Cannot post invoices against a business closed workorder

Hi,
We are facing be;ow issue
We cannot post invoices against a business closed workorder.
The process is as follows:
·       At the moment a service has been delivered we create a service entry sheet against the purchase order (Account assignment work order)
·       At the same time we complete the workorder (status TECO)
·       When the invoice arrives at Accounts Payable the want to post it against the PO
·       Previous step is not possible due to the fact that the workorder has been Business Completed by SAP (status CLSD)
This results in a lot of hassles for AP and our admin, they have to re-open WO's, post invoices and close workorders again.
Can you tell me what to do to get this resolved?
In my opinion Workorders should never get status CLSD as long as there are invoices to post against them
Thanks
Br,
Akkshaya

Hi,
You can see the the invoice posted or not from the document flow to the order.
Coming to business closure normaly it is year end or quarter end activity. Which you will not be performing every day. And this activity prefarably be performed by finanacial people. Sice all the cost postings most of them are closed by them. They will get fair enough idea which period invoice posting is done.
Then in between you have to run settlement also. Finally I can say it depends on business call who will do and when.
Regards,
N.Nagaraju

Similar Messages

Error while posting invoice against PO

Hi
While posting an invoice against PO #, it is giving error as Field Prof.Segmt is a required field for G/L account Company code XXXX XXXXXX(GL master #)
Message no. F5808.
Can anyone provide me the possible solution for this.
I would appreciate your kind response and reward points.
Regards
Madan

Hi Madan,
In transaction SPRO under
Financial Accounting -> General Ledger Accounting -> Business Transactions -> GL Account Posting -> Carry Out and Check Document Settings -> Define Field Status Variants
Choose your Field Status Variant and click on Field Status Group. Double click on Field Status Group. Go to General Data and make "Profitability Segment" as either "suppress" or "Opt Entry".
Regards,
Srilatha.

BAPI to post invoice against a Scheduling agreement

Hai,
Can someone guide me which BAPI to use to post a Invoice against a scheduling agreement.
Thanks,
Upender

Things which need to be taken care of:
You need scheduling lines for todayu2019s date or in the past
You need to release the JIT/FRC(ME84)
You need to print out the delivery schedule (ME9E)
Then it is possible to post the GR with MIGO.
Hope this helps!
Sofia

Post Invoice Against Scheduling Agreement

We have a situtation where an end user created a non-GR relevant, text based only line item on a scheduling agreement, however the IR flag is turned on. Knowing that scheduling agreements have to have a delivery schedule is it possible to post an invoice against a scheduling agreement line item that is text based only?

I agree. The only flag that is set at the line item level is the IR flag and no others on this scheduling agreement. The error message I'm getting in MIRO is:
1) No (suitable) item found for purchase order XXXXXXX
2) PO item XXXXXX XXXXX does not allow invoice receipt
I've checked everything I know to check (Confirmation control key...etc). We have several items on this scheduling agreement that are not showing in MIRO exactly like this one.

Using INVOIC01, IDOC posts invoices against POs that weren't sent to vendor

Does anyone have any suggestions on how to prevent the IDOC INVOIC01 invoices from posting against POs that were not originally sent to the vendor?? (BSART = INVO)
For example, vendor (1521) sends an electronic invoice file processed as an IDOC. Vendor 1521 includes an invoice against a PO that was sent to vendor 7549. Since the PO exists, the IDOC posts against it. I want to make this a hard error (a 51 status).
Please help,
Cindy

Hi Cindy,
If you are using a standard process code for this interface, you will not have this sort of problem as the combination of Vendor and PO number are validated before that is posted. If you are using a custom stuff then you need to check the table EKKO by passing the vendor number and PO number as input to that, if that combination exists go ahead otherwise throw the idoc into 51 status.
Thanks,
Mahesh.

User Exit for Enter / post invoice against the order without goods receipt

Hi,
My requirement is to enter or post the invoice against the Purchase order without goods receipt.
Need to an User Exit for this.
Thanks in Advance!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

User exits available are:
V02V0001 Sales area determination for stock transport order
V02V0002 User exit for storage location determination
V02V0003 User exit for gate + matl staging area determination (headr)
V02V0004 User Exit for Staging Area Determination (Item)
V50PSTAT Delivery: Item Status Calculation
V50Q0001 Delivery Monitor: User Exits for Filling Display Fields
V50R0001 Collective processing for delivery creation
V50R0002 Collective processing for delivery creation
V50R0004 Calculation of Stock for POs for Shipping Due Date List
V50S0001 User Exits for Delivery Processing
V53C0001 Rough workload calculation in time per item
V53C0002 W&S: RWE enhancement - shipping material type/time slot
V53W0001 User exits for creating picking waves
VMDE0001 Shipping Interface: Error Handling - Inbound IDoc
VMDE0002 Shipping Interface: Message PICKSD (Picking, Outbound)
VMDE0003 Shipping Interface: Message SDPICK (Picking, Inbound)
VMDE0004 Shipping Interface: Message SDPACK (Packing, Inbound)
user exit when PGI is done
Reward if useful.

Cannot post invoice for framework order

Dear all,
Maybe this question is too simple... I created a framework order worth 6000 euros. But in MIRO i just want to post an invoice worth 100 euros. I use the framework order as reference PO. And input 100 euros in the amount field. But the balance is 100 euro. I cannot post it. Anybody knows the solution?
Thank, Jerome

Hi Jerome
Yes of course, for FO orders the process is normally very straightforward.
You assign your PO items to a G/L account a enter the value limit.
Then you can do directly MIRO.
Your problem is that your are not using a valid account assignment ( U ). Try as a test e.g. using 'K' ( cost center ; G/L should be determined automatically if setup correctly ) or 'X' and enter the cost G/L account directly.
Then your MIRO will work,
regards
Dirk

Cannot post invoice in MIRO

Hi All,
When posting and invoice in MIRO, I get the following error message:
Maintain the acct key and accruals/provisions in the calculation schema. I have checked these in m/08 and saw that they are maintained.
Another user can do the posting. Is there a problem with authorisations/profiles of user?
Can anyone help?
Thanks,
Malini

Hi
You will not be allowed to to create the PO if you have defined the accruals but forgot to assign the key in the calculation schema. IF this is done already , then during MIGO it will not post if you have not assigned the G/L accounts in OBYC for the accrual key.
I guess you have crossed both the stages. Since your user is getting the error during MIRO while one more user is not getting any error for the same, please use SU53 for the user getting the error, you will notice the missing objects in red colour and forward this to Basis consul. to clear it.
Regards

Making Business Place and Section Code compulsory entry in Posting Invoice

Hi
How do we make Business Place and Section Code Compulsory while posting Invoices for a vendor
Regards
Sanil Bhandari

Dear Sir,
Could you send the document to me as well? I ll be very much thankful to you.
My email id is [email protected]
Thanks again,
Gov

Cannot post a parked invoice import scenario

Dear All,
Cannot post a invoice which is parked. It gives an error message:
Quantity invoiced greater than goods receipt quantity
Message no. M8081
please note that the scenario is import and gr based iv activated.
scenario import: i am trying to do the "consignment clearing" under planned delivery cost.
pl suggest

I have got the place where i found the abnormality. In the Po there were 4 condition types for freight and delivery and consignment charges. All were correctly invoiced other than one value in which the total value was 2500 for the consignment clearing in the condition tab of the PO while 2700 was flowing in to the miro from the PO. I think this was the source and moreover the Gr based IV tick was there so i was unable to change the value .
Pl confirm me if i am right.

Deferred tax: Post invoice and payment separately $1" Message no. DEFTAX020

while reversing a document thru FB08, it is giving the error message,
" Deferred tax: Post invoice and payment separately $1" Message no. DEFTAX020.
This is a stand alone invoice document , without any clearing document. What is to be done ?
Below is the snapshot of FB03:-
Document Number 2256162          Company Code    MLTD         Fiscal Year     2009
Document Date   24.05.2010       Posting Date    25.05.2010   Period          11
Reference       PYX/10-11/032    Cross-CC no.
Currency        INR              Texts exist
Itm PK BusA Acct no.   Description                    Tx     Amount in   INR
001 31 U106 503551     PYXIS SYSTEMS PVT.LTD.         DD             55,150.00-
002 40 COMM 5656       Membership & Subscri           DD             50,000.00
003 40       1371       Service Tax Availed            DD              5,000.00
004 40       1372       Ecess on ST Availed            DD                100.00
005 40       1373       S&H Ecess on ST Avai           DD                 50.00
Document Type   I2 VEMDOR INV-CORPORATE
Doc.Header Text PYXIS SYS.P.LTD.
Branch number         Number of Pages 0
Reference       PYX/10-11/032    Document Date   24.05.2010
                                 Posting Date    25.05.2010
Currency        INR              Posting Period 11 / 2009
Ref. Transactn BKPF Accounting document
Reference key   0002256162MLTD2009    Log.System MALCLNT999
Entered by      NITINRB          Parked by
Entry Date      25.05.2010       Time of Entry   13:05:08
TCode           FBR2
Changed on                       Last update
Ledger Grp                       Ledger
Ref.key(head) 1                       Ref.key 2

Hi,
Check whether OSS note 913805 (see below) offers a solution to your particular issue.
Kind regards, Robert
Note 913805 - Error FF891 or DEFTAX025 when posting FI-Documents Version: 5
Summary
Symptom
The posting of FI-documents cannot be executed due to one of the following error messages:
FF 890 "Vendor and customer items in document with deferred taxes"
FF 891 "G/L account item without tax code in document with deferred taxes"
FF 892 "Error writing to table DEFTAX_ITEM"
DEFTAX 025 (no specific text)
Also update terminations and other errors which are related to function group TAX4 may be the topic of this note.
Other terms
RFUMSV25; RFUMSV50; VAT; deferred tax; BTE; DEFTAX_ITEM; TAX4; SAPSQL_ARRAY_INSERT_DUPREC; FI_POST_DEFTAX_ITEM; FF891; FF890; FF892; FF804; 00 671; FF099; DEFTAX020; DEFTAX021; DEFTAX022; DEFTAX023; DEFTAX025; DEFTAX012; DEFTAX_MX027; DEFTAX_MX047; DEFTAX_MX039; DEFTAX; DEFTAX_MX;
Reason and Prerequisites
Accidentally some business transaction events (BTE) for the new solution for deferred tax were delivered in an active state in support packages of SAP releases 4.70 and ERP 2004. The solution is available in the SAP-Standard only from release ERP 2005. Also in ERP 2005 the new deferred tax can cause problems in countries for which the solution is not released.
These BTEs perform strict tests for documents containing tax codes for deferred tax.
Solution
If you are using the old deferred tax, i.e. you use report RFUMSV25 to create transfer postings, you can safely deactivate these BTEs.
Remove the following BTEs:
00001025 DI-TAX CREATE_DEFTAX_ITEM
00001030 DI-TAX SET_DEFTAX_ITEM
00001040 DI-TAX CREATE_DEFTAX_ITEM_REVERS
00001050 DI-TAX CREATE_DEFTAX_ITEM_MR1M
In ERP 2005 (ECC 600) the application key is 'FI-TAX' instead of the above mentioned 'DI-TAX'.
To do this start transaction FIBF
-> Settings
-> P/S Modules
    ...of an SAP Application
Mark the entries from the list above and delete them.
This deactivates the functionality of 'new deferred tax' for all company codes in all clients on the system. This means that no data is written to table deftax_item at posting time. Report RFUMSV50 can still be started, but it will not process new documents any more.
If in ERP 2005 problems arise in one country but the new deferred tax is used in another country you must not deactivate the BTEs completely. In this case it is possible to restrict the BTEs to be active only in certain countries using the column 'country' in transaction FIBF.
Header Data
Release Status: Released for Customer
Released on: 16.01.2008 20:12:15
Master Language: English
Priority: Correction with medium priority
Category: Program error
Primary Component: FI-GL-GL-F Value Added Tax (VAT)
Affected Releases
Software Component     Release     From Release   ToRelease     And subsequent
SAP_APPL                     46C            46C                   46C
SAP_APPL                     470            470                    470
SAP_APPL                     500            500                    500
SAP_APPL                     600            600                    600
SAP_APPL                     602            602                    602
SAP_APPL                     603            603                    603
SAP_APPL                     604            604                    604
Related Notes
771319 - RFUMSV50: Documentation
Edited by: Robert North on May 26, 2010 11:49 AM
Edited by: Robert North on May 26, 2010 11:50 AM

Post Invoice allowed after CLSD

Dear Expert,
Recently we found that even after a WBS was set as closed(CLSD), user could still post invoice for a PO(MIRO) which reference this WBS. As to my previous understanding, this should not be allowed.
I have checked system status(Tcode: BS23) and for the system status CLSD: transaction RMRP(Incoming invoice) was set as "forbidden" .
Could any one explain why this happen, and how to control it ?
Thanks and Best Regards,
aTom

Hi Virendra:
Thanks for your kindly response.
Could you please explain what kind of "discrepancy" is possible to exist?
And as to your opinion, does it mean that if I have a PO(assigned to a WBS) which already finished GR, then posting a invoice against the PO should not be controlled by the system status of WBS?
Regards,
Tom

Reverse invoice against archived PO

Hi,
Business need to reverse invoice against one archived PO. I understand that it could not possible.
Can we issue credit memo agt this archived PO ?
Please advise.
Best Regards,
Raj

Once the document is archived, it cannot be done.
You cannot issue a credit memo.

Direct Posting to Contracts and Business roles in SRM

Hi guys,
We have SRM 7 and ECC 6.0.
Please consider the following business scenario:
Invoice creation in SRM against ERP contract that has been previously replicated to SRM;
No PO or GR involved in this process;
Possibility to have one contract to vendor A, and the corresponding invoices for different vendors.
Considering this we thought about the following solution:
Activate Direct Posting to Contracts functionality in ERP;
Contract, supplier and materials / services replication to SRM, through PI;
Allow different partners in the contract, using partner role “Invoicing party” (RS), so that it would be possible to post an invoice to vendor B, with reference to a contract with vendor A.
Questions:
Reporting – as far as I know it’s only possible to run analyses for vendors, which in our case would be vendor A, assigned to the contract. However, we will need to have information about the invoices posted to the other business partners that are assigned to that contract. Do you have any idea if there is any standard approach for this?
Contract and business roles replication to SRM – does the contract and the assigned business roles could be replicated to SRM or is it required any specific customizing in SRM for this to be possible?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
AN

Hi,
For direct posting to G/L in MIRO, follow the path:
SPRO > Materials Management > Logistics Invoice Verification > Incoming Invoice > Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts > Here Activate "Dir.posting to G/L acct = active" and save.
MIRO - It will show additional Tab as "GL Account" along with "Reference"
For more check the links:
http://www.saptechies.com/transaction-mr1m-direct-posting-to-gl-account/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/17887583/MM-FI-Account-Determination
Regards,
Biju K

Unable to create excise invoice against the Material document

Hi experts,
Unable to create excise invoice against the Material document in J1IEX transaction.
Material document is generated through quality management which movement type is 105.
error message :
Material document cannot be processed
Message no. M7130
Thanks
SAP MM

Steps to do GR along with excise,
1.Capture excise invoice using J1IEX.
2. Refer excise invoice no. in MIGO(SAP not recommends to post excise invoice against 105 mvmt against blocked stock)
3. Post excise invoice using J1IEX

Cannot post invoices against a business closed workorder

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for