CSCus68798 - ISE is vulnerable to CVE-2015-0235 Linux Ghost remote code execution

First time trying to follow a specific CVE in Real-Time...
I see this CVE-2015-0235 GHOST hack is applicable to ISE and Prime Infrastructure... but I haven't seen any patch status update since yesterday.
CSA says "Obtaining Fixed Software
Cisco has released free software updates that address the vulnerability described in this advisory."
Yet, when I check the (2) products' download pages, the newest software I see is from Jan 23 and Jan 6, respectively. The exploit was published on Jan 27. So, where are the patches?

The team that found the exploit, Qualys Security Advisory, documented that "the most stable and long-term-support distributions were left exposed (and still are): Debian 7 (wheezy), Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 & 7, CentOS 6 & 7, Ubuntu 12.04, for example."  See the link below for the full report:
https://www.qualys.com/research/security-advisories/GHOST-CVE-2015-0235.txt
I'm assuming this is affecting all versions of UC appliances running these OS's (and possibly more that aren't used in the example?).  Anyone know how to determine what products are vulnerable to this?

Similar Messages

  • Is AsyncOS vulnerable to New Critical GLibc Vulnerability CVE-2015-0235 (aka Ghost)

    Raising for awareness in the community.
    New Critical GLibc Vulnerability CVE-2015-0235 (aka GHOST)
    https://isc.sans.edu/diary/New+Critical+GLibc+Vulnerability+CVE-2015-0235+%28aka+GHOST%29/19237
    Raised a support case and current update is Cicso is investigating if AsynOS is vulnerable
    Paul

    Currently it is being reviewed and looked into:
    http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=37181
    Please refer to the following information, as provided from our Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT):
    Complete information about reporting security vulnerabilities in Cisco products, obtaining assistance with security incidents, and registering to receive security information from Cisco is available on Cisco.com at:
    http://www.cisco.com/web/about/security/psirt/security_vulnerability_policy.html 
    This web page includes instructions for press inquiries regarding Cisco Security Advisories. All Cisco Security Advisories are available at:
    http://www.cisco.com/go/psirt

  • Vulnerability in VBScript Scripting Engine Could Allow Remote Code Execution (3016711)

    Can some one help me to download below Security patches which i am not able to download from MS Web site?
    Vulnerability in VBScript Scripting Engine Could Allow Remote Code Execution (3016711)
    Vulnerability in VBScript Scripting Engine Could Allow Remote Code Execution (3016711)

    Microsoft Releases KB3024777 Update to Fix Botched KB3004394 Patch
    http://news.softpedia.com/news/Microsoft-Releases-KB3024777-Update-to-Fix-Botched-KB3004394-Patch-46...
    Windows 7 Pro SP1 (64-bit), avast! V7 Free, MBAM Pro, Windows Firewall, EMET, OpenDNS Family Shield, IE9 & Firefox (both using WOT & KeyScrambler), MVPS HOSTS file, SpywareBlaster, WinPatrol PLUS, SAS (on-demand scanner), Secunia PSI.
    [I am experimenting with Sandboxie, and believe computer-users who sandbox are acting prudently.]

  • CSCus68905 - Evaluation of CVE-2015-0235 and39;GHOST

    Is it now definitive that Prime Infrastructure 2.1 and earlier are not affected by this?

    The vulnerability was updated after some back and forth..  All versions are affected.

  • CVE-2015-0235

    Hi guys,
    Does anybody know if Solaris SUNWGlib is vulnerable to GHOST (CVE-2015-0235) ? Or it's just the Linux version of glibc?
    Thank you!

    The official statement from Oracle with regard to GHOST at this time is:
    Oracle’s security and development teams are aware of the recently disclosed vulnerability, CVE-2015-0235; or ‘Ghost’.
    Oracle has provided information about this issue for Linux.
    The URL for the information published is http://linux.oracle.com/cve/CVE-2015-0235.html.
    Please note that Solaris does not ship glibc.  Other products like Solaris Cluster, Oracle Key Manager and
    ZFSSA that have Solaris as the base or embedded operating system do not contain glibc either.
    Regards,
    Alan Hargreaves

  • GHOST Security Vulnerability - CVE 2015-0235

    Dear All,
    I have 2 units of Xserve running on Maverick OS 10.9.5
    Is the Maverick OS 10.9.5 vulnerable to GHOST CVE 2015-0235 threat?
    If yes where can I download the patches?
    Please advise
    Thanks
    Izzychunwei

    No known threat to Macs at present, but will have to wait for confirmation from Apple.
    Have a read here https://jamfnation.jamfsoftware.com/discussion.html?id=13156
    Cheers
    Pete

  • CSCus68892 - N7K assess GHOST vulnerability in glibc and40;CVE-2015-0235)

    The affected releases listed for this advisory state "Known Affected Releases: (4) 4.2(8), 5.2(9), 6.1(5), 6.2(10)"
    Our 7Ks are running 6.1(2), does this mean that any code in the 6.1(x) release below 6.1(5) is affected? Or is it just 6.1(5) specifically and none other running 6.1(x)?
    Thanks,
    Jim

    Hi,
    Please refer this links,
    Linux GHOST vulnerability (CVE-2015-0235) is not as scary as it looks | Symantec Connect
    https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0090.html
    Regards,
    S27

  • CSCus68892 - N7K assess GHOST vulnerability in glibc and40;CVE-2015-0235) - 1

    Wouldn't it be a workaround to disable name resolution by configuring:
    no ip domain-lookup

    Hi,
    Please refer this links,
    Linux GHOST vulnerability (CVE-2015-0235) is not as scary as it looks | Symantec Connect
    https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0090.html
    Regards,
    S27

  • Glibc GHOST vulnerability # CVE-2015-0235.

    Please suggest patch for glibc GHOST vulnerability # CVE-2015-0235 in Oracle Linux server.Please find below details:-
    ./ghost
    Linux JBLDCVSNPRE01 2.6.39-400.214.6.el6uek.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu May 8 03:38:30 PDT 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
    Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.5 (Santiago)
    Installed glibc version(s)
    - glibc-2.12-1.132.el6_5.1.x86_64: vulnerable

    Hi,
    Please refer this links,
    Linux GHOST vulnerability (CVE-2015-0235) is not as scary as it looks | Symantec Connect
    https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0090.html
    Regards,
    S27

  • Re: glibc GHOST vulnerability # CVE-2015-0235.

    Hi,
    I tried hijacking someone else's forum thread for my own issue, but a kind forum moderator branched it away to (hopefully) stand on its own merits instead of ripping attention away from that original discussion.
    We have an Oracle Appliance ( OVCA ), I am trying to find patch policy of Oracle for the OVCA and OVM environments.
    I read Doc 1965975.1 on MOS but this is explicit for Exalogic.
    So I am not sure if I should install this patch on this appliances.
    Is anyone familiar with Oracle's patch policy regarding OVCA/OVM.
    Thanks in advance,
    Regards,
    Eelke.

    Oracle VM 2.2,  3.2 and 3.3 have all been patched for GHOST: linux.oracle.com | CVE-2015-0235.
    I will look into why 3.3 is listed, but I've checked the repository and the updated glibc RPMs are available. However, I'm not sure what OVCA's patching policy is, so you'd need to open an SR for that.

  • CVE-2015-0235 on Oracle Database Appliances

    Hello,
    Does anybody know if Oracle Linux Server release 5.9 2.6.39 400.126.1.el5uek is vulnerable to GHOST (CVE-2015-0235)?
    Thank you!
    EPA

    You would need to check the version of the glibc RPMs on that box and make sure they are up-to-date. The RPMs with the fix applied are listed here: linux.oracle.com | ELSA-2015-0090 - glibc security update

  • Looking for info on CVE-2015-0235

    Hello,
    I'm looking for information on CVE--2015-0235 or GNC C Library (glibc) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability.
    I would like to see if the affected program is on my servers and if so is Solaris 10 effected?
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks

    We don't ship glibc with Solaris

  • GHOST - CVE-2015-0235

    Hi All,
    Does anyone know the applicability/exploitability of this on CUCM/VCS and CTS endpoints? Is it possible to remotely execute code on any of them unauthenticated for example? I would like to understand the actual impact, and the canned response on each of the product specific bug pages makes it difficult to do this.
    "The impact of this vulnerability varies based on hardware and software configurations. A remote, unauthenticated attacker who is able to provide a hostname to an application that is using an affected function may be able to exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive information from memory or perform remote code execution with the same privileges as the process or application being exploited."
    Jason

    You might be more interested in the Cisco Blog on this threat located here: http://blogs.cisco.com/talos/ghost-glibc
    The most important part being in the Conclusion: The most likely outcome in a real-world scenario would be a segmentation fault, not code execution.
    Wayne
    Please remember to rate responses and to mark your question as answered if appropriate.

  • Threat Feed say my ipad2 got threats, memory corruption vulnerability exist, which could lead to remote code execution. How to solve this problem?

    Threat Feed (McAfee) say my ipad2 got threats, memory corruption vulnerability exist,
    which could lead to remote code execution. How to solve this problem?

    You can't solve this problem yourself. You would need to wait for apple to release a "fix" or for McAfee to revise their judgement.
    If you're worried about the threats, don't do things that would expose yourself to the vulnerability that they describe.
    Since I can't see what you're looking at, I can't give you any other advice.

  • False positive for 16800: TCP: GNU Bash Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

    Dear Team, 
    in my customer, one of banking in brunei want to access several finance website such as www.iifm.net etc. Tipping point IPS blokec to access the website with report as a 16800: TCP: GNU Bash Remote Code Execution Vulnerability ( Low Severity). The site is normal and legal website. Our question is the several website is needed to access by our employee due to the dailiy working. Please advice 
    Best Regards
    Yudi

    @yuibagan 
    ‎Thank you for using HP Support Forum. I have brought your issue to the appropriate team within HP. They will likely request information from you in order to look up your case details or product serial number. Please look for a private message from an identified HP contact. Additionally, keep in mind not to publicly post ( serial numbers and case details).
    If you are unfamiliar with the Forum's private messaging please click here to learn more.
    Thank you,
    Omar
    I Work for HP

Maybe you are looking for