Combining like results into one row

The statement below works. However when the results are returned there are multiple values returned for the same "Period" that I would like to see returned into one row.
SELECT "Request ID", "External Customer", "Staff Prof Id", "Period", "Planned External", "Actual External", "Planned Internal", "Actual Internal", "Total Planned", "Actual Total"
FROM (
SELECT ppl.request_id "Request ID", ppl.mdpr_bds_ext_customer "External Customer", cells.staff_prof_id "Staff Prof Id", period.period_short_name "Period", CELLS.PLANNED_FTE/100 "Planned External", CELLS.actual_fte/100 "Actual External", 0 "Planned Internal", 0 "Actual Internal", /*skills.skill_name,*/ total.plan_total_fte/100 "Total Planned", total.actual_total_fte/100 "Actual Total"
FROM RML.MREQ_MDPR_PROJ PPL, knta.krsc_staff_prof_line_cells_v CELLS, knta.krsc_staff_prof_lines_v LINES, knta.knta_periods PERIOD, knta.krsc_skills_v SKILLS, knta.krsc_staff_prof_period_sum TOTAL
where PPL.MDPR_BDS_SUB_PROJ IS NOT NULL AND PPL.KNTA_STAFFING_PROFILE = CELLS.STAFF_PROF_ID(+) AND cells.staff_prof_line_id = lines.staff_prof_line_id AND ppl.knta_staffing_profile = total.staff_prof_id
AND cells.period_id = period.period_id AND lines.skill_id = skills.skill_id AND skills.skill_name like '%External%' AND total.period_id = period.period_id
UNION
SELECT ppl.request_id "Request ID", ppl.mdpr_bds_ext_customer "External Customer", cells2.staff_prof_id "Staff Prof Id", period.period_short_name "Period", 0 "Planned External", 0 "Actual External", CELLS2.planned_fte/100 "Planned Internal", CELLS2.actual_fte/100 "Actual Internal", /*skills.skill_name,*/ total.plan_total_fte/100 "Total Planned", total.actual_total_fte/100 "Actual Total"
FROM RML.MREQ_MDPR_PROJ PPL, knta.krsc_staff_prof_line_cells_v CELLS2, knta.krsc_staff_prof_lines_v LINES, knta.knta_periods PERIOD, knta.krsc_skills_v SKILLS, knta.krsc_staff_prof_period_sum TOTAL
where PPL.MDPR_BDS_SUB_PROJ IS NOT NULL AND PPL.KNTA_STAFFING_PROFILE = CELLS2.STAFF_PROF_ID(+) AND cells2.staff_prof_line_id = lines.staff_prof_line_id AND ppl.knta_staffing_profile = total.staff_prof_id
AND cells2.period_id = period.period_id AND lines.skill_id = skills.skill_id AND skills.skill_name not like '%External%' AND total.period_id = period.period_id)
ORDER BY "Request ID"

Probably you are looking at something like GROUP BY "Request ID", "External Customer", "Staff Prof Id", "Period" and SUM () the other columns. As Enrico says, examples of actual and desired output would be helpful.
At a glance a UNION of...
AND    skills.skill_name LIKE '%External%'...and...
AND    skills.skill_name NOT LIKE '%External%'...seems a slightly strange approach.

Similar Messages

  • How to combine many rows into one row

    Hi all,
    I have a question regarding to how to combine many rows into one row?
    My result set is like that:
    ITEM_NO NAME1
    11 abc
    11 cde
    11 fg
    Want to combine them into
    ITEM_NO NAME1
    11 abc;cde;fg
    would anybody can tell me how to do that? Thanks
    Ray

    You can check this --
    satyaki>
    satyaki>
    satyaki>create table t
      2  as
      3      select 11 ITEM_NO, 'abc' NAME1 from dual
      4      union all
      5      select 11 ITEM_NO, 'cde' NAME1 from dual
      6      union all
      7      select 11 ITEM_NO, 'fg' NAME1 from dual;
    Table created.
    satyaki>
    satyaki>
    satyaki>
    satyaki>set lin 10
    satyaki>
    satyaki>desc t;
    Name              Null?    Type
    ITEM_NO                    NUMBER
    NAME1                      VARCHAR2(3)
    satyaki>
    satyaki>
    satyaki>set lin 1000
    satyaki>
    satyaki>
    satyaki>
    satyaki>SELECT ITEM_NO,
      2         LTRIM(MAX(SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH(NAME1,';'))
      3         KEEP (DENSE_RANK LAST ORDER BY curr),';') AS NAME1_DET
      4  FROM   (SELECT ITEM_NO,
      5                 NAME1,
      6                 ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY ITEM_NO ORDER BY NAME1) AS curr,
      7                 ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY ITEM_NO ORDER BY NAME1) -1 AS prev
      8          FROM   t)
      9  GROUP BY ITEM_NO
    10  CONNECT BY prev = PRIOR curr AND ITEM_NO = PRIOR ITEM_NO
    11  START WITH curr = 1;
       ITEM_NO  NAME1_DET
            11  abc;cde;fgRegards.
    Satyaki De.

  • Combining Rowsets into one row

    Hi All,
    Can we combine Rowset 1 and Rowset2 into one row
    As there are two rowsets and nothing is common between the two rowsets so i cant do normalization.The problem due to rowset is if one rowset returns only one row and other rowset returns two rows then in Grid it shows only one Row
    Any method to eliminate this problem
    Best Regards
    Namita

    Hi Namita,
    It sounds like you need nested repeaters and an output document with columns for each field in the two rowsets.  If I understand you correctly, something like this would work:
    1. Create xMII XML Output Document with a column for each field of interest from Rowset 1 & 2.
    2. Repeat on Rowset 1
    3. Repeat on subset of Rowset 2 related to Rowset 1
    4. Add Row to Document with data from each repeater.
    5. Once you complete building your document, you can use it with an BLS (Xacute) query for the grid.
    The difficulty for me is how you would determine the subset of Rowset 2 which is related to Rowset 1.  Can you even do that?  It may require some dynamic linking (xPath) to filter Rowset 2.
    Hope this helps,
    Mike

  • Combining multiple rows into one row

    Hi all.
    My most humble apology for this question but solutions in previous threads did not seem to help much.
    Apparently, my account has not been verified and I am currently at home with no access to the SQL code so i can't post the actual code.
    We have this (mockup) of code
    Select S.C1, AViewSS.Study, AViewSS.SlotName, IST.TakenByDate, IST.ScannedByTime, SE.TimepointCalculation
    From IST
    INNER JOIN
    AViewSS ON IST.GroupID = AViewSS.GroupID and
    IST.SlotID = AViewSS.SlotID
    INNER JOIN
    S ON AViewSS.StudyID = S.StudyID
    INNER JOIN
    SE ON IST.Line = SE.Line and IST.SubLine = SE.SubLine and
    AViewSS.ScheduleID = SE.ScheduleID
    WHERE
    (IST.GroupID = 92) and (IST.SlotID between 1791 and 1795)
    and (AViewSS.VisitID = 137)
    The query currently returns this result set
    Col 1   Col 2   Taken Date  Date 1                Date 2               Date 3             
    Scanned DateTime
    Data    Data    3/12/2015  3/12/2015 7:22                                   
                    3/12/2015 7:22
    Data    Data    3/12/2015                            3/12/2015 8:47                         
    3/12/2015 8:47
    Data    Data    3/12/2015                                                    
    3/12/2015 9:27 3/12/2015 9:27
    Data    Data    3/22/2015                            3/22/2015 7:27        
                     3/22/2015 7:27
    Data    Data    3/22/2015
    Data    Data    4/12/2015
    Data    Data    4/12/2015
    Data    Data    4/12/2015
    You’ll notice that rows 1, 2, 3 are related as are rows 4, 5 and rows 6, 7, 8.
    This is what we ultimately want to see given the results above.
    In the report, rows 1, 2, 3 from the results should roll into one row with the ScannedByTimeStamp from each row returned by the query populating the appropriate report time column based on the value of a column in the row.
    Col 1   Col 2   Taken Date  Date 1                  Date 2                
    Date 3
    Data    Data    3/12/2015  3/12/2015 7:22    3/12/2015 8:47   3/12/2015 9:27
    Data    Data    3/22/2015                               3/22/2015 7:27  
    Data    Data    4/12/2015
    We would appreciate any guidance.

    Hi Duane,
    The table and matrix data regions can display complex data relationships by including nested tables,matrices, lists, charts and gauges. Tables and matrices have a tabular layout and their data comes from a single dataset, built on a single data source. The
    key diference between tables and matrices is that tables can include only row groups, where as matrices have row groups and columns groups.
    All Code in this sample are downloadable from
    this URL
    create procedure spMultiple
    as
    begin
    declare @Mytable table ([Col 1] varchar(20),[Col 2] varchar(20),[Taken Date] varchar(20),[Date 1] varchar(20),[Date 2] varchar(20),[Date 3] varchar(20))
    Insert into @Mytable ([Col 1],[Col 2],[Taken Date],[Date 1],[Date 2],[Date 3])
    select * from
    Select 'Data' as [Col 1],'Data' as [Col 2],'3/12/2015' as [Taken Date],'3/12/2015 7:22' as [Date 1],'' as [Date 2],'' as [Date 3]
    union all
    Select 'Data' as [Col 1],'Data' as [Col 2],'3/12/2015' as [Taken Date],'' as [Date 1],'3/12/2015 8:47' as [Date 2],'' as [Date 3]
    union all
    Select 'Data' as [Col 1],'Data' as [Col 2],'3/12/2015' as [Taken Date],'' as [Date 1],'' as [Date 2],'3/12/2015 9:27' as [Date 3]
    union all
    select 'Data' as [Col 1],'Data' as [Col 2],'3/22/2015' as [Taken Date],'' as [Date 1],'3/22/2015 7:27' as [Date 2],'' as [Date 3]
    union all
    select 'Data' as [Col 1],'Data' as [Col 2],'3/22/2015' as [Taken Date],'' as [Date 1],'' as [Date 2],'' as [Date 3]
    union all
    select 'Data' as [Col 1],'Data' as [Col 2],'4/12/2015' as [Taken Date],'' as [Date 1],'' as [Date 2],'' as [Date 3]
    union all
    select 'Data' as [Col 1],'Data' as [Col 2],'4/12/2015' as [Taken Date],'' as [Date 1],'' as [Date 2],'' as [Date 3]
    union all
    select 'Data' as [Col 1],'Data' as [Col 2],'4/12/2015' as [Taken Date],'' as [Date 1],'' as [Date 2],'' as [Date 3]
    ) as temp;
    with Mytable2(
    [Col 1],
    [Col 2],
    [Taken Date],
    [Date],
    [NameDate]
    as
    SELECT
    [Col 1],
    [Col 2],
    [Taken Date],
    [Date],
    [NameDate]
    FROM
    (SELECT
    [Col 1],
    [Col 2],
    [Taken Date],
    [Date 1],
    [Date 2],
    [Date 3]
    FROM
    @MyTable) as p
    UNPIVOT
    [Date] FOR [NameDate] IN ([Date 1],[Date 2],[Date 3])
    )AS unpvt
    group by
    [Col 1],
    [Col 2],
    [Taken Date],
    [Date],
    [NameDate]
    Select * from Mytable2 t1 where [date]<>''
    end
    Please Mark This As Answer if it solved your issue
    Please Vote This As Helpful if it helps to solve your issue
    Ricardo Lacerda

  • Problems with splitting result into different rows. Group by-issue?

    Hi all!
    I have a table that looks a bit like this:
    Pallet          Status          Number          Time
    A          MoveIn          48          11:11
    A          Pick          -1          11:11
    A          Pick          -1          11:12
    A          Pick          -1          11:12
    A          MoveOut     45          11:13
    A          MoveIn          45          18:20
    A          Pick          -1          18:23
    A          Pick          -1          18:23
    A          Pick          -1          18:23
    A          Pick          -1          18:24
    A          MoveOut     41          18:25
    A          MoveIn          41          21:31
    A          Pick          -1          21:55
    .....This is logging pallets that is moved to one station and then number of boxes are picked off. (For making it more simple, I only show one pallet in above example.)
    I would like to present the result with one row for each time the pallet have been at the station, like:
    Pallet          Picked          Time
    A          3          11:11
    A          5          18:20
    A          ....          .....This means that the same pallet might be showned on several rows, as it has been to the station several times. I have tried several different "GROUP BY" but I cannot make it work.
    For example I have tried to group by hour, but this fails if a pallet is moved twice per hour or if boxes are picket at different hours (eg, first box picked 09:59, last box 10:01)
    Does anyone have a suggestion how to solve this?
    Thanks in advance and Kind regards / Anders from Sweden

    Hej, Anders,
    Can you explain what defines a group?
    It looks like you're saying that a group is a sub-set of a pallet. If we arrange all the rows for a pallet in order by time, then a new group will start every time we have a row where status='MoveIn'. That is, a group consists of a row with status='MoveIn', and all the rows immediately following it, in order by time, up to, but not including, the next row with status=-'MoveIn'. Is that right?
    If so, you can use the analytic COUNT (or SUM) function to find out how many rows with status='MoveIn' have already occurred, in order by time, like this:
    WITH     got_grp          AS
         SELECT     pallet, status, time
         ,     COUNT ( CASE
                             WHEN  status = 'MoveIn'
                       THEN  1
                         END
                    ) OVER ( PARTITION BY  pallet
                                ORDER BY          time
                        )           AS grp
         FROM    table_x
    SELECT       pallet
    ,       COUNT ( CASE
                      WHEN  status = 'Pick'
                    THEN  1
                  END
                )          AS picked
    ,       MIN (time)          AS start_time
    FROM       got_grp
    GROUP BY  pallet
    ,            grp
    ORDER BY  pallet
    ,            grp
    ;If you'd care to post CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements for your sample data, then I could test this.
    This assumes that the combination (pallet, time) is unique. Your sample data includes:
    Pallet          Status          Number          Time
    A          MoveIn          48          11:11
    A          Pick          -1          11:11I assume that you're just not displaying the full time, and your data is really something like:
    Pallet          Status          Number          Time
    A          MoveIn          48          23-Sep-2011 11:11:01
    A          Pick          -1          23-Sep-2011 11:11:08Otherwise, how do you know if these two rows are in te same group or not? You may need to add a tie-breaker to the analytic ORDER BY clause. For example, if you say "ORDER BY time, *status* ", then, if the two rows above really did have exactly the same time, down to the second, then the one with status='MoveIn' would be considered to be earlier than the row with status='Pick'.

  • How to combine movie clips into one?

    In one Aperture project I have 5 short (under 1 min) movie clips that I would like to combine into one "movie", and would like to know the quickest and easiest way to do this.  I am not interested in any editing other than combining the clips into one.  Thanks!

    In Aperture the only way to combine movie clips is to create a basic slideshow, but you will get better results (stabilization, effects, etc) in iMovie or Quicktime 7, if you have it.
    In Aperture:
    Create a slideshow with the "Classic" theme: Select the two video clips in the Browser and use:   File >New > Slideshow
    Set the Default Slideshow settings (Transitions, Text, background) as you like them.
    Arrange the clips in the Time Line in the order as you want them.
    Press the "Export" button in the upper right corner to export a new video. Reimport it to Aperture.
    Regards
    Léonie

  • If I have two iTunes accounts can I combine all purchases into one account ?

    I have two active iTunes accounts but I would like to combine my purchases into one is that possible.".?

    If you mean iTunes Store accounts, no.
    If you mean iTunes libraries, import the files into the desired library.
    (105689)

  • How Do I Combine Several Images Into One Image Which Contains Links To A Series Of Web Sites?

    How do I combine several images into one such that the combined image contains a series of web links? In particular, I’d like to create such an image and put it into my Outlook email signature. At present, as per the image below, I have at least six separate images in my email signature with each image containing a web link. Is Photoshop the best tool for this job? Or would it be easier to do this in some other package? I have three packages at my disposal: Photoshop, Ilustrator and Dreamweaver. Can someone please explain in detail how I would do this? Or perhaps someone could direct me to a link that explains how to do this. Thank you.

    Thank you for that correction, Hobotor. I admit I hadn't thought about an image map, in the context of someone who doesn't seem to know HTML very well...  My thinking was running along the use of the Photoshop Slice Tool to get most of the way there...
    To expand on the above, if you were to slice up your image using the Slice Tool, say like this:
    Save for Web & Devices will create the HTML and save all the sub-images.
    Then you edit the HTML and add a (hypertext link) elements surrounding the various images.  Only thing is you'll have to set the border-style of the images to none.
    For example:
    <!-- Save for Web Slices () -->
    <table id="Table_01" width="554" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
    <tr>
      <td colspan="10">
       <img id="Sig_01" style="border-style:none" src="images/Sig_01.jpg" width="554" height="56" alt="" /></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td colspan="10">
       <a href="http://www.GrahamsWebSite.com"><img id="Sig_02" style="border-style:none" src="images/Sig_02.jpg"
            width="554" height="43" alt="" /></a></td>
    </tr>
    etc.
    A full copy of the HTML and images can be found here...  View Source to see it as an example:
    http://Noel.ProDigitalSoftware.com/temp/Graham/Sig.html
    -Noel

  • How to combine multiple webservices into one WSDL file

    Gurus,
    I have 4 four webservices(ws1,ws2,ws3 & ws4) defined in XI. Normally in XI when we define webservice ,WSDL file will be generated for each interface. Now I have 4 related interfaces, so 4 WSDL files will generated. Suppose if I have 100 webservices then 100 WSDL files need to be generated & need to send to other party to consume our services, which is very tedious task & to track also. So is it possible to combine related webservices into one WSDL file? Your inputs will be highly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Santhosh

    Hi,
             Instead of trying to combine the interfaces, you can try to define your interface mapping with 4 sender interfaces with in one interface mapping . I think this may give you the result you are expecting.
                      If you want entire content to be in one interface , then, define single interface which can accomadate, all message ocntent of all 4 interfaces.Means your sender message to contain the 4 datatypes internally.
    Regards,
    Reyaz

  • How to combine .wmv files into one file???

    Hello Apple World,
    Can someone tell me a software that will allow me to combine ".wmv" files into one? I have several files that I need to combine then add music to. VERY simple with several software packages frow Windows pc's, but I'm struggling with this since getting my first mac! PLEASE help.

    Hi:
    How can I edit MPEG or convert DVD or MPEG to DV
    http://www.sjoki.uta.fi/%7Eshmhav/SVCDon_a_Macintosh.html#edit_convertMPEG
    Matti says it better than any of us:
    how/where you can join clips with Streamclip
    Also MPEG Streamclip guide explains it.
    MPEG Streamclip can join similar MPEG files: The joined files must have the same PIDs, the same start codes, and the same audio/video properties (that is, they must come from the same source or channel).
    Using "Convert to MPEG" before joining the files can be helpful, because it changes PIDs and start codes to a default value. The preferred method to join streams is to Copy one stream in MPEG Streamclip, open another stream and Paste it there. This method checks that the joined streams indeed are compatible. Another method is to put the MPEGs in the same folder, and rename them so that they sort as desired in list view. Then select them via MPEG Streamclip's "File/Open Files..." dialog box (Shift- or Command-click to select multiple MPEGs). Then choose "Edit/Fix Timecode Breaks". After this MPEG Streamclip should report the combined length of all MPEGs (check the Log Window if you want to know whether any timecode breaks were found). Then choose "File/Convert to MPEG... or /Save As..." to save them in a single file. If the video transition between two files looks bad, you can use the Cut command to improve it. You can join very different and incompatible MPEGs with this latter method so the end result is not guaranteed to work.
    MPEG Streamclip can also edit MPEG files. Just set In/Out points (with I/O keys), Cut unwanted material off and choose "File/Convert to MPEG...". You can also Cut/Copy selections to other parts of the same stream or open another compatible stream and Paste it there. Shift-dragging the playhead can also be used to define a selection. Option + arrow keys jump to the beginning/end or In/Out points. You can use the Trim-command to more closely see a part of the video before cutting, then choose Revert Trimming to see all material. JKL-keys can be used to enable fast forward or reverse playing. The scroll wheel works also; with the Option key it scrolls 1 second per click. See the manual for more details on how to jump in single frame, GOP, 1 second, 10 second or 1 minute chunks when searching a specific spot in the video.
    Editing and trimming can be accurate only if In and Out are both on keyframes because MPEG Streamclip edits to the GOP, not to the frame. For DVD and (XS)VCD the maximum GOP size is PAL 15 and NTSC 18 frames, so the editing accuracy can be up to about 0.6 seconds. You can advance to the previous or next keyframe (i.e. I-frame, the beginning of each GOP or Group Of Pictures) with the Up/Down arrow keys -- you can also use the Edit/Go to Keyframe command to see where the In and Out points really are when editing (the In point is included in the selection, the Out point is not included). Shift + Up/Down arrow keys allow fine-tuning the selection to the GOP.
    Sue

  • SQL Query -How2bring multiple results into one field using Formatted Search

    Hi Everyone
    i am trying to bring in the results of the field dbo.Lot_ITEM.LOT using a formatted search into a row level using the following query:
    SELECT     dbo.LOT_ITEM.LOT
    FROM       dbo.DLN1 INNER JOIN dbo.LOT_ITEM ON dbo.DLN1.ItemCode = dbo.LOT_ITEM.ITEM
    WHERE     dbo.LOT_ITEM.ITEM=$[DLN1.ItemCode]
    however the result of the dbo.Lot_ITEM.LOT field could be more then one value depending on how many lots are assigned for that item
    (for example this query would be similar to assigning batch/serial numbers to an item being despatched - as you can choose multiple batches/serials depending on the quantities available and required and then move from the left to the right side of the selection window) if that makes sense!
    is it possible to bring in the multiple results into one field? and how can i amend the above query to include this?
    Thankyou in advance :o)
    Edited by: Asma Bi on Apr 23, 2008 7:22 PM
    Edited by: Asma Bi on Apr 23, 2008 7:24 PM

    Hi Suda
    Thanks for replying :o) but im not sure about the query?
    just to simplify it (as the query im working with is to do with 3rd party addons) i have used the serial/batchs field instead and used standard demo database fields from SBO 2005 sp01:
    SELECT     dbo.ixvSerialNoFact.SRI1_IntrSerial
    FROM       dbo.DLN1 INNER JOIN
                    dbo.ixvSerialNoFact ON dbo.DLN1.DocEntry = dbo.ixvSerialNoFact.SRI1_BaseEntry
    WHERE     dbo.ixvSerialNoFact.ItemCode='g1000' and dbo.ixvSerialNoFact.SRI1_BaseEntry = '193'
    The above brings me the relevant results but when i change it to be used in a formatted search:
    SELECT     dbo.ixvSerialNoFact.SRI1_IntrSerial
    FROM       dbo.DLN1 INNER JOIN
                    dbo.ixvSerialNoFact ON dbo.DLN1.DocEntry = dbo.ixvSerialNoFact.SRI1_BaseEntry
    WHERE     dbo.ixvSerialNoFact.ItemCode=$[dln1.itemcode] and dbo.ixvSerialNoFact.SRI1_BaseEntry = $[dln1.DocEntry]
    i cant seem to get it to work - now this may be because the serial number is not allocated until teh record is added to the system, however when this happens i am unable to go back in and manually trigger the query as the delivery note rows cannot be selected!
    i  think as what im originally wanting an answer for is same as this example, im wanting to know if this is even possible?
    Thanks
    Edited by: Asma Bi on Apr 24, 2008 3:53 PM
    Edited by: Asma Bi on Apr 24, 2008 3:55 PM

  • I want to combine 9 images into one so I can get them printed on a card any help or do I need an inexpensive app?

    I would like to combine 9 images into one so that I can print them on a card. Can I do this in i-photo or do I need an inexpensive app?

    No, iPhoto can't do it.  If you have Pages it can be done there very easily.  Drag all of the photos into a Pages page, resize and arrange as necessary.
    Otherwise you'll need a 3rd party image editor that supports layers.
    Some Image Editors That Support layers:
    Photoshop Elements 11 for Mac - $79
    GraphicConverter - $40
    Rainbow Painter - $30
    Imagerie - $38
    Acorn - $50
    Pixelmator - $60
    Seashore - Free
    GIMP for Mac - Free
    Xee 2.1 - free

  • Combining multi photos into one?

    I have taken several shots of a rally car going through a corner with a wide angle and would like to show the different positions of the car in the corner in one photo. the max to combine is 4 into 1

    To combine several photos into one you need a program that can do compositioning. Aperture does not really support graphics compositioning. You will need to use an extertal editor that can layer images and supports alpha channels and transparency, like the the free GIMP, Pixelmator, Graphic Converter, Photoshop, or Photoshop elements.
    With these programs you would be able to extract the cars in the different photos as a mask, make the background trasparent and overlay these masks onto the first image. This will work, provided you kept the camera pointing into exactly the same direction while taking the four pictures. Otherwise you will have to do lens correction as well to make the images match.
    Regards
    Léonie

  • Merging rows into one row but into SEPARATE Columns

    Hello Gurus,
    I have searched alot on OTN and many other places, but no where I could get the solution of how can we merge rows into one row but separate column. For example
    Consider the below scenario
    "DEPARTMENT", "EMP","NAME","SUBJECT"
    "Electronics","1","Sam","LIC"
    "Electronics","2","Pam","VLSI"
    "Electronics","3","Tom","C"
    "Mech","1","Abu","Thermo"
    "Mech","4","Lina","Machines"Now, I need the output like
    Based on Department as Group By Clause
    "DEPARTMENT", "EMP1","NAME1","SUBJECT1","EMP2","NAME2","SUBJECT2","EMP3","NAME3","SUBJECT3"
    "Electronics","1","Sam","LIC","2","Pam","VLSI","3","Tom","C"
    "Mech","1","Abu","Thermo","4","Lina","Machines"
    The row data to be loaded into separate columns. Name of the column is not an issue... can be anythingIn all the forums which I went through I could find them loading into a single column, but not into respective separate columns.
    Any help would be much appreciated.
    Thanks

    848265 wrote:
    Frank,
    I saw your name nearly n number of times, as I went through many forums today... And the link which you have just posted, I went through it today afternoon.
    Could you please explain this bit taken from your dynamic pivot post.
    SELECT     DISTINCT
         ',     COUNT (CASE WHEN job = '''
    ||     job
    ||     ''' '     AS txt1
    ,     'THEN 1 END)     AS '
    ||     job
    ||     '_CNT'     AS txt2
    FROM     scott.emp
    ORDER BY     txt1;Many Thanks.You only need that when you need column aliases based on the actual data (and you explicitly said you don't need that) or when can't put an upper bound on the number of columns to be displayed. If that doesn't apply to this problem, then don't use any kind of dynamic SQL (like the code above); it makes the job much more difficult, less efficient and less robust.
    Here's what the code above is doing.
    If you were hard-coding a query that showed the number of people in each job, and you knew that the possible jobs were 'ANALYST', 'CLERK' and 'MANAGER', then you might hard-code a query like this:
    SELECT    deptno
    ,       COUNT (CASE WHEN job = 'ANALYST'  THEN 1 END)     AS analyst
    ,       COUNT (CASE WHEN job = 'CLERK'    THEN 1 END)     AS clerk
    ,       COUNT (CASE WHEN job = 'MANAGER'  THEN 1 END)     AS manager
    FROM       scott.emp
    GROUP BY  deptno
    ;If the jobs had different names, or if there were not 3 different jobs, then you would have to change the lines in the SELECT clause that start with ", COUNT ( CASE ...".
    The code you posted is from an example of dynamic SQL, where you first run a Preliminary Query . (What you posted above is, in fact, the complete preliminary query.) The output of that preliminary query is exactly the variable part of the real query, such as:
    ,       COUNT (CASE WHEN job = 'ANALYST'  THEN 1 END)     AS analyst
    ,       COUNT (CASE WHEN job = 'CLERK'    THEN 1 END)     AS clerk
    ,       COUNT (CASE WHEN job = 'MANAGER'  THEN 1 END)     AS managerYou then use this output as part of your main query. In other words, you can write something today that will generate exacrly as many columns as you need next year, with names from the data as it is next year. How? because you're not writing the full query today. The variable part will be written by the preliminary query when it runs next year.

  • Combine multiple drawings into ONE SHEET

    Hello, this is a question on Acrobat Pro, ver 8, using Windows XP. I guess I understand how to combine multiple files into a single PDF-file. However, this morning I happened to see the option mentioned in the subject line. When you go to "Combine files" > "Getting started with combined files" and select "CAD drawings" the description reads: "Combine multiple drawings into one sheet that's easy to navigate and print". How can this be done? I need to combine 8 ea CAD drawings (already converted to PDF) into ONE SHEET for printing without having the need taping 8 pieces of paper together. Arranging the drawing within the CAD application is not an option because the files were delivered by a 3rd party company and they only deliver PDFs

    Hi Priya,
      You can do this by merging the requets.
       1. goto Se10 and right click on the request and seelct merge requests.
       2. It will ask you from request and to request. Give the request names.
       3. After merging first request contents will be added to second request and
           first request will be deleted.
      Like that you can merge 3 requests to one request.
      Let me know if you want more info.  
    Thanks & Regards,
    Siri.

Maybe you are looking for