Costing issues related to material movement

Hi everyone,
My question: If a material (material type being VERP - returnable packing material), has to be transferred from the customer to the returns stock , with Tcode MB1C and movement type 451, will there be any FI/CO issues . If yes how will these affect?
Please throw me some light.
Thanks

hi,
witih 451 mvt, material will be posted to non-valuated customer returns stock and for this you won't have any financial document generated. If you want to take this material in your valuated stock, you will have to do 453 mvt thru transfer posting (MB1B).
- Rahul

Similar Messages

Relation between Material Movement and Material Document

Hi all,
Let me explain my doubt. I'm doing a 501 movement through Migo and through MB1C. Both create material documents, but in different ranges! :O
In Mb1c, uses the 50* range, correct
In Migo, uses the 49* range, not correct.
I can't find where is the material range - Material document relationship is done.
Can you help me?
Regards,
Pedro

Have you seen your posted documents through MIGO and MB1C in MB03.Are you able to see any document type difference once you select header.
Refer below link you will understand the process.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_45b/helpdata/en/f8/6cec6eb435d1118b3f0060b03ca329/frameset.htm
Edited by: Sridhar Jayavarapu on Feb 10, 2010 7:01 PM

Material movement types

dear gurus,
want to know the relation of material movement types with posting

http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/4d/2ba31643ad11d189410000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
The Movement Type Concept
What Is a Movement Type?
When you enter a goods movement in the system, you must enter a movement type to differentiate between the various goods movements. A movement type is a three-digit identification key for a goods movement. The following table contains examples of movement types.
Goods Movements and Movement Types
Goods movement                                                          Movement type
Goods receipt for a purchase order                                101
Goods issue for a cost center                                          201
Release from quality inspection stock                              321
Control Functions of the Movement Type
The movement type has important control functions in Inventory Management.
For example, the movement type plays an important role in
updating of quantity fields
updating of stock and consumption accounts
determining which fields are displayed during entry of a document in the system

Want know a table name in which material movement field exits

hi,
if any know the table name which contains "material movement" field and ("vendor number" or any vendor related field)

Material movements are in tables MSEG and MKPF.
Regards,
Rich Heilman

Update of material movements through MB1A/MB1C in Process/Production Orders

Dear PP Guru,
Can any one help me regarding below issue:
When ever material movement is executed through inventory t-code like MB1A or MB1C, even if order number is used as referance, movement data is not updated neither in component withdrawal data of order not in COOISPI.
Is there any notes need to be applied?
Thanks and regards,

Dear,
Check the material type in OMS2 whether the valuation area(plant) is having the value updation or not.
If you don't have the value updation for the valuation area it will ask for the details of account assignment.
Check Material doc display in MB03.
Check in OMJJ for your mvt type whether the value and qty update is ticked or not...check it in Account grouping tab.
check to MKPF and MSEG table is update the table also.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Relations Between MLCD table and material movements type

Dear all,
I Have a question about relations between MLCD table and Material movements. For Example We have a movement type Z71 when we did a movevent with tis movement type from MB1C Transaction. System creates a record in Mlcd Table. in this table Category field is VN and PCat field is V. How system decides about VN and V
is there any table which contains these conversions or is there any custimization in MM or CO modules ?
Could you please help me if you have any information about subject.
Best Regards

Hi Anupam
Thanks for your speedy reply.sorry i forget to mention i need FG materials details for given plant,production version,metrial type.In
MKAL i am not able to give material type as input parameter
Regards
Bala

When no material movements.

Hi Friends,
I am loading data from one ODS1 to ODS2. In ODS1 I have materilal, plant, calmonth,yr, and total stock is there. While updating total stock into ODS2 , when there no material movements in a particuler month
eg.07.2008 has no movements then for the month 08.2008(for the first day of that period) should get last day of period 06.2008.i.e, that is closing balnce of 06.2008 becomes opening balnce of 08.2008.
I have only material and plant , from this info how can I know no movements for particuler month.
I would like to routine but no idea how to bring that into picture.
As I didnt work in stock scenarios before could you please share your knowledge and any code if you suggest.
Many Thanks for help,
Points will be awarded for the useful suggestions,
Anant.

Hi
Changing the status key every time is very cumbersome.. I prefer to do it like this
1. To Stop Production w/o released cost estimate : I use BADI WORKORDER_UPDATE... It has methods AT SAVE and AT RELEASE.. Write your ABAP code in a way that it reads the Header material of the production order and checks that MBEW-LPLPR is not INITIAL....If it is so, then issue an Error message
Writing this code in AT SAVE wont allow to save the prod order, and writing it AT REL will allow to save, but wont allow to release
2. Once you ensure that prod is not done w/o std cost, all other things fall in place themselves.. however, some prod would have happened by now w/o std cost as you said.. In that case, PGI will happen at zero value...
Also, when you do STO from plant to plant - If the receiver plant has Std Cost = 0, then the entire inventory value goes to NIL
Both these situations can be checked using BADI LE_SHP_DELIVERY_PROC... Write your ABAP code here to check the same... If your Mat Types are specific to Price Control S, better write this logic at Mat Type Level
3. In case you also purchase from outside the Materials which have Price control S, in that case the GR from Purch order may be valued at zero price if Std cost is not released.. In that case use BADI MB_MIGO_BADI
Once you code these BADIs properly, your life becomes easy... there remains no scope for any error and system checks all by itself w/o any manual intervention
Regards
Ajay M

What are the possible cost objects for raw material consumption postings

what are the possible cost objects for raw material consumption postings. i want to know whether it can be work order(maintenance order).

For example, you are confirming a process order and issuing raw materials to the process order, the system in the background creates the consumption posting and will by default use the process order as a cost object.
Similarly, when you are issuing materials to a work order, you will use MB1A and with movement type 261 and the system prompts you to enter the order number. If you are using movement type 201, then the system prompts you to enter the cost center and so on.
Thanks,
Madhav Nanduri

Updating materials issued for production thru movement type

hi
we are using repetitive manufacturing scenario, and we are using back flush, how to find out the materials issued for production thru movement types, from which tables can i get the data
from AUFK i am getting the movement types and the order number, and i am unable to find out material numbers.
the requirement is need to update the costs of the materials based on the movement types for the production

Hi
I dont know if this question falls under the category of "Asking basic questions"
You can use MB51 to get the desired info.. It will give you the Material Consumed + mvt type (261) and Order where the Material is consumed
br, Ajay M

Two different profit center generated after material movement 201

Hi there:
Here is my issue:
After I did movement 201,then I went to mb03 to look at material document, then I click accounting document found that there are two different profit center appeared in two items, first line item is that credit inventory account 20208100, I don't know where does profit center come from in first item? Second item is that debit material consumption 60100000, cost center shows correct which is the one when I populated while doing movement 201, and profit center shows correct, since cost center belongs to it.

Hi Please see my reply as below:
This behaviour seems correct... I think your Profit center in Mat master is different than the Profit center of the cost center to which material was issued
Yes,because profit center in material master is blank in which plant to issue
Inventory account will always be credited with the PC assigned in Mat master
Considering the profit center of mat master is blank, so what default value does it be reflected to inventory account?
Consumption account (If it is created as Cost element) will always be debited with PC of the Cost Center to which material is issued
It was not created as cost element, based on your theory, it will be debited with PC of the material master, but PC of material master of specify plant is blank, so what default value does it be reflected to inventory consumption account?
Consumption account (If it is not created as Cost element) will always be debited with PC of the Material master
Thanks

Hello I don't know who to complain to as you do not appear to have a complaints department, despite searching the web, I trust you can pass this to relevant department for action, as I'm very angry over my recent repair. Following my issue relating to a

Hello
I don't know who to complain to as you do not appear to have a complaints department, despite searching the web, I trust you can pass this to relevant department for action, as I'm very angry over my recent repair.
Following my issue relating to a blank screen 2 weeks ago, your advisor arranged for my iMac to collected by Amsys, for repair and return, this was done and it was returned to me last Tuesday, onWednesday I set up my iMac again and instantly realised I had problems, much worse than before. I called Amsys to inform them of the issue of the computer being very very slow and unable to open iPhoto and pages, and document listing would not show up, plus I had no sound on the mac.They informed me that they had only replaced the video card and what they had done would have not affected the computers performance. He suggested I reinstall OSX again which I did, but this made no difference to the programs, so I called you.
Your technician on the phone was very good as they have always been, and made an appointment for me to go into the Milton Keynes Apple store the next day at 1 pm, which I did.
The gentleman on the Genius Bar was very good and was able to run tests on the iMac in my presence, and diagnosed immediately an issue with the sound problem, and advised me that this could not be fixed while I wait and I would need to leave it for repair. I made him aware of the previous repair, and he was able to see via your system, the list of logged issues I have had with this since purchasing in September 2012. I'm sure you can see from the way you record all calls and issues the problems I have had.
Today I called to ask if my iMac would soon be ready for collection, I was told the repairs had been completed and it was being tested. However to my dismay, I learned of another serious issue relating to the repair carried out by Amsys. I was informed that 6 screws were missing from the the iMac internally, which caused me much distress and concern, they also told me I had to wait even longer as the screws had to be ordered and installed on arrival before I could collect it.
My issues here are: I trusted the Amsys repairer as it was arranged and recommend by you, it is very evident they are not competent to repair, as they have caused more problems with my iMac on its return, despite enclosing a checklist, fully ticked showing everything working well, it clearly wasn't ! Plus the issue of missing parts (screws) during the repair, I have already expressed my disgust with Amsys, by email and had a response, within the hour, apologising and told me they were looking into this.
This where I stand on this, I have not had my iMac for almost two weeks and I do not know when I will get it back. I'm also very worried about what other damage has been caused by Amsys and the quality of my iMac now. I want to know what you, Apple is going to do about this ? I have already been very inconvenienced by this and until now I have been a very loyal apple customer with 2 iPads, and 4 iPhones in our household, not to mention the iMac.
I feel I have been very let down by this experience, on my iMac, which cost a lot of money, I have also lost a lot of money with lost work and unable to carry out my business without it, and I will be seeking compensation.
I trust you will take this complaint seriously and pass it to the relevant department for action.
Yours sincerely
Des Withey
Sent from my iPad
On 26 Feb 2014, at 11:44, Apple Support <[email protected]> wrote:
Thanks for contacting us.
Thanks for contacting Apple Support. If you need more help later, you can open the case below or start a new support request online.
Case ID:
Open this case
Sincerely,
Apple Support
Get help online
Visit Apple Support to learn more about your product, download software updates, and much more.
Join the conversation
Find and share solutions with Apple users around the world.
TM and copyright © 2014 Apple Inc. 1 Infinite Loop, MS 96-DM, Cupertino, CA 95014.
All Rights Reserved / Privacy Policy / Apple Support / Give us feedback
On behalf of Apple Distribution International

Call Apple Customer Relations - 1-800-275-2273. Ask politely & firmly that you want to be transferred to Customer Relations. Tell them exactly what you stated in your post.
GOOD LUCK!
These are user-to-user forums where everyday folk (volunteers) post questions and offer answers (technical support) to each other.

Issue related to the Credit memo and S.O.

Hi,
I have one issue related to the Credit memo and S.O.
We have a network of Dealers and Dealer inventory is linked with our system. When user creates S.O for Dealer1.If the item is not avail in our inventory and it is avail in any other Dealer inventory (Dealer2), then the system creates S.O wrt the Dealer2.
In this case as the material is directly delivered from Dealer1 to Dealer2, there is no any GI in our system.
So, the transaction with Dealer1 will be the normal as usual. But, we have to return the goods amount to the Dealer2 with any suitable way. We are considering it as a Credit memo.
My question is, as we have created S.O wrt the partner function- Dealer1 and we are creating CR memo for Delaer2, is there any way through which we can link the se two transactions with customizing so that we need not to make any ABAP programming.
I mean can we create Cr memo wrt S.O when the partner functions are different?
Pl. guide me.
Thanks,
Roopan.

You have an interesting Scenario.
You can handle this scenario in multiple ways
1. Third party Scenario (Here Dealer 1 becomes Vendor &Dealer 2 remains Customer)
2. Order related sales & credit memo.
3. Intercompany sales, where you represent dealers place as a plant in your system. (Not an ideal way to handle the scenario, but possible option)
Regards,
Rajesh Banka
Reward points if helpful.

Special MTO Scenario - Costing Issues

Hi,
Not sure if I should post it here or in the FI / CO forum, but here it is ...
I'm in the process of implementing APO in a Aerospace company in Montréal, Canada and we're stuck on an Account Assignment Planning, and Product Costing issue.
Today, all demand / production / movements / costing is done by creating a Project Network.
Here are the current settings:
- Create a project with activities for each major "line section" for major components.
- Each activity has a component allocated to it
- Each activity has a different WBS element assigned to it.
- All production orders/purchase orders/goods movements are created/posted against the WBS elements.
- All stock for MTO parts are assigned to the WBS element
In order to provide better integration with APO and bring more flexibility in the Planning and Simulation processes, we were hoping to stop using Project Networks as the trigger for demand / planning / execution. The idea was to use Sales Orders (or Customer Independent Requirements - CIR) to generate the demand and run APO and MRP planning from it. The special stock segment now becomes linked to the sales order (or CIR) which changes alot of thing in the accounting documents and costs elements in the whole planning and execution processes.
Here is what we were hoping to achieve in order to limit impacts on finance :
- we are implementing APO and would like planning to be performed without using project networks.
- we would like to have planned orders for the top level for long term and be able to trigger the purchasing of long lead time items.
- we would like all goods movements (PO reception, GI to production order etc, ) to be posted to WBS elements
- we would like all production orders to settle to WBS elements
We tried different scenarios with different account assignments categories, but could not find one that fits the bill :
1) we tried using account assignment category "D" which allows assignment to sales order and WBS element. We created CIR as demand.
The problem is the stock is non-valuated which resulted in having no accounting documents for goods issue to production order.
2) we tried account assignment category "Q" with using CIR as demand. We had one WBS element assignment in the CIR. When we changed the WBS value in planned orders to represent each "line section" we ended up with duplicate demand in the original segment and the new segment.
So, is there a scenario with valuated stock that would allow us to do a make-to-order process that would post all costs to WBS?
Thanks,
Marc

Hi, sorry for the title confusion ... I cannot change it anymore.
I'm not sure I understand what you are proposing.
In our case, the problem is not really linked to the CIFing to APO but more on the Account Assignment Category in ECC and the Customer / Project Stock Segment in MRP.
Since we have a multiple level BOM and that the intermediate levels need to be associate with different WBS element according to major parts of the aircraft.
Here is an example :
Aicraft -- Has its own BOM with major parts as sub assemblies,
Major Parts -- Each Major Parts needs to be linked to a different WBS for costing purpose.
Minor Sub Assemblies -- All cost of producing the Minor Sub Assemblies should be tracked inside the Major Parts WBS.
Components -- All components costs and accounting documents should be tracked inside the Major Parts WBS.
We know that by using a project Network for the Aircraft Level we could create activities for each Major Parts with different WBS, but since we want to do planning in APO, we were hoping to not use PS has a scheduling basis. The integration of PS in APO is still not used a lot and the flexibility of Projects in planning processes is not great.
In resume, we are trying to create the demand from a Sales Order or CIR, but manage costs and accounting documents within WBS for all level in order to limit impacts on the Finance Department.

Issue related to the Excise Postings

Issue related to the Excise Postings
My Scenario is i have an Purchase Order with Excise Duty of 16.48%
For Eg: Net Price(1000) + Excise Duty (16.48%) = Rs.1164.8
my vendor gives me a Modvat of 10% i.e Rs.104.8
but i have to pay him the total amount (i.e with excise)=Rs.1164.8
How to do the GR with Excise & Invoice Verification??
Wat amount will be Credited to vendor???
How to do Excise Posting for this Scenario???
Thanx & Regards,
Kumar Rayudu
Message was edited by:
Kumar Rayudu

Hiii Ramakrishna,,
User doesnt know at the Time of Purchase Order that how much excise & Modvat will be getting. Only the Gross value is given in the Purchase order including all
taxes ( No Tax Code in the Purchase Order).
Excise Invoice and Vendor's Bill are received when the Materials are received.
They will get the Modavat according to the Excise Invoice of the Manufacturer
Now while doing GR i manually give the Excise BED & Cess given in the Manufacturer Excise Invoice.
Post the Excise Invoice before doing MIRO.
The Problem is in the MIRO Transaction.
At the MIRO i have selected the Tax Code with Excise.
System is caluclating the the Excise on the PO Value i.e more than the value in the Vendor Excise Invoice (Part 1 & Part 2) and the Liablity of vendor is increased and the difference amount is posted to the material.
Everything is going fine except the Vendor's liability and it should be value of the Purchase Order.
How the system is caluclating the Value ???
am i doing any wrong procedure???
Explain me???
Thanx & Regards.
Kumar Rayudu

Amount not turning up for material movement type : 601 from 2lis_03_bf

Hi all,
i have loaded the inventory cube from 2lis_03_bx the quantity is turning up for movement type 601 but the amount is not getting reflected it is always blank.
   If   ( SOURCE_FIELDS-BWVORG EQ '000'         "Other Issues
   OR    SOURCE_FIELDS-BWVORG EQ '101'        "Returns / Vendor
   OR   SOURCE_FIELDS-BWVORG EQ '104'         "Material Transfer
   OR SOURCE_FIELDS-BWVORG EQ '105'          "Stock Adjustment InvD
   OR   SOURCE_FIELDS-BWVORG EQ '106'         "Stock Ajdustment Other
   OR SOURCE_FIELDS-BWVORG EQ '110' )
   "Issues from stock transfer
   AND SOURCE_FIELDS-BWAPPLNM EQ 'MM'
only movements which are relevant for stock control
   AND SOURCE_FIELDS-BWBREL EQ '1'
   AND SOURCE_FIELDS-BWGEO <> 0
SEE OSS NOTE 630254
   AND ( SOURCE_FIELDS-BSTTYP IS INITIAL OR
               ( SOURCE_FIELDS-BSTTYP CA 'EQ' AND
                  SOURCE_FIELDS-KZBWS CA 'AM' ) ).
*IF THE RETURNCODE IS NOTE EQUAL ZERO, THE RESULT WILL NOT BE UPDATED
     RESULT = SOURCE_FIELDS-BWGEO.
and i can see for other movement type like 641 the amount is turning up.
Can anyone advise me on this
thanks

does the material movement type : 601 will be updated from this data source : 2lis_03_bx nor it is from 2lis_03_um??
Can anyone advise me on this!!
thanks

Costing issues related to material movement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for