Can't generate several foreign keys at a time

I thought we could generate a liste of foreign keys with a single wizard.
The order generated had been
ALTER TABLE WORKS ADD ( CONSTRAINT FK_WORKS_10 FOREIGN KEY (DEFAULT_JAVA_POST_EXECUTION,JAVA_EXECUTION,DEFAULT_JAVA_ANTE_EXECUTION) REFERENCES JAVA_PROC(GES_NUMBER))
In fact, each of these foreign keyx should have contained a different instance of ges_number which is the primary key of the source table.
I think I need to use as many wizard as I define different links. Do I?

The internal disk of the TC is HFS+ and has no file size limitation. up to the size of the disk. If you use Mac or Linux then the TC will have no file size limitation.
You are not using an external USB are you?? If so that should be formatted HFS+ as well.. windows can work fine to that in network share.
FAT32 will definitely have 4GB file issues.. that is the problem with FAT32.

Similar Messages

  • Can I create a foreign key when creating Business Components from Tables

    Hi,
    I would like to use ADF and JSF to create an application on our database. My problem is our database does not "conform". i.e. there are no foreign key constraints.
    When I create a "Business Component from Tables" view, can I put in my own joins between tables so enabling the use of the generated views?
    Jon L.

    View object instances show up in the data control palette once you've added them to your application module's data model.
    See these sections in the ADF Developer's Guide for more information:
    Section 2.6.3, "Using View Objects in the Application Module's Data Model" talks about using view object instance in the data model as part of the overview chapter.
    Section 4.5, "Understanding the Active Data Model" explains a little more about this
    Section 5.3, "Using a View Object in an Application Module's Data Model" shows how to do this.
    Chapter 10, "Overview of Application Module Data Binding" gives details on how the application and its view objects are exposed in the Data Control palette.
    You can find the guide on the ADF Learning Center on OTN.
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/adf/learnadf.html
    Look for the ADF Developer's Guide for Forms/4GL Developers.

  • Can i make exisitng Foreign key constraint deferrable?

    Hello, Is it possible to make the existing FK constraint deferrable? We can do this when we add New FK constraint. But i am not sure, we can make deferrable???
    scott@orcl> CREATE TABLE MASTER(id NUMBER(10));
    Table created.
    scott@orcl> CREATE TABLE child(id NUMBER(10), master_id NUMBER(10));
    Table created.
    scott@orcl>
    scott@orcl> ALTER TABLE master ADD PRIMARY KEY (id);
    Table altered.
    scott@orcl>
    scott@orcl> ALTER TABLE child ADD CONSTRAINT fk_master
    2 FOREIGN KEY (master_id)
    3 REFERENCES master(id)
    4 DEFERRABLE
    5 /
    Table altered.
    scott@orcl>
    scott@orcl> drop table child;
    Table dropped.
    scott@orcl> drop table master;
    Table dropped.
    scott@orcl>
    scott@orcl> CREATE TABLE MASTER(id NUMBER(10));
    Table created.
    scott@orcl> CREATE TABLE child(id NUMBER(10), master_id NUMBER(10));
    Table created.
    scott@orcl>
    scott@orcl> ALTER TABLE master ADD PRIMARY KEY (id);
    Table altered.
    scott@orcl>
    scott@orcl> ALTER TABLE child ADD CONSTRAINT fk_master
    2 FOREIGN KEY (master_id)
    3 REFERENCES master(id)
    4 /
    Table altered.
    scott@orcl> alter table child modify constraint
    2 fk_master deferrable;
    fk_master deferrable
    ERROR at line 2:
    ORA-00933: SQL command not properly ended
    scott@orcl>
    How can we make existing FK constraint as deferrable? Any help is appreciated....

    From Oracle doc
    Restrictions on Modifying Constraints
    Modifying constraints is subject to the following restrictions:
    You cannot change the state of a NOT DEFERRABLE constraint to INITIALLY DEFERRED.
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/statements_3001.htm#SQLRF01001

  • Data Modeler - how can I define a foreign key but disabled

    I am using SQL Developer Data Modeler Version 2.0.0 Build 570 on Mac OS X (Snow Leopard).
    When defining a foreign key constraint, is there a way to define it as disabled?
    When the DDL script is generated, the constraint is defined but it is always enabled, I want it to be disabled.
    This is possible in the Jdeveloper data modeler, but I am missing the method to do this in SQL Developer Data Modeler.
    Any help appreciated.

    OraTone wrote:
    I am using SQL Developer Data Modeler Version 2.0.0 Build 570 on Mac OS X (Snow Leopard).
    When defining a foreign key constraint, is there a way to define it as disabled?
    When the DDL script is generated, the constraint is defined but it is always enabled, I want it to be disabled.
    This is possible in the Jdeveloper data modeler, but I am missing the method to do this in SQL Developer Data Modeler.
    Any help appreciated.Create it and then disable it afterwards if you're using the Connections window to create them.
    If you are generating the DDL edit the ENABLED keyword to DISABLED

  • Can we generate the same key with the same password???

    Hi everyone,
    Is it at all possible to generate the same key? I have a program that takes a user password, creates a key. And this is done in a loop for 5 times. I just wanted to see if the keys that are generated will be the same for the same password. But the keys that are generated are different.
    Does anyone have any idea why this would happen?
    My Environment
    jdk1.2.2
    jce1.2.1
    My class is very simple as is as follows
    import java.security.*;
    public class SecureStuff {
    static
    Security.addProvider(new com.sun.crypto.provider.SunJCE());
    public SecureStuff()
    try {
    Key secretKey = null;
    for (int i = 0; i < 6; i++){
    javax.crypto.spec.DESedeKeySpec spec = new javax.crypto.spec.DESedeKeySpec("PASSWORDPASSWORDPASSWORD".getBytes());
    javax.crypto.SecretKeyFactory desFactory = javax.crypto.SecretKeyFactory.getInstance("DESede");
    secretKey = desFactory.generateSecret(spec);
    System.out.println("key generated:"+secretKey.getEncoded());
    } catch (Exception e){
    e.printStackTrace();
    public static void main(String[] args) {
    SecureStuff securestuff = new SecureStuff();
    The Output
    C:\> java SecureStuff
    key generated:[B@eb7989c5
    key generated:[B@e96189c5
    key generated:[B@e99589c5
    key generated:[B@e8d989c5
    key generated:[B@ef4189c5
    key generated:[B@eff589c5
    Please can anyone help me..
    Thank you very very much.
    ...geetha

    Hi,
    I was wondering if you have found a solution to your question.. I justed started working with JCE and have to implement the same functionality. basically I am trying to Encrypt passwords stored in the DB and then when a user logs in, I encrypt his password and compare with the stored password in the DB. For me to do this I have to be sure I can get the same key generated for each encryption.
    Also, do you have any examples I can look at or any recommendation on books that explain this subject (JCE) well.
    Thanks
    Chi

  • How can I export several versions at the same time?

    Greetings -
    I'm looking for something that I may just be missing, and hoping someone here can point me in the right direction.
    Basically, I'd like to be able to select an image in my library and export several versions at the same time. For example, I select a photo and export JPG, TIFF and PSD versions in one shot without having to run three separate export requests - essentially a batch action. I can't imagine that this isn't built in already - I'm just assuming that I'm missing something obvious.
    Thanks in advance for any advice anyone might have.
    John.

    Fwiw, I've not seen this requested before.
    This kind of Export option is very typical, Kirby, when the rendering of the exported version will take a long time, for example for video or audio. Then you can share several formats at once, to render a version suitable for the web, for viewing on the computer, or the iPhone at the same time. That is really useful, if you render a movie at a full HD resolution and don't have to do it again for an iPhone/iPod version.
    QuickTime 7 does this for the "File > Export for Web" option, for example. You can get three versions of your final movie at the same time.
    And I just checked, the new iMovie Theater does this as well, when sharing a movie to the Theater:
    When you add a movie, trailer, or clip to the Theater, iMovie creates versions of your movie tailored for local playback, playback on an iOS device, and streaming.
    Come to think about it - exporting a webpage from Aperture will also export thumbnail sized images plus a larger version for downloading.

  • Can I generate a report file in 'real-time​'?

    Hello all,
    My question concerns reports in Teststand. Currently, the report is not generated and no results are saved until the entire execution is complete. This is OK if there are no problems during the execution (which can take several days), such as the PC locking up, etc. If this happens, the all the results are lost!
    This has happened twice now, so I was wondering if there's a way to set it up to record the results as the test is run, and generate the report file at the same time. Basically, so if a problem crops up, we can reboot the machine, or restart the testing, and all the results we had before the problem will be recorded.
    I'm probably making this way more difficult than it needs to be!
    Thanks in adva
    nce,
    Dave Neumann
    [email protected]

    Dave,
    I am doing all our report generation in text mode, as I didn't want to use the html format for legacy reasons. Without looking at your implementation I cannot say why it's doing what it is... However, I know that I talked with NI Tech Support when I implemented this example over a year ago, so they should be able to help with getting the example to work with the default process model. You should be able to set some break points to see what's happening in the process model after each step to see why you're not seeing any results on the fly. I do remember that it required some copying and pasting from several sections in the process model. Once you get it running properly, stepping through it should give you a good idea of where you'd want to ad
    d a routine that writes to a log file as the tests are conducted.

  • CAN I SEND SEVERAL PDFs AT THE SAME TIME ?

    I NEED TO SEND ALL THE CHAPTERS OF A BOOK, WHICH ARE ALREADY  PDFs, AT THE SAME TIME. HOW CAN i DO THIS?

    I would suggest using a Cloud service such Dropbox , SugarSync, MyFlare, 4 Shared, One Drive. Create a Share Link and copy the link into an email.

  • Questions about creating a foreign key on a large table

    Hello @ll,
    during a database update I lost a foreign key between two tables. The tables are called werteart and werteartarchiv_pt. Because of its size, werteartarchiv_pt is a partitioned table. The missing foreign key was a constraint on table werteartarchiv_pt referencing werteart.
    Some statistics about the sizes of the mentioned tables:
    werteart 22 MB
    werteartarchiv_pt 223 GB
    werteartarchiv_pt (Index) 243 GB
    I tried to create the foreign key again, but it failed with the following error (Excuses for the german error message):
    sqlplus ORA-00604: Fehler auf rekursiver SQL-Ebene 1
    sqlplus ORA-01652: Temp-Segment kann nicht um 128 in Tablespace TEMPS00 erweitert
    The statement I used:
    alter table werteartarchiv_pt
    add constraint werteartarchiv_pt_fk1
    foreign key (schiene, werteartadresse, merkmale)
    references werteart (schiene, werteartadresse, merkmale)
    on delete cascade
    initially deferred deferrable;
    So the problem seems to be, that Oracle needs a lot of temporary tablespace to generate the foreign key and I do not know how much and why.
    My questions now are, and hopefully someone is here, who can answer all or a part of it:
    1) Why does Oracle need temporary tablespace to create the foreign key? The foreign key uses the same columns like the primary key.
    2a) Is it possible to tweak the statement without using the temporary tablespace?
    2b) If it is not possible to avoid the usage of the temporary tablespace, is there a formula how to calculate the needed temporary tablespace?
    3) Is it possible to modify data in the tables while the foreign key is created or is the whole table locked during the process?
    Any help or hint is appreciated.
    Regards,
    Bjoern

    RollinHand wrote:
    My questions now are, and hopefully someone is here, who can answer all or a part of it:
    1) Why does Oracle need temporary tablespace to create the foreign key? The foreign key uses the same columns like the primary key.Because it's validating the data to ensure the foreign key won't be violated. If you had specified ENABLE NOVALIDATE when creating it then the existing data in the table wouldn't need to be checked and the statement should complete instantly (future data added would be checked by the constraint).
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28310/general005.htm
    Search for "Enable Novalidate Constraint State"

  • Publish: dropping index when it is used for foreign key constraint enforcement

    Hi,
    I'm trying to update a target schema from a reference database via Publish. Among the changes to apply, there's an index that needs to be dropped. Since it's linked to a foreign key constraint, it cannot be deleted unless the foreign key is temporarily dropped
    (I saw somewhere that disabling the foreign key should be enough but it doesn't seem to work either).
    Since there are other changes to be made on the same table, this foreign key also has to be dropped before the script can delete the table and re-create it. This part of the script is correctly generated. The problem is that this part appears after the 'DROP
    INDEX' instruction.
    So when generating the update script, SSDT tries to drop the index BEFORE dropping the foreign key. And I can't drop the foreign key in my custom pre-deployment script, otherwise the update script would fail when trying to delete it again.
    Shouldn't SSDT be smart enough to drop the constraint before the index? Is it a bug or did I forget to set an option? If it's not a bug, what can I do apart from doing it manually?
    Thank you for your help

    Hi Elsa,
    That sounds like a bug. Could you please file a Connect issue for this at
    https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/CreateFeedback.aspx using the category "Developer Tools (SSDT, BIDS, etc.)"? We're trying to track all bugs through
    Connect so that you can tell when we have fixed the issue and we can request more information.
    A workaround for this issue might be to write a pre-deployment script for your project to drop the foreign key prior to deployment. A pre-deployment script can be added to your project by right-clicking on the
    project in solution explorer and then clicking on Add > Script... and selecting Pre-Deployment Script from the list.
    Thanks!

  • PRIMARY KEY(MASTER)를 REFERENCE하는 FOREIGN KEY 찾는 SQL

    제품 : ORACLE SERVER
    작성날짜 : 2004-03-12
    PRIMARY KEY(MASTER)를 REFERENCE하는 FOREIGN KEY 찾는 SQL
    ========================================================
    $sqlplus sys/manager(SYS user 로 login 함)
    sql> select c.name constraint_name
    from dba_objects a,
    cdef$ b,
    con$ c
    where a.object_name = 'TABLE_NAME'
    and a.object_id = b.robj#
    and b.con# = c.con#
    /

    Hello again,
    May be I was not clear enough.
    Scenario 1: We use the master-detail form as is with the default oolbar. In this case, the user can insert the detail records one by one without needing the primary-foreign key value since this is handled by default.
    Once we save the form (commit_form), I use the pre-insert trigger to get the master block primary key generated from the sequence and since the detail block key is copied from this value, both are saved correctly and it is the end of the story.
    Scenario 2: As explained in the initial post, the user will populate the detail records one by one by clicking on the -INSERT DETAIL- button and hence has a window where he can insert the detail info and then be brought back to the master-detail form every time he enters a new detail record.
    The problem here is that I can't generate the primary key for the master block since the client has the following requirement:
    The user can always change his mind and not complete, meaning save the form, his process
    As such, the key should be generated in the last step before Commit.

  • New SQL Developer Data Modeler : name of attributes of foreign key

    Hi,
    with designer the name of column of foreign key was the " short name of entity/table master" + "_" + "the name of column attribute of the master table" .
    Instead in the sql developer D.M. the system uses directly the name of the column/attribute of the master table and if the name exists in the slave table it uses a number to distinguish them .
    So, if i have a table with short name gp and a primmary key id and a slave table with even a column id ,
    with the D.M i'll have in the slave table a column named id2; in the designer instead the new column is gp_id .
    Is possible to have the same behavior of designer even in the SQL Developer Data Modeler ?
    Regards
    Gianpaolo Giliberto

    Hi Gianpaolo,
    the columns of foreign keys are generated without the short name of master tablehow do you define that short name? Table and column have property "Abbreviation" - short name should be set there. You need also to set naming templates in "General Options>Naming Standard>Templates". Templates will be used when foreign key is created or you can apply them in Table dialog or for whole relational model using pop-up menu in the browser.
    no foreign key index is generated on foreign key columns I assume, you want it for DDL generation only - this is controlled in "General Options>DDL"
    Regards,
    Philip

  • Foreign key Mapping based on Data - in SQL Developer Data modeler

    Team
    Do SQL Developer Data modeler supports Foreign Key mapping based on the Data in the Schema rather defined at the DDL ? For e.g if we implement a Objects Relation ship mapping in Data base, we don't define Foreign keys at table creation.
    Toad does this feature through "AUTOMATIC FOREIGN KEYS MAPPING IN TOAD DATA MODELER" more info at (http://toadworld.com/Blogs/tabid/67/EntryId/905/Automatic-Foreign-Keys-Mapping-in-Toad-Data-Modeler.aspx)
    any one know how to implement through some scripts also helps me
    Regards
    Raj

    If you have table PKs defined and the candidate columns match those PK columns, then you can use the Discover Foreign Keys utility. Right mouse over the relational model name (node) in the left browser. It is about half way down the menu. I did a blog post about it last week on kentgraziano.com.

  • How to choose the right foreign key to be used when processing a dimension

    Hi,
    here is the problem I'm facing : I need to create a dimension in my cube from the table dimDocumentVente.
    Here are the relations between my tables in SQLServer.
    dimDocumentVente
        ID
        ID Article
        ID GroupeComptaProduitTVA
    dimArticle
       ID
       ID GroupeComptaProduitTVA
    dimGroupeComptaProduit
       ID
       Code
    with Foreign keys between :
    - IDGroupeComptaProduit  in dimDocumentVente and ID in dimGroupeComptaProduit
    - IDGroupeComptaProduit in dimArticle and ID in dimGroupeComptaProduit
    - IDArticle in dimDocumentVente and ID in dimArticle
    In this dimension (based on dimDocumentVente), I add the information ID from dimGroupeComptaProduit.
    When I process the dimension, I see in SQL Profiler that the relation between the 2 tables is done using dimArticle, which is not what I want to do. I want to use the relation which is between dimGroupeComptaProduit and dimDocumentVente.
    Is there a way to tell SSAS, that I want to use the foreign key between dimDocumentVente and dimGroupeComptaProduit to calculate this attribute ?
    From the user point of view, the information contained in the table dimGroupeComptaProduit contains information linked the the VAT rate. This information is linked to the items in our ERP (Dynamics NAV), and when we create a new order, this information is
    copied in the order line and the user has the possibility to override it. So in the cube, it's interesting to both analyse from the value stored in the item and the value stored in the order. That's the reason why !
    Thanks in advance for your help.

    Thanks for your answer but unfortunately, that's not exactly what I'm looking for.
    I mean, I want to create a dimension based on table dimDocumentVente in which I want to include the information "code" coming from dimGroupeComptaProduitTVA table.
    Please see below.
    As you may notice, I have several foreign keys.
    When I process the dimension, I see in SQL profiler that SQLServer is using the relation between dimDocumentVente and dimArticle plus between dimArticle and dimGroupeComptaProduitTVA to process my dimension. It's necessary for me that instead, it uses directly the
    relation between dimDocumentVente and dimGroupeComptaProduitTVA. Is there a way to change this  ?
    Thanks.

  • Foreign key primary relationship

    Can we create foreign key on composite primary key? how?
    Edited by: 854624 on Apr 25, 2011 8:30 PM

    Hi,
    854624 wrote:
    But can we relate one column as foreign key with composite primary key ?Sorry, I don't understand what you're asking. Please post a concrete example, like
    "If I have these tables: CREATE TABLE ...
    and they contain this data: ...
    can I have a foreign key constraint that would allow these statements: INSERT ...
    but not allow these: INSERT ...
    because ...?"
    In the referenced table, the column for a foreign key must be unique. If column_a is unique, then it can be part of a composite primary key, but it doesn't make any sense. if column_a is unique, why isn't column_a, all by itself, the primary key?

Maybe you are looking for