Code Integrity Check Failure

I am getting the following error in Windows 8 (and 8.1) when a c++ module that I developed is loaded. I am not getting the error on Windows 7.
"Code integrity determined that the image hash of a file is not valid. The file could be corrupt due to unauthorized modification or the invalid hash could indicate a potential disk device error."
After lots of searching I came across this TechNet article:http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/255.forced-integrity-signing-of-portable-executable-pe-files.aspx#What_is_Force_Integrity_checking
I verified that I added the "/integritycheck" linker parameter and my signing command is using the "/ph" parameter.
Does anyone know how to resolve this issue?

Hi Paul,
Thanks for posting in MSDN forum.
I am trying to involve some others to help you on this issue. It would be better if you could tell us more about your C++ module. Is it a COM dll or resource dll something? x86 or x64?
I would suggeset try rebuild this C++ module in windows 8 to check if this issue persist, or something else happens?
Best regards,
Shu Hu
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Similar Messages

Which exception to be thrown when integrity check fails

hey guys just a scenario for ya.
During the developmen of an API for Global Platform,if an integrity check failure occurs reading a value should an exception be thrown, if not then wat procedure should be followed.
put some light on this

dude,the scenario is as mentioned...
an applet calls an api which inturn returns a value.This value is a critical value of th card.So in the memory this value will be stored along with its compliment.
In the api,first of all it has to be checked whether the value and it compliment when 'AND ed' gives zero,this is to ensure that memory is corrupted.So if this check fails in the API what shoukd be done.
Should and exception be thrown or an error status word be return to the terminl

Kerberos Authentication: "Integrity check on decrypted field failed"

Hi,
I have configured a portal (NW 7.0 SP13) for Kerberos Authentication. I have another portal with exactly the same configuration (same MS-ADS etc, just a different user) which is working fine. But this one is giving me the error "Integrity check on decrypted field failed" (and Kerberos Auth fails).
Any ideas?? I get the same error whether I use the keytab from the SPNEGO wizard, or the keytab from "ktpass -princ host/%HOST%@%DOMAIN% -pass %PASSWORD% -out keytab -mapUser %USER% +DesOnly /crypto DES-CBC-MD5 /ptype KRB5_NT_PRINCIPAL"
The only difference I can see between the ldifde outputs of the two users (the one that works and the one that doesn't) is the one that doesn't has an extra SPN "HTTP/" - would that cause this error??
Has anyone else had this error & what causes it?
Many thanks in advance.
Regards
Jane
Full error text:
JGSS_DBG_CTX Creating context, initiator = no, input cred = not null
JGSS_DBG_CRED getCred: only one cred, returning it
JGSS_DBG_CRED getName found name: host/[email protected], mech=1.2.840.113554.1.2.2
JGSS_DBG_CRED Krb5 name type = 0
JGSS_DBG_CTX Creating context, cred usage = 2
GSS Context created
JGSS_DBG_UNMARSH Real token len 1641
JGSS_DBG_UNMARSH Token oid 1.2.840.113554.1.2.2
JGSS_DBG_UNMARSH inner token len 1630
JGSS_DBG_PROV getFactory: index = 0 found factory
JGSS_DBG_PROV getMechs: Mechanism(s) supported by provider IBMJGSSProvider
JGSS_DBG_PROV 1.2.840.113554.1.2.2
JGSS_DBG_PROV getMechs: 1 unique mechanism(s) found
JGSS_DBG_PROV [0]: 1.2.840.113554.1.2.2
JGSS_DBG_CTX Default list of negotiable mechs:
1.2.840.113554.1.2.2
JGSS_DBG_CTX ticket enc type = des-cbc-md5
com.ibm.security.krb5.internal.KrbException, status code: 31
message: Integrity check on decrypted field failed
at com.ibm.security.krb5.internal.crypto.n.decrypt(n.java:31)
at com.ibm.security.krb5.internal.crypto.n.decrypt(n.java:15)
at com.ibm.security.krb5.internal.crypto.n.decrypt(n.java:32)
at com.ibm.security.krb5.EncryptedData.decrypt(EncryptedData.java:106)
at com.ibm.security.jgss.mech.krb5.k.a(k.java:248)
at com.ibm.security.jgss.mech.krb5.k.b(k.java:188)
at com.ibm.security.jgss.mech.krb5.k.acceptSecContext(k.java:533)
at com.ibm.security.jgss.GSSContextImpl.acceptSecContext(GSSContextImpl.java:155)
at com.ibm.security.jgss.GSSContextImpl.acceptSecContext(GSSContextImpl.java:153)
at com.sap.security.core.server.jaas.SPNegoLoginModule.doHandshake(SPNegoLoginModule.java:738)
at com.sap.security.core.server.jaas.SPNegoLoginModule.login(SPNegoLoginModule.java:362)
at com.sap.engine.services.security.login.LoginModuleLoggingWrapperImpl.login(LoginModuleLoggingWrapperImpl.java:185)
at com.sap.engine.services.security.login.ModulesProcessAction.run(ModulesProcessAction.java:70)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:242)
at com.sap.engine.services.security.login.FastLoginContext.login(FastLoginContext.java:181)
at com.sap.engine.system.SystemLoginModule.login(SystemLoginModule.java:90)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:85)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:58)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:60)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:391)
at javax.security.auth.login.LoginContext.invoke(LoginContext.java:699)
at javax.security.auth.login.LoginContext.access$000(LoginContext.java:151)
at javax.security.auth.login.LoginContext$4.run(LoginContext.java:634)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:242)
at javax.security.auth.login.LoginContext.invokeModule(LoginContext.java:631)
at javax.security.auth.login.LoginContext.login(LoginContext.java:557)
at com.sap.security.core.logon.imp.SAPJ2EEAuthenticator.getLoggedInUser(SAPJ2EEAuthenticator.java:146)
at com.sapportals.portal.prt.service.authenticationservice.AuthenticationService.getLoggedInUser(AuthenticationService.java:303)
at com.sapportals.portal.prt.connection.UMHandler.handleUM(UMHandler.java:96)
at com.sapportals.portal.prt.connection.ServletConnection.handleRequest(ServletConnection.java:186)
at com.sapportals.portal.prt.dispatcher.Dispatcher$doService.run(Dispatcher.java:524)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:242)
at com.sapportals.portal.prt.dispatcher.Dispatcher.service(Dispatcher.java:407)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.servlet.InvokerServlet.service(InvokerServlet.java:156)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.runtime.RequestDispatcherImpl.doWork(RequestDispatcherImpl.java:321)
at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.runtime.RequestDispatcherImpl.forward(RequestDispatcherImpl.java:377)
at com.sap.portal.navigation.Gateway.service(Gateway.java:126)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImpl.runServlet(HttpHandlerImpl.java:401)
at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImpl.handleRequest(HttpHandlerImpl.java:266)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.startServlet(RequestAnalizer.java:387)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.startServlet(RequestAnalizer.java:365)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.invokeWebContainer(RequestAnalizer.java:944)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.handle(RequestAnalizer.java:266)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Client.handle(Client.java:95)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Processor.request(Processor.java:175)
at com.sap.engine.core.service630.context.cluster.session.ApplicationSessionMessageListener.process(ApplicationSessionMessageListener.java:33)
at com.sap.engine.core.cluster.impl6.session.MessageRunner.run(MessageRunner.java:41)
at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.ActionObject.run(ActionObject.java:37)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:215)
at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.execute(SingleThread.java:100)
com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.run(SingleThread.java:170)
JGSS_DBG_CTX Error authenticating request. Reporting to client
Major code = 11, Minor code = 31
org.ietf.jgss.GSSException, major code: 11, minor code: 31
major string: General failure, unspecified at GSSAPI level
minor string: Kerberos error while decoding and verifying token: com.ibm.security.krb5.internal.KrbException, status code: 31
message: Integrity check on decrypted field failed

Hi Désirée,
Yes the service user has "Use DES encryption" set.
In the end, it was resolved by changing the password and running the SPNEGO wizard again to generate a new keytab with the new password.
Regards
Jane

HOWTO: Create a Boot Configuration That Has No Driver Signature Checks. Disable Driver Integrity Checks and Install a Custom Non-Signed Driver

Hello,
Recently, I had a task where I needed to install a custom non-signed driver onto my Windows 8 64-bit setup. As it is known, Windows has driver enforcement policies that, as a security measure, do not allow you to install non-signed drivers.
I did not want to alter my current boot configuration so I decided to create a separate boot entry that would have driver signing policies disabled. For some reason I did not find any good source that would contain a step-by-step instruction on completing
this task, so I decided that I'd better share my experience here.
Lastly, there are multiple ways how you could turn off driver enforcement policies, but I find the way to do this via boot manager.
Here's how you can do that.
1. Press WindowsKey and type 'cmd' (without quotes) to find Command prompt, then click Command prompt icon. If you have User Account Control turned on, hold Ctrl+Shift keys pressed when clicking the icon.
This will force Windows to ask you for elevation of command prompt. Elevation is necessary for editing Boot Configuration Database (BCD), the database used by Windows boot manager to store boot settings.
2. In the User Account Control window click Yes to confirm elevation of command shell.
3. At the command prompt type
bcdedit
to list your BCD entries.
This will give you an output like:
Windows Boot Manager
identifier {bootmgr}
device partition=\Device\HarddiskVolume2
path \EFI\Microsoft\Boot\bootmgfw.efi
description Windows Boot Manager
locale en-US
inherit {globalsettings}
integrityservices Enable
default {current}
resumeobject {a329b5cf-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
displayorder {a329b5d0-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
{a329b5cc-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
{a329b5ca-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
{a329b5c2-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
{current}
{a329b5d8-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
toolsdisplayorder {memdiag}
timeout 30
Windows Boot Loader
identifier {a329b5d0-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
device vhd=[D:]\win8prowmc01.vhdx
path \Windows\system32\winload.efi
description Windows 8
locale en-US
inherit {bootloadersettings}
recoverysequence {a329b5d1-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
recoveryenabled Yes
isolatedcontext Yes
allowedinmemorysettings 0x15000075
osdevice vhd=[D:]\win8prowmc01.vhdx
systemroot \Windows
resumeobject {a329b5cf-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
nx OptIn
bootmenupolicy Standard
The section that starts with Windows Boot Manager lists current settings for the boot menu. Here you find what boot entry is chosen by default, this is the one what you will boot into if you do not select any boot entry in the
boot menu.
The following record
default {current}
indicates that by default my Windows boots into configuration which I use at the moment (currently booted Windows configuration).
To find out what exactly is current configuration, look into the list of boot entries, records that contain boot loader configuration and are titled as Windows Boot Loader in the bcdedit output.
For example, the entry shown above is one of my boot configurations. This is one of the boot entries listed on the boot manager screen when I start my PC and it looks like:
Windows Boot Loader
identifier {a329b5d0-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
device vhd=[D:]\win8prowmc01.vhdx
path \Windows\system32\winload.efi
description Windows 8
locale en-US
inherit {bootloadersettings}
recoverysequence {a329b5d1-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
recoveryenabled Yes
isolatedcontext Yes
allowedinmemorysettings 0x15000075
osdevice vhd=[D:]\win8prowmc01.vhdx
systemroot \Windows
resumeobject {a329b5cf-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
nx OptIn
bootmenupolicy Standard
This record has a unique GUID identifier that can be used to reference this boot entry, which is:
identifier {a329b5d0-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
If we look at the Windows Boot Manager settings, we'll see this entry is the first in order to be displayed in the boot menu on OS start (I marked the unique bits):
displayorder {a329b5d0-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
{a329b5cc-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
It references my VHD drive, a virtual hard drive where my Windwos 8 setup is residing:
device vhd=[D:]\win8prowmc01.vhdx
And it also specifies that the boot manager must use UEFI BIOS extension code to access my Windows boot partition:
path \EFI\Microsoft\Boot\bootmgfw.efi
3. Now locate the current boot entry.
Current boot entry contains boot settings used to boot into Windows configuration to which you are currently booted. It is referenced in the list of boot entries as a Windows Boot Loader record that has the {current} keyword inside and may
look like:
Windows Boot Loader
identifier {current}
device vhd=[D:]\win8rtm.vhdx
path \Windows\system32\winload.efi
description Windows 8 Enterprise RTM
locale en-US
inherit {bootloadersettings}
recoverysequence {a329b5c3-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
integrityservices Enable
recoveryenabled Yes
isolatedcontext Yes
allowedinmemorysettings 0x15000075
osdevice vhd=[D:]\win8rtm.vhdx
systemroot \Windows
resumeobject {a329b5c1-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
nx OptIn
bootmenupolicy Standard
hypervisorlaunchtype Auto
Because we are more than happy with current configuration and want to base our new boot configuration on these settings, we need to copy this boot entry ({current}) to a new boot entry.
This is done by running the following command:
C:\Windows\system32>bcdedit /copy {current} /d "No Driver Signature Check"
Parameter /d here indicates that the following sequence of characters specifies the display name for the new boot entry that we are creating. The name inside the double quotes will be displayed in the boot menu when you boot your Windows.
In other words, if you know restart your system, you'll see the new No Driver Signature Check in the boot menu.
When copied, the entry is automatically given a new GUID identifier, so upon running the command above, you'll see the following line returned (you'll have an other GUID since these are unique identifiers):
The entry was successfully copied to {a329b5d8-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}.
4. Make sure the entry has been successfully created.
Run the same bcdedit. (You may specify /enum or /v, or both /enum /v parameters at the prompt to get more detail about boot entries, but simple bcdedit is just enough to see the new entry):
C:\Windows\system32>bcdedit
Windows Boot Manager
identifier {bootmgr}
device partition=\Device\HarddiskVolume2
path \EFI\Microsoft\Boot\bootmgfw.efi
description Windows Boot Manager
locale en-US
inherit {globalsettings}
integrityservices Enable
default {current}
resumeobject {a329b5cf-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
displayorder {a329b5d0-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
{a329b5cc-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
{a329b5ca-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
{a329b5c2-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
{current}
{a329b5d8-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
toolsdisplayorder {memdiag}
timeout 30
Windows Boot Loader
identifier {current}
device vhd=[D:]\win8rtm.vhdx
path \Windows\system32\winload.efi
description Windows 8 Enterprise RTM
locale en-US
inherit {bootloadersettings}
recoverysequence {a329b5c3-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
integrityservices Enable
recoveryenabled Yes
isolatedcontext Yes
allowedinmemorysettings 0x15000075
osdevice vhd=[D:]\win8rtm.vhdx
systemroot \Windows
resumeobject {a329b5c1-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
nx OptIn
bootmenupolicy Standard
hypervisorlaunchtype Auto
Windows Boot Loader
identifier {a329b5d8-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
device vhd=[D:]\win8rtm.vhdx
path \Windows\system32\winload.efi
description No Driver Signature Check
locale en-US
inherit {bootloadersettings}
recoverysequence {a329b5c3-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
integrityservices Enable
recoveryenabled Yes
isolatedcontext Yes
allowedinmemorysettings 0x15000075
osdevice vhd=[D:]\win8rtm.vhdx
systemroot \Windows
resumeobject {a329b5c1-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
nx OptIn
bootmenupolicy Standard
hypervisorlaunchtype Auto
The entry has been created and given a unique a329b5d8-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240 ID. It now has exactly same boot settings as the boot entry we used to boot into current configuration of Windows.
5. Modify created No Driver Signature Check entry and specify that Windows must have driver integrity checks disabled when booted using this boot entry.
Any modifications to boot entries are made using /set parameter. To indicate that we modify a specific boot entry, we must specify the GUID for the No Driver Signature Check record, which is:
identifier {a329b5d8-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
In other words, to edit (add or change) an option for the boot entry, we need to use the following command syntax:
C:\Windows\system32>bcdedit /set GUID <boot_option> [<option_value>]
First, we must specify that we don't want integrity checks be made. This is done by adding the loadoptions option and setting it to DISABLE_INTEGRITY_CHECKS value:
C:\Windows\system32>bcdedit /set {a329b5d8-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240} loadopti
ons DISABLE_INTEGRITY_CHECKS
The operation completed successfully.
6. Verify that load option has been added.
Run the bcdedit command:
Windows Boot Loader
identifier {current}
device vhd=[D:]\win8rtm.vhdx
path \Windows\system32\winload.efi
description Windows 8 Enterprise RTM
locale en-US
inherit {bootloadersettings}
recoverysequence {a329b5c3-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
integrityservices Enable
recoveryenabled Yes
isolatedcontext Yes
allowedinmemorysettings 0x15000075
osdevice vhd=[D:]\win8rtm.vhdx
systemroot \Windows
resumeobject {a329b5c1-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
nx OptIn
bootmenupolicy Standard
hypervisorlaunchtype Auto
Windows Boot Loader
identifier {a329b5d8-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
device vhd=[D:]\win8rtm.vhdx
path \Windows\system32\winload.efi
description No Driver Signature Check
locale en-US
loadoptions DISABLE_INTEGRITY_CHECKS
inherit {bootloadersettings}
recoverysequence {a329b5c3-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
integrityservices Enable
recoveryenabled Yes
isolatedcontext Yes
allowedinmemorysettings 0x15000075
osdevice vhd=[D:]\win8rtm.vhdx
systemroot \Windows
resumeobject {a329b5c1-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
nx OptIn
bootmenupolicy Standard
hypervisorlaunchtype Auto
7. Add the option that turns on test signing mode and disables checks of driver signature.
Adding the testsigning option and setting it to ON does the trick for us:
C:\Windows\system32>bcdedit /set {a329b5d8-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240} TESTSIGNING ON
8. Now we have a boot entry that enables Windows not to do integrity checks and digital signature validation.
We check it by running bcdedit:
Windows Boot Loader
identifier {a329b5d8-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
device vhd=[D:]\win8rtm.vhdx
path \Windows\system32\winload.efi
description No Driver Signature Check
locale en-US
loadoptions DISABLE_INTEGRITY_CHECKS
inherit {bootloadersettings}
recoverysequence {a329b5c3-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
integrityservices Enable
recoveryenabled Yes
testsigning Yes
isolatedcontext Yes
allowedinmemorysettings 0x15000075
osdevice vhd=[D:]\win8rtm.vhdx
systemroot \Windows
resumeobject {a329b5c1-fb29-11e1-a74d-f2c962d62240}
nx OptIn
bootmenupolicy Standard
hypervisorlaunchtype Auto
9. Type 'exit' without quotes to exit from command prompt, and restart Windows.
Upon booting you will be present with a new boot option to start Windows in configuration that allows you to install custom non-signed drivers.
Hope this will help anybody to create their own custom boot configurations.
Well this is the world we live in And these are the hands we're given...

Hi,
Thank you for sharing the solutions & experience here. It will be very beneficial for other community members who have similar questions.
Regards,
Kelvin hsu
TechNet Community Support

Yoga 2 Kernel Security Check Failure

I have this Yoga 2 13' for almost two months. A few days after my purchase, the computer suddenly gave a blue screen and restarted. Then this BSODs became more frequent. The strange thing is that, I was in France for almost a month, and no BSODs happened. Now that I am in Turkey for a few days, the PC started to give out kernel security check failures.
Any suggestions for the resolution of the problem. Cause it's quite annoying to wait for the PC to crush before doing anything?
Here are the details for dump files:
computer name: BAHADIR
windows version: Windows 8.1 , 6.2, build: 9200
windows dir: C:\windows
Hardware: 20344, LENOVO, INVALID
CPU: GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4210U CPU @ 1.70GHz Intel586, level: 6
4 logical processors, active mask: 15
RAM: 4212088832 total
Crash Dump Analysis
Crash dump directory: C:\windows\Minidump
Crash dumps are enabled on your computer.
On Mon 8.12.2014 12:26:19 GMT your computer crashed
crash dump file: C:\windows\Minidump\120814-13828-01.dmp
This was probably caused by the following module: ntoskrnl.exe (nt+0x14F1A0)
Bugcheck code: 0x139 (0x2, 0xFFFFD0012EB1D5E0, 0xFFFFD0012EB1D538, 0x0)
Error: KERNEL_SECURITY_CHECK_FAILURE
file path: C:\windows\system32\ntoskrnl.exe
product: Microsoft® Windows® Operating System
company: Microsoft Corporation
description: NT Kernel & System
Bug check description: The kernel has detected the corruption of a critical data structure.
The crash took place in the Windows kernel. Possibly this problem is caused by another driver that cannot be identified at this time.
On Mon 8.12.2014 12:26:19 GMT your computer crashed
crash dump file: C:\windows\memory.dmp
This was probably caused by the following module: netwbw02.sys (Netwbw02+0xD945)
Bugcheck code: 0x139 (0x2, 0xFFFFD0012EB1D5E0, 0xFFFFD0012EB1D538, 0x0)
Error: KERNEL_SECURITY_CHECK_FAILURE
file path: C:\windows\system32\drivers\netwbw02.sys
product: Intel® Wireless WiFi Link Adapter
company: Intel Corporation
description: Intel® Wireless WiFi Link Driver
Bug check description: The kernel has detected the corruption of a critical data structure.
A third party driver was identified as the probable root cause of this system error. It is suggested you look for an update for the following driver: netwbw02.sys (Intel® Wireless WiFi Link Driver, Intel Corporation).
Google query: Intel Corporation KERNEL_SECURITY_CHECK_FAILURE
On Mon 8.12.2014 11:25:34 GMT your computer crashed
crash dump file: C:\windows\Minidump\120814-20953-01.dmp
This was probably caused by the following module: ntoskrnl.exe (nt+0x14F1A0)
Bugcheck code: 0x139 (0x2, 0xFFFFD001829955E0, 0xFFFFD00182995538, 0x0)
Error: KERNEL_SECURITY_CHECK_FAILURE
file path: C:\windows\system32\ntoskrnl.exe
product: Microsoft® Windows® Operating System
company: Microsoft Corporation
description: NT Kernel & System
Bug check description: The kernel has detected the corruption of a critical data structure.
The crash took place in the Windows kernel. Possibly this problem is caused by another driver that cannot be identified at this time.
On Mon 8.12.2014 10:22:55 GMT your computer crashed
crash dump file: C:\windows\Minidump\120814-7203-01.dmp
This was probably caused by the following module: ntoskrnl.exe (nt+0x14F1A0)
Bugcheck code: 0x139 (0x2, 0xFFFFD00174FC5180, 0xFFFFD00174FC50D8, 0x0)
Error: KERNEL_SECURITY_CHECK_FAILURE
file path: C:\windows\system32\ntoskrnl.exe
product: Microsoft® Windows® Operating System
company: Microsoft Corporation
description: NT Kernel & System
Bug check description: The kernel has detected the corruption of a critical data structure.
The crash took place in the Windows kernel. Possibly this problem is caused by another driver that cannot be identified at this time.
On Mon 8.12.2014 09:48:13 GMT your computer crashed
crash dump file: C:\windows\Minidump\120814-12515-01.dmp
This was probably caused by the following module: ntoskrnl.exe (nt+0x14F1A0)
Bugcheck code: 0x139 (0x2, 0xFFFFD000C3F70180, 0xFFFFD000C3F700D8, 0x0)
Error: KERNEL_SECURITY_CHECK_FAILURE
file path: C:\windows\system32\ntoskrnl.exe
product: Microsoft® Windows® Operating System
company: Microsoft Corporation
description: NT Kernel & System
Bug check description: The kernel has detected the corruption of a critical data structure.
The crash took place in the Windows kernel. Possibly this problem is caused by another driver that cannot be identified at this time.
On Mon 8.12.2014 08:26:09 GMT your computer crashed
crash dump file: C:\windows\Minidump\120814-12703-01.dmp
This was probably caused by the following module: ntoskrnl.exe (nt+0x14F1A0)
Bugcheck code: 0x139 (0x2, 0xFFFFD000210D55E0, 0xFFFFD000210D5538, 0x0)
Error: KERNEL_SECURITY_CHECK_FAILURE
file path: C:\windows\system32\ntoskrnl.exe
product: Microsoft® Windows® Operating System
company: Microsoft Corporation
description: NT Kernel & System
Bug check description: The kernel has detected the corruption of a critical data structure.
The crash took place in the Windows kernel. Possibly this problem is caused by another driver that cannot be identified at this time.
On Sat 6.12.2014 19:57:40 GMT your computer crashed
crash dump file: C:\windows\Minidump\120614-13812-01.dmp
This was probably caused by the following module: ntoskrnl.exe (nt+0x14F1A0)
Bugcheck code: 0x139 (0x2, 0xFFFFD00025F335E0, 0xFFFFD00025F33538, 0x0)
Error: KERNEL_SECURITY_CHECK_FAILURE
file path: C:\windows\system32\ntoskrnl.exe
product: Microsoft® Windows® Operating System
company: Microsoft Corporation
description: NT Kernel & System
Bug check description: The kernel has detected the corruption of a critical data structure.
The crash took place in the Windows kernel. Possibly this problem is caused by another driver that cannot be identified at this time.
On Sat 6.12.2014 17:03:33 GMT your computer crashed
crash dump file: C:\windows\Minidump\120614-21828-01.dmp
This was probably caused by the following module: ntoskrnl.exe (nt+0x14F1A0)
Bugcheck code: 0x139 (0x2, 0xFFFFD001CA954180, 0xFFFFD001CA9540D8, 0x0)
Error: KERNEL_SECURITY_CHECK_FAILURE
file path: C:\windows\system32\ntoskrnl.exe
product: Microsoft® Windows® Operating System
company: Microsoft Corporation
description: NT Kernel & System
Bug check description: The kernel has detected the corruption of a critical data structure.
The crash took place in the Windows kernel. Possibly this problem is caused by another driver that cannot be identified at this time.
On Sat 6.12.2014 16:58:13 GMT your computer crashed
crash dump file: C:\windows\Minidump\120614-17812-01.dmp
This was probably caused by the following module: ntoskrnl.exe (nt+0x14F1A0)
Bugcheck code: 0x139 (0x2, 0xFFFFD0002BFC5180, 0xFFFFD0002BFC50D8, 0x0)
Error: KERNEL_SECURITY_CHECK_FAILURE
file path: C:\windows\system32\ntoskrnl.exe
product: Microsoft® Windows® Operating System
company: Microsoft Corporation
description: NT Kernel & System
Bug check description: The kernel has detected the corruption of a critical data structure.
The crash took place in the Windows kernel. Possibly this problem is caused by another driver that cannot be identified at this time.
On Sat 6.12.2014 14:38:37 GMT your computer crashed
crash dump file: C:\windows\Minidump\120614-14515-01.dmp
This was probably caused by the following module: ntoskrnl.exe (nt+0x14F1A0)
Bugcheck code: 0x139 (0x2, 0xFFFFD00023BD05E0, 0xFFFFD00023BD0538, 0x0)
Error: KERNEL_SECURITY_CHECK_FAILURE
file path: C:\windows\system32\ntoskrnl.exe
product: Microsoft® Windows® Operating System
company: Microsoft Corporation
description: NT Kernel & System
Bug check description: The kernel has detected the corruption of a critical data structure.
The crash took place in the Windows kernel. Possibly this problem is caused by another driver that cannot be identified at this time.

I have this Yoga 2 13' for almost two months. A few days after my purchase, the computer suddenly gave a blue screen and restarted. Then this BSODs became more frequent. The strange thing is that, I was in France for almost a month, and no BSODs happened. Now that I am in Turkey for a few days, the PC started to give out kernel security check failures.
Any suggestions for the resolution of the problem. Cause it's quite annoying to wait for the PC to crush before doing anything?
Here are the details for dump files:
computer name: BAHADIR
windows version: Windows 8.1 , 6.2, build: 9200
windows dir: C:\windows
Hardware: 20344, LENOVO, INVALID
CPU: GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4210U CPU @ 1.70GHz Intel586, level: 6
4 logical processors, active mask: 15
RAM: 4212088832 total
Crash Dump Analysis
Crash dump directory: C:\windows\Minidump
Crash dumps are enabled on your computer.
On Mon 8.12.2014 12:26:19 GMT your computer crashed
crash dump file: C:\windows\Minidump\120814-13828-01.dmp
This was probably caused by the following module: ntoskrnl.exe (nt+0x14F1A0)
Bugcheck code: 0x139 (0x2, 0xFFFFD0012EB1D5E0, 0xFFFFD0012EB1D538, 0x0)
Error: KERNEL_SECURITY_CHECK_FAILURE
file path: C:\windows\system32\ntoskrnl.exe
product: Microsoft® Windows® Operating System
company: Microsoft Corporation
description: NT Kernel & System
Bug check description: The kernel has detected the corruption of a critical data structure.
The crash took place in the Windows kernel. Possibly this problem is caused by another driver that cannot be identified at this time.
On Mon 8.12.2014 12:26:19 GMT your computer crashed
crash dump file: C:\windows\memory.dmp
This was probably caused by the following module: netwbw02.sys (Netwbw02+0xD945)
Bugcheck code: 0x139 (0x2, 0xFFFFD0012EB1D5E0, 0xFFFFD0012EB1D538, 0x0)
Error: KERNEL_SECURITY_CHECK_FAILURE
file path: C:\windows\system32\drivers\netwbw02.sys
product: Intel® Wireless WiFi Link Adapter
company: Intel Corporation
description: Intel® Wireless WiFi Link Driver
Bug check description: The kernel has detected the corruption of a critical data structure.
A third party driver was identified as the probable root cause of this system error. It is suggested you look for an update for the following driver: netwbw02.sys (Intel® Wireless WiFi Link Driver, Intel Corporation).
Google query: Intel Corporation KERNEL_SECURITY_CHECK_FAILURE
On Mon 8.12.2014 11:25:34 GMT your computer crashed
crash dump file: C:\windows\Minidump\120814-20953-01.dmp
This was probably caused by the following module: ntoskrnl.exe (nt+0x14F1A0)
Bugcheck code: 0x139 (0x2, 0xFFFFD001829955E0, 0xFFFFD00182995538, 0x0)
Error: KERNEL_SECURITY_CHECK_FAILURE
file path: C:\windows\system32\ntoskrnl.exe
product: Microsoft® Windows® Operating System
company: Microsoft Corporation
description: NT Kernel & System
Bug check description: The kernel has detected the corruption of a critical data structure.
The crash took place in the Windows kernel. Possibly this problem is caused by another driver that cannot be identified at this time.
On Mon 8.12.2014 10:22:55 GMT your computer crashed
crash dump file: C:\windows\Minidump\120814-7203-01.dmp
This was probably caused by the following module: ntoskrnl.exe (nt+0x14F1A0)
Bugcheck code: 0x139 (0x2, 0xFFFFD00174FC5180, 0xFFFFD00174FC50D8, 0x0)
Error: KERNEL_SECURITY_CHECK_FAILURE
file path: C:\windows\system32\ntoskrnl.exe
product: Microsoft® Windows® Operating System
company: Microsoft Corporation
description: NT Kernel & System
Bug check description: The kernel has detected the corruption of a critical data structure.
The crash took place in the Windows kernel. Possibly this problem is caused by another driver that cannot be identified at this time.
On Mon 8.12.2014 09:48:13 GMT your computer crashed
crash dump file: C:\windows\Minidump\120814-12515-01.dmp
This was probably caused by the following module: ntoskrnl.exe (nt+0x14F1A0)
Bugcheck code: 0x139 (0x2, 0xFFFFD000C3F70180, 0xFFFFD000C3F700D8, 0x0)
Error: KERNEL_SECURITY_CHECK_FAILURE
file path: C:\windows\system32\ntoskrnl.exe
product: Microsoft® Windows® Operating System
company: Microsoft Corporation
description: NT Kernel & System
Bug check description: The kernel has detected the corruption of a critical data structure.
The crash took place in the Windows kernel. Possibly this problem is caused by another driver that cannot be identified at this time.
On Mon 8.12.2014 08:26:09 GMT your computer crashed
crash dump file: C:\windows\Minidump\120814-12703-01.dmp
This was probably caused by the following module: ntoskrnl.exe (nt+0x14F1A0)
Bugcheck code: 0x139 (0x2, 0xFFFFD000210D55E0, 0xFFFFD000210D5538, 0x0)
Error: KERNEL_SECURITY_CHECK_FAILURE
file path: C:\windows\system32\ntoskrnl.exe
product: Microsoft® Windows® Operating System
company: Microsoft Corporation
description: NT Kernel & System
Bug check description: The kernel has detected the corruption of a critical data structure.
The crash took place in the Windows kernel. Possibly this problem is caused by another driver that cannot be identified at this time.
On Sat 6.12.2014 19:57:40 GMT your computer crashed
crash dump file: C:\windows\Minidump\120614-13812-01.dmp
This was probably caused by the following module: ntoskrnl.exe (nt+0x14F1A0)
Bugcheck code: 0x139 (0x2, 0xFFFFD00025F335E0, 0xFFFFD00025F33538, 0x0)
Error: KERNEL_SECURITY_CHECK_FAILURE
file path: C:\windows\system32\ntoskrnl.exe
product: Microsoft® Windows® Operating System
company: Microsoft Corporation
description: NT Kernel & System
Bug check description: The kernel has detected the corruption of a critical data structure.
The crash took place in the Windows kernel. Possibly this problem is caused by another driver that cannot be identified at this time.
On Sat 6.12.2014 17:03:33 GMT your computer crashed
crash dump file: C:\windows\Minidump\120614-21828-01.dmp
This was probably caused by the following module: ntoskrnl.exe (nt+0x14F1A0)
Bugcheck code: 0x139 (0x2, 0xFFFFD001CA954180, 0xFFFFD001CA9540D8, 0x0)
Error: KERNEL_SECURITY_CHECK_FAILURE
file path: C:\windows\system32\ntoskrnl.exe
product: Microsoft® Windows® Operating System
company: Microsoft Corporation
description: NT Kernel & System
Bug check description: The kernel has detected the corruption of a critical data structure.
The crash took place in the Windows kernel. Possibly this problem is caused by another driver that cannot be identified at this time.
On Sat 6.12.2014 16:58:13 GMT your computer crashed
crash dump file: C:\windows\Minidump\120614-17812-01.dmp
This was probably caused by the following module: ntoskrnl.exe (nt+0x14F1A0)
Bugcheck code: 0x139 (0x2, 0xFFFFD0002BFC5180, 0xFFFFD0002BFC50D8, 0x0)
Error: KERNEL_SECURITY_CHECK_FAILURE
file path: C:\windows\system32\ntoskrnl.exe
product: Microsoft® Windows® Operating System
company: Microsoft Corporation
description: NT Kernel & System
Bug check description: The kernel has detected the corruption of a critical data structure.
The crash took place in the Windows kernel. Possibly this problem is caused by another driver that cannot be identified at this time.
On Sat 6.12.2014 14:38:37 GMT your computer crashed
crash dump file: C:\windows\Minidump\120614-14515-01.dmp
This was probably caused by the following module: ntoskrnl.exe (nt+0x14F1A0)
Bugcheck code: 0x139 (0x2, 0xFFFFD00023BD05E0, 0xFFFFD00023BD0538, 0x0)
Error: KERNEL_SECURITY_CHECK_FAILURE
file path: C:\windows\system32\ntoskrnl.exe
product: Microsoft® Windows® Operating System
company: Microsoft Corporation
description: NT Kernel & System
Bug check description: The kernel has detected the corruption of a critical data structure.
The crash took place in the Windows kernel. Possibly this problem is caused by another driver that cannot be identified at this time.

SSO using Kerberso receiving "Integrity check on decrypted field failed (31

I am trying to implement SSO for an application that is running on a WebLogic Server. I have flagged the AD Service user for DES encryption, added spn through setspn, created the keytab file, reset the password (to the same value), moved the keytab file, updated krb5.ini and krb5Login.conf accordingly, modified WebLogic startup command accordingly. When Users try to access the application, authentication fails, and I see Integrity check on decrypted field failed (31) error in the WebLogic logs. Any ideas ? I am attaching the related lines from the log below.
<Sep 29, 2008 9:46:50 AM MDT> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <000000> <Found Negotiate with SPNEGO token>
Debug is true storeKey true useTicketCache false useKeyTab true doNotPrompt false ticketCache is null KeyTab is devmax01.http.keytab2 refreshKrb5Config is false principal is HTTP/[email protected] tryFirstPass is false useFirstPass is false storePass is false clearPass is false
KeyTab: load() entry length: 60
KeyTabInputStream, readName(): DEV.DENVERWATER.ORG
KeyTabInputStream, readName(): HTTP
KeyTabInputStream, readName(): devmax01principal's key obtained from the keytab
principal is HTTP/[email protected]
EType: sun.security.krb5.internal.crypto.DesCbcMd5EType
KrbAsReq calling createMessage
KrbAsReq in createMessage
KrbAsReq etypes are: 3 1
KrbKdcReq send: kdc=dwdev01 UDP:88, timeout=30000, number of retries =3, #bytes=249
KDCCommunication: kdc=dwdev01 UDP:88, timeout=30000,Attempt =1, #bytes=249
KrbKdcReq send: #bytes read=1312
KrbKdcReq send: #bytes read=1312
EType: sun.security.krb5.internal.crypto.DesCbcMd5EType
KrbAsRep cons in KrbAsReq.getReply HTTP/devmax01Added server's keyKerberos Principal HTTP/[email protected] Version 8key EncryptionKey: keyType=3 keyBytes (hex dump)=
0000: 2F 02 76 AB 7F 8C B0 6E
[Krb5LoginModule] added Krb5Principal HTTP/[email protected] to Subject
Commit Succeeded
Found key for HTTP/[email protected]
Entered Krb5Context.acceptSecContext with state=STATE_NEW
EType: sun.security.krb5.internal.crypto.DesCbcMd5EType<Sep 29, 2008 9:46:50 AM MDT> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <000000> <GSS exception GSSException: Failure unspecified at GSS-API level (Mechanism level: Integrity check on decrypted field failed (31))
GSSException: Failure unspecified at GSS-API level (Mechanism level: Integrity check on decrypted field failed (31))

FYI The fix for this was to chang the value for -Djava.security.krb5.realm to be all upper case
Once that change was made authentication passed
Edited by: IDL on Jan 2, 2008 9:25 AM

Error occured in the integration checks(read log)

Hi,
I try to post planning of machinery hours in KP26, tht time i got this error, and data is not saved too. " error occured in the integration checks(read log)" kindly solve this problem asap.
Regards
PRINCE

Sir,
Where to maintain Nominal rate for this question KP26 ? give me a path or transaction code.
Regards
Prince

Kernell security check failure issue

Hi.
I installed a webcam with mic integrated (external device) to my lenovo T61 computer, running 8.1 windows. When trying to use the webcam, the kernel security check failure appears, crashes my computer and restarts it. What can I do?
Thanks

Hi,
Any update here?
For the error message about KERNEL_SECURITY_CHECK_FAILURE, here is an MSDN article for reference:
Bug Check 0x139 KERNEL_SECURITY_CHECK_FAILURE
This bug check indicates that the kernel has detected the corruption of a critical data structure.
For information about how to recover from this error, see
Resolving Blue Screen errors in Windows.
As ZigZag and Brandon Records mentioned, we need the dump file to offer a better suggestion.
Some more reference:
Use OneDrive (SkyDrive) to
upload collected files and post screen shot/picture. (Updated: 1/16/2012)
How to read the small memory dump file that is created by Windows if a crash occurs
Best regards
Michael Shao
TechNet Community Support

Do integrity checks by file comparison really work?

Hello,
I use a program (Beyond Compare) which has a Folder Compare module, with a function for doing a binary comparison between the files inside two folders. I use it to check the integrity of my backups, by comparing my main hard disk files, with the ones on
the backup hard disks. If two files get recognized as being different, then one of them should be corrupt (if they didn't get modified "normally").
My question is: will this method work to detect real file corruptions? Will it detect any kind of corruption, both copy corruptions, and "bit rot" corruptions? Will there be no problem regarding read cache? I mean: if the first file to compare gets read
from disk, and is kept in a read cache (by Windows or by the hard disk, or by something else), will the second file get read from the same cache (if Windows or the hard disk think they are identical files)? Do Windows and hard disks have some kind of procedure
to detect if a file to read from disk is already available in cache, even if it is in a different folder than the "original" one? Perhaps some kind of file-checksum-system which decides that the files are same? (And this system would not notice if the file
to compare is corrupt). If this would be true, then integrity checks by file comparison would not work, because in practice the same file would be read twice (first from disk, and then from cache), instead of reading both the two files to be compared from
disk.
I have already done tests by manually "corrupting" files (changing slightly the contents, while keeping size and timestamp the same), and it works (the files get recognized as different). But I'm not sure if it will work also with "real" corrupt files.
I'm interested mostly about Windows 8 Pro 64bit and NTFS (but would like to know also in general).
Thanks.

I also have Beyond Compare and have used it to check backup data.
Yes, Windows does RAM caching. If you have a comparison program read enough file data that you
can be sure the RAM cache is flushed, then you can be sure that reading the file data back and comparing it with the original data is a valid way to ensure you have uncorrupted backups.
Note that NTFS now does online recovery, so just the act of reading back the data can trigger processes inside the file system implementation that will recover the data if it should start to experience "bit rot" (weakening or failure of the
storage medium). But this is not strictly necessary as other operations, such as defragmentation etc., will occasionally access the disk data as well.
Some time back I wrote a small utility that calculates a CRC-32 on all the data from all the files in a set of folders. This is another way that re-reading all the data can be triggered, as well as producing a summary number that can be easily
compared to determine that all is well - though one doesn't need my software to do it... There are hash programs available that can accomplish the same things. Search for SHA-1 programs, but beware there can be malware associated with free programs
and download sites.
It's good that people think about data integrity. There's all too little of that nowadays.
-Noel
Detailed how-to in my eBooks:
Configure The Windows 7 "To Work" Options
Configure The Windows 8 "To Work" Options

Jaas & Integrity check on decrypted field failed

I'm trying to do Kerberos authentication using JAAS and the jdk 1.4.1_02 under Mandrake 9.1. The Kerberos server is installed on a Redhat 9 machine. I'm using the login module com.sun.security.auth.module.Krb5LoginModule and the TextCallbackHandler class. The login fails with the error "Exception: krb_error 31 Integrity check on decrypted field failed (31) Integrity check on decrypted field failed". I get the same error if I use the kinit utility bundled with the jdk. Conversely all seems ok when I use the kinit utility bundled with the kerberos client programs of my Mandrake 9.1 distribution.
Anyone could help me?
Michele

I encountered the same problem--"Integrity check on decrypted field failed (31)" when trying to authenticate against a KDC (v5) running RedHat 8.0 (JASS and JDK 1.4.1_02)--but I was able to use Kerberized telnet and login from remote/local machines to get authenticated with this RedHat KDC. There is no problem authenticating against a KDC running Win2k AD/Kerberos with the same code. I am using the com.sun.security.auth.module.Krb5LoginModule.
Can anyone help me to resolve this issure?

Offline Subordinate CA won't start due to revocation check failure

Greetings!
I'm building out a 3-tier PKI in my lab where both the root & first-level subordinate CA are offline. I am at the point where I have installed the CA certificate on the offline subordinate & I am attempting to start Certificate Services. THe
service start fails due to revocation check failure. This makes sense to me since the 2 locations in the CDP are ldap & http respectively; both requiring network connectivity.
What is the best practice for getting this to work? Is there a way to locally "inject" the Roo CA's CRL, or am I missing something else?

you need to install root CRL to a local certificate store:
certutil -addstore CA c:\filename.crl
Vadims Podāns, aka PowerShell CryptoGuy
My weblog: en-us.sysadmins.lv
PowerShell PKI Module: pspki.codeplex.com
PowerShell Cmdlet Help Editor pscmdlethelpeditor.codeplex.com
Check out new: SSL Certificate Verifier
Check out new:
PowerShell File Checksum Integrity Verifier tool.

Run-Time Check Failure #2 - Stack around the variable was corrupted.

I had checked on net as well as on social msdn site for this kind of error. Usually error is due to writing out of index. I tried to figure out same mistake in below mentioned code but I failed to do so. I am using Visual Studio 2010 for compilation
on Windows 7 (64 bit) machine. I am getting following error "Run-Time Check Failure #2 - Stack around the variable 'lcPacketPrefix' was corrupted."
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#define TRUE 1
#define FALSE 0
#define BYTE unsigned char
typedef struct {
int i;
double e;
long t;
char ar[45];
}Sample;
bool getMCXBuffPrefix(char * lpSource,char* Destination, int piSourceLen)
char lcPacketLen[10];
char lcPacketPrefix[5];
try
memset(lcPacketLen,'0',sizeof(lcPacketLen));
memset(lcPacketPrefix,'0',sizeof(lcPacketPrefix));
_itoa(piSourceLen,lcPacketLen,10);
strcpy_s(lcPacketPrefix+(sizeof(lcPacketPrefix)-strlen(lcPacketLen)),sizeof(lcPacketPrefix),lcPacketLen);
//To Prefix Length in send Packet
memcpy(Destination,lcPacketPrefix,5);
memcpy(Destination+5,(char*)lpSource,piSourceLen);
catch(...)
printf("In Catch: While Prefixing MCX Buffer.\n");
return FALSE;
return TRUE;
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
BYTE* lcCompData = (BYTE*) malloc (1024);
BYTE* gpcSendSource = (BYTE*) malloc (1024);
Sample sample_t;
memset((BYTE*)gpcSendSource,'0',1024);
memset(&sample_t, '\0', sizeof(Sample));
memcpy(gpcSendSource, &sample_t, sizeof(Sample));
bool lbPrefixed = getMCXBuffPrefix((char*)gpcSendSource,(char*)lcCompData,sizeof(Sample));
return 0;
Little guidance will be helpful.

I had checked on net as well as on social msdn site for this kind of error. Usually error is due to writing out of index.
As it is in your code.
strcpy_s(lcPacketPrefix+(sizeof(lcPacketPrefix)-strlen(lcPacketLen)),sizeof(lcPacketPrefix),lcPacketLen);
You're saying that the size of the buffer is greater than it is
because you're offsetting the start pointer.
If you'd more correctly written the code like this:
size_t offset = (sizeof(lcPacketPrefix) - strlen(lcPacketLen));
strcpy_s(lcPacketPrefix+offset,sizeof(lcPacketPrefix)-offset,lcPacketLen);
You'd have got a run-time error in the debug version of your code.
However that's not what you want. Try something like this instead:
size_t offset = (sizeof(lcPacketPrefix) - strlen(lcPacketLen));
strncpy(lcPacketPrefix + offset, lcPacketLen, strlen(lcPacketLen) );
But most importantly, understand what you'd done wrong and learn from
it.
Dave

Debugging: Run-Time Check Failure #2 - Stack around the variable 'LoggerThread' was corrupted.

I am getting:
Run-Time Check Failure #2 - Stack around the variable 'LoggerThread' was corrupted.
I have searched as much as I can for a description of how to diagnose, but I have not found anything. I don't know how to determine the specific address that is being corrupted. If I knew that, then I could of course set a breakpoint on the condition of that changing.
I have found many answers about other instances of this error, but nothing that descibes how to diagnose this problem. All other problems were simple enough that the problem could be determined by looking at the code. I have looked at my code extensively and I don't see a problem. One of the previous answers I have found is Error: Stack corruption around the variable 'tm' but the current version of the program uses only default alignment.
This particular problem is a symptom of a problem that has had various other symptoms, most of which would be more difficult to diagnose. Therefore the problem is probably more subtle than most. I initially encountered the problem in a DLL project, but I wrote a console program to use and test the relevant code. It is the console version that I am debugging.

Sam Hobbs wrote:
Holger Grund wrote:
Hey, these data breakpoints are really not that hard to use ;-)
Actually they are useless for me when I use my own system, which is only 350 MHz. On that system, even very simple programs run noticeably slow and any meaningful debugging is impossible. The problem I am encountering I am developing and debugging using a fast system, so the performance is not likely to be a probem, but that has been a problem for me in the past.
You probably haven't set the breakpoints in the correct way (again you should calculate the address yourself and leave the context empty so that the hardware debug breakpoint registers can be used).
Sam Hobbs wrote:
One of us does not understand. First, I must correct what I said before; the stack is used in reverse of what I was thinking. I knew that but I forgot. In other words, for each item local appearing in a function, the addresses decrease. The processor's stack pointer register is decreased for each item put into it, which makes sense, because then the processor knows there is a problem when the register gets to zero or less.
Yes, I certainly understand that the error message is referring to memory before and after LoggerThread.
There is an important difference between stack memory before a function's allocations and after.
So for example if we have:
Code Snippet
void Level3(int a) {
char Local[4];
std::cout << "In Level3 Local is at " << &Local << '\n';
void Level2(int a) {
char Local[4];
std::cout << "In Level2 Local is at " << &Local << '\n';
Level3(3);
void Level1(int a) {
char Local[4];
std::cout << "In Level1 Local is at " << &Local << '\n';
Level2(2);
int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
(void)argc, argv;
char Local[4]="321";
unsigned *pStack;
_asm {mov pStack, esp}
std::cout << "The stack is at " << pStack << '\n';
std::cout << "In main Local is at " << &Local << '\n';
Level1(1);
return 0;
Then the ouput I get is:
The stack is at 0012FF1C
In main Local is at 0012FF6C
In Level1 Local is at 0012FF0C
In Level2 Local is at 0012FEB0
In Level3 Local is at 0012FE54
Note that the addresses decrease. If I create a breakpoint using "{main,,} *(Local-256)" for 256 elements, then that breakpoint breaks constantly due to normal use of the stack. That makes debugging more difficult; are you aware of that problem?
Unsurprisingly the debugger will watch for modifications of 256 bytes if you tell it to do so. But I don't see why you would want to do it? It is obvious that this extends into callee stack space. There are only two bytes that you should be interested in: the one before the clobbered local and the one after. Of course, during its lifetime its allocated address will never change. And in debug stack frames its memory location is never shared with any other code. Any modification to it indicates a programming error.
Also, do note that scoped data breakpoints have had some performance problems. Again, if you care about performance calculate the address manually and set a data breakpoint without a C++ scope and make sure you don't exceed the number of available hardware watchpoint registers (IIRC there are 4 HW breakpoint registers which can watch 1,2 or 4 bytes at a given (aligned?) address). With HW watchpoints you shouldn't see any performance degradation.
-hg

Errors occurred in the integration checks (read log)

Hello Everyone ,
I am working on cross companycode- cost accounting
In the previous screen i said i am not getting cost elements box in transaction code KP06 , anyhow i am entering the itemoverview screen using one cost element which i appearing automatically and in here i am allocating funds to various activity types( here aslo its showing just one cost element as in the main screen of KP06 there was any Box asking me to enter cost element) , so i am giving all activity types with cost element plan fixed cost(entering an amount of 2000for all activity types )
&plan variable cost (entering an amount of 1000 for all activity types) nothing in plan fixed cons & plan variable consum.....remember this is just for practice purpose i am taking these small figures.
Now when i am trying to save this its giving me error which is as follows:
Errors occurred in the integration checks (read log)
Message no. GP542
Diagnosis
The data entered or changed in this planning transaction should not only be updated in controlling, but also in the related applications (such as profit centers).
These applications check the data to be posted beforehand to guarantee that the update is performed without any problems.
However, errors or warnings occurred during this check.
System Response
Data is not updated.
Procedure
Look to see which errors occurred using the function "Error log...",. "Plan Integration...".
Can anyone please help me with this one .
Thanks ,
Mohammed samiuddin

Hi,
I am also getting the same error message when I am trying to post activity type rates using Tcode KP26.
Can you please let me know how you solved this issue?
Error message :
Errors occurred in the integration checks (read log)
Message no. GP542
Diagnosis
The data entered or changed in this planning transaction should not only be updated in controlling, but also in the related applications (such as profit centers).
These applications check the data to be posted beforehand to guarantee that the update is performed without any problems.
However, errors or warnings occurred during this check.
System Response
Data is not updated.
Procedure
Look to see which errors occurred using the function "Error log...",. "Plan Integration...".
Regards,
Vicki

Kernel Sercurity Check Failure

Hi guys,
Recently, I am experiencing fews BSOD crashes on my Vaio Laptop, which is running W8. I am not sure how to read or debug .dmp file, so I am posting it here. Hopefully, someone can help me find solutions.
My minidump file: https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=77BE40A7A83A3631%2114921
Thank you so much.

Hi,
KERNEL_SECURITY_CHECK_FAILURE (139)
This bug check indicates that the kernel has detected the corruption of a critical data structure.
BugCheck 139, {2, ffffd0002288b610, ffffd0002288b568, 0}
The first argument is 2 which indicates a stack cookie instrumentation code detected a stack-based buffer overrun.
2: kd> .exr 0xffffd0002288b568
ExceptionAddress: fffff801224d53ad (NETwew00+0x000000000000e3ad)
ExceptionCode: c0000409 (Security check failure or stack buffer overrun)
NETwew00.sys caused the overrun, which is the Intel® Wireless WiFi Link driver.
2: kd> lmvm NETwew00
start end module name
fffff801`224c7000 fffff801`2280e000 NETwew00 T (no symbols)
Loaded symbol image file: NETwew00.sys
Image path: \SystemRoot\system32\DRIVERS\NETwew00.sys
Image name: NETwew00.sys
Timestamp: Thu Aug 22 17:20:34 2013
Yours is relatively dated, so please update your network drivers ASAP -
http://esupport.sony.com/perl/select-system.pl?DIRECTOR=DRIVER
If the above fails, I am very suspicious of Kaspersky causing problems (does that quite a lot on Windows 8).
Remove and replace Kaspersky with Windows 8's built-in Windows Defender for temporary troubleshooting purposes:
Kaspersky removal - http://support.kaspersky.com/common/service.aspx?el=1464
Windows Defender (how to turn on after removal)
A.Navigate
toControl Panel (with icons).
You can do this by hittingStart
> Search > Control Panel.
Once in Control Panel,
change the drop-down fromCategory
to
Large
and/or Small icons.
B.Among
the list of icons, find and click Action Center.
C.
Assuming the removal of your prior antivirus software went properly, you will notice for both
Spyware and unwated software protection (important) and
Virus protection (important), it'll have a button labeled Turn on now. Click this button (it doesn't matter which, as Windows Defender serves as
both in Windows 8/8.1).
Regards,
Patrick
“Be kind whenever possible. It is always possible.” - Dalai Lama

Code Integrity Check Failure

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for