Change Total Demand KF in SNP by material

Hello All:
I have a requirement where the request is to have just forecast and dep. demand to be part of Total demand KF in SNP. Also this will not have any forecast consumption. The above request is material specific and we will still use the standard Total demand for other materials.
Appreciate your thoughts and time.
Sayeed

All:
Need your advice, will it be a good idea to have a custom field in product master to control the level of calculation by macro (stock balance). The proposal is to have fixed values in the custom field i.e. "0" for Total demand (no change- consider all types of demand which it currently has), "1" for considering only Forecast and dep. demand in Total demand, calling this custom filed in the macro to do the appropriate calculation.
Appreciate your thoughts. I am trying to avoid creating a new planning book at this time.
Thank you
Sayeed

Similar Messages

Total Demand not getting calculated in Plg book 9ASNP94 -DATA VEW SNP94(1)

1. I am using the std planning book      9ASNP94 AND DATA VEW SNP94(1)/
2. i have maintained all the below master data
     1. Location.
     2. Product.
     3. PPm
     4. IM for planned order
     5. IM for sales order
3. Now i have sent sales order as demnand for the Planning book
4. Sales order is getting displayed in the sales order row.
5. The macro for toltal demand is working fine in the macro test,
Issue
1. Total demand is not getting calculated, eventhough i have sales order qty of 1000 it is showing nothing in the total demand.
2. since total demand is zero my stock on hand is also zero.
3. I need to run location heuristic to genearate SNP planned order.
kindly let me know how to address this issue !
reg
dsk
Edited by: Dhandapani Satheeshkumar on Dec 10, 2009 5:17 PM

Hi ,
can you plz go to the standard planning books - data views macro book .
i.e open the macro workbench and then go to the macro workbook for SNP94(1) data view.
open the macro book
See in the default macro list that all three default macros( shown in the top right hand side ) are added and also all macros in the macro book are either green or yellow. if they are red then generate them again .
if three default macros are not in the defalut list then include them ..save and exit .
Now check in the planning book if it works ?
if not let me know ? which version r u working on ? is this the first time you are seeing data in the planning book?
Thanks
Debsankar Das

Change description of excise item tab Raw material to Input material

Hi,
We have upgraded R3 4.7 to ECC 6.0 now we required in MIGO transaction Excise Item tab Indicator for Material type we need to change the description of this as RAW MATERIAL to INPUT MATERIAL and Consumable to Capital Goods which is in R3 4.7
Please suggest me any config.
Thanks
Shital D

Hi,
The above material type showing in MIGO screen, as you already declared the material under which material category in J1ID & so then value flowing.
You can not change here & you have few options to declared the material under which material categories.
You can keep all raw material as raw material & Consumable as asset.
But if your business needed very much, Just have a discuss with ABAPer for your requirement.
Regards,
Biju K

Forecast horizon values are not being considered in Total demand row

Hello Experts,
We are in SCM 4.1 Version.
I have a question regarding Forecast horizon consderation in Planning book.
We have a weekly data view In our Planning book,and in that planning data view "Total demand" row is not calculating correctly for the products with Forecast horizon .
The entire Forecast is counted in Total demand without considering forecast horizon value for that Product.
But this is working fine for Daily data view.
I have also noticed that, Total demand values are calculating correcly in weekly view ( Forecast horizon value from the Product master is taken into account ) only when the Forecast horizon value crossing that week bucket.(i.e >7 days).
But usually we will have a Forecast horizon value of 3 days for all our products,.
What should we do to get the Total demand values correctly?
Thanks in advance..
SAPLOUIS.
Edited by: saplouis on Dec 5, 2010 6:42 AM

Check the macros on data view
Regards
Aban

Change of Valuation Class for the existing material

Hello,
I am facing the issue while trying to change the valuation class of the existing material.
The material type is 'NLAG' which is non stockable material. However, all the PO are account assigned to the G/L account & cost center. Hence there is no stock of the material exists to any plant/ SLOC.
There is no open PO/ schedule lines/ Production orders are exists for the material. Also there is no stock exists at any plant. Even then system is throwing the message as 'The valuation class cannot be changed' (Message no. M3 368).
After debugging could see that it fetch the PO that are logically closed (has GR, IR, vendor payment has been made).
We do not want to have the split valuation for that material.
The material is in existance for quite a long time, so could you please help me to change the valuation class?
Thanks in advance,
Samip Patil.

Hi Raju,
To resolve SAP error message M3 368 I would suggest that you refer to SAP note number 1967543. This note outlines the issue and a resolution to it:
Please have a look at the description of the error M3 368. This error may occur if one or more of the following already exist for the material:
1. Valuated stocks in the current period or in the previous period
2. Open purchase orders or delivery schedule lines
3. Production orders for which a goods movement has already taken place
Resolution:
If you have valuated stocks in the current period or in the previous period, you will get message "Stocks already exist.". You have to clear all the stocks both in current period and previous period. Please have a look at SAP Note 30656, it shows an example on how to clear the stocks in
previous period. You can use transaction MIGO to execute this step.
If you have open purchase orders or delivery schedule lines, you will get message "Purchase orders already exist.". You can find related purchase orders after you click 'Display Error' button. Please delete them in transaction ME22N.
If you have production orders for which a goods movement has already taken place, you will get message "Production orders already exist.". Please archive these production orders. You need to set deletion flag for these orders firstly and go to SARA, use archiving object PP_ORDER to archive
these orders.
Kind regards,
James

Impact of change of field Country of origin in material master

HI EXPERTS,
what is the impact of change of field Country of origin in material master(Foreign trade data ) on sales order ,delivery and invoice ?
also will it impact the existing document if we had changed the country of origin in material master?
Appreciate your early response!
Thanks
Manish gupta

hi
this is to inform you that
you are telling about FOREIGN TRADE & CUSTOMS.
it will be having impact on sales delvery and billing as well as sales document is optional and the
delivery document will be stopped with GTS error with LEGAL CONTROL ISSUE.
if you over comes that then you will be caught in billing
in billing document will be stopped with ERROR called FOREIGN TRADE DATA INCOMPLETE.
because it deals with FTC.
regards
balajia

Changes in Demand Forecast after its final release.

Hi
We are releasing final forecast of next month in the mid of previous month (e.g. on 15th Jan we will release final forecast of Feb ) to SNP. Then in Feb'09 can we make chhanges in Forecast because in Feb'09 the feild is grey out and also it is not fesible to change the forecast of current month. Or this should taken care in SNP.
Pls suggest.
Regards
Vikas

Hi Vikas,
Dave is right. If you have defined your periods in months (assuming start date as 1st of every month) and if you wish to change the forecast during the current period, then the purpose / meaning of forecast itself is defeated.
You may have another key figure say , "Manual Correction to FCST" and the changes entered in this window (which can be kept open - editable until month end of current period) can be absorbed by Safety stock. This safety stock can be brought from SNP and can be made to reflect in DP Plng book. Any adjustment made will create a demand. You may have to alter / write Macros accordingly.
Key Figures-- Oct-Nov-Dec-Jan-Feb-Mar-Apr-May-Jun-Jul-Aug-Sep-Oct-Nov-Dec
Sales----
Forecast -
800-550-950-750--
MCtoFCST--100-
Safety Stk--400-
Other Key Figs..............................xxx---
Other Key Figs..............................xxx---
Net Rlse to SNP.............................xxx...
In fact , in this process you can set a limit to which the change is permissible (say to the extent of safety stock or a % of safety stock) and raise alerts using Macros.
Rgds, TRR
T Raghu Raman

Late Demand Fulfillment with SNP Heuristics

Hello all,
It is well known that SNP Heuristics does a bucket level planning and demands in each bucket are treated independent of the future bucket demands while creating the receipt elements. The receipts are created within the bucket unless there are sufficient receipts available in the past buckets that can be used.
Now, my question is, if we can force Heuristics to have the receipts in future buckets consumed with current bucket demand and not have to create additional receipts within the current bucket during planning run.
In a nut shell, can we influence heuristics not to plan receipts if there are fixed receipts available in future buckets?
Please note that settings like fixed pegging, maximum lateness of receipt, and late demand fulfillment do not work for heuristics. I have tested extensively using all of these settings.
Is there a way we can influence it to look into the future and if there are receipts available in any future bucket, say 30 days or 4 buckets ahead, in a weekly planning situation, it should not plan receipts in the current bucket and consume the receipts of future.
If any one has done such a thing earlier and can provide pointers, that will be grateful.
One option that came through discussions is changing standard macros to influence the way receipts are seen by heuristics during bucketed planning. Has someone explored this option? Please revert.
Thanks and warm regards,
Chandra

Hi Dieter,
Please check if the plan order is tied to your SO (t.code /SAPAPO/CTMVIEWER or in the /SAPAPO/RRP3). Also check in CTM profile (tab Supplies) what is your settings in the supply control section (Build Up Safety Stock and Stock is available). They should be active.
In the Planning Strategy tab what is the scheduling direction and pegging type?
Also check the Planning Strategy (planning mode & delete mode).
Thanks, Marius

How To Block a User From Changing Total Field In AR Invoice

Hi all,
I would like to find out how to block a user from being able to change the total field at the bottom right hand side of the AR Invoice. Currently if a user creates an invoice and is still busy in that invoice they can adjust the total field which in turn will update the discount field as well.
Is this simply an authorization issue or am I going to have to do it in the transaction notification?
We are using SAP Business One PL 30 currently.

Hi
Please review by note again -This is by system design .
I don't know why you are so worried abt this because by setting up discount max ,if user cannot post the document ,that means it is not in the system ,no matter they change multiple times in the fields .
But I think your scenario is different ,
You are copying with certain discount from Delivery to AR invoice and i think you don't want user to change the discount field , then you can solve your issue by using approval or sp_notification
If you really want it to be greyed out ,I think you might have to go through by SDK or Boyum addon.
Thank you
Bishal

Changing MARA-ERNAM and MARA-AENAM during Material create

Hi All,
         We have a critical requirement to change the MARA-ERNAM and MARA-AENAM during the creation of the material.
          We are using the BAPI 'BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA' to create a material from an Inbound IDOC.When we execute the above BAPI, the material is created with sy-uname in MARA-ERNAM and MARA-AENAM field and our requirement is to update our desired usernames.
       Please provide your valuable suggestions.
Thanks and Regards,
Stephen

and why don't you execute that BAPI with another UserID? or schedule it as a job, attaching the userid of the special batch-user you have in your company to the job-step?

Mass Change Standard Price in Accounting view of material master

Hi anybody,
I am maintaining more than 5000 records material master . Each time change material prices using MR21, but I don't want go MR21. need to develope one abap program for change material standard prices using BAPI or normal ABAP Program. how do I develope?
please give me sample program for that.
Thanks
S.Muthu

Hello Mani
I have already checked all the open items.....
No sale order. No entry in table MSEG.
Only one PO without GR.....So that should not make any difference.
Br
Avinash

*How to change the Valuation Category & Price control in material master*

Hello SAP Gurus,
I have a requirement to change the valuation category from 'X' to ' ' in accounting view of material master.
-> I have cancelled all the open PO's & SO's for the material
-> I have ensured that there is no stock for the material in that valuation area.
But still I get an error message that batch already exists for the material. When I check entries in MCHB I find that there are previous entires in MCHB with zero stock.
I have gone through the SAP note 155874 which recomends the archiving the effected objects.
Please let me know is there any work around to change the valuation category from 'X' to ' ' & price control 'V' to 'S'. I also need to change from ' ' to 'X' for a few materials.
Thanks for your advise.
Best Regards,
Narayan.

Note 155874 cleary describes what has to be done to be able to change.
There is no workaround, and if you change anything in the tables directly, then this will cause inconsitencies, as described in this note as well.

Change Payment terms combo value when change Total Document

Hi:
I need to change the selected value of payment terms combo (Item 47) of the form(133). This combo is placed in the third pannel of a form. Always appear the message Valid Value Value do not exist
The code is :
Dim cItem As SAPbouiCOM.ComboBox
If pVal.FormType = "65300" Or pVal.FormType = "133" Then
'facturas deudores y facturas de anticipo de deudores
'cambiamos la forma de pago si llega a cierta cantidad
If pVal.ItemUID = "38" And (pVal.ColUID = "11" Or pVal.ColUID = "17") And pVal.EventType = BoEventTypes.et_VALIDATE And pVal.ItemChanged = True Then
      ' el evento es que cambie el total
      oForm = SBOApp.Forms.Item(FormUID)
      oItem = oForm.Items.Item("4").Specific
      StrCliente = oItem.Value
      oItem = oForm.Items.Item("29").Specific
      dblImporteTotal = CMonedaToNumber(oItem.Value)
      BuscarFormaPago(StrCliente, dblImporteTotal, StrFormaPago)
      cItem = oForm.Items.Item("47").Specific
   If cItem.Selected.Value <> StrFormaPago And StrFormaPago <> "" Then
       cItem.Select(StrFormaPago, SAPbouiCOM.BoSearchKey.psk_ByValue)
   End If
End If
End If
Protected Sub BuscarFormaPago(ByVal StrCliente As String, ByVal DblImporte As Double, ByRef StrFormaPago As String)
Dim StrDato As String
StrDato = CStr(FNDameValor("[@" & StrPrefijo & "_FPAGO]", "U_" & StrPrefijo & "_OCTG", "U_" & StrPrefijo & "_OCRD='" & StrCliente & "' and U_" & StrPrefijo & "_IMP<=" & FNComPunN(DblImporte) & " ORDER By U_" & StrPrefijo & "_IMP DESC", pCmp))
StrFormaPago = StrDato
End Sub
I´ve used BoSearchKey.psk_ByValue,but with psk_Index or psk_ByDescription .I have the same problem.
Thanks for all
Joaquin Gomez

Hi Joaquin,
Why don´t you use a formatted search instead of coding?
The formatted search should be executed when the total is changed. And the value should be what BuscarFormaPago returns.
Regards,
Ibai Peñ

Total Amount Spend (ekbe-dmbtr) on Material & Vendor

Hi,
In My first ITAB, I have a list of Material & It's related Vendor
Like,
Material      Vendor
MM1             ABC
MM2            ABC
MM2           XYZ
MM3            MNO
In my next ITAB I need to find Total Amount Spend for this Material on It's Vendors.
(From - MIGO i.e. table EKBE )
I try to do this with following code -
IF it_comb IS NOT INITIAL.
    LOOP AT it_comb INTO wa_comb.
   SELECT a~matnr c~lifnr SUM( b~menge ) SUM( b~dmbtr )
        INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF it_pssum
        FROM ekbe AS b INNER JOIN ekpo AS a ON a~ebeln = b~ebeln AND a~ebelp = b~ebelp
                                    INNER JOIN ekko AS c ON c~ebeln = a~ebeln
       WHERE a~matnr = wa_comb-matnr
        AND c~lifnr = wa_comb-lifnr
        AND b~bwart EQ '101'
        GROUP BY a~matnr c~lifnr.
      ENDSELECT.
     endloop.
     endif.
Here First ITAB is it_comb.
When I debugg - The Values are correct in IT_COMB and IT_PSSUM - matnr & lifnr but it's not fetching Values for IT_PSSUM - menge & dmbtr.

Thank You All.
@Medha & NabheetMadan
Yes, I know it's not a good practice. But in PO table I have more than 10 Lac Records.
And If I take Loop Inside the Loop it's taking Lots of Time (going it Time Out ), Also if I use FOR ALL ENTRIES IN - Because I need to take all Records and it's Total on MATNR & LIFNR.
@ Vinod
I try it with
SELECT a~matnr c~lifnr SUM( b~menge ) AS menge SUM( b~dmbtr ) AS dmbtr
it's working. Thanks.
Yeah.. I know it's not in proper Index, but I need to do - Because I want to Work On EKBE values On Each Material & Vendor Combination.

Condition value from previous PO changes total value of new PO

Dear gentlemen,
We have a surcharge condition, calculation type = B (Fixed amount), category = Delivery costs. When viewing header condition details in PO, there appears an unknown "condition base value" with no "rate unit" associated with it. This value is carried over to the next PO created, changing its total value, thus affecting inventory value. What is wrong with this condition? How can I not let the system carry over "condition value" from previous POs?
Regards,
Carlos Piana
La Universal
Guayaquil, Ecuador, South America

My aim is the difference between 56062 on 10.07.2012 00:00:00 and 52013 on 13.04.2012 and so on.
The final table should look like this:
DateId
Severity
PageCount
DeviceId
ErrorId DIFF
13.04.2012 00:00:00
1
52013
163
1              52013
10.07.2012 00:00:00
1
56062
163
1               4049
13.11.2012 00:00:00
4
63907
163
1                 ...
28.11.2012 00:00:00
4
64492
163
1
12.09.2012 00:00:00
4
61524
163
1
29.11.2012 00:00:00
4
64573
163
1
Why I am doing this is that I want to calculate an Printerindex. This is the Amount of Errors related to the volume of pages, printed.
The Formula in DAX is Measure:=(COUNT(FactErrors[ErrorId]))/(SUM(FactErrors[PagesCount])/10000)
So I get this PivotTable:
Zeilenbeschriftungen
CountDevices
SUM PageCount
CountErrors
PrinterIndex
MFP
523
90135296
1362
31,24906792
HP
125
30805190
241
5,529387202
Lexmark
369
53500358
856
27,39392853
Samsung
29
5829748
265
41,33069233
Samsung CLX-92x1 93x1 Series
22
5400624
246
38,36735967
Samsung SCX-8123 8128 Series
7
429124
19
4,482612183
You see, that if I can't SUM already summarized printed volume. Another way could be to aggregate the volume as MAX() but this is not working, either.
Zeilenbeschriftungen
CountDevices
MAX PageCount
CountErrors
PrinterIndex
MFP
523
435853
1362
0,151106177
HP
125
435853
241
0,07823357
Lexmark
369
312478
856
0,159998929
Samsung
29
64117
265
0,454565103
Samsung CLX-92x1 93x1 Series
22
64117
246
0,45550292
Samsung SCX-8123 8128 Series
7
42386
19
0,442762465
I hope you see my problem ...

Change Total Demand KF in SNP by material

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for