Could not allocate space for object temporary system object: ... in database 'tempdb' because the 'PRIMARY' filegroup is full.

Using SQL Server 2008 R2. Tempdb resides on disks W and X
both of those are 250 GB each. Nothing else resides on these disks. The recovery mode for tempdb is set to Simple and is split in 8 files and one log file. Each of the tempdb file is set for auto growth by 128 MB and max size is unlimited. The log file is
set for auto growth by 10% and max size unlimited.
I get the following error at least once a week while running an ETL:
[SQLSTATE 01003] (Message 8153) Could not allocate space for object '<temporary system object: 335532118192937>' in database 'tempdb' because the 'PRIMARY' filegroup is full. Create disk space by deleting unneeded files, dropping objects in the filegroup,
adding additional files to the filegroup, or setting autogrowth on for existing files in the filegroup. [SQLSTATE 42000] (Error 50000). The step failed.
I have to then shrink the tempdb log and files to create space on the disks.
What is a permanent solution to this problem, I don't want my ETL to break due to TempDB diskspace full.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Permanent solution would be finding out query which is causing tempdb log file to grow out of proportion and fill it and I would like you to take help of below article
Troubleshooting out of space issue in Tempdb
Please change Autogrowth value for Log file from 10 % to may be 100 M. This is just a tentative value you need to study
growth of tempdb to reach to correct value. You kept 128 MB autogrowth for tempdb data file is this value tentative or you just put it.
Below article can be referred for tempdb details
Working with tempdb
Please mark this reply as answer if it solved your issue or vote as helpful if it helped so that other forum members can benefit from it.
My TechNet Wiki Articles

Similar Messages

Java 1.4.1 - Could not reserve space for object heap - need help

I know this problem has been posted before, but I thought this was fixed in release 1.3. I'm using Windows XP/Professional and do the following:
C:java -Xmx2g
Error occured during initialization of VM
Could not reserve space for object heap
C:java -version
java version "1.4.1_02"My computer system has 1 GB of RAM and a 2 GB pagefile, expandable to 3.5 GB. I can get going with -verbose:gc -Xmx1600m -Xms200m, but the GC only gets to about 1 GB before I get an out of memory exception, not even close to 1.6 GB as specified.
I'd really appreciate it if anyone can shed some light on this behavior.
Cheers, Eric

Hmm.
I tried a mini no-operation application with jdk1.3.1 on Linux. It run okay like this:
$ java -Xmx1934M u
$ echo $?
0
$ java -version
java version "1.3.1_07"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.1_07-b02)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.3.1_07-b02, mixed mode)
$ cat u.java
class u {
public static void main(String a[]) {
$This however fails miserably:
$ java -Xmx1935M u
Unexpected Signal : 11 occurred at PC=0x401a0cb7
Function name=start_thread__2osP6Thread
Library=/usr/lib/jdk1.3.1_07/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so
Current Java thread:
Dynamic libraries:
08048000-0804c000 r-xp 00000000 03:08 174723     /usr/lib/jdk1.3.1_07/bin/i386/native_threads/java
0804c000-0804d000 rw-p 00003000 03:08 174723     /usr/lib/jdk1.3.1_07/bin/i386/native_threads/java
40000000-40012000 r-xp 00000000 03:08 20686      /lib/ld-2.2.5.so
40012000-40013000 rw-p 00011000 03:08 20686      /lib/ld-2.2.5.so
...This looks familiar:
$ java -Xmx2000m u
Error occurred during initialization of VM
Could not reserve enough space for object heap

The merge process could not allocate memory for an operation; your system may be running low on virtual memory. Restart the Merge Agent.

I encountered this problem on our SQL2012 and I have tried different scenarios (see below) to no avail. I have decided to give up and check if someone here has encountered this and resolved it.
One thing I know, it's not a memory issue. Both servers we're using has lots of memory to spare and we monitor the memory as the replication goes through it's steps.
I hope someone can help me on this. Thanks!
The Error:
The merge process could not allocate memory for an operation; your system may be running low on virtual memory. Restart the Merge Agent.
Our Scenario
We're using SQL Server 2012 SP1. All subscriptions are pull based.
We're using direct Merge Replication (not FTP or web sync)
We already have 10 active replications with larger databases. Only 1 has this issue.
Database size is less than 5 GB
Rebuilding the publisher is not an option.
What have I tried?
There is no memory problem --- we have lots to spare
I have tried re-initialization of the database. Same problem.
I tried deleting the database and reinitializing it. Same problem
New snapshot. Same problem.
I tried changing the subscriber server but still same issue.
MCP, MCSD, MCDBA (ANXA)

Here is the result for the sp_configure on our subscriber. We're doing a pull on the server with the issue.
name
minimum
maximum
config_value
run_value
max server memory (MB)
128
2147483647
2147483647
2147483647
In addition, I made a comparison between the working servers and the one with the issue -- there seems to be a difference in the service pack. Publisher has none but the subscriber is operating on SP1. But still strange as only 1 database is affected.
MCP, MCSD, MCDBA (ANXA)

CMN_1117 ERROR: Could not allocate space in file

Hi All,
I am getting below Error while doing an ETL full load (Informatica 901) on the task DATAWAREHOUSE.DATAWAREHOUSE.SILOS.SIL_APTransactionFact_DiffManLoad.
My source system is EBS R12 and Target is OBI Datawarehouse (7.9.6.3)
LKPDP_1:TRANSF_1_1> CMN_1117 ERROR: Could not allocate space in file [BI/infohome/server/infa_shared/Cache/PMLKUP16145_7_0_6139S64.dat].
Below is the file system specification of my server.
Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on
/dev/dsk/c0d1s0 837G 639G 190G 78% /BI
I could also see that my 'Cache' folder from '/BI/infohome/server/infa_shared/' is increasing upto 190 GB and throwing an error. Is this normal that the data cache to increase up to 190 GB for a EBS source system which has only 500 GB data in total. And i am doing only load for Financial Analytics.
Many Thanks

We are struck on same issue. I didnt any update on this thread if the issue was resolved.
I checked out "SIL_APTransactionFact_DiffManLoad" workflow in Workflow manager and unchecked "Lookup Cache() function".
However, I still see the cache files created on <<INFA_HOME>>/9.0.1/server/infa_shared/Cache folder.
Since it was set not to use cache, can it be possible not to have these files cache files generated.
Appreciate your time and help.
Thanks, Vagic.

APEX SSO and Load balancing: Could not determine workspace for application

We had a single HTTP Server serving APEX in a 10.2.0.2 database configured with SSO to be used by the developers. APEX has been registered as a partner application and the login url has been CA Siteminder protected so that the SM_USER details are forwarded in the header for the application to use for authorization. Everything is fine so far.
Now we have added a HTTP Server on another host and have it all set up for APEX and its pointing to the same database. APEX_ADMIN access works as normal, but applications previously using SSO now get the following error after entering the URL.
Expecting p_company or wwv_flow_company cookie to contain security group id of application owner.
Error ERR-7620 Could not determine workspace for application ().
Using HTTP Watch I find that the application is not even trying to redirect to the login page.
What is wrong here?

APEX has been registered as a partner application as described in
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/database/application_express/howtos/sso_partner_app.html
In the meantime I found metalink document 368746.1 which describes the cause of this problem. Please read carefully what I wrote, it all works when the the new APEX web server is turned off in the server farm on the load balancer and directed through the original web server. When running regapp.sql the hostname in the listener token was using the virtual hostname. This works fine if the request comes from the original APEX server which proofs that there is nothing wrong with the installation and set up of SSO. When directing the request to the new APEX web server the APEX_ADMIN page still works only existing work spaces using SSO don't seems to work anymore resulting in a error as described in the subject.
As for metalink document 368746.1 naming the causes of this error:
- there are no duplicate entries in WWSEC_ENABLER_CONFIG_INFO$
-LISTENER_TOKEN clearly works for requests coming from the first web server
-theoretically the web server listener port could be changed from 7777, but port 80 needs to be maintained here as production is mimiced as far down as possible.
Is there some cache table which can be cleared? How is it that the flows schema (apex engine) can not find the work space when the request comes from a new web server which can however access the APEX_ADMIN pages.
anyone?

Could not determine BW release of logical system 'BWPCLNT100

after a BI systemcopy (production to development) we get the following
error when we run load jobs of type "delta load". full loads work fine
"Could not determine BW release of logical system 'BWPCLNT100'"
even if i start the deltaload from the R/3 system with transaction RSA3
with update mode "C" i get the same error . when i use update mode "F"
it works fine , but that's not the thing we want.
BWPCLNT100 is the logical system of the productive system .
we have changed all the logical system setting to BWDCLNT100 using
transaction BDLS and we have also changed all entries in RSBASIDOC,
RSISOSMAP, RSOSFIELDMAP,.... .
we have done several systemcopies in the past , they all worked fine
and without this error. this is the first copy in BI 7.00 .
are there any loadmodules which have to be regenerated with the new logical system name?
thank you for your help and kind regards hannes toefferl

Hi,
As you said you are getting error after system copy when you are doing the delta load and full load is working fine for you.
This mainly happens due to init disturbance in the source system.
I would suggest you to delete the init and rerun the Init from BW once again.
This should solve your problem.
Thanks
Mayank

Error in ALE service 29 Could not determine recipients for message type MAT

Hi Experts,
While transferring the material using ALE am getting error 29 ie 'Error in ALE service' and message is 'Could not determine recipients for message type MATFET'.
Also i ve recieved the materials with the proper status al the end am getting the above error.
Kindly help me out.
Thanks in advance.

Hi ,
Status 29 means " partner profile not found " . Please check if the recieving partner is configured properly in WE20 in sender system.
Also make sure that the Port and RFC definations are also completed. If the IDoc is manually triggered then please make sure that control record parameters of the idoc are properly filled - if we miss the details ( like wrong port given , wrong basic type for message type - or extended message type ) then also the idoc will fail in status 29 even though the partner profile is properly configured .
Since your idoc is getting generated i think no issues with BD64 since already interested recipeints were populated in control record of idoc.
Regards
Vikas Chaudhary

Configuration could not be found for instance 000000000237355515

Hi MM Gurus
I have a PO with two line items and for 01 line item at the item level Material data tab,,when clicking on the "Configuration Tab" system is throwing the Error Message as "Configuration could not be found for instance 000000000237355515" Can any one suggests me what the Problem is and where the configuration data is maintained.
Thanks in Advance
Ganesh Kumar

Hi,
Did you solve this problem ? we are gettign this problem now, I am not sure how to solve this ?
Pls share us if you have already solved this ?
Thanks
Gayathri

Adobe Air Aplication descriptor could not be found for this application

Can You Please help me it s so importan i downloaded program and it required adobe air i downloaded it then it says aplication descriptor could not be found for this application

I have the same problem,I downloaded program
And it required adobe air, then I downloaded adobe air but then when I tried again to open that program I get an error message says application descriptor could not be found for this application. Try re-installing or contacting the publisher for assistance
would you please help me.

Could not allocate new page for database 'TEMPDB'

Dear All,
When I try to fill up the aggregate of a cube, the job is cancelled after 16484 Seconds due to runtime error .
I couldnt do fillup though I tried lot of times. The system log information is given below.
Database error 1101 at EXE
Could not allocate new page for database 'TEMPDB'. There are no more pages available in filegroup DEFAULT. Space can be created by dropping objects, adding additional files, or allowing file growth
Database error 1101 at EXE
Perform rollback
Run-time error "UNCAUGHT_EXCEPTION" occurred
Short dump "080101 025044 Eapsapp1 POTARU91" generated
Transaction Canceled 00 671 ( UNCAUGHT_EXCEPTION 20080101025044Eapsapp10021 POTARU91 0011 )
Perform rollback
System Details:
BW Version : 3.5
Support Level: 19
Datebase : MS SQL Server 2000
Cube's E Table Details:
Total Rows : 318,230,953
Data Szie(KB) : 121,358,760
Index(KB) : 55,241,264
Min. Row Size: 371
Max Row Size: 393
TEMPDB database information:
DB Size(MB): 139,999
Size Used(MB): 3
Free (MB): 139,996
Log Size(MB): 342
Log Used(MB): 117
TEMPDB is having 9 Database files. Out of nine, three database file information is given below.
Logical File Name: tempdev
File Size(MB): 20,000
Used Space(MB): 0
File Size Limit(MB): 20000
File Growth Step: 250MB
Free on Disk(MB): 459,204
Logical File Name: tempdb_1_Data
File Size(MB): 14,999
Used Space(MB): 0
File Size Limit(MB): 15000
File Growth Step: 550MB
Free on Disk(MB): 2,674
Logical File Name: tempdb_2_Data
File Size(MB): 15,000
Used Space(MB): 0
File Size Limit(MB): 15000
File Growth Step: 0MB
Free on Disk(MB): 2,674
Collectively for all the 9 database file size is 140GB.
Please let me know what has to be changed in above TEMPDB size settings to avoid the issue in future.
Advanced Thanks for your solution for this issue.
Regards
Guna.

Hello,
as the message stated correctly is the tempdb full:
Logical File Name: tempdev
File Size(MB): 20,000
File Size Limit(MB): 20000
Logical File Name: tempdb_1_Data
File Size(MB): 14,999
File Size Limit(MB): 15000
Logical File Name: tempdb_2_Data
File Size(MB): 15,000
File Size Limit(MB): 15000
All files of the tempdb are restricted in size and already expanded to their maximum size. You now can either
- add another file on a disk with free space and let the file grow
- let the existing files grow to an higher amount
Best regards
Clas

RFC destination Could not be SPecified for Logical System

Hello there
i am traying to costomize Transaction Luancher for some of the report which is been devloped in ECC (wich is ARD 100)
when on Transaction launcher Wizard--> techincal
i am having a logical system as ARD100(my r.3 system where report is devloped and which is connected to CRM )
while chosing the OBJ.TYpe :   and Method:
it says shows three erroe :
1) RFC destination could not be specified for the logical system ARD100
2) Object type and Method is not available
i have checked RFC , in SM59 entriesu2026u2026 There is an RFC named ARD100 and the connection test works. I also did an authorization test and it also works. I also checked to make sure the logical system name ARD100 exists
could you please help me to resolved the same
Regards
Rajiv

Hi Rajeev,
In a system landscape it's important and necessary to use the logical system names consistently throughout all systems!
Therefore please make sure, that you always use the same name for a logical system in all systems (CRM and R/3 systems).
The following steps are required before a RFC call is made from the CRM system to the R/3 system :
    o Use transaction SM59 to create an RFC destinations for the remote
       system.
    o Use transaction BD54 to create the logical system.
    o Use transaction BD97 to link the RFC destination created in SM59
       with the logical system created in BD54.
I hope this helps.
Best Regards
Gavin

Account 'Cost elem. for settlmt AuC to CO objects' could not be found for a

Hi All,
we are facing one error massage at the time of settlment KO88.
Account 'Cost elem. for settlmt AuC to CO objects' could not be found for area 01
Message no. AU133
Diagnosis
When creating the accounting document, the system could not find account 'Cost elem. for settlmt AuC to CO objects' in depreciation area 01 for company code CSEB.
Procedure
Enter this account in the account determination for Asset Accounting.
Thanks & Regards,
juhi

Hi Juhi...
Please check the below procedure....
If you are using the Internal order process, then
KO01 - IO Creation
ME21N - PO creation with IO as Account assignement
MIGO
MIRO
1. IO to AUC Settlement
Define the Settlement Rule iin IO - KO02   (AUC Asset)
KO88
Settlement type is "Automatic"
For Cost analysis....you can refer to KOB1   or    KO03 -> EXtras -> Cost Analysis
2. AUC to Fixed Asset or Cost Center
KO02 - Settlement Rule - Cost center   or   Fixed Asset
KO88
"Full Settlement"
If the process is
AIAB and AIBU
Refer to
AW01N
Hope it gives some idea
Thanks

Could not create JCOClientConnection for logical System:

Hi,
I am facing a wierd problem in using the JCO destinations.
I created a page where it is using some JCO destinations say SAP_R3_HumanResources.
when i open the page it is working for the first time .without closing the page if i open the same page again it is giving the following error
Error connecting using JCO.Client: null
Error connecting using JCO.Client: null
Pernr:Could not create JCOClientConnection for logical System: SAP_R3_HumanResources - Model: class com.swissre.CustomData. Please assure that you have configured the RFC connections and/or logical system name properly for this model!
Please let me know how to solve this issue
Thanks
Bala Duvvuri

Hi Bala,
It seems that this is a custom webdynpro application which when executed causes such problem. This might be due to JCO connection not released back to the pool.
Please refer to the following threads and that might be helpful.
Re: JCO Connection close
How to close a model object connection for Adaptive RFC?
You might have to call disconnectIfAlive method on your model.
Regards,
Jigar

Error "codepage could not be determined for the receiver-system"

Hi,
we use the idoc-adapter to send message from mySAP ERP to PI.
All worked fine.
So, this morning I have changed the datatype of the messageId from "char" to "int" in mySAP ERP in the customizing menue (install param). So, no message received in SAP PI.
When I start transction "we05" in mySAPERP" I get the following error:
"codepage could not be determined for the receiver-system" status 02.
I have changed the datatyp to "char" but the same probleme
Can anybody help me please?
Regards
Stefan

This error shouldn't occur unless there is some modification at the OS level codepages.
Please check the entried in the RFC destination for connecting to the XI system. Unicode settings.
Regards,
Prateek

An RFC destination could not be specified for the logical system

Hello Experts,
I am trying post goods receipt in EWM system in a simple inbound delivery process. It is not getting posted back in ECC. I have my RFC connection setup properly(I assume since I was able to transfer inbound delivery to EWM in first place).It seems some setting related to Outbound queue in EWM is missing.Can anyone tell me in detail what settings are required?Is it something to do with WE20 transaction?I am not sure what settings should be done there.The error log is as below-
An RFC destination could not be specified for the logical system
SB3CLNT011
Message No. B1550
Diagnosis
An RFC destination should be specified for the logical system SB3CLNT011.
This could not be done in this case. SB3CLNT011 is not your local logical system
and this system is not included in the relevant Customizing tables.
Procedure
Check:
RFC
destination
Port
definitions
oubound partner profile of
message type SYNCH for this logical system
Regards,
Khushboo

Hi Oritra and Suraj,
I have checked remote connection in SM59 for both the logical system.It works fine.I understand this is more of a technical issue,but I don't have A local basis team to help me so reaching out to experts here.Can you guide me what technical settings could be checked for EWM-->ECC connection?When I execute BD82 for SB3CLNT011 it shows me green status with message "No messages have been defined for the selection conditions in the model".
Although when I do this for EWM logical system SB3CLNT012 it shows me this with all green status-
System SB3CLNT011 as a partner type already exists
System SB3CLNT012 as a partner type already exists
Port A000000018 with RFC destination SB3CLNT011 already exists
Outbound parameters for message type SHP_IBDLV_CHANGE SHP_IBDLV_CHANGE01 already
Outbound parameters for message type SHP_IBDLV_SAVE_REPLICA SHP_IBDLV_SAVE_REPLI
Outbound parameters for message type SYNCH SYNCHRON already exist
Am I missing something in WE20?
Regards,
Khushboo

Could not allocate space for object temporary system object: ... in database 'tempdb' because the 'PRIMARY' filegroup is full.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for