'BAPI_POEC_CREATE' function doesn't work with extended classic scenario

Hi everybody.
Antecedents:
We are working in an extended classic scenario.
When we create a Purchase Order via ITS in SRM, the system works ok, the PO is replicated in the ERP system.
But when we execute “BAPI_POEC_CREATE” function module in order to create a PO in SRM, no message are available in the application monitor, but the PO is not replicated in the ERP system.
Both exampled were created with exactly same data (partners, items, categories, accounts, …)
Moreover when we modify the second PO created via ITS, the systems doesn’t show any error message, we can order our PO again without error, but the PO isn’t replicate in the ERP system.
1. We executed “BAPI_POEC_GETDETAIL” function module, and there is only a difference between POs, E_PO_STATUS table.
PO created by transaction has 8 entries:
       I1009 X
       I1015 X
       I1021
       I1038
       I1039 X
       I1043
       I1080 X
       I1180
And PO created by BAPI has 5 entries:
       I1015 X
       I1021
       I1038
       I1043
       I1180
2. We run “BBP_PD” transaction, and there is only a difference.
PO created by transaction mode shows:
- Message: W BBP_PD 830 Default values have been taken from Vendor PRUEBA10/purchasing organization Área Global Compras (org. compras)
And PO created by BAPI
- Message: No Messages
Could anyone help me with the problem?
Thanks in advance.
Raúl.

Hi Raúl,
this is exact, BAPI_POEC_CREATE is designed to create local PO.
If you want to replicate it to R/3, then you have to change it to an ECS PO.
In BADI BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI, called at the real beginning of BBP_PD_PO_CREATE, you will have to change some data to enable the ECS scenario:
- change header subtype to EP
- change header log system to SRM (keep FI LS as is)
- determine a backend purch group & org
- complete BE fields (be_object_id, be_object_type, don't change be_log_system because it will be determined during the transfer, be_pur_org and be_pur_group will also be determined during the transfer)
- ... and maybe other R/3 relevant fields
Compare both PO one by one, and adapt the gaps.
Rgds
Christophe
PS: please reward points for helpfull answers

Similar Messages

  • SRM 7 : Vendor record replication in backend with Extended Classic Scenario

    Hello,
    We are implementing SRM 7 with Extended Classic Scenario and Supplier Self-registration.
    Can you explain what is to be configured to get the new vendors replicated to the backend?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    It is possible to transfer suppliers to ERP system, if you use 'Supplier registration with ERP' scenario. After registration and acceptance, newly registered suppliers would appear on supplier monitor from where you can transfer them to backend system.
    Check the below link for more details:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/cf/35074152aff323e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
    Regards,
    Sanjeev

  • Reservation with Extended classic scenario

    Hi ;o)
    I'm working at a costumer were we have extended classic scenario. We want to be able to make reservations in the backend if the item is on stock, and we have seen in a solution matrix from SAP that this should be possible.
    The configuration for reservations should be done according to the guides - but no reservations is created when ordering a stock material.
    I was searching on the developer network, and came across a topic, where it was stated that reservations could only be made with classic scenario (or using a BAdI where you switch the extended on and off depending on product category). Do any of you know if this is really a fact?
    Thanks in advance
    Maria Hvenegaard, Denmark

    Hi
    Read this first.
    <u>You can use BBP_CREATE_RES_BACK BADI using Se18 Transaction.
    This BADI You can find in SPRO -> Supplier Rel. Mngmt. -> SRM Server -> Business Add-Ins -> Follow-on document generation -> Reservation in Backend System</u>
    <u>If you want to create reservation, you have first to switch from ECS to classic scenario through BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI then you have to implement BBP_TARGET_OBJTYPE badi to determine the criteria to create a reservation in your backend.</u>
    <u>We need to maintian the customising setings in SPRO Transaction.
    Define objects in Back end systems. Maintain the document type EC or ECPO for Purchase Orders and not for creating reservations. Maintain number ranges (RS) and align the same to R/3 or backend systems. In setting up the org plan in the PPOMA_BBP Transaction, the attribute for resevation - Attribute BWA should be maintained too, if reservations are to be created in the backend system.
    Movement Type Accounting Object
    201 Cost Center
    221 WBS-Element
    231 Sales Order
    241 Asset
    Example :
    logicalsystemname\201</u>
    <u><b>Maintain the following Settings in the IMG using SPRO Transaction.</b>
    1.For internal Procurement > 1.Always Reservation for Material types Subjected to inv Mgmt
    2.For External Procurement >1.Always purchase Requisition.
    Note -> The plant that you use to create the shopping cart might not be extended to handle inventory management. Select a right plant which is extended to inventory management and you will see a reservation being created.</u>
    Be aware that:
    - with the classic scenario you can create PR, PO and/or Reservations in R/3, but there is no local purchasing document (except the SC), so all functions around the local PO will not be possible.
    - with the extended classic scenario, you can only create PO in the backend, but a local PO exists in SRM.
    Concerning GR, it is possible to make it in SRM for both scenario
    Hope this will help.
    Please reward suitable points, incase it suits your requirements.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Javascript-function doesn't work with user nobody

    I recently started to use AJAX with APEX. I defined a Application Process and a Javascript-Function which fetch values from a Lookup-Table into some fields, which works great. Except when I make the page available public (user nobody), then it doesn't work anymore.

    Hello,
    Do you have page 0 (zero) in your application? If you are using page 0 as a parameter in your htmldb_Get function, the page must be public (http://htmldb.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=11933:63).
    Regards,
    Arie.

  • HP Digital Filing function doesn't work with Mountain Lion....?!

    My HP Officejet L7780 is an All-in-One with a fabulous feature of Direct Digital Filing allowing us to do a digital scan and filing into a folder on my Mac. It is operated entirely from the printer by a single button.
    It works perfectly on my MBP with Snow Leopard.
    On my new MBP with Mountain Lion this function does not work - (the printer cannot find the computer, or says it is not turned on or it is not accessible..) Applecare cannot explain it - the Apple Genius does not know how to fix it - HP washes their hands saying the printer is no longer Supported.....
    I have a perfectly good printer/scanner/copier/fax - and i can still call a scan from my computer - but i can no longer send a file from the printer.
    I've done all the software downloads, uninstalled and reinstalled all the MAC-OS and Printer software, 3 times - looked throughout the HP website for udpate drivers to work with OS10.8
    Does anyone know how to fix it, please ?

    Hi ShlomiL,
    Thanks - i'm sure your answer is correct, it is totally consistent with the observed facts. but i ask myself WHY, oh WHY does Apple do such a short-sighted move to cut off legacy apps or legacy hardware forcing people either to not adopt their latest hardware/software, or waste totally good office equipment which is still perfectly workable.
    As luck would have it, i have an MBP with OS10.6 for my business - i can do a Direct Digital file scan to it perfectly OK but my new Retina MBP which i use for all my personal finances, taxes etc is the one i want to use with the printer, at home.
    I can get stuff from the scanner to my home MBP but have to do that poor workaround - and i refuse to be forced to trash a perfectly good 4 year old printer just to please some software re-designer.
    Is there a work-around (hack ?) where i can download the old SMB file/driver into Mountain Lion and replace the SMBX version which comes with the new OS, please ?

  • Evaluate function doesn't work with Static values

    Hi All,
    I have been trying to call a evaluate function and have been successfully in calling it..but i face problem when i pass any static values to it...
    For eg
    when i try calling the function using one of the columns...it works fine
    Evaluate('dbo.Hello(%1)',"Dim table_name"."Department" )
    the function normally changes it to upper case.so i get all the value in the column in department in upper case.
    but when i call any static value like
    Evaluate('dbo.Hello(%1)','hello') it throws the following error..
    [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 43119] Query Failed: [nQSError: 42015] Cannot function ship the following expression: Evaluate( dbo.Hello(%1),'hello') . (HY000)
    Can any one please help me in this
    Regards
    SK

    Which version of Jdev are you using? What are the results you are getting?

  • To_number function doesn't work with apex_collections in where clause

    One of my applications I have been using apex_collections and to_number function
    in the where clause. Since we upgraded apex to version 3.0.1 , it gives the invalid number error.
    Is this a bug in the new Version.
    I had to re-write the logic to fix the application.

    Can you show us that code? An example on apex.oracle.com where we can see the error would be great.
    Scott
    P.S. Please tell us your first name and put it into your handle and/or profile to help us.

  • SAP eSourcing with SRM Extended Classic Scenario

    Hi Team,
    We are using ECC 6.0 with eSourcing. Currently we use SRM 5.0 with Classic Scenario.
    Now we are planning an upgrade from SRM 5.5 to SRM 7.0 and want to do the Extended Classic Scenario. This will help us to do additional functionalities of SRM.
    eSourcing can be used for Strategic RFx and CLM functionalities.
    SRM can be used for SC, Operational Sourcing and PO. We can also use the SRM-SUS Scenario for PO confirmation and Invoices.
    Have any one used eSourcing with SRM Extended Classic? In that case, please provide some light into how to use all these application to better streamline the overall Source to Procure strategy.
    Also, do you think Classic is the way to go or Extended Classic is better? Any documents or pictures are greatly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Jogy

    Hi
    SAP provide standard integration b/w ECC and Esourcing/ CLM (PR (both inbound and outbound). However in case you decide to go with extended classic scenario,you might need e Sourcing/ CLM integration with SRM (since PO would be created in SRM) which is not provided out of the box by SAP. However custom interface (based on flat file transfer) can be built b/w SAP SRM and e Sourcing.
    MM-SUS scenario is not much different from EBP-SUS scenario in terms of functionality.
    Regards
    Mudit Saini

  • ASN in Extended Classic Scenario with SUS

    Hi SRMer?
    Is it possible to create an ASN in SUS with Extended Classic Scenario (ECS)?
    OSS note 543544 mention that the scenario is limited for document types Purchase Order, Purchase Order Response and Change Order. Confirmations and invoices are not possible. There is no indication on ASNs.
    Any help will be appreciated.
    Regards.

    Hi
    Please go through these links ->
    SUS-MM Confirmation without ASN
    Re: Details on ASN
    The specified item was not found.
    SUS  ASN - mandatory field
    ASN Confirmation not created,
    Clarifications on EBP-SUS and MM-SUS Scenario
    Re: SUS-MM scenario with "POR (order ack.)" and ASN for free text
    Creating custom field in ASN screen of SRM SUS
    SUS Invoice
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Limit items on extended classic scenario.

    Hi everybody.
    We are working in SRM 4.0 with extended classic scenario.
    We are testing limit items (not service items), but I can not understand the limit item functionality.
    In SC, we can assign contracts form limit items. But when we create PO from the SC, there is not any relationship between PO and contract. Moreover when I create a PO (limit item) from null, I can not assign any contract (field is not available).
    In the other hand, in SC (limit item), I can select Follow-Up Actions as ‘Confirmation and Invoice’ or ‘Invoice’. If I select ‘Confirmation and Invoice’, when I create a PO, ECC return me a message error, because in ECC, good receives are not allowed for PO with limit item category.
    So, I have some questions:
    1. Can I use limit items in PO with contract reference?
    2. If yes, how can I do it? If not, what is the tab contracts functionality in SC with limit items?
    3. What is the functionality to allow confirmations in SC with limit items?
    4. Is there any documentation about limit item functionality?
    Thanks and regards.
    Raúl Moncada.

    Hello,
    As far as I know, this is a technical limitation. A work around would affect other functionalities.
    Note 1358679 corrected such issue.
    Regards,
    Ricardo

  • PO output for Extended classic Scenario from the R/3 backend

    Hi,
    1) Does the PO output (ignoring the config maintained in SRM server 5.5 for the output) through R/3 backend is standard or it is mandatory to give local outputs from SRM only incase of Extended classic scenario?
    Regards,
    DV

    Hi Anil,
    We are working on extended classic scenario with SRM 5.0 & ECC6.0.
    Please explain how we can take "PO output for Extended classic Scenario from the R/3 backend ". 
    Please send the related document to [email protected]
    Thanks in advance
    Ashutosh

  • ASN for extended classic scenario

    Hello all,
    we have SRM with extended classic scenario (EBP-MM),
    is it possible to use ASN (shipping notification) functionality in our system ?
    Kind regards,
    Arthur

    Hi
    ASN can be created by the vendor in SUS system for that XI mapping is required. ASn can be created in SUS by any vendor users. I guess it's not possible with ECS.
    Please check the SAP Consulting Note 1026638 GR Output Integration with MM-SUS Scenario for R/3 <= 47
    You need to have functional background for this:
    To create an ASN against PO or SA release:
    1. you need to compulsarily put how much qty you are sending against the reqd. qty(shown by PO / SA )
    2. dispatch vehicle no. (optional)
    3. road challan no. (optional)
    4. one more optional entry ( sorry I forgot)
    Useful related pointers ->
    Re: how does the GR get into SUS---MM-SUS Sceanario
    ASN in Extended Classic Scenario with SUS
    SUS ASN & Invoice
    The specified item was not found.
    Do let me know.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Extended Classic Scenario Pricing issue, can I over come by using SRM-MDM?.

    Hi SRM GURU'S,
    I am using  ECC 6.0, SRM 5.5, SUS, LAC, cFolders and SRM-MDM with Extended Classic Scenario.
    My Question is : In case of Extended classic scenario, there is issue with Pricing and conditions. Is there any possibility to overcome this issue by using SRM-MDM. Or do I have to go for IPC. My client has not brought IPC. I have to cover Pricing with the above components.
    Anyone suggest me, how to proceed.  Thanks in Advance. Awaiting for quick response.
    Thanks & Regards,
    John.

    Hi Masa,
    We can maintain Price and conditions as a record in CCM for Particular Material or Vendor. When you add that record to shopping cart it will update. I mean, If the provision is available in MDM, I don't want to use the Two components for same functionality.
    If I use IPC, Is there separate license for that. What else need to be updated to use IPC (Patches etc).
    If you have IPC configuration material, could you please share with me? How to bridge the SRM Conditions and ECC Conditions?
    Please clearly give me details.  I really appreciate you.
    Regards,
    John.

  • PO error - extended classic scenario

    Hi Guys,
    I'm using SRM 5.0 with extended classic scenario...
    During creation of the purchase order locally (in SRM) I got the "error in process" status.
    My means of T-code RZ20 I got the following info to ithis error:
    context:B2B Procurement
    object name:Purchase Order
    short name: Backend application errors
    status: Active
    Alert text: PO 700..1: Call of a method or kernel Method that has not been implemented
    using Transaction BBP_PD I got the following status:
    Status: I1080
    Description: in transfer to execution system
    Do you have any idea what should I do in order to resolve this outstanding issue?
    many thanks in advance for your help.
    regards,
    Piotrek

    Hi
    Go to transaction - <b>SPAM</b> to get all the required Patch levels and other required system version details.
    <b>Meanwhile, try the following SAP OSS Notes as well -></b>
    <u>Note 508972 - Error during transfer of extended purchase orders
    Note 881650 - Duplicate transfer/output of the purchase order
    PO status in " error In Process ".
    Error in Transfer Process (Urgent )
    FOLLOW ON DOCUMENT NOT CREATED ( ERROR IN PROCESS)</u>
    Hope this will help.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • SRM: Extended Classic scenario: Request your help.

    Hi Guru's,
    We are implementing the EXTENDED CLASSIC SCENARIO in our project. kindly request your help.
    in our project the SRM box is :  G3OSBSR102.
    R/3 backend Box is :   RCHSBR3142.
    Now when i create a shopping cart it should create the Purchase order In SRM( G3OSBSR102) and also copy the created purcahse order in teh backend system : RCHSBR3142.
    The issue here is which Logical system should be populated in the field at item level when creating the shopping cart :BE_LOG_SYSTEM.
    1) In this field: BE_LOG_SYSTEM.
    If i populate the SRM local: G3OSBSR102., then it will consider the Business object type as : BUS2201and creates the local Po but while transfering this local created document(PO) to R/3 system is loosing the Logical system at the item level of the PO.
    If i populate this field at the item level via DEBUGG mode then system is sucessfull in transferring the document to R/3.
    2)  In this field: BE_LOG_SYSTEM.
    If i populate the SRM local: RCHSBR3142, then it will consider the Business object type as : BUS2012 and creates the purchase order in R/3 system and will not create teh local purchase order.
    Kindly request your help for any further settings if i did miss.Appreciate your help in this regards.
    Many Thanks,
    Prasad NN.

    Dear Prasad,
    To work on Extended Classic Scenario, you just have to maintain the following configuration in SPRO:
    >SAP Supplier Relationship Management
    >SRM Server
      >Cross-Application Basic Settings
       >Activate Extended Classic Scenario
    Check the flag "Extended Classic Scenario Active".
    You dont have to manipulate "BE_LOG_SYSTEM" field to choose your scenario.
    Regards
    Thiago Salvador

Maybe you are looking for

  • After installing 4.7 the dispatcher is getting stopped

    hi gurus, i am installing 4.7 after installation i got the message like successfully complted , when iam trying to start the MMC but the dispatcher is getting stopped please check this log - trc file: "dev_disp", trc level: 1, release: "620" Tue Jan

  • Regarding SAP XI

    Dear All , I have few queries : 1) do I need to install SAP XI on Web AS machine or on a different machine . 2)What is the hardware configuration for development & for production server of SAP XI . 3)What are the prerequisites for installing SAP XI .

  • Need help regarding Photoshop Album Starter Edition 3.0

    Thanks in advance for helping me. When I got a new camera about 4 years ago, it came with this software. I loaded it up, but never used it. I normally just create a new folder on my desktop and click and drag the shots from the computer to the deskto

  • Cocoon in OAS 4.0.8.2

    I'm setting up the OAS in our office without problem. I'm trying to install cocoon inside the OAS but it don't work well. Is possible setting up cocoon 1.7.4 in OAS 4.0.8.2 ? Have someone this tools working fine together?

  • How to completely uninstall AnyConnect ?

    We are seeing an increasing number of problems where AnyConnect starts having problems on individual machines (mostly users home machines) where they wont connect to our ASA.  In the past, I have been able to uninstall and reinstall AnyConnect to res