Bug report: Option boot fails to show FAT32 partition in SR MacBooks

Holding down the Option key only shows the Macintosh HD partition, even though Win XP Home SK2 is properly installed in Boot Camp into a FAT32 partition. The Windows HD partition shows up in the Startup Disk System Preferences, and can be booted into from there.
This appears to be a bug in Santa Rosa MacBook software for any FAT32 Boot Camp partition. This problem does not affect NTFS partitions. See the following thread with identical reports from a half-dozen independent SR MB owners:
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?p=4534929#post4534929
Can any other SR MacBook confirm or provide a counter-example (or workaround) for this problem?

I ran into the same problem when I installed Windows XP SP2 on a FAT 32 partition via Boot Camp. Unfortunately, selecting the Windows partition in Startup Disk preferences and then restarting didn't help matters any -- Windows would start to load and then my screen would just go black. I gave up after a few more tries and started all over with an NTFS partition. Things seem to be OK for now.

Similar Messages

Bug report: Safari 5 fails to handle 8192 bit RSA certificates

Running Safari 5.1.7 on OS X 10.6.8 -- I haven't confirmed for the version of Safari running on 10.7 -- and trying to access a site over https that uses an 8192 bits large RSA cert causes Safari to bug out. It can't display the certificate details correctly, giving just a garbled text output, and even a buggy interface dialog, and manually trying to accept the certificate to get the website to load causes Safari to run in an endless loop, displaying the certificate warning anew, over and over, making it impossible to load the page. The exact same certificate details put in a 4096 bit cert works just fine.
Could anyone in the core dev team take a look at this? The number of sites making use of 8192 bit large certs is growing, and Safari is the only browser out there that can't handle it.
add.: it seems the problem sits at a more fundamental level than in Safari, possibly in some underlying framework - apparently several other applications in OS X fails with handling an RSA cert of 8192 bits size, as mentioned in this thread: https://discussions.apple.com/message/11728527
Possibly related: https://discussions.apple.com/message/3650856

Could anyone in the core dev team take a look at this? The number of sites making use of 8192 bit large certs is growing, and Safari is the only browser out there that can't handle it.
It might be worth registering (for free) as an Apple Developer:
http://developer.apple.com/programs/register/
... and then you can use the Bug Reporter to submit trackable bug reports:
http://developer.apple.com/bugreporter/

Not booting after creating a fat32 partition from windows 8 from boot camp

I have windows 8.1 on a boot camp partition. I created a fat32 partition from windows looking forward to be able to share files to Yosemite OSX. But now, neither the OSX or the windows are booting. When pressing options key is only abailable one option, a disk tagged as "windows", and after trying to use it, it refers to a error message "UNMOUNTABLE_BOOT_VOLUME". I really really appreciate any help regarding this issue.

Your entire disk is a MBR disk. You will need to erase the disk, and start from the beginning and install Yosemite/Mavericks, and then use BC Assistant to create a Windows partition and install Windows. If you have a Time Capsule/Time Machhine backup, you can restore it after your erase using the command below.
You can erase the disk as follows
diskutil eraseDisk JHFS+ OSX disk0
Here is the Usage help syntax.
diskutil erasedisk
Usage: diskutil eraseDisk format name [APM[Format]|MBR[Format]|GPT[Format]]
MountPoint|DiskIdentifier|DeviceNode
Completely erase an existing whole disk. All volumes on this disk will be
destroyed. Ownership of the affected disk is required.
Format is the specific file system name you want to erase it as (HFS+, etc.).
Name is the (new) volume name (subject to file system naming restrictions),
or can be specified as %noformat% to skip initialization (newfs).
You cannot erase the boot disk.
Example: diskutil eraseDisk JHFS+ UntitledUFS disk3

First boot fails - Filesystem type unknown, partition type 0x7

Just done a straight forward install of Arch onto it's own disk drive, however there are two other drives present in the system.
Grub menu comes up ok but then Arch errors with:
root (hd2,0)
Filesystem type unknown, partition type 0x7
Error 17: Cannot mount selected partition
Any suggestions?
Thanks,

hokasch wrote:
What you still did not really tell us - how are you booting up? I.e. where is your first grub stage installed? How did you manage things with the debian install? Your problem is the root(x,x) line, not the kernel line. This line specifies the boot partition (grub's root/ where to find the kernel).
Coming from the windows world where for years we have just relied on changing the boot order of drives in the BIOS to choose which MBR to boot from I simply assumed it was just as easy in the Linux world, this is obviously not the case.
If you want to continue that way, just install grub to the MBR of each disk with a linux install and configure grub to use that drive as the first drive (e.g. set the root line to hd(0,0) if /boot is the first partition). IIRC, changing the boot order in the Bios will pull the selected drive to the beginning. That would fit your inital error (but you did not say how you booted into grub then...). You can double-check that behaviour by using the find commands in the grub shell (see my earlier post).
Going with grub2/grub's root by uuid only really makes sense if you put grub2 on the MBR of a drive which is always installed and selected as primary in Bios (obviously, all other grub2 files must be on that drive too).
Just done another completely clean install and noticed that even though I select 'Partition access method - uuid' it doesn't seem to actually work that way, at least checking menu.lst showed no signs of any uuids. What is the point of having an install option if it is then ignored.
This refers to your fstab, not the bootloader config.
Sorry hokasch, it got a bit difficult to answer your earlier post as by the time I read it Debian had been trashed and I think I had redone the Arch install a few times by then as well.
If I have understand you correctly what you are saying is that if I were to install arch on a drive which at install time is the only drive in the machine then root(x,x) would refer to hd0 in my case root (hd0,1) as I have an NTFS partition at the beginning of the drive. Alternatively I could just edit grub's menu.lst afterwards. That way as long as the drive is first in the BIOS boot order it will boot ok. My mistake seems to have been trying to install the first grub stage to somewhere other than the MBR, I may have missunderstood the capabilities of partition identification by uuid.
Ok lets go back to a single drive environment
hd0,0 = NTFS boot partition
hd0,1 = Arch /Boot - this contains grub & vmlinuz-linux
hd0,2 = Arch swap
hd0,3 = Arch /
If I want to boot Windows I set hd0,0 as active/bootable, if I want to boot arch I set hd0,1 as active/bootable. Actually not sure how to change the active partition to a linux one but come back to that later. For the moment hd0,1 is the bootable partition. This is the only drive in the system. I have a by-uuid entry in menu.lst which allows me to boot if the other entries fail. menu.lst looks like this:
# (0) Arch Linux
title Arch Linux
root (hd0,1)
kernel /vmlinuz-linux root=/dev/sda4 ro
initrd /initramfs-linux.img
Now I see part of the confusion, as you advised, the root (hdx,x) line actually refers to the 'grub root' / 'linux boot' not the 'linux root'. And the other confusion is that the kernel line root= does not refer to the location of /vmlinuz-linux but to the actual linux root. Now I think I understand that bit.
Now to add another disk to the system. Change drive order in BIOS so that arch disk is top of the boot order.
Fails to boot: Unable to find root device /dev/sda4!
Boot to knoppix to see the disk & partition layout:
hd0,0 = NTFS
hd0,1 = NTFS
hd0,2 = NTFS
hd0,3 = NTFS
hd0,4 = NTFS
hd0,4 = NTFS
hd0,4 = NTFS
hd1,0 = NTFS boot partition
hd1,1 = Arch /Boot - this contains grub & vmlinuz-linux
hd1,2 = Arch swap
hd1,3 = Arch /
So clearly /dev/sda4 is now an NTFS partition.
If appears that grub & linux do not see disk drives in the same order as the BIOS boot order causing /dev/sda4 to point towards the wrong partition.
Off at a bit of a tangent here but while I think of it is there a way of regenerating the menu.lst to search for instances of windows on NTFS partitions now that I have access to ntfs-3g.
Thanks,
Last edited by NickC_UK (2012-02-21 14:25:04)

Adding insult to injury. Adobe's Wishlist / Bug reporting doesn't work.

I sure hope Adobe is reading these forums, because I haven't been able to submit a single bug / feature request through the proper channel, and I've given up trying. It's one thing to make is all BETA testers without warning us. It's just fanning the flames of fury when Adobe Staff tell us to submit a bug. It's at least implied that Adobe will not be reading / hearing the messages on this forum. And I can't even submit a bug report because that form is broken!
I've spent around 24 hours so far BETA testing their software for them, so I hope they are reading these forums with gratitude for our free services.
Unfortunately, I must get back to work, now. No more time for BETA testing today.

I haven't been able to submit a single bug / feature request through the proper channel,
Since it is not mentioned in this thread:
Copy/pasting is often the culprit when bug report/feature requests fail. The was a problem some time back when we were copy/pasting suggested text from a forum post. While it appeared there was a character limit (and there probably is), I suspected that invisible "junk" (html code or Word stuff) was being pasted. I have better luck pasting from a pure text editor. I have best luck typing it, and copying from the bug/feature form to keep a copy.
Another thread today complained they could not post a link in a bug report. I have had no difficulty posting a link to a forum thread.
There are of course times where web submissions fail for no good (apparent) reason. I find that very frustrating; don't get me started on Adobe forums and Jive. But as far as I know, the bug/feature system is not part of that.

Boot Camp not showing anymore as a Startup Disk option?

For months, my internal 1TB had been partitioned 750GB/250GB OS X 10.6/Windows 7, with no problems - I want to use Windows, I either reboot and hold Alt, then choose Windows when the menu comes up, or I go System Preferences > Startup Disk and change it to "Boot Camp".
A few days ago I shrank the 10.6 partition by 200GB using Disk Utility, then formatted the space as Mac OS Extended and installed the preview of OS X 10.7 Lion (I was invited to try it via the AppleSeed programme).
Since then, the only options I have in System Prefs > Startup Disk or when holding Alt during boot are 10.6 and 10.7 - Boot Camp seems to have vanished as a choice. If I open Disk Utility, Boot Camp is still there, still 250GB. If I browse the Boot Camp partition in OS X I can see all my Windows files, etc, it just seems to be gone as a bootable option
Help!

I have the same problem... Can do WinClone, not supported on Lion, to get an image backup of W7 partition. At this point, since I can get to all the data on that partition, I would be more than happy to do an image backup of it, reinstall Windows 7 to get the boot partition to work, then reimage back to that original W7 partition so that I wouldn't have to reinstall and reconfigure all my applications.
My data is:
*** Report for internal hard disk ***
Current GPT partition table:
#      Start LBA      End LBA Type
1             40       409639 EFI System (FAT)
2         409640    253309143 Mac OS X HFS+
3      253309144    254578687 Mac OS X Boot
4      254578688    977104895 Basic Data
Current MBR partition table:
# A    Start LBA      End LBA Type
1              1       409639 ee EFI Protective
2         409640    253309143 af Mac OS X HFS+
3      253309144    254578687 ab Mac OS X Boot
4      254578688    977104895 07 NTFS/HPFS
MBR contents:
Boot Code: Unknown, but bootable
Partition at LBA 40:
Boot Code: None (Non-system disk message)
File System: FAT32
Listed in GPT as partition 1, type EFI System (FAT)
Partition at LBA 409640:
Boot Code: None
File System: HFS Extended (HFS+)
Listed in GPT as partition 2, type Mac OS X HFS+
Listed in MBR as partition 2, type af Mac OS X HFS+
Partition at LBA 253309144:
Boot Code: None
File System: HFS Extended (HFS+)
Listed in GPT as partition 3, type Mac OS X Boot
Listed in MBR as partition 3, type ab Mac OS X Boot
Partition at LBA 254578688:
Boot Code: Windows BOOTMGR (Vista)
File System: NTFS
Listed in GPT as partition 4, type Basic Data
Listed in MBR as partition 4, type 07 NTFS/HPFS

Bug Report iOS 7 iTunes. Since it is repeatable on 3 iPhones and 4 iPads here, I'm sure others are experiencing the same thing. Apple, might want to take a peek at this. When a tv show or movie is deleted from Videos, the Videos app shuts down.

Bug Report iOS 7 iTunes. Since it is repeatable on 3 iPhones and 4 iPads here, I'm sure others are experiencing the same thing. Apple, might want to take a peek at this. When a tv show or movie is deleted from Videos, the Videos app shuts down instead of returning to video playlist.
Restarting videos works and looks like video is getting deleted.
Just a bug report

You might want to report that to Apple instead of to the other users in this forum.
http://www.apple.com/feedback/iphone.html

How to submit a bug report for OSB? - restore fails if number of items per page is changed from the default of 30

In the OSB web gui, one of my users found that if the number of items per page is changed from the default of 30, the restore of the file will fail. He tested this using recent versions of Firefox and IE. We have verified this to also be the case using Chrome.
In a directory containing over 100,000 files, moving 30 at a time to find the one to be restored is a very frustrating user experience.
How do I file a bug report for this issue? Is there a workaround for this bug to enable my users to more easily find the file to restore without being restricted to the default of 30 items per page?

Yes there is a bug in the webtool in the current release. You can use the commandline obtool to do the restore, that is much faster and works fine.
Thanks
Rich

My BOOTCAMP partition can't be mounted and can boot but will fail boot, doesn't show in shartup disks what do I do?

Hi everybody.
After Updating the new 2.9EFI update for the 2012 MacBook Pro, I restarted the computer which was set to boot into windows. The windows booted and show the BSOD for a brief moment then closing. After I booted into Windows again to see "BOOT FAILED!" I switched into Mac OSX to see that the the BOOTCAMP partition was also gone in finder so I opened Disk Utility to see that the drive was unmountable so I did disk repair and said everything was fine. I booted windows again and now it says a different message, something on the lines of NO OS. I don't know whats happening and everything was working fine until this EFI 2.9 UPDATE and I want to keep my OS and don't want to get rid of windows. I also wan't to keep my documents on Windows. BOOTCAMP still says I have windows installed. Nothing else recognises windows is there exept DISK UTILITY. I did not tamper with windows. I also can't delete partition... MAC OS is working fine.

Hi everybody.
After Updating the new 2.9EFI update for the 2012 MacBook Pro, I restarted the computer which was set to boot into windows. The windows booted and show the BSOD for a brief moment then closing. After I booted into Windows again to see "BOOT FAILED!" I switched into Mac OSX to see that the the BOOTCAMP partition was also gone in finder so I opened Disk Utility to see that the drive was unmountable so I did disk repair and said everything was fine. I booted windows again and now it says a different message, something on the lines of NO OS. I don't know whats happening and everything was working fine until this EFI 2.9 UPDATE and I want to keep my OS and don't want to get rid of windows. I also wan't to keep my documents on Windows. BOOTCAMP still says I have windows installed. Nothing else recognises windows is there exept DISK UTILITY. I did not tamper with windows. I also can't delete partition... MAC OS is working fine.

Bug (reported to Apple) - Slide to unlock occasionally fails!

Hello folks,
Below is a copy of my bug report, I just missed an urgent call (with no call back number)... so I was prompted to finally report this problem!
Has anyone experienced this (I noticed some similar reports but none that exactly match my description).
NOTE: Please do not suggest that I turn off the "Slide to unlock" feature. I need to engage it, otherwise I will lose access to my corporate email.
Report----------------
Phone: iPhone 4
iOS: 4.3 (8F190)
I am experiencing a problem with the Slide to Unlock feature.
It is an inconsistent problem which is hard to repeat intentionally. However, it seems to occur randomly, about every 1 in 15 calls.
I believe the conditions related to the problem are as follows:
- Phone enters Auto-Lock mode (5 minutes)
Password Lock is engaged
- Screen off (phone not in use for more than 5 minutes)
Problem description:
When I receive phone call, I attempt to slide the "Slide to unlock" slider to the right. The slider does move to the right as intended, however, it has no affect on displaying the keypad.
The expected result should be the numeric keypad so that I can enter my keycode. As previously mention, these actions to answer a call do work more than 90% of time.
Additionally, pressing the Home button or the power button also has no affect while the phone is still ringing.
Only after the ringing has stopped do I regain control of the phone.
Note: This is not a new problem with iOS: 4.3 (8F190), rather, this did begin with the last iOS version.

Mine did it too, I would swipe the slide to unlock and the first attempt
failed usually 50% of time. I've since reactivated my old Nokia N95 until
we see what the next gen iPhone holds for us. My iPhone 4 was nothing
but trouble.
Despite this problem (which occurs rarely) and a few other idiosyncrasies, I can't agree with your statement. Since upgrading from the Android platform, the iPhone 4 is (by far) the very best phone I have ever owned!
It is hard to feel sorry for all those Android 'suckers' out there still complaining and hating their service providers for not releasing the latest aOS fixes. Complaining about bugs that will likely never get fixed...that is unless they upgrade to new Android hardware. Android... NEVER AGAIN!
BTW, I am no fanboy... I am just pleased with the iPhone user experience!

Bug Report (JDeveloper): No relative link option

To the JDeveloper team:
The html/jsp editor in JDeveloper has a "link" in the component palette but the dialog box does not provide an option for a relative link. Thus it is not possible to create the link: Ugh without manually removing the "http://" that is inserted by the palette. Simply add such an option to the dialog box dropdown to solve this.
(If there is a better place to direct such bug reports let me know.)

Hi Edward,
You might want to try reposting this on the JDeveloper forum
http://forums.oracle.com/forums/forum.jsp?id=315684
Cheers,
-lars

Boot camp wont show the option for installing via iso file

version 5.0.2(462)
the boot camp doesnt show the option to install the windows via iso file
i wanna install windows 7 via an iso file
plz help me as soon as possible

That option is only available for Macs without a built-in SuperDrive (the MacBook Air, Mid 2011 and newer Mac minis, the Late 2012 iMac, and the MacBook Pro with Retina display).
If you haven't got one of those computers and Boot Camp Assistant doesn't show the option to install Windows 7 from a ISO file, your Mac doesn't support the Windows installation from a USB because it's restricted by firmware to a Mac without a SuperDrive. In this case, you have to buy Windows 7 on a DVD from eBay or Amazon, and use it to install Windows through Boot Camp.
If you still wants to install Windows from a ISO file, the only option is to install it on a virtual machine, using an application like Parallels, VMware Fusion or VirtualBox

I did force shutdown on my MacBook Pro (2006 year, 15.4"), so, when I tried to boot, it shows apple logo (as usual) and shuts down. When I booting MacBook with Option key pressed it shows lock icon and field for password. Please help me.

I did force shutdown on my MacBook Pro (2006 year, 15.4"), so, when I tried to boot, it shows apple logo (as usual) and shuts down. When I booting MacBook with Option key pressed it shows lock icon and field for password. Please help me.

Wait for advice on repairing a damaged filesystem. Forceshutdown stops processs in mid-stream and leaves some parts not-valid.
Do not proceed until you get that avice.

Bug Report Fails

As suggested in a previous message, when I was unable to register, I submitted a bug report, only to be told that the page was no longer available. Please - how do we solve this?

I also logged a bug on the site. The report seems to work fine for me. Please check whether there is some javascript problem reported on the status bar of your browser.

KSLD bug report: 32 bit causes target panic

Since the bug report link:
http://soldc.sun.com/developer/support/driver/tools/KSLD/bug-report.html
goes to a non existant email address, I thought I would post here.
Setup:
ksld 1.01
target and host booted with kernel/unix (32 bit)
/proto directory struct as described in starting ksld doc
debugging ramd driver example
ramd directory:
drwxr-xr-x 4 root other 512 Feb 11 12:40 .
drwxr-xr-x 10 root other 512 Feb 11 12:47 ..
drwxrwxrwx 2 bin bin 512 Feb 11 10:26 777
-rw-r--r-- 1 root other 341 Feb 11 11:31 Makefile
-rw-r--r-- 1 root other 1610 Apr 24 2001 README
-rw-r--r-- 1 root other 3588 Apr 18 2001 install
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 52 Feb 11 10:47 misc -> /export/home/ksld-space/proto/root_sparc/kernel/misc
-rw-r--r-- 1 root other 2523 Apr 18 2001 ntestram.c
-rw-r--r-- 1 root other 2542 Apr 18 2001 printinfo.c
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 6 Feb 11 10:46 proto -> /proto
-rw-r--r-- 1 root other 25713 Feb 11 11:29 ramd.c
-rw-r--r-- 1 root other 291 Apr 18 2001 ramd.conf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root other 210 Apr 18 2001 ramio.h
drwxrwxrwx 4 bin bin 512 Feb 11 19:51 sparc
-rw-r--r-- 1 root other 1785 Apr 18 2001 testram.c
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 67 Feb 11 10:48 unix.281 -> /export/home/ksld-space/proto/root_sparc/platform/sun4u/kernel/unix
HOST output
home1# ksld -t hardwire unix.281 99
Reading unix.281
KSLD v1.0 on sun4u [SunOS 5.8]
Current thread is 0x4001fe60
Reading krtld
Reading genunix
Reading platmod
Reading SUNW,UltraSPARC-II
Reading specfs
Reading TS
Reading TS_DPTBL
Reading ufs
Reading fssnap_if
Reading rpcmod
Reading ip
Reading rootnex
Reading options
Reading sad
Reading pseudo
Reading sd
Reading scsi
Reading glm
Reading pcipsy
Reading dada
Reading todmostek
Reading procfs
Reading sockfs
Reading clone
Reading ip6
Reading tcp
Reading md5
Reading tcp6
Reading udp
Reading udp6
Reading icmp
Reading icmp6
Reading arp
Reading timod
Reading conskbd
Reading wc
Reading ebus
Reading su
Reading kb
Reading ms
Reading consms
Reading se
Reading elfexec
Reading fifofs
Reading ldterm
Reading ttcompat
Reading zs
Reading ptsl
Reading ptc
Reading rts
Reading tl
Reading keysock
Reading sysmsg
Reading cn
Reading pipe
Reading mm
Reading hme
Reading ufs_log
Reading doorfs
Reading devinfo
Reading iwscn
Reading log
Reading sy
Reading fctl
ksld_dbx: can't stat /platform/sun4u/kernel/drv/afb -- No such file or directory
Reading afb
ksld_dbx: can't open /platform/sun4u/kernel/drv/afb -- No such file or directory
Reading fd
Reading busra
Reading cs
Reading winlock
Reading seg_drv
Reading usba
Reading kstat
Reading vol
Reading cpc
Reading tnf
Reading pcihp
Reading hpcsvc
Reading pcicfg
Reading nfssrv
Reading nfs
Reading rpcsec
Reading tlimod
Reading seg_mapdev
Reading inst_sync
Reading mntfs
Reading tmpfs
Reading klmmod
Reading autofs
Reading connld
Reading bootdev
Reading shmsys
Reading ipc
Reading ramd
Reading kaio
detected a multithreaded program
t@0 stopped in (unknown) at 0xedd000d8
0xedd000d8: ta %icc,%g0 + 125
(ksld_dbx) module -v ramd.o
Module: ramd.o
Language: ansic
Debugging information: read [stabs version: 3.1]
Source file: /opt/SUNWddk/src/drivers/ramd/ramd.c
Object file: /opt/SUNWddk/src/drivers/ramd/sparc/obj32/ramd.o
Loadobject: /usr/kernel/drv/ramd
(ksld_dbx) stop in ram_strategy
(2) stop in ram_strategy
poll in failed
can't set breakpoint
TARGET output:
connected
New connection: uid 0, fd 7
Begin traceback... sp = edd48290
Called from edd009dc, fp=edd47b41, args=34 edd308ee eddc40a8 34 edd042f0 edd042ec
Called from edd03624, fp=edd47c11, args=fff74000 edda51f0 102d087a ffffffff91d0207e 0 4
Called from edd0c0d0, fp=edd47cd1, args=102d087a 91d0207e ff1bd714102d087a 100 edd48608 27
Called from edd0a394, fp=edd47d81, args=eddb7788 8 eddc16a1 f0000 1 ffff
Called from edd176d4, fp=edd47e31, args=ffff eddb7788 0 1 0 eddc1690
Called from edd0e470, fp=edd47f41, args=edd49058 0 0 3c 0 edda69d8
Called from edd0e214, fp=edd47ff1, args=eddb6d58 eddc1690 edd49158 ffffffffffffffff 10000 edd483e0
Called from edd0e154, fp=edd480a1, args=eddc1640 edda3550 0 0 0 0
Called from edd071b4, fp=edd48121, args=0 0 0 0 0 0
Called from 0, fp=0, args=0 0 0 0 0 0
End traceback...
abort jump: trap 34 sp edd48290 pc edd042ec npc edd042f0
etext edd308ee estack edd489a0 edata edda2388 nofault edda2658
ksld_kadb[0]: (`o403P0801So6mLD42d8N_lK^bH00004)(`o403P0801So6mLD42d8N_lK^bH0000
panic[cpu0]/thread=4001fe60: BAD TRAP: type=34 rp=4002fbc0 addr=40030507 mmu_fsr=0
sched: alignment error:
addr=0x40030507
pid=0, pc=0xedd2ba78, sp=0x4002fc50, tstate=0x1404, context=0x0
g1-g7: 1000c000, edda1f78, edda1f78, 0, edda2658, 14aef0, 4001fe60
panic: entering debugger (continue to save dump)
Trap 7d
What is wrong with the setup,when a breakpoint would cause a traceback and panic on the target?

One other possibility is having sufficient rights, especially if you are invoking it via some other app, rather than manually as a logged in user. If you are not logged in and instead invoke it via a web site action, I believe you will have problems reading the registry, accessing a desktop, writing to disk, etc.
Sorry I can't be more definitive, but perhaps it will help.
Please post your conclusion, if you find it.
--Ian

Bug report: Option boot fails to show FAT32 partition in SR MacBooks

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for