Cache Problem in value mapping

Hello All,
I have done some changes in the Value mapping table , activated it and checked the cache also , its upto date.I have verified through cache monitoring in run time workbench also..
But when i ran the transaction am not getting the expected result.
Can anybody help me in this issue..Is anyone faced this type of problem?
Regards
Venkatesh

Hi
>In Mapping while doing the Value mapping,in that value mapping what are the names which you maintained under sender schema and sender agency should be the same names while maintaining the value mapping in ID from Menu>Tools-->value Mapping.
-->I think the issue is not with the Cache, and In your communication channels for sender and receiver under IDENTIFIERS tab maintain the Sender schema and sender agency(Names should be same as in IR)for sender Channel and maintain the Receiver schema and Receiver agency for Receiver channel.(Names should be same as in IR).
This might solve your problem and on value mapping search SDN there is simple BLOG given by Praveen Kumar.
Thanks

Similar Messages

Problem in value mapping in POSDM configuration!

Hi Experts,
                          I am sending data from POS to POSDM. I hav used standard name spaces like GM store Connectivity, BI and Store Connectivity 2.0. I hav also done settings in ID . Made a File adapter and RFC adapter and RD, ID, SA and RA settings.
Data from Sourse: GMTLogTransaction_out is going to the RFC :/POSDW/CREATE_TRANSACTIONS_EXT .
So I hope users can Understand I hav used standard mapping.
Now the issue is in the source structure a perticular field called TENDER ID is mapped with Target Field :Tender Code.
But there is a value mapping in between.
The name of the source Agency is IXREtailPOSLogRetailTransactionTenderID and schema is IXRetailPOSLogRetailTransactionTenderIDSchema and
The name of the Target Agency is POSDWTENDERTYPECODE and schema is POSDWTENDERTYPECODESCHEMA.
    And the Value mapping Context is : http://sap.com/xi/XI.
The problem is I can see this , but I cant assign any value as it is in disabled mode in Messege mapping.
Again In the ID I cannot see this Value mapping , which I expected to see and maniputale.
   experts, please tell me hw to I use this manipulate / incert some values so taht the input when 01 becomes 3101 at output.
If any doubts/ querioes, pls revert back.Please note , I am using all standard components in IR.
Regards,
Arnab .

Hi Arnab / Abhijith,
I am also going to work on the similar kind of requirement which u guys have worked.
Pos( third Party)->PI>POSDM-->IS-Retail ( Inbound)
IS-Retail-> PI->POS( third Party) ( Outbound)
Appreciate if you could help me with some clarifications..
1) What transactions we can update to POSDM..?
2) Does we need to POST all POS transactions first to POS DM and then IS-Retail ( Inbound).?
If that is the case, once transactions posted in POSDM, does we need to do any settings to post idocs automatically to Retail system .. (OR) do we need to develop interface again from POSDM>PI>IS-Retail.( please clarify).
Please suggest .. is it feasable to post only Non aggregated data directly to POSDM and Aggregated Sales ,FI , GRNs to directly to ECC.( Based on client requirement ).
Awaiting for your suggestions.. Please suggest the best appraoch
Thanks & Regards,
Suman

Cache update in value mapping replication

Could anyone let me know when value mapping replication of mass data is done , the updated values in the java runtime cache that we can view in RWB->Cache Monitoring->Mapping Runtime Cache - are they deleted on system restart or are persisted somewhere.Is it only cached in Java memory and after restart we need to re invoke the scenario again to update the same.
Regards
Subhro

Hi,
You can refer the following post which talks about the same issue.
Re: Value Mapping Considerations for significantly high input
Also, go through this link for value mapping replication
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/2a/9d2891cc976549a9ad9f81e9b8db25/content.htm
Regards

Problem in value mapping

hi experts,
i am trying to do value mapping.i have done all configuration according to this link
http://sap-xi.com/sap-xi-tutorial-value-mapping.html
but i am not getting the expected results in target file . means the data is not getting changed as per the value mapping.
help me on this .
thanks
Anup
Edited by: anup kumar banerjee on Oct 27, 2011 1:33 PM

are you getting any error?
What is the behavior?
do refer this guide - http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/00ee347e-aabb-2a10-b298-d15a1ebf43c5?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true

Agency error on Value Mapping in 7.1.

Hi,
I'm facing a problem with value mapping using message mapping. The problem is that i can only choose as a Source/Target Agency the SenderParty/ReceiverParty but I can not use sender/receiver business system .
Does anyone knows why? I'm using as Agencies the bussines system, so when I use the Party, the mapping program trhows an exeption.
Thanks in advance,
Ariel

Ok, Problem Solved.
I Used SenderService ; ReceiverService insead of SenderParty; ReceiverParty.
Cheers,
Ariel

Value Mapping Replication for Mass Data - Performance Issues

Hi All,
We are looking into Value Mapping Replication for Mass Data. We have done this for less number of fields.
Now we might have to have 15,000 records in the cache for the Value Mapping. I am not sure how this would effect the Java Cache and Java Engine as a whole.
There might be a situation where we will have to leave the 15K records in the cache table on Java Engine...
Are there any parameters that we can look into just to see how this hits the performance.
Any links/ guidance in the right direction might help me..
reg

Naveen,
Check jins reply in this thread (they have done with API and without API using graphical but still some issues):
Value mapping performance using LookUp API
---Satish

EAI Value Maps

HI,
I need to understand how we use the EAI value Maps for mapping values for external System. I am using Siebel 8.0 and need to map values for 2 fields before sending the SOAP message using Outbound Web Service. I can send it and receive the response but the values currently are same in both the systems. Hence I need to understand how I can use Data Maps/EAI values maps for solving the mapping problem.

EAI Value Maps can be used for data mapping feature while interfacing with an external application. If you anticipate that the value may be different in future or even it remains the same - to build in flexiility in your solution you can use EAI Value Maps.
I'll try to explain through an example here. Let us consider example from Quote/Order Mgmt functionality - assume that you've to send your quote/order data to an external application for processing. In the quote/order line item you have Product field with value say Desktop However the external application refers to it by PC . In this case before sending the quote/order data out to the external application we've to perform mapping. This is where EAI Value Maps can help us.
Under Administration - Integration --> EAI Value Maps screen, create a record as follows,
Direction = Siebel Outbound
Type = <define a type value - think of it as an identifier> say MY_PRODUCT
Siebel Value = Desktop
External System Value = PC
The EAI value map so defined can be used in the script (business service) as follows -
var sProd = oBC.GetFieldValue("Product");
var sEAIMap = EAIGetValueMap("MY_PRODUCT","Siebel Outbound","");
var sExtVal = sEAIMap.Translate("Desktop"); //sExtVal should return PC
Note: You need to include eaisiebel.js in the declaration section of the business service

Siebel EAI Value Maps

HI,
I need to understand how we use the EAI value Maps for mapping values for external System. I am using Siebel 8.0 and need to map values for 2 fields before sending the SOAP message using Outbound Web Service. I can send it and receive the response but the values currently are same in both the systems. Hence I need to understand how I can use Data Maps/EAI values maps for solving the mapping problem.

EAI value maps are conceptually similar to LOVs, except that they are purpose built for use in mapping values between systems. I would suggest going through the Siebel bookshelf in order to gain an in-depth understanding. Here's a link to get you started:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B40099_02/books/EAI4/EAI4_DataMapUSScripts28.html#wp134444
Once you have read the basics, you will come to realize that depending on how you've configured your application you can use the mentioned functions in both WFPs and scripts by directly calling them or using Data Maps.
To specifically answer your question, here's the process:
a) Define the mappings (Eg. IN for external system = +91 for Siebel)
b) Define direction - Incoming/ Outgoing (optional but useful)
c) Create the mappings within Siebel EAI Value Maps Screen making sure you have, like in LOVs, a specific type defined for the mapping (E.g. Back Office Phone Numbers)
d) Use one of the available Value Map functions (See link above for the description of each of them) either in data maps or scripts to obtain the mapping value keying off the type field defined above
e) The rest is pretty much the routine stuff (convert to XML and post/ call adapter or whatever)
Hope this makes sense and helps..
- Mayuresh

Caching problem w/ primary-foreign key mapping

I have seen this a couple of times now. It is not consistent enough to
create a simple reproducible test case, so I will have to describe it to you
with an example and hope you can track it down. It only occurs when caching
is enabled.
Here are the classes:
class C1 { int id; C2 c2; }
class C2 { int id; C1 c1; }
Each class uses application identity using static nested Id classes: C1.Id
and C2.Id. What is unusual is that the same value is used for both
instances:
int id = nextId();
C1 c1 = new C1(id);
C2 c2 = new C2(id);
c1.c2 = c2;
c2.c1 = c1;
This all works fine using optimistic transactions with caching disabled.
Although the integer values are the same, the oids are unique because each
class defines its own unique oid class.
Here is the schema and mapping (this works with caching disabled but fails
with caching enabled):
table t1: column id integer, column revision integer, primary key (id)
table t2: column id integer, column revision integer, primary key (id)
<jdo>
<package name="test">
<class name="C1" objectid-class="C1$Id">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-class-map" value="base">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="table" value="t1"/>
</extension>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-version-ind"
value="version-number">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="column" value="revision"/>
</extension>
<field name="id" primary-key="true">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-field-map" value="value">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="column" value="id"/>
</extension>
</field>
<field name="c2">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-field-map" value="one-one">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="column.id" value="id"/>
</extension>
</field>
</class>
<class name="C2" objectid-class="C2$Id">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-class-map" value="base">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="table" value="t2"/>
</extension>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-version-ind"
value="version-number">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="column" value="revision"/>
</extension>
<field name="id" primary-key="true">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-field-map" value="value">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="column" value="id"/>
</extension>
</field>
<field name="c1">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="dependent" value="true"/>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="inverse-owner" value="c2"/>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-field-map" value="one-one">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="table" value="t1"/>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="ref-column.id" value="id"/>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="column.id" value="id"/>
</extension>
</field>
</class>
</package>
</jdo>
Because the ids are known to be the same, the primary key values are also
used as foreign key values. Accessing C2.c1 is always non-null when caching
is disabled. With caching is enabled C2.c1 is usually non-null but sometimes
null. When it is null we get warnings about dangling references to deleted
instances with id values of 0 and other similar warnings.
The workaround is to add a redundant column with the same value. For some
reason this works around the caching problem (this is unnecessary with
caching disabled):
table t1: column id integer, column id2 integer, column revision integer,
primary key (id), unique index (id2)
table t2: column id integer, column revision integer, primary key (id)
<jdo>
<package name="test">
<class name="C1" objectid-class="C1$Id">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-class-map" value="base">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="table" value="t1"/>
</extension>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-version-ind"
value="version-number">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="column" value="revision"/>
</extension>
<field name="id" primary-key="true">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-field-map" value="value">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="column" value="id"/>
</extension>
</field>
<field name="c2">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-field-map" value="one-one">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="column.id" value="id2"/>
</extension>
</field>
</class>
<class name="C2" objectid-class="C2$Id">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-class-map" value="base">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="table" value="t2"/>
</extension>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-version-ind"
value="version-number">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="column" value="revision"/>
</extension>
<field name="id" primary-key="true">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-field-map" value="value">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="column" value="id"/>
</extension>
</field>
<field name="c1">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="dependent" value="true"/>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="inverse-owner" value="c2"/>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-field-map" value="one-one">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="table" value="t1"/>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="ref-column.id" value="id2"/>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="column.id" value="id"/>
</extension>
</field>
</class>
</package>
</jdo>
Needless to say, the extra column adds a lot of overhead, including the
addition of a second unique index, for no value other than working around
the caching defect.

Tom-
The first thing that I think of whenever I see a problem like this is
that the equals() and hashCode() methods of your application identity
classes are not correct. Can you check them to ensure that they are
written in accordance to the guidelines at:
http://docs.solarmetric.com/manual.html#jdo_overview_pc_identity_application
If that doesn't help address the problem, can you post the code for your
application identity classes so we can double-check, and we will try to
determine what might be causing the problem.
In article <[email protected]>, Tom Landon wrote:
I have seen this a couple of times now. It is not consistent enough to
create a simple reproducible test case, so I will have to describe it to you
with an example and hope you can track it down. It only occurs when caching
is enabled.
Here are the classes:
class C1 { int id; C2 c2; }
class C2 { int id; C1 c1; }
Each class uses application identity using static nested Id classes: C1.Id
and C2.Id. What is unusual is that the same value is used for both
instances:
int id = nextId();
C1 c1 = new C1(id);
C2 c2 = new C2(id);
c1.c2 = c2;
c2.c1 = c1;
This all works fine using optimistic transactions with caching disabled.
Although the integer values are the same, the oids are unique because each
class defines its own unique oid class.
Here is the schema and mapping (this works with caching disabled but fails
with caching enabled):
table t1: column id integer, column revision integer, primary key (id)
table t2: column id integer, column revision integer, primary key (id)
<jdo>
<package name="test">
<class name="C1" objectid-class="C1$Id">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-class-map" value="base">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="table" value="t1"/>
</extension>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-version-ind"
value="version-number">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="column" value="revision"/>
</extension>
<field name="id" primary-key="true">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-field-map" value="value">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="column" value="id"/>
</extension>
</field>
<field name="c2">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-field-map" value="one-one">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="column.id" value="id"/>
</extension>
</field>
</class>
<class name="C2" objectid-class="C2$Id">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-class-map" value="base">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="table" value="t2"/>
</extension>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-version-ind"
value="version-number">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="column" value="revision"/>
</extension>
<field name="id" primary-key="true">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-field-map" value="value">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="column" value="id"/>
</extension>
</field>
<field name="c1">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="dependent" value="true"/>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="inverse-owner" value="c2"/>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-field-map" value="one-one">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="table" value="t1"/>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="ref-column.id" value="id"/>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="column.id" value="id"/>
</extension>
</field>
</class>
</package>
</jdo>
Because the ids are known to be the same, the primary key values are also
used as foreign key values. Accessing C2.c1 is always non-null when caching
is disabled. With caching is enabled C2.c1 is usually non-null but sometimes
null. When it is null we get warnings about dangling references to deleted
instances with id values of 0 and other similar warnings.
The workaround is to add a redundant column with the same value. For some
reason this works around the caching problem (this is unnecessary with
caching disabled):
table t1: column id integer, column id2 integer, column revision integer,
primary key (id), unique index (id2)
table t2: column id integer, column revision integer, primary key (id)
<jdo>
<package name="test">
<class name="C1" objectid-class="C1$Id">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-class-map" value="base">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="table" value="t1"/>
</extension>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-version-ind"
value="version-number">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="column" value="revision"/>
</extension>
<field name="id" primary-key="true">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-field-map" value="value">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="column" value="id"/>
</extension>
</field>
<field name="c2">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-field-map" value="one-one">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="column.id" value="id2"/>
</extension>
</field>
</class>
<class name="C2" objectid-class="C2$Id">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-class-map" value="base">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="table" value="t2"/>
</extension>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-version-ind"
value="version-number">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="column" value="revision"/>
</extension>
<field name="id" primary-key="true">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-field-map" value="value">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="column" value="id"/>
</extension>
</field>
<field name="c1">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="dependent" value="true"/>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="inverse-owner" value="c2"/>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-field-map" value="one-one">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="table" value="t1"/>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="ref-column.id" value="id2"/>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="column.id" value="id"/>
</extension>
</field>
</class>
</package>
</jdo>
Needless to say, the extra column adds a lot of overhead, including the
addition of a second unique index, for no value other than working around
the caching defect.
Marc Prud'hommeaux [email protected]
SolarMetric Inc. http://www.solarmetric.com

Value Mapping Problem - Values not appearing in destination system

hello everyone,
Here's my scenario: XML > XI > IDOC
I have a problem with the ValueMapping and FixedValue function in XI. When I test the message in the Integration Repository, I don't get any problems (the value is converted appropriately), but when I view the IDOC in SAP, the value that is supposed to be in the field is missing.
When I check the payload in SXMB_MONI in XI, no conversion occurs. I have refreshed the caches, and everything seems to be fine. I don't know why the value mapping functions seem to have stopped working altogether. Will anyone be able to help me out with my problem?
Thanks in advance!
Glenn

Hi Glenn Bumanlag,
I think the values that you have given for source values (Agency and scheme)
and Target values (Agency and scheme) may be mismatching so kindly chek that...even i got the same error in the past..........
If you the this problem kindly change it accordingly and also refresh the cache once you that with this.........
Kindly follow the below mentioned link and check if you have followed these steps.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/00ee347e-aabb-2a10-b298-d15a1ebf43c5
Thanks
Sai
PS: kindly reward points if helpful

Value Mapping not in cache

Hi all,
I've ceated a value mapping table manually in the IB (Config) using the tool. I also created a VM Group.
However it is not picking up the new values and I can't find the VMG in the RWB Cache either....
Im only dealing with small number of entries so I don't need a mass reproduction...
Any help welcome..
cheers,
Eric

> I've ceated a value mapping table manually in the IB (Config) using the tool. I also created a VM Group.
> However it is not picking up the new values and I can't find the VMG in the RWB Cache either....
Hi,
Have you refreshed your cache (CPA & SXI_CACHE)?
Also clear the SLD Data Cache from Intergaration Dirtectory menu "Environment".
Try to run end-end scenario and see in MONI if there are corresponding values from VM. In general it never gives problem in comparsion to VM Replication.
Regards,
Sarvesh

Value mapping replication - java cache

i used value mapping replication and successfully loaded values to the java cache (i can see the in the cache monitoring but not in the configuration).
when i try to use a scenario with value mapping using the agencies and schemes which i loaded, the mapping doesn't work and i receive the same value that was entered.
what could be the problem?
P.S
i used the same groupid for each pair of source and target value when i loaded them. is that the right way?

Tomer,
what is the context that u used. Did you give the correct context in mapping as in Runtime Cache.
Regards,
Sudharshan N A

How to read Group ID from Value Mapping Context in Cache Monitoring ?

Hi friends,
    In RWB --> Cache Monitoring --> Integration Server (Java) -> (Search for Value Mapping Groups) in this each item is identified by Value Mapping Group (GroupID, Context, Identifier/Agency, Identifier/Scheme). Either we create Value Mapping Table in ID or replicate value mapping data directly from text file/SAP table etc., in run time cache, data will be identified in this manner.
    Now, our requirement is to delete a record the Cache for a particular context. Two operations provided by XI one is 'Delete' and another one is 'DeleteGroup'. When we use either of this, we should know GroupID. Suppose, I replicated some large amount of data from my text file in Runtime Cache. Value Mapping Table is like that IN --> India, US --> USA, AU --> Australia, EG --> Egypt. Now, I am required to write a program to get the input country code from user which is going to delete in the value mapping table like IN/AU.... For this, what logic we should follow in the program is, First we scan the value mapping table and find the record (country code) which is match with the input. Then find the GUID value for this record. Now we use the DeleteGroup Operation and pass this GUID and then delete the record.
    So, in essence, how to read the GUID from value mapping context.
    Friends, Kindly help me to do this.
Thanks in advance.
Jegatheeswaran P.

Did you get the way to read group id?

Cache not updated on Value Mapping Replication PI 7.1

Hi,
I already configure an scenario to do Value Mapping Replication on PI 7.1
I am sending the xml file thru an HTTP client and it seems to go all the way down. I have a "Processed Successfully" status in the moni but the thing is that I can not see any difference in the Cache at the RWB.
My receiver agreement uses the ValueMappingReplication interface to a CC of type XI.
Any ideas on what could be wrong?
Thanks in advance.
Luis

Hi Udo,
Your reply pointed me to the right direction.
In the RWB I found out that my group-id was in the wrong format, so to be sure, I used a function module called /OSP/GET_GUID. That way I generate a correct 32-bit group-id.
Now it works.
Thanks.
Luis.

No value mapping in Integration Directory, but they are in the cache

Hi,
I recently got acquainted with the fabulous world of value mappings in PI. Until now, FixValues did the trick for me, but now I have to modify the errors in someone else's work.
I read this article:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/00ee347e-aabb-2a10-b298-d15a1ebf43c5&overridelayout=true
and a bunch of other help.sap.com stuff and I still don't get a very specific thing in our system. When I check the cache from the runtime workbench, the values, agencies and what have you are all ok. However, when I go to Integration Directory, disregarding the fact that I don't have any values on the search helps for Agency and Scheme, which is quite weird, when I put the correct Agencies and Schemes, I don't get any value displayed, just blanks.
Why does this happen? Is it something wrong in the PI configuration or something that I don't see any value mapping there, altough they are in the cache?
Thanks in advance and best regards,
George

Hi ,
1. Create Value Mapping directly in ID (this cannot be seen in RWB, it can be only seen in ID)
*Just a corection we can see the value mappings created in Integration directory in RWB in cache monitoring.*
Just follow these steps to refresh your cache. you will no longer be able to see deleted Val mappings and newly created entries will also shown immediately.
1) Go to integration builder -- > Administration --> click on Runtime tab --> cache overview
You will find 2 things over there :
Value Mapping Group Cache
Value Mapping Value Cache
Refresh both of them. I hope it will work as it always work for me :).
Thanks
Inder

Cache Problem in value mapping

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for