Color looks muted and darker outside of photoshop

I have checked all the color settings in PS and nothing has changed.. My photos look one way in PS then when saved and opened elsewhere (ie: just my desktop background & others) they muted and darker. please help, I have not changed anything that I know of.
Thanks

In what image mode are you working? Creating a document in CMYK and then displaying it on a screen, which is RGB, may be the issue.

Similar Messages

  • Images look darker outside of photoshop?

    I got a new computer last month long ago and installed cs4. Everything works fine, everything looks fine. But then if I save my image to a jpg and view it outside of Photoshop, it looks so dark! I re-open that same file back into Photoshop and it looks fine again.
    I checked all my settings from the photoshop in my old computer and everything is the same. I originally thought maybe it's my monitor? but how can it be when my images look fine in photoshop?
    I really have no clue. I thought maybe it's only when i save things as jpegs? but nope. same problem with bmp, pdfs, pngs, etc. Someone help me pleasssee!! I'm a freelance graphic/web designer and I can't afford to be having this problem!

    This means you need to calibrate your monitor to get a good profile.
    Photoshop is colour managed, which means it uses the profile where non-colour managed applications don't.
    Have a look at this: http://epaperpress.com/monitorcal/index.html
    Adobe Gamma is no longer bundled with Photoshop but You can try QuickGamma: http://www.quickgamma.de/indexen.html
    In the long run, it pays to get a hardware calibration device such a the Eye-One Display.

  • My iphones colors look inverted and there are white lines flashing

    This morning I woke up and my phone was completely fine. I unplugged it from the charger and unlocked it and the screen looked like the colors were inverted and there were white lined runing across the screen that were flashing. Ive tried reseting it on itunes and the condition is only worsening. Ive turned it off for now. whats happening? what should I do?

    Basics from the manual are restart, reset, restore from backup, restore as new.  Have you tried ALL the troubleshooting steps?  If not, you need to do so.
    If the problem persists after trying ALL the above steps, you'll need to bring your phone to Apple.

  • After watching a music video or a home movie for a few minutes in my ipad, when i go back to home screen the colors look lighter and weird for some seconds, is that normal? Thanks

    IT has happened to me like three times, i use my ipad all day literally and it gets kind of hot, i have tried to take a screen shot to show it but the last time it happened(thethirth time) i was shocked, i wanted this product for so long and if this is a big problem i would be very dissapointed, please help!

    Your iPad should not get "kind of hot", but since that is subjective, what is hot to you may not be hot to me. But no matter what, it should not get too hot to hold comfortably. I use my iPad all day long a work and it never gets hot.
    If you are getting shocked when you are using the iPad, that doesn't sound normal either. But once again, that is sort of subjective as well.
    My suggestion would be to take your iPad to an Apple Store and let an Apple Genius take a look at it just to be sure that there isn't nothing wrong with it. It is still under warranty and if there is a hardware, problem, it can be replaced under the warranty.

  • Apple's Alpha Transitions and Color Looks. How to Install and Use?

    A few months ago I downloaded the Alpha Transitions and Color Looks from the FCS3 website.
    I have just re-discovered the .dmgs on one of my hard drives but my memory is a complete blank!
    I cannot remember whether I used them or installed them but seem to recollect reading some instructions somewhere!
    Where should they be installed and is there any info on using them?
    (Possibly in a few more months I will come across this info that I may have downloaded originally).

    Digging around I found most of the answers so will add them here in case anyone else suffers from a similar memory to mine!
    The Color Looks .dmg contains the instructions, the main ones being:-
    To install the Color looks
    1  Locate the Color Looks folder in the image you downloaded.
    2  Select the individual folders in the Color Looks folder and copy them to /Users/username/Library/Application Support/Color/Effects/.
    The next time you open Color, the new looks will be available in organized folders in the Color FX bin, located in the Color FX room. Opening the individual folders with categories of looks such as "Blues and Greens" and "Glows" will reveal new Color looks presets that can be applied by double-clicking.
    If you like, you can move the default looks that come with Color into these folders, to keep everything organized. You can also save your own Color FX presets into these folders.
    As for the Alpha transitions, there is of course just one, found in the Wipes folder, which is modified using the media that comes in the download.

  • Photoshop Elements 8 Mac - All fonts look jagged and pixely

    HI,
    I have the problem that all fonts look jagged and pixely when using Photoshop Elements 8 on Mac OS X 10.6.3. I am using the right image size 300dpi and so forth. Interestingly enough this only happens in Photoshop. If I repeat the procedure in Pixelmator everything is normal.
    I would really appreciate any suggestions.

    Are you simplifying the font layer and then making it larger? Can you explain exactly, step by step, what you're doing?

  • Color Looks not showing up in Color FX tab, help!

    I am running Color 1.5 on Snow Leopard, downloaded the Color Looks package and installed them in Users/Application Support/Color/Effects. However, even after a computer restart, the new effects are still not appearing anywhere in Color.
    I have also tried removing everything from Color's effects folder in Application Support, but all of the effects still stay in Color's interface and function. This has me quite confused as to the source of Color's effects.
    Anybody else had this problem? Is there some way to get Color to "refresh" and look for new additions to the Effects folder?
    Thanks.

    And the minute I post, I solve my own problem. Please disregard this post.

  • Appearance of color in Photoshop after calibration, and outside of Photoshop

    I bought an expensive monitor some time ago which claims to produce the color gamut of Adobe RGB, the NEC PA271W. I also bought an X-rite i1 Display Pro colorimeter, with software, to calibrate my monitor.
    After calibration, the images appear right when displayed in Photoshop, and such images print okay on my professional printer with professional profiles, but such images don't appear okay outside of Photoshop, when displayed on my calibrated monitor. They appear far too saturated and contrasty.
    When I check what profile is listed under the Color Management tab of my monitor, the default profile is the same as that listed among all the other profiles under Windows/system32/spool/drivers/color.
    What's going on, I wonder. Is my video card not compatible with the X-rite calibration process? The video card is the AMD Radeon HD 7700 Series.
    Any help would be appreciated.

    Vincent RJ wrote:
    I think we're either talking at cross purposes, or you are misinterpreting my words. I've always understood that the purpose of calibration is to standardise the appearance of the image on all monitors that are correctly calibrated.
    You are indeed MASSIVELY WRONG there.  Trust me, you're not even close to beginning to understand color management. What you are describing is a simplistic, deficient personal idea of Color Management, not "calibration".
    STEP ONE in Color Management:
    Calibrating and profiling are only a start of the whole Color Management process.  Calibrating and profiling your monitor does nothing, absolutely nothing for the appearance of any image on other monitors.  Trust me:  ZILCH !
    When you leave out the term "profiling" and refer to calibration alone you are talking sheer nonsense.  Get yourself into the habit of thinking of both terms together, though they are part of the one starting point in process.
    STEP TWO:
    Set your saved monitor profile after calibration as your Monitor Profile File only.  Never as your Working Space, never as something you ever embed in a file, never as a print or target profile.
    Once you have set this profile as your Monitor Profile.  You NEVER think of it again, and never mention it again—unless eventually, and for whatever reason, your monitor profile file gets corrupted, damaged or disappears by magic.
    Note that your monitor profile is a strictly device-dependent profile, it applies to nothing else in the entire world, only to your video card and your particular monitor unit.  Not even to an identical model and manufacturing batch.  Each individual monitor has its own performance characteristics (industrial tolerances of components or manufacture and all that, as well as aging of same).
    STEP THREE:
    This entails choosing your WORKING COLOR SPACE.  This will always be a device-independent (repeat: device-independent) standard workspace such as ProPhoto RGB, Adobe RGB, sRGB, etc., in descending degree of gamut width.
    STEP FOUR:
    You make absolutely sure to embed the device-independent Color Profile of your Working Color Space in your document (image file), this is called tagging your file.  This is of such enormous importance that I always say:  "If a moron hands you an untagged file, you're going to have to guess in which color space it was created.  Once you make your best educated guess, remember to go beat that moron who gave you an untagged file mercilessly with a baseball bat or simlar, heavy object!"
    This is just my way of stressing how wrong it is not to embed the color space profile in your finished file. The only worse offense would be to tag it with the wrong profile.  Tagging a file with your monitor profile should be punished by quartering or by burning at the stake.
    Again, just strong imagery to reinforce the concept.
    STEP FIVE:
    This will be using a device-dependent Printing Profile, also called a Target Profile, in the printing dialog of the Photoshop application or the RIP used by a commercial printing outfit.  This will be a device dependent profile prepared exclusively and specifically for your particular combination of ink, paper and printer.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Vincent RJ wrote:
    …I'm not referring to any conversion of numbers or RGB values…
    But of course you are Vincent RJ, you are!!!  Most definitely you are!  Why can't you grasp that basic concept? ?? !!
    With a calibrated and profiled monitor and a properly tagged image file (with the color profile of your working color space properly embedded) Photoshop will use your Monitor Profile that you set in the application as such to CONVERT and CHANGE THE NUMBERS (VALUES) of the RGB colors in your finished image BEFORE sending them to your monitor.  Every single time.  Think of that process as making up for the deficiencies of your monitor and video card combination.
    When other people look at your image, if they're using a color managed application, said application will use whatever they have set as their Monitor Profile in their setup to CHANGE THE NUMBERS of the colors in your finished image BEFORE sending them to THEIR monitors.
    If their monitors are uncalibrated and unprofiled, you don't have a prayer of a chance to control even remotely how your image will look on their screens.  That's 96% of web users, by the way. If their monitors are calibrated and profiled, the image on the screen will be reasonably close to what you see, but the gamut of their monitors (vs. your wide-gamut NEC) will necessarily change the RGB numbers and colors from what your setup does, and the variance will be greater.
    Get rid forever of your silly concept of "standardisation" or standardization, whichever way we want to spell it.  That is simply a pipe dream of yours.  If you have a big stick handy, beat up the moron who got you to believe that.  Use twice the numbers of strikes if that person is a teacher.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Lastly, I'm getting an uneasy feeling because you haven't mentioned printing at all.
    You should be aware that Color Management is defined in terms of the art and science of controlling colors from the digital image to print.  There are different variants of the definition, but they all end with the word PRINT.
    What I'm trying to say is that a person who works with images only to be observed and shown on screens does not need to bother with Color Management at all, because the minute percentage of monitor viewers I mentioned above.  Such a person can just set everything to sRGB (monitor, color space, tags, printer, etc), the lowest common denominator of profiles, and forget about anything else.
    I would hope I got through to you, but I'm not holding my breath.
    I wish you luck in your endeavo(u)rs.

  • Screen shot colors look far different in InDesign and Photoshop.

    Screen shot colors look far different in InDesign than when I vew them in Photoshop. The two program's color settings are syncronized.

    You have a profile mismatch.
    In OSX your monitor profile is assigned to a screen capture. When you open it into PS the monitor profile will get discarded, preserved, or converted depending on what your CM Policy is set to in Color Settings. If you save the capture you get the option to include the profile or not. If you include the profile and place the file in ID you should get a match. If you paste into ID there's no embedded profile and ID's RGB Working space will be assigned.
    Here I've saved a capture with no profile and placed it an ID document with ProPhotoRGB assigned (Edit>Assign Profiles...):
    If I save with the profile embedded I get a match—or I can direct-select the screen capture on the page and use Object>Image Color Settings... and reassign the monitor profile without resaving:

  • Wierd printing problem.  I have a TIFF file from a color negative scanned some years ago into Photoshop. Photoshop version probably CS2. Now printing from CS6. It prints with a black line around the image and mid grey outside that. Margins are white. Imag

    Any suggestions as to how to fix this, please?

    My printed colors look wrong. | Mylenium's Error Code Database
    Mylenium

  • Colors look different in browser window than in InDesign or Photoshop

    So, the colors look quite different (brighter) on Kuler (in
    my Firefox browser window), than when I download or copy the CMYK
    numbers exactly over to InDesign or Photoshop. In Kuler, the colors
    are significantly brighter and more saturated than how they appear
    in my design software.
    My coworker theorizes that InDesign & Photoshop are
    'compensating' for how the color will actually look when printed.
    Thoughts? Is there a setting I need to change on either
    Firefox or my Adobe software so the colors match up?

    I have a similar problem - colours look brigher in Firefox,
    IE and Photoshop, darker in Illustrator and Dreamweaver. I've tried
    resetting the color settings in Bridge, but still get the same
    difference between Photoshop, and Illustrator and Dreamweaver. I
    can't understand this at all. I don't know if it has something to
    do with the fact that I have a color profile called "Natural Color
    Pro" installed on my computer (came with the monitor) which
    Photoshop reminds me is faulty every time I open it - I tell it to
    ignore the profile. I don't seem to be able to uninstall it for
    some reason.

  • The colors appear more vibrant and redder ONLY on Photoshop

    Hello! For a long while I've had a problem with my Photoshop CS5.
    I had bought Photoshop CS5 and using it on two computers, the older one I usually use more often, it works about perfectly. But on my working laptop my Photoshop shows the colors
    differently:
    As you can see, how the colors should look like is on the right, how Photoshop twists the colors on the left.
    However, once I save the picture, the colors looks like they should (on the right) but not seeing them correctly when editing and manipulating the picture, causes a lot of problems for me and I have no idea how to fix it. It's RBG (At the moment for the web, but when actually working, then with CMYK).
    I've tried many different color settings and God knows what and nothing seems to work.

    here, the bottom image has a moderate saturation boost
    but you don't include the Doc Profile in the middle image
    (and i don't know what app that is, if it is color-managed, if it actually CONVERTING to the Monitor Profile)
    and you are using the sRGB targets (not the WhackedRGB target)
    moreover, your uploaded image (yOznPEp.png) doesn't contain an embedded profile, so it's anyone's guess what you are seeing
    but i captured the original sRGB target above yours
    i guess your middle image is unmanaged or not fully managed because my 10/10/10 black wedge is darker in your "correct" middle version
    if Photoshop is not displaying proper saturation with the settings I recommended, then your monitor profile is off
    there is a ton of search hits on how to calibrate and setup a window's monitor for photoshop
    at this point i don't know what else to add except to start slugging it out...

  • Colors are muted when opened in PS CS5, they look fine in LR & Bridge

    All of sudden when opening files in photoshope cs5 the colors are muted.  They look normal in bridge and lightroom.  I was not having this problem before, it just all of sudden happened.  Any suggestions would be appreciated.

    Check your color managment settings and proof preview - both in PS and at the system level.
    Mylenium

  • Pdf color looks different in preview and acrobat?

    I notice that the colors in various PDF files I have look different in Preview and in Acrobat. Is there some weird color profile issue?
    To be specific, I can create a PDF file in various ways, of a slide deck I originally created using Keynote. It has various different color blocks in the slides. In particular some acid green colors look very different depending on whether I open the PDF in Acrobat or in Preview.
    Preview shows the colors as they were in the original keynote application. But Acrobat shows them far more muted.
    I learned from another post that if I create the PDF by first saving to postscript and then creating the PDF using Acrobat, the issue seems to go away. However this is very inconvenient.
    In short, it seems as though there is some peculiar difference between the way Preview and Keynote (and probably Pages ) handle color and the way Acrobat handles color.
    Is there some way to fix this using some setting in one of the programs?
    By the way, this is not a new problem. I noticed it with previous OS's as well as previous versions of Keynote. I am currently using the latest version of everything.

    Same problem here. I was printing a PDF that my designer had sent me. Before I have always used Acrobat, but I've started using Preview in Leopard since it's faster and more powerful than before. But the colors were seriously wrong, often reversed completely. I believe this file was originally created in Illustrator.

  • Why are the colors in Illustrator and Photoshop so off?

    Hi,
    Let me just start off by saying I have the color mode in both Illustrator and Photoshop set to RGB. Yet, there is a noticeable color difference between a picture on the internet and when I paste it in for example Photoshop.
    Picture from the internet:
    Picture when pasted in Photoshop:
    It's the same thing in Illustrator. And this is not just with pictures by the way, it's affects all the colors I use, which is a major pain in the rear.
    Anyone know a fix?

    Well, my suggestion in post #13, was to help me find out what the cause of your problem is. It doesn’t solve your problem permanently but temporarily, only for the current session of Photoshop or Illustrator by making these programs show your image without applying any color management conversions.  So, you have to do this every time you open such files in these programs.
    If you want to understand what is going on and be in control, you have to go through a lot of walls of text unfortunately .
    I’ll try to explain it roughly but if you don’t understand it you need to read more about color management.
    You are using Safari and this is how its color management  works:
    https://developer.apple.com/library/safari/technotes/tn2220/_index.html
    on that page it says:
    "Important: For images that are not tagged with a color profile, their color values will be displayed on the screen by Safari with no optimization or adjustment for differences between devices in how they render colors. This may result in the colors not being displayed as originally intended"
    This made me think that like most images on the web, the image you are using doesn’t have a color profile. In that case, assuming a certain scenario based on your input, the reason it is displayed differently from Photoshop and Illustrator is because you have a color profile of your monitor used by your system that is different than the color space used for the display of the image. By default RGB Images without a color profile are displayed using  the color space set for the working space in the Color Settings of Photoshop and Illustrator. Also by default this color space is sRGB.  If your monitor was also with an sRGB profile assigned in the system, which is the case with all monitors that come without a color profile provided from the manufacturer, you should have not experienced this problem because Photoshop and Illustrator will see that the color space you want to display your image is sRGB and your monitor is sRGB, and there will be no color conversions because both color spaces, source and destination are the same.  Unless someone else has setup your system ,color management, and installed a monitor profile,  my guess is that the manufacturer of your monitor has provided a color profile installed in your system that is not sRGB.
    When you choose View > Proof Setup > Monitor RGB, this in effect turns off the color management because you are displaying the image in the same color space as the one assigned to your monitor.
    If you want to turn off the color management permanently which will be valid only when displaying images in the sRGB color space, you can assign the sRGB color profile to your monitor. This will show the images on your monitor with the same colors as those displayed without color management in the other applications and choosing View > Proof Setup > Monitor RGB will make no difference.
    Non color managed programs can display the color only in the way your monitor displays it. Color managed programs simulate other outputs on your monitor. The only way to match the display in color managed and non color managed software is to turn off the color managed software. This will display the same color values with the same color in all programs on your monitor.
    The purpose of the color management is to allow the viewer  see the colors as intended (the way the creator sees them when creating the image). Different devices and media output the same color values differently resulting in different color. Therefore, when the viewer uses different device or media the colors if not color managed properly will look different or not as close as possible.
    When you turn off the color management, or even when it is on but not properly applied, which I suspect is the case in your situation, you can’t be sure that the colors you see are as intended. In other words, you can’t tell if an image is supposed to look the way you see it, and you can’t create images providing means that will allow others to see them the way you see them. 
    So, for whatever reasons you want to make colors look the same in all your programs, have in mind that this is valid only on the current state of your monitor, and this also cuts the possibility to see and send to others colors as intended.

Maybe you are looking for