CU50- Channges to the bom by the user will be ignored

Hi, while testing in CU50, After entering the config values, the above message "changes to the bom by the user will be ignored'. how to eliminate the message?

Hi,
In case u have action or procedure dependecies, which are causing a change in the Bom item qtys which were originally defined in Super BOM and are now changing through config values, u will get a message as u said.
As it is a message during simulation process, u can ignore this.
Regards
Venugopal

Similar Messages

Is it Possible in Purchase Order that putting the BOM, all the components ?

Is it Possible in Purchase Order that putting the BOM, all the components of that particular ges populated in the Rowt ? This is necessary to select single - single items is PO..
We are also using MRP and Forecast. We want to use this method in case of placing URGENT Purchase Order without considering WH stock + PO ordered + ....................
What kind of Query we would write , that putting the BOM in the UDF, the componenets get populated in Purchase Order...
Please give complete query.................

The query I have provided earlier needs to be set in the ItemCode field at the row level and not on your User field at the header.
The query below (same as earlier with the addition of the user field name - please verify) will show the Child Items of the BOM item who code you have entered at the Header level in your UDF.
SELECT T0.Code FROM [dbo\].[ITT1\] T0 WHERE T0.Father = $\[OPOR.U_BOMNAME]
This will not automatically fire but the user has to first enter the Vendor Code and then enter the U_BOMName and then in the Item code field press Shift+F2 which will fire the above query FMS displaying the child Items for this BOM.
Suda

Purchase order form display the BOM of the item material

Dear :
When i print or preview the purchase order in ME23n,I want to display all of the components of material which every item used.(sap standard output type is NEU,form is MEDRUCK)
The components can be displayed when we click the button of "Components" in the right "Material Data" ITem Tcode:ME23N.
Firstly ,i have to get the BOM of the material through the function:CS_BOM_EXPL_MAT_V2.But NOW,i found that ,In ME22N ,the operator would change the components and saved the order,
   so, my way to display the component in the print form is wrong!:(
   anyone give me some advice?
   Thanks.

Shao,
I guess you will have to design your SMART Form according to your requirments and configure this SMART Form to be called from the output conditions of the PO.
In this SMART Form, you will have to include the logic of exploding the BOM and showing the components as well.
I don't its a standard functionality.
Regards,
Ravi
Note : Please reward the helpful posts.

Component in the BOM whit the for decimal .

Dear gurus,
i need insert in the quantity of component in the BOM the value 1,1234 , a value whit for decimal but the system for the UM ( example KG) is 3 decimal in the transaction CUNI .
Are there the procedure for insert this value ?
Thanks a lot
Daniele Pistilli
PP

Hi,
SAP Standard will allow u only 3 decimal palces.
So do one thing increase the base quantity of header material so it can fullfill you're requirement..
EX: in bom you have given like for one FERT material you want RAW material 1.1234..normal in this sap std will allow only up to
1.123 only...
For this in the BOM of FERT material header data PUT base Quantity 100 so that you can put youre RAW material Quantity as
112.23.
Regards,
Ravi

How to see the BOM or the comsumption From one PRO. order

hi,friends,
i want to see what kind of the material and what quantity of material from one production order, how to do by TO? if these informations can be known, the warehouse should do the delivery conveiently.if you know how to do,would you please tell me ?
tks and best regards!

Hi MG,
What do you want exactly?
Generally, when a PrdOrd is released a TR will be generated. You can see this in LB10 - and processing this TR from LB10 a TO will be created and warehouse workers can move the goods to production area.
You can check the content of this TR by clicking on it in LB10 or you can use LB03+TR no. as well.
If your production order release doesn't trigger a TR but you use LP10 to create TR for pick part.
You can also disply your PrdOrd in CO03 and choose menu > Goto > WM pick list. Or you can also use
the 'Components' icon.
If you want to get information of consumption concerning a particular PrdOrd please use MB51 (you can use the PrdOrd field as filter criteria within the report) or CO03 (> menu > Goto > Documented goods movements).
Please clarify your question.
BR
Csaba

To stop delivery if one of the BOM items not available. -- how?

I have BOM items
Item Description
10         abc
20         def
30         xyz
Items 10 and 20 are available in a particular date but item 30 is not available. Then save the document.
user does not know items are available or not then they will go VL01N.
There are empty deliveries with out items also but they are saving delivery.
Now they want stop in delivery if there is no items available, the system should not save the document
This is my requirement.
Please let me if you have any queries.Kindly help in this regard by suggesting suitable ideas.
Regards,
Anbu

I have a requirement regarding BOM items.
Client requirement is such a way that they have so many BOM items.
Example:
10 monitor
20 CPU
30 key board
When every it deliver these like this they so so many BOM items they use so document types different item categories.
At that time 10and 20 are available 30 is not available. Just they save the document. They will order number another user.
Based on the order number another user will create Delivery it is main 30 item is not available Empties in deliveries (reason is its group delivery.)
But they are able to save the document now they want if in deliveries no item system should not allow save the document.
please through some light on what basis we can stop saving the delivery document
Regards,
Anbu

It did not insert the materials in the BOM using 'CSAP_MAT_BOM_MAINTAIN'

Hi!
We developed a ABAP technical maintenance BOM.
In the program.
Before, we got current BOM and eliminated all related items.
Routine below.
     LOOP AT INTO it_stpo wa_stpo.
       MOVE-CORRESPONDING TO wa_stpo wa_stpo_i.
       wa_stpo_i-id_itm_ctg = wa_stpo-item_categ.
       wa_stpo_i-id_item_no = wa_stpo-item_no.
       wa_stpo_i-id_comp = wa_stpo-component.
       wa_stpo_i-fldelete = 'X'.
       APPEND TO wa_stpo_i it_stpo_i.
     ENDLOOP.
     CALL FUNCTION 'CSAP_MAT_BOM_MAINTAIN'
       EXPORTING
         Stuff = pv_matnr
         plant = p_werks
         bom_usage = p_tplis
         Alternative = p_altlis
         VALID_FROM = v_valid_from
         i_stko = pv_wa_stko
        TABLES
          t_stpo = it_stpo_i.
After , we inserted new materials in the BOM using the same function .
routine below
   LOOP AT INTO it_tab_i wa_tab_i ins_up_del WHERE = '1 ' OR
                                           ins_up_del = '2 ' .
        wa_stpo_i - item_categ = ' L' .
        wa_stpo_i -component = wa_tab_i - matnr_pri .
        v_menge_i = wa_tab_i - menge ( 9 ) .
        v_menge = v_menge_i / 1000 .
        WRITE TO v_menge wa_stpo_i - comp_qty .
        wa_stpo_i - comp_unit = " KG " .
        wa_stpo_i - issue_loc = " COS " .
        APPEND TO wa_stpo_i it_stpo_i .
      ENDLOOP .
* Including new materials in the BOM .
      CALL FUNCTION ' CSAP_MAT_BOM_MAINTAIN '
        EXPORTING
          Stuff = pv_matnr
          plant = p_werks
          bom_usage = p_tplis
          Alternative = p_altlis
          VALID_FROM = v_valid_from
          i_stko = pv_wa_stko
        IMPORTING
          fl_warning = v_fl_warning
        TABLES
          t_stpo = it_stpo_i
        EXCEPTIONS
          error = 1
          OTHERS = 2 .
But the new materials were not inserted.
Could you help me what is missing in the routine ?
Thanks.

Hi!
We found the problem.
The problem was in the fields ID_ITM_CTG, ID_ITEM_NO and ID_COMP.
They were not cleaned when we were inserting the new materials in the BOM.

A additional column is appearing in the bom display transaction

Dear Expert,
I am facing a unique situation .Recently my system has gone through EHP 5 upgradation.When i am displaying the production bom for a particular material in your Quality client , i can view a additional column in the GENERAL ITEM OVERVIEW and the name of this column is Function ID, but when iam viewing the bom of the same material in your production client , i cannot see this column. I tried , but could not understand the reason for this discrepancy. Please help me in finding out the root cause of this discrepancy.
Thanks & Regards
Hritesh
Edited by: hritesh on Jan 12, 2012 7:26 AM

Hi,
Check below setings..
Extream right side top corner of CS02 (General Item Overview) - There will be table view ( Configuration) --> Click on that --> in the next window - Table Setings --> click on administrator (you should have authorizations to perform this function)..
Check whether the "Function ID" is maintained as Invisible in your Productive System.
Best Regards,
Siva

Issues while processing the BOMs using fm ''CSAP_MAT_BOM_MAINTAIN'

Hi Group,
we are facing issues while processing the BOMs using the basic type(Z-idoc type) for standard type BOMMAT04.
thing is that the segment 'E1STPOM' is defined to contain 1 to 99999 records in it.
when an Idoc is run(say with 150/200 segments of 'E1STPOM'), there was a standard error with error message id PIC01(number : 004) when the Idoc is processed with the Standard function module 'CSAP_MAT_BOM_MAINTAIN'.
the error says 'Error reading material FING_005 . Exception: 0' and Check whether the material number is blocked. but when checked, the Material seems not blocked.
kindly advise how to overcome this error and proceed further.
Regards,
Vishnu

Checj the material status, while its transfer from one server to another server the status should be different

Translation - XLF file with the UTF-8 BOM at the head of the file

Using APEX 3.2, I'm trying to get translations loaded for an application that I'm working on. We are going through the process of generating XLIFF files, sending them to a translator to translate, and then importing the data back in rather than manually editing the translations.
This works perfectly when I use my text editor to enter the (very poor) translations in the file. Our translator, however, uses a tool that adds a byte-order mask BOM at the head of the XLIFF file when it saves it in order to identify it as a UTF-8 encoded file. This appears to be a valid way for the tool to indicate the encoding being used though, obviously, the encoding in the header overrides it and the BOM is not the preferred method of specifying the encoding of an XML file. However, when we import the file in APEX, and hit the Apply XLIFF button, we get an error
ORA-31011: XML parsing failed ORA-19202: Error occurred in XML processing LPX-00210: expected '<' instead of '¿' Error at line 1
The third byte of the UTF-8 BOM (0xEF,0xBB,0xBF), if interpreted as an ISO-8859-1, would be the upside down question mark character in the error message. So it appears that the APEX importer is interpreting the BOM using the ISO-8859-1 character set and throwing an error that the file is not valid. That is not my reading of the proper XML parser behavior.
Obviously, we can work around the problem either by asking our translator to use a different tool or by opening up the files we get back in a hex editor and removing the BOM. Is there anything we can do to resolve the issue that doesn't involve adding an additional manual step to the process or the translator changing the tool being used? Or is there something I'm missing that would indicate that a file with the BOM in the first three bytes should not be considered a valid XML file?
Justin

Hello Justine,
>> Are you stating that that APEX translation engine more or less requires the database character set to be AL32UTF8 in order to work properly …
Not exactly.
The APEX translation engine uses the XML DB parser, and this one needs a legal XML file. The problem is that in your specific case, the encoding of the XLIFF file doesn’t match the database character set, hence a character set conversion process is involved in the middle. This conversion process – from UTF-8 to WE8MSWIN1252 embeds illegal XML characters in your stored XML file, right where the BOM is. If, for example, your XLIFF file were encoded in Windows-1252, no character conversion would be necessary and the final (database stored) version of the XLIFF would have been remained legal (assuming it started this way). In this case, the APEX translation mechanism will work just fine, even with a database character set of WE8MSWIN1252 (as you can see when you are using your own XLIFF files, which don’t include the (offending) BOM byte).
>> … even if an alternate character set encodes all the characters we need?
With your current database configuration, it seems that the alternate character set you are talking about can’t really encode all the characters that you need, as it can’t cope with the UTF-8 BOM conversion. It very well may be the only character it can’t handle, but that is enough.
As we need to be practical, and a database character set conversion is most likely out of the question, the simple solution is probably asking your translator to save your XLIFF files without including the BOM. I’m not familiar with the professional XLIFF editors you mentioned, however, as UTF-8 encoding doesn’t really need a BOM, saving a UTF-8 file without it should be an option (just like Keith mentioned with regards to very simple editors like the windows’ Notepad, or Notepad++).
Regards,
Arie.
&diams; Please remember to mark appropriate posts as correct/helpful. For the long run, it will benefit us all.
&diams; Author of Oracle Application Express 3.2 – The Essentials and More

The BOM alternative 1,2

Hi,
We have created one BOM (alternative 1) with date (valid from10.01.2008) and 2 Months later we kept the same BOM and created (alternative 2) with date (valid from 10.03.2008). We will always (re)create the same BOM with new alternative every 2 Months.
Now we want to display the BOM (from the last valid from date) only when we give a date and not a alternative number (because in one year we will not remenber the alternative number.)
How can I customize the System so that it shows the right BOM through the date (valid from or the last valid from date). for exp. if I give 10.03.2008>Display only BOM(alternativ 2) and 17.03.2008>Display only BOM(alternativ 2) because it is the last valid from date
Thanks

Dear Dede,
Kindly read this and revert back what more you need.
1.When you create a BOM for a material (First Alternative) as on today using an ECN,then in the header of the BOM,the valid from
date will be 28.03.2008 & valid To Date will be 31.12.9999.
2.For its BOM components the valid from date will be 28.03.2008 & valid To Date will be 31.12.9999.
3.If create a Change that's valid from tomorrow(29.03.2008),and using this if i'm changing the First Alternative BOM's components say
i'm deleting one component and saving the datas.
4.If i go in display mode of the BOM removing the valid from & To date in the input screen,then for the deleted item or component,the
valid from date will be 28.03.2008 & valid to date will be 29.03.2008.But in the header of the BOm,there wont be any change,the valid
from date will be 28.03.2008 & valid to date will be 31.12.9999.
5.Now if I decide to delete the entire BOM(alternative 01) on 05.04.2008,then i create an ECN that's valid from 05.04.2008,and using
this,I go in Change mode and then from the top menu,BOm Material --->Delete,and save.
6.Now go in display mode of the BOM and check in the header of the BOM,there now you can see the valid from date will be
28.03.2008 & valid to date will be 05.04.2008.
So this valid to date of the BOM header will be changed,only if the entire BOM is deleted.
I hope the above explanation will clear all your doubts.
Reward points if satisfied with the answer and close this thread.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Are you aware of: The assault on our users continues. It might be worth the squeeze to alert your Firefox users to this scam. Brian Fake Anti-Virus Poses As Microsoft Update Jayesh Limaye, Jun 10, 2011 1656 hrs IST

It can be seen of late, that fake anti-virus attacks have become more professional, and can actually convince more innocent people than ever before, to fall into this trap. In this case, a huge amount of attention has been paid to copy the graphics and website elements of the original site to fool people into believing that the bogus site is in fact, the original. They have also taken advantage of the timing of the monthly update patch released by Microsoft, known as Patch Tuesday, to get more users into installing this malicious software.
Graham Cluley, Senior Technology Consultant at Sophos, said, "Users need to be more vigilant than ever before as bogus security alerts pop-up in their browsers. Fake anti-virus attacks are big business for cybercriminals and they are investing time and effort into making them as convincing as possible. Malicious hackers are using smart social engineering tricks more and more often, and the risk is that users will be scared by a phony warning into handing over money to fix problems that never existed in the first place".
The next time you see Microsoft update notification while using Firefox, steer clear of this wolf in sheep's clothing.

You are welcome. I'm glad you got it back up.
(1) You say you did the symbolic link. I will assume this is set correctly; it's very important that it is.
(2) I don't know what you mean by "Been feeding the [email protected] for several weeks now, 700 emails each day at least." After the initial training period, SpamAssassin doesn't learn from mail it has already processed correctly. At this point, you only need to teach SpamAssassin when it is wrong. [email protected] should only be getting spam that is being passed as clean. Likewise, [email protected] should only be getting legitimate mail that is being flagged as junk. You are redirecting mail to both [email protected] and [email protected] ... right? SpamAssassin needs both.
(3) Next, as I said before, you need to implement those "Frontline spam defense for Mac OS X Server." Once you have that done and issue "postfix reload" you can look at your SMTP log in Server Admin and watch as Postfix blocks one piece of junk mail after another. It's kind of cool.
(4) Add some SARE rules:
Visit http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm and download the following rules:
70sareadult.cf
70saregenlsubj0.cf
70sareheader0.cf
70sarehtml0.cf
70sareobfu0.cf
70sareoem.cf
70sarespoof.cf
70sarestocks.cf
70sareunsub.cf
72sare_redirectpost
Visit http://www.rulesemporium.com/other-rules.htm and download the following rules:
backhair.cf
bogus-virus-warnings.cf
chickenpox.cf
weeds.cf
Copy these rules to /etc/mail/spamassassin/
Then stop and restart mail services.
There are other things you can do, and you'll find differing opinions about such things. In general, I think implementing the "Frontline spam defense for Mac OS X Server" and adding the SARE rules will help a lot. Good luck!

How to know the SID of the particular locked record?

Hi, this is generic question.
please tell me the solution for the below requirment.
One user has locked a record in table ‘EMP’ for UPDATE – transaction/row level lock.. The Emp_ID = 123 is locked.
2nd user also tries to update the same record(emp_id=123) in the table but will not be able to lock it bcoz 1st user has locked it….
Requirement is the 2nd user should get a message indicating who has locked that particular record(emp_id=123)..
V$lock, dba_locks, v$transaction etc., will give all the SIDs that have locks on the table (bcoz many users will be having row level locks on different records on the same table)
but I want only the SID which has locked desired record (emp_ID=123)
Can you give any solution ?

Hema wrote:
Can you give any solution ?
How about addressing and fixing the business process where two different users at the same time need to change the exact same business entity?
Showing the locked session/user does not fix the problem. It is a technical workaround. Technical "solutions" like these does not and cannot address inherent business process conflicts.

How to extract in the ALV output the old data using EXTRACT

Dear Friends,
            I have requiremnt where the user executes the report -
using REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY FM. On the output
i have given an option to user to edit values on the output. So user will edit the values and updating to the data base this
the functionality which we have given to the custom report till now . Now the user came back and asking to provide a SAVE
option on the ALv output so that before updating the total records to the database he can re edit the values which he
has entered previous day . To do this functionality i have read in ALV documentation using the EXTRACT- INCLUDE vex01top.
I have added this but iam not getting exactly how to do this option when the user saves on the ALV output how can he retrive back the saved data on to the output again( i.e on the ouput screen) using the Extract functionality . If any body has done this
do help me . I would like to know should we maintain any custom table for this,for saving the records when user press
save button? .
Thanks & Regards
Madhuri.

> i have read in ALV documentation using the EXTRACT- INCLUDE vex01top.
I don't know where you got that. You have to define your own GUI status (first, copy it from standard status STANDARD_FULLSCREEN of function group SLVC_FULLSCREEN) with your button, and define as follows:
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY'
    EXPORTING
      i_callback_program       = l_repid
      i_callback_pf_status_set = 'SET_PF_STATUS'
      i_callback_user_command = 'USER_COMMAND'
FORM set_pf_status USING rt_extab TYPE slis_t_extab.
SET PF-STATUS 'USER_STATUS' EXCLUDING rt_extab.
ENDFORM.                    "set_pf_status
FORM user_command USING r_ucomm LIKE sy-ucomm
                           rs_selfield TYPE slis_selfield.
IF r_ucomm = 'SAVE'.
ENDIF.
ENDFORM.
> I would like to know should we maintain any custom table
Of course. Create your own custom table. Where else do you want to store data?

Missing items in the IDoc for the delivery

Hi to all,
Sorry if not posting in the right forum.
In my customer's scenario, an IDoc is created against a delivery (via the delivery output), and sent via ALE to a distant warehouse system, for picking and GI posting (basic type SHPMNT03).
For some times, the IDoc created against deliveries including BOMs is missing the main item of the BOM (though the BOM main item is in the delivery).
Consequently, the integration in the distant system is failing, because the higher-level item referenced in the BOM sub-items is missing.
Surprisingly, re-triggering the delivery output does re-generate a complete IDoc, where the segment for the main item is back.
I looked almost everywhere, did many searches in OSS (on SHPMNT03, on HIPOS, on E1ELD24 - segment name in the IDoc -, on "Missing items in the IDoc for the delivery", etc...), I even simply googled the web, but I can't even figure out what is the cause for this (I imagined it could be caused by a missing commit in the program generating the IDoc, but don't know whether this make sense).
Any help would be highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance and best regards
Yan
Edited by: Yan Loiseau on Jul 8, 2010 12:52 PM
Edited by: Yan Loiseau on Jul 8, 2010 12:56 PM

Hello Yan
Jelena is right, you are better off taking it up with SAP. I also did not find any relevant OSS notes.
However the issue, according to my reading, is in the following areas:
1) LV56KF05: INCLUDE LV56KF62 . " FILL_E1EDL24"
This fills the EIEDL24 segment, may be the main item is filled initially and overwritten later.
2) Function Module: IDOC_OUTPUT_DELVRY
You can look at the following OSS notes (though not fully relevant) for some clues:
810981 - Reference data missing in DESADV IDoc from decentralized WMS
537470 - BOM + batch split in decentralized WMS, confirmation fails
752921 - VL563: Higher-level item does not exist
705086 - Higher-level item does not refer to existing item
Hope this helps. Good luck.

CU50- Channges to the bom by the user will be ignored

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for