Can you edit 24 Frames Per Second ( 24p ) in iMovie 6?

Does anybody know?
I see that when you "Create a new project" you can choose several options, including 1080i .. but can you pick 24p somehow?
FCP can .. is this too much to ask for iMovie 6?
FCP seems to hard to use for a beginner .. but why can't we shoot 24p and edit with iMovie....

The 24p just looks so good to the eye
sure, but mainly because of usage of "progressive" instead of interlacing...
the framerate has very little effect on the "psychological" perception of a movie; the main issues of "movie look" are:
* progressive - as said
* blurr - video pics are mostly "crystal clear", a film-camera has looong shutter-times, compared to a consumer DVcam (which in bright sunlight switches to 1/2000sec)
* fps - PAL has 25, which is close to movie.. we have more motion-blurrs then NTSC videos.... NTSC could look "too sharp"...-
* depth of field - film has a much smaller area of dof
* different color scheme - ..ehm, to be honest, .. too techie for me
as mentioned above, you get (some for free) many plug-ins for FCP/E, to accomplish some similiar effect with standard 30/25i material... for the classical "wedding video" I use JES Deinterlacer, deinterlacing the final project before makign a DVD...- looks great too...
but for sure, not as good as done with your 24p-camera-beast!!
besides:
How did you judge pic quality?
in case, you connected camera to TV... the camcorder did convert from 24 to 30fps ... ... as said, progressive looks great... but can be accomplished much easier.

Similar Messages

Can you edit video from an EVO on IMovie?..

Can you edit video from an EVO on IMovie?..

I think you'll have to convert it to another format first, check out:
http://htc-evo-4g-video.converter-mac-os.com/htc-evo-4g-video-converter-for-mac/
http://www.computeruser.com/forum/electronics-/-gadgets/4921-import-htc-evo-vide o-to-imovie-convert-htc-evo-v.html

What is the most Frames Per Second NI-CAN can do?

My goal is to send 1000 Frames per Second on my CAN bus using the NI-CAN PCI 2 slot card I have. However the closest I have been able to do is 666 frames per second. This is sending 8 frames every 12 MS using an edited readmult example. Is there a way to do this with writemult? Or is there a hardware limit that I am trying to go past?
What can I mess with to get more frames? Increase Baudrate? Decrease the size of the frames? (I've tried both of those)
Other questions that should probably go in other posts (Frame API):
Is there a way to send/read the frames at the bit-level? I have found ways to manipulate Arbitration ID, Remote Frame, Data Length, and Data, but there are several other bits in a frame.
Is there a way to send a bad frame, one that would raise/cause an error frame?

Yes, I did break 1,000 Frames Per Second. I got up to 1,714 and 1,742 using two different methods. This is at 250 kbps, if you used 500 or 1 Mbps, you could get more frames. If you have 125 kbps, you might not be able to break 1,000 Frames per Second.
ncWriteMult is the key. You can load 512 frames in a queue at a time. I would put 256 on at a time and check to see if there was less than 256 frames left in the queue and if there was, load it up, that way the queue would never be empty. I went about it 2 ways, one was using ncGetAttribute to determine space left, and that got the faster method, however, I was also trying to read the messages to verify that it worked, and I had problems with logging every frame. It would also send the first 40 ncWriteMults quickly, as if the queue it was filling was much larger than 512.
The other way, was using trial and error to determine how many MS to sleep before writing the next batch of 256 frames. There are variables outside of my control that determined the time it would take and it would vary a few ms. I wanted a stable environment that could send forever without filling the queue so I went with a value that would wait 2 or 3 ms, depending on conditions before writing again. The value I used was 142 ms, I think. Your Mileage May Vary.
There is also a way to do some error handling that I did not try to utilize. Instead of the process crashing, there is a way to tell it to wait if this error is returned. That might be the best way for me to implement what I wanted to do, but I was assigned another task before I tried to get that to work.
There is a timing element in ncWriteMult's documentation I didn't look into very much, but that would space the frames out and could send 1,000 frames a second evenly distributed, instead of sending them as quickly as possible, wait some ms then send another batch.
If anyone could link us, or provide some code snippets of the error handling, or proper usage of ncGetAttribue, or some way to read faster, that would be greatly appreciated.

FMR with 30 Frames per Second (Captivate 5.5 Win)

Hi everybody,
I am creating an online YouTube video for a presentation of our product. I am not very sure how to setup the FMR to capture in 30 frames per second. If it is possible where can I configure these settings?
thank you a lot
Rado

Welcome to our community
FMR isn't the best way to capture, but if that's your goal...
30 FPS is the default setting in Captivate unless you have told it otherwise. If you want to double-check, click Edit > Preferences > Project > Publish Settings.
Cheers... Rick
Helpful and Handy Links
Captivate Wish Form/Bug Reporting Form
Adobe Certified Captivate Training
SorcerStone Blog
Captivate eBooks

Nikon D90 footage: Can you edit natively in Final Cut?

Just wondering if anyone has been using the new Nikon D90 to shoot video, and then importing the footage natively into FCP6. The camera's video-recording format, from what I have read, is 720p24, an .avi file, and a Motion JPEG codec.
I see that in the settings for a Final Cut sequence, you can choose 1280X720 frame size, a true 24 frames per second rate, and either a Motion JPEG A or Motion JPEG B compressor. It seems like with these settings, you could put your footage into the timeline and not have to render it before editing . . . unless the .avi file format goofs it up. Can you edit .avi in Final Cut natively, or do you have to use a Quicktime file?
Any workflow advice much appreciated,
Jim

No, sorry to say, I do not own the camera. And in looking around the web for an original, as-shot-by-the-D90 clip to experiment with, the only ones I found were at this site:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08090101nikond90samplegallery.asp
They were billed as: D90 sample movie 1 • original .AVI format • 21 seconds, 35.7 MB
and: D90 sample movie 3 • original .AVI format • 9 seconds, 24.5 MB
So I downloaded them, imported them into Final Cut, and they showed up with settings in the browser of: 1280X720 and 24 fps (so far so good) but then a compressor setting of "Apple OpenDML JPEG" rather than what I was expecting, Motion JPEG, which is what the D90 spec is. If the clip was truly "original .AVI format," I would have expected the compressor setting to be Motion JPEG.
Then, when I tried to change the sequence settings to Apple OpenDML JPEG, I found that there is no such setting. My thought was if the size, 1280X720, the frame rate, 24, and the compressor settings all matched, you could edit natively. And when I dragged the clip into the timeline, it did not give me a dialogue box asking if I would like the sequence settings to match the clip, the way it does with some footage.
Yes, you can render the clip and then edit it, but it would be great to avoid that step. Anyway, I got the red bar in the timeline with every combination of sequence compressor settings I tried, maybe 10 of them.
So maybe the answer is some time is needed for Final Cut to support the D90's Motion JPEG files natively, though I believe that is an older codec. Too bad the D90 does not record in something like DVCPRO HD. For a $1000 camera, the image quality looks pretty good, and the shallow depth of field really turned my head. I was thinking it might be a cheap Red Rock or Letus killer.
Thanks for the input,
Jim

Feature request: Frames Per Second info for clips / Warning when exporting

I know that this may not be the right place to post, but I think many of us users would agree that this feature would be useful in iMovie. Especially for new users who are not even familiar with terms like "frame rate".
Let's assume you import a video from your digital camera. You are not an expert in this field, so you edit the video in iMovie. Then you export it using QuickTime. The final video is jerky... and this can be due to incorrect frame rate settings.
It would be nice if iMovie provided some warning if you are trying to import video at a different frame rate setting than your original video source. Just a pop-up saying "Your video was recorded 29.97 frames per second (FPS) and you are trying to export it into 25 FPS. This can cause some playback issues."
Maybe even suggest the correct frame rate setting for the export. Apple's software is always trying to make things easier. I think regular users do not even know about "frame rates", so it might be a good idea to warn them.
Also, how can you tell what FPS are your sources in iMovie? There is no way to tell what FPS was the clip recorded in. To find out, you have to go back into iPhoto, then drag the clip into QuickTime and only there you can select "Get Info" and find the recorded FPS for the specific clip.
This seems like a lot of trouble to go through, just to find out a very basic information about the clip.
I would like to see some functionality like this added to iMovie. I think many of us users would welcome this feature.
What do you guys think?

Click iMovie/Provide Feedback. That will send your enhancement request to the developers.

Calculating Frames Per Second Accurately

I tried searching the forums for suggestions or code used to calculate FPS accurately... But was ultimately unsuccessful.
I think I have a pretty basic understanding of how it works... but I'm still left wondering if there's a better... or correct way of attacking the problem.
What I started out doing is taken a pre-cycle time sample using System's currentTimeMillis method, followed by the main parts I'm executing in my program and then took a second time sample. I subtracted the post-cycle from the pre-cycle to get the time... and it occurred to me that the currentTimeMillis is not exactly reliable. As it says in the API, "For example, many operating systems measure time in units of tens of milliseconds," when discussing that method.
I then noticed the nanoTime method and decided to use that.
It quite honestly seems to work perfectly for what I'm trying to accomplish.
I pretty much used the same steps as before.
But now my problem is that I want to limit the amount of frames per second to 60.
I decided that I should try using the Thread class's sleep(long millis, int nanos) method.
It seemed like it would work... but to my dismay, it did not.
The milliseconds, for the most part, were correctly timed... but still not always. The nanoseconds even less so... but I knew that the nanoseconds would be less reliable-I decided to use microseconds. Using microseconds doesn't even work that well.
So I wondered if there was an even better way... maybe a more 'manual' approach to fixing my problem.
I would greatly appreciate any input/knowledge on the matter.

its quite simple. Windows has an API call that can set the timer precision (its all based on some interrupt interval - I forgot the precise details). This precision is system wide, so if one application does it it is immediately active for all other applications running at that time. Applications can only lower it, so if you set it to 1ms then some other application cannot force it to 5ms for example.
Now here comes JVM bug number two.
As said the interval differs per system - sometimes it is 10ms, sometimes it is 15ms. The JVM wrongfully assumes it is always 10ms however. Do a test: try to sleep for some time that is a multiple of 10 (without the long running thread hack active); you'll find that the precision still sucks. That is because in this specific case the JVM does NOT change the system wide timing precision. But if you sleep for any number of milliseconds that is not a multiple of 10 it will actually temporarily set the precision to 1ms.
So the rule is: as long as one thread goes to sleep the precision is set to 1ms. When the last sleeping thread wakes up, it is reset to what it was. Then it also doesn't matter for what amount of time you make your real thread sleep as the long sleeping thread will not be sleeping for an amount that is a multiple of 10, thus forcing the precision to 1ms.
Now say that you don't do the long sleeping thread hack and you make your own thread sleep for say 9ms, switching to 1ms precision temporarily. This behavior makes it so that sampling the passed time (before and after sleeping) can be imprecise; you'll find that most of the time you'll get sampling that matches the number of milliseconds you slept and sometimes it jumps to 10/15ms depending on the granularity of your system. This is a concurrency problem; sometimes the precision is reset before you get a chance to sample the current time.
So to recap to give 100% accuracy with System.currentTimeInMillis(), you need to keep a thread sleeping at all time so the precision stays at 1ms.
And then finally we come to bug #3, which is a problem in Windows itself: rapidly changing the precision (which happens when you make a single thread sleep for short intervals) can screw with the system clock. I don't know if this problem still exists in later iterations of Windows, but it is again a reason to do the long sleeping thread hack. Because this is a known issue I still call this a bug in the JVM because of the way they implemented the precision timer activation, which can trigger the problem in Windows. The command line switch mentioned in the above bug report SHOULD have fixed that... but you know, facepalm bug #4.
But at the end of the day: even if at least 4 bugs can be named regarding precise timing in Java under Windows, the root of all evil is still the way timing is implemented in Windows itself making life too difficult for the poor JVM devs. What were the MS devs thinking at the time?

Final Cut Pro X Image Sequence Export missing frames per second option?

I am using the trial version of Final Cut Pro X. I can export an image sequence but it will only allow me to do so at 30 frames per second -every single frame!
So a 10 min movie takes half an hour to export 20,000+ frames that no one on earth has time to look thru.
In my old Final Cut Express I was able to choose 1 or 2 frames per second, which was just right.
What am I missing?
Do I need to buy Quicktime Pro or Compressor to allow me to export image sequences without exporting every frame?
Why would Apple even have an image sequence export if it only allows you to export every frame, or it that only in the trial version?
Thank you

I found a free option for you, if you don't already have Compressor 4.
In FCPX create your movie. Then SHARE as a Master File.
Get MPEG Streamclip, which is a free app available here.
http://www.squared5.com/svideo/mpeg-streamclip-mac.html
Drag your Master File into MPEG Streamclip.
In MPEG Streamclip, select FILE/EXPORT TO OTHER FORMATS.
In FORMAT: choose IMAGE SEQUENCE
In OPTIONS, choose your frame rate.

Why does my iChat video only run at one frame per second?

When I connect to anyone on iChat my video runs at only about one frame per second. When others connect to me their video is much faster. This hasn't been a problem in the past - even with other Internet apps running when I'm using iChat. Could this be a problem with my ISP? Is there something I should do?

Hi Gary45,
In AIM 5.9 the PC can set the Video quality rate.
Start a chat.
The PC end clicks on the rear tab of the Video chat.
This brings their own preview to the front.
To the right there is anow a small iCon.
Click on this.
This brings up a slider.
Slide the slider to the Left.
If this is done to an iChat Buddy and they have the Connection Doctor open from the Video menu, they will see the Bit rate and Framerate go up. The consequence is that as the video Quality goes down the data that makes up the pic goes down allowing for better refresh rates and a smoother video.
Do you mean this only happens between you and him and not between him and his son ?
Or do you mean it happens between you and him and not his son and you ?
If it is happening between you and other people aslo check out this FAQ http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=278760
9:19 PM Tuesday; July 25, 2006

Video chats get only 1 frame per second on my friend's macbook.

Hi.
My friend has a macbook, and whenever she video chats anyone, the video will only change 1 frame per second after 10 seconds in the video chat. Like the first 10 seconds, she`ll get 30fps but then after 10 - 15 seconds, it'll go down to 1 fps. It's not just with me either, its with all people I know its not her connection because her video isn't blurry at all, its crystal clear, but theres just the 1 frame per second. Her photobooth works fine and all, however. IT's a brand new macbook, fresh from apple.

Tell us every single add-On for iChat and the computer as a whole you have please.
Spirited Away causes the App in Use's Icon to be displayed as your Buddy Pic.
Lotus Notes can cause the slow down you are seeing.
So Can not Updating iChatUSBCAm when you upgrade to Leopard.
There are others
like Folding@hoem
Seti Screen Saver
Bionic (Maybe spelt Bionix)
9:52 PM Sunday; February 24, 2008

Very Poor Frames Per Second on MSI 661FM2-LSR

Ok this new motherboard that i purchased has a onboard graphics SIS 661fx now my old motherboard the MSI ProSavageDDR P4M266A has also an onboard chip however it allowed me to play HL2 with 32mb of shared memory off my 512MB ram the graphics werent to good but i could play fine
Then i had a 5200fx which was a major improvement however when the old board blew that blew aswell
Now i have got this new board and tried playing half life 2 and it has 3-15 frames per second (which makes the game sluggish as heck) but on half life 1 it has 71+ frames per second
i know onboard isnt that good but it should at least let me play my games
My old motherboard link (that allowed me to play half life 2) >> http://msicomputer.co.uk/Products.aspx?product_id=703551&cat_id=77
My new motherboard link (wont allow me to play half life 2 to a decent standard) >> http://msicomputer.co.uk/Products.aspx?product_id=703553&cat_id=77
Can anyone please help
Thanks

One thing to keep in mind is MSI doesn't make the chipset that your board uses. That is done by SIS. If the performance is lower then what you expected then it can only be attributed to SIS.
The best thing for any gamer, especially one who wants to play Half-Life 2 is to get an AGP graphics card. The performance jump is huge. Then the higher the quality of the graphics card the higher the performance of the game. Then you can start getting the eye-candy that makes Half-Life 2 so worth playing. As far as not purchasing MSI, that is fine. None of us get a commision or any benefits from you purchasing MSI. I personally got a built by ATI 9800 Pro (which I absolutely love). One thing to keep in mind though is ATI doesn't have any better support than MSI and I have yet to find an ATI forum. Sure there are plenty of forums out there but none are ATI specific, which I really wish existed.
I think we all understand your frustrations as computer problems are what brought most of us here in the first place. Just remember, we have no way of knowing what is going on with the MSI Support department. All we do is try to help out users who have run into problems and don't want to go through the hassle of going through tech support. Don't see this as me flaming you. I am merely trying to open your eyes to the reason Danny did what he did. None of us like to see the products we support day in and out (free none the less), get bad mouthed by users who are having issues.
Good Luck
Jeremy

GT660 - my Frames Per Second on Gaming

So I got this MSi GT660 with this Intel Core i7-740QM
with NVIDIA Geforce GTX 285M 1 GB DDR3 , that 16" HD screen
RAM with 6 GB DDR III ....1.7ghz , 3.0ghz on turbo mode
Hi, I play Counter Strike Source, now I get around 12-16 frames per second when there is a lot of bots or gamers in one , whole lot of action going on (like 8 gamers shooting in one place). It gets the same results of FPS on my 17" 2006 HP model.
And I get around 40-70 frames per second when I'm roaming alone in a map.
and 140 frames per second when theres nothing going on.
I get this low FPS on a turbo mode. Even though Im using "GameBooster" which temporarily disables unnecessary services. ( http://www.iobit.com/gamebooster.html )
Im looking for ways to boost my FPS in my game. Please help, I bought my notebook from FrostyComputers. They're great but Im not satisfied.
If you can help me, that will be great. If I'm not providing much information for you to help me, please let me know. Thank you

Thanks guys
There is one time when I backed up my game ( Counter Strike Source ) and burned them into CD.
Thankfully I did because my laptop crashed when I messed up something and reboot the whole system like new again.
And my internet is slow, but I only play locally.
So I re-installed my game using my back up CD. Maybe this is the reason why it so slow in its FPS.
Also, I found this link ( http://windows7themes.net/speed-up-windows-7.html )
useful, I could get my notebook to run on Adjust to Performance mode. Plus it takes off the Aero Windows Explorer, I think.
I was also pondering on the idea about going back to Windows XP just for the gaming, but I like to keep updated to the newest updates.
I might delete my local game files and re-download Counter Strike Source sometime.
I think this back up CD caused my FPS go down than normal.
I appreciate your help. Thanks

It only plays back at 6 frames per second

I applied warp stabilizer, but it only plays back at 6 frames per second.
There seems no obvious remedy. Why is this a mystery?
Thanks anyone

You're talking Swahili while the rest of the AE users are talking Chinese. The result: lousy communication. It comes from not knowing AE very well at all. You don't yet know the arcane AE Lingo, so you can't even explain things in ways everyone understands. Confusion ensues.
Do EVERYONE -- including yourself -- a big favor. Go here:
Getting started with After Effects (CS4, CS5, CS5.5, CS6, & CC)

I need help on my frames per second

i got this new imac g5 intel and i play Unreal Tournament 2004 online and it only gets 16 Frames per second, but i also have another imac G5 without intel and it gets 70 frames per second. My new one has 256 graphics and my old one has 128mb. If you have any information plz help

Hello EvilOne and Welcome to Apple Discussions.
Just to add to the excellent advice you've already rxed and clarify the reason behind it:
Your iMacs either have a PowerPC G5 processor or an Intel Core Duo / Core 2 Duo.
UT2004 was written for the PowerPC family of processors (i.e. your old G5 iMac) and although Apple has built-in emulation (using Rosetta) into the new Intel iMacs; it's not as fast as using software designed natively for Intel processors.
You should look out for "Universal" versions of all the software you use for the best performance on the new Intel iMac.
You can find updates for your software at MacUpdate.
Merry Christmas
mrtotes

Trying to find a camcorder that records in 60 frames per second and will upload onto ipad2 through camera connector

Trying to find a camcorder that records in 60 frames per second and will upload onto ipad2 through camera connector

Old forum discussion, message now gone, but here's the summary
Matt with Grass Valley Canopus in their tech support department stated that the model 110 will suffice for most hobbyist. If a person has a lot of tapes that were played often the tape stretches and the magnetic coding diminishes. If your goal is to encode tapes in good shape buy the 110, if you will be encoding old tapes of poor quality buy the model 300
Both the 110 and 300 are two way devices so you may output back to tape... if you don't need that, look at the model 55
http://www.grassvalley.com/products/advc55 One Way Only to Computer
http://www.grassvalley.com/products/advc110 for good tapes, or
http://www.grassvalley.com/products/advc300 better with OLD tapes
Or
ADS Pyro http://www.adstechnologies.com

Can you edit 24 Frames Per Second ( 24p ) in iMovie 6?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for