Basic Default Route Question

Hi,
I have a very basic question I wanted to run by everyone to make sure my understanding is correct.
Setup:
Basic config, router with two interfaces and a single default route.
hostname RTR1
interface Ethernet0/0
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
interface Ethernet0/1
ip address 1.1.2.1 255.255.255.0
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 1.1.2.2
add -> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.10.10.1
If I add a default route (currently in a telnet session coming through 1.1.2.2 to get to RTR1) to a gateway that is NOT locally connected nothing will happen, correct? The router won't try to load balance my traffic since the second gateway is not directly connected and reachable, correct?
Next, if I change the IP address on e0/1 to 10.10.10.2/24 then my default route of 1.1.2.2 will no longer be used and my 10.10.10.1 defaut route will become active, correct?
I can then connect using my new IP of 10.10.10.2 assuming all routing is working on my new default gateway, correct?
Basically, I'm making sure my understanding of the default gateway route not being used unless it is accessible is valid. If it is, it will load balance traffic across up to 6 of them.
Please comment or correct if my understanding is incorrect.
Thanks.

Jamie
I believe that most of your understanding is ok especially about not load sharing over the routes as defined. I checked it on a router and only the default route with a reachable next hop is inserted into the routing table. Both static default routes are in the config but only one is in the routing table.
HTH
Rick

Similar Messages

  • Basic Vlan routing question

    I am connecting a 4503 to a 2950.  I have native Vlan 1 between them on the trunk.  On that vlan 1 the subnet is 172.16.138.0.  The default gateway on the 2950 is 172.16.138.1.  There are devices attached to the 2950 that are all subnet 172.16.98.0.  I need to be able to get those devices to talk to the 4503. The only vlan I had on the 2950 is vlan 1.   I made another vlan on the 2950 but when I try to no sh it I get kicked out of the switch.     Any ideas?              

    The 2950 is a L2 switch and can only have a single vlan interface for management. When you're creating a new vlan, it's kicking you out because the 4500 doesn't have the vlan configured to support the new vlan that you're creating. That being said, you should be able to do the following to route your other subnet:
    If the 4500 vlan 1 subnet is 172.16.138.0/24, and you're wanting to create 172.16.98.0/24, you'll need to do it on the 4500.
    4500: (Assuming you want to create vlan 10)
    vlan 10
    int vlan 10
    ip address 172.16.98.1 255.255.255.0
    Then you'll need to trunk the port that leads to the 2950 - assume that's fa0/1
    int fa0/1
    switchport trunk encaps dot1q
    switchport mode trunk
    Then on the 2950, you'll need to keep your vlan 1 interface:
    int vlan 1
    ip address 172.16.138.2 255.255.255.0
    ip default-gateway 172.16.138.1 <-- this is to get to the management vlan interface above from another subnet
    Then create your vlan that matches on the 4500 (vlan 10)
    vlan 10
    Trunk the port that leads to the 4500 (assuming f0/1)
    int fa0/1
    switchport trunk encaps dot1q
    switchport mode trunk
    Then the ports that you want on vlan 10, you'll put in the vlan:
    int range fa1/2-48
    switchport mode access
    switchport access vlan 10
    Your hosts will use 172.16.98.1 as a default gateway, but that traffic will be routed at the 4500 series switch. The 2950 cannot do the routing for you, but it can carry the vlan information that you need.
    HTH,
    John
    *** Please rate all useful posts ***

  • How to set the default route on a RVS4000 to point to a gateway in the LAN

    Hi
    The dialog in the RVS4000 for static routes does not allow to set the default route to point to a gateway in the LAN. Clearly this is either a bug or a feature of the web-interface and not a restriction of the box, which runs some kind of linux. So my question is there a way around this problem rather then defining routes to n-class A networks to cover the internet? Like a terminal access to set the default route?
    Thanks and cheers
    Frank

    Hi David
    Thanks for your reply. I did already the first part and it seems that I presumed wrongly that the RVS4000 can be used as a layer 3 switch, instead it is only a 1-port gateway. Not that there is a technical limitation from the hardware or the OS of the box. It does layer 3 routing e.g. for its VLAN's. The only point to stop it from having the capability which I expect from something called router is to set its default route to the right gateway independant which port might be connected. The reason why I want a LAN port pointing to the gateway and do not use the WAN port without firewall is of course the VLAN capability of the LAN ports. The idea of the RVS is to bundle two nets, including the one where the gateway is on, and send it to a WAP4410N box, which nicely makes them wireless with different SSID's. Actually I have two ports connetced to the core network, if I am forced to have only the WAN port connected to the core, due to this artificial limitation, I would have to reconfigure a bit. Therefore I try to find an easier solution setting the route by "hand".
    Cheers Frank

  • Using ACE RHI to inject a default route

    I think I posted this onto the wrong Forum. Anyone able to advise here?
    SteveK.
    Posted by: stevek1 - Network Administrator, Dept Natural Resources and Mines
    Apr 18, 2008, 12:04am PST
    Hi Folks,
    I need to provide internal devices with active-active access to our clustered firewall which sits across 2 data centres.
    I need to allow internal hosts to reach external/unknown networks via a default route.
    We have ACE modules in our internal network aggregation 6513s at each site.
    I aim to achieve this using RHI...ie...device at site 1 reaches the internet via firewall at site 1, device at site 2 reaches internet via firewall at site 2 (due to better route). If the firewall is inaccessible from site 2, ACE at site 2 removes the route from the MSFC using RHI and site 2 device traffic is re-routed to the site 1 exit point.
    Has anyone out there done this before?
    Regards, Steve.
    | Outline | Subscribe | E-Mail this Message
    Replied by: stevek1 - Network Administrator, Dept Natural Resources and Mines - Apr 20, 2008, 6:48pm PST
    Hi Folks,
    It's Steve here again. I haven't had a response to my query as yet, but basically I need to know the validity of using ACE RHI to inject a default route as opposed to a host route.
    Can anyone please advise?
    Best Wishes, Steve.

    Thanks so much for your response Zahoor.
    The solution you have provided is more complicated than I had in mind. For example we had not intended using FWSM (we don't have these modules). I just want to use our existing ACEs at each Data Centre to provide the injection of a default route to our internal EIGRP process based on the result of a probe to our Checkpoint FW. What do you think?
    Steve.

  • Inject BGP Default Routes into Multiple VRF before Best Path Selection

    Hello, 
    I have the following setup:
    Multiple Border Routers with eBGP sessions to external AS. We receive a default route from this multiple AS to keep the Table manageable. We noticed an important part of our traffic was been SW routed instead of CEF when we had the Full Internet table. Router Resources came to the ground when we changed to a default. 
    Now I want to separate this default routes into different VRF. Attached is the Diagram. 
    My question is,  the multiple default route all go into the BGP Table. The BGP table then select the best route and place it on the RIB and then to the FIB. 
    I want to redistribute the different Route on the BGP table prior to the Best path selection algorithm and placed on the RIB. 
    How can I achieve this?

    Hi,
    Redistribution of multiple routes to same prefix is not possible. Even if you have configured BGP multipath and all different bgp routes got installed into routing table, during redistribution only route will be redistributed. 
    Also would like to understand the requirement of redistributing multiple BGP routes in to IGP. As per your diagram, 3 different eBGP sessions are on three different routers, so you can prefer eBGP route over iBGP received from other routers and can distribute eBGP route to IGP from each router. Thus you will have three different default routes in to IGP in core.
    Please don't forget to rate this post if it has been helpful
    - Akash

  • BGP default route advertisement - change preference

    hi guys,
    I would appreciate some assistance here. We have a primary head office & a DR site. Routers at both sites connect to our carrier for an IP VPN service using BGP. BGP configs on each router advertise a default route 0.0.0.0.
       #sh ip bgp neighbors x.x.x.x advertised-routes
          BGP table version is 358, local router ID is x.x.x.x
          Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
                  r RIB-failure, S Stale
          Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
          Originating default network 0.0.0.0
    Issue is, some of our remote sites prefer the DR router path for traffic destined to internet.
    We are advertising multiple default routes to our carrier, and based on feedback from carrier, route with lowest MED is preferred.
    This brings me to what i need to change from my side. Need to change the route preference so that from our remote offices, only the route to head office is preferred with DR site the least preferred route. I know there are multliple ways of doing this, however keen to get input from the experts out there.
    DR site router has this BGP config currently applied:
       router bgp XXXXX
        bgp log-neighbor-changes
        redistribute connected
        redistribute ospf 1 match internal external 1 external 2
        neighbor x.x.x.x remote-as XXXX
        neighbor x.x.x.x default-originate
        neighbor x.x.x.x soft-reconfiguration inbound
        neighbor x.x.x.x route-map IMPORT-POLICY in
        neighbor x.x.x.x route-map OPI-route-advertisement out
        default-information originate
    Removing the  "neighbor x.x.x.x default-originate" is not an option, as we need to have the ability to failover to DR at any point.
    Thanks in advance & if you need any further info pls advise.
    Rama

    Hi Milan,
    Thanks. Answers below:
    Does it provide an MPLS backbone to you? YES
    Are you using the same AS number on all your sites or different ones? Same AS
    Any way, what about advertising the default route from your DR site with the site AS number prepended several times (5 times, e.g.)? That's the thing I am struggling to understand as the route-map OPI-route-advertisement already has it prepended 2 times. Shouldn't that be enough to influence which route is least preferred?
    route-map OPI-route-advertisement permit 20
     match ip address prefix-list xxx default-route
     set as-path prepend XXXXX XXXXX
    If your provider would permit that and hasn't configured his routers to ignore the AS_PATH length (as him a question), it should make the default route advertised from your DR less preferred within your backbone. Will ask.
    Given this, any other thoughts/questions?
    Thanks, Rama

  • Two quick VLAN routing questions

    lets say I have a L3 switch routing 4 VLANs
    VLAN 1 is 192.168.10.0/24, the switch's virtual interface is 192.168.10.254 inside this vlan
    VLAN 2 is 192.168.20.0/24, the switch's virtual interface is 192.168.20.254 inside this vlan
    VLAN 3 is 192.168.30.0/24, the switch's virtual interface is 192.168.30.254 inside this vlan
    VLAN 4 is 192.168.40.0/24, the switch's virtual interface is 192.168.40.254 inside this vlan
    there is only one router going out from this switch to the net, and lets say it is in VLAN 1 and it's address is 192.168.10.1
    first question-- inside of the L3 switch I will need to add a default route of 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.1
    so that all traffic not corresponding to a 192.168.x.x address knows where to get out to the net, correct?
    secondly- when configuring that router, is there a difference if I use the following static route:
    192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.254
    instead of
    192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.20.254
    either way, the packet gets to the L3 switch, but in one case it gets there via the VLAN interface inside of VLAN 1, and in the other case, it gets there via the VLAN interface inside of the VLAN for which the traffic is destined anyway. what im trying to figure out is, will this make any difference at all? especially in terms of broadcast packets?
    if it makes no difference, then is it safe to say that the following static route would be optimal?
    192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 192.168.10.254
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Re "firstly". Correct. The L3 switch will route traffic according to its routing table. By default it knows all IP subnets to which it is directly connected to, i.e. all the VLAN subnets. If you have to add a default route manually or not depends on the exact implementation. It may well be that the L3 switch will use the any default gateway for routing which you use for the IP settings of the switch itself (if there is an option in the web interface to set a default gateway). If you cannot define a default gateway on the L3 switch you probably have to add a static route manually. The easiest way should be to check the current routing table and see if there is a default gateway or not.
    Re "secondly". A router can only forward packets to the next hop router. The next hop router must be connected to that router. The route "192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.254" is correct for a router with IP address 192.168.10.1 and subnet mask 255.255.255.0 as 192.168.10.254 is connected to the router. "192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.20.254" is not correct. The router cannot learn the path to a specific subnet 192.168.20.0/255.255.255.0 by using a gateway in that subnet. It is not correct to use that kind of a route and you should not use it even if it might even work (because the router does a plain ARP request to find the MAC address of 192.168.20.254 and your L3 switch will respond to the ARP request even if it is on the internet of 192.168.10.254). The very moment when there would be another router between the 10 and 20 subnets it would not work anymore...
    Re your conclusion: I would recommend to keep four static routes for the existing subnets on the L3 switch instead of putting everything into a larger single subnet which includes a lot of addresses which are not connected there. Technically it works if you only use working IP addresses. But you will see some loops if you send something to 192.168.55.50 or similar. The gateway router will send it to the L3 switch which will send it back to the gateway. They should figure it's a loop but still I would not recommend this kind of setup... Add routes for each of the L3 switch subnet...

  • Can the lifetime of default route (in RA) to the client be renewed?

    The question is that why the "lifetime" for the "ipv6 nd ra" is set maximum 1800sec? It equals to just 30mins.
    If this timer is expired, how to renew the RA to the client? If the renewal is not possible, the client will loss the default
    route information forever. What is the solution for client not loss the default route (except the manual configuration)?
    Thank you

    Hi,
    It's not really a lifetime at such. A non zero value means this router can be considered as a default-gateway.
    From RFC 4861:
    Router Lifetime
                         16-bit unsigned integer.  The lifetime associated
                         with the default router in units of seconds.  The
                         field can contain values up to 65535 and receivers
                         should handle any value, while the sending rules in
                         Section 6 limit the lifetime to 9000 seconds.  A
                         Lifetime of 0 indicates that the router is not a
                         default router and SHOULD NOT appear on the default
                         router list.  The Router Lifetime applies only to
                         the router's usefulness as a default router; it
                         does not apply to information contained in other
                         message fields or options.  Options that need time
                         limits for their information include their own
                         lifetime fields.
    Also please refer to http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipv6/command/reference/ipv6_07.html#wp2360344
    HTH
    Laurent.

  • ASA 5520 - Can not change default route.

    Hi
    My asa is sitting behind a router the next hop from the ASA to the router is 10.0.0.5 I have tried to change the default route to route DMZ 0 0 10.0.0.5  to no availability right now the default route is (S*   0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 [1/0] via 172.16.8.20, Outside) but even if I were to do a "no route Outside 0 0 172.16.8.20" the default route does not disappear when I do a "sh route" command. ant help would be greatly appreciated.

    I apologize for not being clear hopefully this helps. Basically the  default route should be: route DMZ 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.10.10.5, I had to  add a metric of 2 because otherwise it would conflict with the Gateway  of last resort, the interesting part is if I try to remove the current  gateway of last resort then the error I get is  %No matching route to delete and I try to add the new route I get ERROR: Cannot add route entry, conflict with existing routes.
    **"show ip address" output---
    Interface                Name                   IP address      Subnet mask     Method
    GigabitEthernet0/0       Outside               172.22.8.166    255.255.252.0   CONFIG
    GigabitEthernet0/3       DMZ                   10.10.10.16     255.255.255.0   CONFIG
    Management0/0            management      192.168.100.1   255.255.255.0   CONFIG
    GigabitEthernet1/0       Inside                 172.16.0.2      255.255.252.0   CONFIG
    GigabitEthernet1/1       VPN                    X.X.X.X          255.255.255.240 CONFIG
    Current IP Addresses:
    Interface                Name                   IP address      Subnet mask     Method
    GigabitEthernet0/0       Outside               172.22.8.166    255.255.252.0   CONFIG
    GigabitEthernet0/3       DMZ                   10.10.10.16     255.255.255.0   CONFIG
    Management0/0            management      192.168.100.1   255.255.255.0   CONFIG
    GigabitEthernet1/0       Inside                 172.16.0.2      255.255.252.0   CONFIG
    GigabitEthernet1/1       VPN                    X.X.X.X          255.255.255.240 CONFIG
    **"show running-config" output---
    !The DMZ route should be the gateway of last resort
    route DMZ 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.10.10.5 2
    route Outside 10.0.1.0 255.255.255.252 172.22.8.20 1
    route Outside 10.0.2.0 255.255.255.252 172.22.8.20 1
    route Outside 10.0.4.0 255.255.255.252 172.22.8.20 1
    route Outside 10.0.5.0 255.255.255.240 172.22.8.20 1
    route Outside 10.0.6.0 255.255.255.252 172.22.8.20 1
    route Outside 10.0.25.0 255.255.255.0 172.22.8.20 1
    route Outside 10.0.52.0 255.255.255.0 172.22.8.20 1
    route Inside 172.16.0.0 255.255.252.0 172.16.0.3 1
    route Outside 172.16.6.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.6.1 1
    route Outside 172.22.0.0 255.255.0.0 172.22.8.20 10
    route Outside 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 172.22.8.20 255
    route DMZ 192.168.200.0 255.255.255.0 156.108.124.66 1
    **"show route" output ---
    Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
           D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
           N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
           E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
           i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter area
           * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR
           P - periodic downloaded static route
    Gateway of last resort is 172.22.8.20 to network 0.0.0.0
    S    172.16.6.0 255.255.255.0 [1/0] via 172.16.6.1, Outside
                                  [1/0] via 172.22.8.20, Outside
    C    172.16.0.0 255.255.252.0 is directly connected, Inside
    C    172.22.8.0 255.255.252.0 is directly connected, Outside
    S    172.22.0.0 255.255.0.0 [10/0] via 172.22.8.20, Outside
    D    192.168.4.8 255.255.255.252 [90/2178816] via 172.16.0.3, 66:37:21, Inside
    D    192.168.4.9 255.255.255.255 [90/2178816] via 172.16.0.3, 66:37:21, Inside
    S    10.0.2.0 255.255.255.252 [1/0] via 172.22.8.20, Outside
    D    10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 [90/3072] via 172.16.0.3, 66:37:21, Inside
    C    10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 is directly connected, DMZ
    S    10.0.1.0 255.255.255.252 [1/0] via 172.22.8.20, Outside
    S    10.0.6.0 255.255.255.252 [1/0] via 172.22.8.20, Outside
    S    10.0.4.0 255.255.255.252 [1/0] via 172.22.8.20, Outside
    S    10.0.5.0 255.255.255.240 [1/0] via 172.22.8.20, Outside
    S    10.0.25.0 255.255.255.0 [1/0] via 172.22.8.20, Outside
    S    10.0.52.0 255.255.255.0 [1/0] via 172.22.8.20, Outside
    S    192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0
               [255/0] via 172.22.8.20, Outside
    D    192.168.100.0 255.255.255.0 [90/3072] via 172.16.0.3, 66:37:21, Inside
    ! I have tried to remove the route below with the command "no  route Outside 0 0 172.22.8.20" but always get the error %No matching  route to delete
    S*   0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 [1/0] via 172.22.8.20, Outside

  • Manipulate Default route

    Setup: I have 2 PE routers. PE-a and PE-b both connected to CE's(setup with EIGRP)that are advertising default routes to PE-c and currently PE-c is preferring PE-b due to natural iBGP selection process. Currently PE-c is running EIGRP with the CE as well. Is there a way I can manipulate the incoming default route at the VRF address family level on PE-c so that it would prefer PE-a. Basically I'm trying to force PE-c to prefer PE-a even though it prefers PE-b. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!

    Thanks for the info but I was wondering if you can assist with a different scenario. If I had another location for example on PE-d and I wanted that location to use PE-a as a default gateway and PE-c to use PE-b, with the metric being that PE-b is the preferred route, how would I go about manipulating the PE-d router to choose PE-a instead of PE-b. Sorry I'm jumping around a lot but I'm basically trying to figure out how I can config my PE to pick and choose which default route to take manually instead of dynamically. I still need the dynamic part there just incase there is a failure but the manual part is there to have options. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!

  • WRVS4400N default route

    Hello!
    I bought a WRVS400N v2 to be used as an access point.
    Currently it is hooked up on my switch via a trunk port and is able to communicate with my gateway.
    Whenever I try to access an IP subnet other then the local IP address of the WRVS, I get a network unreachable error.
    To fix this for my local networks, I added the appropriate static route to cover my local LANs and that seems to work now.
    I tried to add route 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 using the web interface for internet access, but somehow it does not recognize this as a default route (quad zero!?).
    Does anybody know how I can set the default gateway in this router? Maybe, but hopefully not, I have to use the WAN port to create some kind of uplink and use one of the LAN ports to connect using the trunk port and route traffic for the clients over the WAN port :-)
    Hopefully someone knows how!
    Thanks,
    René

    Hi Rene, thank you for using our forum, my name is Johnnatan I am part of the Small business Support community. In this case is impossible to assign a default route to the router because the gateway address is the same as the router. This kind of devices doesn´t need to set a default route. You also have to keep in mind the router and gateway mode.
    I hope you find this answer useful,
    *Please mark the question as Answered or rate it so other users can benefit from it"
    Greetings,
    Johnnatan Rodriguez Miranda.
    Cisco Network Support Engineer.

  • HSRP EIGRP TWO DEFAULT ROUTES

    Hi,
    I have a question concerning EIGRP routing on a L3 switch behind a HSRP HA pair of routers which connect to a WAN.
    HSRP is operating as should be and when R1 fails, or an interface thereon, R2 becomes the active. All good.
    However there are now two default routes in the route table on the L3 switch. One is routing traffic to the R2 real IP which is expected but also there is the old default route to R1's real IP.
    Using EEM we can overcome this but is there another simpler method to prevent this occurring?
    Thanks
    F

    F
    If i understand correcty your LAN interfaces on the routers ie. the ones connecting to the L3 switch are running HSRP and you are also running EIGRP between the L3 switch and the routers.
    If so you wouldn't usually have both solutions in use ie. you either -
    1) use HSRP and point the default route on the L3 switch to the HSRP VIP
    or
    2) use EIGRP between the routers and the L3 switch. If a router or interface fails it should stop advertising the default route to the L3 switch.
    However that sounds like it is not happening which suggests the default routes are not coming from the WAN.
    So where are the default routes in EIGRP on the L3 switch coming from ?
    Jon

  • Losing IPv6 default route

    Hi,
    I've started seeing a problem after upgrading to Yosemite that I lose the IPv6 default route after a while on my MacBook Air. I can restore it but running
    sudo ipconfig set en0 automatic-v6
    in the terminal, but after a while it disappears again. I still have all the IPs and link level routes, just not the default one. Does anyone recognize this problem or know of a workaround? I suppose it could be something with my network setup, but I've never had problems with this before and haven't changed anything except OS version recently. My router is running OpenWRT (barrier breaker pre-release).
    Nothing really relevant in syslog around that time:
    Oct 23 12:03:02 Pers-Air discoveryd[23138] : Basic DNSResolver  dropping message because it doesn't match the one sent Port:0 MsgID:621
    Oct 23 12:03:02 Pers-Air discoveryd[23138] : Basic DNSResolver  dropping message because it doesn't match the one sent Port:0 MsgID:26048
    Oct 23 12:03:02 Pers-Air discoveryd[23138] : Basic DNSResolver  dropping message because it doesn't match the one sent Port:0 MsgID:9984
    Oct 23 12:03:05 Pers-Air kernel[0]: process Google Chrome[1485] caught causing excessive wakeups. Observed wakeups rate (per sec): 158; Maximum permitted wakeups rate (per sec): 150; Observation period: 300 seconds; Task lifetime number of wakeups: 7578605
    Oct 23 12:03:05 Pers-Air com.apple.xpc.launchd[1] (com.apple.ReportCrash[34206]): Endpoint has been activated through legacy launch(3) APIs. Please switch to XPC or bootstrap_check_in(): com.apple.ReportCrash
    Oct 23 12:03:05 Pers-Air ReportCrash[34206]: Invoking spindump for pid=1485 wakeups_rate=158 duration=285 because of excessive wakeups
    Oct 23 12:03:11 Pers-Air spindump[1470]: Saved wakeups_resource.diag report for Google Chrome version 38.0.2125.104 (2125.104) to /Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/Google Chrome_2014-10-23-120311_Pers-MacBook-Air.wakeups_resource.diag
    Oct 23 12:03:14 Pers-Air discoveryd[23138]: Basic NATTServer Got control URL: http://XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:5000/ctl/IPConn (ip)
    This is very annoying since I rely on IPv6 for some of my work connections, so I really do need some kind of fix.

    Try running 'nettop -m route' in a terminal window and look for the default IPv6 routes. These are mine for ethernet and wi-fi:
        default -> en0 -> fe80::200:ff:fe00:0%en0
        default -> en1 -> fe80::200:ff:fe00:0%en1
    The problem I see is that the default route keeps disappearing for a short time. If you are also running a ping6 at the time you will see:
        ping6: sendmsg: No route to host
    I'm using a Cisco RV220W router. Each network interface default route drops for a short time and there is no particular timing or other indicator why. This is all happening while the IPv4 network is rock solid. I'm seeing this in Mac OS X 10.9.5.

  • IPv6 default route

    Hi,
    I had border router, ipv6 BGP peering to upstream ISP and it learned about 5K of IPv6 BGP routes.
    Internally I had another router iBGP peering with border router. But I do not want this internal router learned full ipv6 routes.
    I would like it learn ipv6 route from 1st level upstream only and default route.
    Question is what is IPv6 default route to internet ? for ipv4 it is 0.0.0.0/0
    It is ::/0 ? or 2001::/23
    Regards

    The IPv6 equivalent to IPv4's 0.0.0.0/0 is ::/0
    So, answering to your question: default route for IPv6 is ::/0
    Cheers, Gustavo

  • Basic wifi service question

    basic wifi service question
    A Windows-using friend of mine subscribes to a service from Verizon that is sort of like a cell phone for a computer - wifi service that you can access from theoretically anywhere, for something like $60 a month -
    as far as I can determine, one CAN get this for Mac but ONLY if you have a 15 or 17 inch laptop with PC slots - unless I am missing something. It requires a special kyocera card.
    Another company, T-Mobile, offers a similar service, but with no MAC access at all.
    So my question is: is there a similar service, wi-fi access theoretically anywhere (or even just anywhere in New York City) ? Hopefully with just the regular mac airport card and not any additional special hardware?
    Thanks!
    Will

    Hello WillFriedwald2
    The kind of service your describing is probably a 3G and GPRS service.
    Phone companies now offer mobile high speed connections using EDGE technology or GPRS2 and supply a 3G or GPRS PCMCIA card.
    However some companies are now offering a package whereby you get high speed 3g and gprs and also wifi.
    So to use this service on a laptop that has no PC card slot you need to get a 3G or GPRS2 phone that supports blue tooth then you can connect your laptop to the phone over bluetooth and therefore access high speed internet.
    But if you had a desktop mac such as a G5 you would be better just getting a regular cable or dsl connection in your home and invest in a wireless router.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Only is the last value is in output instead of all

    report zexam. tables : mara, mbew, mard,t023t. type-pools:slis. data : ist_list_topofpage type slis_t_listheader. data : s_list_topofpage type slis_listheader. data : i_fieldcat type  slis_t_fieldcat_alv. data : x_fieldcat type slis_fieldcat_alv. ***

  • Maps Problem with Glitchy Map Display

    I've been having a problem with Maps recently. Lately, I've been scrolling across maps and very (very) often I would have a really glitchy layout that looks like this: http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/442/mapsproblemrr6.png This occurs on both 3G a

  • Why is my iPod so slow since ios5

    Why is my iPod so slow after I updated to ios5.

  • Classic Scenario -Backend settings

    Hi, In the classic scenario the following is done in SRM 1. In the PPOMA_BBP - we are defining the Attribute : BSA - as EC 2. How this is linking with the Backend in  SAP R/3. We  have created the Logical system-in SM59 and RFC are assigned to SRM  a

  • Forwarding text mssg so it includes date /time stamp and number sent to

    My blackberry would forward or email a text message so that it included the address sent to, and was date and time stamped. I see how to forward in the iphone 4 ( Verizon) but it only send sends the message with no other data. How can I get it to inc