Connection limit with ACP7

I am using Adobe Connect Pro 7 licensed for 20 concurrent users. I am trying to get about 12 - 14 participants to join my meeting, but for some reason it seems to be limiting me to nine Participants. After that the participants that try to enter hang on the connection screen with an eventual server error. I had about three participants trying to connect that were hanging on the connection screen, and when I removed three other participants from the meeting, the ones that were hanging connected.
It is my understanding that 20 is a soft limit, and I see nothing in the server or meeting settings that would limit the number of participants. It also does not give any message about exceeding any limit.
I was wondering if there might be some kind of setting on the server itself ( as in the physical Server 2003 OS software) that might limit the connections, or possibly network settings?? I am currently at a loss to figure out what the problem is. Does anyone have any suggestions??
Update:
Discovered warnings in the application event viewer:
1) Source = FMS [Core] Connection Rejected by Server. Reason:[License Limit Exceeded]: [_defaultRoot_,_defaultVHost_]:Max connections allowed exceeds license limit. Rejecting connection to:meetingapp@localhost:8506/7/20602/.
2) Source = FMS [Master] Connection Penalty activated at time 1244644052.424488 with connections 11 and limit 10.

In my case, I discovered that I had two license files in C:\breeze\comserv\win32\licenses. I am not certain what happened, but the license.lic file which the program was using had no reference to FMS in it. I had a second file named license.lic.old which has a reference to FMS in it. I renamed the old file to replace the license.lic file and restarted the Flash Media Server (FMS) service, and I was able to join 20 participants again. It's been a while, so I don't recall what the files look like, but it was definitely the license file that was the root of the problem. Hopefully it will at least give you a place to start - no one ever responded to my post, so I just kept digging. Good Luck!

Similar Messages

Too many connections - limit of 150 reached

We ran into a situation where a program (written in PHP, running under Apache) was spawned via crontab every 30 seconds for test purposes. It connected to the database but did not disconnect.
Net result: Once the program had been started 150 times, the database refused any more connections. No valid users could connect. I couldn't even connect from the oracle privileged account.
Item 1: The process will be modified to explicitly close its connection when done, rather than trusting the job to default behavior of PHP. So, hopefully, we will not run into this a second time.
Item 2: But if we do have this problem again, I need to know how to intervene when the connection limit has been reached. I was not able to connect myself and therefore could not query v$process or related tables to gather any information. I could kill the various (useless) listener processes at the unix command line, but it still took time for Oracle to sense the dead process and mop up. How to accomplish this quickly?
Item 3: I can probably set up the rogue process to login as a different user and then set a resource profile for that user including timeouts. Any suggestions on values for that resource profile?
Item 4: Is there a way to reserve a listener connection for a privileged account such as the DBA?
Thanks for any guidance.
-- Chris Curzon

ChrisCurzonDBA wrote:
Thanks for the friendly reply.
What worried me was that I had to wait for the useless connections to clear, before I could connect and see what the sessions were. Yes, Oracle had to roll back any uncommitted work, and there's no way to speed that up, but I wanted to see that processes from inside of Oracle (connected) not from outside.
Is it possible to configure the listener to "reserve" one connection for a privileged account? No.
It is not the listener's responsibility. In fact, it is not even the listener's responsibility to maintain existing connections. Once the listener services the connection request, it is totally out of the picture. You can even kill the listener, and any existing connections will continue on. It's like being introduced to someone at a party. Once you are introduced to someone (by The Listener), you carry on your conversation with that person directly, not through the person (The Listener) who introduced you.
>
-- Chris

SFTP connection issue with Dreamweaver 2014

I have a very weird SFTP connection issue with Dreamweaver CC (2014). I am on a Mac running 10.9.4 and have no problem connecting to my server through SFTP with Dreamweaver CS 6. However, using the exact same settings on CC (2014), I get the following error: "An FTP error occurred - cannot make connection to host. Your login or password is incorrect. Please check your connection information".
I am truly at a loss here. Command line connection works without problems.
Any thoughts?

Hi there,
Try after rebooting your system or in a different user account on MAC.
Is there any limit with number of login sessions with your SFTP?
Could you check with Filezila or similar FTP client and connect to your site, see if you get any error there?
Thanks.

Opening multiple reports in Crystal Reports for VS causes database connect limit to be reached. Seems to be no way to force Crystal Reports to close database connection (other than exiting application)

I am working on upgrading an application that has been in use for many years. The application is written in VB6 and I have been tasked with upgrading the current application to Crystal Reports for Visual Studio. I am using Crystal Reports for VS Version 13.0.12.1494. The system's database is a Sybase SQL Anywhere 16 database with an ODBC connection using integrated login. Each of the reports has the database connection set up from within the report. There is only once database server, so each of the reports are pointing to the same DB. The database server is currently installed as a "Personal Server" with a limit of 10 connections.
I have implemented the CR viewer as part of a COM-callable wrapper that exposes a COM interface for VB6 to interact with. Inside of my viewer component is a Winform that embeds the Crystal's Report viewer. The COM interface basically maps the basic Crystal apis to methods that the VB6 can call (i.e., Load Report, Set Field Text, Update SQL Query, etc). This architecture is working as designed and the reports are displaying correctly and responding correctly to changes in queries, etc.
The issue is that after I open 9 reports, the tenth one will respond with an error indicating that the database connection limit has been reached. The database connections used by the reports aren't released until after the application is closed. The application is designed for a secure environment that prohibits the non-administrative user from accessing the systems desktop, so asking the user tor restart the application after 10 reports isn't a viable option.
I have checked and database connection pooling is turned off for the SQL Anywhere 16 driver.
I have been digging on this for a few days and have tried adding code in the FormClosed event to close and dispose of the Report Document as follows:
ReportDocument reportDoc= (ReportDocument) crystalReportViewer1.ReportSource;
reportDoc.Close();
reportDoc.Dispose();
GC.Collect();       // Force garbage collection on disposed items
I have also tried the following (as well as maybe 20 or so other permutations) trying to fix the issue with no success.
ReportDocument reportDoc= (ReportDocument) crystalReportViewer1.ReportSource;
foreach (Table table in reportDoc.Database.Tables)
     table.Dispose();
crystalReportViewer1.ReportSource = null;
reportDoc.Database.Dispose();
reportDoc.Close();
reportDoc.Dispose();
reportDoc = (ReportDocument)crystalReportViewer1.ReportSource;
GC.Collect();       // Force garabe collection on disposed items
Any ideas or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. I have been pulling my hair out on this one!

Hi Ludek,
Thanks so much for the quick reply. Unfortunately I did not have time to work on the reporting project Friday afternoon, but did a quick test this morning with some interesting results. I'm hoping if I describe what I'm doing, you can show me the error of my ways. This is really my first major undertaking with Crystal Reports.
If I simply load the report, then close and dispose, I don't hit the limit of 10 files. Note that I do not logon manually in my code as the logon parameters are all defined within the reports themselves. The logon happens when you actually view the report. Loading the report doesn't seem to actually log in to the DB.
What I did was create a very simple form with a single button that creates the WinForm class which contains the Crystal Viewer. It then loads the report, sets the ReportSource property on the CrystalReportsViewer object contained in the WInForm and shows the report. The report does show correctly, until the 10 reports limit is reached.
The relevant code is shown below. More than I wanted to post, but i want to be as complete and unambiguous as possible.
This code displays the same behavior as my earlier post (after 10 reports we are unable to create another connection to the DB).
// Initial Form that simply has a button
public partial class SlectReport : form
        public SelectReport()
            InitializeComponent();
        private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
            ReportDocument rd = new ReportDocument();
            ReportForm report = new ReportForm();
            try
                rd.Load(@"Test.rpt");
                report.ReportSource = rd;
                report.Show();
         catch (Exception ex)
              MessageBox.Show(ex.Message);
// The WinForm containing the Crystal Reports Viewer
    public partial class ReportForm : Form
        public ReportForm()
            InitializeComponent();
        private void Form1_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
            this.crystalReportViewer1.RefreshReport();
            this.FormClosed += new FormClosedEventHandler(ReportForm_FormClosed);
        void ReportForm_FormClosed(object sender, FormClosedEventArgs e)
            ReportDocument rd;
            rd = (ReportDocument)crystalReportViewer1.ReportSource;
            rd.Close();
            rd.Dispose();
        public object ReportSource
            set { crystalReportViewer1.ReportSource = value; }
Again, any guidance would be greatly appreciated.

There appears to be a persistent connection limit of 2 for cross domain requests

I am building a service that allows anybody to add real-time push updates to their website or web application. To do this I'm using the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header response from a cloud hosted server.
When establishing a connection we create one persistently connected HTTP connection and use a second connection to send requests (subscriptions/commands).
The problem I'm seeing looks very similar to the old 2 socket to a server connection limit (related to about:config "network.http.max-persistent-connections-per-server").
Is there a limitation on the number of persistent cross domain connections that can be established from a single Firefox process? If so, where is the configuration options to override this?
This problem can be easily duplicated by going to the following page in two tabs within the same Firefox process:
http://kwwika.com/Standalone/Demos/WorldCup2010/
You will notice that one page connects and starts to receive updates. The second will not connect until you close the first tab/page.
I'd like to be able to provide feedback to the users of Kwwika about this problem so any information you can provide me with would be very much appreciated.
== URL of affected sites ==
http://kwwika.com/Standalone/Demos/WorldCup2010/
== User Agent ==
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/533.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/5.0.375.70 Safari/533.4

[bump]

Does NET8 2-tier server have a simultaneous connection limit ?

Does NET8 2-tier server have a simultaneous connection limit ?
I came across one article that has a 100 simultaneous connection listing for 2-tier.
Please let me know
George

Yes, My WRT610N is currently using both 2.4Ghz and 5.0Ghz at the same time. I'm using WPA2 Private with AES on both frequencies. I'm currently getting 135mbps on both frequencies. Both are stable at 30 feet but the Actual throughput is better on the 2.4Ghz frequency and also range.
I think the reason that i'm restricted to 135mbps is the Intel wifi link 5100 can only transfer at a maximum of 150 mbps.
This router has always been stable although i did loose my network one night it dived to 6mbps for apparently no reason at all. But i believe that this issue was due to an update on my Laptop. I fixed this by removing the Wifi adapter drivers and reinstalling them.
5 G Network
Mode:   Wireless-N Only
Network Name (SSID):   N/A
Radio Band:   Wide - 40MHz Channel
Wide Channel:   38
Standard Channel:   36
Security:   WPA2-Personal
SSID Broadcast:   Enabled
2.4 G Network
Mode:   Mixed
Network Name (SSID):   N/A
Radio Band:   Wide - 40MHz Channel
Wide Channel:   8
Standard Channel:   6
Security:   WPA2-Personal
SSID Broadcast:   Enabled
** Note these settings are from the Status / Wireless Network page on the router, all wide channel / standard channels are actually set to Auto

Windows 7 - What Constitutes a Connection Under the 20 Connection Limit?

Background
Currently testing some enterprise software the company I work for designs, and our current scope of support allows for installations on Windows 7. We have multiple services running on the 'server' and we're communicating with clients on various IP ports,
as well as running a webpage through IIS. At the very minimum we have two connections from a client system at any time over two different ports, this can grow depending on what's being run as part of the client.
Environment
The environment consists of the following:
Windows 7 'Server' running a local instance of SQL Express, also hosting ASP.NET webpage.
Windows 7/Vista/XP Clients connecting over IP to 2-4 different ports
Question
There's a host of threads and documentation on the 20 connection limit within Windows 7, but really no clear answer as to what constitutes a 'connection'. Some Microsoft documentation says TCP connections, some say SMB connections, and a half dozen form
posts claim one or the other. I did a quick test last night with a client simulation tool which pushed two connections to the server for each client, and connected 25 clients (total of 50 connections) and was not refused subsequent connections.
What exactly removes an available connection from the pool of 20?
Unlimited connections from a single IP address? (each computer removes an available connection from the limit)
Per TCP connection? (each connection to a port removes an available connection from the limit)
Per Windows User? (each connection from a Windows user removes an available connection from the limit)
Or is the 20 connection limit strictly applied to SMB?
I also see the following in the EULA for Windows 7 Professional:
Device Connections. You may allow up to 20 other devices to access software installed on the licensed computer to use only File Services, Print Services, Internet Information Services and Internet Connection Sharing and Telephony Services.
Does this indicate the 20 connection limit only applies to IIS, ICS, File/Print Sharing?
Greatly appreciate the time taken to answer this.
Cheers,
James.

Hi James,
The 20 connection limit applies to File and Printer sharing.
Limit the Number of Users of a Shared Folder
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc753521.aspx#BKMK_interface
Windows 7 incoming connection limit
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w7itpronetworking/thread/854f3e27-10e5-4629-bb77-007cc5e42b41
Regarding TCP, IIS connection limit, it is hard to confirm. Since Vista SP2 the limitation have been removed from TCPIP.SYS, and has been configured through a registry key. Windows7
should follow that same behavior. You can also consult in IIS forum.
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters\]
Value: TcpNumConnections
Type: DWORD
More information
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/david.wang/archive/2006/04/12/howto-maximize-the-number-of-concurrent-connections-to-iis6.aspx
Best Regards,
Niki
Please remember to click "Mark as Answer" on the post that helps you, and to click "Unmark as Answer" if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

Having internet connection problem with a new Actiontec GT794WG

I am currently using Westell 327w which works completely fine. Its internet light comes on after few seconds the DSL light becomes solid. I am trying to change it to GT794WG, because I have been using 327w about 4 years.
By the way, I am having a connection difficulty with my new GT794WG modem.
Although I connect every necessary cables such as DSL, Ethernet cables and turn it on, an internet light on the modem does not flash. There is no problem with DSL light. It becomes solid after few blinking. Only problem is the internet light. I know that it refers that the modem can not connect with the internet.
I don't understand why the new modem can't connect to the internet which my old modem can?
Can anyone help me solve this problem?

Ok.
#1 For your info, there a certain amount of time that you can re-edit your post.
A time limit of at least 2 hours.
#2 Why do you want to replace your Westell 327w with the newer router? That is if there is any other reason besides, you have been using it for four years..
Moving along...
#3 In the Westell 327w, go to Configuration -> VC Configuration
#4 There are different settings there, as I saw at
https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.westell.com/images/pdf/e90_6000_6100_6110_ug.pdf&embed...
on page 46 out of 146 pages.
#5 What is 0 VPI / 35 VCI set to?
#6 Notes:
a) In the manual/user guide (that docs.google.com URL) the connection type is PPPoE.
b) If 0 VPI / 35 VCI is set to Disabled, what ever the enabled for example 0 VPI / 36 VCI.
If you are the original poster (OP) and your issue is solved, please remember to click the "Solution?" button so that others can more easily find it. If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the "Kudos" button.

ACE connection limit and remote TCP security scans

We are currently running remote TCP security scans on our networks and are running into a major problem where when the scans are taking place the ACE connection resource usage sky rockets and easily reaches the maximum 4 million connections. This means that anyone can run a simple TCP scan and take down our ACE by maxing the connection limit. We have the following parameter-map applied to all of our policies but it does not help to clear the connection count on the ACE in a reasonable amount of time. parameter-map type connection CONNECTION_TIMEOUT set timeout inactivity 300 set tcp timeout half-closed 60 I should note that we do have normalization turned off because it causes way more problems then it's worth (no resolution with TAC). Does anyone have an tips on how to accommodate security scan's on networks behind the ACE while not saturating the connection count limit?

For vips, this particular context only has one class C applied to a class-map. Not all IP's are in use but regardless the ACE creates connections for those as well. I've set the timeout inactivity to 120 seconds and I still see connections from the remote scanning host idling well over 45mins for connections destined to the vip's. Is turning on normalization my only option? I know there are others who have turned off normalization due to performance and connectivity issues so there must be other ways around this. Thanks for your help.

Anywhere16: Connection Limit (Licensed seats) = 3?

We are developing a system with Anywhere16 Developer Edition.
When starting up a DB, we saw that connection limit is restricted at 3.
Is this a limit of Developer Edition? We googled but couldn't find any info about the connection limit of Developer Edition.
We got the license key by registering at this site or so:
SAP - Please Register
If we want to carry out load test later, is there any way to raise the limit?

Hi Henry,
You can use the dblic tool to configure the connection limit to the number of licensed seats that you are entitled to.
For example, to adjust the number of seats to 25, run the following at an elevated command prompt:
"%SQLANY16%\Bin64\dblic.exe" -l perseat -u 25 "%SQLANY16%\Bin64\dbsrv16.lic"
"%SQLANY16%\Bin64\dblic.exe" -l perseat -u 25 "%SQLANY16%\Bin64\dbeng16.lic"
"%SQLANY16%\Bin64\dblic.exe" -l perseat -u 25 "%SQLANY16%\Bin64\mlsrv16.lic"
This document outlines some of the license terms for the Developer Edition. In particular, section 3b describes "test and prototyping use".
You must use this utility only in accordance with your license agreement to license the number of users or processors to which you are entitled. Running this command does not grant you license.
Thanks,
Mikel Rychliski
SAP Active Global Support

WAAS Connection Limit

Hi,
Will the WAE or CM show an error message if the connection limit is reached on a WAE?
Thanks,
Mike

When the WAE/WAVE device reached max connection limit - any new connections will go into pass through due to overload
Existing connections will be still be optimized.
Thanks
Eric
If this answers your questions please mark as answered with a 5.

The TFO accelerator is overloaded (connection limit) and MAPI problems

Hi All!
Problem description:
When MAPI acceleration (exchange/outlook) is Active in our WAAS environment, the remote site users randomly lose connection to the Exchange server (on hub site), if I disable the MAPI acceleration everything works ok. so right now we are running with MAPI accelearation Disabled
I can see that we often get max_conn_reject The TFO accelerator is overloaded (connection limit), we haven't done any adjustments to the default configuration.
The environment is one Hubsite with two remote sites.
[Hub Site] 34mbit
HW=OE674
SW=4.1.5
inline
Enterprise Lic
[Remote Site1] 4 mbit
HW=OE474
SW=4.1.5
inline
Enterprise Lic
[Remote Site2] 4mbit
HW=OE474
SW=4.1.5
inline
Enterprise Lic
So the question is how to solve this?!

I had a feeling that you might have alot of computer remotely.
One of the main factors in sizing a WAAS soluiton is to keep in mind the number of TCP connections that a single WAE can optimize.
We limit the device on optimized TCP connections.After you hit the limit the device will go into the overload state that you mentioned.
274 - 200 connections
474 - 400 connections.
Typically from a sizing a single workstation would be sized from 7-10 TCP connections.
The 2nd factor in sizing is bandwidth - WAAS doesn't limit bandwidth but this is recommended for the CPU throughput.
274 - 2 Megs
474 - 4 Megs
The 3rd factor is redundancy,. HA, etc.
Thanks,
Eric
remember if this answrs your questions, please mark as answered and with a 5.

Exceeding the 40k limit with LocalConnection

Hi, I want to exceed the 40k limit with LocalConnection, but
I don't have the slightest idea, how to do this.
I get a lot of data from a web-connected flex app and want to
bring it to a second flash movie. But I don't even get out, how big
this object is, which I get.
Does anybody has any ideas how to get this working? Is there
a paging mechanism to provide data step by step? Any oder ideas?
Thanks for you help!
Bye,
Fritz

Hi,
I think JavaScript function apex.widget.textareaClob.upload is not documentes.
Have you seen this my blog post?
http://dbswh.webhop.net/htmldb/f?p=BLOG:READ:0::::ARTICLE:2939900346183772
You can download sample application and check code.
Regards,
Jari
My Blog: http://dbswh.webhop.net/htmldb/f?p=BLOG:HOME:0
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/jariolai

How can i connect labview with ge fanuc versamax plc via VISA

I, ve a ge fanuc versamax plc. I am building a data logger in labview. There are two current trasmitters. I dont have any other data acquisition devices other than PLC. How can i access data acquired by PLC and how can i connect it with labview using VISA?

KPAC wrote:
I've a ge fanuc versamax plc. I am building a data logger in labview. There are two current trasmitters. I dont have any other data acquisition devices other than PLC. How can i access data acquired by PLC and how can i connect it with labview using VISA?
There may be variations between models, but I believe all VersaMax support Modbus and GE's own SNP/SNPX serial communication protocols.
For Modbus communication protocol:
The link here is a good outline of the different options available. If you really want to limit yourself to the option of using VISA, then it's Items 1. and 2. in Khalid's list that are applicable. You might have to modify some of the free LabVIEW Modbus VIs to suit you needs, but they are useful as examples if you have little experience programming a serial driver.
For SNP/SNPX:
Your options are similar to those for Modbus, except that I'm not aware of any existing free set of LabVIEW VI's for it. With a web search you might find something (I almost programmed one 10 years ago). The SNP/SNPX protocol is/was well documented in a GE FANUC manual which you could get from them (in 1993 it was GFK-052B "Series 90 PLC Serial Communications User's Manual") so you still can write your own set of VIs.
If you don't really need to limit yourself to using VISA, there are ActiveX and OPC drivers available which use SNP/SNPX that you can find with a web search. And you can see here that NI's Industrial Automation OPC Server's do include an object for GE Fanuc Versamax via Ethernet. This would not be the cheapest in terms of capital cost though.
Good luck.
=====================================================
Fading out. " ... J. Arthur Rank on gong."

TNS-01181: Internal registration connection limit reached

Hi all,
I am currently working on sun solaris box.
My Listener log is showing this error:
TNS-01181: Internal registration connection limit reached
Even database is working fine:-
Only one Perticular application is not able to connect
with OCI error from application .
Plz help ASAP
Regards:-
Deafulter

Hi,
what is the version of the database?
Try to set MAX_REG_CONNECTIONS_<listener>=1000 in listener.ora
e.g.: max_reg_connections_listener = 1000
Hope this helps,
Andrey

Connection limit with ACP7

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for