Compile xdk beta for C++

I am trying to compile the xdk beta for C++,
I got undefined reference error. I am using the Solaris zip file.
.../schema<252> make sure
CC -o xsdtest -I../../../../xdk/include xsdtest.cpp -L../../../../lib -lxsd9 -lxml9 -lcore9 -lnls9 -lcore9 -lnls9 -lcore9 -lunls9 -lnsl -lsocket -lm
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
XMLSchema::initialize(XMLParser*) xsdtest.o
XMLParser::xmlinit(unsigned char*, void (*)(void*, const unsigned char*, unsigned int), void*, xmlsaxcb*, void*, unsigned char*) xsdtest.o
XMLParser::getDocumentElement(void) xsdtest.o
XMLSchema::validate(Element*, unsigned char*) xsdtest.o
XMLParser::xmlparse(unsigned char*, unsigned char*, unsigned int) xsdtest.o
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to xsdtest
make: *** [xsdtest] Error 1
null

What version of the Sparcworks compiler are you using? Most likely, it's V5 or V6. If so, make sure that you're using version 9.0.0.0.0A of the XDK which was compiled with V6.1 of the compiler. Previous versions of the XDK were compiled with V4.2 of the compiler.

Similar Messages

Error in compile the xdk beta release on Sun

I downloaded the xdk beta release.
I tired to compile the ./xdk/demo/cpp/schema/xsdtest.cpp.
I got the following some undefined symbol error:
/usr/local/tools/COTS/sunspro/4.2/opt/SUNWspro/bin/CC -o xsdtest -I../../../../xdk/include xsdtest.cpp -L../../../../lib -lxsd9 -lxml9 -lcore9 -lnls9 -lcore9 -lnls9 -lcore9 -lunls9 -lnsl -lsocket -lm
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
XMLSchema::initialize(XMLParser*) xsdtest.o
XMLParser::xmlinit(unsigned char*, void (*)(void*, const unsigned char*, unsigned int), void*, xmlsaxcb*, void*, unsigned char*) xsdtest.o
XMLParser::getDocumentElement(void) xsdtest.o
XMLSchema::validate(Element*, unsigned char*) xsdtest.o
XMLParser::xmlparse(unsigned char*, unsigned char*, unsigned int) xsdtest.o
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to xsdtest
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `xsdtest'
Anyone got this problem?
Thanks !
Eva

more information on the problem:
I am using the xml oracle version 9.0.0.0A.
The compiler version is
CC:Workshop Compilers 4.2. I posted this message earlier and get a reply from the xmlteam. Is that true that I need V6.1 to compiler the 9.0.0.0A correctly?
Thanks
Eva

Which is better for newbies?

Which is better for newbies, Jgrasp or Netbeans? I need something that explains errors more thoroughly than Jgrasp.

Here's my code with 3 errors. Now bear in mind that my program has compiled completely and ran correctly up to this method. All I'm trying to do with this method is get the average of all grades in a multi-array. I researched and found some code that was similar to what I needed to do but it's not working out yet. All other methods in my program work perfectly but I can't get this one to compile.
public double getMean(int allGrades[][])
          int total = 0;
          for (int grade : allGrades)
          total += grade;
     System.out.println("Total is "+getMean(grades));
          return total/allGrades.length;
} // end class GradeBookGradebook.java:100: illegal start of type
          return total/allGrades.length;
          ^
Gradebook.java:100: <identifier> expected
          return total/allGrades.length;
          ^
Gradebook.java:100: <identifier> expected
          return total/allGrades.length;
          ^
3 errors

ANN: New XDK release for 9.0.2B and 9.0.1.1.0A available

New XDK Releases for 9.0.2B Beta Version and 9.0.1.1.0A Procudtion Version are online at:
http://technet.oracle.com/tech/xml/xdkhome.html
What's new:
- Oracle9i XDK for C and C++ released on Linux
- Oracle TransX Utility Aids loading data and text.These release is part of the XDK for Java 9.0.2 Beta.
- Oracle SOAP APIs added to the XDK for Java
Support for the SOAP services have been added to the XDK for Java 9.0.1.1.0A Production.
- XML Schema Processor for Java supports both LAX Mode and STRICT Mode Validation
The XML Schema Processor for Java now supports both LAX Mode and STRICT
Mode Validation. Compared with STRICT Mode where every element from the root on down is required to be defined and validated, LAX Mode Schema validation provides developers the ability to limit the XML Schema
validation to the subsections of the XML document.
This will simplify XML Schema definitions and the validation process by skipping the ignorable content. Furthermore, with LAX mode, developers can divide their XML documents into small fragments and carry out the XML Schema validation in a parallel or progressive way. This results, in a much more flexible and productive schema validation process.
- SAX2 Extension support in the Java XML Parser
The XML Parser for Java now supports two new handlers - LexicalHandler and DeclHandler.
XML documents now can be parsed through Oracle XML Parser SAX APIs with full access
to the DTD declarations and the lexical items like comments and CDATA sections.
This ensures that the complete content model is preserved.
- JAXP 1.1 supports is now added to the XDK for Java
- New Differ Bean in the XDK for JavaBeans
A new bean has been added the the JavaBean XDK which analyses the differences between to XML documents and outputs the XSL sytlesheet that will convert one into the
other. This is extremely useful when converting an XML document retrieved from a SQL query into an xHTML page on the web.
Stylesheets can now be automaticly created for use in XSQL pages.
- XML Compression now supported in the Java XML Parser
Now developers can take advantage of a compressed XML stream when serializing their DOM and SAX outputs. This new functionality significantly reduces the size without losing any information. Both DOM and SAX compressed streams are fully compatible and the SAX stream can be used to generate a
corresponding DOM tree. These compressed streams can also be stored in Oracle as a CLOB for efficient storage and retrieval.

bump up for east cost.

Compiling c++ files for windows

I have a c++ program that I would like to compile windows binaries for. I have tried installing mingw32-gcc, and using g++, but when I run the binaries (in wine or from windows), I get errors that certain .dll files are not found. Is there additional configuration needed to set up mingw32? Or should I be using a completely separate compiler. Thanks in advance!

ewaller@odin:~/test[1] 1040 %locate libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll
/home/ewaller/Dropbox/libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll
/home/ewaller/Dropbox/wxwidgetsprojects/spacewar/src/libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll
/home/ewaller/devel/wxwidgetsprojects/spacewar/src/libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll
/usr/i486-mingw32/bin/libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll
/usr/i486-mingw32/lib/libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll
ewaller@odin:~/test 1041 %pacman -Qo /usr/i486-mingw32/bin/libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll
/usr/i486-mingw32/bin/libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll is owned by mingw32-gcc 4.6.2-1
ewaller@odin:~/test 1042 %pacman -Qo /usr/i486-mingw32/lib/libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll
/usr/i486-mingw32/lib/libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll is owned by mingw32-gcc 4.6.2-1
ewaller@odin:~/test 1043 %
ewaller@odin:~/test 1054 %locate libstdc++-6.dll
/home/ewaller/Dropbox/libstdc++-6.dll
/home/ewaller/Dropbox/wxwidgetsprojects/spacewar/src/libstdc++-6.dll
/home/ewaller/devel/wxwidgetsprojects/spacewar/src/libstdc++-6.dll
/usr/i486-mingw32/bin/libstdc++-6.dll
/usr/i486-mingw32/lib/libstdc++-6.dll
ewaller@odin:~/test 1055 %pacman -Qo /usr/i486-mingw32/bin/libstdc++-6.dll
/usr/i486-mingw32/bin/libstdc++-6.dll is owned by mingw32-gcc 4.6.2-1
ewaller@odin:~/test 1056 %pacman -Qo /usr/i486-mingw32/lib/libstdc++-6.dll
/usr/i486-mingw32/lib/libstdc++-6.dll is owned by mingw32-gcc 4.6.2-1
ewaller@odin:~/test 1057 %
waller@odin:~/test 1047 %locate pdcurses.dll
ewaller@odin:~/test[1] 1048 %
Edit: Okay, I botched that post.. I'm fixing it.... There, that is better
Edit: The plot thickens...
ewaller@odin:~/test 1070 %pkgfile pdcurses.dll
ewaller@odin:~/test 1071 %
Last edited by ewaller (2012-03-23 04:35:19)

Which Imac would be better for gaming?

So i've got a choice between these two models -
£1329.60
3.1GHz Quad-core Intel Core i7, Turbo Boost up to 3.9GHz
TB Serial ATA Drive @ 5400 rpm
8gb Ram
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M 1GB GDDR5
Apple care
27 inch model
3.2GHz quad-core Intel Core i5
Turbo Boost up to 3.6GHz
8GB (two 4GB) memory
1TB hard drive1
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M with 1GB video memory
Apple care
£1407.60
Basically, the decision is down to, do I want a slightly better graphics card and bigger screen, or a smaller screen and better processer?
I just want to gauge opinions, i'll be using it as my day to day computer as well, some video editing, but nothing too strenuous. How big is the difference in graphic and processing powers.
Thanks for your help

With all due respect the question was "which iMac would be better for gaming?". Key word here is 'better', not 'perfect', not 'ideal'; just 'better'. Unqualified answers and/or sweeping statements do very little to contribute to a discussion, let alone answer the question under consideration.

I am going to buy a macbook pro for grade 12, and I need to know wheather I should get a macbook pro or a macbook pro retina. If someone could tell me (in a very simple way) which one is,better for me and why, I would be ever so apprreciative.

I am going to buy a macbook pro for grade 12, and I need to know wheather I should get a macbook pro or a macbook pro retina. If someone could tell me (in a very simple way) which one is,better for me and why, I would be ever so apprreciative.

Why do you need a expensive MacBook Pro?
Your attending high school and unless everyone else is rich also your likely going to be a target by the more poorer students for theft or damage to the machine.
You could keep it home, but if you need it for class then your exposed again.
Also at that age your not very careful yet, a MacBook Pro is a expensive and easily damaged machine.
Unless your made of money and so are others at your school, I would recommned a low profile, just does the job cheap Windows PC.
If it dies, gets lost, stolen or damaged because of your inexperince handling senstivie electronics then it's no big deal.
You can buy a Mac later on when your sure you have a need for it, currently there isn't much advantage of owning a Mac compared to a PC, they do just about the same things now, one just looks prettier than the other.
Since 95% of the world uses Windows PC's your going to have to install Windows on the Mac in order to keep your skills up there or be unemployed, so it's a extra headache and expense.
good luck

Vmware Fusion Beta for Mac OSX Released Today

I don't know if this is the correct forum; if it's not, please pardon me.
VMware Fusion Beta for Mac OSX has been released today. This product, while the developers admit has some bugs in it, promises to make virtual computing a whole lot easier and would eliminate for many (not all) the need to use Boot Camp. The link for this new program is http://www.vmware.com/products/beta/fusion/
On that page you can find links for support and forums as well.
If you need a free virtual appliance to use with Fusion, then use this link http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/appliances/
Currently, there is no charge for using the BETA program. The VMWare folks are asking people to give feedback on their use of the product.
This is what we've been waiting for to purchase our new MAC. I can say without a doubt that from my own experience with Linux boxes, VMWare is the best virtual solution on the market. It's easy to configure and supports a wide variety of hardware and OSs. I can even move the virtual machines I created under Linux to my new MAC when I receive it.
The time has finally dawned for me to retire the last remaining pc towerbox in my home. My wife and I recently expunged one of those machines earlier this week and are eagerly looking forward to getting rid of the other one.
We am really looking forward to purchasing the new Mac Pro. What makes it especially appealing for us is it's scalability and the fact that we can use our current hardware,including our Kensington Track Ball mouse and current monitor with it, although we are taking a serious look at a new Apple Display as well.
Many thanks to everyone for taking the time to read this post. I am looking forward to joining and my wife is looking forward to rejoining the MAC community.

You might try the VMWare beta forum:
http://www.vmware.com/community/forum.jspa?forumID=371
Susan

Which is better for doing animation? Flash 4, 5, MX, CS, or others?

Which is better for doing animation? Flash 4, 5, MX, CS, or
others?
I am used to using brush function more conveniently in Flash
4 than the other versions I ve tried. However, Flash 4 doesn't have
pen tool.
Free News Reader
http://put.hk
http://put.hk/reader/forums.macromedia.com/macromedia.flash.html

1Evan2Wing3 wrote:
> Which is better for doing animation? Flash 4, 5, MX, CS,
or others?
>
> I am used to using brush function more conveniently in
Flash 4 than the other versions I ve tried. However, Flash 4
doesn't have pen tool.
all pretty identical tho I would go with cs, just because I
like the GUI much
more than other versions...
Best Regards
Urami
"Never play Leap-Frog with a Unicorn."
<urami>
If you want to mail me - DO NOT LAUGH AT MY ADDRESS
</urami>

Which is better for bulk message scenario in sap xi RFC or Proxy

which is better for bulk message scenario in ( RFC or Proxy ) ?
Edited by: prabhatxi on Aug 6, 2010 4:44 PM

Proxy will alwaays be better option in this case, as it is adapter less framework, and communication happens directly with XI central integration engine. So it is always fast communication and gives good performance.
But still you should consider other factors, you may consider using RFC as well, as sometime we go for RFC/IDOC as this are the standard interfaces already available rather than creating structure...
May be you can share more info on what type/volume data are you planning to send via XI?
Hope this cleart your doubt..
Divyesh

Which is better for servers, Apache or Tomcat?

Which is better for servers, Apache or Tomcat?

For some reason that link I gave you isn't working right now, but it was today, weird. I would get Tomcat simple because sun uses it in its examples and recommends it. Here's sun's link then, it's probably more useful anyway. http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/

Which is better for music production: macbook air or pro?

Which is better for music production: macbook air or pro?

The MacBook Pro has higher specifications, depending
on the model, and then CTO additional upgrades.
The Air does not have a Retina display, but has lesser
specs, so that may make a difference. They still offer a
low-end MB/Pro w/ optical drive, w/o Retina; specs vary;
it may work in your instance. You'd have 14 days to take
a new Apple computer back, so keep that in mind.
Good luck!

Which is better for gamming, Macbook Pro 13'' or Macbook Pro 13'' Retina?

Which is better for gamming, Macbook Pro 13'' or Macbook Pro 13'' Retina?

LowLuster wrote:
You are certainly welcome to your opinion. I'll stick to my reply.
In view of the fact that there are numerous applications that run properly while creating a lot of internal heat in a MBP indicates that it does not follow that heat is an inhibiting factor (within designed parameters). Thus my comment is certainly not opion, rather fact. You certainly are entitled to your reply but a third party reader should be be apprised of what the facts are.
Ciao.

Which is better for outdoor music bluetooth or airplay speakers?

which is better for outdoor music listening airplay speakers or bluetooth, cost, etc.?

The MacBook Pro has higher specifications, depending
on the model, and then CTO additional upgrades.
The Air does not have a Retina display, but has lesser
specs, so that may make a difference. They still offer a
low-end MB/Pro w/ optical drive, w/o Retina; specs vary;
it may work in your instance. You'd have 14 days to take
a new Apple computer back, so keep that in mind.
Good luck!

Which is better for physical therapy graduate student, a MacBook air or MacBook pro?

Which is better for a physical therapy graduate student, a MacBook air or MacBook pro?

Macbook Air
I cannot see you using strenuous applications to help you with a Physical Therapy Degree.
Have a think of whether you want an 11" or 13".
I'd recommend the 13" because although the 11" is perfect for taking notes in class etc.; when it comes to performing as a desktop and not sitting on your lap, it can seem too small.
The 13" is the best of both worlds. You can keep the portability and the power in one.
Make sure you get a large enough SSD, they always fill up fast with documents and possibly downloaded text books etc.
With the 13" if you decide to create a innovative project or a collection of photos, you can also use more RAM-consuming applications like iPhoto and iMovie, or even Aperture without worrying about freezing.

Compile xdk beta for C++

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for