Customizing and workbench objects

what are customizing objects and workbench objects?

Changes to cross-client Customizing objects and to Repository objects are recorded in Workbench requests
In workbench request .... it can be programs(repository objects) and cross client data (ie not specific to one client).
Changes to client-specific Customizing objects are recorded in Customizing requests.
Customer customized data designed for a specific client is transported to another client using customizing request. Most of the cases these requests are something like changing values in tables (that too client specific).
Once the Transport request is created it will be "Modified" Status.
Before a request can be transported it should be "Released".
Once the request is released no other changes pertaining to the object saved in the request can be saved to the same request. you have to create a new request for that.
After transporting to the required system, you can check the log of the transport to see if this was transported without errors.

Similar Messages

Creation of customizing and workbench object

Hi!
I am testing now the transport settings for critical objects.
what is the easiest way to create a dummy workbench and customizing object, assign them to transport request and try to transport?
(e.g. Work Bench object: LIMU, DOCU, "Documentation")
Thank you very much!
regards
Thom

Hi,
Goto SE38, create a program and assign it to a development package/dev class automatically it will popup asking for a workbench request, here say create and a request is created.
For documentation, goto se38 type in the progrma name and select Documentation radio button and say change and enter the documentation, it will ask for a request (if the program is already there in a request then it will not ask).
Thanks & Regards,
Navneeth K.

Table for Customizing and BASIS objects

Hi all,
Is there any table/view which stores a list of all customizing and BASIS objects created in the SAP system (something like table TADIR for programs)?
I should be able to query against that table and find if a particular customizing objects exists or not.
Regards,
Saurabh

Hi Saurabh,
here in table SMODILOG...if u fatch data with condition...
where ( OBJ_TYPE = 'CUSO' or
 OBJ_TYPE = 'ACGR' ) and
 OBJ_NAME <> Y*string or
 OBJ_NAME <> z*string.
This will get you the objects that you want.
Reward helpful answers with points,
Regards,
Tejas

Diff between customizing request and workbench request

hai everybody...
i want to know the difference between customizing and workbench request.
and tell me what is customizing request?
and also what is workbench request?
thanks ...
velu.......

Hi,
Workbench Requests
When you change a Repository object of the ABAP Workbench, a query window appears in which you need to specify a Workbench request. You can only save the changes if you have assigned the object to a change request.
Workbench requests and the tasks assigned to them are normally used to record changes to Repository objects and Customizing for all clients. However, you can also include client-specific Customizing.
Whether the changes to Repository objects are transported depends on whether a transport route is defined from the current SAP System for the package of these objects. From the system settings, the system automatically determines whether the change requests are transportable and to which target system they should be transported.
Customizing requests
Customizing requests record client-specific Customizing settings made in a single client (the source client of the request).
Automatic recording of configuration activities in the Customizing work for a client can be activated or deactivated for each client with Client Control. If automatic recording is active, a query window appears when you change Customizing settings, asking you to specify a Customizing request.
Whether Customizing requests are transported or not, does not depend on the objects entered, as is the case with Workbench change requests. The Customizing requests in an SAP System (or in a client if you use Extended Transport Control) are either all transportable or all local, depending on the system setting. The system uses the standard transport layer to determine automatically whether the change requests are transportable and to which target system they should be transported. However, you can change this manually.
Hope this info helps.
Regards,
Kumar.

Is creation of only one transport req(Customizing or WorkBench) possible

Hi,
In Urgent Correction when the correction is set into development the transport request is created. The system creates 2 transport requests: Customizing and workbench. Is there any possible way in which i can determine which sort of transport request gets created (either customizing or workbench). I want that only one type of transport request should be created.
Regards,
Kriti Bhalla.

well I did as I wrote. Just in case anybody needs it, this is how I add new messages that will be processed later by BPEM background job
1. Calling FM BAL_LOG_CREATE
2. Calling FM EMMA_LOG_PROCESS_START
3. Adding messages with FM BAL_LOG_MSG_ADD
4. Calling FM EMMA_LOG_PROCESS_END
5. Calling FM BAL_DB_SAVE (not sure if really needed)
if you need to add messages for different objects within one BPEM Job just repeat points 2 - 5 for each object.
Best Regards
Marcin

Difference between customizing request and workbench request?

Hi ,
What is the difference between customizing request and workbench request?
please reply.........

HI,
Workbench Requests
When you change a Repository object of the ABAP Workbench, a query window appears in which you need to specify a Workbench request. You can only save the changes if you have assigned the object to a change request.
Workbench requests and the tasks assigned to them are normally used to record changes to Repository objects and Customizing for all clients. However, you can also include client-specific Customizing.
Whether the changes to Repository objects are transported depends on whether a transport route is defined from the current SAP System for the package of these objects. From the system settings, the system automatically determines whether the change requests are transportable and to which target system they should be transported.
Customizing requests
Customizing requests record client-specific Customizing settings made in a single client (the source client of the request).
Automatic recording of configuration activities in the Customizing work for a client can be activated or deactivated for each client with Client Control. If automatic recording is active, a query window appears when you change Customizing settings, asking you to specify a Customizing request.
Whether Customizing requests are transported or not, does not depend on the objects entered, as is the case with Workbench change requests. The Customizing requests in an SAP System (or in a client if you use Extended Transport Control) are either all transportable or all local, depending on the system setting. The system uses the standard transport layer to determine automatically whether the change requests are transportable and to which target system they should be transported. However, you can change this manually.
pl reward if it helps.
Thanks
Sadhu Kishore

Authorization Issue with Custom Pending Value Object and Anonymous Users

Hi,
I am just converting my demo from version 7.1 to 7.2. I am not doing upgrade. The demo uses a custom pending value object USER_REQUEST. The idea is that new employee goes to Java AS as anonymous user and enters her details and store where she will work. After submitting request there is an approval process using custom entry type USER_REQUEST. If the request is approved then IdM converts USER_REQUEST into MX_PERSON entry. This works nice in 7.1 but I am having problems with replicating this in 7.2. I created new UI task accessible by anonymous that creates new USER_REQUEST entry. I also assigned role idm.anonymous with UME action idm_anonymous to UME built in group Anonymous users.
My problem is with the field STORE. This field is a reference field to another custom entry type STORE (this entry type will be used in context based assignment). Every new employee must selects a store where she will work. The problem is when user clicks on button "Select". Web dynpro terminates and returns authorization error. I also tested this with entry type MX_ROLE. I added attribute MXREF_MX_ROLE and same issue. So it seems that just assigning UME action idm_anonymous is not enough to list objects from identity store. I found a workaround for this issue. When I assign also UME action idm_authenticated to Anonymous users then it does not dump and I get a pop up window where I can search for store. It does not seem right to assign idm_authenticated to anonymous users.
Another issue is with display task for entry type USER_REQUEST. I assigned a display task to entry STORE and I set that Anonymous have access to this task in Access control tab. I assigned default value to the field store. So when a user opens page she can see a hyper link to display already assigned store. When user clicks on this hyper link it opens a new pop up window and user must authenticate against Java AS. After successful authentication the display task for entry STORE is displayed. I would assume that anonymous user can display it without authentication.
So to me it seems like authorization checks have been changed in 7.2 versions and are more strict for anonymous tasks. Hence my question is how can I implement my scenario. Am I missing some configuration or what's the proper solution to my two issues? I don't count assigning idm_authenticated to Anonymous users as a solution. This workaround does not solve my second issue.
Thanks

Some of the folks from Trondheim labs check, but rather infrequently. There's another person who I guess is in consulting that also checks from time to time.
Sorry I can't help you with your main question...
Matt

Customizing request & Workbench request

Dear all,
What is the differance between Customizing Request & workbench request?

Hi,
Workbench Requests
When you change a Repository object of the ABAP Workbench, a query window appears in which you need to specify a Workbench request. You can only save the changes if you have assigned the object to a change request.
Workbench requests and the tasks assigned to them are normally used to record changes to Repository objects and Customizing for all clients. However, you can also include client-specific Customizing.
Whether the changes to Repository objects are transported depends on whether a transport route is defined from the current SAP System for the package of these objects. From the system settings, the system automatically determines whether the change requests are transportable and to which target system they should be transported.
Workbench requests record changes made to ABAP Workbench objects.
There are local and transportable Workbench requests. (Local Workbench requests have the target system <space>.)
The package of the object and the transport route settings in the Transport Management System determine whether changes are recorded in a local or a transportable Workbench request.
Customizing requests
Customizing requests record client-specific Customizing settings made in a single client (the source client of the request).
Automatic recording of configuration activities in the Customizing work for a client can be activated or deactivated for each client with Client Control. If automatic recording is active, a query window appears when you change Customizing settings, asking you to specify a Customizing request.
Whether Customizing requests are transported or not, does not depend on the objects entered, as is the case with Workbench change requests. The Customizing requests in an SAP System (or in a client if you use Extended Transport Control) are either all transportable or all local, depending on the system setting. The system uses the standard transport layer to determine automatically whether the change requests are transportable and to which target system they should be transported. However, you can change this manually.
Changes to Customizing settings are recorded in Customizing requests.
When you release the requests, the current status of the recorded settings is exported, and can then be imported into the consolidation system and, if necessary, into subsequent delivery systems.
The client settings determine whether
o changes to the Customizing settings are possible
o the changes are recorded
When you create Customizing requests, the transport target is automatically assigned the standard transport layer by the R/3 System.
Regards,
Satish

I am planning to create custom defined DSO Object & Info cube

Hi ,
                 i am planning to create custom defined DSO Object & Info cube.what ratio i can calculate what is the keyfields & what are the data fields in DSO.How can i calculate.
                 2. how can i create suitable dimensions, suitable characterstics for dimensions.what ratio i can decide.
Thanks,
chandu.

Hi Diego Garu,
                           Thanks for your fast response.i
VBELN     VBAP     2LIS_11_VAITM                                              0DOC_NUMBER
POSNR     VBAP     2LIS_11_VAITM                                                0S_ORD_ITEM
KUNNR     VBAK     2LIS_11_VAHDR                                                 0SOLD_TO
VBELN     VBRP     2LIS_13_VDITM                                                    0BILL_NUM
FKDAT     VBRK     2LIS_13_VDHDR                                                 0BILL_DATE
INCO1     VBRK     2LIS_13_VDHDR(INCO1FieldNot Available in Data Source)     0INCOTERMS
ZTERM     VBRK     2LIS_13_VDHDR(Payment terms field Not Available in Data Source)                                                                                0UCPYTERMS
NETWR     VBRP     2LIS_13_VDITM                                                           0NETVAL_INV.
                                       here data is coming from the multible tables.that why i am planning to create custom defined data source based on view. here how can i calucate dso is suitable or cube is suitable.
suppose dso is suitable how can i decide which on is the data field and which one is the key field.
                                    how can i decide how many dimensions are needed here.and which chara are suitable for that dimensions.
Thanks ,
chandu.

How to set change mode as default for workbench objects

Hi experts
I've always wondered if there is a configuration option in NW BW 7 where it can be set whether double clicking a workbench object will show the maintenance screen for that object in change or display mode (default is display). Because is annoying to have to set edit mode every time one double click a workbench object in the development system, and as it is a development system, it would make sense to have edit mode by default instead of display
I was thinking that it may be related to the client role, but who knows...
I appreciate your help
regards

Not sure where this can be set...if anywhere.
But how about this for a workaround: Right click the object in RSA1 and the select Change instead of Display.
That would save you a click if I counted correctly

DAO and Domain Object

hi,
Normally when i want to persist a domain object like Customer object to a database, my statements will be below,
// code from my facade
Customer cust = new Customer();
cust.setFirstName("myname");
cust.setLastName("mylastname");
// set another attributes
cust.create();
with this code i have a CustomerPersistence object to handler for create this customer record to a database. Now j2ee have a DAO pattern. So my question is,
1.where is a domain object within DAO pattern? --> because of we can reused domain object.
2.DTO is Domain Object, isn't it?
3.when i look at some articles about DAO, many of it will present in this way
facade -->create DTO --> call DAO (plus something about factory pattern)
i never see something like this
facade --> domain object --> dao
any suggestion?
anurakth
sorry for my english!!

Hi,
I am a bit confused about implementation of the domain model and I wondered if you could help. My main concern is that I am introducing too many layers and data holders into the mix. Here is what I am thinking.
DTO - used to carry data between the presentation and the services layer
Service Class - coordinates the calling of domain objects
Domain Object - models a domain entity, service layer logic specific to this object is to be implemented here.
Data Object - an exact representation of a database table. many to many relationship between domain object and data object.
Hibernate DAO Class - has no properties, just methods used for read and writing the object to the database. It is passed in the Data Object for persistence. Is it wrong that the DAO contains no properties?
Perhaps the domain object will contain each data object it is comprised of. I was originally going to keep calls to DAOs in the Services class (as recommended in http://jroller.com/page/egervari/20050109#how_to_change_services_logic ) but I am thinking that each domain object could expose a save method, and that method would co-ordinate persisting itself to the various tables it is derived from.
Does this sound resonable? I have trouble finding a pattern on the net that clealy defines the Domain Model. I was tempted to map Domain Objects directly to database tables, and simply persist the Domain Object, but this 1-1 relationship may not always hold true.
Thanks.

Download and Upload(!) ABAP-Source and DDIC-Objects?

Hi,
is there a standard transaction or third party tool
to download and upload(!!) ABAP-Source (function modules,
function groups, module pools, reports...) and DDIC-Objects
(tables, structures, data elements) to a local file system?
In terms of uploading these objects it would be desirable
that the transaction/tool creates packages/development classes/.. on its own.
I would need that to copy the same source and ddic-objcets to different customer systems without doing it "manually" everytime.
Does anyone know advice?
Thank you,
Bernhard

Hi Bernd,
look here :
Re: how to download pf-status and upload in another system
Andreas

Difference Between Business Object And Class Object

Hi all,
Can any one tel me the difference between business object and class Object....
Thanks...
..Ashish

Hello Ashish
A business object is a sematic term whereas a class (object) is a technical term.
Business objects are all important objects within R/3 e.g. sales order, customer, invoice, etc.
The business objects are defined in the BOR (transaction SWO1). The have so-called "methods" like
BusinessObject.Create
BusinessObject.GetDetail
BusinessObject.Change
which are implemented (usually) by BAPIs, e.g.:
Business Object = User
User.Create => BAPI_USER_CREATE1
User.GetDetail => BAPI_USER_GET_DETAIL
CONCLUSION: Business Object >< Class (Object)
Regards
Uwe

Archiving Object - Entry missing in Customizing table for object Z*********

Hello friends,
We have created a archiving object in transaction AOBJ. However when i enter this object in SARA, we get this error message.
"Entry missing in Customizing table for object Z******* "
I have matched my object with few other archiving objects and things looks similar.
Have you faced this kind of problem..
thanks
ashish

Hi,
I checked and i can see entry for ZSCS_TRAFO object in AOBJ.
But when i enter ZSCS_TRAFO, i get this error :
Entry missing in Customizing table for object ZSCS_TRAFO
Message no. BA057
Diagnosis
A function cannot be executed due to a missing table entry.
Procedure
Please create an entry for the archive object ZSCS_TRAFO with the AOBJ transaction.
However, a few other Z objects works well.
thanks
ashish

Jndi and serializable objects

Hi,
I am attempting to create a cache on the web server to store
frequently accessed reference data. I do so by running a series of
queries in a startup class. The data retrieved from the result set of
each query is stored in a custom class and bound to the server context.
My understanding is that when serializable objects are bound, they are
written to disk (so as not.to waste valuable Heap space I assume). As a
test I made the startup query return a large amount of data and I
expected to see the amount of free disk space decrease as the objects
were bound however I did not see this occurring. I examined the memory
usage of the java process with the NT task manager, and the memory usage
was increasing pretty dramatically as the query results were performed
and new objects created to store this data.
Based on these observations I assume that the objects I created and
bound are stored in the Java Heap and not written to disk. Would
Weblogic at some point write these to disk if memory became tight or is
my understanding that binding an object serializes it incorrect?
If it turns out that what I am attempting here consumes a lot of heap
space, I assume that server performance will suffer which is
unacceptable. Would using read-only entity beans be a better solution?
The container could manage this memory more effectively but it would
seem to add a lot of overhead for a simple read only data cache.
Thanks,
Steve Snodgrass

We never write jndi data to the disk. So if you add more objects your are
going to take up more heap space. You should be looking at other
alternatives to implement this.
-- Prasad
Steve Snodgrass wrote:
Hi,
I am attempting to create a cache on the web server to store
frequently accessed reference data. I do so by running a series of
queries in a startup class. The data retrieved from the result set of
each query is stored in a custom class and bound to the server context.
My understanding is that when serializable objects are bound, they are
written to disk (so as not.to waste valuable Heap space I assume). As a
test I made the startup query return a large amount of data and I
expected to see the amount of free disk space decrease as the objects
were bound however I did not see this occurring. I examined the memory
usage of the java process with the NT task manager, and the memory usage
was increasing pretty dramatically as the query results were performed
and new objects created to store this data.
Based on these observations I assume that the objects I created and
bound are stored in the Java Heap and not written to disk. Would
Weblogic at some point write these to disk if memory became tight or is
my understanding that binding an object serializes it incorrect?
If it turns out that what I am attempting here consumes a lot of heap
space, I assume that server performance will suffer which is
unacceptable. Would using read-only entity beans be a better solution?
The container could manage this memory more effectively but it would
seem to add a lot of overhead for a simple read only data cache.
Thanks,
Steve Snodgrass

Customizing and workbench objects

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for