
    data(kbytes)         unlimited
    stack(kbytes)        4194304
    memory(kbytes)       unlimited
    coredump(blocks)     unlimited
    nofiles(descriptors) unlimited
    threads(per process) unlimited
    processes(per user)  unlimited
    Now, nothing seems to have contributed to the out of process memory issue from Oracle standpoint. I would be happy to be proved wrong here, if I am wrong.
    So, whats going wrong here? A possible memory leak which we cannot zero down to, a OS memory limit or something else?
    Seeking expert's advise on this, and also sincerely appreciate your time in looking at this.
    Thanks.
    P.S - I am pasting the whole AWR report since there is no 'upload file' option here that I can see.
    WORKLOAD REPOSITORY report for
    DB Name     DB Id     Instance     Inst num     Startup Time     Release     RAC
    IKBTRN1     54659199     IKBTRN1     1     06-Jun-11 02:06     11.2.0.1.0     NO
    Host Name     Platform     CPUs     Cores     Sockets     Memory (GB)
    oraipeikbtrn1.******.com     AIX-Based Systems (64-bit)     12     6          16.00
         Snap Id     Snap Time     Sessions     Cursors/Session
    Begin Snap:     5952     26-Aug-11 03:00:48     34     2.0
    End Snap:     5953     26-Aug-11 04:00:52     32     1.9
    Elapsed:          60.07 (mins)          
    DB Time:          1.93 (mins)          
    Report Summary
    Cache Sizes
         Begin     End          
    Buffer Cache:     1,056M     704M     Std Block Size:     8K
    Shared Pool Size:     3,456M     3,456M     Log Buffer:     7,184K
    Load Profile
    Load Profile
         Per Second     Per Transaction     Per Exec     Per Call
    DB Time(s):     0.0     2.0     0.02     0.02
    DB CPU(s):     0.0     0.5     0.00     0.00
    Redo size:     556.1     34,554.8          
    Logical reads:     151.4     9,407.6          
    Block changes:     1.9     119.8          
    Physical reads:     14.2     882.6          
    Physical writes:     9.5     590.4          
    User calls:     1.8     112.8          
    Parses:     1.5     93.7          
    Hard parses:     0.1     8.9          
    W/A MB processed:     -0.1     -6.9          
    Logons:     0.0     1.6          
    Executes:     1.9     115.4          
    Rollbacks:     0.0     0.0          
    Transactions:     0.0               
    Instance Efficiency Percentages (Target 100%)
    Buffer Nowait %:     100.00     Redo NoWait %:     100.00
    Buffer Hit %:     96.63     In-memory Sort %:     99.97
    Library Hit %:     95.68     Soft Parse %:     90.49
    Execute to Parse %:     18.74     Latch Hit %:     100.00
    Parse CPU to Parse Elapsd %:     57.23     % Non-Parse CPU:     86.28
    Shared Pool Statistics
         Begin     End
    Memory Usage %:     85.72     85.76
    % SQL with executions>1:     93.91     96.66
    % Memory for SQL w/exec>1:     89.07     87.04
    Top 5 Timed Foreground Events
    Event     Waits     Time(s)     Avg wait (ms)     % DB time     Wait Class
    DB CPU          29          24.66     
    db file scattered read     3,456     17     5     14.92     User I/O
    db file sequential read     4,304     17     4     14.77     User I/O
    direct path read temp     764     17     22     14.31     User I/O
    direct path write temp     259     5     21     4.70     User I/O
    Host CPU (CPUs: 12 Cores: 6 Sockets: )
    Load Average Begin     Load Average End     %User     %System     %WIO     %Idle
    1.39     1.37     0.2     0.2     0.2     99.6
    Instance CPU
    %Total CPU     %Busy CPU     %DB time waiting for CPU (Resource Manager)
    0.1     20.5     0.0
    Memory Statistics
         Begin     End
    Host Mem (MB):     16,384.0     16,384.0
    SGA use (MB):     4,704.0     4,352.0
    PGA use (MB):     196.1     188.4
    % Host Mem used for SGA+PGA:     29.91     27.71
    Main Report
    •     Report Summary
    •     Wait Events Statistics
    •     SQL Statistics
    •     Instance Activity Statistics
    •     IO Stats
    •     Buffer Pool Statistics
    •     Advisory Statistics
    •     Wait Statistics
    •     Undo Statistics
    •     Latch Statistics
    •     Segment Statistics
    •     Dictionary Cache Statistics
    •     Library Cache Statistics
    •     Memory Statistics
    •     Streams Statistics
    •     Resource Limit Statistics
    •     Shared Server Statistics
    •     init.ora Parameters
    Back to Top
    Wait Events Statistics
    •     Time Model Statistics
    •     Operating System Statistics
    •     Operating System Statistics - Detail
    •     Foreground Wait Class
    •     Foreground Wait Events
    •     Background Wait Events
    •     Wait Event Histogram
    •     Wait Event Histogram Detail (64 msec to 2 sec)
    •     Wait Event Histogram Detail (4 sec to 2 min)
    •     Wait Event Histogram Detail (4 min to 1 hr)
    •     Service Statistics
    •     Service Wait Class Stats
    Back to Top
    Time Model Statistics
    •     Total time in database user-calls (DB Time): 115.9s
    •     Statistics including the word "background" measure background process time, and so do not contribute to the DB time statistic
    •     Ordered by % or DB time desc, Statistic name
    Statistic Name     Time (s)     % of DB Time
    sql execute elapsed time     101.69     87.75
    DB CPU     28.58     24.66
    parse time elapsed     10.14     8.75
    hard parse elapsed time     9.92     8.56
    failed parse elapsed time     4.92     4.25
    hard parse (sharing criteria) elapsed time     4.27     3.68
    connection management call elapsed time     0.42     0.36
    PL/SQL compilation elapsed time     0.34     0.30
    PL/SQL execution elapsed time     0.18     0.15
    sequence load elapsed time     0.00     0.00
    repeated bind elapsed time     0.00     0.00
    DB time     115.88     
    background elapsed time     86.01     
    background cpu time     5.06     
    Back to Wait Events Statistics
    Back to Top
    Operating System Statistics
    •     *TIME statistic values are diffed. All others display actual values. End Value is displayed if different
    •     ordered by statistic type (CPU Use, Virtual Memory, Hardware Config), Name
    Statistic     Value     End Value
    NUM_LCPUS     0     
    NUM_VCPUS     0     
    AVG_BUSY_TIME     1,260     
    AVG_IDLE_TIME     360,705     
    AVG_IOWAIT_TIME     534     
    AVG_SYS_TIME     483     
    AVG_USER_TIME     679     
    BUSY_TIME     16,405     
    IDLE_TIME     4,329,811     
    IOWAIT_TIME     7,284     
    SYS_TIME     7,092     
    USER_TIME     9,313     
    LOAD     1     1
    OS_CPU_WAIT_TIME     503,900     
    PHYSICAL_MEMORY_BYTES     17,179,869,184     
    NUM_CPUS     12     
    NUM_CPU_CORES     6     
    GLOBAL_RECEIVE_SIZE_MAX     1,310,720     
    GLOBAL_SEND_SIZE_MAX     1,310,720     
    TCP_RECEIVE_SIZE_DEFAULT     16,384     
    TCP_RECEIVE_SIZE_MAX     9,223,372,036,854,775,807     
    TCP_RECEIVE_SIZE_MIN     4,096     
    TCP_SEND_SIZE_DEFAULT     16,384     
    TCP_SEND_SIZE_MAX     9,223,372,036,854,775,807     
    TCP_SEND_SIZE_MIN     4,096     
    Back to Wait Events Statistics
    Back to Top
    Operating System Statistics - Detail
    Snap Time     Load     %busy     %user     %sys     %idle     %iowait
    26-Aug 03:00:48     1.39                         
    26-Aug 04:00:52     1.37     0.38     0.21     0.16     99.62     0.17
    Back to Wait Events Statistics
    Back to Top
    Foreground Wait Class
    •     s - second, ms - millisecond - 1000th of a second
    •     ordered by wait time desc, waits desc
    •     %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
    •     Captured Time accounts for 78.2% of Total DB time 115.88 (s)
    •     Total FG Wait Time: 62.08 (s) DB CPU time: 28.58 (s)
    Wait Class     Waits     %Time -outs     Total Wait Time (s)     Avg wait (ms)     %DB time
    User I/O     8,949     0     56     6     48.74
    DB CPU               29          24.66
    System I/O     1,916     0     3     1     2.18
    Other     506     88     1     2     0.92
    Configuration     2     50     1     500     0.86
    Commit     37     0     1     18     0.56
    Application     20     0     0     17     0.29
    Network     4,792     0     0     0     0.01
    Concurrency     1     0     0     0     0.00
    Back to Wait Events Statistics
    Back to Top
    Foreground Wait Events
    •     s - second, ms - millisecond - 1000th of a second
    •     Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
    •     ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
    •     %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
    Event     Waits     %Time -outs     Total Wait Time (s)     Avg wait (ms)     Waits /txn     % DB time
    db file scattered read     3,456     0     17     5     59.59     14.92
    db file sequential read     4,304     0     17     4     74.21     14.77
    direct path read temp     764     0     17     22     13.17     14.31
    direct path write temp     259     0     5     21     4.47     4.70
    control file sequential read     1,916     0     3     1     33.03     2.18
    ADR block file read     38     0     1     28     0.66     0.92
    log buffer space     2     50     1     500     0.03     0.86
    log file sync     37     0     1     18     0.64     0.56
    enq: RO - fast object reuse     14     0     0     24     0.24     0.29
    local write wait     44     0     0     1     0.76     0.03
    SQL*Net message to client     4,772     0     0     0     82.28     0.01
    Disk file operations I/O     110     0     0     0     1.90     0.00
    ADR block file write     7     0     0     0     0.12     0.00
    SQL*Net message from client     4,773     0     15,396     3226     82.29     
    Streams AQ: waiting for messages in the queue     720     100     3,600     5000     12.41     
    Back to Wait Events Statistics
    Back to Top
    Background Wait Events
    •     ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
    •     Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
    •     %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
    Event     Waits     %Time -outs     Total Wait Time (s)     Avg wait (ms)     Waits /txn     % bg time
    control file sequential read     4,950     0     35     7     85.34     40.74
    control file parallel write     1,262     0     31     25     21.76     36.46
    log file parallel write     383     0     4     10     6.60     4.37
    db file parallel write     627     0     2     3     10.81     2.36
    change tracking file synchronous read     56     0     2     34     0.97     2.21
    os thread startup     17     0     1     88     0.29     1.74
    ADR block file read     135     0     1     7     2.33     1.04
    change tracking file synchronous write     56     0     1     15     0.97     0.98
    SGA: allocation forcing component growth     8     100     1     100     0.14     0.93
    db file sequential read     112     0     1     6     1.93     0.75
    process diagnostic dump     94     0     0     1     1.62     0.09
    ADR block file write     92     0     0     1     1.59     0.07
    LGWR wait for redo copy     11     0     0     1     0.19     0.01
    log file sync     2     0     0     3     0.03     0.01
    ADR file lock     92     22     0     0     1.59     0.01
    Parameter File I/O     24     0     0     0     0.41     0.01
    direct path write     6     0     0     1     0.10     0.00
    Disk file operations I/O     54     0     0     0     0.93     0.00
    rdbms ipc message     17,637     97     61,836     3506     304.09     
    Streams AQ: waiting for time management or cleanup tasks     5     60     11,053     2210602     0.09     
    DIAG idle wait     7,203     100     7,203     1000     124.19     
    PX Idle Wait     1,802     100     3,604     2000     31.07     
    pmon timer     1,212     99     3,603     2973     20.90     
    Space Manager: slave idle wait     726     99     3,603     4963     12.52     
    smon timer     12     100     3,600     300004     0.21     
    Streams AQ: qmn slave idle wait     128     0     3,583     27993     2.21     
    Streams AQ: qmn coordinator idle wait     256     50     3,583     13996     4.41     
    SQL*Net message from client     293     0     2     5     5.05     
    Back to Wait Events Statistics
    Back to Top
    Wait Event Histogram
    •     Units for Total Waits column: K is 1000, M is 1000000, G is 1000000000
    •     % of Waits: value of .0 indicates value was <.05%; value of null is truly 0
    •     % of Waits: column heading of <=1s is truly <1024ms, >1s is truly >=1024ms
    •     Ordered by Event (idle events last)
              % of Waits
    Event     Total Waits     <1ms     <2ms     <4ms     <8ms     <16ms     <32ms     <=1s     >1s
    ADR block file read     173     80.3     5.2     2.3     5.8     1.7          4.6     
    ADR block file write     99     96.0     3.0                    1.0          
    ADR file lock     102     100.0                                   
    Disk file operations I/O     165     100.0                                   
    LGWR wait for redo copy     11     90.9               9.1                    
    Parameter File I/O     24     100.0                                   
    SGA: allocation forcing component growth     8                                   100.0     
    SQL*Net break/reset to client     6     100.0                                   
    SQL*Net message to client     4992     100.0                                   
    SQL*Net more data from client     20     100.0                                   
    asynch descriptor resize     541     100.0                                   
    change tracking file synchronous read     56     83.9                         1.8     14.3     
    change tracking file synchronous write     56     80.4     7.1               1.8          10.7     
    control file parallel write     1262     80.3     1.7     .6     .6     .8     1.3     14.7     
    control file sequential read     6866     94.1     .9     .7     .7     .3     .4     2.9     
    db file parallel write     628     94.3     2.1     1.0     .8     .3     .3     1.3     
    db file scattered read     3457     72.6     7.2     5.4     6.9     5.7     .5     1.6     
    db file sequential read     4525     78.7     2.7     1.8     9.6     5.3     .4     1.5     
    direct path read temp     764     40.2     18.6     9.4     6.2     11.0     5.8     8.9     
    direct path sync     1     100.0                                   
    direct path write     6     83.3     16.7                              
    direct path write temp     259     .4          1.2     88.8          .4     9.3     
    enq: RO - fast object reuse     14     42.9     42.9          7.1               7.1     
    latch free     1     100.0                                   
    latch: cache buffers lru chain     2     100.0                                   
    latch: checkpoint queue latch     2     100.0                                   
    latch: messages     2     100.0                                   
    latch: object queue header operation     2     100.0                                   
    latch: redo allocation     1     100.0                                   
    latch: row cache objects     1     100.0                                   
    local write wait     44     100.0                                   
    log buffer space     2     50.0                              50.0     
    log file parallel write     383     92.4     .8          1.0               5.7     
    log file sync     39     82.1     2.6          2.6               12.8     
    os thread startup     17                                   100.0     
    process diagnostic dump     94     34.0     63.8     2.1                         
    reliable message     7     100.0                                   
    utl_file I/O     12     100.0                                   
    DIAG idle wait     7204                                   100.0     
    PX Idle Wait     1802                                        100.0
    SQL*Net message from client     5067     87.1     6.6     1.0     .5     .5     .1     .5     3.7
    Space Manager: slave idle wait     726     .6                                   99.4
    Streams AQ: qmn coordinator idle wait     256     49.2     .8                              50.0
    Streams AQ: qmn slave idle wait     128                                        100.0
    Streams AQ: waiting for messages in the queue     721                                        100.0
    Streams AQ: waiting for time management or cleanup tasks     5     40.0                              20.0     40.0
    class slave wait     17     100.0                                   
    pmon timer     1212     .9                                   99.1
    rdbms ipc message     17.6K     1.8     .4     .2     .2     .1     .1     21.0     76.2
    smon timer     12                                        100.0
    Back to Wait Events Statistics
    Back to Top
    I couldnt add the rest of the report here since it is telling me I have exceeded 30000 characters. If you want to see the full report, please email me at [email protected]

    Unless your database is strictly a DSS-type of database, your AWR report exposes loads of issues with it. And I think none of the time during the AWR window was spent on database. Look at the DB time (with all those multi cores) compared with the elapsed time of the AWR.
    As you are on 11g, why not make use of MEMORY_TARGET (a single parameter to manage both SGA and PGA)? If you are already on it, ignore this as I can't see it anywhere. If not, get rid of SGA_TARGET and PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET and replace it with a single MEMORY_TARGET parameter. However you may have a minimum threshold set for different SGA pools so that they won't shrink beyond that point.
    Having said that, setting MEMORY_TARGET is not a guarantee to avoid ORA-4030. Just a single bad PL/SQL code could go and exploit the untunable part of your process memory and even go and blow up the physical memory. If you are using FORALL and BULK load, see if you can cut it down into few chunks rather than running as a single process.
    What does your V$PGASTAT say?

  • AWR Report - no data!!

    Oracle Version: 11.1.0.7 64x
    OS Version: Windows 2008 Server 64x
    Hi There,
    We're just trying to generate a awr report for one of our databases and the report is coming out with no data.
    statistics_level parameter is set to "TYPICAL"; any idea to what's going on please?
    Thanks
    SQL>
    SQL> @?/rdbms/admin/awrrpt.sql
    Current Instance
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
       DB Id    DB Name      Inst Num Instance
    1391811405 WEBTST              1 webtst
    Specify the Report Type
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Would you like an HTML report, or a plain text report?
    Enter 'html' for an HTML report, or 'text' for plain text
    Defaults to 'html'
    Enter value for report_type: text
    Type Specified:  text
    Instances in this Workload Repository schema
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
       DB Id     Inst Num DB Name      Instance     Host
    * 1391811405        1 WEBTST       webtst       WEBDBTST
    Using 1391811405 for database Id
    Using          1 for instance number
    Specify the number of days of snapshots to choose from
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Entering the number of days (n) will result in the most recent
    (n) days of snapshots being listed.  Pressing <return> without
    specifying a number lists all completed snapshots.
    Enter value for num_days: 1
    Listing the last day's Completed Snapshots
                                                            Snap
    Instance     DB Name        Snap Id    Snap Started    Level
    webtst       WEBTST           43973 12 May 2011 00:00      1
                                  43974 12 May 2011 01:00      1
                                  43975 12 May 2011 02:00      1
                                  43976 12 May 2011 03:00      1
                                  43977 12 May 2011 04:00      1
                                  43978 12 May 2011 05:00      1
                                  43979 12 May 2011 06:00      1
                                  43980 12 May 2011 07:00      1
                                  43981 12 May 2011 08:00      1
                                  43982 12 May 2011 09:00      1
                                  43983 12 May 2011 10:00      1
                                  43984 12 May 2011 11:00      1
                                  43985 12 May 2011 11:02      1
    Specify the Begin and End Snapshot Ids
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Enter value for begin_snap: 43984
    Begin Snapshot Id specified: 43984
    Enter value for end_snap: 43985
    End   Snapshot Id specified: 43985
    Specify the Report Name
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    The default report file name is awrrpt_1_43984_43985.txt.  To use this name,
    press <return> to continue, otherwise enter an alternative.
    Enter value for report_name:
    Using the report name awrrpt_1_43984_43985.txt
    WARNING (-20023)
    ORA-20023: Missing start and end values for time model stat: parse time elapsed
    WARNING (-20023)
    ORA-20023: Missing start and end values for time model stat: DB CPU
    WARNING (-20016)
    ORA-20016: Missing value for SGASTAT: free memory
    WARNING (-20016)
    ORA-20016: Missing value for SGASTAT: free memory
    WARNING (-20009)
    ORA-20009: Missing System Statistic logons current
    WARNING (-20009)
    ORA-20009: Missing System Statistic logons current
    WARNING (-20009)
    ORA-20009: Missing System Statistic opened cursors current
    WARNING (-20009)
    ORA-20009: Missing System Statistic opened cursors current
    WARNING (-20023)
    ORA-20023: Missing start and end values for time model stat: sql execute elapsed
    WARNING (-20008)
    ORA-20008: Missing Init.ora parameter undo_management
    WARNING (-20008)
    ORA-20008: Missing Init.ora parameter db_block_size
    WARNING (-20016)
    ORA-20016: Missing value for SGASTAT: log_buffer
    WARNING (-20023)
    ORA-20023: Missing start and end values for time model stat: DB time
    WARNING (-20008)
    ORA-20008: Missing Init.ora parameter timed_statistics
    WARNING (-20008)
    ORA-20008: Missing Init.ora parameter timed_statistics
    WARNING (-20008)
    ORA-20008: Missing Init.ora parameter statistics_level
    WARNING (-20008)
    ORA-20008: Missing Init.ora parameter statistics_level
    WARNING (-20008)
    ORA-20008: Missing Init.ora parameter sga_target
    WARNING (-20008)
    ORA-20008: Missing Init.ora parameter pga_aggregate_target
    WARNING (-20023)
    ORA-20023: Missing start and end values for time model stat: background cpu time
    WARNING (-20023)
    ORA-20023: Missing start and end values for time model stat: background elapsed
    WARNING (-20023)
    ORA-20023: Missing start and end values for time model stat: connection manageme
    WARNING (-20016)
    ORA-20016: Missing value for SGASTAT: buffer_cache
    WARNING (-20016)
    ORA-20016: Missing value for SGASTAT: buffer_cache
    WARNING: Since the DB Time is less than one second, there was
             minimal foreground activity in the snapshot period.
             Some of the percentage values will be invalid.
    WORKLOAD REPOSITORY report for
    DB Name         DB Id    Instance     Inst Num Startup Time    Release     RAC
    WEBTST        1391811405 webtst              1 29-Apr-11 04:50 11.1.0.7.0  NO
    Host Name        Platform                         CPUs Cores Sockets Memory(GB)
    WEBDBTST         Microsoft Windows x86 64-bit                           .00
                  Snap Id      Snap Time      Sessions Curs/Sess
    Begin Snap:     43984 12-May-11 11:00:01
      End Snap:     43985 12-May-11 11:02:00
       Elapsed:                1.98 (mins)
       DB Time:                0.00 (mins)
    Cache Sizes                       Begin        End
    ~~~~~~~~~~~                  ---------- ----------
                   Buffer Cache:MM  Std Block Size:K
               Shared Pool Size:         0M         0M      Log Buffer:K
    ORA-01403: no data found
    Error encountered in Report Summary
    Continuing to Report Sections
    Time Model Statistics              DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Operating System Statistics         DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Operating System Statistics - DetailDB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Foreground Wait Class               DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
    -> s  - second, ms - millisecond -    1000th of a second
    -> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc
    -> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%.  Value of null is truly 0
    -> Captured Time accounts for %  of Total DB time            .00 (s)
    -> Total FG Wait Time:    (s)  DB CPU time:            .00 (s)
                                                                      Avg
                                          %Time       Total Wait     wait
    Wait Class                      Waits -outs         Time (s)     (ms)  %DB time
    DB CPU                                                     0              100.0
    Foreground Wait Events             DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Background Wait Events             DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Wait Event Histogram               DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Service Statistics                 DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Service Wait Class Stats            DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    SQL ordered by Elapsed Time        DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    SQL ordered by CPU Time            DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    SQL ordered by Gets                DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    SQL ordered by Reads               DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    SQL ordered by Executions          DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    SQL ordered by Parse Calls         DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    SQL ordered by Sharable Memory     DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    SQL ordered by Version Count       DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Instance Activity Stats            DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Instance Activity Stats - Absolute ValuesDB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Instance Activity Stats - Thread ActivityDB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Tablespace IO Stats                DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    File IO Stats                      DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Buffer Pool Statistics             DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Instance Recovery Stats             DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Buffer Pool Advisory                       DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snap: 43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    PGA Aggr Summary                   DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    PGA Aggr Target Stats               DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    PGA Aggr Target Histogram           DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    PGA Memory Advisory                        DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snap: 43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Shared Pool Advisory                      DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snap: 43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    SGA Target Advisory                        DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snap: 43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Streams Pool Advisory                      DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snap: 43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Java Pool Advisory                         DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snap: 43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Buffer Wait Statistics              DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Enqueue Activity                   DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Undo Segment Summary               DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Undo Segment Stats                  DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Latch Activity                     DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Latch Sleep Breakdown              DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Latch Miss Sources                 DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Mutex Sleep Summary                 DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Parent Latch Statistics            DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Child Latch Statistics              DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Segments by Row Lock Waits         DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Segments by ITL Waits               DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Segments by Buffer Busy Waits       DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Dictionary Cache Stats             DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Library Cache Activity              DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Memory Dynamic Components          DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Memory Resize Operations Summary    DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Memory Resize Ops                   DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Process Memory Summary             DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    sum
    SGA breakdown difference            DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Streams CPU/IO Usage               DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Streams Capture                     DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Streams Apply                       DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Buffered Queues                     DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Buffered Subscribers                DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Rule Set                            DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Persistent Queues                   DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Persistent Subscribers              DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    Resource Limit Stats                      DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snap: 43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    init.ora Parameters                DB/Inst: WEBTST/webtst  Snaps: 43984-43985
                      No data exists for this section of the report.
    End of Report

    SQL> show parameter statistics
    NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
    optimizer_use_pending_statistics     boolean     FALSE
    statistics_level                     string      TYPICAL
    timed_os_statistics                  integer     0
    timed_statistics                     boolean     TRUE
    SQL>
    SQL> SELECT statistics_name,
      2             session_status,
      3             system_status,
      4             activation_level,
      5             session_settable
      6      FROM   v$statistics_level
      7      ORDER BY statistics_name;
    STATISTICS_NAME                                                  SESSION_ SYSTEM_S ACTIVAT SES
    Active Session History                                           ENABLED  ENABLED  TYPICAL NO
    Adaptive Thresholds Enabled                                      ENABLED  ENABLED  TYPICAL NO
    Automated Maintenance Tasks                                      ENABLED  ENABLED  TYPICAL NO
    Bind Data Capture                                                ENABLED  ENABLED  TYPICAL NO
    Buffer Cache Advice                                              ENABLED  ENABLED  TYPICAL NO
    Global Cache Statistics                                          ENABLED  ENABLED  TYPICAL NO
    Longops Statistics                                               ENABLED  ENABLED  TYPICAL NO
    MTTR Advice                                                      DISABLED DISABLED TYPICAL NO
    Modification Monitoring                                          ENABLED  ENABLED  TYPICAL NO
    PGA Advice                                                       ENABLED  ENABLED  TYPICAL NO
    Plan Execution Sampling                                          ENABLED  ENABLED  TYPICAL YES
    Plan Execution Statistics                                        DISABLED DISABLED ALL     YES
    SQL Monitoring                                                   ENABLED  ENABLED  TYPICAL YES
    Segment Level Statistics                                         ENABLED  ENABLED  TYPICAL NO
    Shared Pool Advice                                               ENABLED  ENABLED  TYPICAL NO
    Streams Pool Advice                                              ENABLED  ENABLED  TYPICAL NO
    Threshold-based Alerts                                           ENABLED  ENABLED  TYPICAL NO
    Time Model Events                                                ENABLED  ENABLED  TYPICAL YES
    Timed OS Statistics                                              DISABLED DISABLED ALL     YES
    Timed Statistics                                                 ENABLED  ENABLED  TYPICAL YES
    Ultrafast Latch Statistics                                       ENABLED  ENABLED  TYPICAL NO
    Undo Advisor, Alerts and Fast Ramp up                            ENABLED  ENABLED  TYPICAL NO
    V$IOSTAT_* statistics                                            ENABLED  ENABLED  TYPICAL NO
    23 rows selected.
    SQL>Thanks
    Edited by: rsar001 on May 12, 2011 11:33 AM

  • Awr questions

    Hi,
    I have some questions related to AWR:
    1) In AWR there is a section on "SQL ordered by Sharable Memory" . I am not clear what is the meaning of sqls ordered by sharable memory? and and how that information could be used for a tuning oppertunity?
    2) in the SQL Statistics section of AWR, several sqls are listed under each group (e.g. for sqls ordered by elapsed time, ordered by cpu time etc). Is there a rule that how many sqls will be listed there? I mean say under teh sqls ordered by elapse time category how many sql statements will be listed? In one AWR report I found 16 statements under this category. Now in same AWR report, under "SQL ordered by Reads" category I found 10 statements listed (not 16). So what is the rule? How many statements will be listed by Oracle in the AWR for each of the category?
    3) Under "instance activity" section lots of stats are given. Are these stats cumulative since the database startup or they are for the snapshot period for which the AWR report is taken? -I think that the stats should be for the snapshot period, not cumulative but want to confirm if my understanding is correct.
    Thanks

    What i belive about the query tuning i always start from using Bind Variables.
    But if your query is very resource intensive try writing the query in some other manner .
    Is your query is using view also if yes check the view if it is meargable or non mergable.
    Try to investigate your execution plan for the query and. tune it.
    As far as a full table scan is concerned it depends on the selectivity part of your sql query
    if the sql is returning high numbers of rows then . it is optimal way to do the operation by
    a full table scan.
    the best way to tune your sql is to generate the plan output from the trace file of the session
    by using the tkprof utility.
    sql> alter session set sql_trace=true;
    sql>------------do your work...
    sql> alter session set sql_trace=false;
    then a trace file will be generated in to your udump folder...
    which can be analysed for getting the sql execution plan which oracle used
    to solve the result.....
    Try it if you find some difficulty let me know...
    i will help you.
    Bi Tc

  • How to comment my SQL in PL/SQL so that the comment carries to AWR?

    Is there anything about using comments as in /* some comment */ in a SQL statement in a PL SQL procedure and expecting that to be carried thru to AWR?
    Right now it seems my comments are not visible in the AWR history. I'm wondering if they are compiled out when they are in PL/SQL blocks or not?
    Is there a way to preserve them such that they remain without using dynamic sql?

    steffi wrote:
    Is there anything about using comments as in /* some comment */ in a SQL statement in a PL SQL procedure and expecting that to be carried thru to AWR?Comments are stripped from (static) SQL code written in PL/SQL, unless that comment is a CBO hint.
    It is a "+Good Thing+" as it reduces the memory footprint of the cursor in the shared pool. It also ensures a greater potential degree of cursor sharing as the very same SQL statement with different comments will wind up as a single re-usable cursor.
    Why exactly do you want to see comments in SQL cursors in AWR reports? This is just a high level overview - not sure what enlightenment SQL comments will bring.

  • High library cache load lock waits in AWR

    Hi All,
    Today i faced a significant performance problem related to shared pool. I made some observations, thought it would be a nice idea to share them with Oracle experts. Please feel free to add your observations/recommendations and correct me where i am wrong.
    Here are the excerpts from AWR report created for the problem timing. Database server is on 10.2.0.3 and running with 2*16 configuration. DB cache size is 4,000M and shared pool size is of 3008M.
    Snap Id Snap Time Sessions Cursors/Session
    Begin Snap: 9994 29-Jun-09 10:00:07 672 66.3
    End Snap: 10001 29-Jun-09 17:00:49 651 64.4
    Elapsed:   420.70 (mins)    
    DB Time:   4,045.34 (mins)   -- Very poor response time visible from difference between DB time and elapsed time.
    Load Profile
    Per Second Per Transaction
    Redo size: 248,954.70 23,511.82
    Logical reads: 116,107.04 10,965.40
    Block changes: 1,357.13 128.17
    Physical reads: 125.49 11.85
    Physical writes: 51.49 4.86
    User calls: 224.69 21.22
    Parses: 235.22 22.21
    Hard parses: 4.83 0.46
    Sorts: 102.94 9.72
    Logons: 1.12 0.11
    Executes: 821.11 77.55
    Transactions: 10.59   -- User calls and Parse count are almost same, means most of the calls are for parse. Most of the parses are soft. Per transaction 22 parses are very high figure.
    -- Not much disk I/O activity. Most of the reads are being satisfy from memory.
    Instance Efficiency
    Buffer Nowait %: 100.00 Redo NoWait %: 100.00
    Buffer Hit %: 99.92 In-memory Sort %: 100.00
    Library Hit %: 98.92 Soft Parse %: 97.95
    Execute to Parse %: 71.35 Latch Hit %: 99.98
    Parse CPU to Parse Elapsd %: 16.82 % Non-Parse CPU: 91.41 -- Low execute to parse ratio denotes CPU is significantly busy in parsing. Soft Parse% showing, most of the parse are soft parses. It means we should concentrate on soft parsing activity.
    -- Parse CPU to Parse Elapsed % is quite low, means some bottleneck is there related to parsing. It could be a side-effect of huge parsing pressure. Like CPU cycles are not available.
    Shared Pool Statistics
    Begin End
    Memory Usage %: 81.01 81.92
    % SQL with executions>1: 88.51 86.93
    % Memory for SQL w/exec>1: 86.16 86.76 -- Shared Pool memory seems ok (in 80% range)
    -- 88% of the SQLs are repeating ones. It's a good sign.
    Top 5 Timed Events
    Event Waits Time(s) Avg Wait(ms) % Total Call Time Wait Class
    library cache load lock 24,243 64,286 2,652 26.5 Concurrency
    db file sequential read 1,580,769 42,267 27 17.4 User I/O
    CPU time   33,039   13.6  
    latch: library cache 53,013 29,194 551 12.0 Concurrency
    db file scattered read 151,669 13,550 89 5.6 User I/O Problem-1: Contention on Library cache: May be due to under-sized shared pool, incorrect parameters, poor application design, But since we already observed that most of the parses are soft parses and shared pool usgae in 80%, seems problem related to holding cursors. open_cursors/session_cached_cursors are red flags.
    Problem-2: User I/O, may be due to poor SQLs, I/O sub-system, or poor physical design (wrong indexes are being used as DB file seq reads)
    Wait Class
    Wait Class Waits %Time -outs Total Wait Time (s) Avg wait (ms) Waits /txn
    Concurrency 170,577 44.58 109,020 639 0.64
    User I/O 2,001,978 0.00 59,662 30 7.49
    System I/O 564,771 0.00 8,069 14 2.11
    Application 145,106 1.25 6,352 44 0.54
    Commit 176,671 0.37 4,528 26 0.66
    Other 27,557 6.31 2,532 92 0.10
    Network 6,862,704 0.00 696 0 25.68
    Configuration 3,858 3.71 141 37 0.01
    Wait Events
    Event Waits %Time -outs Total Wait Time (s) Avg wait (ms) Waits /txn
    library cache load lock 24,243 83.95 64,286 2652 0.09
    db file sequential read 1,580,769 0.00 42,267 27 5.91
    latch: library cache 53,013 0.00 29,194 551 0.20
    db file scattered read 151,669 0.00 13,550 89 0.57
    latch: shared pool 25,403 0.00 12,969 511 0.10
    log file sync 176,671 0.37 4,528 26 0.66
    enq: TM - contention 1,455 90.93 3,975 2732 0.01 Instance Activity Stats
    opened cursors cumulative 5,290,760 209.60 19.80
    parse count (failures) 6,181 0.24 0.02
    parse count (hard) 121,841 4.83 0.46
    parse count (total) 5,937,336 235.22 22.21
    parse time cpu 283,787 11.24 1.06
    parse time elapsed 1,687,096 66.84 6.31 Latch Activity
    library cache 85,042,375 0.15 0.43 29194 304,831 7.16
    library cache load lock 257,089 0.00 1.20 0 69,065 0.00
    library cache lock 41,467,300 0.02 0.07 6 2,714 0.07
    library cache lock allocation 730,422 0.00 0.44 0 0  
    library cache pin 28,453,986 0.01 0.16 8 167 0.00
    library cache pin allocation 509,000 0.00 0.38 0 0 Init.ora parameters
    cursor_sharing= EXACT
    open_cursors= 3000
    session_cached_cursors= 0
    -- open_cursors value is too high. I have checked that maximum usage by a single session is 12%.
    -- session_cached_cursors are 0 causing soft parsing. 500/600 is good number to start with.
    cursor_sharing exact may cause hard parses. But here, hard parsing is comparatively small, we can ignore this.
    From v$librarycache
    NAMESPACE             GETS    GETHITS GETHITRATIO       PINS PINHITRATIO    RELOADS INVALIDATIONS
    SQL AREA            162827      25127  .154317159  748901435  .999153087     107941         81886-- high invalidation count due to DDL like activities.
    -- high reloads due to small library cache.
    -- hit ratio too small.
    -- Need to pin frequently executed objects into library cache.
    P.S. Same question asked on Oracle_L, but due to formatting reasons, pasing duplicate contents here.
    Regards,
    Neeraj Bhatia
    Edited by: Neeraj.Bhatia2 on Jul 13, 2009 6:51 AM                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

    Thanks Charles. I really appreciate your efforts to diagnose the issue.
    I agree with you performance issue is caused by soft parsing, which can be solved by holding cursors (session_cached_cursors). It may be due to oversized shared pool, which is causing delay in searching child cursors.
    My second thought is, there is large number of reloads, which can be due to under-sized shared pool, if invalidation activities are not going (CBO statistics collection, DDL etc), cursors are being flushed frequently.
    CPU utilization is continuously high (above 90%). Pasting additional information from same AWR report.
    Namespace                Get Requests       Pct Miss        Pin Requests         Pct Miss      Reloads        Invalidations
    BODY                       225,345               0.76            4,965,541            0.15           5,533           0
    CLUSTER                   1,278                  1.41            2,542                  1.73           26                0
    INDEX                       5,982                  9.31            13,922                7.35           258               0
    SQL AREA                  141,465              54.10           27,831,235         1.21           69,863          19,085 Latch Miss Sources
    Latch Name             Where                                         NoWait Misses                 Sleeps             Waiter Sleeps
    library cache lock       kgllkdl: child: no lock handle             0                                   8,250                   5,792 Time Model Statistics
    Statistic Name                                                                           Time (s)                               % of DB Time
    sql execute elapsed time                                                           206,979.31                                      85.27
    PL/SQL execution elapsed time                                                    94,651.78                                      39.00
    DB CPU                                                                                     33,039.29                                      13.61
    parse time elapsed                                                                      22,635.47                                       9.33
    inbound PL/SQL rpc elapsed time                                                  14,763.48                                       6.08
    hard parse elapsed time                                                               14,136.77                                       5.82
    connection management call elapsed time                                        1,625.07                                       0.67
    PL/SQL compilation elapsed time                                                        760.76                                       0.31
    repeated bind elapsed time                                                               664.81                                       0.27
    hard parse (sharing criteria) elapsed time                                             500.11                                       0.21
    Java execution elapsed time                                                              252.95                                       0.10
    failed parse elapsed time                                                                   167.23                                       0.07
    hard parse (bind mismatch) elapsed time                                             124.11                                       0.05
    sequence load elapsed time                                                                23.34                                        0.01
    DB time                                                                                   242,720.12  
    background elapsed time                                                             11,645.52  
    background cpu time                                                                      247.25 According to this DB CPU is 65% utilization (DB CPU + Background CPU / Total Available CPU seconds). While at the same time DB host was 95% utilized (confirmed from DBA_HIST_SYSMETRIC_SUMMARY).
    Operating System Statistics
    Statistic                                         Total
    BUSY_TIME                             3,586,030
    IDLE_TIME                              1,545,064
    IOWAIT_TIME                              22,237
    NICE_TIME                                           0
    SYS_TIME                                  197,661
    USER_TIME                              3,319,452
    LOAD                                                 11
    RSRC_MGR_CPU_WAIT_TIME                  0
    PHYSICAL_MEMORY_BYTES          867,180
    NUM_CPUS                                           2

  • Pre-loading Oracle text in memory with Oracle 12c

    There is a white paper from Roger Ford that explains how to load the Oracle index in memory : http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/enterprise-edition/mem-load-082296.html
    In our application, Oracle 12c, we are indexing a big XML field (which is stored as XMLType with storage secure file) with the PATH_SECTION_GROUP. If I don't load the I table (DR$..$I) into memory using the technique explained in the white paper then I cannot have decent performance (and especially not predictable performance, it looks like if the blocks from the TOKEN_INFO columns are not memory then performance can fall sharply)
    But after migrating to oracle 12c, I got a different problem, which I can reproduce: when I create the index it is relatively small (as seen with ctx_report.index_size) and by applying the technique from the whitepaper, I can pin the DR$ I table into memory. But as soon as I do a ctx_ddl.optimize_index('Index','REBUILD') the size becomes much bigger and I can't pin the index in memory. Not sure if it is bug or not.
    What I found as work-around is to build the index with the following storage options:
    ctx_ddl.create_preference('TEST_STO','BASIC_STORAGE');
    ctx_ddl.set_attribute ('TEST_STO', 'BIG_IO', 'YES' );
    ctx_ddl.set_attribute ('TEST_STO', 'SEPARATE_OFFSETS', 'NO' );
    so that the token_info column will be stored in a secure file. Then I can change the storage of that column to put it in the keep buffer cache, and write a procedure to read the LOB so that it will be loaded in the keep cache. The size of the LOB column is more or less the same as when creating the index without the BIG_IO option but it remains constant even after a ctx_dll.optimize_index. The procedure to read the LOB and to load it into the cache is very similar to the loaddollarR procedure from the white paper.
    Because of the SDATA section, there is a new DR table (S table) and an IOT on top of it. This is not documented in the white paper (the white paper was written for Oracle 10g). In my case this DR$ S table is much used, and the IOT also, but putting it in the keep cache is not as important as the token_info column of the DR I table. A final note: doing SEPARATE_OFFSETS = 'YES' was very bad in my case, the combined size of the two columns is much bigger than having only the TOKEN_INFO column and both columns are read.
    Here is an example on how to reproduce the problem with the size increasing when doing ctx_optimize
    1. create the table
    drop table test;
    CREATE TABLE test
    (ID NUMBER(9,0) NOT NULL ENABLE,
    XML_DATA XMLTYPE
    XMLTYPE COLUMN XML_DATA STORE AS SECUREFILE BINARY XML (tablespace users disable storage in row);
    2. insert a few records
    insert into test values(1,'<Book><TITLE>Tale of Two Cities</TITLE>It was the best of times.<Author NAME="Charles Dickens"> Born in England in the town, Stratford_Upon_Avon </Author></Book>');
    insert into test values(2,'<BOOK><TITLE>The House of Mirth</TITLE>Written in 1905<Author NAME="Edith Wharton"> Wharton was born to George Frederic Jones and Lucretia Stevens Rhinelander in New York City.</Author></BOOK>');
    insert into test values(3,'<BOOK><TITLE>Age of innocence</TITLE>She got a prize for it.<Author NAME="Edith Wharton"> Wharton was born to George Frederic Jones and Lucretia Stevens Rhinelander in New York City.</Author></BOOK>');
    3. create the text index
    drop index i_test;
      exec ctx_ddl.create_section_group('TEST_SGP','PATH_SECTION_GROUP');
    begin
      CTX_DDL.ADD_SDATA_SECTION(group_name => 'TEST_SGP', 
                                section_name => 'SData_02',
                                tag => 'SData_02',
                                datatype => 'varchar2');
    end;
    exec ctx_ddl.create_preference('TEST_STO','BASIC_STORAGE');
    exec  ctx_ddl.set_attribute('TEST_STO','I_TABLE_CLAUSE','tablespace USERS storage (initial 64K)');
    exec  ctx_ddl.set_attribute('TEST_STO','I_INDEX_CLAUSE','tablespace USERS storage (initial 64K) compress 2');
    exec  ctx_ddl.set_attribute ('TEST_STO', 'BIG_IO', 'NO' );
    exec  ctx_ddl.set_attribute ('TEST_STO', 'SEPARATE_OFFSETS', 'NO' );
    create index I_TEST
      on TEST (XML_DATA)
      indextype is ctxsys.context
      parameters('
        section group   "TEST_SGP"
        storage         "TEST_STO"
      ') parallel 2;
    4. check the index size
    select ctx_report.index_size('I_TEST') from dual;
    it says :
    TOTALS FOR INDEX TEST.I_TEST
    TOTAL BLOCKS ALLOCATED:                                                104
    TOTAL BLOCKS USED:                                                      72
    TOTAL BYTES ALLOCATED:                                 851,968 (832.00 KB)
    TOTAL BYTES USED:                                      589,824 (576.00 KB)
    4. optimize the index
    exec ctx_ddl.optimize_index('I_TEST','REBUILD');
    and now recompute the size, it says
    TOTALS FOR INDEX TEST.I_TEST
    TOTAL BLOCKS ALLOCATED:                                               1112
    TOTAL BLOCKS USED:                                                    1080
    TOTAL BYTES ALLOCATED:                                 9,109,504 (8.69 MB)
    TOTAL BYTES USED:                                      8,847,360 (8.44 MB)
    which shows that it went from 576KB to 8.44MB. With a big index the difference is not so big, but still from 14G to 19G.
    5. Workaround: use the BIG_IO option, so that the token_info column of the DR$ I table will be stored in a secure file and the size will stay relatively small. Then you can load this column in the cache using a procedure similar to
    alter table DR$I_TEST$I storage (buffer_pool keep);
    alter table dr$i_test$i modify lob(token_info) (cache storage (buffer_pool keep));
    rem: now we must read the lob so that it will be loaded in the keep buffer pool, use the prccedure below
    create or replace procedure loadTokenInfo is
      type c_type is ref cursor;
      c2 c_type;
      s varchar2(2000);
      b blob;
      buff varchar2(100);
      siz number;
      off number;
      cntr number;
    begin
        s := 'select token_info from  DR$i_test$I';
        open c2 for s;
        loop
           fetch c2 into b;
           exit when c2%notfound;
           siz := 10;
           off := 1;
           cntr := 0;
           if dbms_lob.getlength(b) > 0 then
             begin
               loop
                 dbms_lob.read(b, siz, off, buff);
                 cntr := cntr + 1;
                 off := off + 4096;
               end loop;
             exception when no_data_found then
               if cntr > 0 then
                 dbms_output.put_line('4K chunks fetched: '||cntr);
               end if;
             end;
           end if;
        end loop;
    end;
    Rgds, Pierre

    I have been working a lot on that issue recently, I can give some more info.
    First I totally agree with you, I don't like to use the keep_pool and I would love to avoid it. On the other hand, we have a specific use case : 90% of the activity in the DB is done by queuing and dbms_scheduler jobs where response time does not matter. All those processes are probably filling the buffer cache. We have a customer facing application that uses the text index to search the database : performance is critical for them.
    What kind of performance do you have with your application ?
    In my case, I have learned the hard way that having the index in memory (the DR$I table in fact) is the key : if it is not, then performance is poor. I find it reasonable to pin the DR$I table in memory and if you look at competitors this is what they do. With MongoDB they explicitly says that the index must be in memory. With elasticsearch, they use JVM's that are also in memory. And effectively, if you look at the awr report, you will see that Oracle is continuously accessing the DR$I table, there is a SQL similar to
    SELECT /*+ DYNAMIC_SAMPLING(0) INDEX(i) */    
    TOKEN_FIRST, TOKEN_LAST, TOKEN_COUNT, ROWID    
    FROM DR$idxname$I
    WHERE TOKEN_TEXT = :word AND TOKEN_TYPE = :wtype    
    ORDER BY TOKEN_TEXT,  TOKEN_TYPE,  TOKEN_FIRST
    which is continuously done.
    I think that the algorithm used by Oracle to keep blocks in cache is too complex. A just realized that in 12.1.0.2 (was released last week) there is finally a "killer" functionality, the in-memory parameters, with which you can pin tables or columns in memory with compression, etc. this looks ideal for the text index, I hope that R. Ford will finally update his white paper :-)
    But my other problem was that the optimize_index in REBUILD mode caused the DR$I table to double in size : it seems crazy that this was closed as not a bug but it was and I can't do anything about it. It is a bug in my opinion, because the create index command and "alter index rebuild" command both result in a much smaller index, so why would the guys that developped the optimize function (is it another team, using another algorithm ?) make the index two times bigger ?
    And for that the track I have been following is to put the index in a 16K tablespace : in this case the space used by the index remains more or less flat (increases but much more reasonably). The difficulty here is to pin the index in memory because the trick of R. Ford was not working anymore.
    What worked:
    first set the keep_pool to zero and set the db_16k_cache_size to instead. Then change the storage preference to make sure that everything you want to cache (mostly the DR$I) table come in the tablespace with the non-standard block size of 16k.
    Then comes the tricky part : the pre-loading of the data in the buffer cache. The problem is that with Oracle 12c, Oracle will use direct_path_read for FTS which basically means that it bypasses the cache and read directory from file to the PGA !!! There is an event to avoid that, I was lucky to find it on a blog (I can't remember which, sorry for the credit).
    I ended-up doing that. the events to 10949 is to avoid the direct path reads issue.
    alter session set events '10949 trace name context forever, level 1';
    alter table DR#idxname0001$I cache;
    alter table DR#idxname0002$I cache;
    alter table DR#idxname0003$I cache;
    SELECT /*+ FULL(ITAB) CACHE(ITAB) */ SUM(TOKEN_COUNT),  SUM(LENGTH(TOKEN_INFO)) FROM DR#idxname0001$I;
    SELECT /*+ FULL(ITAB) CACHE(ITAB) */ SUM(TOKEN_COUNT),  SUM(LENGTH(TOKEN_INFO)) FROM DR#idxname0002$I;
    SELECT /*+ FULL(ITAB) CACHE(ITAB) */ SUM(TOKEN_COUNT),  SUM(LENGTH(TOKEN_INFO)) FROM DR#idxname0003$I;
    SELECT /*+ INDEX(ITAB) CACHE(ITAB) */  SUM(LENGTH(TOKEN_TEXT)) FROM DR#idxname0001$I ITAB;
    SELECT /*+ INDEX(ITAB) CACHE(ITAB) */  SUM(LENGTH(TOKEN_TEXT)) FROM DR#idxname0002$I ITAB;
    SELECT /*+ INDEX(ITAB) CACHE(ITAB) */  SUM(LENGTH(TOKEN_TEXT)) FROM DR#idxname0003$I ITAB;
    It worked. With a big relief I expected to take some time out, but there was a last surprise. The command
    exec ctx_ddl.optimize_index(idx_name=>'idxname',part_name=>'partname',optlevel=>'REBUILD');
    gqve the following
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-20000: Oracle Text error:
    DRG-50857: oracle error in drftoptrebxch
    ORA-14097: column type or size mismatch in ALTER TABLE EXCHANGE PARTITION
    ORA-06512: at "CTXSYS.DRUE", line 160
    ORA-06512: at "CTXSYS.CTX_DDL", line 1141
    ORA-06512: at line 1
    Which is very much exactly described in a metalink note 1645634.1 but in the case of a non-partitioned index. The work-around given seemed very logical but it did not work in the case of a partitioned index. After experimenting, I found out that the bug occurs when the partitioned index is created with  dbms_pclxutil.build_part_index procedure (this enables  enables intra-partition parallelism in the index creation process). This is a very annoying and stupid bug, maybe there is a work-around, but did not find it on metalink
    Other points of attention with the text index creation (stuff that surprised me at first !) ;
    - if you use the dbms_pclxutil package, then the ctx_output logging does not work, because the index is created immediately and then populated in the background via dbms_jobs.
    - this in combination with the fact that if you are on a RAC, you won't see any activity on the box can be very frightening : this is because oracle can choose to start the workers on the other node.
    I understand much better how the text indexing works, I think it is a great technology which can scale via partitioning. But like always the design of the application is crucial, most of our problems come from the fact that we did not choose the right sectioning (we choosed PATH_SECTION_GROUP while XML_SECTION_GROUP is so much better IMO). Maybe later I can convince the dev to change the sectionining, especially because SDATA and MDATA section are not supported with PATCH_SECTION_GROUP (although it seems to work, even though we had one occurence of a bad result linked to the existence of SDATA in the index definition). Also the whole problematic of mixed structured/unstructured searches is completly tackled if one use XML_SECTION_GROUP with MDATA/SDATA (but of course the app was written for Oracle 10...)
    Regards, Pierre

  • Blank awr report shown in oracle standars edition 11g (11.2.0.1.0)

    Hi, friends ..
    I am using Oracle 11g standars edition(11.2.0.1.0) on solaris 10 platform.I do have a very strange probleem..when iam trying to capture awr report i am getting a blank
    awr report contain ing nothing...like below section
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------->
    WARNING: Since the DB Time is less than one second, there was minimal foreground activity in the snapshot period. Some of the percentage values will be invalid.
    WORKLOAD REPOSITORY report for
    DB Name DB Id Instance Inst num Startup Time Release RAC
    DISDB 771054785 disdb 1 30-Dec-10 10:12 11.2.0.1.0 NO
    Host Name Platform CPUs Cores Sockets Memory (GB)
    dissemination-new Solaris Operating System (x86-64) .00
    Snap Id Snap Time Sessions Cursors/Session
    Begin Snap: 1 30-Dec-10 11:30:21
    End Snap: 2 30-Dec-10 12:30:52
    Elapsed: 60.51 (mins)
    DB Time: 0.00 (mins)
    Report Summary
    Cache Sizes
    Begin End
    Buffer Cache: M M Std Block Size: K
    Shared Pool Size: 0M 0M Log Buffer: K
    Load Profile
    Per Second Per Transaction Per Exec Per Call
    DB Time(s): 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00
    DB CPU(s): 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00
    Redo size:
    Logical reads: 0.0 1.0
    Block changes: 0.0 1.0
    Physical reads: 0.0 1.0
    Physical writes: 0.0 1.0
    User calls: 0.0 1.0
    Parses: 0.0 1.0
    Hard parses:
    W/A MB processed: 0.0 0.0
    Logons:
    Executes: 0.0 1.0
    Rollbacks:
    Transactions: 0.0
    Instance Efficiency Percentages (Target 100%)
    Buffer Nowait %: Redo NoWait %:
    Buffer Hit %: In-memory Sort %:
    Library Hit %: Soft Parse %:
    Execute to Parse %: 0.00 Latch Hit %:
    Parse CPU to Parse Elapsd %: % Non-Parse CPU:
    Shared Pool Statisitics Not Available
    Top 5 Timed Foreground Events
    Event Waits Time(s) Avg wait (ms) % DB time Wait Class
    DB CPU 0 100.00
    Host CPU (CPUs: Cores: Sockets: )
    Load Average Begin Load Average End %User %System %WIO %Idle
    Instance CPU
    %Total CPU %Busy CPU %DB time waiting for CPU (Resource Manager)
    Memory Statistics
    Begin End
    Host Mem (MB):
    SGA use (MB):
    PGA use (MB):
    % Host Mem used for SGA+PGA:
    Main Report
    Report Summary
    Wait Events Statistics
    SQL Statistics
    Instance Activity Statistics
    IO Stats
    Buffer Pool Statistics
    Advisory Statistics
    Wait Statistics
    Undo Statistics
    Latch Statistics
    Segment Statistics
    Dictionary Cache Statistics
    Library Cache Statistics
    Memory Statistics
    Streams Statistics
    Resource Limit Statistics
    Shared Server Statistics
    init.ora Parameters
    Back to Top
    Wait Events Statistics
    Time Model Statistics
    Operating System Statistics
    Operating System Statistics - Detail
    Foreground Wait Class
    Foreground Wait Events
    Background Wait Events
    Wait Event Histogram
    Wait Event Histogram Detail (64 msec to 2 sec)
    Wait Event Histogram Detail (4 sec to 2 min)
    Wait Event Histogram Detail (4 min to 1 hr)
    Service Statistics
    Service Wait Class Stats
    Back to Top
    Time Model Statistics
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Wait Events Statistics
    Back to Top
    Operating System Statistics
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Wait Events Statistics
    Back to Top
    Operating System Statistics - Detail
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Wait Events Statistics
    Back to Top
    Foreground Wait Class
    s - second, ms - millisecond - 1000th of a second
    ordered by wait time desc, waits desc
    %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
    Captured Time accounts for % of Total DB time .00 (s)
    Total FG Wait Time: (s) DB CPU time: .00 (s)
    Wait Class Waits %Time -outs Total Wait Time (s) Avg wait (ms) %DB time
    DB CPU 0 100.00
    Back to Wait Events Statistics
    Back to Top
    Foreground Wait Events
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Wait Events Statistics
    Back to Top
    Background Wait Events
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Wait Events Statistics
    Back to Top
    Wait Event Histogram
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Wait Events Statistics
    Back to Top
    Wait Event Histogram Detail (64 msec to 2 sec)
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Wait Events Statistics
    Back to Top
    Wait Event Histogram Detail (4 sec to 2 min)
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Wait Events Statistics
    Back to Top
    Wait Event Histogram Detail (4 min to 1 hr)
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Wait Events Statistics
    Back to Top
    Service Statistics
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Wait Events Statistics
    Back to Top
    Service Wait Class Stats
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Wait Events Statistics
    Back to Top
    SQL Statistics
    SQL ordered by Elapsed Time
    SQL ordered by CPU Time
    SQL ordered by User I/O Wait Time
    SQL ordered by Gets
    SQL ordered by Reads
    SQL ordered by Physical Reads (UnOptimized)
    SQL ordered by Executions
    SQL ordered by Parse Calls
    SQL ordered by Sharable Memory
    SQL ordered by Version Count
    Complete List of SQL Text
    Back to Top
    SQL ordered by Elapsed Time
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to SQL Statistics
    Back to Top
    SQL ordered by CPU Time
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to SQL Statistics
    Back to Top
    SQL ordered by User I/O Wait Time
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to SQL Statistics
    Back to Top
    SQL ordered by Gets
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to SQL Statistics
    Back to Top
    SQL ordered by Reads
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to SQL Statistics
    Back to Top
    SQL ordered by Physical Reads (UnOptimized)
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to SQL Statistics
    Back to Top
    SQL ordered by Executions
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to SQL Statistics
    Back to Top
    SQL ordered by Parse Calls
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to SQL Statistics
    Back to Top
    SQL ordered by Sharable Memory
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to SQL Statistics
    Back to Top
    SQL ordered by Version Count
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to SQL Statistics
    Back to Top
    Complete List of SQL Text
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to SQL Statistics
    Back to Top
    Instance Activity Statistics
    Instance Activity Stats
    Instance Activity Stats - Absolute Values
    Instance Activity Stats - Thread Activity
    Back to Top
    Instance Activity Stats
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Instance Activity Statistics
    Back to Top
    Instance Activity Stats - Absolute Values
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Instance Activity Statistics
    Back to Top
    Instance Activity Stats - Thread Activity
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Instance Activity Statistics
    Back to Top
    IO Stats
    IOStat by Function summary
    IOStat by Filetype summary
    IOStat by Function/Filetype summary
    Tablespace IO Stats
    File IO Stats
    Back to Top
    IOStat by Function summary
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to IO Stats
    Back to Top
    IOStat by Filetype summary
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to IO Stats
    Back to Top
    IOStat by Function/Filetype summary
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to IO Stats
    Back to Top
    Tablespace IO Stats
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to IO Stats
    Back to Top
    File IO Stats
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to IO Stats
    Back to Top
    Buffer Pool Statistics
    Buffer Pool Statistics
    Checkpoint Activity
    Back to Top
    Buffer Pool Statistics
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Buffer Pool Statistics
    Back to Top
    Checkpoint Activity
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Buffer Pool Statistics
    Back to Top
    Advisory Statistics
    Instance Recovery Stats
    MTTR Advisory
    Buffer Pool Advisory
    PGA Aggr Summary
    PGA Aggr Target Stats
    PGA Aggr Target Histogram
    PGA Memory Advisory
    Shared Pool Advisory
    SGA Target Advisory
    Streams Pool Advisory
    Java Pool Advisory
    Back to Top
    Instance Recovery Stats
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Advisory Statistics
    Back to Top
    MTTR Advisory
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Advisory Statistics
    Back to Top
    Buffer Pool Advisory
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Advisory Statistics
    Back to Top
    PGA Aggr Summary
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Advisory Statistics
    Back to Top
    PGA Aggr Target Stats
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Advisory Statistics
    Back to Top
    PGA Aggr Target Histogram
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Advisory Statistics
    Back to Top
    PGA Memory Advisory
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Advisory Statistics
    Back to Top
    Shared Pool Advisory
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Advisory Statistics
    Back to Top
    SGA Target Advisory
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Advisory Statistics
    Back to Top
    Streams Pool Advisory
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Advisory Statistics
    Back to Top
    Java Pool Advisory
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Advisory Statistics
    Back to Top
    Wait Statistics
    Buffer Wait Statistics
    Enqueue Activity
    Back to Top
    Buffer Wait Statistics
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Wait Statistics
    Back to Top
    Enqueue Activity
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Wait Statistics
    Back to Top
    Undo Statistics
    Undo Segment Summary
    Undo Segment Stats
    Back to Top
    Undo Segment Summary
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Undo Statistics
    Back to Top
    Undo Segment Stats
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Undo Statistics
    Back to Top
    Latch Statistics
    Latch Activity
    Latch Sleep Breakdown
    Latch Miss Sources
    Mutex Sleep Summary
    Parent Latch Statistics
    Child Latch Statistics
    Back to Top
    Latch Activity
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Latch Statistics
    Back to Top
    Latch Sleep Breakdown
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Latch Statistics
    Back to Top
    Latch Miss Sources
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Latch Statistics
    Back to Top
    Mutex Sleep Summary
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Latch Statistics
    Back to Top
    Parent Latch Statistics
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Latch Statistics
    Back to Top
    Child Latch Statistics
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Latch Statistics
    Back to Top
    Segment Statistics
    Segments by Logical Reads
    Segments by Physical Reads
    Segments by Physical Read Requests
    Segments by UnOptimized Reads
    Segments by Optimized Reads
    Segments by Direct Physical Reads
    Segments by Physical Writes
    Segments by Physical Write Requests
    Segments by Direct Physical Writes
    Segments by Table Scans
    Segments by DB Blocks Changes
    Segments by Row Lock Waits
    Segments by ITL Waits
    Segments by Buffer Busy Waits
    Back to Top
    Segments by Logical Reads
    Total Logical Reads: 1
    Captured Segments account for 4.6E+06% of Total
    Owner Tablespace Name Object Name Subobject Name Obj. Type Logical Reads %Total
    SYS SYSTEM I_SYSAUTH1 INDEX 15,008 1500800.00
    SYS SYSTEM I_OBJ2 INDEX 4,752 475200.00
    SYS SYSTEM TAB$ TABLE 2,176 217600.00
    SYS SYSTEM I_JOB_NEXT INDEX 1,856 185600.00
    SYS SYSTEM SYS_C00646 INDEX 1,664 166400.00
    Back to Segment Statistics
    Back to Top
    Segments by Physical Reads
    Total Physical Reads: 1
    Captured Segments account for 400.0% of Total
    Owner Tablespace Name Object Name Subobject Name Obj. Type Physical Reads %Total
    SYS SYSAUX WRH$_SYSMETRIC_SUMMARY_INDEX INDEX 3 300.00
    SYS SYSTEM KOTAD$ TABLE 1 100.00
    Back to Segment Statistics
    Back to Top
    Segments by Physical Read Requests
    Total Physical Read Requests: 1
    Captured Segments account for 400.0% of Total
    Owner Tablespace Name Object Name Subobject Name Obj. Type Phys Read Requests %Total
    SYS SYSAUX WRH$_SYSMETRIC_SUMMARY_INDEX INDEX 3 300.00
    SYS SYSTEM KOTAD$ TABLE 1 100.00
    Back to Segment Statistics
    Back to Top
    Segments by UnOptimized Reads
    Total UnOptimized Read Requests: 1
    Captured Segments account for 400.0% of Total
    Owner Tablespace Name Object Name Subobject Name Obj. Type UnOptimized Reads %Total
    SYS SYSAUX WRH$_SYSMETRIC_SUMMARY_INDEX INDEX 3 300.00
    SYS SYSTEM KOTAD$ TABLE 1 100.00
    Back to Segment Statistics
    Back to Top
    Segments by Optimized Reads
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Segment Statistics
    Back to Top
    Segments by Direct Physical Reads
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Segment Statistics
    Back to Top
    Segments by Physical Writes
    Total Physical Writes: 1
    Captured Segments account for 1.1E+04% of Total
    Owner Tablespace Name Object Name Subobject Name Obj. Type Physical Writes %Total
    SYSMAN SYSAUX MGMT_METRICS_RAW_PK INDEX 27 2700.00
    SYS SYSAUX WRH$_SYSMETRIC_HISTORY TABLE 16 1600.00
    SYS SYSAUX WRH$_SYSMETRIC_HISTORY_INDEX INDEX 16 1600.00
    SYSMAN SYSAUX MGMT_SYSTEM_PERF_LOG_IDX_01 INDEX 9 900.00
    SYS SYSAUX SMON_SCN_TIME TABLE 9 900.00
    Back to Segment Statistics
    Back to Top
    Segments by Physical Write Requests
    Total Physical Write Requestss: 1
    Captured Segments account for 5.1E+03% of Total
    Owner Tablespace Name Object Name Subobject Name Obj. Type Phys Write Requests %Total
    SYSMAN SYSAUX MGMT_METRICS_RAW_PK INDEX 11 1100.00
    SYS SYSAUX SMON_SCN_TIME TABLE 9 900.00
    SYSMAN SYSAUX MGMT_SYSTEM_PERF_LOG_IDX_01 INDEX 6 600.00
    SYSMAN SYSAUX MGMT_CURRENT_METRICS_PK INDEX 4 400.00
    SYS SYSTEM I_JOB_NEXT INDEX 2 200.00
    Back to Segment Statistics
    Back to Top
    Segments by Direct Physical Writes
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Segment Statistics
    Back to Top
    Segments by Table Scans
    Total Table Scans: 1
    Captured Segments account for 900.0% of Total
    Owner Tablespace Name Object Name Subobject Name Obj. Type Table Scans %Total
    SYS SYSTEM I_OBJ2 INDEX 9 900.00
    Back to Segment Statistics
    Back to Top
    Segments by DB Blocks Changes
    % of Capture shows % of DB Block Changes for each top segment compared
    with total DB Block Changes for all segments captured by the Snapshot
    Owner Tablespace Name Object Name Subobject Name Obj. Type DB Block Changes % of Capture
    SYS SYSTEM I_JOB_NEXT INDEX 896 58.95
    SYSMAN SYSAUX MGMT_METRICS_RAW_PK INDEX 160 10.53
    SYSMAN SYSAUX MGMT_CURRENT_METRICS_PK INDEX 112 7.37
    SYS SYSAUX SMON_SCN_TIME TABLE 80 5.26
    SYSMAN SYSAUX MGMT_SYSTEM_PERF_LOG_IDX_01 INDEX 64 4.21
    Back to Segment Statistics
    Back to Top
    Segments by Row Lock Waits
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Segment Statistics
    Back to Top
    Segments by ITL Waits
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Segment Statistics
    Back to Top
    Segments by Buffer Busy Waits
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Segment Statistics
    Back to Top
    Dictionary Cache Stats
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Top
    Library Cache Activity
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Top
    Memory Statistics
    Memory Dynamic Components
    Memory Resize Operations Summary
    Memory Resize Ops
    Process Memory Summary
    SGA Memory Summary
    SGA breakdown difference
    Back to Top
    Memory Dynamic Components
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Memory Statistics
    Back to Top
    Memory Resize Operations Summary
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Memory Statistics
    Back to Top
    Memory Resize Ops
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Memory Statistics
    Back to Top
    Process Memory Summary
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Memory Statistics
    Back to Top
    Back to Memory Statistics
    Back to Top
    SGA breakdown difference
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Memory Statistics
    Back to Top
    Streams Statistics
    Streams CPU/IO Usage
    Streams Capture
    Streams Capture Rate
    Streams Apply
    Streams Apply Rate
    Buffered Queues
    Buffered Queue Subscribers
    Rule Set
    Persistent Queues
    Persistent Queues Rate
    Persistent Queue Subscribers
    Back to Top
    Streams CPU/IO Usage
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Streams Statistics
    Back to Top
    Streams Capture
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Streams Statistics
    Back to Top
    Streams Capture Rate
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Streams Statistics
    Back to Top
    Streams Apply
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Streams Statistics
    Back to Top
    Streams Apply Rate
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Streams Statistics
    Back to Top
    Buffered Queues
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Streams Statistics
    Back to Top
    Buffered Queue Subscribers
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Streams Statistics
    Back to Top
    Rule Set
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Streams Statistics
    Back to Top
    Persistent Queues
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Streams Statistics
    Back to Top
    Persistent Queues Rate
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Streams Statistics
    Back to Top
    Persistent Queue Subscribers
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Streams Statistics
    Back to Top
    Resource Limit Stats
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Top
    Shared Server Statistics
    Shared Servers Activity
    Shared Servers Rates
    Shared Servers Utilization
    Shared Servers Common Queue
    Shared Servers Dispatchers
    Back to Top
    Shared Servers Activity
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Shared Server Statistics
    Back to Top
    Shared Servers Rates
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Shared Server Statistics
    Back to Top
    Shared Servers Utilization
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Shared Server Statistics
    Back to Top
    Shared Servers Common Queue
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Shared Server Statistics
    Back to Top
    Shared Servers Dispatchers
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Shared Server Statistics
    Back to Top
    init.ora Parameters
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Top
    Dynamic Remastering Stats
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to Top
    End of Report
    ---------------------------------------------->>
    here intresting is that i also can't have the memory section view also.i trien to clear awr repositary and recreate it..bounce database,also tried taking different snap value.But does notmake any change.can u tell me why tha happening..and how can i get a good awr report.

    Hi there,
    I have covered this in my blog entry on the subject. Check that link out for more licensing information and other resources.
    The problem you are experiencing is caused by the fact that AWR is part of the DIAGNOSTIC and TUNING packs of Oracle 11g, which as of 11g is no longer a standard feature of the database but rather an optional extra which must be licensed in addition to your default Oracle Standard Edition package. In terms of the licensing, you just need to license it as an optional extra so that you will actually be using it legally, and then you can go ahead and enable it.
    While it may be an additional licensed item, it is actually installed on your DB by default, but is just not enabled. So, once you have cleared the licensing issue, you will be free to enable diagnostics by setting the new database parameter, CONTROL_MANAGEMENT_PACK_ACCESS. You can do this by running the following as a dba:
    <pre>alter system set control_management_pack_access="DIAGNOSTIC+TUNING" scope=both;</pre>
    After running this command, your database will start accumulating diagnostic information. Note that you will need to wait until new snapshots are created in which the new diagnostic information will be available. I found that although most of the information became available after setting CONTROL_MANAGEMENT_PACK_ACCESS, it was only once the database was restarted that all of the information became available. I have seen many people reporting similar behavior.
    Old snapshots will obviously continue to give the errors because they did not have the diagnostic information available at the time.

  • Database Error: DBD::Oracle::db do failed: ORA-04030: out of process memory

    Hi
    I have a stored procedure that uses the XMLQuery function (SELECT XMLQuery( '......' RETURNING CONTENT) FROM dual; ) to extract data from 3 different tables and store the xml file in XML DB. This store procedure was running fine for a long time until 2 weeks ago where I started seeing the following error:
    Database Error: DBD::Oracle::db do failed: ORA-04030: out of process memory when trying to allocate 92 bytes (koh dur heap d,qmxtkWriteXobToOpn:heap)
    Currently I have 16,000 records. I am not sure what is going on, the size of the previous successful output xml file is about 2M. I also noticed when the stored procedure runs with 3G of system memory available, it basically used up all the memory and cpu time. The store proc consistently dies after 3.5 hour and spits out the ORA-04030 out of process memory error.
    Does anyone have any suggestion what to look for or what parameters I need to set? Thanks

    Unless your database is strictly a DSS-type of database, your AWR report exposes loads of issues with it. And I think none of the time during the AWR window was spent on database. Look at the DB time (with all those multi cores) compared with the elapsed time of the AWR.
    As you are on 11g, why not make use of MEMORY_TARGET (a single parameter to manage both SGA and PGA)? If you are already on it, ignore this as I can't see it anywhere. If not, get rid of SGA_TARGET and PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET and replace it with a single MEMORY_TARGET parameter. However you may have a minimum threshold set for different SGA pools so that they won't shrink beyond that point.
    Having said that, setting MEMORY_TARGET is not a guarantee to avoid ORA-4030. Just a single bad PL/SQL code could go and exploit the untunable part of your process memory and even go and blow up the physical memory. If you are using FORALL and BULK load, see if you can cut it down into few chunks rather than running as a single process.
    What does your V$PGASTAT say?

  • WARNING: out of private memory [1]

    The customer is seeing this warning message in the alert log file and the trace file. There is no other ORA error codes. What should we check for this warning?. Any inputs appreciated.
    Regards
    Sathya

    Odd they aren't seeing 4030 or 600 errors. We definitely need more information, which versions and platforms and such. Just pulling rabbits out of my hat, I'd say they either hit some memory leak or are seriously off on kernel settings.
    Cutting and pasting the alert log may be helpful too.
    It could be some user session that does something odd, like recursively generating rows in memory, blowing past pga aggregate suggestions. Still, I'd expect some other errors. If you could get some pga statistics (or better, a statspack or AWR), that might inform.
    I'd say, check out bug 5947623 and try that setting pgamax_size (with support, of course). My crystal ball says the customer is blowing way past any sensible PGA setting, getting an hp-ux error before a 4030 can be generated. But then again, my advice is worth what you are paying for it, or perhaps less.

  • Need help in reviewing AWR report

    Hello Friends,
    I need some information on reviewing this AWR report. Can you please tell me if you see any red flags or out of the ordinary? I’m trying to look for some performance or blocking issue that may be causing a process to run for longer than expected time or eventually terminate without finishing.
    C:\Users\SIDDHARTH\Documents\Desktop\awr_rpt_-wbprdsnap_193927_thru_193952.htm
    I do appreciate your help.
    Thank you,

    Hi Ehtiram,
    Thanks for your suggestion.
    I have enclosed SQL stat rpt. can you suggest me which SQL ID causing this issue.
    Elapsed Time (s) CPU Time (s) Executions  Elap per Exec (s)  % Total DB Time SQL Id SQL Module SQL Text
    24,349 1,734 8,057 3.02 4.19 8x7g7z2azkbwy java@lena015 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT ES.EMPSKD_ACT_START_TIM...
    19,014 4,960 8,800,248 0.00 3.27 0yg00z7gwc8xv java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT * FROM override o WHERE...
    16,686 583 2 8343.24 2.87 9btt17d327kjw java@lena018 (TNS V1-V3)  DELETE FROM so_results_detail ...
    12,969 189 1 12969.05 2.23 2rtppqwfnvucj java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT WRKS_WORK_DATE FROM J...
    11,432 9,712 2,138 5.35 1.96 07rqh01v58fqa java@lena018 (TNS V1-V3)  Select AMXAVS_ID from AMX_AVAI...
    9,683 676 12 806.96 1.66 8036tzu5fvvhg java@lena018 (TNS V1-V3)  DELETE FROM so_distrib_detail ...
    8,812 3,079 18,765 0.47 1.51 0crxpb0xurc21 java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  select (fd.fcast_calls + fd.fc...
    5,716 4,381 82,132 0.07 0.98 50cdgbs67apxr java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT PG.* FROM SO_SCHEDULE_G...
    5,364 110 47,005 0.11 0.92 9df2twkpvsw5p java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT USR.WBU_ID VUF_RCP_ID...
    4,911 4,080 7,996 0.61 0.84 g4yxt4nsahm6t java@lena015 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT R.RDR_UDF1 AS sGrace, ...
    Back to SQL Statistics
    Back to Top
    SQL ordered by CPU Time
    Resources reported for PL/SQL code includes the resources used by all SQL statements called by the code.
    % Total DB Time is the Elapsed Time of the SQL statement divided into the Total Database Time multiplied by 100
    CPU Time (s) Elapsed Time (s) Executions  CPU per Exec (s) % Total DB Time SQL Id SQL Module SQL Text
    9,712 11,432 2,138 4.54 1.96 07rqh01v58fqa java@lena018 (TNS V1-V3)  Select AMXAVS_ID from AMX_AVAI...
    4,960 19,014 8,800,248 0.00 3.27 0yg00z7gwc8xv java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT * FROM override o WHERE...
    4,626 4,718 1,196,614 0.00 0.81 0drcwvhmn0cnj java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  select SKDGRP_ID, VOLTYP_ID, ...
    4,381 5,716 82,132 0.05 0.98 50cdgbs67apxr java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT PG.* FROM SO_SCHEDULE_G...
    4,080 4,911 7,996 0.51 0.84 g4yxt4nsahm6t java@lena015 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT R.RDR_UDF1 AS sGrace, ...
    3,079 8,812 18,765 0.16 1.51 0crxpb0xurc21 java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  select (fd.fcast_calls + fd.fc...
    1,892 2,802 8,463,493 0.00 0.48 60tk6bna3qwbn java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT /*+INDEX(OVERRIDE IDX_O...
    1,734 24,349 8,057 0.22 4.19 8x7g7z2azkbwy java@lena015 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT ES.EMPSKD_ACT_START_TIM...
    1,437 1,438 157,923 0.01 0.25 75wjn3dnjq2x3 java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT * FROM CMPLNC_GROUP_FIL...
    1,241 2,243 19,223 0.06 0.39 fjucxsh2xum7c java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT emp.emp_id FROM employe...
    676 9,683 12 56.31 1.66 8036tzu5fvvhg java@lena018 (TNS V1-V3)  DELETE FROM so_distrib_detail ...
    583 16,686 2 291.61 2.87 9btt17d327kjw java@lena018 (TNS V1-V3)  DELETE FROM so_results_detail ...
    189 12,969 1 189.14 2.23 2rtppqwfnvucj java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT WRKS_WORK_DATE FROM J...
    Back to SQL Statistics
    Back to Top
    SQL ordered by Gets
    Resources reported for PL/SQL code includes the resources used by all SQL statements called by the code.
    Total Buffer Gets: 13,427,369,138
    Captured SQL account for 60.3% of Total
    Buffer Gets  Executions  Gets per Exec  %Total CPU Time (s) Elapsed Time (s) SQL Id SQL Module SQL Text
    3,403,579,267 2,138 1,591,945.40 25.35 9711.73 11431.76 07rqh01v58fqa java@lena018 (TNS V1-V3)  Select AMXAVS_ID from AMX_AVAI...
    1,070,482,359 1,196,614 894.59 7.97 4626.43 4718.30 0drcwvhmn0cnj java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  select SKDGRP_ID, VOLTYP_ID, ...
    421,090,926 18,765 22,440.23 3.14 3078.77 8812.06 0crxpb0xurc21 java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  select (fd.fcast_calls + fd.fc...
    322,602,711 8,800,248 36.66 2.40 4960.29 19013.56 0yg00z7gwc8xv java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT * FROM override o WHERE...
    287,681,734 19,223 14,965.50 2.14 1240.74 2243.16 fjucxsh2xum7c java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT emp.emp_id FROM employe...
    205,494,645 2,985,988 68.82 1.53 882.42 882.58 f736f78bg36fz java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT WBT_ID FROM SO_EMPLOYEE...
    189,266,051 114,985 1,646.01 1.41 703.31 710.28 4ca6cmu7vywx0 java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT CG.* FROM SO_SCHEDULE_G...
    180,050,736 2,478 72,659.70 1.34 840.37 3858.85 a13n3pt09jabr java@lena018 (TNS V1-V3)  DELETE FROM AMX_AVAIL_SUMMARY ...
    146,401,683 82,132 1,782.52 1.09 4381.09 5715.93 50cdgbs67apxr java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT PG.* FROM SO_SCHEDULE_G...
    133,298,999 60,547 2,201.58 0.99 515.19 802.26 cncd24nf9m6m6 java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT SO.*, EMP.* FROM SO_EM...
    Back to SQL Statistics
    Back to Top
    SQL ordered by Reads
    Total Disk Reads: 161,056,185
    Captured SQL account for 38.7% of Total
    Physical Reads Executions Reads per Exec  %Total CPU Time (s) Elapsed Time (s) SQL Id SQL Module SQL Text
    16,051,442 2 8,025,721.00 9.97 583.23 16686.47 9btt17d327kjw java@lena018 (TNS V1-V3)  DELETE FROM so_results_detail ...
    14,313,828 12 1,192,819.00 8.89 675.73 9683.47 8036tzu5fvvhg java@lena018 (TNS V1-V3)  DELETE FROM so_distrib_detail ...
    4,589,031 8,057 569.57 2.85 1734.00 24349.00 8x7g7z2azkbwy java@lena015 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT ES.EMPSKD_ACT_START_TIM...
    3,484,791 7 497,827.29 2.16 359.64 3188.47 6kn1bh485cgfm java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT WRKS_WORK_DATE FROM J...
    2,975,671 8,800,248 0.34 1.85 4960.29 19013.56 0yg00z7gwc8xv java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT * FROM override o WHERE...
    2,758,931 1 2,758,931.00 1.71 189.14 12969.05 2rtppqwfnvucj java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT WRKS_WORK_DATE FROM J...
    1,345,288 1 1,345,288.00 0.84 316.63 1319.96 cg19gczm0t1rq PYW121WA.exe  select unique vctp.EMP...
    1,321,391 0   0.82 302.93 1317.47 6dq9gfc26kmbt PYW121WA.exe  select COUNT(*) from...
    1,273,572 18,765 67.87 0.79 3078.77 8812.06 0crxpb0xurc21 java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  select (fd.fcast_calls + fd.fc...
    1,248,698 6 208,116.33 0.78 287.11 1297.41 250a6k8scn6d1 java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT WRKS_WORK_DATE, EMPL...
    Back to SQL Statistics
    Back to Top
    SQL ordered by Executions
    Total Executions: 128,083,116
    Captured SQL account for 51.0% of Total
    Executions  Rows Processed Rows per Exec CPU per Exec (s) Elap per Exec (s)  SQL Id SQL Module SQL Text
    8,800,248 4,896,274 0.56 0.00 0.00 0yg00z7gwc8xv java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT * FROM override o WHERE...
    8,463,493 2,096 0.00 0.00 0.00 60tk6bna3qwbn java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT /*+INDEX(OVERRIDE IDX_O...
    6,077,148 6,077,148 1.00 0.00 0.00 88vs2qyv0wrr7 java@lena018 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT SEQ_AMXAVS_ID.NEXTVAL F...
    4,854,539 4,854,135 1.00 0.00 0.00 frdva1m6src9p java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  select * from emp_def_lab wher...
    4,520,588 4,840,522 1.07 0.00 0.00 1jgzwf0qkrmnv java@lena018 (TNS V1-V3)  delete from "WORKBRAIN"."AMX_...
    4,205,634 9,720,125 2.31 0.00 0.00 9gj46z0yfjbn6 java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT * FROM so_posn_set_elmt...
    3,834,278 3,834,039 1.00 0.00 0.00 gmgvzfk9nz404 java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT ACT_ID, ACT_NAME, ACT...
    2,985,988 2,674,478 0.90 0.00 0.00 f736f78bg36fz java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT WBT_ID FROM SO_EMPLOYEE...
    2,081,020 2,080,811 1.00 0.00 0.00 brnrwgx8c44zu java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT tcode_udf8 FROM time_co...
    1,779,779 2,531,807 1.42 0.00 0.00 fv9j5aanhvn35 java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  select * from employee_team wh...
    Back to SQL Statistics
    Back to Top
    SQL ordered by Parse Calls
    Total Parse Calls: 42,958,894
    Captured SQL account for 65.4% of Total
    Parse Calls Executions  % Total Parses SQL Id SQL Module SQL Text
    6,077,150 6,077,148 14.15 88vs2qyv0wrr7 java@lena018 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT SEQ_AMXAVS_ID.NEXTVAL F...
    4,205,421 4,205,634 9.79 9gj46z0yfjbn6 java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT * FROM so_posn_set_elmt...
    3,834,191 3,834,278 8.93 gmgvzfk9nz404 java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT ACT_ID, ACT_NAME, ACT...
    1,603,096 2,081,020 3.73 brnrwgx8c44zu java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT tcode_udf8 FROM time_co...
    982,185 982,187 2.29 4m7m0t6fjcs5x    update seq$ set increment$=:2,...
    902,759 906,293 2.10 6cvn595prdbtf java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT wbt_id FROM employee_te...
    821,077 1,779,779 1.91 fv9j5aanhvn35 java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  select * from employee_team wh...
    681,828 681,857 1.59 f0jjm3ky3kawn java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT * FROM EMPLOYEE_BALANCE...
    548,293 912,139 1.28 dmw686hrngaxf java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  SELECT * FROM override WHERE o...
    345,765 345,765 0.80 ftj9uawt4wwzb    select condition from cdef$ wh...
    Back to SQL Statistics
    Back to Top
    SQL ordered by Sharable Memory
    No data exists for this section of the report.
    Back to SQL Statistics
    Back to Top
    SQL ordered by Version Count
    Only Statements with Version Count greater than 20 are displayed
    Version Count  Executions  SQL Id SQL Module SQL Text
    163 38,796 ax51zndhagcxh java@lena018 (TNS V1-V3)  UPDATE work_summary SET wr...
    122 444 7pgr0hyg72xps java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  INSERT INTO employee_schedule ...
    100 42,367 3dg7u9t51sszw java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  UPDATE employee_schedule SET ...
    41 131,055 c1zdcc94svbpb java@lena014 (TNS V1-V3)  UPDATE override SET EMP_ID =...
    {code}
    Thank you.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

  • User I/O and db file parallel read is high in AWR report

    Hi,
    We have one performance issue during a job execution.
    From the awr report we have identified one query with a table having millions of records causing problems and then we had also fine tuned that query by changing it's code and by using the optmizer hints. It is being executed in plsql batches. After fine tuning, On the first batch execution(first 5000 records) the query is taking only 5 mins, but on the consecutive batches it is consuming more time( more than 30 mins).
    From the awr report I got the statistics as
    Release : 11.2.0.2.0
    Instance Efficiency Percentages (Target 100%)
    Buffer Nowait %: 100.00 Redo NoWait %: 100.00
    Buffer Hit %: 85.44 In-memory Sort %: 99.98
    Library Hit %: 99.76 Soft Parse %: 99.15
    Execute to Parse %: 88.91 Latch Hit %: 100.00
    Parse CPU to Parse Elapsd %: 87.32 % Non-Parse CPU: 98.65
    The buffer hit % is good. On each batch execution it is taking different set of records.
    Top 5 Timed Foreground Events
    Event Waits Time(s) Avg wait (ms) % DB time Wait Class
    db file parallel read 120,485 42,540 353 89.60 User I/O
    DB CPU 3,794 7.99
    db file sequential read 145,074 606 4 1.28 User I/O
    db file scattered read 70,030 556 8 1.17 User I/O
    direct path write temp 12,423 21 2 0.04 User I/O
    So the I/O is our main concern since that query contains one table with millions of records.
    Host CPU (CPUs: 24 Cores: 24 Sockets: 4)
    Load Average Begin Load Average End %User %System %WIO %Idle
    1.40 1.45 0.6 0.3 3.7 99.0
    Load is also normal.
    From the Time model statistics , sql execute elapsed time is 98.27% of db time and only 7.99% is that of DB CPU.
    Memory Statistics
    Begin End
    Host Mem (MB): 64,318.0 64,318.0
    SGA use (MB): 30,720.0 30,720.0
    PGA use (MB): 488.2 497.1
    % Host Mem used for SGA+PGA: 48.52 48.54
    Both the size of sga_max_size and sga_target are 32,212,254,720(32gb) bytes and that of
    pga_aggregate target is 629,145,600(600mb)
    from this it is evident that the memory is still available(so increase in memory size is not an option).
    The sql statistics for that query shows like that
    Elapsed Time (s) Executions Elapsed Time per Exec (s) %Total %CPU %IO SQL Id SQL Text
    44,950.03 55 817.27 94.67 6.99 94.72 79dgmrxh4kv74 SELECT /*+ index(cdr_data cdr_...
    I can't understand whether the problem is in the database side or with the query?
    If the problem is with the query, then how it has been executed in 5 mins for the first batch ?
    (all the batches are having 5000 records each).
    And how can we reduce the db file parallel read ?
    Your valuable advice will be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks in advance
    Manoj Kumar N

    "db file parallel read" is likely to be associated with something like index prefetching.
    See:
    http://www.freelists.org/post/oracle-l/RE-Calculating-LIOs,11
    http://aprakash.wordpress.com/2012/05/29/index-range-scan-and-db-file-scattered-read-as-session-wait-event/
    http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2006/12/15/index-operations/
    Tune the SQL.
    Review the execution plan.
    Check whether the statistics are accurate.
    Review whether the index hint (and others that we can't see) is appropriate.

  • Negative Values of Library Cache Hit Ratio in AWR Report

    Hi all,
    We are getting Negative values of Library cache hit ratio in AWR Report of 11g(11.2.0.3) with Solaris[tm] OE (64-bit).
    Please suggest us why it shows negative value.
    Instance Efficiency Percentages (Target 100%)
    Buffer Nowait %: 99.87 Redo NoWait %: 99.99
    Buffer Hit %: 92.17 In-memory Sort %: 100.00
    Library Hit %: -3,321.23 Soft Parse %: 81.95
    Execute to Parse %: 92.88 Latch Hit %: 95.11
    Parse CPU to Parse Elapsd %: 87.25 % Non-Parse CPU: 81.39
    Regards,
    Madhan
    Edited by: user12078989 on Jul 25, 2012 7:40 AM

    Hi Aman,
    DB not restarted during this time.. we don't have production access. we will get awr report automatically from customer daily. also i am getting issue in our local environment v$rowcache view gets values is negative for dc_users and dc_tablespaces parameter may be it's related production issue...

  • Oracle 9.2.0.8 and AWR report?

    Does anyone know if 9.2.0.8 supports AWR?
    Thanks in advance!

    Thanks! I figured it may since I have also seen that it now support Automatic Memory Management, which was also introduced in 10g v1.
    Thanks

Maybe you are looking for

  • Please help me with the logic

    Hi All, I have a number on the selection-screen.I need to prepare a structure with fields equal to the number provided on the selection screen.please help me with it. Thanks in advance, kushagra sharma

  • How to split Frieght Amount in Purchase Order Document.

    Dear Expert, I want to print Frieght cost  one by one in purchase order document. For Example : list Frieght set up below 1. Packing & forward.--500 (Frieght cod is 5) 2. Transport - 300 (Frieght code  1) Please help me how to Design in PLD (end repo

  • Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong? (Custom Buttons)

    I have a project where I've created a custom buttonbase which has a custom skin. Create a button that uses the custom skin which extends the custom button base the first time the button is used it doesn't work the way I would expect. Here's what happ

  • Form builder include text special character not printed

    Hi, When you are editing an so10-text, you can add a SAP-symbol, (a large square by example) resulting in a number between brackets. The form builder does not recognize this as a symbol. It prints the number with brackets. How do you solve this in Fo

  • Extract only SP 16 SRM notes for SRM 550

    Hi all Hiw can i extract SP 16 notes only from sap market place related to SRM muthu