Changes in the request level

Dear Experts,
can you please tell me the reason for the below changes in the request level.
Step1)
Once I executed the Info package till 5 to 6 hours atleast one record will not update and the request will be in yellow .
Step 2)
Then suddenly the request will become red and atleast one record will not update and the message will be as:--
Diagnosis: No Errors found the current process has probably not yet finihed.
System responce : The ALE of Inbox is identical to the ALE outbox of the source sytem
or
The maximum wait time for thiis request has not been exeeded.
or
The background job has not yet finished in the source sytem.
Step 3)
Then after some time suddenly around 800 records will come and the request also wil become yellow and the message will be as same as above.
Thanks and Regards,
Suresh.

Hi Suresh,
Check the trend of the data load requests from this datasource.
There are few possibilities like :
1) If all the requests are taking this much time,then your extractor is taking time based on the logic written to extract data from the base tables.
2) If this perticular load request is taking time,then check the selections you have given in the infopackage to fetch the data
The reason for turning it to yellow,red and again yellow is :
The maximum wait time given for the IP is exceeded.When the job in source is running its yellow,if exceeded the time limit,it is red in BW but yellow in source.Once the records are fetched, system sets the technical status to yellow again and then in turn to green once job is source system is finished.
Hope this helps !!
Regards,
Yogita.

Similar Messages

OBIEE 11g - No fact table exists at the requested level of detail

My dimesion tables are snow-flake.
Table1 has Key, ProductName, ProductSize, Table2Key
Table2 has Key, ProductDepartment, Table3Key
Table3 has Key, ProductDivision
I have created 2 hierarchies (in same dimension Product). Note: ProductSize is in Table1.
ProductDivision > ProductDepartment > ProductName (shared level)
ProductSize > ProductName (shared level)
There are 2 fact tables
Fact1 is at ProductName level
Fact2 is at ProductDepartment level
When I create a request with columns as ProductSize and some measure; and filter it on ProductDepartment. The request fails with error "No fact table exists at the requested level of detail", but the request can ideally be answered using fact with ProductName level.
I have properly defined logical level keys in the hierarchies and logical level in the LTS (content tab)
Can anyone point me what I am doing wrong here?

Since both fact tables are at same granular level I would suggest to map each other (Signon_A maping Signon_B) in BMM layer logical fact @source.
Considering them as Fact and with fact extension.
BTW: Did you try by setting implicit fact at subject area properties?
Edited by: Srini VEERAVALLI on Feb 1, 2013 9:04 AM

[nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail:

Hi All,
I am using OBIEE 11.1.1.6.8.
I have below senario...My fact table contains 3 LTS(yearly, Monthly, Weekly) and TimeDim contains3 LTSs(yearly, Monthly, Weekly)
Fact-Weekly joins with (D1,D2,D3) & TimeDimWeekly
Fact-Monthly joins with (D1,D2,D3) & TimeDimMonthly
Fact-Yearly joins with (D1,D2,D3) & TimeDimYearly
I hv also set the Fact source content to appropriate level of TimeDIM and details level of other Dimensions.
when i build a report using only year_code or month_code_or week_code as filter the query is going to appropriate physical sources
ie. if i take week_code as filter then the query firing to FactWeek, TimeDimWeekly & other Dimensions
if i take Month_code as filter then the query firing to FactMonthk, TimeDimMonthly & other Dimensions
Problem is when I use dynamic filter its is giving [nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail: error.
My filter is something like this using presentation variable pvTime (filter is prompted)
case '@{pvTime}'
when 'Weekly' Then "Calendar"."Week - WYYYY"
when 'Monthly' Then "Calendar"."Month - MONYYYY"
when 'Yearly' Then "Calendar"."Year ID" end
Please help me if I missed any step
Thanks
Smita

Its a guess but try the below.. As you are using the CASE statement in your filter, use it in the below way.
Store the value that is prompted into a presentation Variable
YOUR WAY
case '@{pvTime}'
when 'Weekly' Then "Calendar"."Week - WYYYY"
when 'Monthly' Then "Calendar"."Month - MONYYYY"
when 'Yearly' Then "Calendar"."Year ID" end
SUGGESTED WAY
(case '@{pvTime}'='Weekly' and "Calendar"."Week - WYYYY" = '@{new PV}' THEN 1
when '@{pvTime}'='Monthly' and "Calendar"."Month - MONYYYY" = '@{new PV}' THEN 1
when '@{pvTime}'='Yearly' and "Calendar"."Year ID" = '@{new PV}' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) =1
This might correct the way your are using your CASE statement in Filters..

No fact table exists at the requested level of detail Error.

Hi Everybody,
Facing a issue on the using Fact less Fact tables.
Scenario:
========
Using two subject areas to develop a report.OBIEE 11g
Fact1 --> Compensation Plan Assignments Real Time
Fact2 --> Participant Detail Real Time"."Participant Details
On both facts we created dummy metrics on respective table id's and aggregated to ROWCOUNT.
As i said in earlier we are using the above 2 subject areas to develop reports.
Logical SQL:
===========
SELECT
0 s_0, "Incentive Compensation - Compensation Plan Assignments Real Time"."Role"."Role Name" s_1,
"Incentive Compensation - Participant Detail Real Time"."Participant Details"."Cost Center" s_2,
"Incentive Compensation - Participant Detail Real Time"."Participant Details"."Country Code" s_3,
"Incentive Compensation - Participant Detail Real Time"."Participant"."Participant First Name" s_4,
"Incentive Compensation - Participant Detail Real Time"."Participant"."Participant Last Name" s_5,
"Incentive Compensation - Participant Detail Real Time"."Participant"."Party Number" s_6
FROM "Incentive Compensation - Earnings Real Time" FETCH FIRST 65001 ROWS ONLY
Error Message:
==============
Expression 'RowCount:[DAggr(Fact - Compensation Plan Assignment.RowCount by [ Dim - Participant Details.Cost Center, Dim - Compensation Role.Role Name, Dim - Participant.Participant Name] )]' converted to NULL because [nQSError: 14020] None of the fact tables are compatible with the query request RowCount:[DAggr(Fact - Compensation Plan Assignment.RowCount by [ Dim - Participant Details.Cost Center, Dim - Compensation Role.Role Name, Dim - Participant.Participant Name] )]..
[2013-10-21T12:18:45.000-05:00] [OracleBIServerComponent] [TRACE:2] [USER-34] [] [ecid: 004uJx90aHO9lZ73VJJNB80007eh000gl_,0:2:1:9:5] [tid: 457c2940] [requestid: f2e001b] [sessionid: f2e0000] [username: [email protected]] -------------------- Query Status: [nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail:
Please share some ideas on this or any guidelines will be very much helpfull.

Govardhan,
Did u configured any Dimension Hierarchy please set the levels in that particular Fact LTS.
For more info,check the below thread
https://forums.oracle.com/thread/2134934
Thanks,

No fact table exists at the requested level of detail

We have two fact tables F1,F2 and D1, D2, D3, D4, D5 dimensions.
They are connected line this.
F1 to D1, D2, D3 and self dimension D_of_F1
F2 to D2, D3 and self dimension D_of_F2
Means D2 and D3 are common dimensions between two facts.
D_of_F1
         |
         |
D1--F1--D2
         |      |
         |      |
        D3   |
        |       |
        |       |
        |-F2-|
        |
        |
        |
   D_of_F2
Hierarchies
H1 for D1
H2 for D2
H3 for D3
H_of_F1 for D_of_F1
H_of_F2 for D_of_F2
and pinned LTS of F1 --> H1 detail, H2 Detail,H3 Detail, H_of_F1 Detail
and pinned LTS of F2 --> H2 Detail,H3 Detail, H_of_F2 Detail
We are selecting these columns
D1.C1, D1.C2, D2.C1, D2.C2,D3.C1 and report works perfactly.
But when I add D_of_F2.C1 then report gives this error
Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 43119] Query Failed: [nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail
Please help me to solve this error....
I m new in OBIEE concepts so not able to trubleshoot...
Thank you.

i'm try to do an analysis between two tables (that have a relatinship), we had inclued first the FACTURA.FACTURA_COD, then columns from COBRANCAS and it work's. When we inclued the FACTURA.COMISSIONISTA_ID it return the fowlling error :check the level set in content tab in fact table.it can happen that FACTURA.COMISSIONISTA_ID is at a lower level than specified in fact table.
Regards,
Sandeep

No Fact Table Exists at the request level of Detail

Hi,
I'm new to BI.can anybody come across more than one fact table in BMM layer,currently i working with AP module,i am getting the error Error NO:14025 No Fact Table Exists at the request level of Detail.
Even i check with content tab where i have given detail level for confirming tables and total for non-confirming tables.
can any one have document related more than fact table in BMM layer, any body give me the right solution.
Thanks in advance !

thanks for your response,i did for the selected measures also. in Account payable model i have two fact.
F1 with dimension D1,D2,D3,D4
F2 with Dimension D5,D6,D7,D8
when i'm trying to generate reports F1 with D1,D2,D3,D4 i am getting the output,but with the non-conforming table D5,D6,D7 i am getting the error. can you give some document to work more than 1 fact table.

No fact table at the requested level error.

I have one dimension
Account
Two fact tables
Threshold and Transaction
These tables are joined to the Account Dim using Account Number.
Now when I create an analysis using Account Numbers from all three tables, it says no fact table at the requested level. If I include any other fact from both the fact tables, it populates null. It works right when I create an analysis from one dimension and either of the fact tables.
Why do we get this error and how else should it be modeled.
Edited by: 979130 on Dec 29, 2012 12:52 AM

I'm not sure about your data.. I give couple of options try them out any of one should work.
Assuming both facts are at same granular: You need to create Logical Fact table in BMM add first fact as source then, open properties wizard and add other fact table.
Assuming both facts are at Different or Same granular: You need to create Logical Fact table in BMM add first fact and then add 2nd fact as 2nd logical table source and set the content tab for both facts
Using any of the option you'll be going for metrics and use them in report.
In general: You need to let BI server let know how data is spread across tables so that BI Server can respond as you expected.
Hope this helps, Appreciate if you mark as correct/helpful
Edited by: Srini VEERAVALLI on Dec 29, 2012 12:58 PM

No fact table exists at the requested level

Hi,
I have a 3 dimension tables and D_CANDIDATE, D_QUALIFICATION, D_SERIES. D_CANDIDATE is linked with D_QUALIFICATION and D_SERIES. If i create a analysis with all the 3 dimensions i am getting this error. no fact table exists at the requested level. When i remove D_SERIES from the analysis it is fine. What i might have done wrong. Can anyone help me out please.
Regards,
Natesh

So I'm assuming your joins are like
D_CANDIDATE--> D_QUALIFICATION
D_CANDIDATE--> D_SERIES
Then treat D_CANDIDATE as logical fact in BMM and use reports, it is nice to have default hierarchies for D_QUALIFICATION and D_SERIES. in this case D_QUALIFICATION and D_SERIES are logical dimension tables in BMM
Edited by: Srini VEERAVALLI on Apr 4, 2013 8:05 AM

No fact table exists at the requested level of detai error

Hi Gurus,
Gud Evening,
There is a report with 10 columns and its coming fine when ever we are adding new column some date column (Start Date) it is showing the below error
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail:
Can any give some suggestions..
Regards

Hi,
You have to go to the fact LTS and set granularity for each dimension associated with it. You might be bringing a column from a dimension in your report, for which you didn't set up granularity in the facts LTS.
Thanks
Venkat
OBIEEDeveloper

OBI Joining two lookup tables. [nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail

Hello,
I basically have only fact tables that I need for my analysis. No dimensions, no hierarchies.
When add two tables in OBI Answers to start the analysis I see this error:
[nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail
I have them defined as lookup tables. How can I join lookup tables?
In order to pre-filter them using the user_name session variable.

Hi Nagireddy.
As described:
open your rpd. go to "manage" -> Variable Manager / New / Session / Variable. so to create a new session variable in the .rpd.
then you create a variable NO_FORCE_TO_DETAIL_BIN and se the default to 1.
BUT....this did actually not do the trick
I have created a logical table that is a table made up of the two that I just want to join and as soon as I create a bi answers report that contain columns from those two tables I see the error 14025.

How can I make a permanent change in the zoom level?

I want to know how I can make a permanent change is the zoom level? I dont want to constantly have to change it from the default value of 100% every time I go to a different page. Thanks.

Hello,
You can also use the [https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/2592/ NoSquint] add-on to change the default zoom level for all websites at once. After setting your global zoom level, you can fine-tune the zoom on individual sites and set the options so that NoSquint remembers per-site settings.
After installing NoSquint, go to the add-ons page to set the per-site settings:
* Tools (or [[Image: New Fx Menu]]) > Add-ons > Extensions
* Click the "Options" button by NoSquint

Agent cannot change to the requested state from current state

Hi all,
I have a new setup using uccx 8 and ccme 8.1 . Everything seems fine exept from randomly agents stuck to a not ready state. When trying to go to a ready state we get the following error "cannot change to the requested state from your current state" . The only option is to log out the agent and then log back in.
Any ideas?

Hi there,
I did the downgrade but no good. After a long search i found what finally the problem is.
The lines are stuck when there is a trasfer from a non icd dn to an icd dn. Believe it or not this is not supported when the setup uses ccme
You cannot transfer a call from a common dn to a uccx extension.
All unsupported features are listed below
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_8_0/release/notes/uccx_802_rn.pdf
Thanks for your time.
Yannis

How to capture the product change on the item level in CRM GUI.

Dear All:
There is a line item in the sales order. Now I change the product of the line item. I want to capture the change in CRM GUI.
PS:
There is a reference thread, in which I know we can capture the change in WebUI with the component T115IT_SLSO.
Can the old product be captured after I changed the product in order item?
But I want to know how to capture the change in GUI. Anybody can help me? Thanks in advance.

Hi,
when you create an item in GUI tcode CRMD_ORDER, badi CRM_ORDERADM_I_BADI will be triggered.
Method CRM_ORDERADM_I_PRODUCT_DETERM will have the Header and item guid and newly entered product in parameter IV_ORDERED_PRODUCT.
Regards,
Arun

TFS Integration Platform Error while Syncing - Caught and converted, The request was aborted: The request was canceled

Hello,
We are doing a 2-way version control sync between TFS 2013 servers.
TFS A - Project A is getting synched with TFS B - Project A.
TFS A - Project A has got all the code and files, whereas TFS B - Project A is empty.
Previously we have synced TFS 2013 projects across servers with out any error or issues. Today we came across an issue (check log at end of post) and hope Microsoft can
provide some guidance on this. Following is the problem we are facing today:
We have configured the TFS Integration platform tool for VC - 2 way sync and started the migration. Current
status is that the discovery, analysis is complete and migration is half way when I started to get such errors
(check log at end of post) .
Note that the migration has not stopped...
After doing some research and googling I understand that the reason for this error is that by default if
an individual file transfer cannot complete 16MB in 5 minutes, the operation will fail. And the solution to this is to modify
chunk size in the file of "TfsMigrationShell.exe.config". I have few questions regarding this...
Question 1:Is
above understanding and solution correct? I also notice that this error appears for every huge file (approx >30MB), is there any timeout setting at the target server? Is this something to be changed at the Tool level config or the Target IIS level
config?
Question 2: Suppose
I do not change the config setting, then huge files are skipped due to this error. However, after the migration of the other files is finished, then, will the tool retry to sync the skipped (huge) files? Or has it skipped them forever?
Question 3:
Suppose I modify
chunk size in the file of "TfsMigrationShell.exe.config", then, which of the following do I need to do (give me the best solution among the 3 below)
a) Do I need
to restart the migration (by deleting and recreating the project on the 2nd TFS Server and re-starting migration)?
b) Do
I need to create a new configuration and restart migration?
c) Do I need to restart the sync service?
The concern here is that we have got 3 more jobs (TFS
Integration tool configurations) running parallelly that
is syncing Work Items & VC of other TFS projects and want to make sure that restarting the TFS Integration Job Service will not have any negative impact on the other jobs as well as no negative impact on the current migration job...
Microsoft, Please advice. Thanks!
Log:
[1/21/2015 10:55:39 AM] AsyncUploadFileState.Completed -- caught and converted:
[1/21/2015 10:55:39 AM] Microsoft.TeamFoundation.VersionControl.Client.VersionControlException: C:\TfsIPData\10\ications\MDM Folder\Binaries\v9.5\DMS Web Service Release 1.5.zip: The request was aborted: The request was canceled. ---> System.Net.WebException: The request was aborted: The request was canceled. ---> System.IO.IOException: Cannot close stream until all bytes are written.
[1/21/2015 10:55:39 AM] at System.Net.ConnectStream.CloseInternal(Boolean internalCall, Boolean aborting)
[1/21/2015 10:55:39 AM] --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
[1/21/2015 10:55:39 AM] at System.Net.ConnectStream.CloseInternal(Boolean internalCall, Boolean aborting)
[1/21/2015 10:55:39 AM] at System.Net.ConnectStream.System.Net.ICloseEx.CloseEx(CloseExState closeState)
[1/21/2015 10:55:39 AM] at System.Net.ConnectStream.Dispose(Boolean disposing)
[1/21/2015 10:55:39 AM] at System.IO.Stream.Close()
[1/21/2015 10:55:39 AM] at System.IO.Stream.Dispose()
[1/21/2015 10:55:39 AM] at Microsoft.TeamFoundation.VersionControl.Client.FileUploader.UploadChunk(FileStream fileContentStream, Int64 end)
[1/21/2015 10:55:39 AM] --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
[1/21/2015 10:55:39 AM] at Microsoft.TeamFoundation.VersionControl.Client.Workspace.EndUploadFile(IAsyncResult asyncResult, PendingChange& pendingChange, Byte[]& uploadedContentBaselineFileGuid, Int64& uncompressedLength)
[1/21/2015 10:55:39 AM] at Microsoft.TeamFoundation.VersionControl.Client.Workspace.AsyncUploadFileState.Completed(IAsyncResult asyncResult)

Hi Charles,
I have been doing in depth research and testing of this and here are my findings:
Replies to your points:
1) It failed with UploadChunkSize value change. Tried 1MB, 500KB, even 100KB. Fails with same error! Is there any other setting we can change for the timeouts at the target TFS server also?
2) The huge files are not skipped. The migration loops on the failed files and doesn't continue to process the next lot of files. So the migration is blocked on the huge files.
3) OK. Thanks.
Please see below the finding on when migration succeeds and when it fails:-
Scenario 1:
a) Where Migration fails:
TFS A is in India and TFS B is in UK. Both TFS are on different domain. Migration tool is installed on same machine as TFS A. There is a firewall that allows the access from TFS A machine to TFS B machine. The migration tool fails to work in this scenario
when it encounters a file size approx > 8MB. I tried setting the UploadChunkSize value to 100KB. Yet it failed!
b) Where Migration works:
However, if the files are approx less than 3MB then the migration works without any errors.
Scenario 2 where TFS migration tool works:
TFS A is in India and TFS B is also in India (located closeby). Both TFS are on different domain. Migration tool is installed on same machine as TFS A. There is no firewall in this case. No changes were made to UploadChunkSize value and files with size
of 10's and 100's of MBs got synced without any issue.
Questions
Question 1: Can we conclude now that there is some issue with the firewall or network in case of scenario 1? As mentioned above Scenario 1 works if file size is less then approx 3MB.
Question 2: Is there any timeout setting on the Target TFS server which can be set so that it waits for the file without timing out?
Thanks for any help...

Enable change logs for item level of Sales Document

Hi,
On transaction VA02, additional screen field (Booking Date) is added (& consequently 2 appends with date field in the tables VBAK & VBAP).
When this date is changed in the header, the corresponding dates are changed in the item level as well.
However, the change documents are created only for table VBAK (though item data is updated in VBAP also).
When the date is changed at the item level, the change logs are created for the corresponding field in table VBAP.
The data element has 'Change Document' checked.
How can I activate the change to be logged for the item level (VBAP), when the date is changed at header level (VBAK)?

Hi Nidhi,
Maybe set a breakpoint in include MV45AF0C_CHANGE_DOCUMENT_CREAT
Then check in UPDATE debug mode the value of upd_vbap and the contents of xvbap which are passed on to function VERKBELEG_WRITE_DOCUMENT .
This function creates the change documents based on the data changes.
I would have thought that since the date values are changed at item level as well when you only change it at the header, they should get a change document created automatically, since the dates must be in the XVBAP table (as their value is changed at the DB).
So I would compare the various internal tables for both scenarios (header change, item change) to determine their differences.
After this use one of the user-exits to populate the internal tables for the header scenario based on the values of the item scenario. I would feel this to be a last resort though, since something appears not to be working correctly (I think).
Hope this makes sense,
Robert

Changes in the request level

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for