Business Rules: Account transformation and the source YEAR / PERIOD

Ladies and gents,
lets assume you have an amount of 100 on account A everymonth for 2 years.
in my business rules, account transforamtion, i put those sales to be transfer to an account B.
When i put DEC in period and -1 in year, then it will post the previous year cumulated amount of A to B. So be will have 1200
Now, lets assume I put 9 in period and -1 in year then it will bring me the total of previous year October if i am in january Y1, or previous year November if i am in february... But then in march, april, ... until the end of the year it will bring previous year December.
Now, when i put -3 in period and no change in year, for january, it brings january, for february it brings february, for march it brings march... But on April it brings january as expect...
I want it to come with 0 for the first 3 month... and only start in april!! Why does it do that considering that it for the previous example +3 after march always brings december... why then -3 in january doesnt bring nothin!!
Nic

You can greatly improve your chance of receiving a helpful answer to your question if you state the version (MS or NW) and the release (5.1, 7.0, 7.5) of BPC which you are using.
Also notice the sticky [note|Please do not post BPC, SSM or FI/CO questions here!; at the top of this forum whereby we announced new dedicated forums for BPC which are the proper place to post your questions regarding BPC in the future.
Thanks and best regards,
[Jeffrey Holdeman|http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/profile/Jeffrey+Holdeman]
SAP BusinessObjects
Enterprise Performance Management
Regional Implementation Group

Similar Messages

Business rules: Account transformation

Hi everyone.
I am trying to populate my cash flow statement using the Account Transformation. E.g For the changes in my inventories: I want the difference between the closing balance of DEC (of the previous year) and the closing balance of the current month.
I thought I could use "Source Period" and "Source Year" in the account transformation. Any idea how they can be used? I want to use a property: u201CPrevious yearu201D to make the time dynamic. Is that possible?
Thanks for your help
Esther

I would suggest using the dimension Account library functions and a dimension calculations or script logic calculations to create the value from the cube values, rather than during the data load process.Script Logic might look something like the following:
INCLUDE SYSTEM_CONSTANTS.LGL
*SYSLIB CONSOLIDATION_LIBRARY.LGL
// MOVE INCOME STATEMENT ITEMS TO CASH FLOW STATEMENT
RUNSUMMARIZE(ThisApp,CF_SUMM,%CATEGORY_SET%,%LC_RPT_CURR%)
//CALCULATE BALANCE SHEET MOVEMENTS AND POST TO CASH FLOW STATEMENT
*SELECT(%FROM_ACCOUNT%, "[ID]", "ACCOUNT", "[CF_TO_ACCT] <> ''")
*XDIM_MEMBERSET ACCOUNT = %FROM_ACCOUNT%
*XDIM_ADDMEMBERSET TIME = PRIOR
*XDIM_MEMBERSET RPTCURRENCY=%LC_RPT_CURR%
*WHEN TIME
      *IS %TIME_SET%
            *REC(ACCOUNT=ACCOUNT.CF_TO_ACCT)
      *IS PRIOR
            *REC(FACTOR=-1,ACCOUNT=ACCOUNT.CF_TO_ACCT,TIME=NEXT)
*ENDWHEN
*COMMIT
But this will require a few properties on the accounts members to support the calculations. The idea for cash flow is to have the basic values in the accounts, and then provide the calculations to place values into another set of accounts that build the CAshFLow statement. The most difficult part will be dealing with the exceptions, changes to the Cash Flow statement process a customer will need to work with each reporting period. But Script logic generally works the best.

Business Rule Currency Conversion and Carry Forward

Hello Guys,
I have a question related to the Business Rules Currency Conversion and Carry Forward
I configured the business rule "Currency Conversion" and I selected "Apply to Periodic". What this rules does with the flag selected is to get the value of the previous month converted and add the factor (Local Currency previos month - Local Currency Actual month) * Exchange Rate of Current Month
For Example: USD previos month +
This rule applies perfectly from FEB to DEC but if I run it for January, it does not consider the value of USD previos month and LC previous month for calculations so the result I get is:
(and of course it´s because it only applies to periodic)
I need to include into my results this amounts and factor so the question is: Is not a flag I can activate to force the system to act as it does for FEB to DEC periodic ??
I also set up the Business Rule "Carry Forward" so with this rule Im able to bring values converted in USD from DEC to JAN for example from a Data Source Input, but the problem is that it erase any other value I have in other Data Source members and I need to keep that info.
Hope you can come with a suggestion.
Im working with SAP BPC NW 7.5 SP08

Hello guys,
Yes, my fiscal year is from JAN to DEC and Im using a YTD app,
As you mentioned for P&L accounts the rule works fine; but we want to carry forward LEQ accounts. Is there a way to use or configure the currency conversion rule with the flag "Apply to Periodic" to carry forward LEQ accounts for the next following year?
Here is how we configured our Carry Forward Business Rule
Source and Destionation account = 4111
Source and destionation Flow= FCLO
Reverse Sign= False
Data Source Type= ALL
Same Period= False
Apply to Periodic=False
Opening Data Source=DatosBase
Source Data Source = AJ_AC
Regards

Why not allow Business Rule Design Transformer to overwrite existing BRDDs

Hi,
It can be quite annoying during development to continually having to remove the BRDD Trigger and PL/SQL Definition when running the BR Design Transformer reveals missing information in the BR Analysis definition. It seems that it would be practical to have at least the option to have the Business Rule Design Transformer overwrite an existing Business Rule Design Definition.
You could think of an additional parameter in this utilily labeled "Overwrite existing BRDD?" with allowable values Y(es) and N(o) with No as default (so that the default functionality is the same as before).
Below you find the code that can be added to the HSU_BRTR package to realize such a functional improvement. Maybe you can consider it for a next release...?!
best regards,
Lucas Jellema
AMIS Services BV
code to add to HSU_BRTR to provide a parameter that allows the user to specify whether or not the HSU_BRTR is allowed to overwrite an existing BRDD:
in the revision history:
09-jan-2003 Lucas Jellema
6.5.2.3AMIS1.1 Added new parameter and supporting code that allows user to indicate
whether existing Business Rule Design Definitions may be/should be overwritten
at the end of procedure install
hsu_install.add_parameter
( PACKAGE_NAME -- package name
, 40 -- sequence
, 'Overwrite existing BRDDs?' -- prompt
, 'N' -- default value actual
, 'No' -- default value displayed
, 'Y' -- mandatory
, 'N' -- allow multi-select
, 'N' -- include shared elements
, '' -- element type short name
, '' -- sql expression actual
, '' -- sql expression displayed
, null -- where clause
, null -- synchronize with
, null -- foreign key column
, -- help text
'Choose whether you want this utility to overwrite existing Business Rule Design Definitions.'
hsu_install.add_allowable_value
( PACKAGE_NAME -- package name
, 40 -- parameter
, 1 -- sequence
, 'Y' -- actual value
, 'Yes' -- displayed value
hsu_install.add_allowable_value
( PACKAGE_NAME -- package name
, 40 -- parameter
, 2 -- sequence
, 'N' -- actual value
, 'No' -- displayed value
--------6.5.2.3AMIS1.1
Just before procedure transform_stage2
procedure delete_brdds
( p_tbl_id in ci_table_definitions.id%type
, p_br_name in varchar2
-- Purpose Delete existing Business Rule Design Definition
-- Usage from run procedure
-- Remarks Find PL/SQl Module Definition based on Business Rule Label
is
cursor c_brdd
( b_tbl_id in ci_table_definitions.id%type
, b_br_name in varchar2
is
select trg.id trg_id
, trg.name name
, plm.id plm_id
from ci_database_triggers trg
, ci_plsql_modules plm
where trg.table_definition_reference = b_tbl_id
and trg.plsql_module_reference = plm.id
and plm.name = b_br_name
begin
-- loop over journalling busrules of this application
<<brdd>>
for r_brdd in c_brdd(p_tbl_id, p_br_name) loop
-- delete busrule (delete of trigger is since 6i not enough anymore, so
-- explicitly delete PL/SQL module also)
bllog.write
( 'Deleting trigger '||r_brdd.name||' and PL/SQL module '
||hsu_name.get_name_and_path(r_brdd.plm_id)
||', a new business rule design definition overwrites this old one.'
, bllog.information
bltrg.del(r_brdd.trg_id);
blplm.del(r_brdd.plm_id);
end loop brdd;
end delete_brdds;
inside procedure transform_stage2
(just before the comment: -- check if BRDD with this plm_name already exists)
if p_overwrite_br = 'Y'
     then
delete_brdds
( p_tbl_id => g_trg_tbl(i).tbl_id
, p_br_name => l_plm_name
     end if; -- find_trg and overwrite =Y
A new parameter in procedure transform_br_fun
procedure transform_br_fun
, p_overwrite_br in varchar2 default 'N' -- 6.5.2.3AMIS1.1
use the parameter p_overwrite_br in the call to transform_stage2
transform_stage2
( p_fun_id => p_fun_id
, p_fun_label => r_fun.fun_function_label
, p_fun_short_definition => r_fun.fun_short_definition
, p_msg_prefix => p_msg_prefix
, p_msg_language => p_msg_language
, p_rule_type => l_rule_type
               , p_overwrite_br => p_overwrite_br -- 6.5.2.3AMIS1.1
new parameter p_overwrite_br in the procedure run
NOTE: in both PACKAGE SPECIFICATION and BODY
, p_overwrite_br in varchar2 default'N' -- 6.5.2.3AMIS1.1
use the parameter p_overwrite_br in all calls to transform_br_fun inside procedure run
transform_br_fun
( p_fun_id => r_fun_tree.id
, p_msg_prefix => p_msg_prefix
, p_msg_language => p_msg_language
, p_create_att_usages => p_create_att_usages
, p_overwrite_br => p_overwrite_br -- 6.5.2.3AMIS1.1

Among the alternatives not mentioned... Using a TiVo DVR, rather than the X1; a Roamio Plus or Pro would solve both the concern over the quality of the DVR, as well as providing the MoCA bridge capability the poster so desperately wanted the X1 DVR to provide. (Although the TiVo's support only MoCA 1.1.) Just get a third-party MoCA adapter for the distant location. Why the hang-up on having a device provided by Comcast? This seems especially ironic given the opinions expressed regarding payments over time to Comcast. If a MoCA 2.0 bridge was the requirement, they don't exist outside providers. So couldn't the poster have simply requested a replacement XB3 from the local office and configured it down to only providing MoCA bridging -- and perhaps as a wireless access point? Comcast would bill him the monthly rate for the extra device, but such is the state of MoCA 2.0. Much of the OP sounds like frustration over devices providing capabilities the poster *thinks* they should have.

Business Rule Design Transformer fails with ORA-00001

I'm stuck with the Business Rule Design Transformer Utility of Headstart. After running this utility over one BR it is impossible to run it over other BR's because of violation of the unique constraint HST65.QMS_MSP_PK (table QMS_MESSAGE_PROPERTIES). The problem is that the utility tries to insert a record (message, specified in the Notes property of Designer) into QMS_MESSAGE_PROPERTIES with the code "ABI-10000", that was already created by running the utility for the first time.
Exact error message: "Activity aborted with ORACLE internal errors.
-1 ORA-00001: unique constraint (HST65.QMS_MSP_PK) violated"
I'm using Designer 6i (6.5.52.1.0) and Headstart 6.5.1.3
If someone has any clue about this I would be very grateful
Cheers,
Dimce

Jan,
The name of the business rule is already in the CONSTRAINT_NAME of the QMS_MESSAGE_PROPERTIES table.
I already tested by deleting the records in the two tables, QMS_MESSAGE_PROPERTIES and QMS_MESSAGE_TEXT, and ran the utility, but it didn't help either. I can run the utility for one rule, but when I want to run it again at some later point, it fails with this error.
But, I managed to create rule definitions using the HSU Create Business Rule Design Definition, rule by rule. I only had to add references in the business rule to the used module.
Dimce

Business rule trigger not calling the procedure in my code

Good morning every one,
I have a small problem with two of my business rule triggers.
I have these tables:
pms_activity
csh_cash
csh_integrate_leh
csh_integrate_led
and my process goes like this:
upon approval of a row in my pms_activity table I have a trigger that insert a row in my csh_cash - and in the csh_cash table I have a trigger that will insert in the csh_ingerate_leh and csh_integrate_led.
my problem is pms_activity does generate a row in csh_cash but the trigger in the cash does not fire to generate a row in the csh_integrate_leh and led tables.
I have generated in the following order after I created my business rule:
I have generated the table from the designer (server module tab)
I have generated the CAPI from the head start utility
I have generated the API from the designer
I have generated the CAPI from the designer
I have run the recompil.sql
I have checked that my business rule trigger is enabled and should run on insert and no where restriction
=== this is my business rule logic ======
l_rule_ok boolean := true;
begin
trace('br_csh001_cev (f)');
csh_gl_pkg.csh_gen_integ_jvs(p_id
,p_ref_num
,p_own_id
,p_trt_id
,p_value_date
,p_description
,p_amount
,p_cur_id
,p_gla_dr
,p_gla_cr
,p_gla_pl
,p_gla_rev
,p_gla_eqt);
return l_rule_ok;
exception
when others
then
qms$errors.unhandled_exception(PACKAGE_NAME||'.br_csh001_cev (f)');
end br_csh001_cev;
==== end =======================
Any help will be appreciated as I have struggled with this for two days.
Thanks

Haroon,
SAP does not allow Stored Procedures to be used as part of the SAP Business Db or to be used to access SAP Business One tables directly for Insert, Update or Delete. Any interaction with the SAP Business One Db is required to go through the SAP Business One API's, namely the DI and UI API's.
Eddy

Business partner account assignment and G/L account assignment different

Hello Experts,
I am facing the issue of "Business partner account assignment and G/L account assignment different" Message no. FKKFMCHK039, while I am processing the Check lot (FP25).
Notable points are:
01) We are using the functionality of Interest, if customer pays the outstanding after due date, payment will post the interest on the outstanding;
02) I cross checked the account balance of business partners for which I am facing this problem, if payment amount is more then the outstanding balance then only we are facing this error, however under clarification processing if we post the payment with option of Post on account , payments are getting posted.
Looking for your valuable inputs.
Regards,
Anurag

Hello Experts,
Thanks for your support. However, I have regular interaction with SAP regarding above issue, and we have found there is program error, for which they have released the note number 2014364.
Regards,
Anurag sharma

ORA-06502 in Business Rule Design Transformer

For a specific business rule we got the following error: ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: character string buffer too small. It appears that it is caused by a long entity relation name. See the detailed logging below. Bij reducing the length of the entity relation name involved the utility worked file.
Relationship: afstand rechtsmiddel gedaan bij namens verdachte door is included as Usage for entity: GGRL/ RELATIE
Relend usage is found with name: technisch ttz gevoegd bij and id: 1497077058224033627321119385618562861
Relationship: TECHNISCH TTZ GEVOEGD BIJ->STRAFZAAK is not found to be part of AFSTAND RECHTSMIDDEL GEDAAN BIJ NAMENS VERDACHTE DOOR->RELATIE
Triggering event UPDATE UITSPRAAK.AFSTAND RECHTSMIDDEL G0 found.
bltext.get_lines_from_repository, p_text_type=CDIDSC
bltext.get_line_containing
Activity aborted with ORACLE internal errors.
-6502 ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: character string buffer too small

Jan,
The name of the business rule is already in the CONSTRAINT_NAME of the QMS_MESSAGE_PROPERTIES table.
I already tested by deleting the records in the two tables, QMS_MESSAGE_PROPERTIES and QMS_MESSAGE_TEXT, and ran the utility, but it didn't help either. I can run the utility for one rule, but when I want to run it again at some later point, it fails with this error.
But, I managed to create rule definitions using the HSU Create Business Rule Design Definition, rule by rule. I only had to add references in the business rule to the used module.
Dimce

What are differences between the target tablespace and the source tablespac

The IMPDP command create so manay errors. But the EXAMPLE tablespace is transported to the target database successfully. It seems that the transported tablespace is no difference with the source tablespace.
Why create so many errors?
How to avoid these errors?
What are differences between the target tablespace and the source tablespace?
Is this datapump action really successfull?
Thw following is the log output:
[oracle@hostp ~]$ impdp system/oracle dumpfile=user_dir:demo02.dmp tablespaces=example remap_tablespace=example:example
Import: Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production on Sunday, 28 September, 2008 18:08:31
Copyright (c) 2003, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Connected to: Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
Master table "SYSTEM"."SYS_IMPORT_TABLESPACE_01" successfully loaded/unloaded
Starting "SYSTEM"."SYS_IMPORT_TABLESPACE_01": system/******** dumpfile=user_dir:demo02.dmp tablespaces=example remap_tablespace=example:example
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/TABLE
ORA-39117: Type needed to create table is not included in this operation. Failing sql is:
CREATE TABLE "OE"."CUSTOMERS" ("CUSTOMER_ID" NUMBER(6,0), "CUST_FIRST_NAME" VARCHAR2(20) CONSTRAINT "CUST_FNAME_NN" NOT NULL ENABLE, "CUST_LAST_NAME" VARCHAR2(20) CONSTRAINT "CUST_LNAME_NN" NOT NULL ENABLE, "CUST_ADDRESS" "OE"."CUST_ADDRESS_TYP" , "PHONE_NUMBERS" "OE"."PHONE_LIST_TYP" , "NLS_LANGUAGE" VARCHAR2(3), "NLS_TERRITORY" VARCHAR2(30), "CREDIT_LIMIT" NUMBER(9,2), "CUST_EMAIL" VARCHAR2(30), "ACCOUNT_MGR_ID" NU
ORA-39117: Type needed to create table is not included in this operation. Failing sql is:
ORA-39117: Type needed to create table is not included in this operation. Failing sql is:
CREATE TABLE "IX"."ORDERS_QUEUETABLE" ("Q_NAME" VARCHAR2(30), "MSGID" RAW(16), "CORRID" VARCHAR2(128), "PRIORITY" NUMBER, "STATE" NUMBER, "DELAY" TIMESTAMP (6), "EXPIRATION" NUMBER, "TIME_MANAGER_INFO" TIMESTAMP (6), "LOCAL_ORDER_NO" NUMBER, "CHAIN_NO" NUMBER, "CSCN" NUMBER, "DSCN" NUMBER, "ENQ_TIME" TIMESTAMP (6), "ENQ_UID" VARCHAR2(30), "ENQ_TID" VARCHAR2(30), "DEQ_TIME" TIMESTAMP (6), "DEQ_UID" VARCHAR2(30), "DEQ_
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/TABLE_DATA
. . imported "SH"."CUSTOMERS" 9.850 MB 55500 rows
. . imported "SH"."SUPPLEMENTARY_DEMOGRAPHICS" 695.9 KB 4500 rows
. . imported "OE"."PRODUCT_DESCRIPTIONS" 2.379 MB 8640 rows
. . imported "SH"."SALES":"SALES_Q4_2001" 2.257 MB 69749 rows
. . imported "SH"."SALES":"SALES_Q1_1999" 2.070 MB 64186 rows
. . imported "SH"."SALES":"SALES_Q3_2001" 2.129 MB 65769 rows
. . imported "SH"."SALES":"SALES_Q1_2000" 2.011 MB 62197 rows
. . imported "SH"."SALES":"SALES_Q1_2001" 1.964 MB 60608 rows
. . imported "SH"."SALES":"SALES_Q2_2001" 2.050 MB 63292 rows
. . imported "SH"."SALES":"SALES_Q3_1999" 2.166 MB 67138 rows
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/GRANT/OWNER_GRANT/OBJECT_GRANT
ORA-39083: Object type OBJECT_GRANT failed to create with error:
ORA-01917: user or role 'USER1' does not exist
Failing sql is:
GRANT SELECT ON "HR"."REGIONS" TO "USER1"
ORA-39083: Object type OBJECT_GRANT failed to create with error:
ORA-01917: user or role 'EXAM_03' does not exist
Failing sql is:
GRANT SELECT ON "HR"."REGIONS" TO "EXAM_03"
ORA-39083: Object type OBJECT_GRANT failed to create with error:
ORA-01917: user or role 'USER1' does not exist
Failing sql is:
GRANT SELECT ON "HR"."COUNTRIES" TO "USER1"
ORA-39083: Object type OBJECT_GRANT failed to create with error:
ORA-01917: user or role 'EXAM_03' does not exist
Failing sql is:
GRANT SELECT ON "HR"."COUNTRIES" TO "EXAM_03"
ORA-39083: Object type OBJECT_GRANT failed to create with error:
ORA-01917: user or role 'USER1' does not exist
Failing sql is:
GRANT SELECT ON "HR"."LOCATIONS" TO "USER1"
ORA-39083: Object type OBJECT_GRANT failed to create with error:
ORA-01917: user or role 'EXAM_03' does not exist
Failing sql is:
GRANT SELECT ON "HR"."LOCATIONS" TO "EXAM_03"
ORA-39083: Object type OBJECT_GRANT failed to create with error:
ORA-01917: user or role 'USER1' does not exist
Failing sql is:
GRANT SELECT ON "HR"."DEPARTMENTS" TO "USER1"
ORA-39083: Object type OBJECT_GRANT failed to create with error:
ORA-01917: user or role 'EXAM_03' does not exist
Failing sql is:
GRANT SELECT ON "HR"."DEPARTMENTS" TO "EXAM_03"
ORA-39083: Object type OBJECT_GRANT failed to create with error:
ORA-01917: user or role 'USER1' does not exist
Failing sql is:
GRANT SELECT ON "HR"."JOBS" TO "USER1"
ORA-39083: Object type OBJECT_GRANT failed to create with error:
ORA-01917: user or role 'EXAM_03' does not exist
Failing sql is:
GRANT SELECT ON "HR"."JOBS" TO "EXAM_03"
ORA-39083: Object type OBJECT_GRANT failed to create with error:
ORA-01917: user or role 'USER1' does not exist
Failing sql is:
GRANT SELECT ON "HR"."EMPLOYEES" TO "USER1"
ORA-39083: Object type OBJECT_GRANT failed to create with error:
ORA-01917: user or role 'EXAM_03' does not exist
Failing sql is:
GRANT SELECT ON "HR"."EMPLOYEES" TO "EXAM_03"
ORA-39083: Object type OBJECT_GRANT failed to create with error:
ORA-01917: user or role 'USER1' does not exist
Failing sql is:
GRANT SELECT ON "HR"."JOB_HISTORY" TO "USER1"
ORA-39083: Object type OBJECT_GRANT failed to create with error:
ORA-01917: user or role 'EXAM_03' does not exist
Failing sql is:
GRANT SELECT ON "HR"."JOB_HISTORY" TO "EXAM_03"
ORA-39112: Dependent object type OBJECT_GRANT:"OE" skipped, base object type TABLE:"OE"."CUSTOMERS" creation failed
ORA-39112: Dependent object type OBJECT_GRANT:"OE" skipped, base object type TABLE:"OE"."CUSTOMERS" creation failed
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/INDEX/INDEX
ORA-39112: Dependent object type INDEX:"OE"."CUSTOMERS_PK" skipped, base object type TABLE:"OE"."CUSTOMERS" creation failed
ORA-39112: Dependent object type INDEX:"OE"."CUST_ACCOUNT_MANAGER_IX" skipped, base object type TABLE:"OE"."CUSTOMERS" creation failed
ORA-39112: Dependent object type INDEX:"OE"."CUST_LNAME_IX" skipped, base object type TABLE:"OE"."CUSTOMERS" creation failed
ORA-39112: Dependent object type INDEX:"OE"."CUST_EMAIL_IX" skipped, base object type TABLE:"OE"."CUSTOMERS" creation failed
ORA-39112: Dependent object type INDEX:"PM"."PRINTMEDIA_PK" skipped, base object type TABLE:"PM"."PRINT_MEDIA" creation failed
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/CONSTRAINT/CONSTRAINT
ORA-39112: Dependent object type CONSTRAINT:"OE"."CUSTOMER_CREDIT_LIMIT_MAX" skipped, base object type TABLE:"OE"."CUSTOMERS" creation failed
ORA-39112: Dependent object type CONSTRAINT:"OE"."CUSTOMER_ID_MIN" skipped, base object type TABLE:"OE"."CUSTOMERS" creation failed
ORA-39112: Dependent object type CONSTRAINT:"OE"."CUSTOMERS_PK" skipped, base object type TABLE:"OE"."CUSTOMERS" creation failed
ORA-39112: Dependent object type CONSTRAINT:"PM"."PRINTMEDIA__PK" skipped, base object type TABLE:"PM"."PRINT_MEDIA" creation failed
ORA-39112: Dependent object type CONSTRAINT:"IX"."SYS_C005192" skipped, base object type TABLE:"IX"."ORDERS_QUEUETABLE" creation failed
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/INDEX/STATISTICS/INDEX_STATISTICS
ORA-39112: Dependent object type INDEX_STATISTICS skipped, base object type INDEX:"OE"."CUSTOMERS_PK" creation failed
ORA-39112: Dependent object type INDEX_STATISTICS skipped, base object type INDEX:"OE"."CUST_ACCOUNT_MANAGER_IX" creation failed
ORA-39112: Dependent object type INDEX_STATISTICS skipped, base object type INDEX:"OE"."CUST_LNAME_IX" creation failed
ORA-39112: Dependent object type INDEX_STATISTICS skipped, base object type INDEX:"OE"."CUST_EMAIL_IX" creation failed
ORA-39112: Dependent object type INDEX_STATISTICS skipped, base object type INDEX:"PM"."PRINTMEDIA_PK" creation failed
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/COMMENT
ORA-39112: Dependent object type COMMENT skipped, base object type TABLE:"OE"."CUSTOMERS" creation failed
ORA-39112: Dependent object type COMMENT skipped, base object type TABLE:"OE"."CUSTOMERS" creation failed
ORA-39112: Dependent object type COMMENT skipped, base object type TABLE:"OE"."CUSTOMERS" creation failed
ORA-39112: Dependent object type COMMENT skipped, base object type TABLE:"OE"."CUSTOMERS" creation failed
ORA-39112: Dependent object type COMMENT skipped, base object type TABLE:"OE"."CUSTOMERS" creation failed
ORA-39112: Dependent object type COMMENT skipped, base object type TABLE:"OE"."CUSTOMERS" creation failed
ORA-39112: Dependent object type COMMENT skipped, base object type TABLE:"OE"."CUSTOMERS" creation failed
ORA-39112: Dependent object type COMMENT skipped, base object type TABLE:"OE"."CUSTOMERS" creation failed
ORA-39112: Dependent object type COMMENT skipped, base object type TABLE:"OE"."CUSTOMERS" creation failed
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/CONSTRAINT/REF_CONSTRAINT
ORA-39112: Dependent object type REF_CONSTRAINT:"OE"."CUSTOMERS_ACCOUNT_MANAGER_FK" skipped, base object type TABLE:"OE"."CUSTOMERS" creation failed
ORA-39083: Object type REF_CONSTRAINT failed to create with error:
ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
Failing sql is:
ALTER TABLE "OE"."ORDERS" ADD CONSTRAINT "ORDERS_CUSTOMER_ID_FK" FOREIGN KEY ("CUSTOMER_ID") REFERENCES "OE"."CUSTOMERS" ("CUSTOMER_ID") ON DELETE SET NULL ENABLE
ORA-39112: Dependent object type REF_CONSTRAINT:"PM"."PRINTMEDIA_FK" skipped, base object type TABLE:"PM"."PRINT_MEDIA" creation failed
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/TRIGGER
ORA-39082: Object type TRIGGER:"HR"."SECURE_EMPLOYEES" created with compilation warnings
ORA-39082: Object type TRIGGER:"HR"."SECURE_EMPLOYEES" created with compilation warnings
ORA-39082: Object type TRIGGER:"HR"."UPDATE_JOB_HISTORY" created with compilation warnings
ORA-39082: Object type TRIGGER:"HR"."UPDATE_JOB_HISTORY" created with compilation warnings
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/INDEX/FUNCTIONAL_AND_BITMAP/INDEX
ORA-39112: Dependent object type INDEX:"OE"."CUST_UPPER_NAME_IX" skipped, base object type TABLE:"OE"."CUSTOMERS" creation failed
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/INDEX/STATISTICS/FUNCTIONAL_AND_BITMAP/INDEX_STATISTICS
ORA-39112: Dependent object type INDEX_STATISTICS skipped, base object type INDEX:"OE"."CUST_UPPER_NAME_IX" creation failed
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/STATISTICS/TABLE_STATISTICS
ORA-39112: Dependent object type TABLE_STATISTICS skipped, base object type TABLE:"OE"."CUSTOMERS" creation failed
ORA-39112: Dependent object type TABLE_STATISTICS skipped, base object type TABLE:"PM"."PRINT_MEDIA" creation failed
ORA-39112: Dependent object type TABLE_STATISTICS skipped, base object type TABLE:"PM"."PRINT_MEDIA" creation failed
ORA-39112: Dependent object type TABLE_STATISTICS skipped, base object type TABLE:"IX"."ORDERS_QUEUETABLE" creation failed
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/INDEX/DOMAIN_INDEX/INDEX
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/POST_INSTANCE/PROCACT_INSTANCE
ORA-39112: Dependent object type PROCACT_INSTANCE skipped, base object type TABLE:"IX"."ORDERS_QUEUETABLE" creation failed
ORA-39083: Object type PROCACT_INSTANCE failed to create with error:
ORA-01403: no data found
ORA-01403: no data found
Failing sql is:
BEGIN
SYS.DBMS_AQ_IMP_INTERNAL.IMPORT_SIGNATURE_TABLE('AQ$_ORDERS_QUEUETABLE_G');COMMIT; END;
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/POST_INSTANCE/PROCDEPOBJ
ORA-39112: Dependent object type PROCDEPOBJ:"IX"."AQ$_ORDERS_QUEUETABLE_V" skipped, base object type TABLE:"IX"."ORDERS_QUEUETABLE" creation failed
ORA-39112: Dependent object type PROCDEPOBJ:"IX"."ORDERS_QUEUE_N" skipped, base object type TABLE:"IX"."ORDERS_QUEUETABLE" creation failed
ORA-39112: Dependent object type PROCDEPOBJ:"IX"."ORDERS_QUEUE_R" skipped, base object type TABLE:"IX"."ORDERS_QUEUETABLE" creation failed
ORA-39112: Dependent object type PROCDEPOBJ:"IX"."AQ$_ORDERS_QUEUETABLE_E" skipped, base object type TABLE:"IX"."ORDERS_QUEUETABLE" creation failed
ORA-39112: Dependent object type PROCDEPOBJ:"IX"."ORDERS_QUEUE" skipped, base object type TABLE:"IX"."ORDERS_QUEUETABLE" creation failed
Job "SYSTEM"."SYS_IMPORT_TABLESPACE_01" completed with 63 error(s) at 18:09:14

Short of trying to then reverse-engineer the objects that are in the dump file (I believe Data Pump export files contain some XML representations of DDL in addition to various binary bits, making it potentially possible to try to scan the dump file for the object definitions), I would tend to assume that the export didn't include those type definitions.
Since it looks like you're trying to set up the sample schemas, is there a reason that you wouldn't just run the sample schema setup scripts on the destination database? Why are you using Data Pump in the first place?
Justin

How can I get a file to copy all of the files in a directory except itself and the source of the copy function will be the directory the final program is in?

How can I get a file to copy all of the files in a directory except itself and the source of the copy function will be the directory the final program is in? This application must be in Lab View 8.

you mean something like this (see below)?
Now you may have to implement code to check if the destination folder exists and to create it, etc. But if you use the Front Panel Control to select the destination folder, it should be okay.
Not the best implementation, mind you but you'll get the idea..
Message Edited by JoeLabView on 04-18-2007 03:43 PM
Attachments:
copy folder contents.PNG ‏10 KB

How to populate the data or details of only the present year and the previous year with respect to the given RATNG?

Hi All,
I have created a form with 5 blocks (namely ENQACMHDR, ENQACMDTL, ENQACEHDR, ENQACEDTL, ENQACSPEC), where i have 8 push buttons (namely ENTER_QUERY, EXEC_QUERY, CLEAR, FIRST, NEXT, PREVIOUS, LAST & EXIT).
This form is created just for viewing purpose only. So after I execute, all the blocks have been blocked against insert & update.
I query on 2 fields that is 'ENQNO' and 'RATNG' (Both the fields belong to the block ENQACMDTL).
When I click on 'EXEC_QUERY' directly, all the data of all the years populates.
But the user wanted the data to be populated from only the present year and the previous year.
So , on 'WHERE Clause' of the property_palette of 'ENQACMDTL' block , I put in the following condition:
SUBSTR(ENQACMDTL.ENQNO, 1,4)=TO_CHAR( ADD_MONTHS(SYSDATE,-12) , 'YYYY') OR SUBSTR(ENQACMDTL.ENQNO, 1,4)=TO_CHAR(SYSDATE, 'YYYY')
PROPERTY PALETTE (ENQACMDTL block)
WHERE Clause
SUBSTR(ENQACMDTL.ENQNO, 1,4)=TO_CHAR( ADD_MONTHS(SYSDATE,-12) , 'YYYY') OR SUBSTR(ENQACMDTL.ENQNO, 1,4)=TO_CHAR(SYSDATE, 'YYYY')
Now the data of only the present year and the previous year is being populated. Its ok with the field of 'ENQNO'.
The problem is when i query on field 'RATNG' . 'RATNG' is a Text_item with Number of Items displayed=5. (5 rows)
The following are 2 columns of a Table (Name=ENQACMDTL) in Database.
ENQNO
RATNG
2013900054
500KC2
2013900047
800KC4
2013520018
750KC6
2012900037
1000KC2
2012520109
500KC2
2012140019
750KC6
2011540036
500KC2
2011100030
1000KC2
2006100007
90KD8
2006750014
750KC6
2006900072
500KC2
The first 4 numbers of 'ENQNO' denotes the year. There are more than a lakhs of records.
So when i query on the field 'RATNG',
Example:For RATNG=500KC2;
I click on ENTER_QUERY, On the field of 'RATNG' , i put in the value 500KC2 and click on EXEC_QUERY; Details with respect to 500KC2 is displayed as well as all the other unwanted RATNG like 750KC6, 1000KC2 (which belongs to the ENQNO of the present year and the previous year) also gets displayed.
I want details of only RATNG (500KC2) to be displayed, but only of the present year and the previous year, that is 2013900054, 2012520109 (ENQNO).
Other than 500KC2 RATNG, no other RATNG must be displayed.
The RATNG=500KC2 is also present for ENQNO=2011540036 , 2006900072. But I dont want these to be displayed.
I want only the data or details of the present year and the previous year to be displayed or populated with respect to the given RATNG.
Can You Help me or tell me what do i do for this?
Hope I'm clear with my question!!
If my question is not clear, let me know plz.
Thank You.
Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.1.0 - Production
Oracle forms 6i.

On key-exeqry you have to program. Delete all other trigger codings for checking your condition.
It dint work on key-exeqry.
I tried key-exeqry on form trigger, block (enqacmdtl) and also on field(:enqacmdtl.enqno) , but none of them worked.
It did not display the message.
I have a 'PUSH-BUTTON:EXEC_QUERY.
For EXEC_QUERY, Trigger : WHEN_BUTTON_PRESSED;
I added the following code:
if to_number(substr(:enqacmdtl.enqno,1,4))<to_number(to_char(add_months(sysdate,-12),'YYYY')) then
     message('The Rating is not present for the present year and the previous year');message(' ',no_acknowledge);
     raise form_trigger_failure;
else
     execute_query;
end if;
It is working fine and the message is being displayed.
But again I have a new problem and that is;
On the field :enqacmdtl.enqno, when i enter the '2013%' and press 'EXEC_QUERY', it works fine.
but when i enter '2006%' and press 'EXEC_QUERY', it shows the following error
FRM-50016: Legal characters are 0-9 - +E. It does not display the message also.
but when i enter the complete number, '2006580002', then it works fine , that is it displays the message (The Rating is not present for the present year and the previous year).
The problem is because of '%', only when i put in the restricted data (which does not satisfy where condition).
How do i solve this?
Thank You Priyasagi.

There is an inconsistency between the authentication mode of target web application and the source web application after migrating to claims

I've had my farm upgraded from SP2010 to SP2013 for over 6 months now and all is well, however, I was refreshing my staging environment from production and I noticed that one of the databases still shows these errors when I run test-spcontentdatabase:
Category : Configuration
Error : False
UpgradeBlocking : False
Message : The [SharePoint Web App] web application is configured with claims authentication mode however the content database you are trying to attach is intended to be used against
a windows classic authentication mode.
Remedy : There is an inconsistency between the authentication mode of target web application and the source web application. Ensure that the authentication mode setting in upgraded web application is the
same as what you had in previous SharePoint 2010 web application. Refer to the link "http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=236865" for more information.
This doesn't make sense considering I converted the production web application to claims during the upgrade and then verified all sites were working with claims logins. I also verified that existing AD user identities were converted to claims by checking out
the database tables. Yet test-spcontentdatabase still thinks there is a mismatch here.
My farm is SP1 and no further CUs. The point of this particular refresh is so I can update to the November CUs in my test farm. Anyone else see this? Seems like it's a bug/safe to ignore because my stuff is working.
Thanks,
Aaron

See:
http://thesharepointfarm.com/2014/11/test-spcontentdatabase-classic-to-claims-conversion/
Trevor Seward
Follow or contact me at...
&nbsp&nbsp
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

I used to have a itunes account and made a new one which is this one but i noticed that i have 1.00 on my account now and the one from before. is their a way i can merge both my balances to buy the new angry birds game!??

I used to have a itunes account and made a new one which is this one but i noticed that i have 1.00 on my account now and the one from before. is their a way i can merge both my balances to buy the new angry birds game!??

Hi Jacob...
A $1.00 credit or an authorization hold ...
The $1.00 charge is just an "authorization hold" > iTunes Store & Mac App Store: About credit-card authorization holds that will be credited back to your account usually within 24 to 48 hours.
is their a way i can merge both my balances to buy the new angry birds game!??
If it's a $1 credit from a redeemed iTunes gift card, sorry, but Apple's policy states that Apple ID accounts cannot be merged > Frequently Asked Questions About Apple ID

Business rule put figures to the blocks not created earlier

Sometimes business rules put figures to the blocks that should have not been created yet. Business rules perform this activity without the usage of function (createnonmissingblk) which it should not. Please can someone tell me its reason?

It can be a sparse allocation that it is doing.
DATACOPY can create blocks
Sparse assignment can create blocks
@ALLOCATE can create blocks.
Regards
Celvin

HT1688 I am having issues get my email in one of my mail accounts so I tried to "DELETE" the whole account. But my phone will not delete a mail account. And the phone is getting really hot and battery was full 2 hours ago and now at 25%.

I am having issues get my email in one of my mail accounts so I tried to "DELETE" the whole account. But my phone will not delete a mail account. And the phone is getting really hot and battery was full 2 hours ago and now at 25%.

Well, you don't say what happens when you try to delete the account. So I don't know what else to recommend. However, if your phone is not charging, is that the mains charger or the computer USB? Also, if it not showing any change to battery percentage, then something is wrong with the software. The next step in user troubleshooting after the reset is a restore from backup. However, considering the condition of the phone right now, I would be more than willing to say your backup is going to be corrupt. But you can try. If that does not fix the device, then you restore as new, not from a backup. If the phone works, then you can try restoring the backup again, but if it messes up, you are going to have to restore as new again. If the restore as new does not work, then you need to make an appointment at the Genius Bar or Authorized Apple Service Provider to get the hardware checked.

Business Rules: Account transformation and the source YEAR / PERIOD

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for