Confirmation activity:start time greater than remaining start time

Hello Experts
While CIFing Production orders I am getting the above error "confirmation activity:start time greater than remaining start time". or sometimes the error says "invalid confirmed start time of an activity"
I have checked the inter operation times for the operations & have ensured that the Min & max values are same.
I have attached the screen shot also.
Kindly advise
Regards
Soum

Hello,
I guess you háve implemented BAdI method MODIFY_AFTER_MERGE (/sapapo/cl_ex_cif_ip in SE18).
Deactivate it.
The mentioned error means that an activity has its  start date larger than confirmed date that's wrong for liveCache.
Standa

Similar Messages

  • Java always returns 15 minutes greater than the current time.

    Hi,
    I am using Microsoft Windows Server 2003R2,Standard X64 edition with Service Pack 2 and jdk1.6.0-03.
    Java always returns time 15 minutes greater than the current system time.
    eg:
    SimpleDateFormat simpleDateFormat=new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss");
    System.out.println("Now time: "+simpleDateFormat.format(new Date()));
    System.out.println("Now time: "+new Date());The output of the program is :
    Now time: 2008-12-22 18:47:04
    Now time: Mon Dec 22 18:47:04 NPT 2008
    When my actual system time is 6:32 PM or (18:32)
    I have checked the current time with other programming languages like python and it always returns the actual date and time.
    Note: To my observation java is always utilizing a time which is 15 minutes greater than the current time even for its log.
    Thanks,
    Rajeswari (Msys)

    I think a more practical time machine would be one that actually travels back in time rather than forward (by 15 minutes). Sounds like it needs some more work.
    Anyway, I suggest changing the system time on your computer to some other value (say, 2 hours ahead), then running the program again. If its off by 2 hours and 15 minutes, its getting the time from your computer. However, if its still off by only 15 minutes (from your wristwatch's time), then its getting the time form somehere other than the computer clock.

  • How to zero the values that are greater than 0 at time 0?

    Hello, New user,
    I would like to know how to zero values that are greater than 0 at time 0.  I am totalizing gas flow and understand how not to add the negative numbers but am unsure about the positive numbers at 0 flow.  I hope I have explained this good enough.
    Thank you,
    Lisa

    I don't understand why the value which should be 0 is actually greater than 0.
    How do you determine that the value should be 0, such as no flow, even if the value is greater than 0?
    Ryan Shi
    Hello Ryan,
    The system itself may have an offset of 0.1 V which in the program is related to flow.  I do not wish to add this .1 as flow.  I want to beable to reset the values to 0 and then when there is flow, to add the flow.   If you purchase a program from some vendors you can zero the channel, that is my goal.  I want this to be automatic when a switch is pressed.  Such as:  for 20 seconds, average channel, and use that value as 0 flow then add flow??   I was told averaging may work??
    Thank you again,
    Lisa Williamson

  • How can I use the database default time rather than Java supplied time

    I've searched over and over and nobody seems to have this issue so maybe its just me!
    When inserting a record I would like the a create_date column to automatically use the database time rather than a supplied time via JPA. That was all times a relative to the database which makes sense.
    The trouble is I cant figure out how to do this in a sensible manor.
    If I specify an column like :
         @Temporal(TemporalType.TIMESTAMP)
         @Column(name = "CREATE_DATE")
         private Date createDate;
    and IDL
    CREATE_DATE TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE DEFAULT CURRENT_DATE NOT NULL
    If I leave createDate null I get an exception. If modify the column to allow Nullable then column is set as Null.
    If I leave the column out of the entity bean and then and create a row then the database current time is inserted. The trouble then is that if I want to read the date I'm going to have to create a copy of the bean but with the CREATE_DATE in it, and this doesn't make sense.

    I should also mention that TopLink has always supported the ability to retrieve the current time from the database for use in optimistic locking. The TimestampLockingPolicy offers the ability to configure the next value being retrieved from the database instead of using the local time from the JVM. Our extended optimistic locking configuration does not currently support setting this option but it could be done using a descriptor customizer which can be configured in your persistence unit properties.
    Using optimistic locking may be a good solution for the last modified date since it will also ensure that you do not corrupt the database if someone else has incremented this value since your last read.
    Doug

  • How do i get siri to set a reminder for a time other than the appt time. For example:  I want Siri to remind me at 10:00 pm on Monday that I have a dentist appt. at 9:00 am on Tuesday. She screws up the dates and times no matter what I say

    What I can't figure out is how to set a reminder for a time other than the appt time. For example:  I want Siri to remind me at 10:00 pm on Monday that I have a dentist appt. at 9:00 am on Tuesday. She screws up the dates and times no matter what I say

    "Remind me at 10:00 pm on Monday".  Siri: "Ok, just tell me what you want to be reminded about".  "I have a dentist appointment on 9:00 am on Tuesday".  Siri should set it up correctly.

  • Numbers function IF greater than using date & time

    I am trying to produce a number sheet that will allow me calculate a working rota for staff.
    The problem i am having is when i try and use a IF function to remove 1hr (for lunch) if the person works 8 hours or more.
    If that person works between 6 and 8 they require a 30 mins lunch.
    I have already setup the sheet to calculate the total shift time by subtracting the starting time from the finishing time. i.e. 18:00 - 08:00 = 10hrs
    Now i need it to subtract 1hr for lunch.
    It should read something like IF 10 >8 then -1 from 10.
    I just don't know how to not cause an error.
    ideally i would like it to be able to handle 2 IF's in the one cell. if its 6-8hrs - 30mins or if its greater than 7 -1 hr.
    I currently have all the cells set at time and date.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Richard

    this works a little but it seems to subtract 0.5 and then 1 removing to much time.
    I have attached a link which i hope will explain this better.
    https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=82B56CEF9A61CDE9!8770&authkey=!ALJn-lja2b2 q1iw&ithint=file%2cnumbers
    Thank you for your help

  • V$UNDOSTAT BEGIN)TIME GREATER THAN SYSDATE

    I have 18 rows in V$UNDOSTAT with begin_time greater than sysdate.
    what could have caused that?
    I noticed this anomaly when i was looking for some undo information.
    All that has happened recently is, I have restored the db (9.2.0.1 on REHL 3)
    on a different server as the original server had a bad disk (RAID5 rebuild was taking too long). So i shutdown the db and copied all files from the last cold backup to the new server(same config)and restored all the archlogs. Everything has been going fine since than.
    Would a db bounce reset the date anoamly??
    Any ideas !!!
    Thankyou

    Hello,
    Yes you are right, the MAXQUERYLEN of the query *60mwzy51cs6sx* is very high (213380 seconde = 2,5 day) :
    07-21-2010 16:48:2010 213380 60mwzy51cs6sx
    07-21-2010 20:07:2010 225213 60mwzy51cs6sxAnd more over, it seems that the same query repeat several time and the MAXQUERYLEN is higher and higher.
    You may get the offending query as follow:
    Select sql_text from v$sqltext where sql_id = '60mwzy51cs6sx'  /* MAXQUERYID value */It seems that the MAXQUERYLEN is never resetted for this query.
    If you are sure that this query is not still running for almost 3 days so, I don't know why there's this kind of behaviour and, if I were you, I'll ask to the support.
    Best regards,
    Jean-Valentin

  • How to find login times greater than 24 hours from custom table.

    Hello Guru's,
    I am having trouble approaching how to construct a query that will find who has been logged in for more than 24 hours, this table is updated every few hours to show who's logged in and where- I am attempting to find out if someone has been logged in for more than 24 hours- if so, who and where. This is difficult for me because I need to compare each recorded for each user login and then see if the next entry is greater than 24 hours from the previous entry.
    A table holds the login times and locations as table position_hist:
    position_id,userid,upd_date.
    Something like;
    select position_id,userid,upd_date from position_hist where (select upd_date from position_hist where "the next entry for that user and that position is greater than 24 hours?????"
    I guess the easier way to look at it is for a given position_id who has been logged in for more than 24 hours in one go.
    Any advice would be brilliant :-)

    It's hard without knowing your Oracle version, or having any sample data to work with. Please post that in the future using \ tags and DDL/DML.
    Here is what I came up with as a guess:SQL> WITH POSITION_HIST AS
    2 (
    3 SELECT 1 AS POSITION_ID, 1 AS USER_ID, TRUNC(SYSDATE) AS UPD_DATE FROM DUAL UNION ALL
    4 SELECT 1 AS POSITION_ID, 1 AS USER_ID, TRUNC(SYSDATE)+1 AS UPD_DATE FROM DUAL UNION ALL
    5 SELECT 1 AS POSITION_ID, 1 AS USER_ID, TRUNC(SYSDATE)+2 AS UPD_DATE FROM DUAL UNION ALL
    6 SELECT 1 AS POSITION_ID, 1 AS USER_ID, TRUNC(SYSDATE)+4 AS UPD_DATE FROM DUAL UNION ALL
    7 SELECT 3 AS POSITION_ID, 2 AS USER_ID, TRUNC(SYSDATE) AS UPD_DATE FROM DUAL UNION ALL
    8 SELECT 3 AS POSITION_ID, 2 AS USER_ID, TRUNC(SYSDATE)+1 AS UPD_DATE FROM DUAL UNION ALL
    9 SELECT 3 AS POSITION_ID, 2 AS USER_ID, TRUNC(SYSDATE)+2 AS UPD_DATE FROM DUAL UNION ALL
    10 SELECT 4 AS POSITION_ID, 21 AS USER_ID, TRUNC(SYSDATE)+2 AS UPD_DATE FROM DUAL
    11 )
    12 SELECT POSITION_ID
    13 , USER_ID
    14 FROM
    15 (
    16 SELECT POSITION_ID
    17 , USER_ID
    18 , UPD_DATE - LAG(UPD_DATE) OVER (PARTITION BY USER_ID ORDER BY UPD_DATE) AS LOGGED_IN_TIME
    19 , ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY USER_ID ORDER BY UPD_DATE DESC) RN
    20 FROM POSITION_HIST
    21 )
    22 WHERE LOGGED_IN_TIME > 1 AND RN = 1
    23 /
    POSITION_ID USER_ID
    1 1                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

  • Effective start date greater than effective end date in per_all_people_f

    Hi !
    Upon running the perus11i.sql, we found that there are overlapping of dates and effective_start_date > effective_end_date in per_all_people_f.
    Can somebody point me to right link for the document that can fix this problem?
    We're currently using using 11.5.10i
    Appreciate any help.
    Thank You
    Elmer

    Somehow the person records for this person have become corrupted. Have you any idea how that might have happened? Options:
    1) Someone or some program has issued a direct table update on per_all_people_f
    2) Someone has used Help > Diagnostics > Examine to modify the data
    3) An Oracle bug. This one is unlikely but could happen if using an unusual form (Shared Person Form, for example) and perform a weird combination of actions/keystrokes. But you'd need to be able to reproduce it if you want Oracle to fix it.
    If you're support contract is invalid or you don't have a support contract your options are limited. You can either:
    a) Bring your patch level up-to-date and then raise an SR. If Oracle agree to provide a script to fix it they'll probably just do direct table updates to resolve this record.
    b) Fix this yourself using direct table updates. This obviously isn't supported either. If you do this, make sure you know what you're doing and get it 100% right first time. BE VERY CAREFUL!
    Obviously I strongly recommend option b.

  • How to display a time greater than 24hrs?

    Hi all
    I am trying to create a wages tracker by entering start and finishing times for each day, working out the time worked and then adding it all together to get a weekly value. This works fine and if I have 5 days at 9hrs it correctly gives me 45h.
    Then I want to create an IF function to say if the total hours worked for that week are more than 35h display the amount of overtime worked (in this case it would be 10h) else display "No OT Worked".
    This is what I have so far but all I get is "Durations can't be compared to other data types". I'm guessing it's because in the IF formula I have specified 35 and with this being a number and not a time it's giving the error. Can anyone help me solve this please :-)
    Thanks

    Crofty,
    You should be able to get the "35h" to work. It's so much handier than the DURATION function that it would be worth it to learn to use the direct notation.
    When you tried using "35h", what didn't work. Did you get an error message, a wrong result?
    Jerry

  • Query to find three times greater than the other records

    hi All,
    I am new to this forum, please help me out on this issue.
    There is a table named as regions which has following columns like name, region, population, area with the following sample records
    Region Name Population
    AAA AAAA 1000
    AAA BBBB 2000
    AAA CCCC 500
    BBB DDDD 900
    BBB EEEE 300
    I need to pick the record which has population more than three times that of any of their neighbours (in the same region). I need to get the region and name as the output. Please help me on how to write this query.

    with
       your_data as
       select 'AAA' as col1, 'AA' as col2, 7000   as col3 from dual union all
       select 'AAA' as col1, 'BB' as col2, 2000   as col3 from dual union all
       select 'AAA' as col1, 'CC' as col2, 500    as col3 from dual
    select *
    from
       select
          col1,
          col2,
          col3,
          case when col3 >= lag(col3) over (partition by col1 order by col3 asc) * 3
          then
             dense_rank() over (partition by col1 order by col3 desc)
          else
             0
          end as the_rank
       from
          your_data
    where
         the_rank = 1;
    COL CO               COL3           THE_RANK
    AAA AA               7000                  1
    1 row selected.
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.01
    TUBBY_TUBBZ?This code will return AT MOST one name for each region (assuming 1 or more qualify based on your description).
    Is that what you want?

  • I am using ITC Mobile for iBooks.  What is the difference between "Units" and "Total".  Sometimes Units is greater than Total, other times Total is greater than Units, and sometimes they are equal.  I am so confused.

    Any help would be appreciated

    Just to recap, this is a collection of ports I have collected over time for people who needed this information when setting up the HP ePrint app so that they could view their email from within the app.  I am certain other applications also need this information.  Although lengthy, I could not find a more comprehensive place to retrieve this information.  Feel free to post additional information, faulty information, or other related topics below as this is simply a collection of data and it would be practically impossible to test all of them. Thank you!
    Don't forgot to say thanks by giving "Kudos" if I helped solve your problem.
    When a solution is found please mark the post that solves your issue.
    Every problem has a solution!

  • Calculating Remain Finish Date/ Remain Start Date

    Problem:
    I have an issue where I can't change the finish date because the following error message: Remain Finish date cannot be earlier than Remain Start Date.
    I want to change end date to Jan 25 but it keeps calculating/inputting Feb. 18
    Observed:
    All the Predecessor for this activity and the activity start date have been Actualized (December 21 or December 12). I do notice that Early Start for this activity is Feb. 18.
    I tried modifying the Duration: "remaining" and "at complete". I kept "remaining" at 0d; which keeps the date to Feb. 18; however, the "at complete" also gave me an same error message as above.
    Questions:
    1.) How do they calculate Remain Finish Date/Remain Start Date?
    2.) From my observation, my assumption is that early start is causing the calculation of Remain Start Date to stay at Feb. 18. If my assumption is correct, what do I need to push it back to mid-January?
    3.) What should I do?

    The early start of Feb 18th means either a constraint or another acitivity is pushing it out the start to Feb 18th (or you data date is set there).
    Check to see if there are any constraints on the activity.
    Even though you say the predecessors are actualized, running with retainined logic will cause any acitivities to push out if ANY predesessors are not statused. You will need to look at the predecessors of the predecessors (in some cases all the way back to the first activity).
    You can fix this by breaking the links to the non-finished predecessors or by changing the retained logic setting to progress override in the schedule options menu. This is usually not recommended and can cause unrealistic schedules.
    Try and find an activity that ends on Feb 17th. More than likely this activity will be tied to the one you want to change.

  • MAXDB service (Windows XP)  remains 'Starting'

    Dear experts,
    I'm running MaxDB with minisap trial version (Netweaver 7.01). It was running fine for months. This week I couldn't get my instance to run. The computer was locked on starting sometimes. I could see the cause on Windows Services: MaxDB was showing STARTING and didn't have any options for Stop or Restart. The only way to stop it was to restart or shut down Windows.
    In Windows Services, I had to change the setting back to Manual (from Automatic). By restarting Windows I get it to shut down, but when I start the Service again, it opens very slowly and then right before completing the operation it throws up an Error Message 1053: service couldn't start in timely manner. It doesn't stop the service, it keeps running and shows STARTING.
    I tried killing kernel.exe in Task Manager, but it just restarts again. It seems like there is something else going on, I don't know how to solve the problem.
    Any suggestions?
    Thank you very much,
    Sergio

    Hello Markus,
    I never made any backup of DB.
    After restart Windows, I tried to start NSP Service and remains STARTING like always. The command I had execute is this:
    x_ cons NSP sh ac 1
    and the anwser is a bucle like this
    SERVERDB: NSP
    ID   UKT  Win   TASK       APPL Current         Timeout Region     Wait
              tid   type        pid state          priority cnt try    item
    ID   UKT  Win   TASK       APPL Current         Timeout Region     Wait
              tid   type        pid state          priority cnt try    item
    ID   UKT  Win   TASK       APPL Current         Timeout Region     Wait
              tid   type        pid state          priority cnt try    item
    ID   UKT  Win   TASK       APPL Current         Timeout Region     Wait
              tid   type        pid state          priority cnt try    item
    I had to stop it using CTRL + C.
    In Windows Services I can´t stop or restart NSP service, it remains STARTING until I restart Windows.
    It's seems like NSP service is locked. Any idea?
    Thank you very much.
    Regards.

  • From Date is greater than End Date of a BBP document.

    Hi,
    There is a BBP document created in the system which has From Date (BBP Start Date) greater than End BBP Date.
    Have any one come across this type of issue.
    Can any one tell what can be the reasons for this to happen?
    Also in this case there are no entries for the items in this BBP document in database table DFKKMOP.
    Thanks in advance,
    Hrushikesh

    Hi Hrushikesh,
    Could you please check the details at billing document level if any of them is having the bad data.
    Also, please check the data passed and the importing data for the below FM's in debug mode.
    1. START_TIME_DETERMINE
    2. END_TIME_DETERMINE
    I am not sure, but have heard about the similar issue in one of the project, but it was related with invoicing not specific to BBP.
    Let me know the data received for the above FM's, also, will check if I can get any specific details for the same.
    Regards,
    Rajesh Popat

Maybe you are looking for