Currency calculation problem

I have a client who has noticed that when using a different document currency to that of the local currency the values in table TCURR are being ignored.
I thought SAP looked at the values in this table and took the most recent entry against the posting date of the document.
Do you need to run a program so it selects the current one?
Is there some missing config?

hi Mark,
to my best knowledge the process is to determine the exchange rate:
1. if exchange rate is entered by the user, that one is used (warning message could be issued if difference is too big comparing with rate from table TCURR)
2. if no rate but translation date is enetered by the user, than SAP will select the rate from table TCURR acc. to the transalation date
3. if nor rate, neither date is entered, than the process is exactly as you described (recent rate from table TCURR acc. to posting date). However here could be some tricks applied: At many clients in Hungary we implemented a substitution, so the translation date is substituted with the document date (this is because of VAT regulations). I have no idea if this could happen in other countries, but we can never know... Another option is that the document type uses an own exchange rate type (you can check that in tcode OBA7).
hope this helps
ec

Similar Messages

  • What is the best field type for currency calculations?

    Hiya,
    I am doing a load of currency calculations e.g. here's one line of it
    The 'Total' fields I am using for doing/totalling my calculations has been defined as a local variable that reference an amount field setup in the data dictionary as:
    So in my program I am using these 2 decimal field.
    Of course I now realize this is a problem, as lots of rounding occurs and my values are way out when you deal with amounts in the millions.
    Does anyone know what type of variable they think is best for doing currency calculations?
    And could you provide a simple example?
    Many thanks!

    Hello Robert,
    I guess you can go ahead with ATFLV, incase if you want to display as a currency, you can use the function module  KKEK_CONVERT_FLOAT_TO_CURR.
    DATA: c_lv_float TYPE ATFLV VALUE '4.4500000000000000E+02',
          c_lv_curr TYPE WAERS VALUE 'EUR',
          c_lv_currval TYPE NETWR_AP.
    CALL FUNCTION 'KKEK_CONVERT_FLOAT_TO_CURR'
      EXPORTING
        float_imp          = c_lv_float
        curr_imp            = c_lv_curr
    IMPORTING
      CURR_FIELD_EXP      = c_lv_currval
    EXCEPTIONS
      OVERFLOW            = 1
      OTHERS              = 2.
    IF sy-subrc <> 0.
    MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
            WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
    ENDIF.
    WRITE:/ c_lv_currval.
    Output: 445,00
    Regards,
    TP

  • Currency translation problem for calculated key figure

    Hi All
    I have a problem with the currency translation for a calculated key figure.
    I have a requirement to show the MM consignment stock value in the specified currency from the selection screen.
    For consignment stock, there is no value maintained in the system. So for this we need to calculate the value as below
    Restricted key figure: RKFConsignment stock: Total stock with special stock indicator restriction "K"
    Calculated keyfigure: Consignment stock value = Nodim( RKFConsignment stock) * (Standard cost / price unit).
    Here, in the calculated keyfigure properties --> I have used a currency translation for the 0CALMONTH.
    The query has selection on the 0calmonth.
    But in the result the I am getting unexpected results.
    Do we have any inconsistencies in the currency translation on the formulas?
    Please help me on this.
    Regards
    S.R

    Hi All
    I have noticed something. I changed my query date selection to Calendar day - Keydate instead of calendar month.
    And I have changed the currency variable to fixed exchange rate "CHF", it is working fine.
    I think I have some problem with the currency translation variable.
    Could anyone of you please send me the currency translation variable for Calendar month with the below parameters
    exch rate  type :  M
    Time reference : 0CALMONTH
                               End of month
    Target currency for a variable : < var created on 0currency>
    For my report,  i need calendar month selection, currency selection.
    Please help me with your ideas.
    Thank you
    Regards
    S.R

  • Currency field calculation problem.

    Dear friends,
    I am trying to calculate one variable that is multiplyied
    by other.
    One is 97.087 that is multiply by dmbtr field.
    Dmbtr field is currency with 2 decimal places.
    Now when i am trying to multiply 97.087 to  dmbtr field.
    System is showing me the error.
    and when i am doing by 97  to  dmbtr field.
    System is showing me no error.
    please help.
    Thanks and Regards
    vivek

    friend,
    this is the code that i am writing.
    wa_output-AMT1  =  wa_output-dmbtr.
    wa_output-AMT11 =  wa_output-AMT1 * ( 97.087 / 100 ) .
    error message is:
    Incomplete arithmetic expression: ")" missing at end of statement.          
    please help.

  • Incorrect Foreign Currency Calculation

    GoodDay,
    Can anyone provide some guidence on the cause of the follwoign problem.
    Local Currency (LC) - TTD
    Foreign Currency (FC) USD
    Money will been taken out of our CItibank Acount creating a credit to the account 10600 Citi NY USD REAL.  On the day the acocunt is credited in Foreign Currency the equivalent in Local Currency  is calucated based on the rate entered on that day in the rate table.
    When the money is  re-entered into the account, in Foreign Currency on another day, the local currency equivalent is  also calcualated based on the rate entered on that day from the rate table.
    The differerence due to the exchange rate is stored in our 50140 Gain on Forex Transaction G/L Account.
    The problem is the calcualtion from the foreign to local currency when the money has returned to the account is incorrect even though the rate is correct in the rate table.
    The exchange rate the day the money came back into the account is 6.34585. However the system appears to have calculated it 63.5485
    Therefore, Foreign Currency Amount  US 85,270,000.00 equates to  Local Currency TT 5,411,106,295.00
    I am of the belief it is a data issue as logically the system cannot choose which calculation to do correclty and which one not to.
    Thanks
    Niketa

    Hi,
    currency conversion always happens based on a exchange rate given for a conversion factor (eg 1 unit 'from' currency is converted to 1 unit 'to' currency).
    Check this conversion factors in t-code OBBS for the exchange rate type + rate you have entered.
    Maybe conversion factor is maintained like TTD to USD is 1:1 whereas USD to TTD is 1:10.
    Best regards, Christian

  • Currency Conversion Problem

    Hi frndz,
    I am facing a problem with the currency conversion.
    In my Report i have used two keyfgures.
    One is directly calculating the values from R/3 side and converting into EURO.
    the other one is calculating through update rule.
    These teo keyfigures should have the same value.
    In this update rule i have used one function module "Convert into foreign currency".
    This function module is calculating the value correct for all other currency only in Korean(KRW)currency i am getting probelm.
    Like R/3 side value converting in EURO in coming as
    507.35
    and through function module value is coming as 50,736.00.
    Please if any one having this problem or any one could suggest some solution then it would be great help.
    I have also tried the solution of deleting the values from SPRO but still the problem is there.
    Thanks in advance

    Revab,
    The admin may delete the record for KRW from TCURX table.
    BUT, it may affect the other applications. It should be carefully considered.
    Though, after deletion end users may check if theirs applications results with regard to KRW have been changed.
    If yes, then the record in TCURX may be added again.
    If not, then it might be a solution. Though, not recommended.
    Best regards,
    Eugene

  • Sum up currency calculated column in a standard list view

    Hi
    How do I total up a currency format calculated column in sharepoint 2010. I am having a problem referring to the articles on the net. Nothing seems to be working. Can I use jquery or something, or can I do it with editing in in the sharepoint designer..please
    assist.

    yes,
    pls try to use jquery in the thread 
    http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/bc037879-f4e0-43a5-a0c1-68cabcae2468/calccalculating-sumon-sharepoint?forum=sharepointcustomizationlegacy
    Please remember to click 'Mark as Answer' on the answer if it helps you

  • Currency Calculations Help Please

    I have been searching for the past 2 days and have not found a usable solution.
    We are working with us currency, or example problem is $1350.50
    Text1 = 1350.50
    Text2 = (Text1*0.25)
    Which is 337.625 but displays with 2 decimal places 337.63
    Text3 = (Text1-Text2)
    Which is 1012.875 but displays with decimal places 1012.88
    of which the total now equals 1350.51
    We are using Acrobat 8 Professional, I am using the text field tool to populate data on the form, and simple calculations for my math.

    Rounding to 2 decimal places makes it only show that the total is 337.63, the actual total is 337.625 which is used in the math calculation.
    I have a form I am trying to ID 10 T proof, they put in one number and the pdf calculates the other 2.  The first calculated amount is 25% of the total amount, the second calculated amount is the difference of the number input and the 25%.
    The currency problem starts with TOTAL $1350.50
    Does that help?

  • Income Tax Calculation problem: Urgent Help Needed

    Dear Gurus,
    I am facing a unique problem. Our client has two incentives –
    1) Product Incentive
    2) Sales Incentive
    Every month incentive figures get changed. These two are Monthly Regular Income (Cumulations Class 24) i.e. included in annual tax calculation.
    Now for tax calculation, my client wants "Actual Earning" and "Estimated Earning for the rest of the year" to be different. But Income tax calculation in SAP (for the month of April 2007) takes Actual Earning and multiplied it by 12( i.e. 11+1) to calculate Estimated Earning. But my client wants this Estimated Earning to be different. 
    Now please let me know is this possible in SAP system and how to calculate this?
    Your help will be highly appreciated
    Waiting for an early reply.
    Thanking You,
    With Best Regards,
    Pratik

    Hi,
    I am not understand your problem give your mb then i talk to you
    mhpo

  • Sale Analysis Profit Calculation problem

    Hello
    I create sale Invoice having Qty 2 unit price 150 & tax code is VAT@4% then Base amount is 300 & Total Bill
    amt is 312.
    My purchase price for the same item is INR 100 so my Gross profit show on Bill is INR 100 & profit percent
    is 33.33%
    Customer will debit with INR 312
    But when Create Rate difference bill ie credit memo of INR 20 per uint ie Qty 2 Tax VAT@4%  (maintain
    drop ship warehouse in row level to can't reduce the qty)
    Customer will debit -41.60
    So Customer Debit balance is 270.40
    But when I run Sale analysis report the result shows that Gross profit INR 260 & Gross Profit % is 100%
    But actually i calculated manually the real Profit is INR 60 & Profit % should be 23.08 should be show in sale
    analysis
    So what i do to see the same result

    Hi
    There is some problem in sales analysis report in some of the sap versions. Refer the following documents.
    [https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/sno/ui_entry/entry.htm?param=69765F6D6F64653D3030312669765F7361706E6F7465735F6E756D6265723D3030303130313637303426]
    [https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/sno/ui_entry/entry.htm?param=69765F6D6F64653D3030312669765F7361706E6F7465735F6E756D6265723D3135383735363826]
    [https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/sno/ui_entry/entry.htm?param=69765F6D6F64653D3030312669765F7361706E6F7465735F6E756D6265723D3136363835363426]
    Regards,
    Sudhir B.

  • Currency(Calculated) field in a BSP Page

    Dear all,
    I have a field "menge" where in i take the user input of material Quantity and another field "netwr" to display value.
    On Initialisation I have written code to take the rate of a material from customizing table and multiply with the quantity and take it into "netwr" as value.
    The problem is that when the value is displayed a space appears after the full decimal
    Eg :
    for Menge = "3.000"
    and Rate = "1.50"
    The Value should have been "4.50"
    BUt it is displayed as "4.50 "
    Please help me in this regard.
    Thanks and regards,
    Arun

    Hi Arun,
    What is the data type of the "newtr".?
    While Displaying the currrecy in BSP we can use the foll syntax.It will format the currency.
    <%=page->to_string( value = <b>itab_bp-bet01</b> format = if_bsp_page~CO_FORMAT_CURRENCY )  %>.
    Rgds,
    Jothi.
    Pl close the thread if you got the soln.

  • Currency format problem while exporting as excel

    Hi
    I have to create a report for which the currency format should be $#,##0.00 and -$#,##0.00 for negative numbers.
    In the text form field of rtf template, I have selected number format and removed the portion ;($#,##0.00) from $#,##0.00;($#,##0.00).When I view the report as HTML the numbers are showing in proper format.($#,##0.00 or -$#,##0.00).But when the report is exported as excel ,the negative number format changes to ($#,##0.00) in red color.
    Can anyone tell me how avoid this problem?
    Thanks in advance
    Naveen

    I think this is an Excel issue - you can right mouse click in Excel the column header and "Format Cells&gt;Text"
    You could also append a ' character to your numbers in BI Answers ie: '6035784010491980 which should give you the correct format in Excel.
    eg. CONCAT( '''', CAST ( '6035784010491980 AS CHAR) )
    There is also an MS Office plug in available for OBIEE this may give you further options.

  • [8i] Date/Time calculation problem...

    So, I am currently facing a situation where I need to calculate the total hours a workstation is in use for each day in a particular time period. I have a table with the log of each time each workstation is used. The problem is, a workstation can be used for any amount of time, starting on any day and ending on any day. This means that a particular entry in the log can span multiple days. I'm not sure how to split the difference between the end date/time of an entry and the start date/time of the entry over multiple days.
    Here's a sample table and some sample data for what I'm trying to do:
    -- Note: in reality, this table contains more columns
    CREATE TABLE     my_hrs
    (     record_id     NUMBER     NOT NULL
    ,     sdatetime     DATE     
    ,     edatetime     DATE     
    ,     workstation     VARCHAR2(4)
         CONSTRAINT my_hrs_pk PRIMARY KEY (record_id)
    -- Note: sdatetime, edatetime, and workstation CAN all be NULL, though I won't provide
    -- any sample data for these situations since I want to ignore them in my results
    -- Additionally, there are hundreds of workstations, but I'm only using 2 to simplify the sample data
    INSERT INTO     my_hrs
    VALUES (12345,TO_DATE('03/01/2010 08:00','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),TO_DATE('03/01/2010 13:35','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),'123A');
    INSERT INTO     my_hrs
    VALUES (13427,TO_DATE('03/01/2010 08:10','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),TO_DATE('03/01/2010 10:02','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),'321B');
    INSERT INTO     my_hrs
    VALUES (21543,TO_DATE('03/01/2010 14:07','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),TO_DATE('03/01/2010 16:30','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),'123A');
    INSERT INTO     my_hrs
    VALUES (22412,TO_DATE('03/01/2010 10:15','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),TO_DATE('03/01/2010 15:30','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),'321B');
    INSERT INTO     my_hrs
    VALUES (11976,TO_DATE('03/01/2010 17:00','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),TO_DATE('03/02/2010 02:30','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),'123A');
    INSERT INTO     my_hrs
    VALUES (34215,TO_DATE('03/01/2010 22:10','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),TO_DATE('03/02/2010 04:30','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),'321B');
    INSERT INTO     my_hrs
    VALUES (24789,TO_DATE('03/02/2010 13:00','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),TO_DATE('03/05/2010 02:30','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),'123A');
    INSERT INTO     my_hrs
    VALUES (31542,TO_DATE('03/02/2010 21:30','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),TO_DATE('03/04/2010 10:30','mm/dd/yyyy HH24:MI'),'321B');Based on my sample data above, these are the results I want to see:
    WORKSTATION     DATE          HRS_IN_USE
    123A          3/1/2010     14.96667
    321B          3/1/2010     8.95000
    123A          3/2/2010     13.50000
    321B          3/2/2010     7.00000
    123A          3/3/2010     24.00000
    321B          3/3/2010     24.00000
    123A          3/4/2010     24.00000
    321B          3/4/2010     10.50000
    123A          3/5/2010     2.50000
    321B          3/5/2010     0.00000Is this possible? (Please note, if the workstation was not used on a particular day, I want it to show 0 hours for that workstation for that day). Another thing to note is that I'm working with Oracle 8i.
    Thanks in advance for the help!

    Thanks, Frank, your explanation helped. My main problem was just that I couldn't picture what that line of the query was doing, even working from the inside out. I learn better through visual and hands-on methods, so to really understand, I had to look at the cross-join of a and h and go line by line. (In case there's anybody who looks at this post in the future and learns like I do, I've posted that data below).
    This definitely solves my problem!
    >
    By the way, this query is full of things that could be done better in later versions of Oracle. Generating table a is just one of them. Starting in Oracle 9, you can do a CONNECT BY query on dual to generate exacly how many rows you need. You never have to worry about an upper bound, and it's much faster than using ROWNUM. From time to time you might gently remind the people who decide these things that you're using a very old, unsupported version of Oracle, and that everyone could be more productive if you upgraded.
    >
    I could go on and on on this topic.... we have tried and continue to try to convince the powers that be to pay for the upgrades... if it were just Oracle that needed to be upgraded, we might actually have a chance at succeeding. As it is, ...ha.
    TABLE A (FROM SUB-QUERY)
    a_date          next_date
    3/1/2010     3/2/2010
    3/2/2010     3/3/2010
    3/3/2010     3/4/2010
    3/4/2010     3/5/2010
    3/5/2010     3/6/2010
    TABLE H (MY_HRS)          
    record_id     sdatetime     edatetime     workstation
    10000          2/28/2010 18:00     3/1/2010 5:30     123A
    12345          3/1/2010 8:00     3/1/2010 13:35     123A
    13427          3/1/2010 8:10     3/1/2010 10:02     321B
    21543          3/1/2010 14:07     3/1/2010 16:30     123A
    22412          3/1/2010 10:15     3/1/2010 15:30     321B
    11976          3/1/2010 17:00     3/2/2010 2:30     123A
    34215          3/1/2010 22:10     3/2/2010 4:30     321B
    24789          3/2/2010 13:00     3/5/2010 2:30     123A
    31542          3/2/2010 21:30     3/4/2010 10:30     321B
    CROSS-JOIN TABLE A WITH TABLE H                                             (and calculations done by the query below)     
    record_id     sdatetime     edatetime     workstation     a_date          next_date     LEAST (h.edatetime, a.next_date)     GREATEST (h.sdatetime, a.a_date)     GREATEST(TO_NUMBER(L-G),0)
    10000          2/28/2010 18:00     3/1/2010 5:30     123A          3/1/2010     3/2/2010     3/1/2010 5:30                    3/1/2010 0:00                    0.229166667
    10000          2/28/2010 18:00     3/1/2010 5:30     123A          3/2/2010     3/3/2010     3/1/2010 5:30                    3/2/2010 0:00                    0.00000
    10000          2/28/2010 18:00     3/1/2010 5:30     123A          3/3/2010     3/4/2010     3/1/2010 5:30                    3/3/2010 0:00                    0.00000
    10000          2/28/2010 18:00     3/1/2010 5:30     123A          3/4/2010     3/5/2010     3/1/2010 5:30                    3/4/2010 0:00                    0.00000
    10000          2/28/2010 18:00     3/1/2010 5:30     123A          3/5/2010     3/6/2010     3/1/2010 5:30                    3/5/2010 0:00                    0.00000
    12345          3/1/2010 8:00     3/1/2010 13:35     123A          3/1/2010     3/2/2010     3/1/2010 13:35                    3/1/2010 8:00                    0.23264
    12345          3/1/2010 8:00     3/1/2010 13:35     123A          3/2/2010     3/3/2010     3/1/2010 13:35                    3/2/2010 0:00                    0.00000
    12345          3/1/2010 8:00     3/1/2010 13:35     123A          3/3/2010     3/4/2010     3/1/2010 13:35                    3/3/2010 0:00                    0.00000
    12345          3/1/2010 8:00     3/1/2010 13:35     123A          3/4/2010     3/5/2010     3/1/2010 13:35                    3/4/2010 0:00                    0.00000
    12345          3/1/2010 8:00     3/1/2010 13:35     123A          3/5/2010     3/6/2010     3/1/2010 13:35                    3/5/2010 0:00                    0.00000
    13427          3/1/2010 8:10     3/1/2010 10:02     321B          3/1/2010     3/2/2010     3/1/2010 10:02                    3/1/2010 8:10                    0.07778
    13427          3/1/2010 8:10     3/1/2010 10:02     321B          3/2/2010     3/3/2010     3/1/2010 10:02                    3/2/2010 0:00                    0.00000
    13427          3/1/2010 8:10     3/1/2010 10:02     321B          3/3/2010     3/4/2010     3/1/2010 10:02                    3/3/2010 0:00                    0.00000
    13427          3/1/2010 8:10     3/1/2010 10:02     321B          3/4/2010     3/5/2010     3/1/2010 10:02                    3/4/2010 0:00                    0.00000
    13427          3/1/2010 8:10     3/1/2010 10:02     321B          3/5/2010     3/6/2010     3/1/2010 10:02                    3/5/2010 0:00                    0.00000
    21543          3/1/2010 14:07     3/1/2010 16:30     123A          3/1/2010     3/2/2010     3/1/2010 16:30                    3/1/2010 14:07                    0.09931
    21543          3/1/2010 14:07     3/1/2010 16:30     123A          3/2/2010     3/3/2010     3/1/2010 16:30                    3/2/2010 0:00                    0.00000
    21543          3/1/2010 14:07     3/1/2010 16:30     123A          3/3/2010     3/4/2010     3/1/2010 16:30                    3/3/2010 0:00                    0.00000
    21543          3/1/2010 14:07     3/1/2010 16:30     123A          3/4/2010     3/5/2010     3/1/2010 16:30                    3/4/2010 0:00                    0.00000
    21543          3/1/2010 14:07     3/1/2010 16:30     123A          3/5/2010     3/6/2010     3/1/2010 16:30                    3/5/2010 0:00                    0.00000
    22412          3/1/2010 10:15     3/1/2010 15:30     321B          3/1/2010     3/2/2010     3/1/2010 15:30                    3/1/2010 10:15                    0.21875
    22412          3/1/2010 10:15     3/1/2010 15:30     321B          3/2/2010     3/3/2010     3/1/2010 15:30                    3/2/2010 0:00                    0.00000
    22412          3/1/2010 10:15     3/1/2010 15:30     321B          3/3/2010     3/4/2010     3/1/2010 15:30                    3/3/2010 0:00                    0.00000
    22412          3/1/2010 10:15     3/1/2010 15:30     321B          3/4/2010     3/5/2010     3/1/2010 15:30                    3/4/2010 0:00                    0.00000
    22412          3/1/2010 10:15     3/1/2010 15:30     321B          3/5/2010     3/6/2010     3/1/2010 15:30                    3/5/2010 0:00                    0.00000
    11976          3/1/2010 17:00     3/2/2010 2:30     123A          3/1/2010     3/2/2010     3/2/2010 0:00                    3/1/2010 17:00                    0.29167
    11976          3/1/2010 17:00     3/2/2010 2:30     123A          3/2/2010     3/3/2010     3/2/2010 2:30                    3/2/2010 0:00                    0.10417
    11976          3/1/2010 17:00     3/2/2010 2:30     123A          3/3/2010     3/4/2010     3/2/2010 2:30                    3/3/2010 0:00                    0.00000
    11976          3/1/2010 17:00     3/2/2010 2:30     123A          3/4/2010     3/5/2010     3/2/2010 2:30                    3/4/2010 0:00                    0.00000
    11976          3/1/2010 17:00     3/2/2010 2:30     123A          3/5/2010     3/6/2010     3/2/2010 2:30                    3/5/2010 0:00                    0.00000
    34215          3/1/2010 22:10     3/2/2010 4:30     321B          3/1/2010     3/2/2010     3/2/2010 0:00                    3/1/2010 22:10                    0.07639
    34215          3/1/2010 22:10     3/2/2010 4:30     321B          3/2/2010     3/3/2010     3/2/2010 4:30                    3/2/2010 0:00                    0.18750
    34215          3/1/2010 22:10     3/2/2010 4:30     321B          3/3/2010     3/4/2010     3/2/2010 4:30                    3/3/2010 0:00                    0.00000
    34215          3/1/2010 22:10     3/2/2010 4:30     321B          3/4/2010     3/5/2010     3/2/2010 4:30                    3/4/2010 0:00                    0.00000
    34215          3/1/2010 22:10     3/2/2010 4:30     321B          3/5/2010     3/6/2010     3/2/2010 4:30                    3/5/2010 0:00                    0.00000
    24789          3/2/2010 13:00     3/5/2010 2:30     123A          3/1/2010     3/2/2010     3/2/2010 0:00                    3/2/2010 13:00                    0.00000
    24789          3/2/2010 13:00     3/5/2010 2:30     123A          3/2/2010     3/3/2010     3/3/2010 0:00                    3/2/2010 13:00                    0.45833
    24789          3/2/2010 13:00     3/5/2010 2:30     123A          3/3/2010     3/4/2010     3/4/2010 0:00                    3/3/2010 0:00                    1.00000
    24789          3/2/2010 13:00     3/5/2010 2:30     123A          3/4/2010     3/5/2010     3/5/2010 0:00                    3/4/2010 0:00                    1.00000
    24789          3/2/2010 13:00     3/5/2010 2:30     123A          3/5/2010     3/6/2010     3/5/2010 2:30                    3/5/2010 0:00                    0.10417
    31542          3/2/2010 21:30     3/4/2010 10:30     321B          3/1/2010     3/2/2010     3/2/2010 0:00                    3/2/2010 21:30                    0.00000
    31542          3/2/2010 21:30     3/4/2010 10:30     321B          3/2/2010     3/3/2010     3/3/2010 0:00                    3/2/2010 21:30                    0.10417
    31542          3/2/2010 21:30     3/4/2010 10:30     321B          3/3/2010     3/4/2010     3/4/2010 0:00                    3/3/2010 0:00                    1.00000
    31542          3/2/2010 21:30     3/4/2010 10:30     321B          3/4/2010     3/5/2010     3/4/2010 10:30                    3/4/2010 0:00                    0.43750
    31542          3/2/2010 21:30     3/4/2010 10:30     321B          3/5/2010     3/6/2010     3/4/2010 10:30                    3/5/2010 0:00                    0.00000
    (Then, the query sums up the last column in the "table" above, grouped by a_date and workstation).

  • Group currency update problem

    Hi FICO gurus
    We have a problem of group currency update.
    We have company code currency GBP and 2nd local currency activated (Group currency) also in GBP.
    Now when we do postings in FI, some of the FI documents are not updating 2nd local currency amount (Group currency).
    Hence while clearing the 2 or more line items in the same GL account we are having a problem of exchange rate fluctuations in group currency.
    Does any one know why some of the documents are not updating group currency?
    Do we need to really maintain OBA1 configuration (exchange rate derivation)?
    Thanks for your reply
    Mr GK

    Does the ECCS ledger include group/ledger currency in the definition (CXL2)?
    Another thing to check is that if the desired GC values are loade in before the translation. If so, the translation method can be changed to "do not translate" for certain items such as the P&L items. This way the values are not changed from the original ledger CAD values as a result of translation.
    Edited by: Dan Sullivan on Nov 16, 2011 8:18 AM

  • Alternative sales commission calculation problem

    hi sir,
    I am a junior consultant trying to solve a problem for my Senior, the question goes as follows:
    We are trying to impute sales commissions to sales rep as a discount for every sale, in which for every sale a determined amount is imputed to the sales rep as a commission.
    the problem arises when the product is returned and customer asks for a refund. Then the commission should be refunded aswell. Could you please throw some light to wether we should clear that invoice the same month or the next one as a negative pendent discount, if so, how is the negative imputation applied?
    thanks a lot in advance,
    HF

    Bobsterslc wrote:
    Here is a screenshot of a piece of what I'm working on.
    Hi Bob,
    Here's what your screenshot looks like when embedded in a post, using the HTML code that Photobucket provides (third item in the list of codes provided).
    In your original post you said:
    I have a table that calculates sales commissions for a number of people and includes an overriding commission for the sales managers. I need to cap the sales commission at a fixed percentage, say 25%, for the sales people.
    I'm not sure what you mean by "I need to cap the sales commission at a fixed percentage."
    The first question that comes to mind is "25% of what?"
    Do you mean that the commission is not to exceed 25% of Total earnings?
    If so, your formula for B5 (the first cell where commission is calculated) would be:
    =MIN(formula1,B2/3)
    Where formula1 is whatever formula is used to calculate the commission when it is less than the cap, and B2 contains the salary/wages which must constitute at least 75% of the total compensation under this interpretation.
    Do you mean the commission rate is on a sliding scale that rises with increased sales, but does not exceed 25%?
    If so, you need to specify the rules that control the rate. Does it rise in steps? Does the 'new' rate at each step apply to total sales, or only to sales above that step? Are the steps the same size for everyone, directly related to the individual goals, or set by some other criteria?
    There's not enough information available fom your table to determine a pattern. For the first three columns, person B's commission is 12% of sales, person C's is under 4% and person D's is 30% of sales.
    For a more detailed response, we'll ned a more detailed specification of the question.
    Regards,
    Barry

Maybe you are looking for

  • Export graphic for use in Premiere Pro Cs4

    Hey everyone, I have made some wiring diagrams in AI CS4 and need to have them apear in a DVD, I have tried several cominations and they are not clear on the video.  My settings are RGB, DV NTSC Widescreen, have exported for Web and Devises and in Ti

  • Mouse Hover text from FrameMaker to PDF

    Hello, I have a Terms list chapter in one of the book. I am trying to create a mouse over a highlighted term in the document to see its definition in the output PDF file. Is it possible for us to perform this operation in FrameMaker? Currently I am u

  • TS3992 Turn off photo library backup in iCloud

    I used to be able to turn off backing up my iPad photo library to iCloud in iOS 7. It's now missing in iOS 8. The only option now is to turn my camera roll on and off. My iPads backup size had gone from 200 MB to 6 GB. Has anyone else noticed this? T

  • EJB3: One-to-Many problems with removing entity from list

    Hi, I have two entities based on tables in HR schema (Departments and Employees). Department has a list of employees. These are the annotations: @Entity public class Departments implements Serializable {     @OneToMany(mappedBy = "departments", casca

  • Inbound Idoc error notification

    I created IDoc interfaces for FI, PO, and GR. As permitted agent, I specified a specific user for testing in partner profile. I want to widen the range of permitted agents, so I created a basic org structure (i.e: CoName->EDI Admin, EDI Support). I'v